A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Statin Therapy on Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Most of the mortality after Heart Transplantation (HT) is attributed to severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and rejection.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of postoperative statin therapy on outcomes (mortality, rejection, and CAV in HT patients).

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on publications between 1980 and October 2023 in Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Embase databases. Heterogeneity was assessed using Chi-square, I2, and forest plots. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests. Analyses were performed in Stata 15 with significance at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 17 studies comprising 4,627 participants and conducted between 1995 to 2021. Compared to non-users, the odds of mortality were lower among statin users (OR= 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32-0.75, p < 0.001). The odds of CAV were also reduced with statin use (OR= 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.96, p = 0.027). The odds of rejection were not significantly different (OR= 0.69, 95% CI: 0.41-1.15, p = 0.152). However, rejection odds were lower with statins in RCTs (OR= 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21-0.82, p = 0.012) but not in case-control studies (OR= 0.87, 95% CI: 0.49-1.52, p = 0.615). No publication bias was observed with Begg's test, but Egger's test showed possible bias.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found postoperative statin use associated with lower mortality and CAV, but not overall rejection, though RCT subgroup analysis showed decreased rejection with statins. Statin therapy may improve prognosis in HT patients.

Evaluation of Statin Indication and Dose Intensification Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients at a Tertiary Hospital

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and mortality. While guidelines endorse statin use in type 2 DM (T2DM) to mitigate cardiovascular risks and mortality, challenges like statin initiation and prompt treatment adjustments affect patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of indications for and dose intensification of statin therapy among T2DM patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH).

Methodology

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April 1 to June 30 2020. In total, 405 T2DM patients were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. An adjusted odds ratio (OR) was used and a 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-values of <0.05 were utilized to determine statistical significance.

Results

Of the total 405 participants, 346 (85.4%) started taking statins for primary or secondary prevention purposes. Indication for statin use was appropriate in 96.2% patients, while for 216 (62.4%) patients their doses were appropriately intensified. Predictors of the inappropriateness of statin use were an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score of ≥7.5% (AOR=0.28; 95% CI: 0.102-0.738, p=0.01), the presence of dyslipidemia (AOR=4.48; 95% CI: 1.85-10.84; p=0.001), initiation of aspirin therapy (AOR=3.7; 95% CI: 1.522-9.144; p=0.004), and an LDL-cholesterol level of 70-189 mg/dL (AOR=0.124; 95% CI: 0.042-0.365; p=0.001). DM duration of ≥10 years (AOR=2.51; 95% CI: 1.35-4.66, p=0.004), male gender (AOR=2.04; 95% CI: 1.16-3.58, p=0.013), age ≥65 years (AOR=2.15; 95% CI: 1.23-3.75, p=0.007) and uncontrolled blood pressure (AOR=2.09; 95% CI: 1.07-4.08, p=0.031) were associated with inappropriate statin intensification.

Conclusion

The study found that indication of statins was optimal and about two-thirds of patients had their doses appropriately intensified. Monitoring is needed to avoid inappropriate intensification of statin therapy, particularly in patients with longer diabetes duration, those of male gender and advanced age, and those with uncontrolled blood pressure.

The Effect of Statin Therapy on Serum Uric Acid Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Elevated concentrations of serum uric acid (SUA) are associated with several conditions, including cardiovascular disease. The present study aimed to estimate the impact of statin therapy on SUA levels through a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched on January 14, 2022, to identify eligible clinical trials. The intervention group received statins as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs, and the control group received non-statins or placebo. Studies reporting SUA levels before and after treatment were selected for further analysis. Finally, the data were pooled, and the mean changes in SUA, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglycerides were reported.

RESULTS

Out of 1269 identified studies, 23 were included in the review. A total of 3928 participants received statin therapy, and 1294 were included in control groups. We found a significant reduction in SUA levels following statin therapy (mean difference (MD) = -26.67 μmol/L with 95% confidence interval (CI) [-44.75, -8.60] (P =0.004)). Atorvastatin (MD = -37.93 μmol/L [-67.71, -8.15]; P < 0.0001), pravastatin (MD = -12.64 μmol/L [-18.64, -6.65]; P < 0.0001), and simvastatin (MD = -5.95 μmol/L [-6.14, -5.80]; P < 0.0001), but not rosuvastatin, were significantly associated with a reduction in SUA levels. An analysis comparing different types of statins showed that pravastatin 20-40 mg/day could significantly reduce SUA when compared to simvastatin 10-20 mg/day (-21.86 μmol/L [-36.33,-7.39]; P =0.003).

CONCLUSION

Statins were significantly associated with a decrease in SUA levels, particularly atorvastatin, which was found to be most effective in lowering SUA. Atorvastatin may be the most appropriate cholesterol-lowering agent for patients with or at risk of hyperuricemia.

Effect of ABCA1-R219K Polymorphism in Serum Lipid Parameters in Patients under Statin Therapy Visiting Tertiary Cardiac Center of Nepal

Introduction  ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) encoded by ABCA1 gene is one of the important protein involved in lipid metabolism. The effect of statin therapy on dyslipidemia varies among individuals and it may be due to different genetic polymorphism. The R219K polymorphism of ABCA1 gene is found to have a significant role in the response of statin. Objective  This study was designed to evaluate the effect of R219K polymorphism in lipid-lowering action of statin in patients with dyslipidemia. Material and Methods  This study was conducted in 88 patients. Blood samples were taken from patients before and at the end of 3 months of statin use and were analyzed for lipid profile. Whole blood was analyzed for R219K Polymorphism using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Results  R219K polymorphism was associated with significant percentage reduction of serum triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein (TG/HDL) ratio and total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein (TC/HDL) ratio in atorvastatin users. However, there was no significant association of polymorphism with change in serum TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG, and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL). Among KK genotype individuals, value of TG, VLDL, TG/HDL, and TC/HDL were significantly lower than in RR genotypes. Also, TG/HDL and TC/HDL were significantly lower in RK genotype than in RR. Treatment of dyslipidemia with statin was found to be comparatively better in patients having the genotypes KK and RK. Conclusion  Our study demonstrated association of R219K polymorphism with the significant reduction of TG/HDL and TC/HDL and particularly the KK genotype was associated with significant improvement of lipid parameters following atorvastatin treatment.

The Impact of Statin Therapy on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of death all over the world, especially due to myocardial ischemia caused by atherosclerosis that blocks cardiac arteries and leads to arrhythmia and other cardiac diseases. Meanwhile, diabetes mellitus (DM) and elevated cholesterol level are the risk factors for cardiovascular (CV) disease. This noncommunicable disease has become a main concern for us as cardiovascular disease develops in a slow manner without any symptoms in the early stage. Early prevention and intervention have a major impact on improving the outcome of cardiovascular health in diabetic patients. Controlling cholesterol level by administering statin has shown some beneficial impacts in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with DM. This study used a systematic literature review (SLR) approach to give an overview of the current literature and to analyze the effects of statin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with DM. The literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The total number of articles included in the present review is six, obtained from reputable journals published between 2013 and 2023, and we only focused on reviewing six articles for in-depth analysis. The evidence we collected showed a positive outcome in terms of cardiovascular health in persons with DM after statin therapy. However, there are several risk factors that interfere with the effectiveness of statin in diabetic patients.

Discordance of Circulating Non-HDL Cholesterol with LDL Cholesterol Concerning Long-Term Prognosis in Statin-Treated Individuals with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

Some individuals who maintain desirable low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels still experience the progression of atherosclerosis, which may eventually lead to cardiovascular events. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels are quantified to assess residual risk in statin-treated patients with coronary heart disease. The study aimed to estimate the predictive performance of discordance between non-HDL-C and LDL-C on clinical prognosis in statin-treated patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

468 statin-treated patients with previous CABG undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a secondary coronary treatment due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The definition of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) was a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, recurring myocardial infarction, and a need for repeat revascularization. Cox proportional hazards modeling, restricted cubic splines regression, and discordance analysis were conducted to the association between all lipid parameters and the occurrence of MACEs. Discordant values were defined as LDL-C concentrations ≤ 1.8 mmol/L accompanied by non-HDL-C > 2.6 mmol/L.

Results

MACEs occurred in 95 patients over a median follow-up period of 744.5 days. Cox models demonstrated that increased concentrations of non-HDL-C and LDL-C levels were independent risk indicators of MACEs (p < 0.001). The restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a linear relationship between non-HDL-C concentrations and MACEs (p-nonlinear: 0.26), whereas a nonlinear relationship was observed between LDL-C concentrations and MACEs (p < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, the spline curves revealed that the odds of the individuals with desirable LDL-C levels suffering MACEs emerged when non-HDL-C levels were above 2.07 mmol/L. Individuals who exhibited discordance involving high non-HDL-C/low LDL-C levels had an elevated risk of experiencing MACEs compared to those with concordantly low LDL-C and low non-HDL-C levels [hazard ratios (HRs) = 2.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.14-5.22, p = 0.02].

Conclusions

Non-HDL-C levels could predict the residual risk of MACEs in ACS patients with previous CABG and statin therapy that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. A discordance between non-HDL-C and LDL-C in individuals with desirable LDL-C levels could be useful in identifying those with a residual risk of cardiovascular complications.

Gaps in Guideline-Based Lipid-Lowering Therapy for Secondary Prevention in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 322 153 Patients

BACKGROUND

Many patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are not on guideline-recommended statin therapy. We evaluated utilization of statins and other lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), among patients with ASCVD over a 1-year period.

METHODS

LLT and LDL-C levels at the first outpatient visit (January 1, 2017-December 31, 2018) and 1-year follow-up were evaluated using data from Cerner Real-World Data, an electronic health record-derived data set from 92 US health systems. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with high-intensity statin use.

RESULTS

We identified 322 153 patients with ASCVD (median age 69 years, 58.8% men, 81.8% White). Overall, 76.1% of patients were on statins, with only 39.4% on high-intensity statins. Men were more likely to receive high-intensity statins than women (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.30-1.38]). Increasing age was associated with lower odds of statin use (odds ratio, 0.79 per 5-year increase at 60 years [95% CI, 0.78-0.81]). Patients with peripheral artery disease (odds ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.37-0.42]) and cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.70-0.80]) had lower odds of using high-intensity statins than those with coronary artery disease. At baseline, most patients (61.3%) had elevated LDL-C (≥70 mg/dL), including 59.8% of those on low/moderate-intensity statins and 76.1% on no statin; only 45.3% achieved an LDL-C <70 mg/dL at 1 year. Nonstatin LLT use was low (ezetimibe, 4.4%; proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, 0.7%). Among patients on no statin or low/moderate-intensity statin at baseline, 14.8% and 13.4%, respectively, were on high-intensity statins at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ASCVD in routine care, high-intensity statins are underutilized, and uptitration and use of nonstatin therapy are uncommon. Women, older adults, and individuals with noncardiac ASCVD are particularly undertreated. Concerted efforts are needed to address therapeutic inertia for lipid management in patients with ASCVD.

Relationship of Missed Statin Therapy and 10-Year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score to Retear Rate After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND

There is no practical consensus on managing cholesterol in patients with rotator cuff repair despite hyperlipidemia and statin therapy being well-known factors in rotator cuff healing. The 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score is a commonly used guideline to determine statin administration for hyperlipidemia.

PURPOSE

To identify the relationship between retear and preoperative factors, including 10-year ASCVD risk score and statin administration status, and to compare clinical outcomes and retear rates between patients who are taking and not taking statins.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study enrolled 182 patients with a symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tear who underwent arthroscopic repair. Serum lipid profile, 10-year ASCVD risk score, statin eligibility, and statin administration status were assessed. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate cuff integrity at postoperative 6 months: a healed group and a retear group. Radiographic and intraoperative factors related to retear were analyzed. Multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors related to rotator cuff retear. For the subgroup analysis, patients eligible for statin therapy were divided into 2 subgroups according to administration status.

RESULTS

There were 149 (81.9%) patients in the healed group and 33 (18.1%) in the retear group. In the multiple regression analysis, missed statin therapy, 10-year ASCVD risk score, and fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle were the independent factors related to retear. The cutoff value for 10-year ASCVD risk score was 11.85%, with a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.62. In the subgroup analysis of 104 patients eligible for statin therapy, 66 (63.5%; group 1) received statin therapy and 38 (36.5%; group 2) missed it. Group 2 showed a significantly higher retear rate than group 1 (36.8% vs 13.6%; P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Missed statin therapy, 10-year ASCVD risk score, and fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus were the independent factors associated with rotator cuff retear. Patients who missed statin therapy showed a higher retear rate than patients receiving statin therapy. Optimal statin therapy for patients who undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair might improve repair integrity.

Using the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to Identify and Address Provider-Perceived Barriers to Optimal Statin Prescribing and Use in Community Health Centers

Statins are an important but underutilized therapy to prevent cardiovascular events, particularly in high-risk patients. To increase use of statin therapy in high-risk patients, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded a project led by the National Association of Community Health Centers to discover reasons for statin underuse in health centers and identify possible leverage points, particularly among vulnerable and underserved patients. The project further sought to develop training and educational materials to improve statin prescribing for and acceptance in eligible high-risk patients. As a first step, investigators implemented a questionnaire to clinical providers (n = 45) at health centers participating in the project to obtain their perspective on barriers to optimal statin use. We used the practical robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) domains to frame the overall project and guide the development of our questionnaire. This paper summarizes top perceived barriers to patient and health system/provider statin initiation and sustainment, as well as facilitators to prescribing, using PRISM as an organizing framework. Our questionnaire yielded important suggestions related to public awareness, education materials, health information technology (HIT)/data solutions, and clinical guidelines as key factors in optimizing statin use. It also informed the design of patient education resources and provider training tools. Future directions include using the full application of the PRISM implementation science model to assess how well our educational and training resources help overcome barriers to statin use in high-risk patients, including evaluating how key contextual factors influence successful implementation.

Prognostic Role of Polyvascular Involvement in Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease

Background: Statin therapy is recommended for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, PAD patients with polyvascular (PV) extent remain threatened by an increased residual cardiovascular (CV) risk. Purpose: To investigate the association of prescribed statin therapy and mortality in PAD patients with or without PV extent. Methods: A single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study originating from a consecutive registry with 1380 symptomatic PAD patients over a mean observational time of 60 ± 32 months. The association of atherosclerotic extent and statin use (PAD, plus one additional region (CAD or CeVD, [+1 V]), +2 vascular regions (+CAD and CeVD [+2 V]) with the risk of all-cause mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounding factors. Results: The mean age of the study's participants was 72.0 ± 11.7 years, with 36% being female. PAD patients with PV extent [+1 V] and [+2 V] were older and suffered from diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia more often; they, too, had more severely impaired kidney function (all p < 0.0001) compared to patients with PAD only. PAD patients with PV [+1 V] and [+2 V] received better statin medication and reached the recommended LDL-C target compared to PAD-only patients (p < 0.001). Despite better statin treatment, the rate of all-cause mortality was higher in PV patients than in PAD-only patients (PAD only: 13%; [+1 V]: 22%; [+2 V]: 35%; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: PV patients receive better statin therapy than PAD-only patients but nevertheless still have higher mortality rates. Future studies are needed to explore whether more aggressive LDL-lowering treatment for PAD patients may be translated into better prognosis.

Disparate statin prescribing following hospital discharge for stroke or transient ischemic attack: Findings from COMPASS

BACKGROUND

Published guidelines recommend high-intensity statins following an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The authors examined the potential for disparate patterns of statin prescribing in a cluster randomized trial of transitional care following acute stroke or TIA.

METHODS

Medications taken before hospitalization and statins prescribed at discharge among stroke and TIA patients at 27 participating hospitals were examined. Any statin and intensive statin prescribed at discharge were compared by age (<65, 65-75, >75 years), racial category (White vs. Black), sex (male vs. female), and rurality (urban vs. non-urban) using logistic mixed models.

RESULTS

Among 3211 patients (mean age 67 years; 47% female; 29% Black), 90% and 55%, respectively, were prescribed any statin or intensive statin therapy at discharge. White (vs. Black) patients (0.71, 0.51-0.98) less commonly received any statin prescription, while stroke (vs. TIA) patients (1.90, 1.38-2.62) and those residing in urban areas (1.66, 1.07-2.55) more commonly received any statin prescription. Among those prescribed a statin, only 42% of White and 51% of Black patients >75 years. were prescribed an intensive statin; the OR for intensive statin prescribing was 0.44 for patients >75 years and was similar in a subgroup not on a statin previously.

CONCLUSION/RELEVANCE

Following stroke or TIA, statin prescribing remains lower in White patients, in those with TIA, and in those in non-urban areas. Intensive statin prescribing remains limited, particularly in patients >75 years. These data may inform efforts to improve guideline concordant prescribing for post-stroke patients.

High- vs. Low-Intensity Statin Therapy and Changes in Coronary Artery Calcification Density after One Year

Background: Statin therapy promotes the progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC). Comparing patients on high (HIST) vs. low-to-intermediate intensity statin therapy (LIST), randomized controlled trials with a one-year follow-up failed to document a relevant difference in the Agatston score and CAC volume. We evaluated whether statin intensity modifies CAC density at one year. Methods: We performed a pooled analysis of two randomized-controlled trials (BELLES, EBEAT), comparing the effects of HIST (Atorvastatin 80 mg) vs. LIST (Pravastatin 40 mg, Atorvastatin 10 mg) on CAC measures after one year. The differences in CAC density and its change were compared using the two-sided t-test. Results: Data from 852 patients (66.7% female) with available baseline and follow-up CT were evaluated from both trials. HIST vs. LIST more effectively reduced LDL-cholesterol (annualized change: −45.8 ± 38.5 vs. −72.9 ± 46.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Mean CAC density increased from 228.8 ± 35.4 HU to 232.6 ± 37.0 HU (p < 0.0001) at one-year follow-up. Comparing patients on HIST vs. LIST, CAC density at follow-up (HIST: 231.9 ± 36.1 HU vs. LIST: 233.3 ± 37.7 HU, p = 0.59) and its change from baseline (HIST: 4.0 ± 19.1 HU vs. LIST: 3.6 ± 19.6 HU, p = 0.73) did not differ. Subgroup analyses, stratifying by LDL reduction (<median: 2.0 ± 24.3 HU, ≥median: 3.6 ± 21.9 HU, p = 0.34), Agatston score at baseline (<100: 2.6 ± 22.5 HU vs. 3.2 ± 25.6 HU, p = 0.82; ≥100: 4.8 ± 17.0 HU vs. 3.8 ± 16.6 HU, p = 0.44, for HIST vs. LIST; respectively), and equal number of lesions in both CT scans (3.7 ± 20.3 HU vs. 7.0 ± 22.2 HU, p = 0.24) showed similar results. Conclusion: HIST vs. LIST leads to a higher reduction in cholesterol levels, which does not translate into relevant differences in the change of CAC density at one-year follow-up.

The association of lipid-lowering therapy and blood pressure control among outpatients with hypertension at the Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

Background

The lipid-lowering medications known as statins have been shown in controlled clinical trials to have pleiotropic properties, such as lowering blood pressure, in addition to lowering cholesterol levels. The purpose of this study was to see if there was a possible link between blood pressure control and statin therapy in outpatients with hypertension in a real clinical setting.

Patients and methods

A retrospective comparative cohort study of 404 patients with hypertension was carried out. A systematic random sampling technique was used. For data entry, Epi-Data version 4.6 was used, and SPSS version 25 was used for further analysis. For group comparisons, chi-square and independent t-tests were computed. To determine the relationship between statin use and blood pressure control, a binary logistic regression model was employed. To declare statistical significance, a 95% confidence interval and a P-value of <0.05 were used.

Results

Half of the study participants who were using a prescribed statin were assigned to the statin group, whereas the remaining participants who do not take statins were assigned to the control group. After 3 months of statin treatment, BP control to <130/80 mmHg was significantly greater (P = 0.022) in the statin group (52.5%) than in the control group (41.0%). The use of statins raises the likelihood of having blood pressure under control by 1.58 times when compared to statin non-users. After controlling for possible confounders, statin therapy still increased the odds of having controlled BP by a factor of 5.98 [OR = 5.98; 95% CI: 2.77-12.92].

Conclusion

This study revealed that blood pressure control was higher among statin user hypertensive patients. Favorable effects of statin use were independently observed, even after correction for age, presence of dyslipidemia, and duration of antihypertensive therapy. Therefore, the importance of concomitantly added lipid-lowering drugs such as statins and their role in managing poor blood pressure control should be given due emphasis.

Effect of Atorvastatin on Serial Changes in Coronary Physiology and Plaque Parameters

BACKGROUND

The effects of statin on coronary physiology have not been well evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

The authors performed this prospective study to investigate changes in coronary flow indexes and plaque parameters, and their associations with atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Ninety-five patients with intermediate CAD who received atorvastatin therapy underwent comprehensive physiological assessments with fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and intravascular ultrasound at the index procedure, and underwent the same evaluations at 12-month follow-up. Optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was defined as LDL-C <70 mg/dL or ≥50% reduction from the baseline. The primary endpoint was a change in the FFR.

RESULTS

Baseline FFR, minimal lumen area, and percent atheroma volume (PAV) were 0.88 ± 0.05, 3.87 ± 1.28, 55.92 ± 7.30, respectively. During 12 months, the percent change in LDL-C was -33.2%, whereas FFR was unchanged (0.87 ± 0.06 at 12 months; P = 0.694). Vessel area, lumen area, and PAV were significantly decreased (all P values <0.05). The achieved LDL-C level and the change of PAV showed significant inverse correlations with the change in FFR. In patients with optimally modified LDL-C, the FFR had increased (0.87 ± 0.06 vs 0.89 ± 0.07; P = 0.014) and the PAV decreased (56.81 ± 6.44% vs 55.18 ± 8.19%; P = 0.031), whereas in all other patients, the FFR had decreased (0.88 ± 0.05 vs 0.86 ± 0.06; P = 0.025) and the PAV remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CAD, atorvastatin did not change FFR despite a decrease in the PAV. However, in patients who achieved the optimal LDL-C target level with atorvastatin, the FFR had significantly increased with decrease of the PAV. (Effect of Atorvastatin on Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Artery Disease [FORTE]; NCT01946815).

Review of Under-Recognized Adjunctive Therapies for Cancer

Patients and providers may not be aware that several adjunctive measures can significantly improve the quality of life, response to treatment, and possibly outcomes for cancer patients. This manuscript presents a review of practical under-recognized adjunctive therapies that are effective including exercise; stress-reduction techniques such as mindfulness, massage, yoga, Tai Chi, breathing exercises; importance of sleep quality; diet modifications such as calorie restriction at the time of chemotherapy and avoidance of high carbohydrate foods; supplements such as aspirin, green tea, turmeric, and melatonin; and repurposed prescription medications such as metformin and statins. Each recommendation should be tailored to the individual patient to assure no contraindications.

Pharmacotherapy for children with elevated levels of lipoprotein(a): future directions

INTRODUCTION

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). With the advent of the antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeted at LPA, the gene encoding apolipoprotein(a), that are highly effective for lowering Lp(a) levels, this risk factor might be managed in the near future. Given that Lp(a) levels are mostly genetically determined and once elevated, present from early age, we have evaluated future directions for the treatment of children with high Lp(a) levels.

AREAS COVERED

In the current review, we discuss different pharmacological treatments in clinical development and provide an in-depth overview of the effects of ASOs and siRNAs targeted at LPA.

EXPERT OPINION

Since high Lp(a) is an important risk factor for ASCVD and given the promising effects of both ASOs and siRNAs targeted at apo(a), there is an urgent need for well-designed prospective studies to assess the impact of elevated Lp(a) in childhood. If the Lp(a)-hypothesis is confirmed in adults, and also in children, the rationale might arise for treating children with high Lp(a) levels. However, we feel that this should be limited to children with the highest cardiovascular risk including familial hypercholesterolemia and potentially pediatric stroke.

Effects of statins on the inducible degrader of low-density lipoprotein receptor in familial hypercholesterolemia

The inducible degrader of low-density lipoprotein receptor (IDOL) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of LDL receptor (LDLR). Statins lower plasma LDL by activating transcription of hepatic LDLR expression, and we have determined whether statins modulate IDOL expression and influence LDLR protein abundance. IDOL expression in monocytes and serum IDOL level was determined in statin-treated familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients and compared with control subjects. Serum IDOL level was also evaluated in a group of untreated FH patients before and after the initiation of statin. The mechanism underlying the inhibitory effect of statin on IDOL expression was investigated in vitro. In statin-treated FH patients, serum IDOL level and its expression in monocytes was reduced compared with control (P < 0.05). In contrast, untreated FH patients had higher serum levels of IDOL and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexintype 9 (PCSK9) than control (P < 0.05), and serum IDOL level decreased after statin therapy (P < 0.05) whereas an increase was observed in PCSK9 level (P < 0.01). In vitro, atorvastatin significantly decreased IDOL abundance in a dose-dependent manner in cultured macrophages and hepatocytes with a concomitant increase in LDLR expression. The transcription of IDOL was restored by adding either an LXR agonist T0901317 or oxysterol 22(R)-hydroxycholesterol, indicating that statin inhibited IDOL expression by reducing LXR activation. The LXR-IDOL-LDLR axis can be modulated by statins in vitro and in vivo. Statins inhibit IDOL expression by reducing LXR activation and upregulate LDLR, and statins exert the opposite effect on IDOL and PCSK9.

Knowledge, attitude, perceived barriers, and practices among pharmacists regarding risk assessment of cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study in Yemen

BACKGROUND

Risk evaluation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases can guide the decision-making on various preventive measures, such as initiating or deferring statin therapy. Pharmacists can play an active part in the risk evaluation and primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Thus, our study aimed to assess the pharmacists' knowledge, attitude, perceived barriers, and practices regarding risk assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 500 pharmacists using a structured validated questionnaire between November 2020 and February 2021. The Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

A total of 456 pharmacists completed the questionnaire out of 500 distributed (91.2% response rate). Over 60% of participants responded with never or rarely for two out of five cardiovascular diseases (CVD) prevention practices. The lowest pharmacist-patient counseling practices were for side effects of statin medication (14.5%) and reviewing the patient's medications to avoid potential statin-drug interactions (31.8%). Participants had a high positive attitude (median = 34 out of 40). The three major barriers for risk assessment were the lack of support (74.8%), the lack of resources (70.6%), and inadequate training (48.7%). Interestingly, having ≤75 customers a day, community pharmacies, PharmD degree, age ≥30 years, and experience ≥6 years were significantly associated (p < .05) with higher CVD prevention activities and counseling practices.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists have a high positive attitude toward CVD risk assessment. However, they had insufficient knowledge and only provided limited activities and counseling services for CVD prevention and statin therapy. Participants perceived several barriers to CVD risk assessment services in pharmacies. Therefore, it is necessary to remove these impediments for pharmacists to be more involved in CVD risk assessment and prevention. Also, continuing medical education and adequate training for pharmacists are required.

Effects of High- or Moderate-intensity Rosuvastatin on 1-year Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Post-percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: Although statins decrease mortality in coronary artery disease, the effect of high-dose statins and duration of therapy post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well addressed. Aim: To determine the effective dose of statin to prevent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularisation and cardiac death, after PCI in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Methods: In this randomised, double-blind clinical trial, all chronic coronary syndrome patients with a recent history of PCI were randomly divided into two groups after 1 month of high-dose rosuvastatin therapy. Over the next year, the first group received rosuvastatin 5 mg daily (moderate intensity), while the second received rosuvastatin 40 mg daily (high intensity). Participants were evaluated in terms of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and MACEs. Results: The 582 eligible patients were divided into group 1 (n=295) and group 2 (n=287). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sex, age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, previous history of PCI or history of coronary artery bypass grafting (p>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in MACE and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein after 1 year between the two groups (p=0.66). Conclusion: The high-dose group had lower LDL levels. However, given the lack of association between high-intensity statins and MACEs in the first year after PCI among chronic coronary syndrome patients, the use of moderate-intensity statins may be as effective as high-intensity statins, and treatment based on LDL targets may suffice.

Adherence to Clinical Guidelines on STATIN Prescribing Among Diabetic Patients Aged 40-75 Years Old in a Primary Care Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (D.M.) is a chronic metabolic disease caused by decreased insulin secretion, which increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Evidence has shown that statins reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes; moreover, most clinical guidelines recommend statins.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the level and status of adherence to guidelines on statin prescription in patients with diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting in Palestine.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at an ambulatory center in Palestine. Data were collected by auditing prescription records and reviewing medical charts of patients with diabetes who visited the clinic from February 15 to March 17, 2021. The collected data included patient characteristics, comorbidities, lipid profiles, and statin prescription. A chi-square test was used to evaluate the appropriateness of the prescribed statins with different demographic and clinical variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Out Of 262 diabetic patients included in the analysis, 74% were prescribed appropriate statin therapy according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines, and 24% of patients had inappropriate statin therapy or needed statins. Furthermore, 82.8% were on high-intensity statins, while 11% were not taking any statins. More than 60% of patients had uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Most guidelines recommend statin therapy in diabetic patients owing to its benefits in preventing cardiovascular complications. In this study, most patients were on appropriate STATIN therapy; however, 50% of diabetic patients had LDL of more than 100 mg/dl, and 25% were not prescribed statins, increasing their risk of ASCVD. Therefore, we recommend strict adherence to the established guidelines on statins prescribed to patients with diabetes to prevent cardiovascular complications, save lives, and reduce healthcare costs.

Prevention of Osteoarthritis Progression by Statins, Targeting Metabolic and Inflammatory Aspects: A Review

Background and purpose:

Several traditional risk factors of atherosclerosis such as age, obesity, and altered lipid metabolism are shared with osteoarthritis (OA). Metabolic abnormalities and atheromatous vascular disease are linked with systemic inflammation and progression of OA. Hence, treatment of OA with statins is expected to improve metabolic abnormalities and prevent OA progression. Many studies which have addressed this issue found inconsistent results. This review aims to elucidate the effect of statins in OA by summarizing the existing data.

Methods:

Potential studies in English language published in Medline/PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar since 2000 were searched by using keywords such as osteoarthritis, statins, progression, treatment, prevalence, synovitis, pain. Fourteen papers were found to be relevant and were summarised.

Results:

Data regarding symptomatic effect of statins in OA are scarce and the results varied from no effect to a small improvement or even increased risk of pain in knee OA. However, most studies on the incidence and progression of OA found a significant decreased risk of incident OA, as well as reduced risk of radiographic progression in statin users vs. non-users. Factors such as patient adherence, duration of treatment, and higher cumulative statin doses were associated with greater efficacy.

Conclusion:

Existing data indicate a preventing effect of statin therapy on OA progression. However, unless a formal meta-analysis with weight analysis is made, a conclusion cannot be drawn.