Challenges in designing a randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial for treatment of acne: The SD-ACNE trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Excessive use of antibiotics has led to development of antibiotic resistance and other antibiotic-associated complications. Dermatologists prescribe more antibiotics per clinician than any other major specialty, with much of this use for acne. Alternative acne treatments are available but are used much less often than antibiotics, at least partially because dermatologists feel that they are less effective. Spironolactone, a hormonal therapy with antiandrogen effects that can address the hormonal pathogenesis of acne, may represent a therapeutic alternative to oral antibiotics for women with acne. However, the comparative effects of spironolactone and oral antibiotics in the treatment of acne have not been definitively studied. The Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation (SD-ACNE) trial aims to answer whether spironolactone, in addition to standard topical therapy, is noninferior to doxycycline (an oral antibiotic) for women with acne. Several interesting challenges arose in the development of this study, including determining acceptability of the comparative regimens to participating dermatologists, identifying data to support a noninferiority margin, and establishing a process for unblinding participants after they completed the study while maintaining the blind for study investigators.

METHODS

We present the scientific and clinical rationale for the decisions made in the design of the trial, including input from key stakeholders through a Delphi consensus process.

RESULTS

The Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation trial (NCT04582383) is being conducted at a range of community and academic sites in the United States. To maximize external validity and inform clinical practice, the study is designed with broad eligibility criteria and no prohibition of use of topical medications. Participants in the trial will be randomized to receive either spironolactone 100 mg/day or doxycycline hyclate 100 mg/day for 16 weeks. The primary outcome is the absolute decrease in inflammatory lesion count, and we have established a noninferiority margin of four inflammatory lesions. Secondary outcomes include the percentage of participants achieving Investigator Global Assessment success, change in quality of life, and microbiome changes and diversity.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation trial will have substantial implications for the treatment of acne and antibiotic stewardship. In addition, this study will provide important information on the effect of these systemic agents on the development of changes to the microbiome and antibiotic resistance in a healthy population of patients.

Long-term Outcomes with Spinal versus General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

The effects of spinal versus general anesthesia on long-term outcomes have not been well studied. This study tested the hypothesis that spinal anesthesia is associated with better long-term survival and functional recovery than general anesthesia.

METHODS

A prespecified analysis was conducted of long-term outcomes of a completed randomized superiority trial that compared spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for hip fracture repair. Participants included previously ambulatory patients 50 yr of age or older at 46 U.S. and Canadian hospitals. Patients were randomized 1:1 to spinal or general anesthesia, stratified by sex, fracture type, and study site. Outcome assessors and investigators involved in the data analysis were masked to the treatment arm. Outcomes included survival at up to 365 days after randomization (primary); recovery of ambulation among 365-day survivors; and composite endpoints for death or new inability to ambulate and death or new nursing home residence at 365 days. Patients were included in the analysis as randomized.

RESULTS

A total of 1,600 patients were enrolled between February 12, 2016, and February 18, 2021; 795 were assigned to spinal anesthesia, and 805 were assigned to general anesthesia. Among 1,599 patients who underwent surgery, vital status information at or beyond the final study interview (conducted at approximately 365 days after randomization) was available for 1,427 (89.2%). Survival did not differ by treatment arm; at 365 days after randomization, there were 98 deaths in patients assigned to spinal anesthesia versus 92 deaths in patients assigned to general anesthesia (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.44, P = 0.59). Recovery of ambulation among patients who survived a year did not differ by type of anesthesia (adjusted odds ratio for spinal vs. general, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.14; P = 0.31). Other outcomes did not differ by treatment arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes were similar with spinal versus general anesthesia.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Evaluation of organized atrial arrhythmias after cryptogenic stroke

Background

Long-term rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) following a cryptogenic stroke (CS) is well established. However, the burden of organized atrial arrhythmias in this population is not well defined.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and risk factors for organized atrial arrhythmias in patients with CS.

Methods

We evaluated all patients with CS who received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) between October 2014 and April 2020. All ICM transmissions categorized as AF, tachycardia, or bradycardia were reviewed. We evaluated the time to detection of organized AF and the combination of either organized atrial arrhythmia or AF.

Results

A total of 195 CS patients with ICMs were included (51% men; mean age 66 ± 12 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASC score 4.6). Over mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 11.2 months, organized atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds were detected in 45 patients (23%), of whom 62% did not have AF. Seventeen patients had both organized atrial arrhythmia and AF, and another 21 patients had AF only. Compared to those with normal left atrial size, patients with left atrial enlargement had a higher adjusted risk for development of atrial arrhythmias (mild left atrial enlargement: hazard ratio 1.99; 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.75; moderate/severe left atrial enlargement: hazard ratio 3.06; 95% confidence interval 1.58-5.92).

Conclusion

Organized atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds are detected in nearly one-fourth of CS patients. Two-thirds of these patients did not have AF. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of organized atrial arrhythmias on recurrent stroke risk.

Outcomes with spinal versus general anesthesia for patients with and without preoperative cognitive impairment: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on the risk of postoperative delirium or other outcomes for patients with or without cognitive impairment (including dementia) is unknown.

METHODS

Post hoc secondary analysis of a multicenter pragmatic trial comparing spinal versus general anesthesia for adults aged 50 years or older undergoing hip fracture surgery.

RESULTS

Among patients randomized to spinal versus general anesthesia, new or worsened delirium occurred in 100/295 (33.9%) versus 107/283 (37.8%; odds ratio [OR] 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 1.19) among persons with cognitive impairment and 70/432 (16.2%) versus 71/445 (16.0%) among persons without cognitive impairment (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.47, p = 0.46 for interaction). Delirium severity, in-hospital complications, and 60-day functional recovery did not differ by anesthesia type in patients with or without cognitive impairment.

DISCUSSION

Anesthesia type is not associated with differences in delirium and functional outcomes among persons with or without cognitive impairment.

36 WHAT DO OLDER ADULTS AND HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS LOOK FOR IN A FOOD PRODUCT?

Background

The Mediterranean diet (Medi-diet) has proven benefits for healthy ageing but isn’t the habitual diet of most middle-aged or older adults in Ireland; there can be accessibility and tolerability issues with high amounts of fresh fruit and vegetables. Providing key Medi-diet nutrients in a food product is a novel approach to this challenge. This research aims to explore what ‘younger-old’ adults and healthcare professionals (HCPs) would value in such a novel food product.

Methods

Semi-structured 1:1 interviews and Focus Groups (FGs) were conducted remotely from July 2021 to January 2022. Older adults, defined as over 55’s, were recruited through relevant social, retirement and disease-support groups. Purposive sampling recruited a gender balance and a range of ages and disease profiles. HCPs were recruited through researcher networks and professional associations. Interviews/FGs were recorded, transcribed, and subsequently examined using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Older adults (n=47; 50% male) were mostly aged 60-69 years (48.9%). Recruited HCPs (n=26) included dieticians (n=8); geriatricians (n=5); therapists (n=4); and nurses, pharmacists, catering managers (community; residential), and meal delivery service coordinators (n=2 each). Participants supported a food product for older adults requiring a nutrient-dense “boost”, or supplementary fibre or protein, but generally preferred a “food-first” approach, as opposed to a “silver bullet” product. Older adults largely associated functional foods with probiotic products “to repair the gut”, something to have “every now and then”. Product texture and portion size should consider changing dentition and appetite, and consider packaging (dexterity) and preparation ease, but should not stigmatize older adults through targeted branding. Participants felt pre-made soups or cake-type bars would be appealing, but not drinks.

Conclusion

A novel food product could supplement a balanced diet for older adults, providing high-protein content, and high-fibre for gut health, complimenting an overall lifestyle approach to health improvement and disease prevention.

Pain, Analgesic Use, and Patient Satisfaction With Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery : A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The REGAIN (Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture) trial found similar ambulation and survival at 60 days with spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Trial outcomes evaluating pain, prescription analgesic use, and patient satisfaction have not yet been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To compare pain, analgesic use, and satisfaction after hip fracture surgery with spinal versus general anesthesia.

DESIGN

Preplanned secondary analysis of a pragmatic randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02507505).

SETTING

46 U.S. and Canadian hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 50 years or older undergoing hip fracture surgery.

INTERVENTION

Spinal or general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

Pain on postoperative days 1 through 3; 60-, 180-, and 365-day pain and prescription analgesic use; and satisfaction with care.

RESULTS

A total of 1600 patients were enrolled. The average age was 78 years, and 77% were women. A total of 73.5% (1050 of 1428) of patients reported severe pain during the first 24 hours after surgery. Worst pain over the first 24 hours after surgery was greater with spinal anesthesia (rated from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]; mean difference, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68]). Pain did not differ across groups at other time points. Prescription analgesic use at 60 days occurred in 25% (141 of 563) and 18.8% (108 of 574) of patients assigned to spinal and general anesthesia, respectively (relative risk, 1.33 [CI, 1.06 to 1.65]). Satisfaction was similar across groups.

LIMITATION

Missing outcome data and multiple outcomes assessed.

CONCLUSION

Severe pain is common after hip fracture. Spinal anesthesia was associated with more pain in the first 24 hours after surgery and more prescription analgesic use at 60 days compared with general anesthesia.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

POS0243 THE EFFECT OF A MEDITERRANEAN DIET ON PHYSICAL FUNCTION AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS – THE MEDRA STUDY

Background

The immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of the Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) suggest a protective role in rheumatic conditions1. A small but increasing body of evidence from randomised controlled trials demonstrates that increased adherence to a MedDiet in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) can have a beneficial effect on disease activity, pain levels and physical function2.

Objectives

The primary aim of the MEDRA study was to determine the effects of a MedDiet compared to the current food based dietary guidelines in Ireland (Healthy Eating Guidelines/HEG) on the physical function and quality of life in patients with RA.

Methods

In this randomised controlled trial, 44 patients with RA were randomly allocated to either the MedDiet or the HEG arm of the study. The 12-week dietary intervention study was delivered online by a Registered Dietitian (RD) and included data collection at three time points: baseline, mid-intervention (6 weeks) and post-intervention (12 weeks). Participants in both dietary intervention groups attended three video consultations with the RD, at baseline, weeks 6 and 12, and two follow up reviews by telephone at weeks 3 and 9. All participants were provided resources designed to specifically explain the assigned diet and how it can be successfully adhered to. Primary outcomes were changes in physical function and quality of life measured using the validated Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RAQoL), respectively. Secondary outcomes included changes in physical activity and patient-reported pain levels.

Results

Forty patients with RA completed the study (mean age:47.5 SD10.9 years, females: 87.5%). No significant differences were found in the distribution of age, anthropometric measures, disease duration, physical activity, and quality of life between the two diet groups at baseline. However, the group assigned to the MedDiet had better mean values for quality of life compared to the HEG group; 0.9 ± 0.5 vs. 1.4 ±0.7, p<0.001, respectfully. Compared to baseline, there was a significant improvement in HAQ-DI scores in participants following both the MedDiet (0.9 ±0.5 to 0.5 ± 0.4, p<0.001) and HEG (1.4 ± 0.7 to 1.0 ± 0.6, p<0.001). Significant improvements in RAQoL scores were also seen in both the MedDiet (10.1 ±7.5 to 4.0 ± 4.7, p<0.001) and HEG (11.25 ± 7.2 to 7.9 ± 6.4, p=0.02) groups. At 12 weeks, participants in the MedDiet group reported a significantly better physical function status (mean difference -0.5, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.1, p=0.007) and quality of life (mean difference -3.9, 95% CI -7.5 to -0.2, p=0.04) compared to the HEG group. Participants in the MedDiet group demonstrated a significant increase in physical activity levels (56.7 ± 28.6 to 70.6 ± 33.5, p=0.01). Conversely, a non-significant decrease in physical activity levels was observed in the HEG group from baseline to post-intervention.

Conclusion

The study indicates positive effects of a Mediterranean and low-fat diet as per the Healthy Eating Guidelines on physical function and quality of life in patients with RA. The MedDiet may be superior in improving physical activity levels. Further studies and a larger cohort are needed to confirm these findings.

References

[1]Oliviero, F., Spinella, P., Fiocco, U., Ramonda, R., Sfriso, P. and Punzi, L., 2015. How the Mediterranean diet and some of its components modulate inflammatory pathways in arthritis. Swiss medical weekly, 145(4546).

[2]Forsyth, C., Kouvari, M., D’Cunha, N.M., Georgousopoulou, E.N., Panagiotakos, D.B., Mellor, D.D., Kellett, J. and Naumovski, N., 2018. The effects of the Mediterranean diet on rheumatoid arthritis prevention and treatment: a systematic review of human prospective studies. Rheumatology international, 38(5), pp.737-747.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the School of Allied Health Postgraduate scholarship at the University of Limerick.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Comparison of Exogenous Ketone Administration Versus Dietary Carbohydrate Restriction on Myocardial Glucose Suppression: A Crossover Clinical Trial

The ketogenic diet (KD) is the standard of care to achieve myocardial glucose suppression (MGS) for assessing inflammation using ¹⁸F-FDG PET. However, failure to suppress physiologic glucose uptake remains a significant diagnostic barrier. Although extending the duration of KD may be effective, exogenously delivered ketones may provide a convenient, reliable, and same-day alternative. The aims of our study were to determine whether exogenous ketone administration is noninferior to the KD to achieve MGS and whether serum β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) levels can predict MGS. Methods: KEETO-CROSS (Ketogenic Endogenous versus Exogenous Therapies for myoCaRdial glucOse SuppresSion) is a crossover, noninferiority trial of the KD (endogenous ketosis) versus ketone ester ([KE] exogenous ketosis) drink. Twenty healthy participants were enrolled into 3 arms: weight-based KE drink, 24-h KD, and 72-h KD (n = 18 completed all arms). The primary outcome was achievement of complete MGS on PET (noninferiority margin 5%). The area under receiver-operating-characteristics (AUROC) of endogenous BHB levels (analyzed in a laboratory and by point-of-care device) for predicting MGS was analyzed in 37 scans completed on the KD. Results: The mean age was 30 ± 7 y, 50% were women, and 45% were nonwhite. The median achieved BHB levels (mmol/L) were 3.82 (25th-75th percentile, 2.55-4.97) (KE drink), 0.77 (25th-75th percentile, 0.58-1.02) (25th-75th percentile, 24-h KD), and 1.30 (25th-75th percentile, 0.80-2.24) (72-h KD). The primary outcome was achieved in 44% (KE drink), 78% (24-h KD), and 83% (72-h KD) of participants (noninferiority P = 0.97 and 0.98 for KE vs. 24-h and 72-h KD). Endogenous BHB levels robustly predicted MGS (AUROC, 0.88; 95% CI 0.71, 1.00). A BHB of 0.58 or more correctly classified 92% of scans. A point-of-care device provided comparable predictive value. Conclusion: In healthy volunteers, KE was inferior to KD for achieving MGS. Serum BHB is a highly predictive biomarker for MGS and can be clinically implemented upstream of ¹⁸F-FDG PET, with rapid facilitation by point-of-care testing, to reduce false-positive scans.

Acute Echocardiographic Effects of Exogenous Ketone Administration in Healthy Participants

BACKGROUND

Interest in therapeutic applications of exogenous ketones has grown significantly, spanning patients with heart failure to endurance athletes. Exogenous ketones engender significant effects on cardiac function in heart failure and provide an ergogenic benefit in athletes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of exogenous ketones on cardiac function in healthy participants.

METHODS

In a single-arm intervention study, 20 fasting, healthy participants underwent comprehensive echocardiography (two-dimensional, Doppler, and strain) before and 30 min after weight-based oral ketone ester administration. The relationship between changes in log-transformed biomarker levels and change in absolute global longitudinal strain (GLS) was assessed using linear regression.

RESULTS

The mean age was 30 ± 7 years, 50% were women, 45% were nonwhite, and the average body mass index was 24.3 ± 3.1 kg/m². Ketone ingestion acutely elevated β-hydroxybutyrate levels from a median of 0.13 mmol/L (interquartile range, 0.10-0.37 mmol/L) to 3.23 mmol/L (interquartile range, 2.40-4.97 mmol/L) (P < .001). After ketone ester consumption, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, biventricular function, left ventricular GLS, and left atrial (LA) strain all augmented, while systemic vascular resistance decreased. Displayed as mean change, increases in ejection fraction (3.1%; 95% CI, 2.0%-4.2%; P < .001), GLS (2.0%; 95% CI, 1.4%-2.7%; P < .001), right ventricular S' (1.1 cm/sec; 95% CI, 0.4-1.8 cm/sec; P = .004), LA reservoir strain (7%; 95% CI, 3%-12%; P = .005), and LA contractile strain (4%; 2%-6%; P = .001) were observed. During robustly achieved ketosis, change in GLS was inversely associated with change in nonesterified fatty acids (P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

In a single-arm study, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, biventricular function, and LV and LA strain acutely augmented after ketone ester ingestion in healthy, fasting participants, similar to several effects observed in the failing heart. These data may provide supporting data for the ergogenic benefits observed in athletes and may become increasingly relevant with exogenous ketone consumption across a variety of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular applications.

Spinal Anesthesia or General Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

The effects of spinal anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia on the ability to walk in older adults undergoing surgery for hip fracture have not been well studied.

METHODS

We conducted a pragmatic, randomized superiority trial to evaluate spinal anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia in previously ambulatory patients 50 years of age or older who were undergoing surgery for hip fracture at 46 U.S. and Canadian hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive spinal or general anesthesia. The primary outcome was a composite of death or an inability to walk approximately 10 ft (3 m) independently or with a walker or cane at 60 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included death within 60 days, delirium, time to discharge, and ambulation at 60 days.

RESULTS

A total of 1600 patients were enrolled; 795 were assigned to receive spinal anesthesia and 805 to receive general anesthesia. The mean age was 78 years, and 67.0% of the patients were women. A total of 666 patients (83.8%) assigned to spinal anesthesia and 769 patients (95.5%) assigned to general anesthesia received their assigned anesthesia. Among patients in the modified intention-to-treat population for whom data were available, the composite primary outcome occurred in 132 of 712 patients (18.5%) in the spinal anesthesia group and 132 of 733 (18.0%) in the general anesthesia group (relative risk, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.27; P = 0.83). An inability to walk independently at 60 days was reported in 104 of 684 patients (15.2%) and 101 of 702 patients (14.4%), respectively (relative risk, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.36), and death within 60 days occurred in 30 of 768 (3.9%) and 32 of 784 (4.1%), respectively (relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.57). Delirium occurred in 130 of 633 patients (20.5%) in the spinal anesthesia group and in 124 of 629 (19.7%) in the general anesthesia group (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal anesthesia for hip-fracture surgery in older adults was not superior to general anesthesia with respect to survival and recovery of ambulation at 60 days. The incidence of postoperative delirium was similar with the two types of anesthesia. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; REGAIN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02507505.).

Implementation of a virtual international cardiology curriculum to address the deficit of cardiovascular education in Haiti: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, conferring a disparate burden on low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Haiti represents a resource-constrained setting, limited by a paucity of resources and trained cardiovascular professionals equipped to address the increasing burden of CVD.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we describe the creation of a comprehensive cardiology curriculum delivered through a virtual classroom. The curriculum was created to augment cardiovascular education in LMICs such as Haiti.

METHODS

Over one academic year (May 2019-2020), International Cardiology Curriculum Accessible by Remote Distance Learning-Haiti consisted of biweekly, live-streamed, synchronous didactic lectures, seminars and case presentations broadcasted to 16 internal medicine (IM) residents at Hôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais, one of only four IM training programmes in Haiti. The virtual classroom was created using commercially available videoconferencing and data-sharing platforms. Prelecture and postlecture surveys and an end of the year survey were administered to assess the impact of the curriculum.

RESULTS

Participant performance analysis revealed that 80% of the curriculum demonstrated a positive trend in knowledge acquisition postintervention. Based on the end of the year evaluation, 94% of participants reported that the curriculum was educational and relevant to medical practice in Haiti and 100% reported that the curriculum was good to excellent. Additionally, the curriculum was cited as an effective means of maintaining trainee education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

This international medical education pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of augmenting cardiology education in LMICs by creating a virtual curriculum made possible by local partnerships, internet access and technology.

Bleeding risk by intensity of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Studies report hypercoagulability in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading many institutions to escalate anticoagulation intensity for thrombosis prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the bleeding risk with various intensities of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID-19 compared with other respiratory viral illnesses (ORVI).

PATIENTS/METHODS

This retrospective cohort study compared the incidence of major bleeding in patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) within a single health system with COVID-19 versus ORVI. In the COVID-19 cohort, we assessed the effect of anticoagulation intensity received on ICU admission on bleeding risk. We performed a secondary analysis with anticoagulation intensity as a time-varying covariate to reflect dose changes after ICU admission.

RESULTS

Four hundred and forty-three and 387 patients were included in the COVID-19 and ORVI cohorts, respectively. The hazard ratio of major bleeding for the COVID-19 cohort relative to the ORVI cohort was 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-1.86). In COVID-19 patients, an inverse-probability treatment weighted model found therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation on ICU admission had an adjusted hazard ratio of bleeding of 1.55 (95% CI: 0.88-2.73) compared with standard prophylactic-intensity anticoagulation. However, when anticoagulation was assessed as a time-varying covariate and adjusted for other risk factors for bleeding, the adjusted hazard ratio for bleeding on therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation compared with standard thromboprophylaxis was 2.59 (95% CI: 1.20-5.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Critically ill patients with COVID-19 had a similar bleeding risk as ORVI patients. When accounting for changes in anticoagulation that occurred in COVID-19 patients, therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation was associated with a greater risk of major bleeding compared with standard thromboprophylaxis.

OP0191-PARE DEVELOPMENT OF A PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT (PPI) RESEARCH NETWORK FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE RHEUMATIC CONDITIONS

Background:

Public and patient involvement (PPI) improves quality and relevance of research (1). PPI is advocated by policy makers and funding bodies and is supported by EULAR (2). Arthritis Research Limerick (ARL) is a partnership between researchers at the University of Limerick and clinicians at University Hospitals Limerick. PPI representatives have been involved in ARL projects, however no formal PPI network had been established prior to 2020. The need for a formal PPI network to collaborate with ARL was identified by both ARL and patient representatives. This need arose from a joint ambition to promote meaningful involvement of the public and patients in ARL projects and to develop a platform through which researchers and PPI representatives could collaboratively set research priorities.

Objectives:

The aim of this project was to create a formal PPI network to engage with people living with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and their families and to identify collaborative research opportunities between ARL and PPI representatives.

Methods:

A face-to-face PPI seminar was planned for October 2020. The seminar consisted of speakers from ARL providing an overview of research projects and a World Café research ideas session. Funding was obtained through a competitive, peer-review funding call from the PPI Ignite group at the University of Limerick to support the PPI seminar. The funding application was a joint application between ARL members and a PPI partner (iCAN - Irish Children’s Arthritis Network). The seminar was advertised through national patient organisations (iCAN and Arthritis Ireland), social media and ARL research networks.

Results:

Due to Covid-19 public health restrictions the PPI seminar was held virtually. The ARL PPI inaugural seminar was attended by N=19 researchers and people living with RMDs. The seminar speakers included ARL researchers and a PPI representative. The World Café event was modified to adapt to the virtual seminar delivery. Research ideas were noted by the seminar organiser and summarised for attendees at the end of the research ideas and priorities session. An ARL PPI mailing list was set-up post seminar as a means of communicating with seminar attendees and will serve as a formal PPI network for ARL. Research updates and opportunities will be communicated via this formal network to people living with RMDs and researchers alike.

Conclusion:

This was the first PPI seminar organised by ARL in collaboration with a PPI seminar, and has led to the creation of a formal PPI network. Delivery mode of the PPI seminar was changed due to Covid-19 public health restrictions. This change may also have impacted engagement and attendance at the PPI seminar, given that virtual events are not accessible to all of the RMD population. Future PPI seminars will consider a hybrid approach of face-to-face and virtual attendance, to enhance accessibility. A formal PPI communication network has been established. Future work will focus future collaborative opportunities between the PPI panel and the ARL group, including project development, co-led research funding applications and joint research dissemination.

References:

[1]INVOLVE. (2012). Briefing notes for researchers: Involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. Retrieved from www.invo.org.uk 7th January 2020.

[2]de Wit MPT, Berlo SE, Aanerud GJ, et al (2011). European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 70:722-726

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Short-term and long-term effects of rapid maxillary expansion on the nasal soft and hard tissue

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate nasal soft and hard tissue changes immediately post-rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and to assess the stability of these changes using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 35 treatment group (TG) patients (18 girls, 17 boys; 9.39 ± 1.4) had a pre-RME CBCT and a post-RME CBCT approximately 66 days after expansion, and 25 patients had a follow-up CBCT 2.84 years later. A total of 28 control group (CG; no RME) patients (16 girls, 12 boys; 8.81 ± 1.6) had an initial CBCT and a CBCT an average of 2.25 years later. Soft and hard tissue nasal landmarks were measured in transverse, sagittal, and coronal planes of space on CBCT scans. Differences within the same group were evaluated by paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Long-term comparisons between TG and CG were evaluated by independent-sample t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

RESULTS

Immediately post-RME, there were statistically significant mean increases of 1.6 mm of alar base width, 1.77 mm of pyriform height, and 3.57 mm of pyriform width (P < .05). CG showed the significant increases over 2.25 years (P < .001). Compared with CG, the long-term evaluation of TG demonstrated only pyriform height and pyriform width showed a statistically significant difference (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although RME produced some significant increase on the nasal soft tissue immediately after expansion, it regressed to the mean of normal growth and development over time. However, long-term evaluation of TG compared with CG showed only pyriform height and pyriform width to be affected by RME.

COVID-19 and cardiac arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Early studies suggest that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a high incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection may cause injury to cardiac myocytes and increase arrhythmia risk.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of cardiac arrest and arrhythmias including incident atrial fibrillation (AF), bradyarrhythmias, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in a large urban population hospitalized for COVID-19. We also evaluated correlations between the presence of these arrhythmias and mortality.

METHODS

We reviewed the characteristics of all patients with COVID-19 admitted to our center over a 9-week period. Throughout hospitalization, we evaluated the incidence of cardiac arrests, arrhythmias, and inpatient mortality. We also used logistic regression to evaluate age, sex, race, body mass index, prevalent cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and intensive care unit (ICU) status as potential risk factors for each arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Among 700 patients (mean age 50 ± 18 years; 45% men; 71% African American; 11% received ICU care), there were 9 cardiac arrests, 25 incident AF events, 9 clinically significant bradyarrhythmias, and 10 NSVTs. All cardiac arrests occurred in patients admitted to the ICU. In addition, admission to the ICU was associated with incident AF (odds ratio [OR] 4.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-13.18) and NSVT (OR 8.92; 95% CI 1.73-46.06) after multivariable adjustment. Also, age and incident AF (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and prevalent heart failure and bradyarrhythmias (OR 9.75; 95% CI 1.95-48.65) were independently associated. Only cardiac arrests were associated with acute in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac arrests and arrhythmias are likely the consequence of systemic illness and not solely the direct effects of COVID-19 infection.

Changes in School Competitive Food Environments after a Health Promotion Campaign

BACKGROUND

Schools can reduce student access to competitive foods and influence healthy food choices by improving the school nutrition environment. This study describes changes in competitive nutrition environments in 100 K-8 schools participating in the Philadelphia Campaign for Healthier Schools.

METHODS

Interviews with school staff were used to elicit information about policies, practices, and guidelines to restrict/limit competitive foods in schools, before and 1 year into the campaign. To increase the validity of responses, respondents provided documentation for reported policies and guidelines. Baseline interviews were conducted between April and June 2011 and follow-up interviews were conducted between April and June 2012.

RESULTS

At follow-up, significantly more schools reported having policies and/or guidelines in place to regulate food as a reward in the classroom, food served at parties and celebrations, outside foods allowed in school, and the availability of sodas and sugar-sweetened beverages. There were no measurable effects on food available in school stores, fundraisers, or afterschool programs. Availability of concrete documentation of policies was limited, but when provided, it corroborated the interview responses.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of a comprehensive school wellness policy, school wellness councils were associated with increases in school-level policies and practices that improved the competitive nutrition environment.