1
|
Trilling B, Tidadini F, Lakkis Z, Jafari M, Germain A, Rullier E, Lefevre J, Tuech JJ, Kartheuser A, Leonard D, Prudhomme M, Piessen G, Regimbeau JM, Cotte E, Duprez D, Badic B, Panis Y, Rivoire M, Meunier B, Portier G, Bosson JL, Vilotitch A, Foote A, Caspar Y, Rouanet P, Faucheron JL. Suprapubic versus transurethral catheterization for bladder drainage in male rectal cancer surgery (GRECCAR10), a randomized clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:77. [PMID: 38954131 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02950-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder drainage is systematically used in rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal type of drainage, transurethral catheterization (TUC) or suprapubic catheterization (SPC), is still controversial. The aim was to compare the rates of urinary tract infection on the fourth postoperative day (POD4) between TUC and SPC, after rectal cancer surgery regardless of the day of removal of the urinary drain. METHODS This randomized clinical trial in 19 expert colorectal surgery centers in France and Belgium was performed between October 2016 and October 2019 and included 240 men (with normal or subnormal voiding function) undergoing mesorectal excision with low anastomosis for rectal cancer. Patients were followed at postoperative days 4, 30, and 180. RESULTS In 208 patients (median age 66 years [IQR 58-71]) randomized to TUC (n = 99) or SPC (n = 109), the rate of urinary infection at POD4 was not significantly different whatever the type of drainage (11/99 (11.1%) vs. 8/109 (7.3%), 95% CI, - 4.2% to 11.7%; p = 0.35). There was significantly more pyuria in the TUC group (79/99 (79.0%) vs. (60/109 (60.9%), 95% CI, 5.7-30.0%; p = 0.004). No difference in bacteriuria was observed between the groups. Patients in the TUC group had a shorter duration of catheterization (median 4 [2-5] vs. 4 [3-5] days; p = 0.002). Drainage complications were more frequent in the SPC group at all followup visits. CONCLUSIONS TUC should be preferred over SPC in male patients undergoing surgery for mid and/or lower rectal cancers, owing to the lower rate of complications and shorter duration of catheterization. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02922647.
Collapse
|
2
|
Van den Dop LM, Van Rooijen MMJ, Tollens T, Jørgensen LN, De Vries-Reilingh TS, Piessen G, Köckerling F, Miserez M, Dean M, Berrevoet F, Dousset B, Van Westreenen HL, Gossetti F, Tetteroo GWM, Koch A, Boomsma MF, Lange JF, Jeekel J. Five-Year Follow-Up of a Slowly Resorbable Biosynthetic P4HB Mesh (Phasix) in VHWG Grade 3 Incisional Hernia Repair. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2023; 4:e366. [PMID: 38144487 PMCID: PMC10735126 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the 5-year recurrence rate of incisional hernia repair in Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) 3 hernia with a slowly resorbable mesh. Summary Background Data Incisional hernia recurs frequently after initial repair. In potentially contaminated hernia, recurrences rise to 40%. Recently, the biosynthetic Phasix mesh has been developed that is resorbed in 12-18 months. Resorbable meshes might be a solution for incisional hernia repair to decrease short- and long-term (mesh) complications. However, long-term outcomes after resorption are scarce. Methods Patients with VHWG grade 3 incisional midline hernia, who participated in the Phasix trial (Clinilcaltrials.gov: NCT02720042) were included by means of physical examination and computed tomography (CT). Primary outcome was hernia recurrence; secondary outcomes comprised of long-term mesh complications, reoperations, and abdominal wall pain [visual analogue score (VAS): 0-10]. Results In total, 61/84 (72.6%) patients were seen. Median follow-up time was 60.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 55-64] months. CT scan was made in 39 patients (68.4%). A recurrence rate of 15.9% (95% confidence interval: 6.9-24.8) was calculated after 5 years. Four new recurrences (6.6%) were found between 2 and 5 years. Two were asymptomatic. In total, 13/84 recurrences were found. No long-term mesh complications and/or interventions occurred. VAS scores were 0 (IQR: 0-2). Conclusions Hernia repair with Phasix mesh in high-risk patients (VHWG 3, body mass index >28) demonstrated a recurrence rate of 15.9%, low pain scores, no mesh-related complications or reoperations for chronic pain between the 2- and 5-year follow-up. Four new recurrences occurred, 2 were asymptomatic. The poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh is a safe mesh for hernia repair in VHWG 3 patients, which avoids long-term mesh complications like pain and mesh infection.
Collapse
|
3
|
Söderström H, Moons J, Nafteux P, Uzun E, Grimminger P, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Degisors S, Piessen G, Vanommeslaeghe H, Van Daele E, Cheong E, Gutschow CA, Vetter D, Schuring N, Gisbertz SS, Räsänen J. ASO Visual Abstract: Major Intraoperative Complications During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8294-8295. [PMID: 37821789 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14386-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
|
4
|
Söderström H, Moons J, Nafteux P, Uzun E, Grimminger P, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Degisors S, Piessen G, Vanommeslaeghe H, Van Daele E, Cheong E, Gutschow CA, Vetter D, Schuring N, Gisbertz SS, Räsänen J. Major Intraoperative Complications During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8244-8250. [PMID: 37782412 PMCID: PMC10625950 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14340-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to be a feasible surgical technique in treating esophageal carcinoma. Postoperative complications have been extensively reviewed, but literature focusing on intraoperative complications is limited. The main objective of this study was to report major intraoperative complications and 90-day mortality during MIE for cancer. METHODS Data were collected retrospectively from 10 European esophageal surgery centers. All intention-to-treat, minimally invasive laparoscopic/thoracoscopic esophagectomies with gastric conduit reconstruction for esophageal and GE junction cancers operated on between 2003 and 2019 were reviewed. Major intraoperative complications were defined as loss of conduit, erroneous transection of vascular structures, significant injury to other organs including bowel, heart, liver or lung, splenectomy, or other major complications including intubation injuries, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction. RESULTS Amongst 2862 MIE cases we identified 98 patients with 101 intraoperative complications. Vascular injuries were the most prevalent, 41 during laparoscopy and 19 during thoracoscopy, with injuries to 18 different vessels. There were 24 splenic vascular or capsular injuries, 11 requiring splenectomies. Four losses of conduit due to gastroepiploic artery injury and six bowel injuries were reported. Eight tracheobronchial lesions needed repair, and 11 patients had significant lung parenchyma injuries. There were 2 on-table deaths. Ninety-day mortality was 9.2%. CONCLUSIONS This study offers an overview of the range of different intraoperative complications during minimally invasive esophagectomy. Mortality, especially from intrathoracic vascular injuries, appears significant.
Collapse
|
5
|
Veziant J, Benhalima S, Piessen G, Slim K. Obesity, sleeve gastrectomy and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. J Visc Surg 2023; 160:S47-S54. [PMID: 36725450 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed operation for morbid obesity in the world. In spite of its demonstrated efficacy, the Achilles' Heel of this procedure seems to be either pre-existing or de novo gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) with its potential complications such as peptic esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and, in the long-term, esophageal adenocarcinoma. According to factual literature, it appears clear that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the preferred choice in case of pre-existing GERD or hiatal hernia discovered during preoperative workup for bariatric surgery. Nonetheless, certain authors propose performance of SG with an associated antireflux procedure such as Nissen fundoplication. Strict endoscopic surveillance is recommended after bariatric surgery. Revisional surgery (conversion of SG into Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)) is the treatment of choice for patients who develop GERD after SG when conservative treatment (modified lifestyle and proton pump inhibitors) has failed. Lastly, with regard to the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma after SG, large scale studies with adequate follow-up are necessary to come to factual conclusions. In all cases, the management of this conundrum remains a major technical challenge that has to be taken in consideration in future years, especially because of the current expansion of bariatric surgery.
Collapse
|
6
|
Van Den Dop M, Tollens T, Jørgensen L, De Vries-Reilingh T, Piessen G, Köckerling F, Miserez M, Dean M, Berrevoet F, Dousset B, Van Westreenen G, Gosetti F, Lange J, Tetteroo G, Jeekel H. OC-053 LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF A SLOWLY RESORBABLE BIOSYNTHETIC MESH IN VHWG GRADE 3 HERNIA REPAIR. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac308.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Incisional hernia recurrence occurs frequently after initial repair. In potentially contaminated hernia, these numbers can rise up to 50%. Recently, resorbable meshes have been used to prevent infection in complicated incisional hernia and prevent long term mesh complications. Present study focuses on the long term outcomes of a resorbable mesh.
Methods
Patients included in the priorly conducted Phasix trial with Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grade 3 hernia were invited for an abdominal CT scan and physical examination. Primary outcome was hernia recurrence, secondary outcomes comprised of abdominal wall configuration, mesh resorption and long term mesh complications.
Results
Of the 84 patients included in the 2-year follow-up, 56 were available for long term follow-up up to five years. Mean follow-up time was 4.2 years. CT scan was made in 36 (64.3%) of patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a recurrence rate of 16.7% after five years. Four (7.1%) new recurrences were found between 2-year and 4.2 years follow-up of which three by CT scan. In 50% of CT scans, no signs of postoperative distortions of the abdominal wall were observed. No long term mesh complications were reported.
Conclusion
After long term follow-up, VHWG 3 hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh demonstrated good performance with regard to hernia recurrence. Possibly, tissue reconstruction took place in the first two years after implantation by the use it or lose it principle, which led to sufficient native abdominal wall strength to prevent recurrences after resorption of the mesh.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lordick F, Carneiro F, Cascinu S, Fleitas T, Haustermans K, Piessen G, Vogel A, Smyth EC. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1005-1020. [PMID: 35914639 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 372] [Impact Index Per Article: 186.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
|
8
|
Veziant J, Gagnière J, Gronnier C, Mariette C, Tzedakis S, Fuks D, Piessen G, Cabau M, Jougon J, Badic B, Lozach P, Cappeliez S, Lebreton G, Alves A, Flamein R, Pezet D, Pipitone F, Iuga BS, Contival N, Pappalardo E, Mantziari S, Hec F, Vanderbeken M, Tessier W, Briez N, Fredon F, Gainant A, Mathonnet M, Bigourdan JM, Mezoughi S, Ducerf C, Baulieux J, Pasquer A, Baraket O, Poncet G, Vaudoyer D, Enfer PJ, Villeneuve L, Glehen O, Coste T, Fabre JM, Marchal F, Frisoni R, Ayav A, Brunaud L, Bresler L, Cohen C, Aze O, Venissac N, Pop D, Mouroux J, Donici I, Prudhomme M, Felli E, Lisunfui S, Seman M, Petit GG, Karoui M, Tresallet C, Ménégaux F, Hannoun L, Malgras B, Lantuas D, Pautrat K, Pocard M, Valleur P. Non-occlusive Small Bowel Ischemia Related to Postoperative Feeding Jejunostomy Tube Use After Esophagectomy for Cancer: Propensity Score Analysis of the AFC-FREGAT Database. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1760-1763. [PMID: 35318593 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05223-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
9
|
Ubels S, Verstegen M, Klarenbeek B, Bouwense S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Daams F, van Det MJ, Griffiths EA, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, Koshy R, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Polat F, Siersema PD, Singh P, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, van Workum F, Rosman C, Matthée E, Slootmans CAM, Ultee G, Schouten J, Gisbertz SS, Eshuis WJ, Kalff MC, Feenstra ML, van der Peet DL, Stam WT, van Etten B, Poelmann F, Vuurberg N, van den Berg JW, Martijnse IS, Matthijsen RM, Luyer M, Curvers W, Nieuwenhuijzen T, Taselaar AE, Kouwenhoven EA, Lubbers M, Sosef M, Lecot F, Geraedts TCM, van Esser S, Dekker JWT, van den Wildenberg F, Kelder W, Lubbers M, Baas PC, de Haas JWA, Hartgrink HH, Bahadoer RR, van Sandick JW, Hartemink KJ, Veenhof X, Stockmann H, Gorgec B, Weeder P, Wiezer MJ, Genders CMS, Belt E, Blomberg B, van Duijvendijk P, Claassen L, Reetz D, Steenvoorde P, Mastboom W, Klein Ganseij HJ, van Dalsen AD, Joldersma A, Zwakman M, Groenendijk RPR, Montazeri M, Mercer S, Knight B, van Boxel G, McGregor RJ, Skipworth RJE, Frattini C, Bradley A, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Huang B, Bundred J, Evans R, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, Eren U, Saunders J, Theophilidou E, Khanzada Z, Elliott JA, Ponten J, King S, Reynolds JV, Sgromo B, Akbari K, Shalaby S, Gutschow CA, Schmidt H, Vetter D, Moorthy K, Ibrahim MAH, Christodoulidis G, Räsänen JV, Kauppi J, Söderström H, Manatakis DK, Korkolis DP, Balalis D, Rompu A, Alkhaffaf B, Alasmar M, Arebi M, Piessen G, Nuytens F, Degisors S, Ahmed A, Boddy A, Gandhi S, Fashina O, Van Daele E, Pattyn P, Robb WB, Arumugasamy M, Al Azzawi M, Whooley J, Colak E, Aybar E, Sari AC, Uyanik MS, Ciftci AB, Sayyed R, Ayub B, Murtaza G, Saeed A, Ramesh P, Charalabopoulos A, Liakakos T, Schizas D, Baili E, Kapelouzou A, Valmasoni M, Pierobon ES, Capovilla G, Merigliano S, Silviu C, Rodica B, Florin A, Cristian Gelu R, Petre H, Guevara Castro R, Salcedo AF, Negoi I, Negoita VM, Ciubotaru C, Stoica B, Hostiuc S, Colucci N, Mönig SP, Wassmer CH, Meyer J, Takeda FR, Aissar Sallum RA, Ribeiro U, Cecconello I, Toledo E, Trugeda MS, Fernández MJ, Gil C, Castanedo S, Isik A, Kurnaz E, Videira JF, Peyroteo M, Canotilho R, Weindelmayer J, Giacopuzzi S, De Pasqual CA, Bruna M, Mingol F, Vaque J, Pérez C, Phillips AW, Chmelo J, Brown J, Han LE, Gossage JA, Davies AR, Baker CR, Kelly M, Saad M, Bernardi D, Bonavina L, Asti E, Riva C, Scaramuzzo R, Elhadi M, Abdelkarem Ahmed H, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Msherghi AAA, Wills V, Campbell C, Perez Cerdeira M, Whiting S, Merrett N, Das A, Apostolou C, Lorenzo A, Sousa F, Adelino Barbosa J, Devezas V, Barbosa E, Fernandes C, Smith G, Li EY, Bhimani N, Chan P, Kotecha K, Hii MW, Ward SM, Johnson M, Read M, Chong L, Hollands MJ, Allaway M, Richardson A, Johnston E, Chen AZL, Kanhere H, Prasad S, McQuillan P, Surman T, Trochsler MI, Schofield WA, Ahmed SK, Reid JL, Harris MC, Gananadha S, Farrant J, Rodrigues N, Fergusson J, Hindmarsh A, Afzal Z, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Rooney S, Loureiro C, Leturio Fernández S, Díez del Val I, Jaunoo S, Kennedy L, Hussain A, Theodorou D, Triantafyllou T, Theodoropoulos C, Palyvou T, Elhadi M, Abdullah Ben Taher F, Ekheel M, Msherghi AAA. Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score.
Methods
This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally.
Results
Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification.
Conclusion
The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.
Collapse
|
10
|
Cabrit N, Faron M, Tierney J, Cheugoua-Zanetsie M, Thirion P, Cunningham D, Winter K, Fu J, Mauer M, Shapiro J, Burmeister B, Walsh T, Piessen G, Klevebro F, Ychou M, Van Der Gaast A, Law S, Stahl M, Paoletti X, Ducreux M, Michiels S. SO-5 Disease-free survival as surrogate for overall survival in neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy treatment of esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma: An analysis of 4518 individual patients and 22 trials. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
11
|
Piessen G, Adenis A, Renaud F, Devaux S, Singh P, Xiao H, Casabianca P, Jamain C, Emery C, Torreton E, Fagnani F. P-152 Real-world data in patients with localized esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer undergoing surgery in France: Results from the FREGAT database. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
12
|
Faron M, Cheugoua-Zanetsie M, Thirion P, Tierney J, Cunningham D, Winter K, Fu J, Mauer M, Shapiro J, Burmeister B, Walsh T, Piessen G, Klevebro F, Ychou M, Van Der Gaast A, Law S, Stahl M, van Sandick J, Pignon J, Ducreux M, Michiels S. SO-4 Individual participant data network meta-analysis (IPD-NMA) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
13
|
Gauchet A, Charton E, Pozet A, Baudry A, Gehenne L, Lelorain S, Piessen G, Grynberg D, Christophe V, Anota A. Détérioration de la Qualité de Vie globale des patients atteints d'un cancer œsogastrique à chaque étape du parcours de soin : résultats de l’étude DETAVIE. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2022.03.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
14
|
Sheng WG, Assogba E, Billa O, Piessen G, Yonli TD. La qualité de vie initiale peut-elle prédire la survenue de complications chez les patients atteints d'un cancer de l'oesophage résécable traités par chirurgie ? Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2021.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
15
|
Bonnot PE, Lintis A, Mercier F, Benzerdjeb N, Passot G, Pocard M, Meunier B, Bereder JM, Abboud K, Marchal F, Quenet F, Goere D, Msika S, Arvieux C, Pirro N, Wernert R, Rat P, Gagnière J, Lefevre JH, Courvoisier T, Kianmanesh R, Vaudoyer D, Rivoire M, Meeus P, Villeneuve L, Piessen G, Glehen O. Prognosis of poorly cohesive gastric cancer after complete cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CYTO-CHIP study). Br J Surg 2021; 108:1225-1235. [PMID: 34498666 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of gastric poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) is increasing. The prognosis for patients with peritoneal metastases remains poor and the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is controversial. The aim was to clarify the impact of gastric PCC with peritoneal metastases treated by CRS with or without HIPEC. METHODS All patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer treated with CRS with or without HIPEC, in 19 French centres, between 1989 and 2014, were identified from institutional databases. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes were compared between PCC and non-PCC subtypes, and the possible benefit of HIPEC was assessed. RESULTS In total, 277 patients were included (188 PCC, 89 non-PCC). HIPEC was performed in 180 of 277 patients (65 per cent), including 124 of 188 with PCC (66 per cent). Median overall survival (OS) was 14.7 (95 per cent c.i. 12.7 to 17.3) months in the PCC group versus 21.2 (14.7 to 36.4) months in the non-PCC group (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, PCC (hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 2.25; P = 0.044) was associated with poorer OS, as were pN3, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), and resection with a completeness of cytoreduction score of 1, whereas HIPEC was associated with improved OS (HR 0.52; P < 0.001). The benefit of CRS-HIPEC over CRS alone was consistent, irrespective of histology, with a median OS of 16.7 versus 11.3 months (HR 0.60, 0.39 to 0.92; P = 0.018) in the PCC group, and 34.5 versus 14.3 months (HR 0.43, 0.25 to 0.75; P = 0.003) in the non-PCC group. Non-PCC and HIPEC were independently associated with improved recurrence-free survival and fewer peritoneal recurrences. In patients who underwent HIPEC, PCI values of below 7 and less than 13 were predictive of OS in PCC and non-PCC populations respectively. CONCLUSION In selected patients, CRS-HIPEC offers acceptable outcomes among those with gastric PCC and long survival for patients without PCC.
Collapse
|
16
|
Müller-Stich BP, Probst P, Nienhüser H, Fazeli S, Senft J, Kalkum E, Heger P, Warschkow R, Nickel F, Billeter AT, Grimminger PP, Gutschow C, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Piessen G, Paireder M, Schoppmann SF, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA, van der Sluis P, van Hillegersberg R, Hölscher AH, Diener MK, Schmidt T. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and individual patient data comparing minimally invasive with open oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1026-1033. [PMID: 34491293 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) for oesophageal cancer may reduce surgical complications compared with open oesophagectomy. MIO is, however, technically challenging and may impair optimal oncological resection. The aim of the present study was to assess if MIO for cancer is beneficial. METHODS A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL was performed and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MIO with open oesophagectomy were included in a meta-analysis. Survival was analysed using individual patient data. Random-effects model was used for pooled estimates of perioperative effects. RESULTS Among 3219 articles, six RCTs were identified including 822 patients. Three-year overall survival (56 (95 per cent c.i. 49 to 62) per cent for MIO versus 52 (95 per cent c.i. 44 to 60) per cent for open; P = 0.54) and disease-free survival (54 (95 per cent c.i. 47 to 61) per cent versus 50 (95 per cent c.i. 42 to 58) per cent; P = 0.38) were comparable. Overall complication rate was lower for MIO (odds ratio 0.33 (95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.53); P < 0.010) mainly due to fewer pulmonary complications (OR 0.44 (95 per cent c.i. 0.27 to 0.72); P < 0.010), including pneumonia (OR 0.41 (95 per cent c.i. 0.22 to 0.77); P < 0.010). CONCLUSION MIO for cancer is associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications compared with open resection. Overall and disease-free survival are comparable for the two techniques. LAY SUMMARY Oesophagectomy for cancer is associated with a high risk of complications. A minimally invasive approach might be less traumatic, leading to fewer complications and may also improve oncological outcome. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive to open oesophagectomy was performed. The analysis showed that the minimally invasive approach led to fewer postoperative complications, in particular, fewer pulmonary complications. Survival after surgery was comparable for the two techniques.
Collapse
|
17
|
Brac B, Dufour C, Behal H, Vanderbeken M, Labreuche J, Leteurtre E, Mariette C, Eveno C, Piessen G, Renaud F. Is There an Optimal Definition for a Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8337-8346. [PMID: 34514523 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10707-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two definitions of a positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) in esophageal cancer coexist: one by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) (CRM = 0 mm) and another by the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) (CRM ≤ 1 mm). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of both definitions in esophageal cancer and to identify a new cutoff value for the CRM to predict survival. METHODS Patients who underwent curative esophageal resection for locally advanced (≥ pT3) adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma were selected from 2007 to 2016. The CRM was reassessed using an ocular micrometer. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were estimated with uni- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS The study enrolled 283 patients: 48 with a positive CRM according to the CAP definition and 171 with a positive CRM according to the RCP definition. In the multivariate analysis, a positive CRM according to both definitions was significantly associated with a poor OS (CAP: hazard ratio [HR], 2.26, p < 0.001; RCP: HR, 1.42, p = 0.035). A CRM of 0 mm was predictive of a worse OS and DFS than a CRM of 1 mm or less (p < 0.0001), whereas no significant difference was found between a CRM greater than 1 mm and a CRM of 1 mm or less, indicating that the CAP definition was more accurate for predicting prognosis and recurrence. New cutoff CRM values of 100 µm in squamous cell carcinoma and 200 µm in adenocarcinoma were optimal for predicting OS. CONCLUSION The CAP definition was more accurate for predicting prognosis and recurrence. The study identified a new cutoff value of CRM according to histologic type.
Collapse
|
18
|
Moehler M, Ajani J, Kuzdzal J, Zander T, Van Cutsem E, Piessen G, Mendez G, Feliciano J, Motoyama S, Lièvre A, Uronis H, Elimova E, Grootscholten C, Geboes K, Zhang J, Soleymani S, Lei M, Kondo K, Cleary J, Kelly R. 1381P Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT): 14-month follow-up of CheckMate 577. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
19
|
Markar SR, Sounderajah V, Johar A, Zaninotto G, Castoro C, Lagergren P, Elliott JA, Gisbertz SS, Mariette C, Alfieri R, Huddy J, Pinto E, Scarpa M, Klevebro F, Sunde B, Murphy CF, Greene C, Ravi N, Piessen G, Brenkman H, Ruurda J, van Hillegersberg R, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BP, Pera M, Roigg J, Castro S, Matthijsen R, Findlay J, Antonowicz S, Maynard N, McCormack O, Ariyarathenam A, Sanders G, Cheong E, Jaunoo S, Allum W, van Lanschot J, Nilsson M, Reynolds JV, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Hanna GB. Patient-reported outcomes after oesophagectomy in the multicentre LASER study. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1090-1096. [PMID: 33975337 PMCID: PMC10364861 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on the long-term symptom burden in patients surviving oesophageal cancer surgery are scarce. The aim of this study was to identify the most prevalent symptoms and their interactions with health-related quality of life. METHODS This was a cross-sectional cohort study of patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery in 20 European centres between 2010 and 2016. Patients had to be disease-free for at least 1 year. They were asked to complete a 28-symptom questionnaire at a single time point, at least 1 year after surgery. Principal component analysis was used to assess for clustering and association of symptoms. Risk factors associated with the development of severe symptoms were identified by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS Of 1081 invited patients, 876 (81.0 per cent) responded. Symptoms in the preceding 6 months associated with previous surgery were experienced by 586 patients (66.9 per cent). The most common severe symptoms included reduced energy or activity tolerance (30.7 per cent), feeling of early fullness after eating (30.0 per cent), tiredness (28.7 per cent), and heartburn/acid or bile regurgitation (19.6 per cent). Clustering analysis showed that symptoms clustered into six domains: lethargy, musculoskeletal pain, dumping, lower gastrointestinal symptoms, regurgitation/reflux, and swallowing/conduit problems; the latter two were the most closely associated. Surgical approach, neoadjuvant therapy, patient age, and sex were factors associated with severe symptoms. CONCLUSION A long-term symptom burden is common after oesophageal cancer surgery.
Collapse
|
20
|
Noiret B, Piessen G, Eveno C. Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Definitively Does not Deserve Its Bad Reputation. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5448-5449. [PMID: 33611746 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09741-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
21
|
Denost Q, Rouanet P, Faucheron JL, Panis Y, Meunier B, Cotte E, Meurette G, Portier G, Sabbagh C, Loriau J, Benoist S, Piessen G, Sielezneff I, Lelong B, Mauvais F, Romain B, Barussaud ML, Capdepont M, Laurent C, Rullier E. Impact of early biochemical diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: long-term results from GRECCAR 5 trial. Br J Surg 2021; 108:605-608. [PMID: 33793764 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Elevated C-reactive protein, should be used to prompt early detection of AL prior to the development of clinical symptoms. Early biochemical diagnosis and intervention of AL mitigates the negative impact of AL on oncological outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.
Collapse
|
22
|
Manceau G, Sabbagh C, Mege D, Lakkis Z, Bege T, Tuech JJ, Benoist S, Lefèvre JH, Karoui M, Bridoux V, Venara A, Beyer‐Berjot L, Codjia T, Dazza M, Gagnat G, Hamel S, Mallet L, Martre P, Philouze G, Roussel E, Tortajada P, Dumaine AS, Heyd B, Paquette B, Brunetti F, Esposito F, Lizzi V, Michot N, Denost Q, Rullier E, Tresallet C, Tetard O, Rivier P, Fayssal E, Collard M, Moszkowicz D, Lupinacci R, Peschaud F, Etienne JC, Loge L, Bege T, Corte H, D’Annunzio E, Humeau M, Issard J, Munoz N, Abba J, Jafar Y, Lacaze L, Sage PY, Susoko L, Trilling B, Arvieux C, Mauvais F, Ulloa‐Severino B, Pitel S, Vauchaussade de Chaumont A, Badic B, Blanc B, Bert M, Rat P, Ortega‐Deballon P, Chau A, Dejeante C, Piessen G, Grégoire E, Alfarai A, Cabau M, David A, Kadoche D, Dufour F, Goin G, Goudard Y, Pauleau G, Sockeel P, Villeon B, Pautrat K, Eveno C, Abdalla S, Couchard AC, Balbo G, Mabrut JY, Bellinger J, Bertrand M, Aumont A, Duchalais E, Messière AS, Tranchart A, Cazauran JB, Pichot‐Delahaye V, Dubuisson V, Maggiori L, Panis Y, Djawad‐Boumediene B, Fuks D, Kahn X, Huart E, Catheline JM, Lailler G, Baraket O, Baque P, Diaz de Cerio JM, Mariol P, Maes B, Fernoux P, Guillem P, Chatelain E, de Saint Roman C, Fixot K, Voron T, Parc Y. Colon sparing resection versus extended colectomy for left-sided obstructing colon cancer with caecal ischaemia or perforation: a nationwide study from the French Surgical Association. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1304-1313. [PMID: 32368856 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM It is not known whether patients with obstructive left colon cancer (OLCC) with caecal ischaemia or diastatic perforation (defined as a blowout of the caecal wall related to colonic overdistension) should undergo a (sub)total colectomy (STC) or an ileo-caecal resection with double-barrelled ileo-colostomy. We aimed to compare the results of these two strategies. METHOD From 2000 to 2015, 1220 patients with OLCC underwent surgery by clinicians who were members of the French Surgical Association. Of these cases, 201 (16%) were found to have caecal ischaemia or diastatic perforation intra-operatively: 174 patients (87%) underwent a STC (extended colectomy group) and 27 (13%) an ileo-caecal resection with double-end stoma (colon-sparing group). Outcomes were compared retrospectively. RESULTS In the extended colectomy group, 95 patients (55%) had primary anastomosis and 79 (45%) had a STC with an end ileostomy. In the colon-sparing group, 10 patients (37%) had simultaneous resection of their primary tumour with segmental colectomy and an anastomosis which was protected by a double-barrelled ileo-colostomy. The demographic data for the two groups were comparable. Median operative time was longer in the STC group (P = 0.0044). There was a decrease in postoperative mortality (7% vs 12%, P = 0.75) and overall morbidity (56% vs 67%, P = 0.37) including surgical (30% vs 40%, P = 0.29) and severe complications (17% vs 27%, P = 0.29) in the colon-sparing group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Cumulative morbidity included all surgical stages and the rate of permanent stoma was 66% and 37%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. Overall survival and disease-free survival were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION The colon-sparing strategy may represent a valid and safe alternative to STC in OLCC patients with caecal ischaemia or diastatic perforation.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kelly R, Ajani J, Kuzdzal J, Zander T, Van Cutsem E, Piessen G, Mendez G, Feliciano J, Motoyama S, Lièvre A, Uronis H, Elimova E, Grootscholten C, Geboes K, Zhang J, Zhu L, Lei M, Kondo K, Cleary J, Moehler M. LBA9_PR Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT): First results of the CheckMate 577 study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
|
24
|
Deffain A, Crombé T, Piessen G. RE : Direct laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy. J Visc Surg 2020; 157:169. [PMID: 31959467 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
25
|
Eveno C, Voron T, Piessen G. Correction to: Laparoscopic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Patients with Gastric Peritoneal Metastases: Limitations and Perspectives. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:889. [PMID: 31317378 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07632-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The title of this paper is corrected as reflected here.
Collapse
|