Abstract WMP9: Endovascular Thrombectomy Impact in the First Three “Golden” Hours

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) substantially increases the likelihood of good outcome in acute ischemic strokes due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Expediting EVT to achieve faster reperfusion is an important factor that correlates with good outcome. Ultra-early intervention in the first 3 “golden” hours from onset was not well characterized in recent trials.

Objective: We sought to assess the impact of early treatment within the first 3 hours on clinical outcomes in large, real life, world-wide practice.

Methods: We analyzed a multicenter international prospective cohort study of LVO patients treated with stent retriever thrombectomy (TREVO Registry) between11/2013 and 4/2016. We stratified patients based on treatment time, onset to groin puncture (GP), into 3 groups: 0-3, 3-6, >6 hrs. 90 day mRS was the primary outcome (0-2 good outcome). Logistic regression modeling was performed to evaluate the impact of treatment within the golden 3 hours on outcomes and to determine the independent factors associated with EVT initiation within 3 hours.

Results: In the 905 patients, GP occurred in: 23.1% 0-3 hrs, 44.3% 3-6 hrs and 32.6% >6 hrs. Table 1 shows similar baseline characteristics among the groups. Patient-level predictors of treatment within 3 hrs were age (aOR 1.1 per decade of age ≥18) and good ASPECTS (aOR 1.2 per point). No hospital-level predictors of early treatment were found. Patients treated within 3 hrs have a higher likelihood of good outcome as compared to those treated >3 hrs (aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.9; p <0.001) after adjustment for age, NIHSS, IV tPA and mTICI ≥2b (Table 2). No differences were found in mortality and sICH. Treatment in the golden hours had the highest impact on excellent outcome rates (mRS 0-1) (Fig 1).

Conclusion: Early thrombectomy of LVO strokes, within the first three hours provides the highest impact compared with later time windows. Streamlining processes to deliver rapid intervention within 3 hours would improve clinical outcomes.

Abstract TP20: Uncertainties of Endovascular Therapy Outside the AHA Guidelines

Background: The efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for acute strokes due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) led to AHA guidelines recommending EVT as standard of care for selected patients. However, many conditions were under-represented in the RCTs: ASPECTS <6, age ≥80 yo, NIHSS <6, onset to treatment >6 hrs and M2/ distal/ posterior circulation occlusions.

Objective: We evaluated EVT outcomes in these populations compared to counterparts represented in the RCTs.

Methods: A large multicenter international prospective cohort study of LVO patients treated with stent retriever thrombectomy (TREVO Registry) between 11/2013 and 4/2016 was analyzed. 90 day mRS was the primary outcome (0-2 good outcome). Multivariate logistic regression modeling was employed to evaluate EVT impact in the different groups.

Results: Of 1000 patients, 81 had NIHSS <6 and 81.5% of those achieved a good outcome (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.9-6.8; p< 0.001 compared with NIHSS ≥6) (Table 1). Over 80 yo, however, had low odds of independence (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5; p <0.001 compared with <80 yo). Among 212 patients treated >6 hrs, 51% had a good outcome (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.55-1.1; p =0.17) compared to ≤6 hrs. Nearly half of patients with ASPECTS <6 (3-5) had a good outcome. Fig 1 illustrates mRS distributions stratified by the different subgroups. There were low rates of sICH for treated patients with NIHSS<6, age≥80, ASPECTS <6 or treatment >6 hrs. Fig 2 demonstrates the likelihood of good outcome by clot location. M2 and distal occlusions had the highest good outcome probabilities while proximal ICAs had the lowest (48.1%). More than half of vertebrobasilar patients achieved independence (54.8%).

Conclusion: While effectiveness cannot be determined in the absence of medically treated controls, our analyses of real world data show several groups outside AHA guidelines may benefit from EVT. In particular, further study is needed to examine EVT benefits for mild stroke and M2 occlusions.

Abstract WMP11: Joint Commission Certified Stroke Centers Treat More Severe Strokes with Faster Procedure Times Compared to Non-joint Commission Certified Stroke Centers in the Trevo Registry

Introduction: Endovascular stroke therapy has become the gold standard treatment for large vessel occlusion. The Joint Commission has certified hospitals as Comprehensive stroke centers (JCCSC) based on rigorous standards in the hopes of identifying centers of excellence. We sought to determine if JCCSC have faster door to reperfusion times compared to non-JCCSC.

Methods: The TREVO registry is a multicenter international real world registry assessing angiographic and clinical outcomes with the Trevo device being used in the first pass. We defined a CSC as certified by the Joint Commission as of July 1, 2016. Demographic information, times within the hospital, angiographic results and clinical outcomes were analyzed between the JCCSC and non-JCCSC institutions.

Results: A total of 507 patients (329 JCCSC, 178 non-JCCSC) have completed data in the Trevo registry to date. There are a higher proportion of patients with ASPECTS < 7 being treated at JCCSC vs. non-JCCSC (8.8% vs. 0.0%, p<0.02). There were no differences in outcomes, reperfusion rates or symptomatic hemorrhage rates between the two groups. Demographics were similar except patients treated at a JCCSC had a higher median NIHSS [17 vs. 15, p<0.003] compared to the non-JCCSC group. Median (IQR) door to puncture times did not differ between the two groups [85(57-132) vs. 91(59-137), p<0.96], but patients treated at a JCCSC had lower mean angiographic procedure times [59 ± 34 minutes vs. 66±44 minutes, p<0.05]. The analysis did not change when we looked at the subset of patients who were not transferred with anterior circulation strokes less than 8 hours from onset.

Conclusions: Patients treated at a JCCSC had faster procedural times, without faster door to procedure times when compared to non-JCCSC centers. Outcomes were no different, due to imbalances in stroke severity at baseline and a higher proportion of patients with ASPECTS < 7 being treated.

Abstract 37: ASPECTS and Stratified Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy in the Trevo Retriever Registry: Benefit in Low ASPECTS

Background: Most endovascular stroke therapy studies and subsequent guidelines restrict intervention based on ASPECTS. A wide range of ASPECTS scores may be encountered in practice and individual patient benefit may be realized even at low ASPECTS. We examined large-scale data on outcomes after endovascular therapy, stratified by baseline ASPECTS in the Trevo Retriever Registry.

Methods: The independent Imaging Core Lab of the Trevo Retriever Registry prospectively determines ASPECTS on baseline imaging acquired immediately prior to endovascular thrombectomy. ASPECTS scores and regional involvement were analyzed with respect to site of arterial occlusion, effect of time from symptom onset, co-morbidities and clinical outcomes, based on ASPECTS strata.

Results: Baseline ASPECTS data was reviewed by the Imaging Core Lab in 426 subjects with anterior circulation stroke enrolled in the Trevo Retriever Registry, as of July 2016. Mean age was 68.8 ± 13.7 yrs, with 20.9% > 80 years old. Baseline NIHSS was median 15.0 (10.0, 19.0). Onset to CT was median 3.8 (1.5, 9.0) hrs, with median ASPECTS of 8.0 (7.0, 9.0), ranging from 3-10. Baseline ASPECTS 0-7 occurred in 118/426 (27.7%) subjects, including 39.0% of ICA, 27.1% M1 and 16.9% M2/3 arterial occlusions at angiography. Baseline clinical variables predicting ASPECTS included age and NIHSS, whereas the ASPECTS score was mildly associated with final TICI2C reperfusion (r=0.24, p<0.001). Subsequent symptomatic ICH was 1.7% with baseline ASPECTS 0-7 versus 2.0% with ASPECTS 8-10. The distribution of mRS at 90 days based on individual ASPECTS strata from 10 to 3 revealed a trend to worse outcomes with lower ASPECTS, yet good outcomes (mRS 0-2) were 60.7% (ASPECTS 10), 55.3% (9), 60.2% (8), 54.9% (7), 55.1% (3-6).

Conclusions: Discrete ASPECTS strata may influence outcomes of endovascular therapy conducted in routine practice around the world, yet individuals with low ASPECTS may still achieve reasonable outcomes.

Abstract WP6: Real-World Data on Reperfusion: Evidence of Good Outcomes in the International Trevo Retriever Registry

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy trials established efficacy in acute ischemic stroke, yet real-world data on device effectiveness is warranted. Core lab adjudication of angiography is required to validate reperfusion, providing evidence and detailed data beyond randomized, controlled trials. We report the largest endovascular therapy registry data linking independent core lab data on reperfusion with clinical outcomes.

Methods: The Trevo Retriever Registry is a prospective, open-label, consecutive enrollment, multicenter, international registry with more than 65 enrolling sites worldwide. An independent Imaging Core Lab, blind to all other data, evaluates the angiography with a battery of various TICI scores (mTICI, oTICI, oTICI2C) to define reperfusion. Statistical analyses examined TICI reperfusion and association with clinical outcomes considering expansive data collected in the registry.

Results: 506 enrolled subjects (mean age 68.2 ± 14.2 yrs; 53% female) had core lab adjudicated angiography as of July 2016, including 21.5% > 80 years old. Baseline NIHSS was median 15.0 (9.0, 20.0) with time from onset to CT of median 4.0 (1.7, 9.7) hrs. Core lab adjudicated arterial occlusion sites were: 53% M1, 24% ICA, 16% M2, 4% Basilar and 2% other. Time to reperfusion (oTICI ≥ 2A) was median 30.0 (19.0, 42.0) min. Core lab adjudicated revascularization was mTICI ≥ 2B in 90.4% (95%CI 87.4, 92.9), oTICI ≥ 2B in 82.3% (95%CI 78.6, 85.6) and oTICI2C ≥ 2C in 45.0% (95%CI 40.5, 49.6). mRS of 0-2 at 90 days was achieved in 57.3% (95%CI 52.5, 62.1). Extensive clinical, laboratory and stroke workflow variables were considered, yet only male sex (OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.38, 0.99) was an independent predictor of successful reperfusion (oTICI ≥ 2B) while age (OR 0.96 (95% CI 0.94, 0.97), NIHSS (OR 0.91 (95% CI 0.88, 0.94) and diabetes (OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.33, 0.88) predicted mRS 0-2 at 90 days.

Conclusions: Proven reperfusion rates after endovascular stroke therapy excel in the real-world translation of thrombectomy devices around the globe, leading to good outcomes after stroke.

Abstract WP4: Transfer Patients and Patients Presenting Directly to Endovascular Capable Centers Achieve Similar Good Outcome Rates with Endovascular Therapy

Background: While endovascular therapy (EVT) is effective for large vessel occlusions (LVO), most patients present to hospitals without EVT capability and are transferred for intervention, delaying treatment.

Objective: We evaluated outcomes in LVO patients treated with thrombectomy who were transferred compared to those presenting directly to EVT facilities.

Methods: In a large multicenter international prospective cohort study of LVO patients treated with stent retriever thrombectomy (TREVO Registry), patients were stratified by initial presentation into transferred (TNS) vs direct (DIR). 90 day mRS was the primary outcome (0-1 excellent, 0-2 good outcomes); sICH and reperfusion by mTICI were secondary outcomes. Outcomes were compared in the 2 groups (0-8 hrs onset to groin puncture (GP) then in time matched 3-8 hrs subgroups for validation). Logistic regression identified independent predictors of good outcome in TNS patients.

Results: We identified 540 patients (230 TNS; 310 DIR) (Fig 1). TNS patients were younger and had longer onset to GP times (4.6 vs 3.1 hrs; p <0.001) (Table 1). DIR achieved higher excellent outcomes (50.4 vs 38.7%; p <0.001) (Table 2). There were no significant differences in good clinical outcomes (61 DIR vs 57.4% TNS, OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.63-1.27; p =0.4) (Fig 2) and no difference in the time matched 3-8 hrs subgroups (59.2% DIR vs 56.3% TNS, p =0.6). Fig 3 plots good outcome probabilities over time, showing similar confidence interval bands. Younger age (OR 0.95), lower NIHSS (OR 0.90), glucose level < 170 mg/dL (OR 2.4), distal clot location (M2) (OR 1.7), excellent reperfusion (mTICI≥2b) (OR 2) and time to GP <5 hrs (OR 1.6) were independent predictors of good outcome in TNS patients.

Conclusion: While excellent outcomes were higher in directly-presenting patients, EVT-treated transfers may achieve similar good outcomes. The association between earlier EVT after transfer and better outcomes emphasizes the need to streamline the transfer process.

Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stenting Without Distal Embolic Protection Devices

BACKGROUND

Embolic protection devices are used during carotid artery stenting procedures to reduce risk of distal embolization. Although this is a standard procedural recommendation, no studies have shown superiority of these devices over unprotected stenting procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the periprocedural outcome and durability of carotid artery stenting without embolic protection devices and poststent angioplasty.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 174 carotid angioplasty stent procedures performed at our institution. One hundred sixty-six patients underwent angioplasty and stenting without distal protection devices or poststent angioplasty. Complications related to stenting, including procedural complications, postoperative stroke and/or myocardial infarction, and stent restenosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five stents (78%) were performed in symptomatic patients, whereas 22% of stents were placed for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. The degree of stenosis was 80% or greater in 75% of patients and 90% or greater in 55% of patients. Following the stenting procedure, the 24-hour and 30-day rate of transient ischemic attack, intracranial hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke was 0. Three (2%) patients had a perioperative, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Five patients (2.8%) required treatment for restenosis (>50% stenosis from baseline), 1 of which was symptomatic.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that carotid artery stenting without the use of embolic protection devices and without postangioplasty stenting, in experienced hands, can be performed safely. Furthermore, this technique does not result in a higher degree of in-stent restenosis than series in which poststenting angioplasty is performed.

An Analysis of Transient Ischemic Attack Practices: Does Hospital Admission Improve Patient Outcomes?

INTRODUCTION

Immediate treatment has been shown to decrease the recurrence of cerebrovascular accidents following transient ischemic attacks (TIA), prompting the use of a specialized neurologic emergency department (Neuro ED) to triage patients. Despite these findings, there is little evidence supporting the notion that hospital admission improves post-TIA outcomes. Through the lens of a Neuro ED, this retrospective chart review of TIA patients examines whether hospital admission improves 90-day outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred sixty charts of patients discharged with TIA diagnosis were reviewed. These charts encompassed patients with TIA who presented to a main emergency department (ED) or Neuro ED from January 2014 to April 2015. Demographic information, admission ABCD(2) scores, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, and admission Modified Rankin Scale, and reason for any return visits within 90 days were collected.

RESULTS

This review shows that patients triaged by the Neuro ED were admitted at a lower rate than those seen by the standard ED. Further, patients triaged by the Neuro ED experienced lower readmission and recurrence of stroke or TIA within 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide preliminary support for the notion that discharging appropriate TIA patients, with adequate follow-up, will not adversely affect the recurrence of TIA or stroke within 90 days.

Changes in the prevalence of hospitalization and comorbidity in US adults with stroke: A three decade cross-sectional and birth cohort analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Little attention was paid to the transition of care for stroke that may partially explain the long-term trend of stroke rates. We aimed to test the trend of hospitalization attributable to stroke in US adults.

METHODS

Data from National Hospital Discharge Surveys 1980-2010 in patients aged ≥18 (n = 6,527,304) were analyzed to examine the trend of patients with first-list diagnoses of stroke. Stroke comorbidities were classified in stroke patients with second- to seven-listed diagnoses of coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, arrhythmias, or hyperlipidemia. Stroke trends by survey years and birth cohorts were analyzed using univariate, multivariate, and birth cohorts methods.

RESULTS

Of the total study sample, the prevalence of hospitalization due to stroke was 22.99%, 30.00%, and 27.03% in years of 1980-1989, 1990-1999, and 2000-2010 in males, and 17.30%, 22.04%, and 19.34% in females, respectively. Overall, hospitalization rates in stroke patients significantly increased among adults aged <65, and decreased in adults aged ≥65. There was an increase in stroke hospitalization rate in the old adults aged ≥65 in recent birth cohorts. Significant increased trends of comorbid hypertension, diabetes, arrhythmias, and hyperlipidemia were observed from 1980 to 2010.

CONCLUSION

A significant increase in stroke hospitalization rate was observed in adults aged <65 in the past three decades, and in old adults in recent years. Increases in stroke comorbidity rates were observed in all age groups. Findings from the study highlight that both public health and clinical practices face a serious challenge in controlling this unwelcome increased stroke trend.

The fate of cranial neuropathy after flow diversion for carotid aneurysms

OBJECT

The authors sought to determine whether flow diversion with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) can approximate microsurgical decompression in restoring function after cranial neuropathy following carotid artery aneurysms.

METHODS

This multiinstitutional retrospective study involved 45 patients treated with PED across the United States. All patients included presented between November 2009 and October 2013 with cranial neuropathy (cranial nerves [CNs] II, III, IV, and VI) due to intracranial aneurysm. Outcome analysis included clinical and procedural variables at the time of treatment as well as at the latest clinical and radiographic follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-six aneurysms (57.8%) were located in the cavernous segment, while 6 (13.3%) were in the clinoid segment, and 13 (28.9%) were in the ophthalmic segment of the internal carotid artery. The average aneurysm size was 18.6 mm (range 4–35 mm), and the average number of flow diverters placed per patient was 1.2. Thirty-eight patients had available information regarding duration of cranial neuropathy prior to treatment. Eleven patients (28.9%) were treated within 1 month of symptom onset, while 27 (71.1%) were treated after 1 month of symptoms. The overall rate of cranial neuropathy improvement for all patients was 66.7%. The CN deficits resolved in 19 patients (42.2%), improved in 11 (24.4%), were unchanged in 14 (31.1%), and worsened in 1 (2.2%). Overtime, the rate of cranial neuropathy improvement was 33.3% (15/45), 68.8% (22/32), and 81.0% (17/21) at less than 6, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At last follow-up, 60% of patients in the isolated CN II group had improvement, while in the CN III, IV, or VI group, 85.7% had improved. Moreover, 100% (11/11) of patients experienced improvement if they were treated within 1 month of symptom onset, whereas 44.4% (12/27) experienced improvement if they treated after 1 month of symptom onset; 70.4% (19/27) of those with partial deficits improved compared with 30% (3/10) of those with complete deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Cranial neuropathy caused by cerebral aneurysm responds similarly when the aneurysm is treated with the PED compared with open surgery and coil embolization. Lower morbidity and higher occlusion rates obtained with the PED may suggest it as treatment of choice for some of these lesions. Time to treatment is an important consideration regardless of treatment modality.

Clinical and Procedural Predictors of Outcomes From the Endovascular Treatment of Posterior Circulation Strokes

Background and Purpose—

Patients with posterior circulation strokes have been excluded from recent randomized endovascular stroke trials. We reviewed the recent multicenter experience with endovascular treatment of posterior circulation strokes to identify the clinical, radiographic, and procedural predictors of successful recanalization and good neurological outcomes.

Methods—

We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with posterior circulation strokes, who underwent thrombectomy with stent retrievers or primary aspiration thrombectomy (including A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique [ADAPT] approach). We correlated clinical and radiographic outcomes with demographic, clinical, and technical characteristics.

Results—

A total of 100 patients were included in the final analysis (mean age, 63.5±14.2 years; mean admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 19.2±8.2). Favorable clinical outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) was achieved in 35% of patients. Successful recanalization and shorter time from stroke onset to the start of the procedure were significant predictors of favorable clinical outcome at 90 days. Stent retriever and aspiration thrombectomy as primary treatment approaches showed comparable procedural and clinical outcomes. None of the baseline advanced imaging modalities (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomographic perfusion, or computed tomography angiography assessment of collaterals) showed superiority in selecting patients for thrombectomy.

Conclusions—

Time to the start of the procedure is an important predictor of clinical success after thrombectomy in patients with posterior circulation strokes. Both stent retriever and aspiration thrombectomy as primary treatment approaches are effective in achieving successful recanalization.

Abstract WMP8: Results of Trevo Acute Ischemic Stroke Thrombectomy Registry: Predictors of Clinical Outcome

Background and Purpose: Recent randomized clinical trial (RCTs) demonstrated efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy using stent-retrievers in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. The main purpose of TRevo ACute Ischemic StroKe (TRACK) stent-retriever thrombectomy multicenter registry is to demonstrate safety and efficacy in real life clinical practice.

Methods: The investigator-initiated TRACK multicenter registry recruited 24 sites in north America to submit demographic, clinical, site-adjudicated angiographic, and outcome data on consecutive AIS patients treated with Trevo stent-retriever device as the first treatment option. Standard clinical safety (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality) and efficacy (revascularization and disability) outcomes and predictors of clinical outcome were analyzed.

Results: 624 patients were enrolled in the TRACK registry. Median age was 68 years (range 16-94, 118 (18.1%) >80), male gender was 51.4%, and 67.7% were white. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity Scale (NIHSS) was 17 (IQR 13-22). Transfer cases were 50.6% with IV-rtPA use in 318 cases (51.3%). Median onset to groin puncture (OTG) time was 283 min (IQR 198.5-443), and groin puncture to revascularization was 66 min (IQR 37.5-103). Anterior circulation occlusion was 86.2% (MCA/M2 in 55.2% followed by ICA in 15.9% and M2 in 12.7%). Use of GA was in 389 cases (62.3%), number of passes were ≤ 3 in 92% of the cases (1: 45.2%, 2:28%, and 3:18.7%), 291 (46.7%) had BGC use. Rescue use was seen in 21.7%. Revascularization of ≥ TIMI 2 was 81.8% and ≥ TICI 2b was 70%. The primary outcome of mRS of ≥ 2 was 48.3% in the full cohort, and 50.6% in TREVO-2 like group. sICH and mortality were 7.2%, and 20.1% in the full cohort vs 6.9% and 17.5% in the TREVO-2 like group, respectively. The independent predictors of clinical outcome were lower baseline NIHSS, younger age, use of BGC, successful recanalization, and no general anesthesia (GA).

Conclusions: The real life clinical practice Trevo registry demonstrated good clinical outcome and high rate of recanalization. Younger age, lower baseline NIHSS, use of balloon guide catheter, successful recanalization, and avoiding endotrachaeal GA independent predictors of good clinical outcome.

Abstract WP31: Site Experience and Relation to Outcome in the TRevo ACute Ischemic StroKe Thrombectomy Registry: Higher Volumes Translate in Better Outcomes

Background and Purpose: It remains unclear how experience influences outcomes after the advent of stent-retriever technology. We studied the relationship between site experience and outcomes in the TRevo ACute Ischemic StroKe (TRACK) multicenter registry.

Methods: The 24 sites that enrolled patients in the TRACK registry were trichotomized into: low volume (enrolling 1-23 cases, less than 2 cases/ month), medium volume (24-47 cases, 2-4 cases/ month), and high volume sites (> 48 cases, > 4 cases/ month). Demographics, baseline features, and key prognostic presentation characteristics were compared across the three volume strata.

Results: The 624 TRACK registry patients were divided into three sub groups: low (n=188 patients, 30.1%), medium (n=175, 28.1%), and high (n=261, 41.8%) volume centers. There were no significant differences in terms of age (mean, 66±16 vs. 67±14 vs. 65±15, p=0.2), baseline NIHSS (mean, 17.6±6.5 vs. 16.8±6.5 vs. 17.6±6.9, p=0.43) or site of occlusion across the 3 groups. Times from stroke onset to groin puncture were shorter in the medium volume sites (310 min) but similar in the low vs. high volumes sites (397 vs. 378 min). Higher efficiency and better outcomes were seen in higher volumes sites as demonstrated by faster times from groin puncture to reperfusion (mean, 89 vs. 82 vs. 65 min, p<0.0001), lower general anesthesia usage (60% vs. 70% vs. 59%, p=0.06), higher balloon guide catheter use (40% vs. 36% vs. 59%, p=<0.0001), higher reperfusion rates (mTICI ≥2b, 75.8% vs. 79.4% vs. 83.9%, p=0.10), and higher rates of good outcome (90-day mRS≤2, 39% vs. 50% vs. 53.4%, p=0.02). There were no appreciable differences in sICH (4.5% vs. 9.8% vs. 7.3%, p=0.2) or 90-day mortality (20.3% vs. 25% vs. 17.1%, p=0.2). After adjustments in multivariate analysis, there were significantly higher chances of achieving good outcomes in high vs. low volume (OR: 1.7, 95%CI 1.04-2.75, p=0.035) and medium vs. low volume (OR: 1.8, 95%CI 1.1-2.9, p=0.03) centers but there were no significant differences between high and medium volume centers (p=0.84).

Conclusions: Clinical volumes have a significant influence in terms of efficiency and outcomes across stroke centers.

Endovascular treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis: Contemporary multicenter experience

Endovascular therapy of cerebral venous thrombosis using modern approaches to intracranial recanalization, such as stent retrievers and aspiration thrombectomy, is not well described. We performed a retrospective review of data for consecutive patients with venous sinus thrombosis who underwent endovascular treatment between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2013 at participating institutions. We identified a total of 13 patients with a diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis. The most frequently utilized type of endovascular intervention was the Penumbra aspiration system (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, California, USA) (nine cases), followed by local infusion of tissue plasminogen activator (bolus and/or drip in six cases) and stent retrievers (Solitaire FR (Covidien, Irvine, California, USA) in three cases and Trevo (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) in one case). Overall, multimodality treatment (two or more different types of devices or approaches) was performed in 62% of cases. Follow-up data were available for 11 patients; of those, five had a favorable clinical outcome (defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) and three patients died. Various endovascular approaches are utilized in current clinical practice. A multimodal approach to endovascular therapy for the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis resulted in partial or complete restoration of flow in all cases, yet the mortality rate of 27% indicates the need for improvement in recanalization strategies for this disorder.

Endovascular therapy of wake-up strokes in the modern era of stent retriever thrombectomy

Background

Endovascular treatment of wake-up strokes (WUS) has been previously described, mostly with the use of pharmacological thrombolysis or first generation thrombectomy devices.

Objective

To describe outcomes of WUS treated with modern endovascular therapy since the Food and Drug Administration approval of stent retrievers, and to identify predictors of good clinical outcome in this population of stroke patients.

Methods

We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with WUS who underwent thrombectomy with stent retrievers Trevo (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) and Solitaire FR (Covidien, Irvine, California, USA), or primary aspiration thrombectomy. We correlated favorable clinical outcomes with demographic, clinical, and technical characteristics.

Results

52 patients were included in this study; 46 (88%) cases were treated with stent retrievers and 6 (12%) were treated with primary aspiration thrombectomy alone. Successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b/3) was achieved in 36 (69%) patients. Favorable clinical outcome at 3 months, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2, was achieved in 25 (48%) patients. Duration of intervention <30 min and its success, defined as TICI 2b/3 recanalization, were strong predictors of favorable clinical outcome at 90 days (p<0.001 and p<0.0001, respectively).

Conclusions

Our study indicates that endovascular treatment of WUS with stent retrievers and aspiration thrombectomy is safe and effective.

The neurological emergency room and prehospital stroke alert: the whole is greater than the sum of its parts

BACKGROUND

Emergency medical services (EMS) prenotification to hospitals regarding the arrival of patients who have had a stroke is recommended to facilitate the workup once the patient arrives. Most hospitals have the patient enter the emergency department (ED) before obtaining a head computed tomography (CT) scan. At Capital Health, prehospital stroke-alert patients are delivered directly to CT and met by a neurological emergency team. The goal of bypassing the ED is to reduce the time to treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate (1) door-to-CT and door-to-needle time in patients with an acute stroke who arrive as prehospital stroke alerts and (2) the accuracy of EMS assessment.

METHODS

A prospective database of all prehospital stroke alert patients was kept and data retrospectively reviewed for patients who were seen between July 2012 and July 2013.

RESULTS

Between July 2012 and July 2013, 141 prehospital stroke alerts were called to our emergency department, and the patients were stable enough to bypass the ED and go directly to CT. EMS assessment of stroke was accurate 66% of the time, and the diagnosis was neurological 89% of the time. The average time between patient arrival and acquisition of CT imaging was 11.8 minutes. Twenty-six of the 141 patients (18%) received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. The median time from arrival to intravenous tissue plasminogen activator bolus was 44 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Trained EMS responders are able to correctly identify patients who are experiencing neurological/neurosurgical emergencies and deliver patients to our comprehensive stroke center in a timely fashion after prenotification. The prehospital stroke alert protocol bypasses the ED, allowing the patient to be met in CT by the neurological ED team, which has proven to decrease door-to-CT and door-to-needle times from our historical means.

ABBREVIATIONS

ASLS, Advanced Stroke Life SupportDTN, door-to-needleED, emergency departmentEMS, emergency medical servicesEMT, emergency medical technicianIV, intravenousMEND, Miami Emergency Neurological DeficitPHSA, prehospital stroke alerttPA, tissue plasminogen activator.

Utilization of Pipeline embolization device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: US multicenter experience

OBJECTIVE

Utilization of the Pipeline embolization device (PED) in complex ruptured aneurysms has not been well studied. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness data from five participating US centers.

METHODS

Records of patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms who underwent PED treatment between 2011 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

26 patients with ruptured aneurysms underwent PED treatment (mean age 51.4 ± 13.2 years;16 women). At presentation, 8 patients (30.8%) had a Hunt-Hess grade of IV or above; 11 required extraventricular drain placement. Aneurysm morphologies were: 8 dissecting, 8 blister-like, 6 fusiform, and 4 saccular. There were 22 anterior circulation and 4 posterior circulation aneurysms. PED deployment was successful in all patients, with adjunctive coiling utilized in 12. Periprocedural complications occurred in 5 (19.2%), including 3 inhospital deaths. 23 patients (88.5%) had postoperative angiography at a mean of 5.9 months: 18 aneurysms (78.3%) were completely occluded, 3 (13.0%) had residual neck filling, and 2 (8.7%) had residual dome filling. All blister-type aneurysms were completely occluded at follow-up. Clinical follow-up was available for an average of 10.1 months (range 2-21 months), with one asymptomatic in-stent stenosis and one asymptomatic thromboembolic stroke noted. Good outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2) was achieved in 20 patients (76.9%), fair (mRS 3-4) in 3 (11.5%), and 3 died (11.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The PED can be utilized for ruptured aneurysms and is a good option for blister-type aneurysms. However, due to periprocedural complications, it should be reserved for lesions that are difficult to treat by conventional clipping or coiling.

Recombinant factor VIIa use in patients presenting with intracranial hemorrhage

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) can be used for rapid INR normalization in life-threatening hemorrhage in anticoagulated patients. Dosing is unclear and may carry thromboembolic risks. We reviewed the use of rFVIIa at a comprehensive stroke and cerebrovascular center to evaluate dose effectiveness on INR reduction and thromboembolic complications experienced. The primary endpoint was to review the efficacy of rFVIIa in lowering INR. Secondary endpoints included doses used and adverse effects caused by rFVIIa administration. Forty-one percent of patients presented with a subdural hemorrhage. The mean INR prior to rFVIIa administration was 3.5 (0.9-15) and decreased to 1.13 (0.6-2). The mean dose of rFVIIa given was 73 mcg/kg (±24 mcg/kg). Two patients (3%) experienced a thromboembolic event. Recombinant factor VIIa appears to lower INR without significant thromboembolic complications.