Durvalumab ± tremelimumab + platinum-etoposide in first-line extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC): Updated results from the phase III CASPIAN study

9002

Background: CASPIAN is an open-label, Phase 3 study of durvalumab (D) ± tremelimumab (T) + etoposide and either cisplatin or carboplatin (EP) for pts with 1L ES-SCLC. At the planned interim analysis (data cutoff Mar 11, 2019; 63% maturity), D + EP demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS compared with EP alone (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.59–0.91]; p=0.0047). Here we present a planned updated analysis of OS for D + EP vs EP and the first results for D + T + EP vs EP. Methods: Treatment-naïve pts with ES-SCLC (WHO PS 0/1) were randomized 1:1:1 to D 1500 mg + EP q3w, D 1500 mg + T 75 mg + EP q3w, or EP q3w. In the IO arms, pts received 4 cycles of EP + D ± T, followed by maintenance D 1500 mg q4w until disease progression. Pts received one additional dose of T 75 mg post EP in the D + T + EP arm. In the EP arm, pts received up to 6 cycles of EP and optional PCI (investigator’s discretion). The two primary endpoints were OS for D + EP vs EP and for D + T + EP vs EP. Results: 268, 268 and 269 pts were randomized to D + EP, D + T + EP and EP, respectively; baseline characteristics were generally well balanced across arms. As of Jan 27, 2020, the median follow-up was 25.1 mo, 82% maturity. D + EP continued to demonstrate improvement in OS vs EP, with a HR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.62–0.91; nominal p=0.0032); median OS 12.9 vs 10.5 mo, respectively. 22.2% of pts were alive at 2 y with D + EP vs 14.4% of pts with EP. D + T + EP numerically improved OS vs EP, however this did not reach statistical significance per the prespecified statistical plan: HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.68–1.00; p=0.0451 [p≤0.0418 required for stat sig]); the median OS was 10.4 mo and 23.4% of pts were alive at 2 y. Secondary endpoints of PFS and ORR remained improved with D + EP vs EP and will be presented. Confirmed investigator-assessed ORR was similar for D + T + EP vs EP (58.4% vs 58.0%). Median PFS was similar for D + T + EP vs EP (4.9 mo vs 5.4 mo), but the 12-mo PFS rate was numerically higher (16.9% vs 5.3%); PFS HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.70–1.01). In the D + EP, D + T + EP and EP arms, respectively, incidences of all-cause AEs of Grade 3/4 were 62.3%, 70.3% and 62.8%; AEs leading to discontinuation 10.2%, 21.4% and 9.4%; and AEs leading to death 4.9%, 10.2% and 5.6%. Conclusions: The addition of durvalumab to EP continued to demonstrate improvement in OS compared with a robust control arm, further supporting this regimen as a new standard of care for 1L ES-SCLC offering the flexibility of platinum choice. No additional benefit was observed when T was combined with D + EP in this pt population. Safety findings in all arms remained consistent with the known safety profiles of all agents. Clinical trial information: NCT03043872.

First-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide in extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC (CASPIAN): Impact of brain metastases on treatment patterns and outcomes

9068

Background: In the Phase 3, randomized, open-label CASPIAN study, first-line durvalumab (D) added to etoposide plus either cisplatin or carboplatin (EP) significantly improved OS vs EP alone (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.59–0.91]; p = 0.0047) in pts with ES-SCLC at the planned interim analysis. Here we describe treatment patterns and outcomes for pts according to brain metastases. Methods: Treatment-naïve pts (WHO PS 0/1) with ES-SCLC received 4 cycles of D 1500 mg + EP q3w followed by maintenance D 1500 mg q4w until disease progression (PD) or up to 6 cycles of EP q3w and optional prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI; investigator’s discretion). Pts with either asymptomatic or treated and stable brain metastases were eligible. Brain imaging was suggested for pts with suspected brain metastases, but was not mandated at screening or during treatment. The primary endpoint was OS. Analysis of OS and PFS in pt subgroups with and without brain metastases was prespecified. Other analyses in these subgroups were post hoc. Data cutoff: Mar 11, 2019. Results: At baseline, 28 (10.4%) of 268 pts in the D + EP arm and 27 (10.0%) of 269 pts in the EP arm had known brain metastases; of these, only 3 pts (~11% of those with baseline brain metastases) in each arm received radiotherapy (RT) to the brain prior to study entry. D + EP consistently improved OS vs EP in pts with or without known brain metastases at baseline (HR 0.69 [95% CI 0.35–1.31] and 0.74 [0.59–0.93], respectively); PFS was also consistently improved with D + EP regardless of the presence or not of baseline brain metastases (HR 0.73 [0.42–1.29] and 0.78 [0.64–0.95]). Among pts without known brain metastases at baseline, similar proportions developed new brain metastases at first PD in the D + EP (20/240; 8.3%) and EP arms (23/242; 9.5%), despite 19 (7.9%) pts in the EP arm having received PCI. Overall, 48 of 268 (17.9%) and 49 of 269 (18.2%) pts in the D + EP and EP arms received RT to the brain subsequent to study treatment; rates remained similar across the D + EP and EP arms regardless of baseline brain metastases (11 of 28 [39.3%] and 11 of 27 [40.7%] pts with known baseline brain metastases, compared to 37 of 240 [15.4%] and 38 of 242 [15.7%] pts without known baseline brain metastases). Conclusions: In CASPIAN, OS and PFS outcomes were improved with D + EP vs EP regardless of baseline brain metastases, consistent with the ITT analyses. Rates of new brain metastases at first PD were similar between arms, although PCI was permitted only in the control arm. Rates of subsequent RT to the brain were also similar in both arms. Clinical trial information: NCT03043872.

Successful Re-administration of Osimertinib in Osimertinib-induced Interstitial Lung Disease with an Organizing Pneumonia Pattern: A Case Report and Literature Review

Osimertinib is the standard therapy for epidermal-growth-factor-receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers. We herein report a case of osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease (OsiILD) with an organizing pneumonia (OP) pattern and provide a literature-based review. Six months after osimertinib administration, a 75-year-old woman with right pleural carcinomatosis developed ILD with an OP pattern. After salvage chemotherapy, osimertinib with corticosteroid was successfully re-administered. A literature review suggested that 1) OsiILD with an OP pattern was rare but should be recognized, and 2) re-administration of osimertinib in OsiILD was successful in select patients. A criterion that determines whether a patient would benefit from re-administration is warranted.

Influence of age on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a paradigm shift in the development of cancer treatment. However, it remains to be clarified whether the benefits that they confer differ according to patient age. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess age differences in the benefits of ICI treatment.Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed database for randomised controlled trials of ICIs, including PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors across multiple cancer types, such as melanoma, lung cancer and gastric cancer. We extracted trials including hazard ratios (HRs) for death stratified by patient age (cut-off age, 65 years). The primary objective of this study was to assess the difference in ICI efficacy between younger and older patients. We calculated pooled HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for younger and older cancer patients, and assessed data heterogeneity.Results: We identified 3999 studies in our search. Of these, 24 eligible randomised trials, including a total of 8157 (57%) younger and 6104 (43%) older cancer patients, fulfilled the criteria for our study and were thus further analysed. The pooled HRs of the younger and older patients were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86), respectively; the difference in ICI efficacy between younger and older cancer patients was not significant (p = .82). Regarding the PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, the survival benefit was similar in both age groups (HR: 0.74; p = .96), whereas for the CTLA-4 inhibitors, there tended to be less survival benefit for older versus younger patients (HR: 0.90 and 0.77, respectively; p = .26).Conclusions: The survival benefit conferred by ICI was not age-dependent, amongst patients aged 65 years or younger. However, age-dependent benefits may vary amongst different types of ICIs.

The effect and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated long survival for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the effect and safety of ICI rechallenge have not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ICI rechallenge in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We defined 'rechallenge' as re-administration of ICIs for patients who were previously treated with ICIs and discontinued treatment for any reason, and received subsequent chemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed the histories of 434 patients with advanced NSCLC who received ICIs from December 2015 to December 2017 at seven centers.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients discontinued the ICI treatment, and 14 patients (4.4%) received ICI rechallenge. All 14 patients discontinued the first ICI due to disease progression. Eight patients received the same kind of ICIs, and six patients received different ICIs. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-2.6] and 6.5 months [95% CI: 1.4-19.0], respectively. The objective response rate was 7.1%, and the disease control rate was 21.4%. Two of three patients who achieved at least a stable disease, received radiotherapy between the first and second ICIs. Adverse events were not significantly different compared with the first ICIs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the effect of ICI rechallenge was limited. Careful consideration of the administration of ICI rechallenge is necessary. This report involved a small number of cases, so further large prospective studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy of ICI rechallenge and to investigate predictive markers to identify a patient population in which ICI rechallenge is effective.

Nivolumab for the treatment of unresectable pleural mesothelioma

Introduction: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the current first-line standard therapy for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Recently, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been intensively investigated as treatment options for this disease. Nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 agent, was one of the first drugs used and is representative of available ICIs.Areas covered: This review discusses previous relevant reports and current ongoing trials of nivolumab. The efficacy and safety of nivolumab have been investigated mostly in second-line or later treatment settings as both monotherapy and in combination with other ICIs. Particularly, nivolumab monotherapy yielded promising efficacy with an objective response rate of 29% and median overall survival of 17.3 months in salvage settings in the single-arm, Japanese phase 2 trial (MERIT). Notably, the study led to Japanese approval of nivolumab for unresectable recurrent MPM. Several trials with monotherapy or cotherapy with nivolumab have commenced, including randomized trials of nivolumab monotherapy vs. placebo in the salvage setting, and cotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab vs. the platinum doublet in the frontline setting.Expert opinion: Nivolumab seems like a reasonable option for unresectable, relapsed MPM despite the lack of randomized trial data. Ongoing pivotal trials will confirm its efficacy.

Pilot evaluation of a HER2 testing in non-small-cell lung cancer

AIMS

HER2-positivity pattern in the specimens of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) has been hardly reported in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We evaluated the characteristics of HER2-positivity pattern in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples using IHC and FISH in 15 patients enrolled in a larger prospective cohort study to survey a HER2-positive NSCLC.

RESULTS

As for the immunostaining pattern, most specimens (79%) demonstrated incomplete or mixed-typed membranous immunoreactivity with heterogeneity, resembling that observed in gastric cancer rather than breast cancer. Concordance between IHC-positivity and FISH-positivity was 87.5% according to the criteria for breast cancer scoring system. On application of the gastric cancer scoring system to the examined tumours, the IHC score increased in the seven (43.8%) specimens, and the concordance between IHC positivity and FISH positivity rose to 93.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our pilot series, the pattern of IHC reactivity closely resembled that observed in gastric cancer rather than breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

000017003.

Final progression-free survival results from the J-ALEX study of alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The J-ALEX study compared the efficacy and safety of alectinib with crizotinib in Japanese patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Superiority in independent review facility (IRF)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was demonstrated for alectinib at the second pre-planned interim PFS analysis (data cutoff: December 3, 2015; hazard ratio [HR] 0.34, 99.7 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.71, P < 0.0001). We report final PFS data and the second pre-planned interim analysis of overall survival (OS) and safety (data cutoff: June 30, 2018).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥20 years who were ALK inhibitor-naïve and chemotherapy-naïve, or had received one prior chemotherapy regimen, were randomized to receive alectinib 300 mg (n = 103) or crizotinib 250 mg (n = 104) twice daily. The primary end point was IRF-assessed PFS. Secondary end points included OS and safety. All patients entered survival follow-up in July 2018.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 42.4 months for alectinib and 42.2 months for crizotinib. Sustained improvement in IRF-assessed PFS with alectinib was shown (HR 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.26-0.52; median PFS 34.1 months vs 10.2 months crizotinib). At the second interim OS analysis, superiority of alectinib to crizotinib could not be concluded (stratified HR 0.80, 99.8799 % CI: 0.35-1.82, stratified log-rank P = 0.3860; median OS not reached alectinib vs 43.7 months crizotinib). Fewer alectinib-treated patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (36.9 % vs 60.6 % crizotinib).

CONCLUSIONS

At the final PFS analysis, alectinib continued to demonstrate superiority in IRF-assessed PFS versus crizotinib in ALK-inhibitor-naïve ALK-positive NSCLC, with a favorable safety profile. OS follow-up continues.

Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have extensive-stage disease at presentation, and prognosis remains poor. Recently, immunotherapy has demonstrated clinical activity in extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). The CASPIAN trial assessed durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, in combination with etoposide plus either cisplatin or carboplatin (platinum-etoposide) in treatment-naive patients with ES-SCLC.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial was done at 209 sites across 23 countries. Eligible patients were adults with untreated ES-SCLC, with WHO performance status 0 or 1 and measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1:1 ratio) to durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide; durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum-etoposide; or platinum-etoposide alone. All drugs were administered intravenously. Platinum-etoposide consisted of etoposide 80-100 mg/m² on days 1-3 of each cycle with investigator's choice of either carboplatin area under the curve 5-6 mg/mL per min or cisplatin 75-80 mg/m² (administered on day 1 of each cycle). Patients received up to four cycles of platinum-etoposide plus durvalumab 1500 mg with or without tremelimumab 75 mg every 3 weeks followed by maintenance durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks in the immunotherapy groups and up to six cycles of platinum-etoposide every 3 weeks plus prophylactic cranial irradiation (investigator's discretion) in the platinum-etoposide group. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. We report results for the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group versus the platinum-etoposide group from a planned interim analysis. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned study treatment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Patients were enrolled between March 27, 2017, and May 29, 2018. 268 patients were allocated to the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group and 269 to the platinum-etoposide group. Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival, with a hazard ratio of 0·73 (95% CI 0·59-0·91; p=0·0047]); median overall survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 11·5-14·8) in the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group versus 10·3 months (9·3-11·2) in the platinum-etoposide group, with 34% (26·9-41·0) versus 25% (18·4-31·6) of patients alive at 18 months. Any-cause adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 163 (62%) of 265 treated patients in the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group and 166 (62%) of 266 in the platinum-etoposide group; adverse events leading to death occurred in 13 (5%) and 15 (6%) patients.

INTERPRETATION

First-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide significantly improved overall survival in patients with ES-SCLC versus a clinically relevant control group. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profiles of all drugs received.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

A Long-term Response to Nivolumab in a Case of PD-L1-negative Lung Adenocarcinoma with an EGFR Mutation and Surrounding PD-L1-positive Tumor-associated Macrophages

Anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies have poor efficacy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancer. We herein report a 72-year-old man with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-negative lung adenocarcinoma harboring an EGFR mutation that responded to nivolumab for more than 2 years. A pathological examination revealed infiltration of CD8-positive lymphocytes and macrophages expressing CD68, CD206, and PD-L1 into the PD-L1-negative tumor; CD206 expression is a marker of immunosuppressive tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). The presence of PD-L1-positive TAMs in the tumor environment might be a predictor of a positive response to anti-PD-1 antibodies.

P1650Clinical significance of uNGAL, uKIM-1, and uL-FABP in patients with acute pulmonary edema

Introduction

Novel urinary biomarkers such as urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (u-NGAL),urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (u-KIM-1), and urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (uL-FABP) are proposed to be reliable markers for acute heart failure (AHF). Acute pulmonary edema (APE) is one of the vascular phenotypes of AHF, such as `vascular failure”, often with high blood pressure at admission. We aimed to investigate the differences in the clinical impact and prognostic utility of urinary biomarkers in AHF patients with and without APE.

Methods and results

This prospective observational study included 203 AHF patients (mean age: 77 years, 52% male). uL-FABP, u-NGAL, and u-KIM-1 were measured at admission and before discharge, with correction for urinary creatinine. APE was defined as acute-onset dyspnea and radiographic alveolar edema requiring non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and AHF rehospitalization for 1 year. The median uL-FABP levels at admission were higher in APE (n=42) than in non-APE patients (n=161; 10.8 [4.5–23.7] vs. 20.7 [5.9–63.5] μg/gCr, p=0.017), whereas u-KIM-1, u-NGAL, and serum creatinine did not significantly differ between AHF patients with and without APE. The primary outcome did not differ between patients with and without APE. However, among patients with APE, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that higher uL-FABP (≥median: 20.7 μg/gCr) was associated with adverse events (log-rank: p=0.019). After adjusting for age, sex, serum creatinine, and brain natriuretic peptide, multivariable Cox hazard analysis showed that higher uL-FABP is an independent predictor of adverse events (HR: 4.0 [1.2–18.2], p=0.023).

Conclusion

Unlike u-NGAL and u-KIM-1, uL-FABP was higher in APE patients than in non-APE patients. Further, among patients with APE, higher uL-FABP was predictive for poor prognosis.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

EGFR-TKI acquired resistance in lung cancers harboring EGFR mutations in immunocompetent C57BL/6J mice

OBJECTIVES

Lung cancers harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations inevitably develop resistance to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Therefore, we sought to establish clinically relevant lung-cancer mouse models to achieve deep remission of cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We previously established two transgenic lung-cancer mouse models harboring human EGFR exon 21 L858R substitution (hLR) and mouse Egfr exon 19 deletion (mDEL) in the C57BL/6 J background. Lung tumors from these two transgenic mouse strains were transplanted subcutaneously into BALB/c-nunu mice or C57BL/6 J mice.

RESULTS

The transplanted tumors developed the ability to grow on the subcutaneous tissue, peritoneum, or lung of C57BL/6 J mice. While hLR tumors could grow only in C57BL/6 J mice carrying the transgene, mDEL tumors could grow in wild-type C57BL/6 J mice. The tumors maintained EGFR-dependency, and, thus, the EGFR-TKI gefitinib inhibited tumor growth; however, similar to human lung cancers, hLR and mDEL tumors acquired resistance in 60 and 200 days, respectively, following gefitinib administration. Secondary EGFR T790 M mutation in hLR tumors and secondary Egfr T792I mutation in mDEL tumors developed; however, no MET activation was detected. Accordingly, the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib effectively inhibited gefitinib-resistant tumors in vivo. Furthermore, gefitinib-resistant tumors developed resistance to osimertinib in 100 days.

CONCLUSION

These syngeneic lung-cancer mouse models harboring EGFR mutations are suitable for studying the drug-resistance mechanisms and the role of the tumor microenvironment. Further investigation with these mouse models is warranted for developing next-generation treatment strategies for lung cancer.

Successful Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Accurate Diagnosis by Immunohistochemistry

Urothelial carcinoma usually presents with hematuria, but cases of multiple lymphadenopathy with elevated S-pancreas-1 antigen (SPan-1) levels have not been reported. A 62-year-old Japanese man with lymphadenopathies was diagnosed with an adenocarcinoma of unknown origin and transferred to our hospital for further diagnosis. Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and SPan-1 levels were extremely elevated. Uroplakin III immunostaining was positive in the inguinal lymph node, and cystoscopy revealed the presence of invasive urothelial carcinoma. Treatment with cisplatin and gemcitabine promoted a complete metabolic response for > 4 years. The detection of uroplakin III and serum SPan-1 might help diagnose urothelial carcinoma.

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and efficacy of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in lung cancer: A sub-analysis of data from the two Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group prospective feasibility studies

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the mainstay treatment for advanced lung cancer; however, it remains controversial whether the efficacy of chemotherapy can be modulated by the immune-checkpoint status. In this study, we investigated the relationship between programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status and the efficacy of cisplatin-based chemotherapy by using individual patient data and pathological specimens obtained during our two previously performed prospective studies on the feasibility of short-term low-volume hydration in patients with advanced lung cancer who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Among 91 patients who participated in the two aforementioned trials, those with assessable tumor specimens were included in this sub-analysis. PD-L1 expression levels were determined using immunohistochemical staining, while the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, were used for determining treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were investigated. PD-L1 expression was observed in 8 patients (25.0%; the PD-L1-positive group), with 2 exhibiting a PD-L1 expression of 50% or more. None of the patients in the PD-L1-positive group responded to treatment, while the overall response rate in the PD-L1-negative group was 20.8% (5 of 24; P = 0.296). Both the progression-free survival and overall survival rates were worse in the PD-L1-positive group than in the PD-L1-negative group (3.7 vs. 5.9 months [P = 0.018] and 5.8 vs. 37.3 months [P = 0.070], respectively).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression was negatively correlated with survival in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Beneficial Effect of Osimertinib Readministration in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Harboring an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation with a History of Acquired Resistance to Osimertinib

We herein report a case of the beneficial effect of osimertinib readministration in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. A 69-year-old non-smoking woman was diagnosed with advanced NSCLC harboring an EGFR exon19 deletion and T790M. She was treated with osimertinib for two years but eventually acquired resistance. After 1.5 years of salvage chemotherapies, osimertinib was re-administered. She has been effectively and safely treated with osimertinib readministration for over 10 months. A prospective study is warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib readministration in NSCLC with EGFR mutations.

Final PFS analysis and safety data from the phase III J-ALEX study of alectinib (ALC) vs. crizotinib (CRZ) in ALK-inhibitor naïve ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC)

9092

Background: The primary analysis of the J-ALEX (JapicCTI-132316) study for the ALK-inhibitor naïve ALK+ NSCLC demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) of ALC compared with CRZ (HR 0.34, 99.7% CI 0.17–0.71, stratified log-rank p < 0·0001) by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) (data cutoff, December 3 2015, Hida et al., Lancet 2017) . Here, we report the final PFS and OS 2nd interim data (data cutoff, June 30 2018). Methods: ALK+ NSCLC (by IHC and FISH or RT-PCR) patients were randomized 1:1 either to receive ALC (300 mg BID, n = 103) or CRZ (250 mg BID, n = 104). Stratification factors included ECOG PS, treatment line, and clinical stage. Primary endpoint was PFS according to the blinded IRF. Secondary endpoints included OS, objective response rate, and safety. Results: After a median follow-up of 42.2 months in the ALC arm and 42.4 months in the CRZ arm, an event of disease progression or death occurred in 54% and 86% in the ALC arm and the CRZ arm, respectively. The final PFS HR was 0.37 (95%CI 0.26-0.52): median IRF-PFS was 34.1 months (95%CI 22.1– not estimated) in the ALC arm and 10.2 months (95%CI 8.3–12.0) in the CRZ arm. HRs for the time to CNS progression or death was 0.33 (95%CI 0.11–0.93) and 0.20 (95%CI 0.08–0.49) with or without CNS metastases at baseline, respectively. The 2nd interim analysis of OS was still immature (events 30.1% in the ALC arm, 31.7% in the CRZ arm; stratified HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.35–1.82). Most of patients (77.9%) in the CRZ arm received ALC as a subsequent therapy whereas only 10.7% of patients in the ALC arm received CRZ. Proportion of patients with grade 3–4 AEs (37% vs 61%), AEs leading to interruption (40% vs 82%) or discontinuation (12% vs 23%) were lower in the ALC arm than the CRZ arm. There were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. Conclusions: In the final PFS analysis, ALC continued to demonstrate the superiority in IRF-PFS in ALK-inhibitor naïve ALK+ NSCLC regardless of baseline CNS metastases with a favorable safety profile. The updated result of OS will be presented in the future congress. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-132316.

Randomized phase II study comparing mannitol with furosemide for the prevention of cisplatin-induced renal toxicity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: The OLCSG1406 trial

e23105

Background: Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the mainstay in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is still controversial as to whether furosemide (FUR) or mannitol (MAN) is better as a forced diuresis for avoiding cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. We conducted a randomized phase II trial to clarify this issue in candidates. Methods: Those with advanced NSCLC, suitable for receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy with an adequate renal function were randomly assigned either to the FUR arm or the MAN arm. Either of forced diuretics was administered with an appropriate hydration in cisplatin administration. The primary endpoint of the study was a proportion of ≥ grade 1 serum Creatinine (Cr) elevation in the first cycle, defined by the CTCAE v4.0. Results: The trial was terminated early with 44 (FUR arm; 22 and MAN arm; 22) of the planned 66 patients because of slow accrual. The patient demographics are listed in Table1. In the first cycle, 2 (9%) and 4 patients (18%) developed grade 1 Cr elevation, respectively (P = 0.33), despite no ≥ grade 2 toxicity. The median time to develop the worst Cr score was 29 (range: 26-31) and 12 (range: 8-28) days, respectively. All patients recovered within 3 to 330 days, respectively. Cisplatin induced grade 3 emesis was observed in 3 patients (14%) in MAN arm, whilst none developed in FUR arm. No treatment related deaths were observed. Conclusions: In this setting, the preventive effect of the two types of forced diuretics on cisplatin-induced renal toxicity was not significantly different. Clinical trial information: UMIN000015293. [Table: see text]