1
|
Barnard-Kelly K, Whicher CA, Price HC, Phiri P, Rathod S, Asher C, Peveler RC, Holt RIG. Liraglutide and the management of overweight and obesity in people with severe mental illness: qualitative sub-study. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:21. [PMID: 34996406 PMCID: PMC8740474 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03666-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness are two to three times more likely to be overweight or have obesity than the general population and this is associated with significant morbidity and premature mortality. Liraglutide 3 mg is a once daily injectable GLP-1 receptor agonist that is licensed for the treatment of obesity in the general population and has the potential to be used in people with severe mental illness. AIMS To record the expectations and experiences of people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders or first episode psychosis taking daily liraglutide 3 mg injections in a clinical trial for the treatment of obesity. To seek the views of healthcare professionals about the feasibility of delivering the intervention in routine care. METHODS Qualitative interviews were undertaken with a purposive sub-sample of people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders or first episode psychosis with overweight or obesity who were treated with a daily injection of liraglutide 3 mg in a double-blinded, randomised controlled pilot study evaluating the use of liraglutide for the treatment of obesity. Interviews were also conducted with healthcare professionals. RESULTS Seventeen patient participants were interviewed. Sixteen took part in the baseline interview, eight completed both baseline and follow-up interviews, and one took part in follow-up interview only. Mean interview duration was thirteen minutes (range 5-37 min). Despite reservations by some participants about the injections before the study, most of those who completed the trial reported no challenges in the timing of or administering the injections. Key themes included despondency regarding prior medication associated weight gain, quality of life impact of weight loss, practical aspects of participation including materials received and clinic attendance. Healthcare professionals reported challenges with recruitment, however, overall it was a positive experience for them and for participants. CONCLUSION Liraglutide appears to be an acceptable therapy for obesity in this population with limited side effects. The quality of life benefits realised by several intervention participants reinforce the biomedical benefits of achieved weight loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine Barnard-Kelly
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK. .,BHR Limited, Fareham, Hampshire, UK.
| | - Clare A. Whicher
- grid.416105.70000 0004 0435 8173Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton SO30 3JB UK ,Academic Department of Psychiatry, College Keep, Terminus Terrace, Southampton, SO14 3DT UK
| | - Hermione C. Price
- grid.416105.70000 0004 0435 8173Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton SO30 3JB UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- grid.416105.70000 0004 0435 8173Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton SO30 3JB UK
| | - Shanaya Rathod
- grid.416105.70000 0004 0435 8173Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton SO30 3JB UK ,grid.430506.4Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Carolyn Asher
- grid.416105.70000 0004 0435 8173Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton SO30 3JB UK
| | - Robert C. Peveler
- grid.430506.4Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Richard I. G. Holt
- grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Latif M, Awan F, Gul M, Husain MO, Husain MI, Sayyed K, Magsi T, Naz S, Aylem O, Phiri P, Irfan M, Ayub M, Naeem F. Preliminary evaluation of a culturally adapted CBT-based online programme for depression and anxiety from a lower middle-income country. tCBT 2021; 14. [DOI: 10.1017/s1754470x21000313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Online cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), self-help and guided self-help (GSH) interventions have been found to be efficacious and cost-effective for treatment of anxiety and depression, but there are limited data from low- and middle-income countries on culturally adapted digital interventions for these common mental disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of an online culturally adapted CBT-based guided self-help (CaCBT-GSH) for patients with anxiety and depression in Pakistan. This randomized controlled trial recruited 39 participants from primary care in Karachi, Pakistan and randomized them to two groups. The intervention group received seven modules of CaCBT-GSH plus treatment as usual (TAU) over 12 weeks. The control group was a waitlist control plus TAU. The primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Clinical outcomes included results from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2). Assessments were carried out at baseline and at 12 weeks. All 39 individuals who met eligibility criteria for the study agreed to participate. Adherence to the intervention was excellent, with 85% (17/20) completing more than five modules. Statistically significant improvements were found in all clinical outcomes in the intervention group. This was the first trial of an online CaCBT-GSH intervention, which was found to be feasible and acceptable to Pakistani patients with anxiety and depression. CaCBT-GSH may help improve symptoms, depression, anxiety and overall functioning in this population. The results provide rationale for a larger, confirmatory randomized controlled trial of digital CaCBT-GSH.
Key learning aims
(1)
Leveraging digital and virtual platforms to deliver psychosocial interventions may contribute to addressing the significant treatment gap in low-resource settings.
(2)
CBT-informed guided self-help is feasible and acceptable in the treatment of common mental disorders in Pakistan.
(3)
The results of this study merit a larger, appropriately powered confirmatory randomized controlled trial to determine clinical and cost effectiveness.
Collapse
|
3
|
Gregory MA, Legg NK, Senay Z, Barden J, Phiri P, Rathod S, Turner BJ, Paterson TSE. Mental Health and Social Connectedness Across the Adult Lifespan in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Can J Aging 2021; 40:554-69. [DOI: 10.1017/s0714980821000477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractThe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has had profound consequences on collective mental health and well-being, and yet, older adults appear better off than younger adults. The current study examined mental health impacts of the pandemic across adult age groups in a large sample (n = 5,320) of Canadians using multiple hierarchical regression analyses. Results suggest older adults are experiencing better mental health and more social connectedness relative to younger adults. Loneliness predicted negative mental health outcomes across all age groups, while the negative association between social support and mental health was only significant at average and high levels of loneliness in the 65–69 age group. Results point towards differential mental health impacts of the pandemic across adult age groups and indicate that loneliness and social support may be key intervention targets during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should further examine mechanisms of resiliency among older Canadian adults during the pandemic.
Collapse
|
4
|
Delanerolle G, Phiri P, Zeng Y, Marston K, Tempest N, Busuulwa P, Shetty A, Goodison W, Muniraman H, Duffy G, Elliot K, Maclean A, Majumder K, Hirsch M, Rathod S, Raymont V, Shi JQ, Hapangama DK. A systematic review and meta-analysis of gestational diabetes mellitus and mental health among BAME populations. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 38:101016. [PMID: 34308317 PMCID: PMC8283332 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of pregnancy and is associated with an increased risk of mental health (MH) disorders including antenatal and postnatal depression (PND), anxiety and post-traumatic-stress-disorder (PTSD). We hypothesized GDM and MH disorders will disproportionately affect individuals from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic backgrounds. METHODS A systematic methodology was developed, and a protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42020210863) and a systematic review of publications between 1st January 1990 and 30th January 2021 was conducted. Multiple electronic databases were explored using keywords and MeSH terms. The finalised dataset was analysed using statistical methods such as random-effect models, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. These were used to determine odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to establish prevalence using variables of PND, anxiety, PTSD and stress to name a few. FINDINGS Sixty studies were finalised from the 20,040 data pool. Forty-six studies were included systematically with 14 used to meta-analyze GDM and MH outcomes. A second meta-analysis was conducted using 7 studies to determine GDM risk among Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic women with pre-existing MH disorders. The results indicate an increased risk with pooled adjusted OR for both reflected at 1.23, 95% CI of 1.00-1.50 and 1.29, 95% CI of 1.11-1.50 respectively. INTERPRETATION The available studies suggest a MH sequalae with GDM as well as a sequalae of GDM with MH among Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic populations. Our findings warrant further future exploration to better manage these patients. FUNDING Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Yutian Zeng
- Southern University of Science and Technology, United Kingdom
| | | | - Nicola Tempest
- University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Paula Busuulwa
- University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Ashish Shetty
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
- University College London, United Kingdom
| | - William Goodison
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Hemananda Muniraman
- Department of Pediatrics, Creighton University Medical School, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Alison Maclean
- University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - Martin Hirsch
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - Vanessa Raymont
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jian Qing Shi
- Southern University of Science and Technology, United Kingdom
- Alan Turing Institute, United Kingdom
| | - Dharani K. Hapangama
- University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Whicher CA, Price HC, Phiri P, Rathod S, Barnard-Kelly K, Ngianga K, Thorne K, Asher C, Peveler RC, McCarthy J, Holt RIG. The use of liraglutide 3.0 mg daily in the management of overweight and obesity in people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first episode psychosis: Results of a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23:1262-1271. [PMID: 33528914 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of using liraglutide 3.0 mg daily in the management of overweight and obesity in people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first episode psychosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial took place in mental health centres and primary care within Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust. The participants were adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective or first-episode psychosis prescribed antipsychotic medication who were overweight or obese. The intervention was once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or placebo, titrated to 3.0 mg daily, for 6 months. The primary outcomes were recruitment, consent, retention and adherence. The secondary exploratory outcomes were weight, HbA1c and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. RESULTS Seven hundred and ninety-nine individuals were screened for eligibility. The most common reasons for exclusion were ineligibility (44%) and inability to make contact (28%). The acceptance rate, as a proportion of all eligible participants, was 12.2%. The most commonly stated reason why eligible candidates declined to participate related to the study-specific medication and protocol (n = 50). Forty-seven participants were randomized, with 79% completing the trial. Participants in the liraglutide arm lost a mean 5.7 ± 7.9 kg compared with no significant weight change in the placebo group (treatment difference -6.0 kg, p = .015). Body mass index, waist circumference and HbA1c were reduced in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the need for a larger randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of liraglutide (maximum dose 3.0 mg daily) in the management of obesity in people with severe mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare A Whicher
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Dept. Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, West End Southampton, UK
| | - Hermione C Price
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Dept. Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, West End Southampton, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Dept. Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, West End Southampton, UK
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Shanaya Rathod
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Dept. Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, West End Southampton, UK
| | | | - Kandala Ngianga
- Faculty of Science and Health, School of Health and Care Professions, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Kerensa Thorne
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Dept. Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, West End Southampton, UK
| | - Carolyn Asher
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Dept. Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, West End Southampton, UK
| | - Robert C Peveler
- Academic Department of Psychiatry, College Keep, Southampton, UK
| | - Joanne McCarthy
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Dept. Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, West End Southampton, UK
| | - Richard I G Holt
- Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Delanerolle G, Ramakrishnan R, Hapangama D, Zeng Y, Shetty A, Elneil S, Chong S, Hirsch M, Oyewole M, Phiri P, Elliot K, Kothari T, Rogers B, Sandle N, Haque N, Pluchino N, Silem M, O'Hara R, Hull ML, Majumder K, Shi JQ, Raymont V. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Endometriosis and Mental-Health Sequelae; The ELEMI Project. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 17:17455065211019717. [PMID: 34053382 PMCID: PMC8182632 DOI: 10.1177/17455065211019717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background: It is important to evaluate sequalae for complex chronic health conditions such as endometriosis and mental health disorders. Endometriosis impacts 1 in 10 women. Mental health outcomes can be a primary determinant in many physical health conditions although this is an area not well researched particularly in women’s health. This has been problematic for endometriosis patients in particular, who report mental health issues as well as other key comorbidities such as chronic pelvic pain and infertility. This could be partly due to the complexities associated with comprehensively exploring overlaps between physical and mental health disorders in the presence of multiple comorbidities and their potential mechanistic relationship. Methods: In this evidence synthesis, a systematic methodology and mixed-methods approaches were used to synthesize both qualitative and quantitative data to examine the prevalence of the overlapping sequalae between endometriosis and psychiatric symptoms and disorders. As part of this, an evidence synthesis protocol was developed which included a systematic review protocol that was published on PROSPERO (CRD42020181495). The aim was to identify and evaluate mental health reported outcomes and prevalence of symptoms and psychiatric disorders associated with endometriosis. Findings: A total of 34 papers were included in the systematic review and 15 were included in the meta-analysis. Anxiety and depression symptoms were the most commonly reported mental health outcomes while a pooled analysis also revealed high prevalence of chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia. Interpretation: It is evident that small-scale cross-sectional studies have been conducted in a variety of settings to determine mental health outcomes among endometriosis patients. Further research is required to comprehensively evaluate the mental health sequalae with endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rema Ramakrishnan
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dharani Hapangama
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation, Liverpool, UK
| | - Yutian Zeng
- Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Ashish Shetty
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,University College London, London, UK
| | - Sohier Elneil
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,University College London, London, UK
| | - Sam Chong
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,University College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Hirsch
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Molola Oyewole
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,University College London, London, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - Bryony Rogers
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation, Liverpool, UK
| | - Natasha Sandle
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nyla Haque
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicola Pluchino
- Divisions of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Martin Silem
- University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rebecca O'Hara
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - M Louise Hull
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Jian Qing Shi
- Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.,The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Vanessa Raymont
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bakolis I, Stewart R, Baldwin D, Beenstock J, Bibby P, Broadbent M, Cardinal R, Chen S, Chinnasamy K, Cipriani A, Douglas S, Horner P, Jackson CA, John A, Joyce DW, Lee SC, Lewis J, McIntosh A, Nixon N, Osborn D, Phiri P, Rathod S, Smith T, Sokal R, Waller R, Landau S. Changes in daily mental health service use and mortality at the commencement and lifting of COVID-19 'lockdown' policy in 10 UK sites: a regression discontinuity in time design. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e049721. [PMID: 34039579 PMCID: PMC8159668 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate changes in daily mental health (MH) service use and mortality in response to the introduction and the lifting of the COVID-19 'lockdown' policy in Spring 2020. DESIGN A regression discontinuity in time (RDiT) analysis of daily service-level activity. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Mental healthcare data were extracted from 10 UK providers. OUTCOME MEASURES Daily (weekly for one site) deaths from all causes, referrals and discharges, inpatient care (admissions, discharges, caseloads) and community services (face-to-face (f2f)/non-f2f contacts, caseloads): Adult, older adult and child/adolescent mental health; early intervention in psychosis; home treatment teams and liaison/Accident and Emergency (A&E). Data were extracted from 1 Jan 2019 to 31 May 2020 for all sites, supplemented to 31 July 2020 for four sites. Changes around the commencement and lifting of COVID-19 'lockdown' policy (23 March and 10 May, respectively) were estimated using a RDiT design with a difference-in-difference approach generating incidence rate ratios (IRRs), meta-analysed across sites. RESULTS Pooled estimates for the lockdown transition showed increased daily deaths (IRR 2.31, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.87), reduced referrals (IRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.70) and reduced inpatient admissions (IRR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83) and caseloads (IRR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91) compared with the pre lockdown period. All community services saw shifts from f2f to non-f2f contacts, but varied in caseload changes. Lift of lockdown was associated with reduced deaths (IRR 0.42, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.66), increased referrals (IRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.60) and increased inpatient admissions (IRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.42) and caseloads (IRR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12) compared with the lockdown period. Site-wide activity, inpatient care and community services did not return to pre lockdown levels after lift of lockdown, while number of deaths did. Between-site heterogeneity most often indicated variation in size rather than direction of effect. CONCLUSIONS MH service delivery underwent sizeable changes during the first national lockdown, with as-yet unknown and unevaluated consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Bakolis
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Robert Stewart
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - David Baldwin
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jane Beenstock
- Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Paul Bibby
- Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | | | - Rudolf Cardinal
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
- Liaison Psychiatry Service, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shanquan Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | | | - Andrea Cipriani
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Simon Douglas
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Philip Horner
- Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Caroline A Jackson
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences & Informatics, University of Edinburgh Division of Medical and Radiological Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ann John
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | - Dan W Joyce
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sze Chim Lee
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | - Jonathan Lewis
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Andrew McIntosh
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh Division of Medical and Radiological Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Neil Nixon
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham, UK
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London Faculty of Medical Sciences, London, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Tanya Smith
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Rachel Sokal
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rob Waller
- Lothian Primary Care NHS Trust, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sabine Landau
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Delanerolle G, Yang X, Shetty S, Raymont V, Shetty A, Phiri P, Hapangama DK, Tempest N, Majumder K, Shi JQ. Artificial intelligence: A rapid case for advancement in the personalization of Gynaecology/Obstetric and Mental Health care. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 17:17455065211018111. [PMID: 33990172 PMCID: PMC8127586 DOI: 10.1177/17455065211018111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
To evaluate and holistically treat the mental health sequelae and potential psychiatric comorbidities associated with obstetric and gynaecological conditions, it is important to optimize patient care, ensure efficient use of limited resources and improve health-economic models. Artificial intelligence applications could assist in achieving the above. The World Health Organization and global healthcare systems have already recognized the use of artificial intelligence technologies to address 'system gaps' and automate some of the more cumbersome tasks to optimize clinical services and reduce health inequalities. Currently, both mental health and obstetric and gynaecological services independently use artificial intelligence applications. Thus, suitable solutions are shared between mental health and obstetric and gynaecological clinical practices, independent of one another. Although, to address complexities with some patients who may have often interchanging sequelae with mental health and obstetric and gynaecological illnesses, 'holistically' developed artificial intelligence applications could be useful. Therefore, we present a rapid review to understand the currently available artificial intelligence applications and research into multi-morbid conditions, including clinical trial-based validations. Most artificial intelligence applications are intrinsically data-driven tools, and their validation in healthcare can be challenging as they require large-scale clinical trials. Furthermore, most artificial intelligence applications use rate-limiting mock data sets, which restrict their applicability to a clinical population. Some researchers may fail to recognize the randomness in the data generating processes in clinical care from a statistical perspective with a potentially minimal representation of a population, limiting their applicability within a real-world setting. However, novel, innovative trial designs could pave the way to generate better data sets that are generalizable to the entire global population. A collaboration between artificial intelligence and statistical models could be developed and deployed with algorithmic and domain interpretability to achieve this. In addition, acquiring big data sets is vital to ensure these artificial intelligence applications provide the highest accuracy within a real-world setting, especially when used as part of a clinical diagnosis or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xuzhi Yang
- Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | | | | | - Ashish Shetty
- University College London, London, UK.,University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - Kingshuk Majumder
- University of Manchester Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jian Qing Shi
- Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.,The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Greenwood K, Webb R, Gu J, Fowler D, de Visser R, Bremner S, Abramowicz I, Perry N, Clark S, O'Donnell A, Charlton D, Jarvis R, Garety P, Nandha S, Lennox B, Johns L, Rathod S, Phiri P, French P, Law H, Hodgekins J, Painter M, Treise C, Plaistow J, Irwin F, Thompson R, Mackay T, May CR, Healey A, Hooper R, Peters E. The Early Youth Engagement in first episode psychosis (EYE-2) study: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of implementation, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a team-based motivational engagement intervention to improve engagement. Trials 2021; 22:272. [PMID: 33845856 PMCID: PMC8042707 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05105-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services improve health outcomes for young people with psychosis in the medium-long term, but 25% of young people disengage in the first 12 months with costs to their mental health, families, society and the NHS. This study will evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation of a team-based motivational Early Youth Engagement (EYE-2) intervention. METHOD The study design is a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) with economic evaluation, comparing the EYE-2 intervention + standardised EIP service to standardised EIP service alone, with randomisation at the team level. A process evaluation will evaluate the delivery of the intervention qualitatively and quantitatively across contexts. The setting is 20 EIP teams in 5 sites: Manchester, South London, East Anglia, Thames Valley and Hampshire. Participants are young people (14-35 years) with first episode psychosis, and EIP staff. The intervention is the team-based motivational engagement (EYE-2) intervention, delivered alongside standardised EIP services, and supported by additional training, website, booklets and social groups. The comparator is the standardised EIP service. Both interventions are delivered by EIP clinicians. The primary outcome is time to disengagement (time in days from date of allocation to care coordinator to date of last contact following refusal to engage with EIP service, or lack of response to EIP contact for a consecutive 3-month period). Secondary outcomes include mental and physical health, deaths, social and occupational function, recovery, satisfaction and service use at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. A 12-month within-trial economic evaluation will investigate cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective and from an NHS perspective. DISCUSSION The trial will provide the first test of an engagement intervention in standardised care, with the potential for significant impact on the mental health and wellbeing of young people and their families, and economic benefits for services. The intervention will be highly scalable, supported by the toolkit including manuals, commissioning guide, training and resources, adapted to meet the needs of the diverse EIP population, and based on an in-depth process evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 51629746 prospectively registered 7th May 2019. Date assigned 10th May 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Greenwood
- R&D, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK. .,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.
| | - Rebecca Webb
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | - Jenny Gu
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | - David Fowler
- R&D, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.,University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Stephen Bremner
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | - Iga Abramowicz
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | - Nicky Perry
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Stuart Clark
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
| | | | - Dan Charlton
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
| | | | - Philippa Garety
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sunil Nandha
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Belinda Lennox
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Johns
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul French
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.,Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Heather Law
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Cate Treise
- Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Francis Irwin
- Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Carl R May
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Andy Healey
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Richard Hooper
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Emmanuelle Peters
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chau SWH, Wong OWH, Ramakrishnan R, Chan SSM, Wong EKY, Li PYT, Raymont V, Elliot K, Rathod S, Delanerolle G, Phiri P. History for some or lesson for all? A systematic review and meta-analysis on the immediate and long-term mental health impact of the 2002-2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:670. [PMID: 33827499 PMCID: PMC8025448 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10701-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to examine the prevalence of adverse mental health outcomes, both short-term and long-term, among SARS patients, healthcare workers and the general public of SARS-affected regions, and to examine the protective and risk factors associated with these mental health outcomes. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of the literature using databases such as Medline, Pubmed, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection, CNKI, the National Central Library Online Catalog and dissertation databases to identify studies in the English or Chinese language published between January 2003 to May 2020 which reported psychological distress and mental health morbidities among SARS patients, healthcare workers, and the general public in regions with major SARS outbreaks. RESULTS The literature search yielded 6984 titles. Screening resulted in 80 papers for the review, 35 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of post-recovery probable or clinician-diagnosed anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among SARS survivors were 19, 20 and 28%, respectively. The prevalence of these outcomes among studies conducted within and beyond 6 months post-discharge was not significantly different. Certain aspects of mental health-related quality of life measures among SARS survivors remained impaired beyond 6 months post-discharge. The prevalence of probable depressive disorder and PTSD among healthcare workers post-SARS were 12 and 11%, respectively. The general public had increased anxiety levels during SARS, but whether there was a clinically significant population-wide mental health impact remained inconclusive. Narrative synthesis revealed occupational exposure to SARS patients and perceived stigmatisation to be risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes among healthcare workers, although causality could not be determined due to the limitations of the studies. CONCLUSIONS The chronicity of psychiatric morbidities among SARS survivors should alert us to the potential long-term mental health complications of covid-19 patients. Healthcare workers working in high-risk venues should be given adequate mental health support. Stigmatisation against patients and healthcare workers should be explored and addressed. The significant risk of bias and high degree of heterogeneity among included studies limited the certainty of the body of evidence of the review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven W. H. Chau
- Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
- Li Chiu Kong Family Sleep Assessment Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Oscar W. H. Wong
- Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Rema Ramakrishnan
- Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sandra S. M. Chan
- Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Evelyn K. Y. Wong
- Department of Psychiatry, North District Hospital, Sheung Shui, Hong Kong
| | - Pinky Y. T. Li
- Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Vanessa Raymont
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kathryn Elliot
- Research & Development Department, Tom Rudd Unit, Clinical Trials Facility, Moorgreen Hospital, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO30 3JB UK
| | - Shanaya Rathod
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gayathri Delanerolle
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Research & Development Department, Tom Rudd Unit, Clinical Trials Facility, Moorgreen Hospital, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO30 3JB UK
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Phiri P, Ramakrishnan R, Rathod S, Elliot K, Thayanandan T, Sandle N, Haque N, Chau SWH, Wong OWH, Chan SSM, Wong EKY, Raymont V, Au-Yeung SK, Kingdon D, Delanerolle G. An evaluation of the mental health impact of SARS-CoV-2 on patients, general public and healthcare professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 34:100806. [PMID: 33842872 PMCID: PMC8022621 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global impact of COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect the lives of billions of people with recurrent waves. Healthcare systems are struggling to manage pre-existing patient care and recurring covid-19 demands. As a result, we evaluated the mental health impact using systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS A comprehensive search was undertaken from April 2020 to 22nd January 2021 using multiple electronic databases. A systematic review protocol was developed and published on PROSPERO registration; CRD42020181481. A random-effects model was used to compute pooled estimates of anxiety, depression, PTSD, insomnia and suicidal thoughts. FINDINGS Our search yielded 11,295 studies and of those 287 met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of 206 studies revealed minimal differences in prevalence of anxiety, depression, and PTSD among HCPs compared with the public during the pandemic but higher prevalence of suicidal thoughts/ideation or self-harm (11% vs 5.8%) and lower prevalence of wellbeing (28.2% vs 52.6%) among the public compared to HCPs. INTERPRETATION The pandemic has led to a high mental health burden especially amongst HCPs and higher suicidal ideation and lower wellbeing in general public which warrants further investigation and management globally. These findings highlight an emerging critical public health issue that requires urgent solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Dept., Clinical Trials Facility, Moorgreen Hospital, Southampton SO30 3JB, UK
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Rema Ramakrishnan
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Shanaya Rathod
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Dept., Clinical Trials Facility, Moorgreen Hospital, Southampton SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Kathryn Elliot
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Dept., Clinical Trials Facility, Moorgreen Hospital, Southampton SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Tony Thayanandan
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital,University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Natasha Sandle
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital,University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Nyla Haque
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital,University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Steven WH Chau
- Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Oscar WH Wong
- Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Sandra SM Chan
- Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Evelyn KY Wong
- Department of Psychiatry, North District Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Vanessa Raymont
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital,University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Sheena K Au-Yeung
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital,University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
| | - David Kingdon
- University Department of Psychiatry, Academic Centre, College Keep, University of Southampton, UK
| | - Gayathri Delanerolle
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital,University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rathod S, Graves E, Kingdon D, Thorne K, Naeem F, Phiri P. Cultural Adaptations in Clinical InteractiONs (CoACtION): a multi-site comparative study to assess what cultural adaptations are made by clinicians in different settings. Int Rev Psychiatry 2021; 33:3-15. [PMID: 32368938 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1750818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Culture influences models of mental illness, help-seeking behaviours and outcomes of interventions. Cultural competency training has been developed to improve clinician practice in addressing these issues. The study aims to identify to what extent culturally competent and informed interactions are used by clinicians in England and how patients experience these interaction. Clinicians and non-white western patients were recruited to complete a questionnaire on culturally adapted practice in 25 areas of England. Clinicians are much more likely to rate their practice as clinically competent whereas patients were more likely to disagree that services were completely culturally competent. Length of time working as clinicians, receipt of specific cultural competence training and a higher percentage of caseload from non-white western backgrounds all increased clinician's perception that their practice was culturally competent. Clinicians recognised the importance of cultural competency but the disparity between their assessment of whether they achieved this and that of patients must be addressed. Ethics approval was obtained via proportionate review from the London - Central Research Ethics Committee (REC Ref no: 17/LO/1962). Study registration: UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio: 36744.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Kingdon
- Department of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Farooq Naeem
- Centre for Addiction & Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Phiri P, Delanerolle G, Al-Sudani A, Rathod S. COVID-19 and Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Communities: A Complex Relationship Without Just Cause. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021; 7:e22581. [PMID: 33481752 PMCID: PMC7857527 DOI: 10.2196/22581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Emerging evidence has indicated a negative and disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) communities. Previous studies have already reported that biological and social risk factors increase disease susceptibility, particularly in BAME communities. Despite frontline workers in ethnic minority communities in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service attempting to quell the pandemic, disproportionate numbers of BAME physicians and other health care workers have died of COVID-19. This unprecedented situation highlights ethical and moral implications, which could further augment the impact of the pandemic on their mental health. While the government attempts to mitigate the rate of virus transmission, certain key factors inadvertently augment the negative impact of the pandemic on the mental health and general well-being of BAME communities. This study examined the available literature to explore the association between, and the wider impact of, COVID-19 on BAME communities. Furthermore, this study aims to raise awareness and provide a deeper insight into current scientific discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Phiri
- Research & Development Department, Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.,University of Southampton, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Gayathri Delanerolle
- Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Warnford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ayaat Al-Sudani
- Research & Development Department, Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Shanaya Rathod
- Research & Development Department, Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fowler JC, Cope N, Knights J, Fang H, Skubiak T, Shergill SS, Phiri P, Rathod S, Peters-Strickland T. Hummingbird Study: Results from an Exploratory Trial Assessing the Performance and Acceptance of a Digital Medicine System in Adults with Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, or First-Episode Psychosis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2021; 17:483-492. [PMID: 33603385 PMCID: PMC7886232 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s290793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Symptoms of psychotic disorders can complicate efforts to accurately evaluate patients' medication ingestion. The digital medicine system (DMS), composed of antipsychotic medication co-encapsulated with an ingestible sensor, wearable sensor patches, and a smartphone application, was developed to objectively measure medication ingestion. We assessed performance and acceptance of the DMS in subjects with psychotic disorders. METHODS This was an 8-week open-label, single-arm, multicenter, Phase 4 pragmatic study (NCT03568500; EudraCT #2017-004602-17). Eligible adults were diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or first-episode psychosis; were receiving aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, or risperidone; and could use the DMS with the application downloaded on a personal smartphone. The primary endpoint was good patch coverage, defined as the proportion of days over the assessment period where ≥80.0% of patch data was available, or an ingestion was detected. Exploratory endpoints included a survey on user satisfaction, used to assess acceptance of the DMS. Safety analyses included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS From May 25, 2018 to March 22, 2019, 55 subjects were screened and 44 were enrolled. Good patch coverage was achieved on 63.4% of days assessed and the DMS generated an adherence metric of ≥80.0%, reflecting the percentage of ingestion events expected when good patch coverage was reported. Most subjects (53.5%) were satisfied with the DMS. Medical device skin irritations were the only TEAEs reported. CONCLUSION The DMS had sufficient performance in, and acceptance from, subjects with psychotic disorders and was generally well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Corey Fowler
- Global Clinical Development, CNS and Digital Medicine, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
| | - Nathan Cope
- Program Management, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Europe Ltd., Wexham, SL3 6PJ, UK
| | - Jonathan Knights
- Data Insights and Analytics, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
| | - Hui Fang
- Biostatistics, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
| | - Taisa Skubiak
- Clinical Management, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
| | - Sukhi S Shergill
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Moorgreen Hospital, Clinical Trials Facility, Research Department, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Shanaya Rathod
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Moorgreen Hospital, Clinical Trials Facility, Research Department, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Timothy Peters-Strickland
- Global Clinical Development, CNS and Digital Medicine, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rathod S, Pallikadavath S, Young AH, Graves L, Rahman MM, Brooks A, Soomro M, Rathod P, Phiri P. Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic: Protocol and results of first three weeks from an international cross-section survey - focus on health professionals. J Affect Disord Rep 2020; 1:100005. [PMID: 33313579 PMCID: PMC7507987 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadr.2020.100005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The psychological impact of COVID-19, resultant measures and future consequences to life will be unveiled in time. AIM To investigate the psychological impact of COVID-19, resultant restrictions, impact on behaviours and mental wellbeing globally. This early analysis, explores positive and adverse factors and behaviours with focus on healthcare professionals. METHODS This is a cross-sectional survey, using a questionnaire based on published approaches to understand the psychological impact of COVID-19. The survey will be repeated at 6 months because of rapidly changing situation. RESULTS We have presented results from first 3 weeks of the survey. Conclusions may change as more individuals take part over time. 7,917 participants completed the survey in the first 3 weeks; 7,271 are from the United Kingdom. 49.7% of the participants are healthcare professionals. There is high representation of female participants. Participants reporting suicidal thoughts is 32%. Healthcare professionals have reported mild depression and anxiety in higher proportions. Increasing age and female gender report higher compliance with government advice on COVID 19 whereas higher education, homeowners, key worker status, high alcohol, drug use and participants with pre-existing suicidal thoughts reported low compliance with government advice. Participants who reported suicidal thoughts pre-COVID are less likely to communicate with friends and family, or engage in coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS Evidence has shown an adverse psychological impact of previous pandemics on the population, especially wellbeing of healthcare professionals. Research should focus on identifying the need, preparing services and determining the factors that enhance and build resilience. FUNDING This survey is linked to a MRC global health research program of the Portsmouth-Brawijaya center for Global Health, Population, and Policy, (MR/N006267/1), University of Portsmouth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanaya Rathod
- Research department, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Portsmouth-Brawijaya Centre for Global Health, Population, and Policy University of Portsmouth, UK
| | - Saseendran Pallikadavath
- Portsmouth-Brawijaya Centre for Global Health, Population, and Policy University of Portsmouth, UK
| | | | - Lizi Graves
- Research department, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman
- Portsmouth-Brawijaya Centre for Global Health, Population, and Policy University of Portsmouth, UK
| | - Ashlea Brooks
- Research department, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Mustafa Soomro
- Solent NHS Trust, St Marys community Mental health campus, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | - Peter Phiri
- Research department, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Steel C, Korrelboom K, Fazil Baksh M, Kingdon D, Simon J, Wykes T, Phiri P, van der Gaag M. Positive memory training for the treatment of depression in schizophrenia: A randomised controlled trial. Behav Res Ther 2020; 135:103734. [PMID: 33002684 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Steel
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; School of Psychology, University of Reading, UK.
| | - Kees Korrelboom
- Department of Anxiety Disorders, PsyQ Parnassia Group, Psychiatric Center, The Hague, the Netherlands; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychiatry, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - M Fazil Baksh
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK
| | - David Kingdon
- University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Wien, Kinderspitalgasse 15, Austria; Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Til Wykes
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development Department, Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Mark van der Gaag
- VU University and Amsterdam Public Mental Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, Zoutkeetsingel 40, 2512, HN, The Hague, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peckham E, Arundel C, Bailey D, Crosland S, Fairhurst C, Heron P, Hewitt C, Li J, Parrott S, Bradshaw T, Horspool M, Hughes E, Hughes T, Ker S, Leahy M, McCloud T, Osborn D, Reilly J, Steare T, Ballantyne E, Bidwell P, Bonner S, Brennan D, Callen T, Carey A, Colbeck C, Coton D, Donaldson E, Evans K, Herlihy H, Khan W, Nyathi L, Nyamadzawo E, Oldknow H, Phiri P, Rathod S, Rea J, Romain-Hooper CB, Smith K, Stribling A, Vickers C, Gilbody S. A bespoke smoking cessation service compared with treatment as usual for people with severe mental ill health: the SCIMITAR+ RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-116. [PMID: 31549622 DOI: 10.3310/hta23500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a high prevalence of smoking among people with severe mental ill health (SMI). Helping people with SMI to quit smoking could improve their health and longevity, and reduce health inequalities. However, those with SMI are less likely to access and engage with routine smoking cessation services than the general population. OBJECTIVES To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a bespoke smoking cessation (BSC) intervention with usual stop smoking services for people with SMI. DESIGN A pragmatic, two-arm, individually randomised controlled trial. SETTING Primary care and secondary care mental health services in England. PARTICIPANTS Smokers aged ≥ 18 years with SMI who would like to cut down on or quit smoking. INTERVENTIONS A BSC intervention delivered by mental health specialists trained to deliver evidence-supported smoking cessation interventions compared with usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was self-reported, CO-verified smoking cessation at 12 months. Smoking-related secondary outcomes were self-reported smoking cessation, the number of cigarettes smoked per day, the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and the Motivation to Quit questionnaire. Other secondary outcomes were Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items, Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 items and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, to assess mental health and body mass index measured at 6 and 12 months post randomisation. RESULTS The trial randomised 526 people (265 to the intervention group, 261 to the usual-care group) aged 19 to 72 years (mean 46 years). About 60% of participants were male. Participants smoked between 3 and 100 cigarettes per day (mean 25 cigarettes per day) at baseline. The intervention group had a higher rate of exhaled CO-verified smoking cessation at 6 and 12 months than the usual-care group [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 12 months: 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9 to 2.8; adjusted OR 6 months: 2.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.7]. This was not statistically significant at 12 months (p = 0.12) but was statistically significant at 6 months (p = 0.01). In total, 111 serious adverse events were reported (69 in the BSC group and 42 in the usual-care group); the majority were unplanned hospitalisations due to a deterioration in mental health (n = 98). The intervention is likely (57%) to be less costly but more effective than usual care; however, this result was not necessarily associated with participants' smoking status. LIMITATIONS Follow-up was not blind to treatment allocation. However, the primary outcome included a biochemically verified end point, less susceptible to observer biases. Some participants experienced difficulties in accessing nicotine replacement therapy because of changes in service provision. Efforts were made to help participants access nicotine replacement therapy, but this may have affected participants' quit attempt. CONCLUSIONS People with SMI who received the intervention were more likely to have stopped smoking at 6 months. Although more people who received the intervention had stopped smoking at 12 months, this was not statistically significant. FUTURE WORK Further research is needed to establish how quitting can be sustained among people with SMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN72955454. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 50. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Paul Heron
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Jinshuo Li
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Tim Bradshaw
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michelle Horspool
- Research and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Tom Hughes
- Research and Development, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Suzy Ker
- North East York Community Mental Health Team, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Moira Leahy
- Research and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tayla McCloud
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph Reilly
- North East York Community Mental Health Team, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Thomas Steare
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma Ballantyne
- Research and Development, Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Polly Bidwell
- Research and Development, Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Susan Bonner
- Research and Development, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton on Tees, UK
| | - Diane Brennan
- Research and Development, Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Sleaford, UK
| | - Tracy Callen
- Research and Development, Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Alex Carey
- Research and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Charlotte Colbeck
- Research and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Debbie Coton
- Research and Development, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
| | - Emma Donaldson
- Research and Development, Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
| | - Kimberley Evans
- Research and Development, Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Hannah Herlihy
- Research and Development, Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, UK
| | - Wajid Khan
- Research and Development, South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, UK
| | - Lizwi Nyathi
- Research and Development, Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Sleaford, UK
| | - Elizabeth Nyamadzawo
- Research and Development, Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Helen Oldknow
- Research and Development, Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Shanaya Rathod
- Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jamie Rea
- Research and Development, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Kaye Smith
- Research and Development, Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Alison Stribling
- Research and Development, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carinna Vickers
- Research and Development, Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, South Petherton, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rathod S, Thorne K, Graves E, Phiri P, Asher C, Griffiths A, Read T, Kingdon D. Results of a prospective, mixed methods study to assess feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of TRIumPH (Treatment and Recovery In PsycHosis): an integrated care pathway for psychosis, compared to usual treatment. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033711. [PMID: 32354777 PMCID: PMC7213857 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether a newly developed care pathway, Treatment and Recovery In PsycHosis (TRIumPH), is feasible, acceptable and effective in meeting National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards in a timely manner. METHODS This is a pragmatic, non-randomised, prospective, mixed methods study comparing an implementation (TRIumPH) and comparator site (not implementing TRIumPH) across three cohorts to assess feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of the integrated pathway. SETTING Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services at two National Health Service organisations in South of England. PARTICIPANTS All patients accepted into EIP services between 1 June 2014 and 31 May 2017 were each followed up for 1 year within their respective cohorts. METHODOLOGY Quantitative data consisted of routinely collected clinical data retrieved from patient records to assess whether the implementation of TRIumPH achieved better concordance to NICE standards. These included time to access services, physical health assessments, clinical outcomes based timeliness of delivery and acute data. The controlled trial has evaluated the effect of TRIumPH (Intervention) with Care As Usual (Comparator). Qualitative measures consisted of questionnaires, interviews and focus groups to assess acceptability and satisfaction. Outcome measures were compared within the baseline, year 1 and year 2 cohorts and between the two sites. Quantitative data were statistically analysed by comparing means and proportions. RESULTS Time to assessment improved in the implementation site and remained within the target in comparator site. Meeting of quality standards increased substantially in the implementation site but was more variable and reached lower levels in the comparator site especially for physical health standards. Cognitive therapy for psychosis, family intervention and carer and employment support were all offered to a greater extent in the implementation site and uptake increased over the period. CONCLUSIONS Pathway implementation generally led to greater improvements in achievement of access and quality standards compared with comparator site. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio (19187).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanaya Rathod
- Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Kerensa Thorne
- Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Elizabeth Graves
- Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Carolyn Asher
- Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Tracy Read
- Dorset HealthCare NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, Poole, UK
| | - David Kingdon
- Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Whicher CA, Price HC, Phiri P, Rathod S, Barnard-Kelly K, Reidy C, Thorne K, Asher C, Peveler R, McCarthy J, Holt RIG. Liraglutide and the management of overweight and obesity in people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first-episode psychosis: protocol for a pilot trial. Trials 2019; 20:633. [PMID: 31747930 PMCID: PMC6868690 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3689-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background People with severe mental illness (SMI) are two to three times more likely to be overweight and obese than the general population and this is associated with significant morbidity and premature mortality. Although lifestyle interventions can support people with SMI to lose weight, some are unable to make the necessary lifestyle changes or, despite making the changes, continue to gain weight. Objective To assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering a full-scale trial evaluating whether liraglutide 3.0 mg, a once-daily injectable therapy, may be an effective treatment of overweight and obesity in people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first-episode psychosis. Methods Design: a single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: mental health facilities within Southern Health NHS Trust. Participants: 60 adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective or first-episode psychosis prescribed antipsychotic medication will be recruited. Participants will be overweight or obese, defined by their baseline BMI which will be: • BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 or • BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2 to < 30 kg/m2 in the presence of at least one weight-related consequence. This is in concordance with the current EU licence for liraglutide (maximum dosage 3.0 mg). Intervention: participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-based randomisation programme to either once-daily subcutaneously administered liraglutide or placebo, titrated to 3.0 mg daily, for 6 months. All participants will receive standardised written information about healthy eating and exercise at their randomisation visit. Outcomes: the main aim of the study is to gather data on recruitment, consent, retention and adherence. Qualitative interviews with a purposive sub-sample of participants and healthcare workers will provide data on intervention feasibility and acceptability. Secondary clinical outcome measurements will be assessed at 3 and 6 months and will include: weight, fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile, HbA1c level; and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Discussion This study should provide evidence of the potential benefits of liraglutide (maximum dosage 3.0 mg daily) on body weight and metabolic variables in people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first-episode psychosis. It will also address the feasibility and acceptability of the use of liraglutide in mental health settings. This will inform the design of a longer outcome study that will be needed to determine whether any weight loss can be maintained in the long term. Trial registration Universal Trial Number (UTN), ID: U1111-1203-0068. Registered on on 2/10/2017. European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), ID: 2017-004064-35. Registered on 3/10/2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3689-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Alexandra Whicher
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK.
| | - Hermione Clare Price
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK.,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Shanaya Rathod
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK.,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | | | - Claire Reidy
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Kerensa Thorne
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Carolyn Asher
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Robert Peveler
- Liaison Psychiatry, College Keep, Terminus Terrace, Southampton, SO14 3DT, UK
| | - Joanne McCarthy
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Department Tom Rudd Unit, Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Richard Ian Gregory Holt
- Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fowler JC, Cope N, Knights J, Phiri P, Makin A, Peters-Strickland T, Rathod S. Hummingbird Study: a study protocol for a multicentre exploratory trial to assess the acceptance and performance of a digital medicine system in adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025952. [PMID: 31253613 PMCID: PMC6609081 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In patients with schizophrenia, medication adherence is important for relapse prevention, and effective adherence monitoring is essential for treatment planning. A digital medicine system (DMS) has been developed to objectively monitor patient adherence and support clinical decision making regarding treatment choices. This study assesses the acceptance and performance of the DMS in adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis and in healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS/ANALYSIS This is a multicentre, 8-week, single-arm, open-label pragmatic trial designed using coproduction methodology. The study will be conducted at five National Health Service Foundation Trusts in the UK. Patients 18-65 years old with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis will be eligible. HCPs (psychiatrists, care coordinators, nurses, pharmacists), researchers, information governance personnel, clinical commissioning groups and patients participated in the study design and coproduction. Intervention employed will be the DMS, an integrated system comprising an oral sensor tablet coencapsulated with an antipsychotic, non-medicated wearable patch, mobile application (app) and web-based dashboard. The coencapsulation product contains aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone, as prescribed by the HCP, with a miniature ingestible event marker (IEM) in tablet. On ingestion, the IEM transmits a signal to the patch, which collects ingestion and physical activity data for processing on the patient's smartphone or tablet before transmission to a cloud-based server for viewing by patients, caregivers and HCPs on secure web portals or mobile apps. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval was granted by London - City and East Research Ethics Committee (REC ref no 18/LO/0128), and clinical trial authorisation was provided by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Written informed consent will be obtained from every participant. The trial will be compliant with the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03568500; EudraCT2017-004602-17; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Corey Fowler
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Knights
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrew Makin
- Otsuka Europe Development and Commercialisation, Wexham, UK
| | - Tim Peters-Strickland
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gilbody S, Peckham E, Bailey D, Arundel C, Heron P, Crosland S, Fairhurst C, Hewitt C, Li J, Parrott S, Bradshaw T, Horspool M, Hughes E, Hughes T, Ker S, Leahy M, McCloud T, Osborn D, Reilly J, Steare T, Ballantyne E, Bidwell P, Bonner S, Brennan D, Callen T, Carey A, Colbeck C, Coton D, Donaldson E, Evans K, Herlihy H, Khan W, Nyathi L, Nyamadzawo E, Oldknow H, Phiri P, Rathod S, Rea J, Romain-Hooper CB, Smith K, Stribling A, Vickers C. Smoking cessation for people with severe mental illness (SCIMITAR+): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6:379-390. [PMID: 30975539 PMCID: PMC6546931 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30047-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia are three times more likely to smoke than the wider population, contributing to widening health inequalities. Smoking remains the largest modifiable risk factor for this health inequality, but people with severe mental illness have not historically engaged with smoking cessation services. We aimed to test the effectiveness of a combined behavioural and pharmacological smoking cessation intervention targeted specifically at people with severe mental illness. METHODS In the smoking cessation intervention for severe mental illness (SCIMITAR+) trial, a pragmatic, randomised controlled study, we recruited heavy smokers with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia from 16 primary care and 21 community-based mental health sites in the UK. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, and smoked at least five cigarettes per day. Exclusion criteria included substantial comorbid drug or alcohol problems and people who lacked capacity to consent at the time of recruitment. Using computer-generated random numbers, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to a bespoke smoking cessation intervention or to usual care. Participants, mental health specialists, and primary care physicians were unmasked to assignment. The bespoke smoking cessation intervention consisted of behavioural support from a mental health smoking cessation practitioner and pharmacological aids for smoking cessation, with adaptations for people with severe mental illness-such as, extended pre-quit sessions, cut down to quit, and home visits. Access to pharmacotherapy was via primary care after discussion with the smoking cessation specialist. Under usual care participants were offered access to local smoking cessation services not specifically designed for people with severe mental illnesses. The primary endpoint was smoking cessation at 12 months ascertained via carbon monoxide measurements below 10 parts per million and self-reported cessation for the past 7 days. Secondary endpoints were biologically verified smoking cessation at 6 months; number of cigarettes smoked per day, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) and Motivation to Quit (MTQ) questionnaire; general and mental health functioning determined via the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12); and body-mass index (BMI). This trial was registerd with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN72955454, and is complete. FINDINGS Between Oct 7, 2015, and Dec 16, 2016, 526 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the bespoke smoking cessation intervention (n=265) or usual care (n=261). 309 (59%) participants were male, median age was 47·2 years (IQR 36·3-54·5), with high nicotine dependence (mean 24 cigarettes per day [SD 13·2]), and the most common severe mental disorders were schizophrenia or other psychotic illness (n=343 [65%]), bipolar disorder (n=115 [22%]), and schizoaffective disorder (n=66 [13%]). 234 (88%) of intervention participants engaged with the treatment programme and attended 6·4 (SD 3·5) quit smoking sessions, with an average duration of 39 min (SD 17; median 35 min, range 5-120). Verified quit data at 12 months were available for 219 (84%) of 261 usual care and 223 (84%) of 265 intervention participants. The proportion of participants who had quit at 12 months was higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group, but non-significantly (34 [15%] of 223 [13% of those assigned to group] vs 22 [10%] of 219 [8% of those assigned to group], risk difference 5·2%, 95% CI -1·0 to 11·4; odds ratio [OR] 1·6, 95% CI 0·9 to 2·9; p=0·10). The proportion of participants who quit at 6 months was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group (32 [14%] of 226 vs 14 [6%] of 217; risk difference 7·7%, 95% CI 2·1 to 13·3; OR 2·4, 95% CI 1·2 to 4·6; p=0·010). The incidence rate ratio for number of cigarettes smoked per day at 6 months was 0·90 (95% CI 0·80 to 1·01; p=0·079), and at 12 months was 1·00 (0·89 to 1·13; p=0·95). At both 6 months and 12 months, the intervention group was non-significantly favoured in the FTND (adjusted mean difference 6 months -0·18, 95% CI -0·53 to 0·17, p=0·32; and 12 months -0·01, -0·39 to 0·38, p=0·97) and MTQ questionnaire (adjusted mean difference 0·58, -0·01 to 1·17, p=0·056; and 12 months 0·64, 0·04 to 1·24, p=0·038). The PHQ-9 showed no difference between the groups (adjusted mean difference at 6 months 0·20, 95% CI -0·85 to 1·24 vs 12 months -0·12, -1·18 to 0·94). For the SF-12 survey, we saw evidence of improvement in physical health in the intervention group at 6 months (adjusted mean difference 1·75, 95% CI 0·21 to 3·28), but this difference was not evident at 12 months (0·59, -1·07 to 2·26); and we saw no difference in mental health between the groups at 6 or 12 months (adjusted mean difference at 6 months -0·73, 95% CI -2·82 to 1·36, and 12 months -0·41, -2·35 to 1·53). The GAD-7 questionnaire showed no difference between the groups (adjusted mean difference at 6 months -0·32 95% CI -1·26 to 0·62 vs 12 months -0·10, -1·05 to 0·86). No difference in BMI was seen between the groups (adjusted mean difference 6 months 0·16, 95% CI -0·54 to 0·85; 12 months 0·25, -0·62 to 1·13). INTERPRETATION This bespoke intervention is a candidate model of smoking cessation for clinicians and policy makers to address high prevalence of smoking. The incidence of quitting at 6 months shows that smoking cessation can be achieved, but the waning of this effect by 12 months means more effort is needed for sustained quitting. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
| | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Paul Heron
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jinshuo Li
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Tim Bradshaw
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michelle Horspool
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Tom Hughes
- Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Suzy Ker
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
| | - Moira Leahy
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tayla McCloud
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joe Reilly
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
| | - Thomas Steare
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma Ballantyne
- Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | | | - Sue Bonner
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
| | - Diane Brennan
- Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Lincoln, UK
| | | | - Alex Carey
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Charlotte Colbeck
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Debbie Coton
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
| | | | | | - Hannah Herlihy
- Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, UK
| | - Wajid Khan
- South West Yorkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, UK
| | - Lizwi Nyathi
- Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Lincoln, UK
| | | | - Helen Oldknow
- Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Jamie Rea
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | | | - Kaye Smith
- Solent NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Carinna Vickers
- Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, South Petherton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
AbstractCognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) as a treatment for schizophrenia and psychotic-related disorders has been shown to have significantly greater drop-out rates in clients of black and minority ethnic (BME) groups. This has resulted in poor outcomes in treatments. Our recent qualitative study thus aimed to develop culturally sensitive CBT for BME clients. The study consisted of individual in-depth 1:1 interviews with patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizo-affective, delusional disorders or psychosis (n = 15) and focus groups with lay members (n = 52), CBT therapists (n = 22) and mental health practitioners (n = 25) on a data set of 114 participants. Several themes emerged relating to therapist awareness on culturally derived behaviours, beliefs and attitudes that can influence client response and participation in therapy. The current paper aims to explore one of these themes in greater detail, i.e. client-initiated therapist self-disclosure (TSD). Using thematic analysis, the paper highlights key elements of TSD and how this could impact on therapist’s reactions towards TSD, the therapeutic alliance and ultimately, the outcomes of therapy. The findings appear to show that TSD has significant relevance in psychological practice today. Some BME client groups appear to test therapists through initiating TSD. It is not the content of TSD they are testing per se, but how the therapist responds. Consequently, this requires therapists’ cognisance and sensitive responses in a manner that will nurture trust and promote rapport. Further investigation in this area is suggested with a recommendation for guidelines to be created for clinicians and training.Key learning aims(1)To develop a dialogue and practice with confidence when addressing issues of self-disclosure with diverse populations.(2)To appreciate the impact therapist self-disclosure has in early stages of engagement, in particular when working with patients from BME communities.(3)To understand the impact and role of self-disclosure as initiated by patients.(4)To increase therapist awareness on cultural differences in self-disclosure and develop ways to address this in therapy.(5)To challenge therapists to adapt psychological therapies to diverse cultures and be cognisant that ‘one size does not fit all’.
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
SUMMARYThe study of cultural factors in the application of psychotherapy across cultures – ethnopsychotherapy – is an emerging field. It has been argued that Western cultural values underpin cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) as they do other modern psychosocial interventions developed in the West. Therefore, attempts have been made to culturally adapt CBT for ethnic minority patients in the West and local populations outside the West. Some frameworks have been proposed based on therapists’ individual experiences, but this article describes a framework that evolved from a series of qualitative studies to culturally adapt CBT and that was field tested in randomised controlled trials. We describe the process of adaptation, details of methods used and the areas that need to be focused on to adapt CBT to a given culture. Further research is required to move the field forward, but cultural adaptation alone cannot improve outcomes. Access to evidence-based psychosocial interventions, including CBT, needs to be improved for culturally adapted interventions to achieve their full potential.LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter reading this article you will be able to:
•recognise the link between cultural factors and the need to adapt psychosocial interventions•identify the necessary steps to culturally adapt CBT•understand the modifications required to deliver therapy to individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
AbstractCognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in its current form might not be applicable in non-Western cultures. Differences between Western and non-Western cultures have been reported widely. Most psychotherapeutic interventions have been developed in the West and are underpinned by the values that might be specific only to Western culture. To adapt CBT, we need to understand whether the concepts associated with CBT may conflict with cultural beliefs, identifying barriers to the success of the therapy using the views of experts by experience, public and practitioners. This paper discusses the process, foci and framework of cultural adaptation of CBT. We describe an evidence-based framework for adapting CBT for individuals from non-Western cultures that will benefit clinicians who practise CBT and individuals from different cultural backgrounds.
Collapse
|
25
|
Rathod S, Irfan M, Bhargava R, Pinninti N, Scott J, Mohammad Algahtani H, Guo Z, Gupta R, Nadkarni P, Naeem F, Howells F, Sorsdahi K, Thorne K, Osman-Hicks V, Pallikadavath S, Phiri P, Carr H, Graves L, Kingdon D. Multinational comparative cross-sectional survey of views of medical students about acceptable terminology and subgroups in schizophrenia. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021461. [PMID: 29880569 PMCID: PMC6009566 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to inform thinking around the terminology for 'schizophrenia' in different countries. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to investigate: (1) whether medical students view alternative terminology (psychosis subgroups), derived from vulnerability-stress models of schizophrenia, as acceptable and less stigmatising than the term schizophrenia; (2) if there are differences in attitudes to the different terminology across countries with different cultures and (3) whether clinical training has an impact in reducing stigma. DESIGN This is a cross-sectional survey that examined the attitudes of medical students towards schizophrenia and the alternative subgroups. SETTING The study was conducted across eight sites: (1) University of Southampton, UK; (2) All India Institute of Medical Science, India; (3) Rowan University, USA; (4) Peshawar Medical College, Pakistan; (5) Capital Medical University, China; (6) College of Medicine and Medical sciences, Bahrain; (7) Queens University, Kingston, Canada and (8) University of Cape Town, South Africa. METHOD This study extended an initial pilot conducted by the Royal College of Psychiatrists on the term schizophrenia and psychosis subgroups to assess whether the subgroup terminology might have an effect on the attitudes of a convenience sample of medical students from eight different countries and potentially play a role in reducing stigmatisation. RESULTS 1873 medical students completed a questionnaire recording their attitudes to schizophrenia and the psychosis subgroups. A reduction in negative perceptions were found for the psychosis subgroups, especially for the stress sensitivity psychosis and anxiety psychosis subgroups. Negative perceptions were found for drug-related psychosis. Participants who had undergone clinical training had overall positive attitudes. Differences across different countries were found. CONCLUSION The attitudes towards psychosis subgroups used in this study have shown mixed results and variation across countries. Further research is warranted to investigate acceptability of terminology. Methods of reducing stigma are discussed in line with the findings. ETHICS The study received ethical approval from ERGO (Ethics and Research Governance Online; ID: 15972) and subsequently from the ethics committee at each site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanaya Rathod
- Clinical Trials Facility, Tom Rudd Unit, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
- Portsmouth-Brawijaya Centre for Global Health, Population, and Policy, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | - Rachna Bhargava
- Department of Psychiatry and National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Narsimha Pinninti
- School of Osteopathic Medicine, Rowan University, Stratford, New Jersey, USA
| | - Joseph Scott
- Maine Behavioural Health Organization, Biddeford, Maine, USA
| | | | - Zhihua Guo
- Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Rishab Gupta
- Department of Psychiatry and National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Fleur Howells
- Translational Neuroscience Group, Division of Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Katherine Sorsdahi
- Division of Public Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Kerensa Thorne
- Clinical Trials Facility, Tom Rudd Unit, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
| | - Victoria Osman-Hicks
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Sasee Pallikadavath
- Portsmouth-Brawijaya Centre for Global Health, Population, and Policy, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Clinical Trials Facility, Tom Rudd Unit, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
| | - Hannah Carr
- Clinical Trials Facility, Tom Rudd Unit, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
| | - Lizi Graves
- Clinical Trials Facility, Tom Rudd Unit, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
| | - David Kingdon
- Clinical Trials Facility, Tom Rudd Unit, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Peckham E, Arundel C, Bailey D, Callen T, Cusack C, Crosland S, Foster P, Herlihy H, Hope J, Ker S, McCloud T, Romain-Hooper CB, Stribling A, Phiri P, Tait E, Gilbody S. Successful recruitment to trials: findings from the SCIMITAR+ Trial. Trials 2018; 19:53. [PMID: 29351792 PMCID: PMC5775553 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2460-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Randomised controlled trials (RCT) can struggle to recruit to target on time. This is especially the case with hard to reach populations such as those with severe mental ill health. The SCIMITAR+ trial, a trial of a bespoke smoking cessation intervention for people with severe mental ill health achieved their recruitment ahead of time and target. This article reports strategies that helped us to achieve this with the aim of aiding others recruiting from similar populations. Methods SCIMITAR+ is a multi-centre pragmatic two-arm parallel-group RCT, which aimed to recruit 400 participants with severe mental ill health who smoke and would like to cut down or quit. The study recruited primarily in secondary care through community mental health teams and psychiatrists with a smaller number of participants recruited through primary care. Recruitment opened in October 2015 and closed in December 2016, by which point 526 participants had been recruited. We gathered information from recruiting sites on strategies which led to the successful recruitment in SCIMITAR+ and in this article present our approach to trial management along with the strategies employed by the recruiting sites. Results Alongside having a dedicated trial manager and trial management team, we identified three main themes that led to successful recruitment. These were: clinicians with a positive attitude to research; researchers and clinicians working together; and the use of NHS targets. The overriding theme was the importance of relationships between both the researchers and the recruiting clinicians and the recruiting clinicians and the participants. Conclusions This study makes a significant contribution to the limited evidence base of real-world cases of successful recruitment to RCTs and offers practical guidance to those planning and conducting trials. Building positive relationships between clinicians, researchers and participants is crucial to successful recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Catherine Arundel
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | | | | | - Suzanne Crosland
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Penny Foster
- Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, PR2 8DW, UK
| | - Hannah Herlihy
- Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, ME16 9PH, UK
| | - James Hope
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, NE3 3XT, UK
| | - Suzy Ker
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, HG1 2PW, UK
| | - Tayla McCloud
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | | | - Alison Stribling
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB21 5EF, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Ellen Tait
- 2gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, GL1 1LY, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rathod S, Garner C, Griffiths A, Dimitrov BD, Newman-Taylor K, Woodfine C, Hansen L, Tabraham P, Ward K, Asher C, Phiri P, Naeem F, North P, Munshi T, Kingdon D. Protocol for a multicentre study to assess feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness and direct costs of TRIumPH (Treatment and Recovery In PsycHosis): integrated care pathway for psychosis. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012751. [PMID: 28003288 PMCID: PMC5223719 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Duration of untreated psychosis (time between the onset of symptoms and start of treatment) is considered the strongest predictor of symptom severity and outcome. Integrated care pathways that prescribe timeframes around access and interventions can potentially improve quality of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A multicentre mixed methods study to assess feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness and analysis of direct costs of an integrated care pathway for psychosis. A pragmatic, non-randomised, controlled trial design is used to compare the impact of Treatment and Recovery In PsycHosis (TRIumPH; Intervention) by comparison between NHS organisations that adopt TRIumPH and those that continue with care as usual (Control). Quantitative and qualitative methods will be used. We will use routinely collected quantitative data and study-specific questionnaires and focus groups to compare service user outcomes, satisfaction and adherence to intervention between sites that adopt TRIumPH versus sites that continue with usual care pathways. SETTING 4 UK Mental health organisations. Two will implement TRIumPH whereas two will continue care as usual. PARTICIPANTS Staff, carers, individuals accepted to early intervention in psychosis teams in participating organisations for the study period. INTERVENTION TRIumPH-Integrated Care Pathway for psychosis that has a holistic approach and prescribes time frames against interventions; developed using intelligence from data; co-produced with patients, carers, clinicians and other stakeholders. OUTCOMES Feasibility will be assessed through adherence to the process measures. Satisfaction and acceptability will be assessed using questionnaires and focus groups. Effectiveness will be assessed through data collection and evaluation of patient outcomes, including clinical, functional and recovery outcomes, physical health, acute care use. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 months to measure whether there is an effect and if so, whether this is sustained over time. Outcomes measures at the adopter sites will be compared to their own baseline and against comparator sites. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained from East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (REC Ref no: LR/15/ES/0091). The results will be disseminated through publications, conference presentations, reports to the organisation. STUDY REGISTRATION UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio: 19187.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanaya Rathod
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Calmore, Southampton, UK
| | - Christie Garner
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Calmore, Southampton, UK
| | - Alison Griffiths
- Wessex Academic Health Sciences Network, Chilworth, Hampshire, UK
| | | | - Katherine Newman-Taylor
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Calmore, Southampton, UK
- University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Chris Woodfine
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Calmore, Southampton, UK
| | - Lars Hansen
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Calmore, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Tabraham
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Calmore, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Carolyn Asher
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Calmore, Southampton, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Calmore, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Pippa North
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Calmore, Southampton, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Naeem F, Phiri P, Munshi T, Rathod S, Ayub M, Gobbi M, Kingdon D. Using cognitive behaviour therapy with South Asian Muslims: Findings from the culturally sensitive CBT project. Int Rev Psychiatry 2016. [PMID: 26211879 DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1067598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
It has been suggested that cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) needs adaptation for it to be effective for patients from collectivistic cultures, as currently CBT is underpinned by individualistic values. In prior studies we have demonstrated that CBT could be adapted for Pakistani patients in Southampton, UK, and for local populations in Pakistan. Findings from these studies suggest that CBT can be adapted for patients from collectivistic cultures using a series of steps. In this paper we focus on these steps, and the process of adapting CBT for specific groups. The adaptation process should focus on three major areas of therapy, rather than simple translation of therapy manuals. These include (1) awareness of relevant cultural issues and preparation for therapy, (2) assessment and engagement, and (3) adjustments in therapy. We also discuss the best practice guidelines that evolved from this work to help therapists working with this population. We reiterate that CBT can be adapted effectively for patients from traditional cultures. This is, however, an emerging area in psychotherapy, and further work is required to refine the methodology and to test adapted CBT.
Collapse
|
29
|
Steel C, van der Gaag M, Korrelboom K, Simon J, Phiri P, Baksh MF, Wykes T, Rose D, Rose S, Hardcastle M, Enright S, Evans G, Kingdon D. A randomised controlled trial of positive memory training for the treatment of depression within schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15:85. [PMID: 25886265 PMCID: PMC4414283 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-015-0453-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2014] [Accepted: 03/20/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is highly prevalent within individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, and is associated with an increased risk of suicide. There are no current evidence based treatments for low mood within this group. The specific targeting of co-morbid conditions within complex mental health problems lends itself to the development of short-term structured interventions which are relatively easy to disseminate within health services. A brief cognitive intervention based on a competitive memory theory of depression, is being evaluated in terms of its effectiveness in reducing depression within this group. METHODS/DESIGN This is a single blind, intention-to-treat, multi-site, randomized controlled trial comparing Positive Memory Training plus Treatment as Usual with Treatment as Usual alone. Participants will be recruited from two NHS Trusts in Southern England. In order to be eligible, participants must have a DSM-V diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder and exhibit at least a mild level of depression. Following baseline assessment eligible participants will be randomly allocated to either the Positive Memory Training plus Treatment as Usual group or the Treatment as Usual group. Outcome will be assessed at the end of treatment (3-months) and at 6-month and 9-month post randomization by assessors blind to group allocation. The primary outcome will be levels of depression and secondary outcomes will be severity of psychotic symptoms and cost-effectiveness. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with all participants who are allocated to the treatment group so as to explore the acceptability of the intervention. DISCUSSION Cognitive behaviour therapy is recommended for individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia. However, the number of sessions and length of training required to deliver this intervention has caused a limit in availability. The current trial will evaluate a short-term structured protocol which targets a co-morbid condition often considered of primary importance by service users. If successful the intervention will be an important addition to current initiatives aimed at increasing access to psychological therapies for people diagnosed with severe mental health problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials. ISRCTN99485756 . Registered 13 March 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Steel
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK.
| | - Mark van der Gaag
- VU University and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Kees Korrelboom
- PsyQ, Parnassia-Bavo Psychiatric Centre, Stadhoudersplantsoen 2, 2517 JL, The Hague, The Netherlands.
| | - Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK.
| | - M Fazil Baksh
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK.
| | - Til Wykes
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Diana Rose
- Health Service Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Suzanna Rose
- Berkshire Healthcare Foundation Trust, Bracknell, RG12 ILH, UK.
| | - Mark Hardcastle
- Berkshire Healthcare Foundation Trust, Bracknell, RG12 ILH, UK.
| | - Simon Enright
- Berkshire Healthcare Foundation Trust, Bracknell, RG12 ILH, UK.
| | - Gareth Evans
- Berkshire Healthcare Foundation Trust, Bracknell, RG12 ILH, UK.
| | - David Kingdon
- Department of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rathod S, Phiri P, Harris S, Underwood C, Thagadur M, Padmanabi U, Kingdon D. Cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis can be adapted for minority ethnic groups: a randomised controlled trial. Schizophr Res 2013; 143:319-26. [PMID: 23231878 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2012] [Revised: 10/19/2012] [Accepted: 11/03/2012] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is recommended in treatment guidelines for psychotic symptoms (NICE, 2009) but clients from some minority groups have been shown to have higher dropout rates and poorer outcomes. A recent qualitative study in ethnic minority groups concluded that CBT would be acceptable and may be more effective if it was culturally adapted to meet their needs (Rathod et al., 2010). AIM This study assessed the effectiveness of a culturally adapted CBT for psychosis (CaCBTp) in Black British, African Caribbean/Black African and South Asian Muslim participants. METHOD A randomised controlled trial was conducted in two centres in the UK (n=35) in participants with a diagnosis of a disorder from the schizophrenia group. Assessments were conducted at three time points: baseline, post-therapy and at 6 months follow-up, using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) and Insight Scale. Outcomes on specific subscales of CPRS were also evaluated. Participants in the treatment arm completed the Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ) to measure satisfaction with therapy. Assessors blind to randomisation and treatment allocation conducted administration of outcome measures. In total, n=33 participants were randomly allocated to CaCBTp arm (n=16) and treatment as usual (TAU) arm (n=17) after (n=2) participants were excluded. CaCBTp participants were offered 16 sessions of CaCBTp with trained therapists and the TAU arm continued with their standard treatment. RESULTS Analysis was based on the principles of intention to treat (ITT). This was further supplemented with secondary sensitivity analyses. Post-treatment, the intervention group showed statistically significant reductions in symptomatology on overall CPRS scores, CaCBTp Mean (SD)=16.23 (10.77), TAU=18.60 (14.84); p=0.047,with a difference in change of 11.31 (95% CI:0. 14 to 22.49); Schizophrenia change: CaCBTp=3.46 (3.37); TAU=4.78 (5.33) diff 4.62 (95% CI: 0.68 to 9.17); p=0.047 and positive symptoms (delusions; p=0.035, and hallucinations; p=0.056). At 6 months follow-up, MADRAS change=5.6 (95% CI: 2.92 to 7.60); p<0.001. Adjustment was made for age, gender and antipsychotic medication. Overall satisfaction was significantly correlated with the number of sessions attended (r=0.563; p=0.003). CONCLUSION Participants in the CaCBTp group achieved statistically significant results post-treatment compared to those in the TAU group with some gains maintained at follow-up. High levels of satisfaction with the CaCBTp were reported.
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) complements medication management and evidence has shown its effectiveness in managing positive and negative symptoms, promoting treatment resistance, and improving insight, compliance, and aggression in schizophrenia. There is emerging evidence in early intervention, comorbid substance misuse, and reducing relapse and hospitalization. CBT is now recommended by most clinical guidelines for schizophrenia. Treatment is based on engaging the patient in a therapeutic relationship, developing an agreed formulation, and then the use of a range of techniques for hallucinations, delusions, and negative symptoms. This article gives an overview of the current status of CBT for schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanaya Rathod
- Hampshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Melbury Lodge, Winchester, Hampshire SO22 5DG, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rathod S, Kingdon D, Phiri P, Gobbi M. Developing culturally sensitive cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis for ethnic minority patients by exploration and incorporation of service users' and health professionals' views and opinions. Behav Cogn Psychother 2010; 38:511-33. [PMID: 20630118 DOI: 10.1017/S1352465810000378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for schizophrenia demonstrate that African-Caribbean and Black African patients have higher dropout rates and poor outcomes from treatment. AIM The main aim of the study was to produce a culturally sensitive adaption of an existing CBT manual for therapists working with patients with psychosis from specified ethinic minority communities (African-Caribbean, Black-African/Black British, and South Asian Muslims). This will be based on gaining meaningful understanding of the way members (lay and service users) of these minority communities typically view psychosis, its origin and management including their cultural influences, values and attitudes. METHOD This two-centre (Hampshire and West London) qualitative study consisted of individual semi-structured interviews with patients with schizophrenia (n = 15); focus groups with lay members from selected ethnic communities (n = 52); focus groups or semi-structured interviews with CBT therapists (n = 22); and mental health practitioners who work with patients from the ethnic communities (n = 25). Data were analyzed thematically using evolving themes and content analysis. NVivo 8 was used to manage and explore data. RESULTS There was consensus from the respondent groups that CBT would be an acceptable treatment if culturally adapted. This would incorporate culturally-based patient health beliefs, attributions concerning psychosis, attention to help seeking pathways, and technical adjustments. CONCLUSION While individualization of therapy is generally accepted as a principle, in practice therapists require an understanding of patient-related factors that are culturally bound and influence the way the patient perceives or responds to therapy. The findings of this study have practical implications for therapists and mental health practitioners using CBT with people with psychosis from BME communities.
Collapse
|
33
|
|