Gossypiboma: Is it always what it appears to be? A Rare Complication in Everyday Practice

Background: While the management of liver injury is usually conservative, the major indication for surgery remains hemodynamic instability. Different techniques are described for hemostasis in cases which require surgery. Several commercial hemostatic agents are readily available and can be used as an adjunct after the repair of liver injuries. One of the most well-known local agents is gelfoam, which is used in multiple fields of surgery. The purpose of this work is to present a very rare complication of liver surgery in trauma, using gelfoam following hepatic angioembolization, mimicking gossypiboma. Design: A case study describing a hemodynamically unstable patient who had a penetrating liver injury. Hemo-stasis was achieved by liver suture and gelfoam with subsequent angioembolization. In the post-operative period, the patient demonstrated signs of intra abdominal sepsis due to liver abscess. Repeated attempts of percutaneous drainage failed, and all cultures were negative. Due to a strong suspicion of a forgotten abdominal pad (gossypiboma), the patient underwent an operation and the object was removed. The final pathological report showed no textile in the specimen, the findings were compatible with a piece of gelfoam without signs of absorption. Conclusions: Commonly used hemostatic agents are made of gelatin gelfoam, microfibrillar collagen, thrombin, and fibrin sealant. Gelfoam is available in sponge or powder form. The sponge can be left in place and is supposed to be completely absorbed in four to six weeks. In the relevant literature, only one case of gelfoam use related to granuloma formation. In our case, the radiologic findings in the liver were interpreted as an abscess. The suspi-cion of a foreign body was raised only during the second admission and thus forced us to operate. There is no clear reason why the piece of gelfoam was not absorbed in that time period. Our assumption is that post-angiography liver ischemia may have disturbed the process of fibrin destruction. The major take home message is that the lack of gelfoam absorption may mimic an abdominal foreign body, and this needs to be considered in post-operative care.

Total pulmonectomy in trauma: a still unresolved problem--our experience and review of the literature

Emergency pneumonectomy for trauma is associated with very high mortality. Despite significant improvement of the intensive care resources, results of this procedure have not been improved during the last 20 years. When performed because of hemorrhagic shock, pneumonectomy is almost always fatal. We present a series of four patients who underwent total pneumonectomy in our trauma center. The main purpose of this study was to describe pathophysiologic changes and to discuss possible therapeutic alternatives based on the literature review after this operation.

Commentary: Trauma Management During and After COVID-19

Editorial Commentary to: Trauma Management During and After COVID-19.

The Use of Chest Computed Tomographic Angiography in Blunt Trauma Pediatric Population

INTRODUCTION

Blunt chest trauma in children is common. Although rare, associated major thoracic vascular injuries (TVIs) are lethal potential sequelae of these mechanisms. The preferred study for definitive diagnosis of TVI in stable patients is computed tomographic angiography imaging of the chest. This imaging modality is, however, associated with high doses of ionizing radiation that represent significant carcinogenic risk for pediatric patients. The aim of the present investigation was to define the incidence of TVI among blunt pediatric trauma patients in an effort to better elucidate the usefulness of computed tomographic angiography use in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all blunt pediatric (age < 14 y) trauma victims registered in Israeli National Trauma Registry maintained by Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research between the years 1997 and 2015. Data collected included age, sex, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, and incidence of chest named vessel injuries. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS statistical software version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Among 433,325 blunt trauma victims, 119,821patients were younger than 14 years. Twelve (0.0001%, 12/119821) of these children were diagnosed with TVI. The most common mechanism in this group was pedestrian hit by a car. Mortality was 41.7% (5/12).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic vascular injury is exceptionally rare among pediatric blunt trauma victims but does contribute to the high morbidity and mortality seen with blunt chest trauma. Computed tomographic angiography, with its associated radiation exposure risk, should not be used as a standard tool after trauma in injured children. Clinical protocols are needed in this population to minimize radiation risk while allowing prompt identification of life-threatening injuries.

Hemoperitoneum Due to Penetrating Intercostal Artery Injury: A Case Report of a Rare and Still Understudied Entity

Intercostal artery injury may be life-threatening and usually presents as hemothorax. We report a unique case of penetrating injury, causing hemoperitoneum due to intercostal artery injury, without thoracic involvement. During urgent laparotomy, no intra-abdominal organ injury was found. Hemostasis was successfully achieved via suturing through an additional lateral 10 cm incision through the left thorax.

Consensus on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in civilian (prehospital) trauma care: A Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) could prevent lethal exsanguination and support cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In prehospital trauma and medical emergency settings, a small population with high mortality rates could potentially benefit from early REBOA deployment. However, its use in these situations remains highly disputed. Since publication of the first Delphi study on REBOA, in which consensus was not reached on all addressed topics, new literature has emerged. The aim of this study was to establish consensus on the use and implementation of REBOA in civilian prehospital settings for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest as well as for various in-hospital settings.

METHODS

A Delphi study consisting of three rounds of questionnaires was conducted based on a review of recent literature. REBOA experts with different medical specialties, backgrounds, and work environments were invited for the international panel. Consensus was reached when a minimum of 75% of panelists responded to a question and at least 75% (positive) or less than 25% (negative) of these respondents agreed on the questioned subject.

RESULTS

Panel members reached consensus on potential (contra)indications, physiological thresholds for patient selection, the use of ultrasound and practical, and technical aspects for early femoral artery access and prehospital REBOA.

CONCLUSION

The international expert panel agreed that REBOA can be used in civilian prehospital settings for temporary control of noncompressible truncal hemorrhage, provided that personnel are properly trained and protocols are established. For prehospital REBOA and early femoral artery access, consensus was reached on (contra)indications, physiological thresholds and practical aspects. The panel recommends the initiation of a randomized clinical trial investigating the use of prehospital REBOA for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

Comparison of Sense of Humor and Burnout in Surgeons and Internal Medicine Physicians

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate humor styles in surgeons and internists and investigate the association between humor and burnout.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of physicians in surgical and medicine departments was conducted, assessing sense of humor and burnout using the Humor Styles Questionnaire and the Emotional Exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel.

RESULTS

For 131 surgeons and 72 internists, no differences in humor styles were found. A sense of personal accomplishment was more common among surgeons (P = 0.03) and rates of burnout were lower for surgeons (P = 0.02). Physicians with a higher-than-average score in affiliative and self-enhancing humor were less likely to suffer from burnout (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons and internists have similar styles of humor. Surgeons suffer less from burnout. Affiliative and self-enhancing humor styles are associated with reduced burnout.

Hybrid Trauma Management: Is It the Way We Are Heading?

Background: Hybrid trauma management, namely the combination of open and endovascular techniques and/or the application of endovascular methods in the operating/emergency room, is a quickly growing concept worldwide. However, its implications are not well established. We aimed to review the current data regarding hybrid trauma management in medical literature. Methods: A review of the medical literature published between 2000 and 2020 using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Medline databases was performed in search of clinical studies regarding hybrid trauma treatments. Case-reports were excluded from this review. The manuscripts were analyzed regarding the mechanism, location, and type of injury, endovascular and surgical techniques utilized, and the outcome. Results: In total, 14 studies reporting hybrid trauma management in a total of 1,049 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Blunt trauma was the leading trauma mechanism (87.1%) and the most common procedure was transcatheter arterial embolization, performed in 29.7% of patients. The overall mortality was 15.2%. Regarding case-control studies, 85.7% have shown hybrid trauma management to be associated with a shorter time from arrival to intervention, 42.9% reported lower rates of unfavorable outcome, and 28.6% reported reduced requirement for red blood cell transfusion as compared with conventional management. Conclusions: Accumulating data suggests that hybrid management may be associated with a shorter time from arrival to intervention, lower rates of unfavorable outcomes and a reduced requirement for red blood cell transfusion as compared with conventional management of trauma patients.

Targeting prolonged short-term central venous catheters to reduce hospital-wide catheter days and CLABSI rates

BACKGROUND

The risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is associated with central venous catheter (CVC) dwelling time. We implemented a hospital-wide intervention aimed to alert physicians to CVC duration and necessity and to improve the monitoring of CLABSI prevention process measures outside the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A retrospective, before-after study that evaluated short-term, nonhemodialysis CVCs in and out of the ICU. The intervention included enhanced bundle-prevention measures monitoring and staff "sensitization" regarding prolonged (> 7 days) CVCs (pCVCs). The ICU intervention also included daily CVC-stewardship visits. We assessed CVC utilizations and CLABSI episodes 20 months before to 19 months after the intervention using Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

Out of the ICU, CVC-utilization ratio (CVC-UR) and pCVC-UR reduced significantly (4.1-2.7/100 hospital days, P = .005; and 28%-21%, P = .02, respectively). Bundle-prevention measures improved, and CLABSI rates reduced postintervention (7.9-3.6/1,000 CVC days, P = .03). In the ICU, pCVC-UR reduced significantly (29%-15%, P < .0001). Baseline ICU-CLABSI rates were low and did not reduce postintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitizing physicians to the existence and duration of CVCs accompanied by improved bundle-prevention measures, resulted in reduction of pCVCs, and outside the ICU, also in reduction of CVC-UR and CLABSI rates.

International registry on aortic balloon occlusion in major trauma: Partial inflation does not improve outcomes in abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a method for temporary hemorrhage control used in haemodynamically unwell patients with severe bleeding. In haemodynamically unwell abdominal trauma patients, laparotomy remains the initial procedure of choice. Using REBOA in patients as a bridge to laparotomy is a novel option whose feasibility and efficacy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the clinical outcome in patients with abdominal injury who underwent both REBOA placement and laparotomy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study, including trauma patients with an isolated abdominal injury who underwent both REBOA placement and laparotomy, during the period 2011-2019. All data were collected via the Aortic Balloon Occlusion Trauma Registry database.

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients were included in this study. The main mechanism of trauma was blunt injury (62.1%) and the median injury severity score (ISS) was 33 (14-74). Renal failure and multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) occurred in 15.5% and 35% of patients, respectively. Overall, 30-day mortality was 50.5%. Post balloon inflation systolic blood pressure (SBP) >80 mmHg was associated with lower 24-h mortality (p = 0.007). No differences in mortality were found among patients who underwent partial occlusion vs. total occlusion of the aorta.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the feasibility of REBOA use in patients with isolated abdominal injury, with survival rates similar to previous reports for haemodynamically unstable abdominal trauma patients. Post-balloon inflation SBP >80 mmHg was associated with a significant reduction in 24-h mortality rates, but not 30-day mortality. Total aortic occlusion was not associated with increased mortality, MODS, and complication rates compared with partial occlusion.

Correction to: The Operative management in Bariatric Acute abdomen (OBA) Survey: long-term complications of bariatric surgery and the emergency surgeon’s point of view

The original article [1] contained an error in authorship whereby author, Fausto Catena was mistakenly listed as part of the institutional authorship of the OBA trial supporters instead of in the correct position of final author.

Critical systolic blood pressure threshold for endovascular aortic occlusion-A multinational analysis to determine when to place a REBOA

BACKGROUND

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a potential indicator that could guide when to use a resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in trauma patients with life-threatening injuries. This study aims to determine the optimal SBP threshold for REBOA placement by analyzing the association between SBP pre-REBOA and 24-hour mortality in severely injured hemodynamically unstable trauma patients.

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis of the aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) trauma and AORTA registries. These databases record the details related to the use of REBOA and include data from 14 countries worldwide. We included patients who had suffered penetrating and/or blunt trauma. Patients who arrived at the hospital with a SBP pre-REBOA of 0 mm Hg and remained at 0 mm Hg after balloon inflation were excluded. We evaluated the impact that SBP pre-REBOA had on the probability of death in the first 24 hours.

RESULTS

A total of 1,107 patients underwent endovascular aortic occlusion, of these, 848 met inclusion criteria. The median age was 44 years (interquartile range [IQR], 27-59 years) and 643 (76%) were male. The median injury severity score was 34 (IQR, 25-45). The median SBP pre-REBOA was 65 mm Hg (IQR, 49-88 mm Hg). Mortality at 24 hours was reported in 279 (32%) patients. Math modeling shows that predicted probabilities of the primary outcome increased steadily in SBP pre-REBOA below 100 mm Hg. Multivariable mixed-effects analysis shows that when SBP pre-REBOA was lower than 60 mm Hg, the risk of death was more than 50% (relative risk, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.92; p = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

In patients who do not respond to initial resuscitation, the use of REBOA in SBPs between 60 mm Hg and 80 mm Hg may be a useful tool in resuscitation efforts before further decompensation or complete cardiovascular collapse. The findings from our study are clinically important as a first step in identifying candidates for REBOA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Potential resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of aorta candidates: defining the potential need using the National Trauma Registry

BACKGROUND

Most of the trauma patients who die in the first 24 h from arrival to the hospital do so as a result of haemorrhagic shock. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) facilitates expedient proximal aortic control, potentially bridging a needed gap for partial or non-responders to traditional resuscitation en route to emergent definitive haemostasis. This resuscitation tool continues to evolve and has recently achieved some consensus defined indications for its use. The aim of this study is designed to examine the potential utility of REBOA among trauma victims who die within 24 h of arrival.

METHODS

Data of all trauma patients who died in the first 24 h, from 2012 to 2017 were extracted from the National Trauma Registry in the Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research. Patients who died in the first half an hour, and those with neck and thorax injuries were excluded. Demographics, clinical and injury data were collected.

RESULTS

Overall, 129 patients were included; 74% male and 26% female with the mean age of 46.4 years. A total of 76% suffered blunt trauma and 24% penetrating trauma. Mean survival time was 5.87 h. The cause of death was major abdominal organ injury in 47.2%, injury to major abdominal vessel in 23.3% and pelvic fractures in 21.7%. A total of 69 patients (53.5%) ultimately required delayed resuscitative thoracotomy in the operation room.

CONCLUSION

Registry data suggest that there is a subset of patients presenting to modern trauma centres who might benefit from REBOA in order to avoid death.

When all computers shut down: the clinical impact of a major cyber-attack on a general hospital

IMPORTANCE

Healthcare organizations operate in a data-rich environment and depend on digital computerized systems; thus, they may be exposed to cyber threats. Indeed, one of the most vulnerable sectors to hacks and malware is healthcare. However, the impact of cyberattacks on healthcare organizations remains under-investigated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe a major attack on an entire medical center that resulted in a complete shutdown of all computer systems and to identify the critical actions required to resume regular operations.

SETTING

This study was conducted on a public, general, and acute care referral university teaching hospital.

METHODS

We report the different recovery measures on various hospital clinical activities and their impact on clinical work.

RESULTS

The system malfunction of hospital computers did not reduce the number of heart catheterizations, births, or outpatient clinic visits. However, a sharp drop in surgical activities, emergency room visits, and total hospital occupancy was observed immediately and during the first postattack week. A gradual increase in all clinical activities was detected starting in the second week after the attack, with a significant increase of 30% associated with the restoration of the electronic medical records (EMR) and laboratory module and a 50% increase associated with the return of the imaging module archiving. One limitation of the present study is that, due to its retrospective design, there were no data regarding the number of elective internal care hospitalizations that were considered crucial.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The risk of ransomware cyberattacks is growing. Healthcare systems at all levels of the hospital should be aware of this threat and implement protocols should this catastrophic event occur. Careful evaluation of steady computer system recovery weekly enables vital hospital function, even under a major cyberattack. The restoration of EMR, laboratory systems, and imaging archiving modules was found to be the most significant factor that allowed the return to normal clinical hospital work.

Applying local epidemiological data to national policy - the case study of the epidemiology of wrist and hand injury in Jerusalem

Recently, Luria et al. (2019) published a paper in The Israeli Journal for Health Policy Research describing the epidemiology of wrist and hand injuries in two hospitals in Jerusalem. In this important paper, the authors were able to identify two subpopulations at higher than average risk for such injuries.It should be noted that local epidemiological findings could differ from findings for regional, national and international settings. Therefore, it is important to explore the extent to which these findings can be further generalized to other contexts, especially when considering health policy changes.In this commentary, we explore this notion by comparing the results of the Jerusalem Study to those obtained from the Israel National Trauma Registry for the same period. The findings suggest that extrapolating the local findings to the national level should be done cautiously, in light of various differences that were observed.

Do signs of abdominal wall injury on computed tomography predict intra-abdominal injury in trauma patients with a seatbelt sign?

BACKGROUND

A seatbelt sign in patients with blunt abdominal injury is associated with both abdominal wall and intra-abdominal injuries. This study aimed to assess the association between signs of abdominal wall injury on computed tomography (CT) and rates of intra-abdominal injury in patients with a blunt abdominal injury and a clinical seatbelt sign.

METHODS

This study includes hemodynamically stable trauma patients with blunt abdominal injury and a clinical seatbelt sign who were hospitalized in two regional trauma centers in Israel, during 2014-2019. All data were collected via the medical center's trauma registry in both centers.

RESULTS

We identified 123 stable blunt abdominal trauma patients with a seatbelt sign, of which 101 (82.1%) and 22 (17.9%) had a low-grade and high-grade abdominal wall injury according to CT findings, respectively. Laparotomy rates were significantly higher in patients with signs of high-grade abdominal wall injury (p<0.0001). No differences in the timing of laparotomy between low and high-grade injuries were found.

CONCLUSIONS

In stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma and a clinical seatbelt sign, the severity of abdominal wall injury, as represented by CT findings, may predict a need for surgical treatment.

The Differences in Stabbing-Related Injury Profiles of Men and Women

BACKGROUND

Although women comprise only a minority of patients hospitalized due to violence-related injury, the circumstances of attacks against women may make their injuries more severe.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using data of 9173 patients with stabbing-related injuries from 19 trauma centers participating in the Israeli National Trauma Registry between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2014. Male and female patients were compared in terms of demographic and circumstantial factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Women were found to have greater injury severity according to the Injury Severity Scale (ISS) - 18% vs. 11% of severe (ISS 16+) injuries - requiring more hospital resources. Injuries that contributed most to injury severity in the female population were head and severe abdominal trauma. Women also sustained injuries to more body sites than men; however, regression analysis showed that the contribution of this factor to the overall difference in injury severity was less important than the injured sites. Regression analysis among severely injured patients pointed at injury to lower extremities as an independent factor related to female mortality. Different from men, among women the stabbing injuries to the upper extremities were not a protective factor in terms of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences in the injury profiles of male and female stabbing victims, which can be explained by the different circumstances of the injury event.

Does Severity of Pelvic Fractures Correlate with the Incidence of Associated Intra-Abdominal Injuries in Children?

Background Pelvic fractures are considered a marker of injury severity, especially in the pediatric population. However, the correlation between the severity of pelvic fractures and incidence of associated abdominal injuries is not clear. Methods A retrospective cohort study involving blunt trauma patients up to the age of 14 years, who suffered from pelvic fractures, with or without associated intra-abdominal injuries. Results A total of 812 trauma patients were included in this study. Overall, 671 of them suffered from pelvic fractures with abbreviated injury scale (AIS) of 2, 103 with AIS of 3, and 38 with AIS of 4 to 5. Overall mortality was found to be 5.2%, strongly correlating with the severity of the pelvic fractures (p value < 0.0001). There was no correlation between the incidence of most extrapelvic abdominal organ injuries (liver, spleen, small bowel, and pancreas) and the severity of pelvic fractures. A significant correlation was found with intrapelvic organ injuries (p value < 0.0001) and kidney injuries (p = 0.03). Conclusions Mortality of pediatric trauma patients with pelvic fractures is correlated with the severity of the fractures. An increase in the severity of pelvic fractures in this population is associated with an increased incidence of pelvic organ injury, but is not associated with the presence of extrapelvic abdominal injuries, except for kidney injuries.

Spinal cord injury in the setting of traumatic thoracolumbar fracture is not reliably associated with increased risk of associated intra-abdominal injury following blunt trauma: An analysis of a National Trauma Registry database

PURPOSE

There is a common opinion that spinal fractures usually reflect the substantial impact of injuries and therefore may be used as a marker of significant associated injuries, specifically for intra-abdominal injury (IAI). The impact of concomitant spinal cord injury (SCI) with the risk of associated IAI has not been well clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of IAIs in patients suffering from spinal fractures with or without SCI.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the Israeli National Trauma Registry was conducted. Patients with thoracic, lumbar and thoracolumbar fractures resulting from blunt mechanisms of injury from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2018 were examined, comparing the incidence, severity and mortality of IAIs in patients with or without SCI. The collected variables included age, gender, mechanism of injury, incidence and severity of the concomitant IAIs and pelvic fractures, abbreviated injury scale, injury severity score, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad InStat ® Version 3.10, with Chi-square test for independence and two sided Fisher's exact probability test.

RESULTS

Review of the Israeli National Trauma Database revealed a total of 16,878 patients with spinal fractures. Combined thoracic and lumbar fractures were observed in 1272 patients (7.5%), isolated thoracic fractures in 4967 patients (29.4%) and isolated lumbar fractures in 10,639 patients (63.0%). The incidence of concomitant SCI was found in 4.95% (63/1272), 7.65% (380/4967) and 2.50% (266/10639) of these patients, respectively. The overall mortality was 2.5%, proving higher among isolated thoracic fracture patient than among isolated lumbar fracture counterparts (11.3% vs. 4.6%, p < 0.001). Isolated thoracic fractures with SCI were significantly more likely to die than non-SCI counterparts (8.2% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in the incidence of IAIs between patients with or without SCI following thoracolumbar fractures overall or in isolated thoracic fractures; although isolated lumbar fractures patients with SCI were more likely to have renal (3.4% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.02) or bowel injuries (2.3% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.04) than the non-SCI counterparts.

CONCLUSION

SCI in the setting of thoracolumbar fracture does not appear to be a marker for associated IAI. However, in a subset of isolated lumbar fractures, SCI patient is associated with increased risks for renal and bowel injury.

When Should Abdominal Computed Tomography Be Considered in Patients with Lower Rib Fractures?

BACKGROUND

Lower rib fractures are considered as a marker of intra-abdominal organ injury. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is the "gold standard" examination for patients with lower rib fractures. However, the reported incidence of concomitant intra-abdominal injuries (IAI) is 20%-40%.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of intra-abdominal organ injuries in blunt trauma patients with lower rib fractures.

METHODS

Medical charts and radiology reports of patients with lower rib (from the 8th to 12th rib) fractures admitted to our center during a 6-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups. Group I included patients with intra-abdominal injury (IAI) diagnosed either by CT or on urgent laparotomy, and Group II included those with normal abdominal CT scans. Data included demographics, mechanism of injury, laboratory tests, radiology results including number and location of fractured ribs, and incidence of IAI.

RESULTS

Overall 318 patients were included in the study. Fifty-seven patients (17.9%) had 71 IAIs compared with 265 (82.1%) patients with no IAI. Logistic regression identified age younger than 55 years (relative risk [RR] = 7.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-16.8; p = 0.001), bilateral rib fractures (RR = 3.9; 95% CI 1.1-13.5; p = 0.03) and decreased levels of hematocrit (RR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-4.8; p = 0.016) as independent risk factors for the presence of IAI.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal CT should be considered in blunt trauma patients with lower rib fractures who are younger than 55 years of age and have bilateral rib fractures and decreased levels of hematocrit on admission.

Severe Venous Injury in Acute Trauma Setup – Is There a Role for Endovascular Treatment?

Background: The role of endovascular treatment of acute traumatic venous injuries (ATVI) remains controversial. Endovascular resuscitation and hybrid trauma management (EVTM) concepts, which constitute the combination of conventional and endovascular capabilities in the treatment of vascular injuries continue to evolve, yet published reports of traumatic venous injuries treated by endovascular means remain confined to sporadic case reports.Methods: The medical literature from 1990 to 2017 using Pubmed and OVID Medline databases was reviewed to search for reports on the endovascular treatment of ATVI. No publications were excluded due to the small number of publications available. Sixteen reports were found. The manuscripts were analyzed regarding the mechanism, location, and type of injury; endovascular techniques utilized; and both clinical and radiographic outcomes.Results: Endovascular treatment was reported in only 16 patients with ATVI during the study period. Most cases (10/16; 62.5%) were secondary to blunt trauma, while the rest (6/16; 37.5%) were secondary to penetrating injuries equally divided between gunshot wounds and stab wounds. Endovascular stent or stent graft utilization was employed in 12 of these cases, 2 cases were treated by endovascular embolization and in 2 cases endovascular balloons were used for temporary hemorrhage control to facilitate open surgical exposure and intervention. No mortalities related to the endovascular interventions were reported.Conclusion: The experience with endovascular treatment of ATVI remains very limited. The results currently available, although very limited in numbers, appear promising. Additional study will prove essential in defining the optimal employment of EVTM concepts in the management of venous injuries, particularly as technology continues to advance and experience with these modalities increases.