Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common infections associated with health care, but its importance as a global health priority is not fully understood. We quantified the burden of SSI after gastrointestinal surgery in countries in all parts of the world.

METHODS

This international, prospective, multicentre cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency gastrointestinal resection within 2-week time periods at any health-care facility in any country. Countries with participating centres were stratified into high-income, middle-income, and low-income groups according to the UN's Human Development Index (HDI). Data variables from the GlobalSurg 1 study and other studies that have been found to affect the likelihood of SSI were entered into risk adjustment models. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day SSI incidence (defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for superficial and deep incisional SSI). Relationships with explanatory variables were examined using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02662231.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 4, 2016, and July 31, 2016, 13 265 records were submitted for analysis. 12 539 patients from 343 hospitals in 66 countries were included. 7339 (58·5%) patient were from high-HDI countries (193 hospitals in 30 countries), 3918 (31·2%) patients were from middle-HDI countries (82 hospitals in 18 countries), and 1282 (10·2%) patients were from low-HDI countries (68 hospitals in 18 countries). In total, 1538 (12·3%) patients had SSI within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of SSI varied between countries with high (691 [9·4%] of 7339 patients), middle (549 [14·0%] of 3918 patients), and low (298 [23·2%] of 1282) HDI (p<0·001). The highest SSI incidence in each HDI group was after dirty surgery (102 [17·8%] of 574 patients in high-HDI countries; 74 [31·4%] of 236 patients in middle-HDI countries; 72 [39·8%] of 181 patients in low-HDI countries). Following risk factor adjustment, patients in low-HDI countries were at greatest risk of SSI (adjusted odds ratio 1·60, 95% credible interval 1·05-2·37; p=0·030). 132 (21·6%) of 610 patients with an SSI and a microbiology culture result had an infection that was resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic used. Resistant infections were detected in 49 (16·6%) of 295 patients in high-HDI countries, in 37 (19·8%) of 187 patients in middle-HDI countries, and in 46 (35·9%) of 128 patients in low-HDI countries (p<0·001).

INTERPRETATION

Countries with a low HDI carry a disproportionately greater burden of SSI than countries with a middle or high HDI and might have higher rates of antibiotic resistance. In view of WHO recommendations on SSI prevention that highlight the absence of high-quality interventional research, urgent, pragmatic, randomised trials based in LMICs are needed to assess measures aiming to reduce this preventable complication.

FUNDING

DFID-MRC-Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trial Development Grant, National Institute of Health Research Global Health Research Unit Grant.

T, Nigo Samuel L, Otuneme C, Prosper N, Umenze F, Boutros M, Caminsky N, Dumitra S, Garfinkle R, Morency D, Salama E, Banks A, Ferri L, He H, Katz A, Liberman AS, Meterissian S, Pang A, Parvez E, Agarwal A, Dare A, Hameed U, Osman F, Sequeira S, Coburn N, Dare A, Jaffer A, Karanicolas P, Mosseler M, Musselman R, Liu X, Yip CW, Garces-Otero JS, Guzman C, Sierra S, Uribe Valencia A, Cabrera Rivera PA, Camelo S, Gonzalez A, González-Orozco A, Mosquera Paz MS, Perez Rivera CJ, Gonzalez F, Isaza-Restrepo A, Nino- Torres L, Arias Madrid N, Mendoza Arango MC, Sierra S, Bake J, Tsandiraki J, Jemendžic D, Kocman B, Šuman O, Canic R, Jurišic D, Karakas I, Krizanovic Rupcic A, Pitlovic V, Samardžic J, Kopljar M, Bacic I, Domini E, Karlo R, Mihanovic J, Miljanic D, Simic A, Ahmed M, Al Nassrallah M, Altaf R, Amjad T, Eltoum R, Haidar H, Hassan A, Khalil O, Qasem M, Ramesh R, Sajith G, Wisal M, Žatecký J, Bujda M, Jirankova K, Paclik A, Abdallah A, Abdulgawad Almogy M, Ayman El-sawy E, ElFayoumy AM, Elghareeb N, Esmat NA, Fadel A, Habater A, Hamdy H, Hefni A, Kamal M, Mohamed Abobakr N, Sayed A, Shaker N, Taha E, Tharwat H, Zakaria O, Abdelmotaleb I, Al-Dhufri A, Al-Himyari HS, El sheikh E, Eldmaty A, Elkhalawy A, M.Elkhashen A, Magdy K, Mostafa S, Sadia HD, Saleh MM, Samir D, Yahia Mohamed Ali M, A. Nassar M, Abdelhady S, Abdelrazek A, Abdelsalam I, El-Sawy A, Essam E, Gadelkarim M, Ghaly K, Hassabalnaby M, Masarani R, Mohamed Shaaban N, Sabry A, Salem M, Soliman NA, Zahran D, Abou El.soud MR, Badr ET, Borham H, Elmeslemany N, Elsayed M, Elsherif F, Eslam S, Gaber G, Ibrahim S, Kamh Y, Mahmoud A, Mohamed SG, Morshedy E, Omar C, Salem Soliman F, Abdelkawy S, Abdelmohsen N, Abdelshakour M, Dahy A, Gamal N, Gamal M, Hasan A, Hetta H, Mousa N, Omar M, Rabie S, Saad M, Saleh B, Sayed Mohamed M, Shawqi M, Abdelhady Mousa H, Alnoury M, Elbealawy M, Elshafey A, Essam Ibrahim El Desouki Muhammad Ahmed M, Ghonaim M, Hgag F, Ibrahim M, Morsy M, Reda Loaloa M, Refaat A, Samir H, Shahien F, Sobhy M, Sroor F, Abdellatif E, Adel M, Afifi AA, Afifi E, Antaky M, Dawoud A, El Zoghby N, El-remaily A, Elzanfaly AA, Gadallah A, Gamal FA, Hashem O, Medhat Youssef S, Muhammad Attyah A, Munir M, Shazly O, Taha E, Wilson K, Adel S, Ali A, Eid E, Elhelow E, Elmahdy M, Elshatby B, Hossam el-din Zakaria A, Hossny A, Ibrahim E, M.Yonis A, Metwalli M, Yousry B, Zid E, A Yacoub M, Abdelhakim A, Abouelsoad N, Alkhatib M, Ashraf A, Ashraf A, Elazab Y, Elfanty M, Elkabir O, Elsayed M, Elshimy A, Elsobky H, Eskander J, Gad A, Hamsho W, Khaled Abdelwahed N, Magdy M, Moharam D, Osama A, Ramadan S, Roum R, Sayed T, Shehada T, Zidan AM, Abbas K, Ali A, Attia M, Balata M, El Nakeeb A, Elewaily MIE, Elfallal A, Elfeki H, Elkhadragy A, Emile S, Ezzat H, Hosni H, Mansour I, Omar W, Othman G, Sadek K, Shalaby M, Shehab-Eldeen N, Anas khalifa R, Badr H, Eldeep M, Eldeep A, Eldoseuky mohammed A, Khallaf S, Magdy Hegazy E, Mahmoud R, Mikhail P, Morsi M, Mowafy S, Raafat D, Safy A, Sera M, Sera AS, AbdAllah MSM, Abdelkader M, Abdou AO, Ahmed A, Gaafar S, Ibrahim negm F, Lapic M, Maher A, Mahmoud H, Mostafa A, Samir M, Samy F, Semeda N, Shalaby HI, El-taweel A, Galal Elnagar A, Hemidan AG, Hussein M, Kandil A, Moawad M, Nasser Hamamah AA, Soliman M, Abdelkhalek M, Abdelmaksoud Tawakel N, Abdelwahed AM, Abdou A, Atallah K, Elsherbeny MY, Emara E, Hamdy M, Hamdy O, Haron A, Ismail S, Metwally IH, Mohamed Hamed Elgaml N, Nassar A, Refky B, Sadek M, Saleh M, Yunes A, Zakaria M, Zuhdy M, Fayed N, Mohammed MMH, Kütner S, Melnik P, Seire I, Teras J, Ümarik T, Ainoa E, Eerola V, Koppatz H, Koskenvuo L, Sallinen V, Takala S, Katunin J, Kechagias A, Turunen A, Christou N, Mathonnet M, Lavoue V, Nyangoh Timoh K, Soulabaille L, Lesourd R, Merdrignac A, Sulpice L, André B, Chantalat E, Vaysse C, Dousset B, Gaujoux S, Martin G, Clonda O, Juodis D, Kienle K, Mravik A, Palmer S, Szabadhegyi G, Agbeko AE, Gyabaah S, Gyamfi FE, Naabo N, Owusu senior A, Yorke J, Owusu F, Abantanga F, Anyomih TTK, Muntaka AJM, Owusu Abem E, Sheriff M, Tabiri S, Wondoh PM, Balalis D, Korkolis D, Gkiokas G, Pantiora E, Theodosopoulos T, Ioannidis A, Konstantinidis K, Konstantinidou S, Machairas N, Paspala A, Prodromidou A, Chouliaras C, Papadopoulos K, Baloyiannis I, Mamaloudis I, Tzovaras G, Akrida I, Argentou MI, Germanos S, Iliopoulos E, Maroulis I, Skroubis G, Theofanis G, Chatzakis C, Ioannidis O, Loutzidou L, Kalles V, Karathanasis P, Michalopoulos N, Theodoropoulos C, Theodorou D, Triantafyllou T, Garoufalia Z, Hasemaki N, Kontos M, Kouraklis G, Kykalos S, Liakakos T, Mpaili E, Papalampros A, Schizas D, Syllaios A, Tampaki EC, Tsimpoukelis A, Antonopoulou MI, Deskou E, Manatakis DK, Papageorgiou D, Zoulamoglou M, Anthoulakis C, Margaritis M, Nikoloudis N, Campo V, Ceballos A, Flores MA, Giron W, Ko D, Martinez G, Recinos G, Rivera Lara V, Rueda N, Sanchez A, Tejeda Garrido JCG, Aguilera-Arevalo ML, Alvarez Rivera AE, Bamaca Ixcajoc EB, Barreda Zelaya LE, Chacòn-Herrera P, Corea Ruiz LM, Echeverria-Davila G, Garcia M, García D, Gutiérrez Mayen EF, José N, Mazariegos N, Méndez D, Paniagua Espinoza M, Baranyai Z, Bardos D, Benke M, Illes K, Kokas BA, Szabó R, Appukuttan A, Asok A, D.k V, Malik K, Ravishankaran P, Tapkire R, Moorthy G, Abraham J, Muthuvel R, Alapatt J, Kattepur A, Pareekutty N, Garod M, Harris C, Wanniang C, Gupta A, Nehra D, Parshad S, Acharya R, Badwe R, Bhandare M, Jain U, Kirti K, Nair N, Shrikhande S, Thakkar P, Anandan P, C S A, Holenarasipur Narasannaiah A, Jagarlamudi T, Kumar Venkatappa S, M R R, Manangi M, Raghavendra A, Rao KS, S V, Sajjan V, Shenoy A, Shivashankar Chikkanayakanahalli S, Tharanath K, V S, Adidharma P, Agarwal R, Amandito R, Anggita Gultom P, Arifin GR, Billy M, Elfizri Z, Fahira A, Felicia D, Gunardi TH, Johanna N, Nugrahadi NR, Panigoro SS, Rahmayanti S, Sihotang RC, Brata SY, Winoto H, Barati N, Karami M, Khorshidi H, Naderifar H, Abdulla MA, Coleman M, Doherty RJ, Hannon R, Murphy B, Stakelum A, Winter D, Aljohmani L, Farnan R, Seldon Y, Tan T, Varghese S, Alherz M, Ather M, Bajilan M, Graziadei V, Pilkington I, Quidwai O, Ridgway P, Shiwani H, Tahir AAR, Blunnie E, Burke D, Kennedy N, Macdonagh K, O'Neill M, Rooney S, Falco G, Ferrari G, Mele S, Nita GE, Ugoletti L, Zizzo M, Confalonieri G, Pesenti G, Tagliabue F, Baronio G, Ongaro D, Pata G, Compagnoni B, Salvadori R, Taglietti L, D'Alessandro N, Di Lascio P, Pascale G, Bortolasi L, Campagnaro T, Carlini M, Lisi G, Lombardi D, Pedrazzani C, Spoletini D, Turri G, Violi P, Altomare DF, Aquilino F, Musa N, Papagni V, Picciariello A, Vincenti L, Andreotti D, Occhionorelli S, Tondo M, Basso SMM, Cirelli R, Maino MEM, Piozzi GN, Picone E, Scaramuzzo R, Sinibaldi G, Amendola A, Anastasio L, Bucci L, Caruso E, Castaldi A, Di Maso S, Dinuzzi VP, Esposito G, Gaudiello M, Giglio MC, Greco PA, Luglio G, Manfreda A, Marra E, Mastella F, Pagano G, Peltrini R, Pepe V, Sacco M, Sollazzo V, Spiezio G, Cianchetti E, Menduni N, Carvello MM, Di Candido F, Spinelli A, Corsi F, Sorrentino L, Marino F, Asti ELG, Bonavina L, Rausa E, Asta M, Belli A, Bianco F, Cervone C, Delrio P, Falato A, Fares Bucci A, Guarino R, Pace U, Rega D, De Luca E, Gallo G, Sammarco G, Sena G, Vescio G, Santandrea L, Ugolini G, Zattoni D, Chetta N, Logrieco G, Vanella S, Garulli G, Zanini N, Bondurri A, Cammarata F, Colombo F, Foschi D, Lamperti GMB, Maffioli A, Sampietro GM, Yakushkina A, Zaffaroni G, Ansaloni L, Cicuttin E, Sibilla MG, Impellizzeri H, Inama M, Moretto G, Mochet S, Ponte E, Usai A, Mancini S, Sagnotta A, Solinas L, Bolzonaro E, Tamini N, Curletti G, Galleano R, Malerba M, Campanella S, Cocorullo G, Colli F, De Marco P, Falco N, Fontana T, Kamdem Mambou LJ, La Brocca A, Licari L, Randisi B, Rizzo G, Rotolo G, Salamone G, Tutino R, Venturelli P, Malabarba S, Sgrò A, Vella I, Cirillo B, Crocetti D, De Toma G, Lapolla P, Mingoli A, Sapienza P, Belvedere A, Bianchini S, Binetti M, Birindelli A, Tonini V, Podda M, Pulighe F, De Rosa M, Bono L, Borghi F, Geretto P, Giuffrida MC, Lauro C, Marano A, Pellegrino L, Salusso P, Sasia D, Campanelli M, Realis Luc A, Trompetto M, Cardia R, Cillara N, Giordano AN, Costanzo A, Giovilli MA, Turati L, Canonico S, Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Selvaggi F, Selvaggi L, Albsoul N, AlBsoul A, Alkhatib AA, Alsallaq O, Amarin JZ, Ayoub R, Bsisu I, El Muhtaseb MS, Jabaiti M, Melhem J, Nour I, Qwaider YZ, Salameh MH, Suleihat A, Suradi HH, Alammarin M, Aljaafreh A, Bani hani M, Bani hani Z, Bani Hani F, Fahmawee T, Hamouri S, Katanani C, Tawalbeh R, Tawalbeh T, Zawahrah H, Abou Chaar MK, Abusalem L, Al-Masri M, Al-Najjar H, Barghuthi L, Ahmed Z, Maulana A, Ngotho O, Kamau C, Stanley Mwenda A, Bosire F, Mwachiro E, Parker R, Simel I, Sylvester K, Althini AAM, Elbarouni S, Elbeshina AE, Gwea A, Malek A, Masoud Farag WA, Abdalei A, Abdel Malik AB, Abo-khammash A, Abuhlaiga M, Adnan N, Albaggar M, Alfitory A, Aljanfi A, Almuzghi F, Altumei Z, Alzabti F, Ashoushan H, Assalhi M, Azzubia J, Bnhameida S, Delhen M, Elshafei H, Elteir H, Esbaga F, Gobbi AA, Hamouda F, Hilan H, Ismail R, Jebran F, Kasbour M, Maderi G, Mohammad S, Mohammed B, Murtadi H, Mustafa H, Rajab M, Trenba S, Wafaa M, Al Sagheir E, Almigheerbi A, Alzahaf A, Bahroun SG, Ben Dallah N, Elshaibani M, Eswaye H, Karar M, Omar S, Younes E, Younes M, Zreeg D, Abujamra S, Ashour F, Elgammudi M, Omar F. Aljadidi W, Saddouh E, Sharif R, Alabuzidi A, Alwerfally A, Aribi S, Bibas F, Elfaituri T, Elhajjaji Y, Khaled A, Khalil W, Layas T, Soula E, Tarek A, Abu hallalah MFK, Abujamra S, Ahmed HA, Alsharef T, Ben Saoud AA, El Gharmoul T, Elhadi A, Elrais S, Shebani A, Zarti H, Zeiton A, Ambrazevicius M, Kaselis N, Stakyte M, Aliosin O, Cizauskaite A, Dailidenas S, Eismontas V, Kybransiene M, Nutautiene V, Samalavicius N, Simcikas D, Slepavicius A, Tamosiunas A, Ubartas N, Zeromskas P, Bradulskis S, Dainius E, Juocas J, Kubiliute E, Kutkevicius J, Opolskis A, Parseliunas A, Subocius A, Venskutonis D, Virbickaite E, Zuikyte D, Bogusevicius A, Buzaite K, Cepuliene D, Cesleviciene I, Cesna V, Gribauskaite J, Ignatavicius P, Jokubauskas M, Liugailaite M, Margelis E, Mazelyte R, Pankratjevaite L, Pažusis M, Rackeviciute A, Saladyte J, Škimelyte M, Šlenfuktas V, Sudeikyte M, Tamelis A, Vanagas T, Žumbakys Ž, Atkociunas A, Dulskas A, Kuliavas J, Birutis J, Paškevicius S, Šatkauskas M, Danys D, Jakubauskas M, Jakubauskiene L, Kryzauskas M, Lipnickas V, Makunaite G, Rasoaherinomenjanahary F, Rasolofonarivo H, Samison LH, Banda B, Malemia P, Msosa V, Ahmad Izzuddin AI, Das A, Gan YY, Shong Sheng T, Siaw JY, Ab Rahim MF, Abang Jamari DZH, Che Husin N, Kamarulzaman MY, Lim YP, Mohamed Kamil NA, Mohd Hassan MR, Mohd Sahid S, Mustafa J, Ng EHB, Wan Khazim WK, Chang Ern N, Lingeshan P, Sulaiman SE, Ang SE, Bin Mohamad Sithik MN, Cheong YJ, Deva Tata M, Jia Xian L, Kadravello A, Koh IE, Ng LY, Ng We Yong YJ, Palayan K, Sam CX, Siow Jin P, Tan Ern Hwei J, Tang Y, Ter AZ, Wong MPK, Zakaria AD, Zakaria Z, Henry F, Kalaiselvan T, Abd Karim MFS, Abdul Aziz MR, Abdul Aziz N, Khong TL, Lau PC, Lim HC, Roslani AC, Seak JCK, Wong SW, Wong LF, Yeen Chin L, Anyanwu MC, Borg E, Busuttil Z, Calleja T, Chircop KL, Cutajar R, Dimech AM, Ellul S, Galea J, Gascon Perai K, Gatt R, Kelman L, Micallef E, Nwolu F, Sammut K, Thompson J, Warwicker S, Zammit M, Cordera F, Cruz González E, Sánchez-García J, Barbosa Camacho FJ, Barrera López FJ, Zuloaga Fernandez del Valle CJ, Acosta E, González Espinoza IR, Moreno P, Cortes-Flores AO, Fuentes Orozco C, Gonzalez Ojeda A, Corro Díaz González S, Martinez L, Ramos-De la Medina A, Mosqueda Amador B, Novoa A, Olazo Espejo DA, Jimenez A, Lopez Rosales F, Vanoye EG, Garcia Gonzalez LA, Miranda-Ackerman RC, Solano-Genesta M, Alvarez-Cano A, Romero-Garza HH, Medina-Franco H, Mejía-Fernández L, Salgado-Nesme N, Vergara-Fernandez O, Gutiérrez-Mota GM, Hernandez Vera FX, Llantada Lopez A, Morgan Villela G, Ramirez Padilla FDJ, Tapia Marin W, Martínez Maldonado M, Sánchez Suárez R, Troche JM, Benyaiche C, Outani O, Amine S, Benkabbou A, Majbar AM, Mohsine R, Rafik A, Oung T, Tin MM, Borowski DW, Plarre P, Borowski DW, Plarre P, Alberga A, Sluiter N, Tuynman J, Blok R, Cömert D, Hompes R, Kalff M, Stellingwerf ME, Tanis P, van Berge Henegouwen M, van Praag EM, Wisselink D, Gerhards M, Lopes Cardozo J, Westerduin E, de Jonge J, van Geloven A, van Schilt K, den Boer F, Stoots S, Vlek S, Adams J, Al-Busaidi IS, Budd G, Choi SI, Chu MJJ, Ganugapati A, McKinstry L, Pascoe R, Richards S, Rosser K, Stevenson A, White R, Farik S, Kwun J, Murad A, Cowan S, Hall T, Hayton M, Malam Sani L, Oumarou Garba S, Adamou H, Amadou Magagi I, Habou O, Aliyu H, Daniyan M, Sholadoye TT, Abdullahi L, Anyanwu LJ, Mohammad Mohammad A, Muhammad AB, Sheshe AA, Suleiman I, Adesina A, Awolowo A, Onuoha C, Salami O, Taiwo O, Taiwo A, Kache S, Makama JG, Sale D, Abiola O, Ajao A, Ajiboye A, Etonyeaku A, Olaogun J, Adebanjo A, Adesanya O, Afolayan MO, Balogun O, Makanjuola A, Nwokocha S, Ojewola RW, Olajide TO, Aderounmu A, Adesunkanmi AR, Adisa A, Agbakwuru A, Akeem Aderogba A, Alatise OI, Arowolo O, Lawal O, Mohammed T, Ndegbu C, Olasehinde O, Wuraola F, Akinkuolie A, Etonyeaku A, Mosanya A, Ayandipo O, Elemile P, Lawal TA, Ali SANI S, Garba S, Hauwa SANI R, Olori S, Onyebuashi H, Umoke I, Adenuga A, Adeyeye A, Habeeb O, Lawal B, Nasir A, Aahlin EK, Kjønås D, Myrseth E, Abbasy J, Alvi A, Saleem O, Afzal A, Nazir A, Farooq M, Liaqat A, Naqi SA, Raza A, Sarfraz M, Sarwar M, Banglani M, Munir A, Sehrish R, Ayub B, Sayyed R, Altaf A, Ayub S, Qureshi AU, Saeed K, Syed B, Akbar SA, Anwer AW, Khan RN, Khan AI, Khattak S, Mohtasham S, Parvaiz MA, Syed AA, Ansari AB, Shahzad N, Khaliq T, Rashid I, Waqar SH, Abu Al-saleem H, Abu Alqumboz A, Alqadi M, Amro A, Assa R, Awesat E, Ayyad R, Hammad M, Haymony A, Hijazi B, Hmeidat B, Lahaseh R, Qawasmi A, Rajabi A, Shehada M, Shkokani S, Yaghi Y, Yaghi N, AlZohour M, Farid M, Habes YM, Juba W, Nubani Y, Rabee A, Sa'deh M, Abed S, Al basos I, Alswerki M, Ashour D, Awad I, Diab S, El Jamassi A, El-Kahlout S, Elhout S, Hajjaj ANK, Hasanain D, Nabil hajjaj B, Obaid M, Saikaly E, Salhi A, Al-Tammam H, Almasri M, Baniowda M, Beshtawi D, Horoub A, Misk R, Mohammad B, Qasrawi R, Sholi T, Abu-Nimeh S, Abu-srour A, Abukhalaf SA, Adawi S, Alsalameh B, Ayesh K, Elqadi M, Hammouri A, Karim Mustafa F, Marzouqa N, Melhem S, Miqdad D, Mohamad B, Rawhi M, Abu Ahammala AB, Abu Ataya A, Abu Jayyab I, Al-Shwaikh S, Alagha O, Alasttal M, Awadallah H, Elblbessy M, Fares J, Jarbou A, Mahfouz I, Albahnasawi MA, Abo mahadi A, Abuelhatal H, Abuelqomboz A, Almoqayyad A, Alwali A, Balaawi R, Hamouda M, Humeid M, Jedyan A, Mahmoud Abu hamam T, Matar G, Salem A, Samra T, Shaheen N, Shihada K, A.Nemer A, Abu Al Amrain M, Abu Alamrain A, Abu Jamie N, Abu-Rous MR, Alfarra N, AlTaweel M, Alwhaidi N, Hamed R, Saqqa B, Shaheen A, Aljaber D, Aljaberi L, Alwaheidi M, Jawaada A, Khaldi H, Qahoush R, Qari J, Saadeh R, Salim A, Yacoub A, Abbas A, Abu shua`ib R, Abu Zainah B, AbuSirrees M, Babaa B, Barhoush O, Belal qadomi A, Daraghmeh L, Haji R, Khatatbeh A, Khatib L, Qarariah S, Quzmar Y, Safadi K, Salameh R, Hassan M, Herzallah S, Massad L, Nazzal A, Nazzal R, Escobar D, Machain V GM, Rodriguez Gonzalez A, Chachaima Mar JE, Chinchihualpa Paredes NO, Cuba V, Lopez W, Niquen Jimenez MM, Sanchez Bartra NA, Sapallanay Ojeda O, Sequeiros D, Toscano Pacheco A, Vergara M, Abarca S, Alcorta R, Borda-Luque G, Eusebio Zegarra IE, Luján López C, Marrufo M, Mogrovejo C, Nomura A, Rodríguez Angeles Y, Vidal Meza MR, Zavala G, Castillo Arrascue JN, Hidrogo Cabrera JC, Larrea vera JJM, Osorio M, Ylatoma Díaz EA, Fontanilla MA, Fuentes JR, Salazar AL, Dominguez G, Lopez MP, Macalindong S, Onglao MA, Ramirez A, Sacdalan MD, Tampo MM, Uy GL, Mangahas J, Yabut K, Cañete JP, Cansana BE, Castro EJ, Lipana MK, Roxas MF, Zara VJ, Chrol M, Franczak P, Orlowski M, Budzynski P, Budzynski A, Bury P, Czerwinska A, Dworak J, Dziedzic J, Kisielewski M, Kulawik J, Lasek A, Major P, Malczak P, Migaczewski M, Pedziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Radkowiak D, Rubinkiewicz M, Rzepa A, Skoczylas T, Stanek M, Truszkiewicz K, Wierdak M, Winiarski M, Zarzycki P, Zub-Pokrowiecka A, Kowalewski P, Roszkowski R, Waledziak M, Tomé M, Patrocinio S, Guerreiro I, Almeida F, de Sousa X, Monteiro N, Costa Santos MT, de Oliveira D, Lopes Serra M, Morgado D, Neves C, Oliveira AC, Pimentel A, Silva S, Carvalho M, Carvalho L, Magalhães J, Matos L, Monteiro T, Ramos C, Santos V, Barbosa J, Costa-Maia J, Devezas V, Fareleira A, Fernandes C, Gonçalves D, Mora H, Morais M, Silva de Sousa F, Catarino Santos S, Logrado A, Tojal A, Amorim E, Cunha MF, Fazenda A, Melo Neves JP, Sampaio da Nóvoa Gomes Miguel II, Veiga D, Azevedo J, Cardoso Louro H, Leite M, Azevedo J, Bairos Menezes M, Gama B, Brito D, Cruz Martins MC, Graça e Magalhães A, Longras AC, Lourenço R, Matos D, Castro L, Policarpo F, Romano J, Leite M, Monteiro C, Pinto D, Duarte M, Fortuna Martins S, Oliveira M, Galvão D, Martins L, Silva A, Taranu V, Vieira B, Neves J, Oliveira S, Ribeiro H, Cinza M, Felix R, Machado A, Oliveira J, Patrício J, Pedroso de Lima R, Pereira M, Rocha Melo M, Velez C, Abreu da Silva A, Claro M, Costa Santos D, Ferreira A, Capote H, Rosado D, Taré F, Nogueira O, Ângelo M, Baiao JM, Guimarães A, Marques J, Nico Albano M, Silva M, Valente da Costa A, Vieira Caroço T, Almeida Braga S, Capunge I, Fragoso M, Guimarães J, Pinto B, Ribeiro J, Angel M, Fialho G, Guerrero M, Campos Costa F, Cardoso D, Cardoso V, Alves M, Estalagem I, Louro T, Marques C, Martelo R, Morgado M, Canotilho R, Correia AM, Martins P, Peyroteo M, Gomes J, Monteiro R, Romano M, Alves DM, Peixoto R, Quintela C, Jervis MJ, Melo D, Pacheco A, Paixão V, Pedro V, Pimenta J, Pimenta de Castro J, Rocha A, Beuran M, Bratu MR, Ciubotaru C, Diaconescu B, Hostiuc S, Negoi I, Stoica B, NA NA, Anokhin E, Kuznetsov G, Oganezov G, Paramzin F, Romanova E, Rutkovskii V, Rutkovskii V, Shushval M, Zabiyaka M, Dzhumabaev K, Ivanov V, Mamedli Z, Achkasov S, Balkarov A, Nabiev E, Nagudov M, Rybakov E, Saifutdinova K, Sushkov O, Vardanyan A, Costas-Chavarri A, Joseph L, Ndayishimiye I, Allen Ingabire JC, Faustin N, Mutabazi AZ, Mvukiyehe JP, Nsengimana VJ, Uwakunda C, Abbas MM, Akeel N, Aljiffry M, Awaji K, Farsi A, Jamjoum G, Khoja A, Maghrabi A, Malibary N, Nassif M, Saleem A, Sultan A, Tashkandi W, Tashkandi H, Trabulsi N, Ba MB, Diallo AC, Ndong A, Cuk V, Jankovic U, Juloski J, Koh SZ, Koh F, Lee KC, Lee KY, Lee S, Leong WQ, Lieske B, Lui SA, Prakash P, Grosek J, Norcic G, Tomazic A, Fitchat N, Jaich R, Wineberg D, Koto MZ, Baiocchi D, Clarke D, Steenkamp CJ, Van Straten S, Bannister S, Boutall A, Chinnery G, Coccia A, Dell A, Karjiker P, Kloppers C, Loxton N, Mabogoane T, Malherbe F, Panieri E, Rayamajhi S, Spence R, van Wyngaard T, Warden C, Madiba TE, Moodley Y, Pillay N, Brooks S, Kruger C, Van Der Merwe LH, Gool F, Kariem M, Bougard H, Chu K, Kariem N, Noor F, Pillay R, Steynfaardt L, González González L, Marín Santos JM, Martín-Borregón P, Martínez Caballero J, Nevado García C, Rodriguez Fraga P, De Castro Parga G, Fernández Veiga MP, Garrido López L, Infante Pino H, Lages Cal I, López Otero M, Nogueira Sixto M, Paniagua García Señorans M, Rodríguez Fernández L, Ruano Poblador A, Rufo Crespo E, Sanchez-Santos R, Vigorita V, Alonso Batanero E, Asnel D, Cifrian Canales I, Contreras Saiz E, De Santiago Alvarez I, Díaz Vico T, Fernandez Arias S, Fernández Martínez D, García Bernardo C, García Flórez LJ, Garcia Gutierrez C, García Munar M, Márquez Zorrilla Molina CA, Merayo M, Michi Campos JL, Moreno Gijon M, Otero-Diez JL, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Solar-Garcia L, Suárez Sánchez A, Truan N, Alejandre Villalobos C, Caballero Díaz Y, Jimenez M, Montesdeoca D, Navarro-Sánchez A, Vega V, Beltrán de Heredia J, Gómez Z, Jezieniecki C, Legido Morán AP, Montes-Manrique M, Rodriguez-Lopez M, Ruiz Soriano M, Trujillo Díaz J, Vazquez Fernandez A, Argudo N, Pera M, Torrent Jansà L, García Domínguez M, Goded I, Roldón Golet M, Talal El-Abur I, Utrilla Fornals A, Zambrana Campos V, Aguilar Martinez MDM, Bosch M, García-Catalá L, Sánchez-Guillén L, Artigau E, Gomez Romeu N, Julià Bergkvist D, Espina Perez B, Morató O, Olona C, Diéguez B, Forero-Torres A, Losada M, Gomez-Abril S, Gonzálvez P, Martinez R, Navarro Martínez S, Payá-Llorente C, Pérez Rubio Á, Santarrufina Martinez S, Sebastián Tomás JC, Trullenque Juan R, Gegúndez Simón A, Maté P, Prieto-Nieto MI, Rubio-Perez I, Urbieta A, Vicario Bravo M, Abelló D, Frasson M, Garcia-Granero A, Abad Gurumeta A, Abad-Motos A, Lucena-de Pablo E, Nozal B, Ripollés-Melchor J, Salvachúa R, Ferrero E, Garcia-Sancho Tellez L, Ortega Vázquez I, Picardo AL, Rojo López JA, Zorrilla Matilla LP, Cagigas Fernandez C, Castanedo Bezanilla S, Estevez Tesouro J, Fernandez-Diaz MJ, García Cardo J, Gomez Ruiz M, Gonzalez-Tolaretxipi E, Jimeno Fraile J, Poch C, Rodriguez-Aguirre M, Troche Pesqueira N, Trugeda-Carrera MS, de la Torre J, Blanco-Colino R, Espin-Basany E, Espinosa-Bravo M, Morales Comas C, Reyes Afonso E, Rivero Déniz J, Siso Raber C, Verdaguer Tremolosa M, Chandrasinghe P, Kumarage S, Wijekoon Arachchilage N, Senanayake KJ, Abdalla Ahmed Elkamel A, A. Adam M, Saleh M, Blomme N, Thorell A, Wogensen F, Älgå A, Ansarei D, Celebioglu F, Heinius G, Nigard L, Pieniowski E, Ahlqvist S, Björklund I, Cengiz Y, Frånberg A, Håkansson M, Adamo K, Franklin O, Sund M, Wiberg R, Andersson Y, Chabok A, Nikberg M, Kugelberg A, Canonica C, Christoforidis D, Fasolini F, Gaffuri P, Giuliani M, Meani F, Popeskou SG, Pozza S, Wandschneider W, Peterer L, Widmer LW, Zimmermann B, Bakoleas P, Chanousi I, Charalampidou L, Grochola LF, Heid F, Ntaoulas S, Outos M, Peros G, Podolska-Skoczek H, Reinisch KB, Zielasek C, Clerc D, Demartines N, Gilgien J, Kefleyesus A, St-Amour P, Toussaint A, Alhimyar M, Alsaid B, Alyafi A, Alkhaledi A, Kouz B, Omarain A, Al-Sabbagh Y, Alkhatib H, Sara S, Alhaj A, Danial A, Kadoura L, Maa Albared S, Monawar Y, Nahas L, Abd B, Saad A, Wakkaf H, Bouaziz H, Bouzaiene H, Ghalleb M, Akaydin E, Akbaba AC, Atakul O, Baltaci E, Besli S, Burgu G, Cenal U, de Muijnck C, Demirkaya HC, Dogruoz A, Gezer ZI, Gündogdu Y, Kara M, Korkmaz HK, Kurtoglu GK, Ozben V, Ozmen BB, Pektas AM, Sel EK, Yenidünya N, Bengur FB, Oral BM, Yozgatli TK, Abdullayev S, Gunes ME, Sahbaz NA, Banaz T, Kargici K, Kuyumcu OF, Yanikoglu E, Yesilsancak M, Yilmaz D, Aktas MK, Rencuzogullari A, Isik A, Leventoglu S, Yalçinkaya A, Yüksel O, Kalayci MU, Kara Y, Sarici IS, Akin A, Alemdag GN, Arslan E, Baki BE, Bodur MS, Calik A, Candas Altinbas B, Cihanyurdu I, Erkul O, Gül B, Guner A, Köse B, Semiz A, Sevim S, Tayar S, Tomas K, Tüfek OY, Türkyilmaz S, Ulusahin M, Usta A, Yildirim R, Güler SA, Tatar OC, Varol E, Kirimtay B, Uysal M, Yildiz A, Kose E, Ciftci AB, Çolak E, Eraslan H, Kucuk GO, Yemez K, Lule H, Bienfait M, Lule H, Bua E, Doe M, Okalany N, Birindelli A, Basarab M, Bielosludtsev O, Freigofer M, Kolhanova K, Perepelytsia K, Romanukha K, Savenkov D, Siryi S, Tereshchenko M, Viacheslav N, Volovetskyi A, Kebkalo A, Tryliskyy Y, Tyselskiy V, Bruce E, Chow BL, Iddles E, McGuckin S, Newall N, Ramsay G, Sharma P, Stewart C, Wong J, Badran A, Bath M, Belais F, Butt E, Joshi K, Kapur M, Shaw M, Townson A, Williams CYK, Gray T, Greig R, Husain M, Murray E, Mustafa A, Asif A, Gokul A, Shah M, Akitikori MT, Charalabopoulos A, Davidson S, McNally S, Rupani S, Juma F, Mills SC, Muirhead L, Sellars K, Walsh U, Warren O, Chambers A, Hunt R, Teasdale E, Boyce S, Cornwall H, Tol I, Argyriou EO, Eardley N, Povey M, Aithie JMS, Irfan A, McGuigan MC, Starr R, Warren CR, Archibald J, Kirby G, Kisyov I, Khoo CK, Lee R, Photiou D, Davis R, Prasad U, Yang PZ, Bird J, Leung E, Summerour V, Currow C, Kiam J, Tan GJS, Muthusami A, Pegba-Otemolu I, Urbonas T, Nunoo-Mensah J, Smolskas E, Boddy A, Gravante G, Hunter D, Andrew D, Koh A, Thompson A, Adams L, Clements HA, De Silva K, Ekpete O, Haque S, Henderson S, Ibrahim B, Jayasinghe T, Livie J, Mailley K, Nair G, Tan D, Baggaley C, Dawidziuk A, Szyszka B, Barter C, Gandhi N, Hassell K, Hitchin S, Kelsall J, Nagy E, Nessa A, Whisker L, Yanni F, Ali M, Arora D, Hediwattege S, Kumarasinghe N, Rathore M, Tennakoon A, Ali Ahmad SM, Bajomo O, Nadira F, Celentano V, Bhangu A, Glasbey J, Griffiths E, Karri RS, Mak JKC, Nepogodiev D, Pipe M, Bhatti MI, Rabie M, Boyle C, Hamilton D, Mihuna A, Ng JCK, Nicholson G, Oliwa A, Pearson R, Rose A, Yong SQ, Boereboom C, Hanna M, Walter C, Greensmith TS, Mitchell R, Monaghan E, Crawford J, Moug S, Blackwell J, Boyd-Carson H, Herrod P, Al-Allaf O, Beattie M, Bullock C, Burman S, Clark G, Flamey N, Flannery O, Harding A, Kodiatt B, Lawday S, Mahapatra S, Mukundu Nagesh N, Ng M, Rye D, Yoong A, Clark L, Deans C, Edirisooriya M, Fairfield CJ, Harrison EM, Carrington EV, Wong TLE, Yusuf B, Chamberlain C, Duke K, Kmiotek E, Botes A, Condie N, Schrire T, Shah R, Thomas-Jones I, Yates C, Anthony N, Matthews E, Sahnan K, Tankel J, Tucker S, Winter Beatty J, Ziprin P, Duggan W, Kantartzi A, Sridhar S, Khaw RA, Srivastava P, Underwood C, Alves do Canto Brum H, Chopra S, Davis L, Hughes R, Tulley J, Alberts J, Athisayaraj T, Olugbemi M, Ahmad K, Chan C, Chapman G, Fleming H, Fox B, Grewar J, Hulse K, Rutherford D, Sinead M, Smith S, Speake D, Vaughan-Shaw PG, Christodoulides N, Kudhail S, Welch M, Husaini SM, Lambracos S, Anyanwu C, Suresh R, Thomas JS, Gleeson E, Platoff R, Saif A, Enumah Z, Etchill E, Gabre-Kidan A, Bernstein M, Carrano FM, Connors J, Lynn P, Melis M, Newman E, Foster DS, Perrone K, Titan A, Weiser TG, Ahmad S, Bafford ACM, Dal Molin M, Hanna N, Zafar SN, Hemmila M, Napolitano L, Wong JJ, Chandler J, Wood L, Wren S, Ottesen T, You L, Yu K, Arciénega Yañez MDP, Ferreira Fernandes M, González D, Cubas S, González MC, Zubiaurre V, Demolin R, Giroff N, Sciuto P, Campos M, Rodríguez Cantera G, Wagner G, Deepika G, Maimbo M, Simuchimba E, Bulaya A, Chibuye C, Chirengendure B, Kabale MR, Kabongo K, Linyama D, Munthali J, Mweso O, Pikiti F, Otieno J, Chan E, Lai LT, Blackman B, Richards S, Subramaniam S, Karim R, Kok N, Lee YD, Ali S, Sinha A, Corrigan R, Barnes N, Wong F, Dennis G, Jedamzik J, Phillips E, Piette W, Van hentenryck M, Koco H, Lawani S, Kassa MW, Santos Bezerra T, Gribnev P, Dimitrov D, Krastev P, Oum S, Bonghaseh DT, Al Farsi M, Alsharqawi N, Agarwal A, Acevedo V, Castillo Barbosa AC, Giron F, Leon Rodriguez JP, Kucan D, Rosko D, Barsic N, Župan D, Hegazi A, Truncíková V, Fryba V, Mohamed M, Sultan A, Nagi A, Rashad Temerik A, Elshawy ME, Mahmoud MI, Omar S, Anwar M, Rageh T, Elmokadem A, Gaballa K, Teppo S, Turunen A, Pengermä P, Ballouhey Q, Bergeat D, Weyl A, Hain E, Gyedu A, Yenli E, Osei-Poku D, Rompou VA, Zoikas A, Gaitanidis A, Koukis G, Perivoliotis K, Tavlas P, Galanos-Demiris K, Zografos G, Karavokyros I, Xanthopoulou G, Iordanidou E, Ayau F, Garcia A, Damján P, Wason D, B L A, Rangganata E, Kamath P, O'Connor DB, Pinto M, Perrone F, Tropeano FP, Troilo F, Bossi D, Scala D, Pulitanò L, Carella M, Pietrabissa A, Gori A, Giraudo G, De Simone V, Russo AA, Braccio B, Al-Taher R, Athamneh S, Parker A, Sawiee A, Kattia A, Salem M, Tababa O, Shaeeb Z, Syminas V, Jurgaitis J, Damuleviciene G, Svagzdys S, Poskus T, Razafimanjato NNM, Chieng Loo L, Tiong IC, Wan Muhmad WF, Vijeyan H, Li Ying T, Grech G, Arrangoiz R, Jimenez Ley VB, Arizpe D, Jimenez Ley VB, Lagunes Lara E, Castro López EV, Eaazim J, Gordinou de Gouberville M, Bastiaenen V, Rottier S, Nahab F, Ji MY, Seyoji M, Nwachukwu C, Emeghara O, Muhammed SE, Idowu A, Sowemimo O, Ogundoyin O, Akande O, Lott A, Nadeem M, Laghari AA, Loya A, Mushtaq H, Abdullah MT, Abuhilal B, Atawneh M, Hamdan H, Alhabil B, Srour A, Mousa I, Da Silva Medina L, Sacdalan MD, Lapitan MC, Sacdalan MD, Sacdalan MD, Bartosiak K, Ferreira P, Francisco V, Lemos R, Frutuoso L, Fernandes S, Fonseca T, Pereira J, Rachadell J, Torre A, Madeira Martins F, Carvalho AC, Rodrigues Ferreira J, Ribeiro da Silva B, Devesa H, Vieira A, Mónica I, Amaro M, Sousa D, Reia M, Louro J, Martins A, Dominguez J, Santos I, Freitas Oliveira NM, Pereira JC, Silva-Vaz P, Freire L, Escrevente R, Negoita VM, Shakhmatov D, Nezerwa Y, Radulovic R, Moore R, Obery G, Viljoen F, Mendes T, Suarez A, Moncada E, Fernandez-Hevia M, Curtis Martínez C, Gil Garcia JM, González Zunzarren M, Idris T, Eklöv K, Grahn O, Amin L, Blomqvist M, Ajani C, Kraus R, Seeger N, Willemin M, Rayya F, Ayash M, Msouti R, Kannas I, Abazid E, Esper A, Slim S, Kavcar AS, Aytac E, Dural AC, Ilker A, Eray IC, Kurnaz E, Altiner S, Tepe MD, Sahin C, Savli E, Innocent A, Babirye L, Diachenko A, Hordoskiy V, Curry H, Chau CYC, Robertson H, Mahmoud A, Lennon H, Loi L, Kirkham E, McCann C, Watts D, Gurung B, Wilson M, Tribedi T, Garofalo E, Zahra B, MacDonald S, Daniels I, Ng N, Khosla S, Olivier J, Yue SYP, Suresh G, Wellington J, Lorejo E, Mossaad M, Tryliskyy Y, Crutcher M, Alimi M, Baiu I, Abdou H, Conway A, Peck C, Wagner G, Perdomo Perez MA, Trostchansky I, Zulu S, Nakazwe M, Knight SR, Drake TM, Nepogodiev D, Fitzgerald JE, Ademuyiwa A, Alexander P, Ingabire JA, Al-Saqqa SW, Biccard BM, Borda-Luque G, Borowski DW, Burger S, Chu K, Clarke D, Costas-Chavarri A, Davies J, Donaldson R, Ede C, Garden OJ, Ghosh D, Glasbey J, Kingham TP, Salem HK, Anyomih TTK, Koto MZ, Lapitan MC, Lawani I, Lesetedi C, Aguilera-Arevalo ML, Mabedi C, Maimbo M, Magill L, Makinde Alakaloko F, Makupe A, Martin J, Ramos-De la Medina A, Monahan M, Moore R, Msosa V, Mulira S, Mutabazi AZ, Muller E, Musowoyo J, Adisa AO, Olory-Togbe JL, Pius R, Qureshi AU, Rayne S, Roberts T, Sacdalan MD, Shaw CA, Smart N, Smith M, Spence R, Van Straten S, Tabiri S, Tayler V, Weiser TG, Windsor J, Yorke J, Yepez R, Lilford R, Morton D, Bhangu A, Sundar S, Harrison EM, Runigamugabo E, Verjee A, Chen J, Daya L, El Aroussi N, Farina V, Gnintedeme Olivier T, Gonzales Nacarino M, Hammani A, Honjo S, Jacobs R, Kimura H, Litvin A, Nkoronko M, Nour I, Oscullo Yepez JJ, Pagano G, Pata F, Pin Hung W, Raj A, Romani Pozo A, Rommaneh M, Sassamela Fabiano SC, Shiroma Gago CM, Shu Yip S, Srinivas A, Sung CY, Tai A, Valle Aranda YC, Venturini S, Vervoort D, Wilguens Lartigue J. Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

BACKGROUND

80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494.

FINDINGS

Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70-8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39-8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11-3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26-11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08-7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications.

INTERPRETATION

Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit.

Surgical Prevention of Anastomotic Recurrence by Excluding Mesentery in Crohn's Disease: The SuPREMe-CD Study - A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

This trial aimed to provide randomized controlled data comparing Kono-S anastomosis and stapled ileocolic side-to-side anastomosis.

BACKGROUND

Recently, a new antimesenteric, functional, end-to-end, hand-sewn ileocolic anastomosis (Kono-S) has shown a significant reduction in endoscopic recurrence score and surgical recurrence rate in Crohn disease (CD).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial (RCT) at a tertiary referral institution. Primary endpoint: endoscopic recurrence (ER) (Rutgeerts score ≥i2) after 6 months. Secondary endpoints: clinical recurrence (CR) after 12 and 24 months, ER after 18 months, and surgical recurrence (SR) after 24 months.

RESULTS

In all, 79 ileocolic CD patients were randomized in Kono group (36) and Conventional group (43). After 6 months, 22.2% in the Kono group and 62.8% in the Conventional group presented an ER [P < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) 5.91]. A severe postoperative ER (Rutgeerts score ≥i3) was found in 13.8% of Kono versus 34.8% of Conventional group patients (P = 0.03, OR 3.32). CR rate was 8% in the Kono group versus 18% in the Conventional group after 12 months (P = 0.2), and 18% versus 30.2% after 24 months (P = 0.04, OR 3.47). SR rate after 24 months was 0% in the Kono group versus 4.6% in the Conventional group (P = 0.3). Patients with Kono-S anastomosis presented a longer time until CR than patients with side-to-side anastomosis (hazard ratio 0.36, P = 0.037). On binary logistic regression analysis, the Kono-S anastomosis was the only variable significantly associated with a reduced risk of ER (OR 0.19, P < 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first RCT comparing Kono-S anastomosis and standard anastomosis in CD. The results demonstrate a significant reduction in postoperative endoscopic and clinical recurrence rate for patients who underwent Kono-S anastomosis, and no safety issues.ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02631967.

Global attitudes in the management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic: ACIE Appy Study

Background

Surgical strategies are being adapted to face the COVID‐19 pandemic. Recommendations on the management of acute appendicitis have been based on expert opinion, but very little evidence is available. This study addressed that dearth with a snapshot of worldwide approaches to appendicitis.

Methods

The Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe designed an online survey to assess the current attitude of surgeons globally regarding the management of patients with acute appendicitis during the pandemic. Questions were divided into baseline information, hospital organization and screening, personal protective equipment, management and surgical approach, and patient presentation before versus during the pandemic.

Results

Of 744 answers, 709 (from 66 countries) were complete and were included in the analysis. Most hospitals were treating both patients with and those without COVID. There was variation in screening indications and modality used, with chest X‐ray plus molecular testing (PCR) being the commonest (19·8 per cent). Conservative management of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis was used by 6·6 and 2·4 per cent respectively before, but 23·7 and 5·3 per cent, during the pandemic (both P < 0·001). One‐third changed their approach from laparoscopic to open surgery owing to the popular (but evidence‐lacking) advice from expert groups during the initial phase of the pandemic. No agreement on how to filter surgical smoke plume during laparoscopy was identified. There was an overall reduction in the number of patients admitted with appendicitis and one‐third felt that patients who did present had more severe appendicitis than they usually observe.

Conclusion

Conservative management of mild appendicitis has been possible during the pandemic. The fact that some surgeons switched to open appendicectomy may reflect the poor guidelines that emanated in the early phase of SARS‐CoV‐2.

Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare early postoperative outcomes after transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair with open (oTAR) and robotic (rTAR) approach.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify comparative studies until October 2020. A meta-analysis of postoperative short-term outcomes was performed including complications rate, operative time, length of stay, surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring intervention (SSOPI), systemic complications, readmission, and reoperation rates as measure outcomes.

RESULTS

Six retrospective studies were included in the analysis with a total of 831 patients who underwent rTAR (n = 237) and oTAR (n = 594). Robotic TAR was associated with lower risk of complications rate (9.3 vs 20.7%, OR 0.358, 95% CI 0.218-0.589, p < 0.001), lower risk of developing SSO (5.3 vs 11.5%, OR 0.669, 95% CI 0.307-1.458, p = 0.02), lower risk of developing systemic complications (6.3 vs 26.5%, OR 0.208, 95% CI 0.100-0.433, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD - 4.409, 95% CI - 6.000 to - 2.818, p < 0.001) but longer operative time (SMD 53.115, 95% CI 30.236-75.993, p < 0.01) compared with oTAR. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of SSI, SSOPI, readmission, and reoperation rates.

CONCLUSION

Robotic TAR improves recovery by adding the benefits of minimally invasive procedures when compared to open surgery. Although postoperative complications appear to decrease with a robotic approach, further studies are needed to support the real long-term and cost-effective advantages.

Safety and efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce ileus after colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Ileus is common after elective colorectal surgery, and is associated with increased adverse events and prolonged hospital stay. The aim was to assess the role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for reducing ileus after surgery.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre cohort study was delivered by an international, student- and trainee-led collaborative group. Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between January and April 2018 were included. The primary outcome was time to gastrointestinal recovery, measured using a composite measure of bowel function and tolerance to oral intake. The impact of NSAIDs was explored using Cox regression analyses, including the results of a centre-specific survey of compliance to enhanced recovery principles. Secondary safety outcomes included anastomotic leak rate and acute kidney injury.

RESULTS

A total of 4164 patients were included, with a median age of 68 (i.q.r. 57-75) years (54·9 per cent men). Some 1153 (27·7 per cent) received NSAIDs on postoperative days 1-3, of whom 1061 (92·0 per cent) received non-selective cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors. After adjustment for baseline differences, the mean time to gastrointestinal recovery did not differ significantly between patients who received NSAIDs and those who did not (4·6 versus 4·8 days; hazard ratio 1·04, 95 per cent c.i. 0·96 to 1·12; P = 0·360). There were no significant differences in anastomotic leak rate (5·4 versus 4·6 per cent; P = 0·349) or acute kidney injury (14·3 versus 13·8 per cent; P = 0·666) between the groups. Significantly fewer patients receiving NSAIDs required strong opioid analgesia (35·3 versus 56·7 per cent; P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

NSAIDs did not reduce the time for gastrointestinal recovery after colorectal surgery, but they were safe and associated with reduced postoperative opioid requirement.

Elective surgery system strengthening: development, measurement, and validation of the surgical preparedness index across 1632 hospitals in 119 countries

BACKGROUND

The 2015 Lancet Commission on global surgery identified surgery and anaesthesia as indispensable parts of holistic health-care systems. However, COVID-19 exposed the fragility of planned surgical services around the world, which have also been neglected in pandemic recovery planning. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel index to support local elective surgical system strengthening and address growing backlogs.

METHODS

First, we performed an international consultation through a four-stage consensus process to develop a multidomain index for hospital-level assessment (surgical preparedness index; SPI). Second, we measured surgical preparedness across a global network of hospitals in high-income countries (HICs), middle-income countries (MICs), and low-income countries (LICs) to explore the distribution of the SPI at national, subnational, and hospital levels. Finally, using COVID-19 as an example of an external system shock, we compared hospitals' SPI to their planned surgical volume ratio (SVR; ie, operations for which the decision for surgery was made before hospital admission), calculated as the ratio of the observed surgical volume over a 1-month assessment period between June 6 and Aug 5, 2021, against the expected surgical volume based on hospital administrative data from the same period in 2019 (ie, a pre-pandemic baseline). A linear mixed-effects regression model was used to determine the effect of increasing SPI score.

FINDINGS

In the first phase, from a longlist of 103 candidate indicators, 23 were prioritised as core indicators of elective surgical system preparedness by 69 clinicians (23 [33%] women; 46 [67%] men; 41 from HICs, 22 from MICs, and six from LICs) from 32 countries. The multidomain SPI included 11 indicators on facilities and consumables, two on staffing, two on prioritisation, and eight on systems. Hospitals were scored from 23 (least prepared) to 115 points (most prepared). In the second phase, surgical preparedness was measured in 1632 hospitals by 4714 clinicians from 119 countries. 745 (45·6%) of 1632 hospitals were in MICs or LICs. The mean SPI score was 84·5 (95% CI 84·1-84·9), which varied between HIC (88·5 [89·0-88·0]), MIC (81·8 [82·5-81·1]), and LIC (66·8 [64·9-68·7]) settings. In the third phase, 1217 (74·6%) hospitals did not maintain their expected SVR during the COVID-19 pandemic, of which 625 (51·4%) were from HIC, 538 (44·2%) from MIC, and 54 (4·4%) from LIC settings. In the mixed-effects model, a 10-point increase in SPI corresponded to a 3·6% (95% CI 3·0-4·1; p<0·0001) increase in SVR. This was consistent in HIC (4·8% [4·1-5·5]; p<0·0001), MIC (2·8 [2·0-3·7]; p<0·0001), and LIC (3·8 [1·3-6·7%]; p<0·0001) settings.

INTERPRETATION

The SPI contains 23 indicators that are globally applicable, relevant across different system stressors, vary at a subnational level, and are collectable by front-line teams. In the case study of COVID-19, a higher SPI was associated with an increased planned surgical volume ratio independent of country income status, COVID-19 burden, and hospital type. Hospitals should perform annual self-assessment of their surgical preparedness to identify areas that can be improved, create resilience in local surgical systems, and upscale capacity to address elective surgery backlogs.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery, NIHR Academy, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel Research UK, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, and Medtronic.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in learning curve: Role of implementation of a standardized technique and recovery protocol. A cohort study

Background

Despite the proven benefits, laparoscopic colorectal surgery is still under utilized among surgeons. A steep learning is one of the causes of its limited adoption. Aim of the study is to determine the feasibility and morbidity rate after laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a single institution, “learning curve” experience, implementing a well standardized operative technique and recovery protocol.

Methods

The first 50 patients treated laparoscopically were included. All the procedures were performed by a trainee surgeon, supervised by a consultant surgeon, according to the principle of complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation or TME. Patients underwent a fast track recovery programme. Recovery parameters, short-term outcomes, morbidity and mortality have been assessed.

Results

Type of resections: 20 left side resections, 8 right side resections, 14 low anterior resection/TME, 5 total colectomy and IRA, 3 total panproctocolectomy and pouch. Mean operative time: 227 min; mean number of lymph-nodes: 18.7. Conversion rate: 8%. Mean time to flatus: 1.3 days; Mean time to solid stool: 2.3 days. Mean length of hospital stay: 7.2 days. Overall morbidity: 24%; major morbidity (Dindo–Clavien III): 4%. No anastomotic leak, no mortality, no 30-days readmission.

Conclusion

Proper laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and leads to excellent results in terms of recovery and short term outcomes, even in a learning curve setting. Key factors for better outcomes and shortening the learning curve seem to be the adoption of a standardized technique and training model along with the strict supervision of an expert colorectal surgeon.

•

Benefits from laparoscopic colorectal surgery have been widely demonstrated.

•

A steep learning curve is considered the main limitation to its adoption.

•

We present short-term outcomes in a learning curve prospective series.

•

A modular, stepwise approach leads to excellent results.

•

Even trainees can safely learn both laparoscopic and open surgery, when strictly supervised.

Intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in rectal cancer surgery: The state of the art

Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is widely used in abdominal surgery. The implementation of minimally invasive rectal surgery using new methods like robotics or a transanal approach required improvement of optical systems. In that setting, ICG fluorescence optimizes intraoperative vision of anatomical structures by improving blood and lymphatic flow. The purpose of this review was to summarize all potential applications of this upcoming technology in rectal cancer surgery. Each type of use has been separately addressed and the evidence was investigated. During rectal resection, ICG fluorescence angiography is mainly used to evaluate the perfusion of the colonic stump in order to reduce the risk of anastomotic leaks. In addition, ICG fluorescence imaging allows easy visualization of organs such as the ureter or urethra to protect them from injury. This intraoperative technology is a valuable tool for conducting lymph node dissection along the iliac lymphatic chain or to better identifying the rectal dissection planes when a transanal approach is performed. This is an overview of the applications of ICG fluorescence imaging in current surgical practice and a synthesis of the results obtained from the literature. Although further studies are need to investigate the real clinical benefits, these findings may enhance use of ICG fluorescence in current clinical practice and stimulate future research on new applications.

Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia is a key component of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for postoperative pain management. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has contributed to the implementation of this approach in different kinds of surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TAP block and its impact on recovery in colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases was conducted. Studies that compared TAP block to a control group (no TAP block or placebo) after colorectal resections were included. The effects of TAP block in patients undergoing colorectal surgery were assessed, including the technical aspects of the procedure. Two measures were used to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative pain control: a numeric pain rating score at rest and on coughing or movement at 24 h following surgery and the opioid requirement at 24 h. Clinical aspects of recovery were postoperative ileus, surgical site infection, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in the analysis. Data showed that TAP block is a safe procedure associated with a significant reduction in the pain score at rest [WMD - 0.91 (95% CI - 1.56; - 0.27); p < 0.05] and on coughing or movement [WMD - 0.36 (95% CI - 0.72; - 0.01); p < 0.05] at 24 h after surgery and a significant decrease in morphine consumption in the TAP block group the day after surgery [WMD - 2.07 (95% CI - 2.63; - 1.51); p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

TAP block appears to provide both an effective analgesia and a significant reduction in opioid use on the first postoperative day after colorectal surgery. Its use does not seem to lead to increased postoperative complications.

Risk of appendiceal neoplasm after interval appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-operative management is often the treatment of choice in cases of complicated appendicitis and routine interval appendectomy is not usually recommended. Actually, recent studies show an alarming number of appendiceal neoplasms following interval appendectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of appendiceal neoplasms and their histological types after interval appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in adults.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Studies reporting appendiceal neoplasm rates after interval appendectomy and histopathological characteristics were included. The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification of malignant tumours was considered. A pooled prevalence analysis for both prevalence and pathology was performed.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies was included: seven retrospective series and one randomized controlled trial. The pooled prevalence of neoplasms after interval appendectomy was 11% (95% CI 7-15; I² = 37.5%, p = 0.13). Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms occurred in 43% (95% CI 19-68), adenocarcinoma in 29% (95% CI 6-51), appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasm in 21% (95% CI 6-36), globet cell carcinoma in 13% (95% CI -2-28), adenoma or serrated lesions in 20% (95% CI -0-41) of cases.

CONCLUSION

The risk of appendiceal neoplasm in patients treated with interval appendectomy for complicated appendicitis is 11%; mucinous neoplasm is the most common histopathological type. Further studies should investigate this association in order to clarify the biological pathway and clinical implications.

Gastrocolic trunk of Henle and its variants: review of the literature and clinical relevance in colectomy for right-sided colon cancer

PURPOSE

Venous vascular anatomy of the right colon presents a high degree of variability. Henle's Gastrocolic Trunk is considered an important anatomical landmark by colorectal surgeons. The classical description concerns a bipod vascular structure or tripod, but several variants are associated to it. The aim of this study is to merge the most updated literature on the anatomy knowledge of the Gastrocolic Trunk by evaluating all possible variants, as well as to underline its surgical importance due to its topographical relationships.

METHODS

Twelve studies describing the anatomy of the gastrocolic trunk were selected, each of them dealing with a more or less extensive series of cases. A distinction was drawn between the gastropancreatic trunk, devoid of the colonic component, and the gastrocolic trunk; and then the frequency of the different resulting variants was reported. The data obtained from cadavers and radiological studies were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

The Gastrocolic Trunk is found in 74% of cadaver studies, and in 86% of radiological studies. Its most frequent configuration is represented by the union of right gastroepiploic vein + anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein + superior right colic vein, respectively, 32.5% and 42.5%, followed by the right colic vein which replaces (26.9%, 12.3%) or is added (10%, 20.1%) to the superior right colic vein.

CONCLUSIONS

The superior right colic vein joins the right gastroepiploic vein and the anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein thus forming, in most cases, the gastrocolic trunk. The anatomical knowledge of vascular structures forms the basis for both the interpretation of preoperative radiological images and the surgical procedure itself, despite the considerable anatomical variability of tributaries.

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

BACKGROUND

Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres.

METHODS

This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low-middle-income countries.

RESULTS

In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of 'single-use' consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low-middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia.

CONCLUSION

This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high- and low-middle-income countries.

Early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes

PURPOSE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to answer whether early closure of defunctioning ileostomy may be suitable after low anterior resection.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, up to October 2021, for RCTs comparing early closure (EC ≤ 30 days) and delayed closure (DC ≥ 60 days) of defunctioning ileostomy. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI was calculated for dichotomous variables and the mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous variables. The GRADE methodology was implemented for assessing Quality of Evidence (QoE). TSA was implemented to address the risk of random error associated with sparse data and/or multiple testing.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included for quantitative synthesis. 599 patients were allocated to either EC (n = 306) or DC (n = 293). EC was associated with a higher rate of wound complications compared to DC (RR 2.56; 95% CI 1.33 to 4.93; P = 0.005; I² = 0%, QoE High), a lower incidence of postoperative small bowel obstruction (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.89; P = 0.02; I² = 0%, QoE moderate), and a lower rate of stoma-related complications (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%, QoE moderate). The rate of minor low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.55 to 2.33; P = 0.74; I² = 0%, QoE low) and major LARS (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.09; P = 0.16; I² = 0%, QoE low) did not differ between the two groups. TSA demonstrated inconclusive evidence with insufficient sample sizes to detect the observed effects.

CONCLUSION

EC may confer some advantages compared with a DC. However, TSA advocated a cautious interpretation of the results.

PROSPERO REGISTER ID

CRD42021276557.

Age and comorbidities do not affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in elderly patients. A multi-institutional cohort study in 287 patients

Postoperative complications and mortality rates after rectal cancer surgery are higher in elderly than in non-elderly patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether, like in open surgery, age and comorbidities affect postoperative outcomes limiting the benefits of a laparoscopic approach. Between April 2011 and July 2020, data of 287 patients with rectal cancer submitted to laparoscopic rectal resection from different institutions were collected in an electronic database and were categorized into two groups: < 75 years and ≥ 75 years of age. Perioperative data and short-term outcomes were compared between these groups. Risk factors for postoperative complications were determined on multivariate analysis, including age groups and previous comorbidities as variables. Seventy-seven elderly patients had both higher ASA scores (p < 0.001) and cardiovascular disease rates (p = 0.02) compared with 210 non-elderly patients. There were no significative differences between groups in terms of overall postoperative complications (p = 0.3), number of patients with complications (p = 0.2), length of stay (p = 0.2) and death during hospitalization (p = 0.9). The only independent variables correlated with postoperative morbidity were male gender (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.53-3.68, p < 0.01) and low-medium localization of the tumor (OR 2.12; 75% CI 1.43-4.21, p < 0.01). Although older people are more frail patients, short-term postoperative outcomes in patients ≥ 75 years of age were similar to those of younger patients after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic rectal resection as well as non-elderly patient, despite advanced age and comorbidities.

Safety of hospital discharge before return of bowel function after elective colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Ileus is common after colorectal surgery and is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Identifying features of normal bowel recovery and the appropriateness for hospital discharge is challenging. This study explored the safety of hospital discharge before the return of bowel function.

METHODS

A prospective, multicentre cohort study was undertaken across an international collaborative network. Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between January and April 2018 were included. The main outcome of interest was readmission to hospital within 30 days of surgery. The impact of discharge timing according to the return of bowel function was explored using multivariable regression analysis. Other outcomes were postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery, measured using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

RESULTS

A total of 3288 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 301 (9·2 per cent) were discharged before the return of bowel function. The median duration of hospital stay for patients discharged before and after return of bowel function was 5 (i.q.r. 4-7) and 7 (6-8) days respectively (P < 0·001). There were no significant differences in rates of readmission between these groups (6·6 versus 8·0 per cent; P = 0·499), and this remained the case after multivariable adjustment for baseline differences (odds ratio 0·90, 95 per cent c.i. 0·55 to 1·46; P = 0·659). Rates of postoperative complications were also similar in those discharged before versus after return of bowel function (minor: 34·7 versus 39·5 per cent; major 3·3 versus 3·4 per cent; P = 0·110).

CONCLUSION

Discharge before return of bowel function after elective colorectal surgery appears to be safe in appropriately selected patients.

Local excision following chemoradiotherapy in T2-T3 rectal cancer: current status and critical appraisal

Local excision following chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer is an organ-preserving procedure which aims at reducing morbidity and functional disorders associated with total mesorectal excision (TME) in selected patients. Although TME after chemoradiotherapy remains the gold standard for locally advanced mid and low rectal cancer, in the last years multicenter research trials have offered encouraging oncologic results which have allowed to preserve the rectum in patients with a pathologic complete response after chemoradiotherapy. A review of the available literature on this topic was conducted to define the state of the art of this conservative approach and to focus on the most controversial aspects concerning local excision performed after chemoradiotherapy, in particular tumor scatter and lymph node status, completion and salvage surgery, morbidity and quality of life. The analysis of these topics should be considered, in trial setting or in current practice, for their clinical implications. Oncologic outcomes of recent trials are encouraging for part of the patients presenting T2 rectal cancer; however, TME still remains the standard treatment in clinical practice. In such cases, local excision should include a surgical safety margin of at least 1 cm from the resection margin to achieve a true negative margin from residual tumor cells. The selection of the patients should be carefully performed and their consensus extremely detailed because TME is necessary in about 30% of cases. Failing that, morbidity and quality of life are negatively affected. However, about half of these patients refuse radical surgery (45%), thus undergoing only palliative care.

Anastomosis configuration and technique following ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease: a multicentre study

A limited ileocaecal resection is the most frequently performed procedure for ileocaecal CD and different anastomotic configurations and techniques have been described. This manuscript audited the different anastomotic techniques used in a national study and evaluated their influence on postoperative outcomes following ileocaecal resection for primary CD. This is a retrospective, multicentre, observational study promoted by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR), including all adults undergoing elective ileocaecal resection for primary CD from June 2018 May 2019. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and anastomotic leak rate were the secondary outcomes. 427 patients were included. The side to side anastomosis was the chosen configuration in 380 patients (89%). The stapled anastomotic (n = 286; 67%), techniques were preferred to hand-sewn (n = 141; 33%). Postoperative morbidity was 20.3% and anastomotic leak 3.7%. Anastomotic leak was independent of the type of anastomosis performed, while was associated with an ASA grade ≥ 3, presence of perianal disease and ileocolonic localization of disease. Four predictors of LOS were identified after multivariate analysis. The laparoscopic approach was the only associated with a reduced LOS (p = 0.017), while age, ASA grade ≥ 3 or administration of preoperative TPN were associated with increased LOS. The side to side was the most commonly used anastomotic configuration for ileocolic reconstruction following primary CD resection. There was no difference in postoperative morbidity according to anastomotic technique and configuration. Anastomotic leak was associated with ASA grade ≥ 3, a penetrating phenotype of disease and ileo-colonic distribution of CD.

Ventral mesh rectopexy versus conventional suture technique: a single-institutional experience

AIMS

Anterior mesh rectopexy is a novel surgical technique for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse, a common disorder in female elderly patients. Aim of the study was to evaluate functional outcomes after ventral mesh rectopexy and conventional suture rectopexy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients have been enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: 20 patients (group A) had a conventional suture rectopexy with a standard technique and 20 patients (group B) underwent an anterior mesh rectopexy. Each patient had a clinic and defecographic diagnosis of full-thickness rectal prolapse, which was further investigated with manometry and clinical questionnaires (Wexner Constipation and Incontinence Score, Rome III criteria). Postoperative outcomes were evaluated through clinical questionnaires, a rigid rectosigmoidoscopy and a defecography, 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Preoperative Wexner constipation score was greater than 15 in all the patients (21 in group A and 22 in group B); median postoperative score was 15 in group A and 11 in group B, and the difference was significant. Median preoperative incontinence score was 11 in group A and 12 in group B; median postoperative score was 9 in group A and 6 in group B. Three patients experienced recurrence in group A and only 1 patient in group B.

CONCLUSION

Ventral mesh rectopexy is feasible, safe and effective for the treatment of full-thickness rectal prolapse in a well-fit geriatric population. Better functional results have been achieved compared with conventional suture technique with a trend toward a lower recurrence rate.

Global variation in anastomosis and end colostomy formation following left-sided colorectal resection

BACKGROUND

End colostomy rates following colorectal resection vary across institutions in high-income settings, being influenced by patient, disease, surgeon and system factors. This study aimed to assess global variation in end colostomy rates after left-sided colorectal resection.

METHODS

This study comprised an analysis of GlobalSurg-1 and -2 international, prospective, observational cohort studies (2014, 2016), including consecutive adult patients undergoing elective or emergency left-sided colorectal resection within discrete 2-week windows. Countries were grouped into high-, middle- and low-income tertiles according to the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI). Factors associated with colostomy formation versus primary anastomosis were explored using a multilevel, multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

In total, 1635 patients from 242 hospitals in 57 countries undergoing left-sided colorectal resection were included: 113 (6·9 per cent) from low-HDI, 254 (15·5 per cent) from middle-HDI and 1268 (77·6 per cent) from high-HDI countries. There was a higher proportion of patients with perforated disease (57·5, 40·9 and 35·4 per cent; P < 0·001) and subsequent use of end colostomy (52·2, 24·8 and 18·9 per cent; P < 0·001) in low- compared with middle- and high-HDI settings. The association with colostomy use in low-HDI settings persisted (odds ratio (OR) 3·20, 95 per cent c.i. 1·35 to 7·57; P = 0·008) after risk adjustment for malignant disease (OR 2·34, 1·65 to 3·32; P < 0·001), emergency surgery (OR 4·08, 2·73 to 6·10; P < 0·001), time to operation at least 48 h (OR 1·99, 1·28 to 3·09; P = 0·002) and disease perforation (OR 4·00, 2·81 to 5·69; P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

Global differences existed in the proportion of patients receiving end stomas after left-sided colorectal resection based on income, which went beyond case mix alone.

coMpliAnce with evideNce-based cliniCal guidelines in the managemenT of acute biliaRy pancreAtitis): The MANCTRA-1 international audit

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Reports about the implementation of recommendations from acute pancreatitis guidelines are scant. This study aimed to evaluate, on a patient-data basis, the contemporary practice patterns of management of biliary acute pancreatitis and to compare these practices with the recommendations by the most updated guidelines.

METHODS

All consecutive patients admitted to any of the 150 participating general surgery (GS), hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (HPB), internal medicine (IM) and gastroenterology (GA) departments with a diagnosis of biliary acute pancreatitis between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2020 were included in the study. Categorical data were reported as percentages representing the proportion of all study patients or different and well-defined cohorts for each variable. Continuous data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Differences between the compliance obtained in the four different subgroups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U, Student's t, ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous data, and the Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test for categorical data.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 5275 patients. The most commonly discordant gaps between daily clinical practice and recommendations included the optimal timing for the index CT scan (6.1%, χ2 6.71, P = 0.081), use of prophylactic antibiotics (44.2%, χ2 221.05, P < 0.00001), early enteral feeding (33.2%, χ2 11.51, P = 0.009), and the implementation of early cholecystectomy strategies (29%, χ2 354.64, P < 0.00001), with wide variability based on the admitting speciality.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed an overall poor compliance with evidence-based guidelines in the management of ABP, with wide variability based on the admitting speciality. Study protocol registered in ClinicalTrials.Gov (ID Number NCT04747990).

SARS-CoV-2 causes secretory diarrhea with an enterotoxin-like mechanism, which is reduced by diosmectite

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2-associated diarrhea is unknown. Using an experimental model validated for rotavirus-induced diarrhea, we investigated the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on transepithelial ion fluxes and epithelial integrity of human intestinal cells. The effect of the antidiarrheal agent diosmectite on secretion was also evaluated following its inclusion in COVID-19 management protocols.

METHODS

We evaluated electrical parameters (intensity of short-circuit current [Isc] and transepithelial electrical resistance [TEER]) in polarized Caco-2 cells and in colonic specimens mounted in Ussing chambers after exposure to heat-inactivated (hi) SARS-CoV-2 and spike protein. Spectrofluorometry was used to measure reactive oxygen species (ROS), a marker of oxidative stress. Experiments were repeated after pretreatment with diosmectite, an antidiarrheal drug used in COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS

hiSARS-CoV-2 induced an increase in Isc when added to the mucosal (but not serosal) side of Caco-2 cells. The effect was inhibited in the absence of chloride and calcium and by the mucosal addition of the Ca2+-activated Cl- channel inhibitor A01, suggesting calcium-dependent chloride secretion. Spike protein had a lower, but similar, effect on Isc. The findings were consistent when repeated in human colonic mucosa specimens. Neither hiSARS-CoV-2 nor spike protein affected TEER, indicating epithelial integrity; both increased ROS production. Pretreatment with diosmectite inhibited the secretory effect and significantly reduced ROS of both hiSARS-CoV-2 and spike protein.

CONCLUSIONS

SARS-CoV-2 induces calcium-dependent chloride secretion and oxidative stress without damaging intestinal epithelial structure. The effects are largely induced by the spike protein and are significantly reduced by diosmectite. SARS-CoV-2 should be added to the list of human enteric pathogens.

Prevention of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure with different reinforcing mesh types: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate safety and efficacy of a mesh reinforcement following stoma reversal to prevent stoma site incisional hernia (SSIH) and differences across the prostheses used.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify comparative studies until September 2020. A meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes and a network meta-analysis for a multiple comparison of the prostheses with each other were performed.

Results

Seven studies were included in the analysis (78.4% ileostomy and 21.6% colostomy) with a total of 1716 patients with (n = 684) or without (n = 1032) mesh. Mesh placement was associated with lower risk of SSIH (7.8%vs18.1%, OR0.266,95% CI 0.123–0.577, p < 0.001) than no mesh procedures but also with a longer operative time (SMD 0.941, 95% CI 0.462–1.421, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of Surgical Site infection (11.5% vs 11.1%, OR 1.074, 95% CI 0.78–1.48, p = 0.66), seroma formation (4.4% vs 7.1%, OR 1.052, 95% CI 0.64–1.73, p = 0.84), anastomotic leakage (3.7% vs 2.7%, OR 1.598, 95% CI 0.846–3.019, p = 0.149) and length of stay (SMD − 0.579,95% CI − 1.261 to 0.102, p = 0.096) between mesh and no mesh groups. Use of prosthesis was associated with a significant lower need for a reoperation than no mesh group (8.1% vs 12.1%, OR 0.332, 95% CI 0.119–0.930, p = 0.036). Incidence of seroma is lower with biologic than polypropylene meshes but they showed a trend towards poor results compared with polypropylene or biosynthetic meshes.

Conclusion

Despite longer operative time, mesh prophylactic reinforcement at the site of stoma seems a safe and effective procedure with lower incidence of SSIH, need for reoperation and comparable short-term outcomes than standard closure technique. A significant superiority of a specific mesh type was not identified.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-021-02393-w.

National variations in perioperative assessment and surgical management of Crohn's disease: a multicentre study

AIM

Crohn's disease (CD) requires a multidisciplinary approach and surgery should be undertaken by dedicated colorectal surgeons with audited outcomes. We present a national, multicentre study, with the aim to collect benchmark data on key performance indicators in CD surgery, to highlight areas where standards of CD surgery excel and to facilitate targeted quality improvement where indicated.

METHODS

All patients undergoing ileocaecal or redo ileocolic resection in the participating centres for primary and recurrent CD from June 2018 to May 2019 were included. The main objective was to collect national data on hospital volume and practice variations. Postoperative morbidity was the primary outcome. Laparoscopic surgery and stoma rate were the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 715 patients were included: 457 primary CD and 258 recurrent CD with a postoperative morbidity of 21.6% and 34.7%, respectively. Laparoscopy was used in 83.8% of primary CD compared to 31% of recurrent CD. Twenty-five hospitals participated and the total number of patients per hospital ranged from 2 to 169. Hospitals performing more than 10 primary CD procedures per year showed a higher adoption of laparoscopy and bowel sparing surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant heterogeneity in the number of CD surgeries performed per year nationally in Italy. Our data suggest that high-volume hospitals perform more complex procedures, with a higher adoption of bowel sparing surgery. The rate of laparoscopy in high-volume hospitals is higher for primary CD but not for recurrent CD compared with low-volume hospitals.

Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in children: an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). However, there is a lack of data available about SSI in children worldwide, especially from low-income and middle-income countries. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of SSI in children and associations between SSI and morbidity across human development settings.

METHODS

A multicentre, international, prospective, validated cohort study of children aged under 16 years undergoing clean-contaminated, contaminated or dirty gastrointestinal surgery. Any hospital in the world providing paediatric surgery was eligible to contribute data between January and July 2016. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI by 30 days. Relationships between explanatory variables and SSI were examined using multilevel logistic regression. Countries were stratified into high development, middle development and low development groups using the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI).

RESULTS

Of 1159 children across 181 hospitals in 51 countries, 523 (45·1%) children were from high HDI, 397 (34·2%) from middle HDI and 239 (20·6%) from low HDI countries. The 30-day SSI rate was 6.3% (33/523) in high HDI, 12·8% (51/397) in middle HDI and 24·7% (59/239) in low HDI countries. SSI was associated with higher incidence of 30-day mortality, intervention, organ-space infection and other HAIs, with the highest rates seen in low HDI countries. Median length of stay in patients who had an SSI was longer (7.0 days), compared with 3.0 days in patients who did not have an SSI. Use of laparoscopy was associated with significantly lower SSI rates, even after accounting for HDI.

CONCLUSION

The odds of SSI in children is nearly four times greater in low HDI compared with high HDI countries. Policies to reduce SSI should be prioritised as part of the wider global agenda.