Cardiac function in neuropeptide Y Y4 receptor-knockout mice

Autonomic control of cardiovascular function in neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y4 receptor-knockout mice was investigated using pancreatic polypeptide (PP), NPY and specific agonists and antagonists for other NPY receptors well characterised in cardiovascular function. Y4 receptor-knockout mice, anaesthetised with sodium pentobarbitone, displayed slower heart rate, indicated by a higher pulse interval and lower blood pressure compared to control mice. After vagus nerves were cut heart rate increased but was still significantly slower than in control mice. PP had no effect on blood pressure or cardiac vagal activity in either group of mice, which was consistent with earlier studies in other species. Injection of NPY evoked an increase in blood pressure but the response was significantly reduced in Y4 receptor-knockout mice compared to the controls. The reduction in pressor activity was not Y1 mediated as the selective Y1 antagonist, BIBP 3226, was effective in blocking NPY pressor activity in knockout mice. In addition, cardiac vagal inhibitory activity evoked by low doses of NPY was also reduced when compared to control responses. As N-acetyl [Leu(28, 31)] NPY 24-36 inhibited vagal activity dose dependently in both groups of mice with no difference in response at any dose, it is unlikely that this effect also is receptor mediated. We propose that the reduced vasoconstrictor and vagal inhibitory activity evoked by NPY in Y4 receptor-knockout mice is due to a lack of adrenergic tone bought about by a proposed reduction in sympathetic activity, possibly resulting from altered NPY activity secondarily affecting adrenergic transmission. We conclude that Y4 receptor deletion disrupts autonomic balance within the cardiovascular system.

Antiepileptic actions of neuropeptide Y in the mouse hippocampus require Y5 receptors

PURPOSE

Recent evidence suggests an antiepileptic role for neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the central nervous system. The precise receptor subtypes mediating the inhibitory actions of NPY in the hippocampal formation, however, remain unclear. In vitro studies suggest a role for Y2 receptors in modulating excitatory hippocampal synaptic transmission and epileptiform discharge. In vivo studies implicate Y5 receptors. Here we used pharmacologic tools and Y5-receptor knockout mice to examine the role of Y5 receptors in mediating the antiexcitatory and antiepileptic actions of NPY in the hippocampal formation.

METHODS

Hippocampal slices were obtained from age-matched wild-type (WT; 129 s3/svimj) and Y5-receptor knockout (Y5R KO) mice generated on the same background strain. Extracellular or whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were obtained in area CA3 pyramidale. Evoked population spikes or excitatory postsynaptic currents were monitored during bath application of NPY, NPY13-36, or human pancreatic polypeptide (hPP). In some slices, zero-magnesium cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was used to evoke spontaneous epileptiform discharges.

RESULTS

NPY and NPY agonists with preference for either Y2 (NPY13-36) or Y5 (hPP) receptor subtypes caused a significant reduction in population spike and excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) amplitudes in slices from WT mice. NPY (and NPY agonists) also suppressed zero-magnesium epileptiform burst discharge in slices from WT mice. In contrast, bath application of NPY, NPY13-36, or hPP had no effect in slices from Y5R KO mice.

CONCLUSIONS

NPY modulates excitatory synaptic transmission and inhibits limbic seizure activity in the mouse hippocampus. The antiepileptic actions of NPY, in the mouse, appear to require activation of hippocampal Y5 receptors.

Activation of extracellular signal regulated protein kinase by neuropeptide Y and pancreatic polypeptide in CHO cells expressing the NPY Y(1), Y(2), Y(4) and Y(5) receptor subtypes

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), 36-amino acid amidated peptide expressed in central and peripheral neurons, regulates a variety of physiological activities, including food intake, energy expenditure, vasoconstriction, anxiolysis, nociception and ethanol consumption. NPY binds to a family of G-protein coupled receptors whose activation results in inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity. To more fully characterize the signal transduction pathways utilized by the NPY receptor subtypes, the pathways leading to phosphorylation of the extracellular signal regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 (ERK) have been compared in CHO cells expressing each of the four cloned human NPY receptor subtypes, Y(1), Y(2), Y(4) and Y(5). NPY Y(1), Y(2), Y(4) and Y(5) receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation was blocked by pertussis toxin (PTX) exposure, indicating that all four receptors are coupled to inhibitory G(i/o) proteins. Exposure to the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor GF109203X diminished Y(1), Y(2) and Y(4) receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation but completely blocked Y(5) receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation. Additionally, Y(5) receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation was inhibited by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors LY294002 and wortmannin to a greater extent than was Y(1)-mediated ERK phosphorylation. These results demonstrate that in CHO cells, the Y(5) receptor and the Y(1), Y(2) and Y(4) receptors utilize different pathways to activate ERK.

Neuropeptide Y, Y1, Y2 and Y4 receptors mediate Y agonist responses in isolated human colon mucosa

1. The aim of this study was to provide a pharmacological characterization of the Y receptor types responsible for neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) effects upon electrogenic ion transport in isolated human colonic mucosa. 2. Preparations of descending colon were voltage-clamped at 0 mV in Ussing chambers and changes in short-circuit current (I(sc)) continuously recorded. Basolateral PYY, NPY, human PP (hPP), PYY(3 - 36), [Leu(31), Pro(34)]PYY (Pro(34)PYY) and [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY (Pro(34)NPY) all reduced basal I(sc) in untreated colon. Of all the Y agonists tested PYY(3 - 36) responses were most sensitive to tetrodotoxin (TTX) pretreatment, indicating that Y(2)-receptors are located on intrinsic neurones as well as epithelia in this tissue. 3. The EC(50) values for Pro(34)PYY, PYY(3 - 36) and hPP were 9.7 nM (4.0 - 23.5), 11.4 nM (7.6 - 17.0) and 14.5 nM (10.2 - 20.5) and response curves exhibited similar efficacies. The novel Y(5) agonist [Ala(31), Aib(32)]-NPY had no effect at 100 nM. 4. Y(1) receptor antagonists, BIBP3226 and BIBO3304 both increased basal I(sc) levels per se and inhibited subsequent PYY and Pro(34)PYY but not hPP or PYY(3 - 36) responses. The Y(2) antagonist, BIIE0246 also raised basal I(sc) levels and attenuated subsequent PYY(3 - 36) but not Pro(34)PYY or hPP responses. 5. We conclude that Y(1) and Y(2) receptor-mediated inhibitory tone exists in human colon mucosa. PYY and NPY exert their effects via both Y(1) and Y(2) receptors, but the insensitivity of hPP responses to either Y(1) or Y(2) antagonism, or to TTX, indicates that Y(4) receptors are involved and that they are predominantly post-junctional in human colon.

The area postrema lesions alter the inhibitory effects of peripherally infused pancreatic polypeptide on pancreatic secretion

Circulating PP binds to specific receptors in the DVC through the AP, but the mechanism through which these brain receptors affect pancreatic secretion is not clear. We hypothesize that the removal of the AP (APX) will alter the effects of PP on pancreatic secretion. APX or sham procedures were performed in anesthetized male Wistar rats. After a 1-month recovery, one group of rats were infused with either PP (30 or 100 pmol/kg per h) or vehicle under basal or 2-DG-stimulated (75 mg/kg, i.v. bolus) conditions for studying pancreatic exocrine secretion. A second parallel group was sacrificed for examination of PP receptor binding in the brain stem. A third group received an intraperitoneal injection of PP at the dose of 4.15x10(4) pmol/kg (200 microg/kg) and c-fos expression in the brain stem was examined. APX eliminated PP binding sites in the DVC as assessed by autoradiography. PP infusion caused a dose-dependent decrease in basal protein secretion. APX partially reversed PP inhibition of basal protein secretion when infused at 30 pmol/kg per h, and at 100 pmol/kg per h stimulated pancreatic fluid secretion and reversed the inhibition of protein secretion. During 2-DG stimulation the effects of PP and 2-DG on pancreatic fluid and protein secretion were parallel. PP dose-dependently inhibited 2-DG-stimulated secretion in sham rats. APX reduced the pancreatic fluid (54%) and protein (46%) secretory response to 2-DG. However, PP at 30 pmol/kg per h remained a potent inhibitor of 2-DG-stimulated pancreatic secretion in APX rats. This effect was blunted with PP at 100 pmol/kg per h in APX rats, possibly related to the stimulatory effect of high-dose PP in APX rats without 2-DG. Furthermore, i.p. PP induced significantly greater c-fos activation of NTS neurons in APX rats than sham rats, despite the apparent absence of PP binding sites in the DVC. We conclude that in awake rats, PP inhibits basal secretion, in part, through the AP. Furthermore, and unlike PYY, PP inhibits 2-DG-stimulated pancreatic secretion, and it does so through an AP-independent mechanism. The possibility that the mechanism may involve the DVC cannot be excluded since i.p. injection of PP activates c-fos expression in DVC neurons. Thus, PP and PYY may regulate different components of the pancreatic secretory control system through unique pathways.

Feeding responses to several neuropeptide Y receptor agonists in the neonatal chick

Neuropeptide Y is one of the most potent neuropeptides known to induce feeding in animals, and has been suggested to be a physiological signal for food intake. It has been also reported that intracerebroventricular injection of neuropeptide Y stimulates feeding behavior of the neonatal chick. There are many neuropeptide Y receptor agonists that have not been investigated in feeding response of the neonatal chick. The aim of this study is to elucidate whether central injection of several neuropeptide Y receptor agonists stimulates feeding of the neonatal chick over 2 h. We found that central injections of [Leu(31), Pro(34)]neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, human pancreatic polypeptide and rat pancreatic polypeptide significantly stimulated food intake of neonatal chicks throughout the 2-h post-injection period. Neuropeptide Y-(13-36) significantly stimulated feeding at 30 min, but not thereafter. [D-Trp(32)]neuropeptide Y stimulated feeding at 60 and 120 min, but not 30 min, post-injection. Central administration of rat pancreatic polypeptide, which does not increase food intake in rats, stimulated feeding in chicks. This result reflects structural differences of the neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes and/or differences in mechanisms stimulating feeding behavior between mammals and chickens. In conclusion, neuropeptide Y receptor agonists, except for neuropeptide Y-(13-36), are potent stimulators of food intake in the neonatal chick.

Constitutive neuropeptide Y Y(4) receptor expression in human colonic adenocarcinoma cell lines

1. Three human adenocarcinoma cell lines, Colony-24 (Col-24), Col-6 and Col-1 have been studied as confluent epithelial layers able to transport ions vectorially in response to basolateral vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and pancreatic polypeptides (PP). 2. Different species PP stimulated responses in Col-24 with Y(4)-like pharmacology. Bovine (b)PP, human (h)PP and porcine (p)PP were equipotent (EC(50) values 3.0--5.0 nM) while rat (r)PP, avian (a)PP and [Leu(31), Pro(34)]PYY (Pro(34)PYY) were significantly less potent. PYY was inactive. The PP pharmacology in Col-1 was comparable with Col-24. However, Col-6 cells were different; pPP had an EC(50) intermediate (22.0 nM) between that of bPP (3.0 nM) and hPP (173.2 nM), with aPP and rPP being at least a further fold less potent. 3. Deamidation of Tyr(36) in bPP (by O-methylation or hydroxylation) or removal of the residue resulted in significant loss of activity in Col-24. 4. GR231118 (1 microM) had no PP-like effects. In Col-24 and Col-1, GR231118 significantly attenuated bPP (30 nM) or hPP (100 nM) responses, but it did not alter bPP responses in Col-6. BIBP3226 and GR231118 both inhibited Y(1)-mediated responses which were only present in Col-6. 5. RT--PCR analysis confirmed the presence of hY(4) receptor mRNA in Col-24 and Col-1 epithelia but a barely visible hY(4) product was observed in Col-6 and we suggest that an atypical Y(4) receptor is expressed in this cell line.

Receptors for NPY in peripheral tissues bioassays

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and its congeners, peptide YY (PYY) and the pancreatic polypeptide (PP), have a large spectrum of peripheral actions. NPY is found in peripheral neurons, co-localized or not with noradrenaline; PYY and PP are expressed in endocrine cells of the pancreas and in the intestine of vertebrates. NPY is the most abundant peptide in the brain and is involved in the regulation of food intake and of circadian rhythm. It intervenes also in the process of anxiety and memory. NPY is a potent vasoconstrictor, a cardiac stimulant, and may affect the gut through enteric neurons. PYY and PP act mainly on the gastrointestinal system; however, when in blood, they can cross-react with functional sites elsewhere and replace NPY in some parts of the brain (e.g. regions involved in feeding behavior). These peptides act through G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) of which five different types are known and have been cloned (1,2); functional sites (receptors) for NPY have been found in vessels, the gut, and in vasa deferentia (3-6).

Neuropeptides in drug research

Neuropeptides have been a subject of considerable interest in the pharmaceutical industry over the last 20 years or more. Many drug discovery teams have contributed to our understanding of neuropeptide biology but no significant drugs that act selectively upon neuropeptide receptors have yet emerged from the clinic. There are, however, a plethora of clinically useful drugs that act at other classes of neurotransmitter and neuromodulator receptors, many of them discovered over the last 20 years. Nevertheless, we think that the future for the discovery of novel drugs acting at neuropeptide receptors looks bright for two reasons: (1) there has been a substantial increase in our understanding of the function of neuropeptides; and (2) high-throughput screening (HTS) against neuropeptide receptors has now begun to yield many interesting drug-like molecules, rather than peptides, that have the potential to become clinically useful drugs. The objective of this review is to summarise our current understanding of specific areas of neuropeptide biology and pharmacology in the CNS as well as the PNS. We will also speculate on where we think the new generation of neuropeptide agonists and antagonists could emerge from the clinic.

[Nphe(1)]nociceptin-(1-13)NH(2) selectively antagonizes nociceptin effects in the rabbit isolated ileum

When suspended in vitro in isolated organ baths, segments of the rabbit ileum show a fairly strong and stable spontaneous activity, which derives from the continuous release of acetylcholine and the activation of muscarinic receptors, since the activity is completely eliminated by atropine. Dynorphin A (pEC(50): 8.6+/-0.07), neuropeptide Y and its congener human pancreatic polypeptide (pEC(50): 9.40+/-0.10), and nociceptin (pEC(50): 8.08+/-0.12) dose-dependently inhibit the spontaneous activity through the activation of receptors, which are specifically antagonised respectively by naloxone (pA(2): 7.17+/-0.12), 2-(naphtalen-1-ylamino)-3-phenylpropionitrile (JCF 104; pA(2): 5. 80+/-0.10), and [Nphe(1)]nociceptin-(1-13)NH(2) (pA(2): 6.17+/-0.19). This last compound, a selective nociceptin-receptor (OP(4)) antagonist, inhibits the effect of nociceptin in a competitive manner, as demonstrated by Schild analysis. [Nphe(1)]nociceptin-(1-13)NH(2) also antagonizes the effects of other OP(4) receptor ligands such as the full agonist, nociceptin-(1-13)-NH(2), and the partial agonists, [Phe(1)psi(CH(2)-NH)Gly(2)]nociceptin-(1-13)-NH(2) (intrinsic activity (alpha(E))=0.5) and Ac-RYYWK-NH(2) (alpha(E)=0.5), with pA(2) values ranged from 5.8 to 6.2. These results indicate that the functional site mediating the inhibitory effect of nociceptin in the rabbit ileum, is pharmacologically identical to the OP(4) sites of other species (mouse, rat, guinea pig, man), since the potencies (pA(2) values) of the pure and competitive antagonist [Nphe(1)]nociceptin-(1-13)NH(2) is very similar to the values obtained in the other species. Moreover, the rabbit ileum is one of the few isolated organs that allow classifying compounds, which interact with OP(4) receptors as full agonists, partial agonists, or pure antagonists.

L-152,804: orally active and selective neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor antagonist

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) elicits food intake through the action of hypothalamic G-protein-coupled receptors. Previous publications indicate that the Y5 receptor may represent one of these postulated hypothalamic "feeding" receptors. Using a potent and orally available Y5 antagonist L-152,804, we evaluated the involvement of the Y5 receptor in feeding regulation. L-152,804 displaced [125I]peptide YY (PYY) binding to human and rat Y5 receptors with Ki values of 26 and 31 nM, respectively, and inhibited NPY (100 nM)-induced increase in intracellular calcium levels via human Y5 receptors (IC50 = 210 nM). L-152,804 did not show significant affinity for human Y1, Y2, and Y4 receptors at a dose of 10 microM. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) (30 microg) or oral (10 mg/kg) administration of L-152,804 significantly inhibited food intake evoked by i.c.v.-injected bovine pancreatic peptide (bPP, 5 microg; a moderately selective Y4, Y5 agonist) in satiated SD rats. However L-152,804 did not significantly inhibit i.c.v. NPY (5 microg; a Y1, Y2, Y5 agonist)-induced food intake. These findings suggest that L-152,804 is a selective and potent non-peptide Y5 antagonist with oral bioavailability and brain penetrability. In addition, the anorexigenic effects of L-152,804 on bPP-induced feeding revealed participation of the Y5 receptor in feeding regulation, while i.c.v. administration of NPY does not appear to significantly contribute to Y5 stimulated food intake. We conclude that the potent and orally active Y5 antagonist, L-152,804, represents a useful tool to address the physiological role of the Y5 receptor.

Neuropeptide Y and peptide YY, but not pancreatic polypeptide, substance P, cholecystokinin and gastric inhibitory polypeptide, inhibit the glucagon- and noradrenaline-dependent increase in glucose output in rat liver

OBJECTIVE

The gastrointestinal peptides neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), substance P (SP), cholecystokinin (CCK) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) are released into the portal vein mainly during the absorptive phase. Their direct actions and their hormone modulatory effects on liver carbohydrate metabolism were investigated.

METHODS

Isolated rat liver, single-pass-perfused via both the hepatic artery (120 cm H2O, 30% flow) and the portal vein (20 cm H2O, 70% flow) with a Krebs-Henseleit buffer containing 5 mM glucose, 2 mM lactate and 0.2 mM pyruvate, NPY (5 nM), PYY (5 nM), PP (5 nM), SP (100 nM), CCK (100 nM) and GIP (10 nM) was infused for 10 min via either vessel. In additional experiments, insulin (100 nM), glucagon (1 nM) or noradrenaline (1 microM) were applied for 5 min via the portal vein during a 20 min portovenous infusion of one of the peptides.

RESULTS

Under basal conditions, neither arterial nor portal NPY, PYY, PP, SP, CCK or GIP modified hepatic glucose and lactate metabolism. Also, none of the peptides enabled an action of portal insulin in the normally insulin-insensitive isolated perfused rat liver. NPY and PYY, but not PP, SP, CCK or GIP, inhibited the increase in glucose release by glucagon and noradrenaline. Under basal conditions, none of the peptides altered hepatic flow. Only portal NPY and PYY enhanced slightly the noradrenaline-dependent reduction of portal flow.

CONCLUSIONS

NPY, PYY, PP, SP, CCK and GIP do not act directly as regulators of basal hepatic carbohydrate metabolism. NPY and PYY act as signal factors of the absorptive phase function as antagonists of the postabsorptive glucose regulatory hormones glucagon and noradrenaline.

Inhibitory effects of NPY on ganglionic transmission in myenteric neurones of the guinea-pig descending colon

Intracellular recordings were made from myenteric neurones of the guinea-pig descending colon. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and related pancreatic polypeptides were applied by superfusion and the effects upon the amplitude of fast excitatory synaptic potentials (ESPs) and the ratio of paired fast ESPs evoked by stimulation of internodal fibre tracts were noted. NPY produced a concentration-dependent inhibition in fast ESP amplitude in the majority of neurones (17/21) with a calculated IC50 value of 7 nM; in some neurones this inhibition was mediated via the local release of noradrenaline. Peptide YY (PYY) (eight out of 11 neurones; IC50 = 1 nM), NPY(3-36) (three out of three neurones) and [Leu31, Pro34]NPY (four out of five neurones) also decreased the amplitude of fast ESPs. The effects of two or more pancreatic polypeptides or analogues on fast synaptic transmission were compared directly in six neurones; the apparent relative potency of agonists suggested the involvement of Y2-receptors and at least one other Y-receptor type. In the absence of any direct postsynaptic effects of pancreatic polypeptides on the active or passive properties of myenteric neurones, or on their sensitivity to ionophoretically applied acetylcholine, inhibition of fast ganglionic transmission was presumed to be presynaptic in origin. It is concluded that, in addition to their previously described depressant actions on neuro-effector transmission to colonic smooth muscle, pancreatic polypeptides can exert powerful inhibitory effects on myenteric neurones of the descending colon.

Actions of neuropeptide Y on the rat adrenal cortex

Although several studies have demonstrated the presence of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in nerves supplying the mammalian adrenal cortex, its function in this tissue remains unclear, with reports of both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on aldosterone secretion apparently depending on the tissue preparation used. In the present study the effects of NPY on rat adrenal capsular tissue were investigated. NPY significantly stimulated aldosterone secretion in a dose-dependent manner, and this effect was abolished by atenolol, a beta1-adrenergic antagonist. NPY also stimulated the release of catecholamines from intact rat adrenal capsular tissue with the same dose-dependent relationship as the stimulation of aldosterone release. These observations suggest that the actions of NPY may be mediated by the local release of catecholamines from chromaffin cells within adrenal capsular tissue, as we have previously described for vasoactive intestinal peptide. The second part of this study concerned the NPY receptor subtype mediating the actions of NPY on the adrenal cortex. It was found that peptide YY stimulated aldosterone release with a comparable potency to NPY, whereas pancreatic polypeptide (PP) was without effect. The Y1 selective NPY analog Leu31Pro34NPY had a greater effect on aldosterone release than the Y2 selective analog NPY18-36. Studies using the specific Y1 receptor antagonist BIBP 3226 showed significant attenuation of the aldosterone response to NPY, but no effect on the response to added norepinephrine. Binding studies carried out using [125I]NPY revealed the presence of a single population of NPY-binding sites with a Kd of 12.25 nmol/liter and a binding capacity of 623 fmol/mg protein. Competition studies revealed displacement of [125I]NPY specific binding by NPY, peptide YY, and Leu31Pro34NPY, but not by other peptides. Messenger RNA analysis revealed the presence of messenger RNA coding for both the Y1 receptor and the Y4 receptor, but not the other subtypes. Taken together these data suggest that the effects of NPY on the rat adrenal cortex are mediated by the Y1 receptor subtype.

Mouse pancreatic polypeptide modulates food intake, while not influencing anxiety in mice

This study was designed to investigate the effects of synthetic mouse pancreatic polypeptide (mPP) on feeding and anxiety in mice. The intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of mPP (0.003-3 nmol) dose-dependently increased food intake. A significant increase was observed 20 min after i.c.v. injection and continued for 4 h. The intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of mPP (0.03-30 nmol) dose-dependently decreased food intake. A significant decrease was observed 20 min after i.p. injection and continued for 4 h. In the elevated plus maze test, the i.c.v. injection of mPP (0.003-3 nmol) did not affect anxiety behavior. These results suggest that mPP modulates food intake and the Y4 receptor in the brain may contribute to the regulation of feeding, whereas appearing not to influence anxiety in mice.

Evidence that stimulation of two modalities of pituitary luteinizing hormone release in ovarian steroid-primed ovariectomized rats may involve neuropeptide Y Y1 and Y4 receptors

A large body of evidence indicates that neuropeptide Y (NPY) is involved in stimulation of basal and cyclic release of hypothalamic LHRH and pituitary LH. To identify the NPY receptor subtypes that mediate the excitatory effects of NPY in these two modalities of LH release, we studied the effects of 1229U91, a selective Y1 receptor antagonist and Y4 receptor agonist, in two experimental paradigms that reproduce the two modalities of LH secretion in steroid-primed ovariectomized (OVX) rats. Rats were ovariectomized and implanted with a permanent cannula into the lateral cerebroventricle. In the first experiment, rats received estradiol benzoate (EB, 30 microg/rat) on day 5, followed 2 days later with progesterone (2 mg/rat) at 1000 h to induce an afternoon LH surge. 1229U91 (30 microg/3 microl) or vehicle (control) was injected intracerebroventricularly into these rats either once at 1300 h or twice (15 microg/injection) at 1100 and 1200 h. Blood samples were collected before progesterone injection at 1000 h and at hourly intervals from 1300 -1800 h via an intrajugular cannula implanted on the previous day. In control rats, serum LH levels rose significantly at 1400 h, and these high levels were maintained until 1700 h. After two injections of 1229U91, LH levels displayed a tendency to rise at 1300-1400 h, as in controls, but thereafter, decreased rapidly below the control range. In the second experiment, the acute effect of 1229U91 on LH release was evaluated in OVX rats pretreated with EB alone. Saline alone or saline containing 1, 3, 10, or 30 microg 1229U91 was injected intracerebroventricularly at 1000 h, and the effects on LH release were analyzed at 10, 20, 30, and 60 min. 1229U91 elicited a dose-dependent stimulation of LH release, with maximal response (950% of basal levels) occurring at 10 min after the 30-microg dose; elevated levels were maintained for 1 h. Because 1229U91 is a potent Y4 agonist with some affinity for Y5 receptors, these results raised the possibility that activation of Y4/Y5 receptors by 1229U91 may augment LH release. Therefore, we examined the effects of icv administration of rat pancreatic polypeptide, a Y4-selective agonist, and [D-Trp32]-NPY, a Y5 agonist on LH release in EB-primed rats. Rat pancreatic polypeptide (0.5-2 microg/rat) stimulated LH release in a dose-related manner, and peak levels (280% of basal levels) were seen at 10-20 min; the response evoked by a higher dose (10 microg) was smaller than that induced by 0.5 or 2 microg. [D-Trp32]-NPY was relatively less effective, because only the highest (10-microg) dose elicited a modest stimulation (244% of basal levels). These results demonstrate that 1229U91, a Y1 antagonist and Y4 agonist, evokes two types of responses; it suppresses the protracted ovarian steroid-induced LH surge, and acutely, it also stimulates LH. These results imply that normally two different types of NPY receptors may mediate the stimulation of LH release. Because 1229U91 is a Y1 receptor antagonist, inhibition of the steroid-induced LH surge by 1229U91 suggests that Y1 receptors may mediate the cyclic release of LH. On the other hand, acute stimulation of LH by 1229U91 implies that the Y4 agonist-like activity of 1229U91 may mediate the basal release of LH and that either NPY or a yet-to-be-identified endogenous Y4 receptor agonist may activate Y4 receptors in the hypothalamus to stimulate LH release.

Feeding response to neuropeptide Y-related compounds in rats treated with Y5 receptor antisense or sense phosphothio-oligodeoxynucleotide

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), NPY 3-36 and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) increase short-term (2-h) food intake to varying degrees when given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.). Various Y receptor subtypes are proposed to participate in Y receptor ligand-induced stimulation of food intake. Here, we used an antisense phosphothio-oligodeoxynucleotide sequence (-5 relative to the initiating ATG) to the Y5 receptor subtype, which has been suggested to mediate NPY-induced feeding. Rats were treated with i.c.v. antisense or sense phosphothio-oligodeoxynucleotide for 3.5 days before NPY, NPY 3-36, or PP i.c.v. administration. The results show that antisense to the Y5 receptor had no effect on either spontaneous 2-h or NPY-, NPY 3-36-, or PP-stimulated 2-h food intake. However, there was a significant decrease relative to the sense control group in 10-h food intake following the initial 2-h feeding response to NPY (n = 10, p < 0.0001) or NPY 3-36 (n = 10, p < 0.05). The data suggest that the Y5 receptor has a modulatory role in the maintenance of feeding, but not as the critical receptor to confer for NPY and NPY 3-36 action on food intake.

NPY receptor subtype in the rabbit isolated ileum

1. The purpose of this work was to verify the hypothesis that the rabbit ileum is a selective preparation for the NPY Y5 receptor by using new selective antagonists recently synthesized. Spontaneous contractions of the rabbit isolated ileum were recorded and binding experiments were performed in cells expressing the human NPY Y1, Y2, Y4 or Y5 receptor subtype. 2. NPY analogues produced a concentration-dependent transient inhibition of the spontaneous contractions of the rabbit ileum with the following order of potency hPP > rPP > PYY > or = [Leu31,-Pro34]-NPY > NPY >> NPY13-36. Pre-exposure to rPP, PYY, [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY or NPY (but not NPY13-36) inhibited the effect of subsequent administration of hPP suggesting cross-desensitization of the preparation. The apparent affinity of the various agonists studied was correlated to the affinity reported for the human Y4 receptor subtype (and to a lesser extent for the rat Y4 subtype) but not to the affinity for the Y5 receptor subtype. 3. BIBO 3304, a selective NPY Y1 receptor antagonist, and CGP 71683A, a selective NPY Y5 receptor antagonist, did not affect the response to hPP. JCF 109, another NPY Y5 receptor antagonist, produced an inhibition of the response to hPP but only at the highest dose tested (10 microM) which also, by itself, produced intrinsic inhibitory effects. 4. 1229U91, a non-selective ligand for Y1, Y2, Y4 and Y5 receptors with high affinity toward the Y1 and Y4 receptor subtypes, produced a concentration-dependent transient inhibition of the spontaneous contractions of the rabbit ileum and a dose-dependent inhibition of the response to hPP (apparent pKB: 7.2). 5. These results suggest that in the rabbit ileum, the NPY receptor involved in the inhibition of the spontaneous contractile activity is a NPY Y4 receptor subtype.

Neuropeptide Y-related compounds and feeding

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and related compounds increase short-term feeding. Previous studies have used different animal models, feeding schedules, sources of the compounds, and time and routes of administration. These differences in methodology are important in the variability reported on the potency of NPY-related compounds. To obtain reliable data on the relative efficacy, we tested NPY, NPY 3-36, and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) using an identical protocol and the same commercial source. These three NPY-related compounds were tested using the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v., into the third ventricle) administration, and the profile of the feeding enhancement including the dose response and potency was determined. Compounds were tested in parallel on at least 2 successive days. NPY, NPY 3-36, and PP exhibited different potencies in enhancing 2-h food intake. Comparison of their dose responses (using 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 microg/rat) demonstrated an overall potency of NPY 3-36 > NPY > PP for the high doses. To study ligand interactions, we examined the effects of various combinations of NPY-related compounds administered concomitantly. These combinations were justified based on the data obtained from the individual dose responses. The data show that the effects of NPY plus NPY 3-36 or NPY 3-36 plus PP were less than additive. When compared to the individual responses, the effects of NPY 3-36 were almost identical to those induced by the combinations using low doses of NPY plus NPY 3-36, or low and high doses of PP plus NPY 3-36. The results support the notion that NPY and its analogues induce a short-term feeding response by activating multiple receptor subtypes.

Neuropeptide Y receptors involved in calcium channel regulation in PC12 cells

Our laboratory has previously used NGF-differentiated PC12 cells as a sympathetic neuronal model to investigate the effects of NPY on catecholamine synthesis and release. We have additionally used these cells to demonstrate the NPY-induced inhibition of Ca2+ channels which was suggested by those studies. In the present work, multiple NPY, PYY, and PP analogs are utilized to further define the receptor subtypes involved in this Ca2+ channel modulation. We find that in PC12 cells NPY and PP modulate Ca2+ channels through Y1, Y2, Y3, and Y4 receptors. In addition, we show that these receptors are differentially coupled to N, L, and non-N, non-L Ca2+ channel subtypes. The results of the present study in combination with our previous investigations demonstrate an intriguing and complex role for NPY and PP in the modulation of sympathetic neurotransmission.

NPY-induced feeding involves the action of a Y1-like receptor in rodents

We have reported that the potent peptidic Y1 antagonist, 1229U91, significantly suppressed NPY-induced and spontaneous feeding [32,33]. However, information on the precise selectivity of 1229U91 for NPY receptors is lacking. The Y5 receptor has been considered a key receptor for feeding regulation. In the present study we showed that 1229U91 has high affinities for the human and rat Y1 receptors (Ki = 0.041 nM and 0.16 nM, respectively) and also a high affinity for the human Y4 receptor (Ki = 0.33 nM), whereas it shows moderate affinities for the human Y2, Y5 and rat Y5 receptors (K values of 20-170 nM). Moreover, 1229U91 potently inhibits NPY-induced [Ca2+]i increases in cells expressing human Y1 receptors. In contrast, 1229U91 is an agonist at other NPY receptors like the Y2, Y4 and Y5 receptors. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.)-injected 1229U91 (30 microg/head) significantly suppressed human NPY-induced feeding in SD rats, while 1229U91 only moderately inhibited bovine pancreatic polypeptide (bPP; an in vivo Y5 agonist)-induced feeding. These results indicate that the food intake evoked by NPY might be mediated by the Y1 receptor, rather than the Y5 receptor. Thus, the Y1 receptor or possibly a novel Y1-like receptor sensitive to 1229U91 may play a key role in the regulation of NPY-induced feeding.

Thioperamide, a histamine H3 receptor antagonist, suppresses NPY-but not dynorphin A-induced feeding in rats

Whether or not neuropeptide Y (NPY)-induced feeding in rats is influenced by the histaminergic system in the brain was investigated by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of a selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist prior to i.c.v. administration of NPY. NPY (10 microg/10 microl) strongly induced feeding in sated rats during the light phase of the day. Dynorphin A1-17 (10 microg/10 microl), a kappa-opioid agonist, and rat pancreatic polypeptide (rPP, 30 microg/10 microl) also stimulated ingestive behavior in sated rats, but food intake in both cases was less than that induced by NPY. Thioperamide maleate, a specific histamine H3 receptor antagonist (408.5 microg/10 microl) reduced the feeding response to NPY by 52% (P < 0.0001), but not to dynorphin A1-17 and rPP. Thioperamide at i.c.v. doses of 40.8-408.5 microg/10 microl had no effect on food intake in sated rats. These results suggest that the thioperamide may have a specific effect on NPY receptor-mediated neuronal systems related to feeding.

Is there really an NPY Y3 receptor?

NPY is an abundant neuropeptide that is widely distributed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems. Based on pharmacological and cloning data, there are believed to be six different types of NPY receptors. The Y3 receptor is the only one of the six that has not been cloned or well characterized. Y3 receptors have been shown to be important in the regulation of visceral afferents within the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS). In the present experiments, we have compared the effects of NPY and various analogs on Ba2+ currents in acutely dissociated neurons from the NTS and the neighboring area postrema (AP). No neurons from either NTS or AP responded to [D-Trp32]NPY suggesting that these areas lack Y5 receptors. However, we found a group of NTS neurons that only responded to NPY and not PYY or any other analogs. This agonist profile corresponds to that described for NPY Y3 receptors. No AP neurons showed this type of agonist profile. Other neurons responded to a variety of NPY analogs indicating the presence of Y1, Y2, and Y4 receptors in both nuclei.

Bioassays for NPY receptors: old and new

Classical pharmacology performed on isolated organ preparations is an essential tool for receptor characterization and classification. Basic pharmacological parameters (e.g. ED50, ID50, pD2, pA2 as measures of apparent affinities) obtained by relating the agent concentration with the biological effect are the final results of the various steps required for drug action and necessarily reflect the complex mechanisms of cell function. Results obtained with bioassays are therefore a useful and essential part in the assessment of endogenous systems, in the present case, the NPY family of peptides and their receptors. An attempt has been made, in the present review, to present a choice of isolated organs that may provide a starting point towards the construction of a solid classical pharmacology of receptors for NPY and congeners. Some of these organs appear to be 'monoreceptor systems' (e.g. the rabbit saphenous vein) whose response is contributed by a single receptor type, others (e.g. the rat colon) are 'multiple receptor systems' and their pharmacology is much too complex and requires the use of a variety of compounds from the naturally occuring peptides, to some selective agonists and when available, specific and selective antagonists. Such compounds have been utilised by us and other workers to detect specific biological responses to NPY and congeners in peripheral tissues: such responses have been quantified, carefully analysed in pharmacological terms and characterized as biological effects mediated by Y1 (the rabbit saphenous vein), Y2 (dog saphenous vein, rat vas deferens, rat colon), Y4 (rat colon) and Y5 (rabbit ileum) receptors. Compared to findings obtained with binding assays and molecular biology experiments, the results of the bioassays show very interesting similarities. Much remains however to be done in view of providing the classical pharmacological bases that are needed in the field of NPY.