Angiotensin-receptor blockade versus converting-enzyme inhibition in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy

Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular diseases include hypertension, coronary heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, sudden death, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke. The high risk of cardiovascular disease in individuals with diabetes was recognized more than 30 years ago. Appreciation of the multiple risk factors and complex pathophysiologic process responsible for cardiovascular disease in individuals with both type 1 and 2 diabetes is critical for the prevention, early detection, and management of cardiovascular disease in this population. The focus of this article is on the acute and chronic manifestations of coronary heart disease.

Dual Blockade of the Renin-Angiotensin System in the Progression of Renal Disease: The Need for More Clinical Trials

There is clear evidence that pharmacologic blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) reduces proteinuria and slows the progression of renal disease in diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies, a beneficial effect that is not related to BP control. Some patients exhibit a significant beneficial response, whereas others do not. The absence of response may be explained by the incomplete blockade of the RAS obtained with ACEI. In the search of new alternatives that could improve the antiproteinuric and nephroprotective effects of RAS blockers, the association of ACEI and ARB might prove useful. ARB produces a complete blockade of the RAS. Several studies have shown a more marked antiproteinuric effect of the dual blockade of the RAS versus ACEI or ARB alone. A recent study also demonstrated that this more marked antiproteinuric effect is associated with less progression of renal disease in primary nondiabetic nephropathies despite a similar effect on BP. Until now, there has not been any reference to a beneficial effect on progression of the dual blockade in type 2 diabetic nephropathy, which is the most frequent cause of ESRD. A multicenter, prospective, open, active-controlled, and parallel-group trial was designed to compare the effects of an ACE inhibitor versus an ARB or its combination on renal disease progression, proteinuria, and cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic nephropathy.

Urinary albumin excretion in patients with diabetes after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Many studies support microalbuminuria screening as the cornerstone of early detection of nephropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), but there are no studies that address its utility in the follow-up of renal transplant recipients with DM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 104 subjects with DM who had undergone renal transplantation. Sixty three had a history of preexisting DM and 41 developed posttransplant diabetes (PTDM). We collected data on random urine albumin/creatinine (A/C) ratio, systolic blood pressure (SBP), serum creatinine concentration (Cr), and HBA1C.

RESULTS

Mean subject age was 58 +/- 9.8 years; 63% received cadaveric grafts while 37% received living donor grafts. Mean follow-up was 7 years (range 1.6 to 15.6). Seventy percentage developed proteinuria over time; of these 62% developed microalbuminuria (A/C ratio 30 to 300 microg albumin/mg creatinine) and 38% developed macroalbuminuria (A/C ratio >300 microg/mg). Subjects with preexisting DM were as likely to develop an elevated A/C ratio as those with PTDM. Higher A/C ratios correlated with higher SBP (P < .01), with higher HBA1C (P < .036), and with higher Cr (P < .01). Lower A/C ratios correlated with more stable Cr over time (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Strict SBP and glycemic control are associated with a significantly lower A/C ratio in patients with DM after renal transplantation. Annual monitoring of A/C ratio in patients with DM after renal transplantation can identify candidates for stricter glycemic and blood pressure control, similar to current recommendations for all other patients with DM.

Effective treatment of hypertension by AT(1) receptor antagonism: the past and future of telmisartan

Lowering blood pressure is the most effective treatment method to ensure a reduction in the total risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in volume homeostasis and blood pressure regulation and is a target for several groups of pharmaceutical agents. Angiotensin II receptor blockers represent the newest class of antihypertensive compounds. They prevent the binding of angiotensin II to the subtype 1 receptor (AT(1)), which is believed to mediate most of the physiological actions relevant to the regulation of blood pressure. Telmisartan, a widely used AT(1) receptor antagonist, is a highly selective compound with high potency, a long duration of action and a tolerability profile similar to placebo. Numerous randomized clinical trials and community-based studies have demonstrated that oral telmisartan and combinations of telmisartan with hydrochlorothiazide are at least as effective in lowering blood pressure as all other hypertensive medications. This has been demonstrated in different populations of adult patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, including patients with coexisting Type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome or renal impairment. Several large-scale, long-term, clinical endpoint studies are in progress to assess the beneficial effects of telmisartan on hypertension-related end-organ damage in patients at high risk of renal, cardiac and vascular damage whose blood pressure is well controlled. The most recent data from clinical trials and latest research regarding telmisartan will be reviewed in this article.

Intrarenal oxidative stress and augmented angiotensinogen are precedent to renal injury in Zucker diabetic fatty rats

The Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rat is a model of type II diabetes and metabolic syndrome based on impaired glucose tolerance caused by the inherited insulin-resistance gene. The ZDF rat exhibits progressive nephropathy; however, the detailed mechanisms have remained unclear. This study was performed to examine the possible involvement of enhanced intrarenal angiotensinogen in the development of renal injury in ZDF rats. Genetic pairs of male ZDF rats and control lean rats (N=6 each) were maintained from 12 to 17 weeks of age. At 17 weeks of age, fasting blood glucose and urinary 8-isoprostane levels were significantly higher in ZDF rats compared with the controls. Systolic blood pressure progressively increased in ZDF rats from 120+/-1 to 137+/-1 mmHg during this period. In contrast, systolic blood pressure did not increase in the controls. Kidney angiotensinogen protein levels were significantly increased in ZDF rats compared with the controls (1.83+/-0.34 vs. 1.00+/-0.17, relative ratio). Expression of angiotensin II type 1a receptor mRNA was similar between these groups. The measured indices of renal damage in the present study (glomerular sclerosis, interstitial expansion, glomerular macrophage infiltration, and renal arterial proliferation) were not significantly increased at this stage in ZDF rats. However, we previously showed that the increased reactive oxygen species-related angiotensinogen enhancement plays an important role in the development of renal injury in a genetic salt-sensitive hypertension. Thus, the present data suggest that elevated reactive oxygen species and reactive oxygen species-associated augmentation of intrarenal angiotensinogen may initiate the development of renal injury in ZDF rats.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists for preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIRA) are considered to be equally effective for patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), but renal and not mortality outcomes have usually been considered.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms ACEi and AIIRA in patients with DKD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (1966 to December 2005), EMBASE (1980 to December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library issue 4 2005) and contacted known investigators.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies comparing ACEi or AIIRA with placebo or each other in patients with DKD were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity among studies was explored using the Cochran Q statistic and the I(2) test, subgroup analyses and random effects metaregression.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty studies (13,215 patients) were identified. Thirty eight compared ACEi with placebo, five compared AIIRA with placebo and seven compared ACEi and AIIRA directly. There was no significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality for ACEi versus placebo (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.17) and AIIRA versus placebo (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.17). A subgroup analysis of studies using full-dose ACEi versus studies using half or less than half the maximum tolerable dose of ACEi showed a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality with the use of full-dose ACEi (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.98). Baseline mortality rates were similar in the ACEi and AIIRA studies. The effects of ACEi and AIIRA on renal outcomes (ESKD, doubling of creatinine, prevention of progression of micro- to macroalbuminuria, remission of micro- to normoalbuminuria) were similarly beneficial. Reliable estimates of effect of ACEi versus AIIRA could not be obtained from the three studies in which they were compared directly because of their small sample size.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although the survival benefits of ACEi are known for patients with DKD, the relative effects on survival of ACEi with AIIRA are unknown due to the lack of adequate direct comparison studies. In placebo controlled studies, only ACEi (at the maximum tolerable dose, but not lower so-called renal doses) were found to significantly reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. Renal and toxicity profiles of these two classes of agents were not significantly different.

Improving outcomes in renal disease

CKD is a silent medical problem that requires laboratory analysis to make an early diagnosis. Early aggressive management of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia are vital. Awareness and management of the frequent complications also improve ESRD outcomes. Ongoing consultation with the nephrology team, including a renal dietitian, is important for delaying disease progression and improving patient quality of life.

Efficacy of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Cardiovascular Disease

The cardiovascular continuum describes the progression of pathophysiologic events from cardiovascular risk factors to symptomatic cardiovascular disease (CVD) and life-threatening events. Pharmacologic intervention early in the continuum may prevent or slow CVD development and improve quality of life. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is central to the pathophysiology of CVD at many stages of the continuum. Numerous clinical trials of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have shown that RAAS blockade provides benefits to patients across the continuum. ARBs are as effective as ACE inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension; however tolerability and adherence to therapy appear to be improved with ARBs. Large clinical trials have shown that ARBs may provide therapeutic benefits beyond blood pressure control in patients with diabetes, heart failure or at risk of heart failure following a myocardial infarction. In addition, ARBs have been shown to provide protective effects in patients with impaired renal function or left ventricular hypertrophy. Additional clinical trials are ongoing to further characterize the role of ARBs in CVD management.

Dual blockade of angiotensin II with enalapril and losartan reduces proteinuria in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes

In this study we evaluated the effect of a dual blockade with enalapril and losartan on the reduction of overt macroproteinuria and its potential mechanism(s) in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Twenty-six hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes at the baseline were administered 5 mg of enalapril once daily for 12 weeks. At the beginning of the study, the subjects were assigned to receive an add-on of 50 mg of losartan once daily or 5 mg of enalapril once daily for another 12 weeks. Blood samples were collected at the baseline, at the beginning, and at the end of the study for the measurement of laboratory parameters, and these data, including blood pressure, were compared between the two groups. Treatment with 5 mg of enalapril significantly decreased the systolic blood pressure level in both groups, and the addition of losartan and/or enalapril further decreased the levels. There was no difference in blood pressure between the two groups. However, the addition of losartan, but not enalapril, significantly decreased the urinary protein excretion level, plasma aldosterone, and hypersensitive-C-reactive protein at the end of the study. The results established that the dual blockade of angiotensin II with enalapril and losartan has a greater clinical benefit for high-risk patients with hypertension and advanced diabetic nephropathy.

Evidence for renoprotection by blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertension and diabetes

The incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is rising worldwide, accompanied by corresponding increases in the risk of morbidity and mortality. Underlying this trend are increasing rates of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, the two most common causes of ESRD. In addition to the adverse haemodynamic effects of hypertension on the kidney, elevated blood pressure (BP) can activate components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), which, in turn, activate mediators of inflammation, oxidative stress, cell growth, and matrix accumulation. Lowering BP reduces the risk of cardiovascular events and renal damage. Accumulating evidence from clinical and laboratory studies suggests that interrupting the RAAS with therapies such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and aldosterone receptor blockers can interfere with the mechanisms that promote diabetic and non-diabetic renal damage. Moreover, clinical trials of RAAS blockade have demonstrated reductions in microalbuminuria, a predictor of increased cardiorenal risk and overt nephropathy in patients with and without diabetes and/or hypertension. In this way, agents that block the RAAS should be considered the drugs of first choice as they provide enhanced renoprotection compared with other classes of antihypertensive agents such as calcium channel blockers and beta-blockers.

Endothelial dysfunction: how can one intervene at the beginning of the cardiovascular continuum?

Endothelial dysfunction, characterized by impaired nitric oxide activity, constitutes an early step in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic disease. Prospective studies have shown that impaired endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation and the vasodilatory response of coronary arteries to acetylcholine predict cardiovascular events. Microalbuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate, which are both deeply influenced by renal nitric oxide activity, are predictors of cardiovascular outcome and total mortality but develop at a later stage of renal impairment. Endothelial dysfunction reflects early stage renal involvement in the atherosclerotic processes. The Telmisartan versus Ramipril in renal ENdothelium DYsfunction (TRENDY) trial examined endothelial function of the renal vasculature as a therapeutic target in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes, but without albuminuria. The rationale was that blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is cardio- and renoprotective at later stages of the disease, but the impact of blockade of the RAS at earlier stages of disease is unknown. The results of TRENDY indicate that the endothelial function, as assessed by basal nitric oxide activity, can be improved after RAS blockade. These data complement the results of the Diabetics Exposed to Telmisartan And enalaprIL (DETAIL) trial, which demonstrated that telmisartan and enalapril similarly decelerate the progression of overt diabetic nephropathy. The results of TRENDY are in accordance with the observed changes in peripheral circulation. Endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation could be improved with angiotensin II receptor blockers, but not with diuretics or beta-blockers, in hypertensive patients. Intervention at the beginning of the renal and cardiovascular continuum offers the opportunity to prevent the fatal development towards renal and cardiac failure.

Managing diabetic nephropathy: recent studies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent studies designed to identify improved treatments for diabetic nephropathy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data support the concept that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers have similar renoprotective effects. Aggressive blockade of the renin-angiotensin system appears to have benefits beyond those achieved with conventional doses of single agents. Dual blockade using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers is effective. Aldosterone receptor antagonists may potentiate the effect of these two classes of compounds. It remains unclear, however, whether maximum benefit can be obtained by the combination of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers or aldosterone receptor antagonists as compared to larger doses of single agents. Not enough data are available currently to recommend thiazolidinedione hypoglycemic agents for renal protection. Trials are being conducted with several new classes of agents.

SUMMARY

Evidence from short-term studies favors aggressive blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Long-term studies, however, remain to be performed. A multifactorial approach that incorporates established interventions affords our best means to retard the progression of diabetic nephropathy.

Managing hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE

Current guideline recommendations for effective strategies to optimize the treatment of patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Current estimates indicate that 20 million people in the United States have diabetes, 90-95% of whom have type 2 diabetes mellitus. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of premature death from cardiovascular disease (CVD), stroke, and end-stage renal disease. Hypertension is an extremely common comorbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The coexistence of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes is particularly destructive because of the strong linkage of the two conditions with CVD, stroke, progression of renal disease, and diabetic nephropathy. Current guidelines, including those issued by the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, the National Kidney Foundation, and the American Diabetes Association, provide evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, studies indicate that guidelines are not widely followed. Therefore, the beneficial effects of appropriate hypertension treatment observed in clinical trials are often not recognized in clinical practice. Pharmacists are ideally positioned to help improve guideline implementation and patient outcome.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists must become more vigilant about following current guidelines for the treatment of patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Strategies such as patient education and medication assessment can help to optimize care for these patients and slow the progression to diabetic nephropathy.

Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension

Telmisartan blocks the detrimental actions of angiotensin II mediated via the angiotensin type 1 receptor. Unique features of telmisartan are high lipophilicity and a long terminal elimination half-life (~ 24 h). Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide is indicated for hypertensive patients unable to achieve target blood pressure with either monotherapy. Fixed-dose combination tablets containing telmisartan 40 or 80 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg are widely available; in addition, telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 80/25 mg is available in the USA. Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide is superior to losartan/hydrochlorothiazide and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in maintaining blood pressure control in the risky early morning hours at the end of the dosing interval. Furthermore, telmisartan/ hydrochlorothiazide provides superior 24-h mean blood pressure reduction and is better tolerated than amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with predominantly systolic hypertension. Telmisartan has the potential to confer additional reno- and cardioprotection to that due to blood pressure control. The cardioprotective activity of renin–angiotensin system blockade with telmisartan alone and in combination with ramipril is currently being evaluated in the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) and the Telmisartan Randomized AssessmeNt Study in aCE iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND). In total, 31,546 patients have been enrolled worldwide and are being followed for up to 5.5 years.

Therapeutic potential of angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system plays a key role in the regulation of fluid and electrolyte balance. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibit angiotensin II type 1 receptors and large clinical trials have shown that they are effective in many cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, heart failure, myocardial infarction and diabetic nephropathy. They lower blood pressure effectively, are very well tolerated and can be used as monotherapy or in combination with other drug classes for the treatment of hypertension. ARBs are particularly suitable for hypertensive patients with co-morbidities such as diabetes, microalbuminuria, proteinuria, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure. Unlike angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ARBs do not cause persistent dry cough. For patients in whom angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are indicated but not tolerated, an ARB should be considered. Periodic monitoring of renal function and electrolytes is required in patients treated with an ARB.

Simvastatin maintains steady patterns of GFR and improves AER and expression of slit diaphragm proteins in type II diabetes

The factors determining the course of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and albumin excretion rate (AER) and the expression of mRNA of slit diaphragm (SD) and podocyte proteins in microalbuminuric, hypertensive type II diabetic patients are not fully understood. GFR, AER, and SD protein mRNA were studied in 86 microalbuminuric, hypertensive, type II diabetics at baseline and after 4-year random double-blind treatment either with 40 mg simvastatin (Group 1) or with 30 g cholestyramine (Group 2) per day. Both groups had at baseline a GFR decay per year in the previous 2-4 years of 3 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Both Groups 1 and 2 showed a significant decrease of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels after simvastatin and cholestyramine treatment (P<0.01). No change from base line values was observed as for hs-C-reactive protein and interleukin-6. A significant decrease of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine urinary excretion was observed after simvastatin treatment. GFR did not change from baseline with simvstatin, whereas a decrease was observed with cholestyramine treatment (simvastatin vs cholestyramine: -0.21 vs -2.75 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P<0.01). AER decreased in Group 1 (P<0.01), but not in Group 2 patients. Real-time polymerase chain reaction measurement of mRNA SD proteins (CD2AP, FAT, Actn 4, NPHS1, and NPHS2) significantly increased in kidney biopsy specimens after simvastatin, but not cholestyramine treatment. Simvastatin, but not cholestyramine, 4-year treatment maintains steady patterns of GFR, and improves AER and expression of SD proteins in type II diabetes, despite similar hypocholesterolemic effects in circulation.

Que nous apprennent les grands essais cliniques de prévention cardiovasculaire et rénale chez le malade diabétique de type 2 hypertendu ?

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension are frequently associated. Cardiovascular morbidity is a major burden in these patients. Furthermore a renal disease appears in 40% of them that may lead to chronic terminal renal failure. Whatever the stage of the renal disease, it increases the cardiovascular risk. A majority of type 2 diabetic patients will eventually died of cardiovascular complications before having reached chronic terminal renal failure. Many large clinical trials including type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension have been performed in the last 20 years with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as primary outcomes. These trials mainly evaluated the role of glycemic control, of hypertension as well as the decrease of LDL-cholesterol. Based on these trials, the prescription type of hypertensive type 2 diabetic patient should include, besides hygienic and dietary advices, antidiabetic treatment, thiazide and/or betablocker and platelet inhibitor. Statin should be prescribed for secondary prevention if serum LDL-cholesterol is above 1,3 g/l and for primary prevention depending on serum LDL-cholesterol and on the number of cardiovascular risk factors. The objectives are an HbA1c below 6,5%, a LDL-cholesterol below 1g/l and a blood pressure below 150/80 mmHg. The appearance of diabetic nephropathy alters the treatment and the therapeutic objectives. Many large trials aimed at preventing microalbuminuria (primary prevention), macroproteinuria (secondary prevention), and chronic renal failure (tertiary prevention) have been conducted. For primary prevention, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors should be prescribed in case of hypertension because they delay the appearance of microalbuminuria. For secondary prevention, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers decrease albuminuria excretion rate and delay the appearance of macroproteinuria whatever the blood pressure. Tertiary prevention is based on angiotensin-receptor blockers since they slow down the decrease of renal function. The objectives are a blood pressure below 130/80 mmHg and the regression or the reduction of albuminuria excretion rate. Intensified and target-driven interventions aimed at multiple risk factors implicated in cardiovascular and renal lesions, as successfully performed in the STENO-2 study, reduce the risk of cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. In this article, large clinical trials having the prevention of cardiovascular and renal risks as primary outcomes were analyzed.

Intratubular Renin-Angiotensin System in Hypertension

It is well recognized that the renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in the regulation of arterial pressure and sodium homeostasis. Recent years, many studies have shown that local tissue angiotensin II levels are differentially regulated and cannot be explained on the basis of circulating concentrations. All of the components needed for angiotensin II generation are present within the various compartments in the kidney including the renal interstitium and the tubular network. The cascade of the renin-angiotensin system demonstrates three major possible sites for the pharmacological interruption of the renin-angiotensin system: the interaction of renin with its substrate, angiotensinogen, the angiotensin converting enzyme, and angiotensin II type 1 receptors. This brief article will focus on the role of the intratubular renin-angiotensin system in the pathophysiology of hypertension and the responses to the renin-angiotensin system blockade by renin inhibitors, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers.

Prevention of loss of renal function over time in patients with diabetic nephropathy

Management of hypertension is the mainstay of prevention and treatment of diabetic renal disease; evidence suggests that tight blood pressure control slows renal disease progression in established diabetic nephropathy. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has renoprotective effects over and above those achieved by lowering systemic blood pressure. To date, however, no long-term study using hard end points has directly compared current mechanisms for RAAS inhibition, angiotensin II receptor blockade (ARB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. This issue was addressed in the recently published Diabetics Exposed to Telmisartan and Enalapril (DETAIL) study, a head-to-head comparison of telmisartan and enalapril in 250 patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus and early-stage nephropathy. After 5 years' treatment, change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), the primary efficacy end point, was equivalent in the 2 treatment groups, as were all secondary end points. The expected steep decline in GFR in the first year was followed by a lesser decrease in the second year and then almost complete stabilization of renal function at > or =3 years. Over 5 years, no patient went into end-stage renal disease or required dialysis. There were also no increases in albumin excretion rate, nor was there an increase in creatinine beyond 200 mumol/L. Incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was extremely low in both treatment groups, a remarkable outcome given that almost 50% of patients had evidence of cardiovascular disease at randomization. Inhibition of the RAAS should play a major part in management of patients with type 2 diabetes with nephropathy, for which both telmisartan and enalapril provide long-term renoprotection.

Emerging drugs for diabetic nephropathy

There is an increasing number of patients with diabetes mellitus in many countries. Diabetic kidney disease, one of its microvascular complications, is also increasing markedly and has become a major cause of end stage renal disease worldwide. Intervention for preventing and delaying the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease is not only a medical concern, but also a social issue. Despite extensive efforts, however, medical interventions thus far are not effective enough to prevent the progression of the disease and the development of end stage renal disease. This justifies attempts to develop novel therapeutic approaches for diabetic nephropathy. Recent insights on its pathogenesis and progression have suggested new targets for the specific treatment of this disease. They include aldosterone, aldose reductase, arachidonic acid metabolites, growth factors, advanced glycosylation end-products, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and endothelin. Several other biochemical mediators have been targeted in experimental animal models with the goal to prevent diabetic nephropathy progression, but translation to clinics of these experimental achievements are still limited or lacking.

Microalbuminúria: fator de risco cardiovascular e renal subestimado na prática clínica

Embora de fácil determinação, a medida da excreção de albumina na urina tem sido pouco utilizada na identificação de indivíduos com diabetes tipo 2 (DM2), de maior risco para o desenvolvimento de doença renal e cardiovascular (CV). Tem sido demonstrado que as medidas das concentrações de albumina e creatinina (Cr) em amostras isoladas de urina, permitindo o cálculo da relação entre elas, podem ser suficientes para o rastreamento e mesmo para a avaliação da eficácia de medidas adotadas para a redução da microalbuminúria. Valores >30 mg/g de Cr ou 3,4 mg/mmol de Cr são indicativos de microalbuminúria e, em pacientes com DM2, a associação freqüente com a elevação dos níveis da pressão arterial representa condição de alto risco CV. Evidências epidemiológicas indicam que a presença de microalbuminúria prediz maior morbidade e mortalidade CV independente de outros fatores de risco. Por outro lado, a microalbuminúria mostra-se também freqüentemente associada a outros fatores de risco CV, sendo um dos componentes da síndrome metabólica. A capacidade de reduzir a pressão arterial, a pressão intraglomerular e a permeabilidade da membrana glomerular, fatores determinantes da progressão da lesão renal, explica o efeito renoprotetor dos inibidores da enzima conversora da angiotensina (IECAs) e dos bloqueadores dos receptores da angiotensina II (BRAs). No tratamento da nefropatia diabética, o uso de IECAs e BRAs associado ao controle rígido da pressão arterial, que deve ser mantida em níveis iguais ou inferiores a 130/80 mmHg, tem se mostrado como estratégia não só para promover proteção renal como também para promover proteção CV.

Hypertension treatment and implications of recent cardiovascular outcome trials

Clinical trials have shown that effective control of blood pressure reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. For example, data from the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) study show significant reductions in the incidence of cardiac events, stroke and all-cause mortality in patients in whom blood pressure control was achieved compared with those in whom blood pressure remained uncontrolled. Although the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) demonstrated no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity between patients receiving diuretics, calcium channel blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, this finding might have been confounded by differences in the blood pressure reductions achieved with the three treatments. Other studies have consistently shown that newer antihypertensive agents, such as ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers, reduce cardiovascular events to a similar, or possibly greater, extent as older therapies, such as diuretics and beta-blockers. In particular, ACE inhibitors appear to offer additional benefits beyond blood pressure reduction in terms of reducing cardiovascular events and producing renoprotective effects. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been less extensively studied, but there is evidence already that they have heart failure, stroke and renoprotective benefits. The ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) is currently comparing the effects of the ARB telmisartan 80 mg and the ACE inhibitor ramipril 10 mg, alone and in combination, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.

A randomized, masked, cross-over trial of lisinopril for inflammatory macular edema

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor lisinopril on inflammatory cystoid macular edema and visual acuity.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial.

METHODS

setting: Outpatient clinic of the Department of Ophthalmology at the University Medical Center of Utrecht. patients: Forty patients with inflammatory cystoid macular edema were included. intervention: Each patient received lisinopril (10 mg daily) or placebo for three months. After two months of a lisinopril/placebo free wash-out period, the groups received the reverse study medication for three months. Fluorescein angiography was performed to evaluate the retina. main outcome measures: Cystoid macular edema, best-corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.

RESULTS

Lisinopril had no effect on cystoid macular edema, visual acuity, papillary leakage, retinal vasculitis, and choroidal leakage. In a subgroup analysis, we observed a decrease in blood pressure (lisinopril, 14 of 36 patients; placebo, 5 of 36 patients; P = .02) and a decrease in morning urinary albumin excretion (lisinopril, 23 of 35 patients; placebo 10 of 34 patients, P = .003) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although lisinopril had no effect on inflammatory cystoid macular edema and visual acuity, we found a positive effect on the vascular system.

Cross-talk between angiotensin II and glucagon receptor signaling mediates phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK 1/2 in rat glomerular mesangial cells

We have recently shown that the pancreatic hormone glucagon-induced phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase ERK 1/2 as well as growth and proliferation of rat glomerular mesangial cells (MCs) via activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA)- and phospholipase C (PLC)/Ca2+-mediated signaling pathways. Since circulating glucagon and tissue angiotensin II (Ang II) levels are inappropriately elevated in type 2 diabetes, we tested the hypothesis that glucagon induces phosphorylation of ERK 1/2 in MCs by interacting with Ang II receptor signaling. Stimulation of MCs by glucagon (10 nM) induced a marked increase in intracellular [Ca2+]i that was abolished by [Des-His1, Glu9]-glucagon (1 microM), a selective glucagon receptor antagonist. Both glucagon and Ang II-induced ERK 1/2 phosphorylation (glucagon: 214+/-14%; Ang II: 174+/-16%; p<0.001 versus control), and these responses were inhibited by the AT1 receptor blocker losartan (glucagon + losartan: 77+/-14%; Ang II + losartan: 84+/-18%; p<0.01 versus glucagon or Ang II) and the AT2 receptor blocker PD 123319 (glucagon + PD: 78+/-7%; Ang II + PD: 87+/-7%; p<0.01 versus glucagon or Ang II). Inhibition of cAMP-dependent PKA with H89 (1 microM) or PLC with U73122 (1 microM) also markedly attenuated the phosphorylation of ERK 1/2 induced by glucagon (glucagon + U73122: 109+/-15%; glucagon + H89: 113+/-16%; p<0.01 versus glucagon) or Ang II (Ang II + U73122: 111+/-13%; Ang II + H89: 86+/-10%; p<0.01 versus Ang II). Wortmannin (1 microM), a selective PI 3-kinase inhibitor, also blocked glucagon- or Ang II-induced ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. These results suggest that AT1 receptor-activated cAMP-dependent PKA, PLC and PI 3-kinase signaling is involved in glucagon-induced MAP kinase ERK 1/2 phosphorylation in MCs. The inhibitory effect of PD 123319 on glucagon-induced ERK 1/2 phosphorylation further suggests that AT2 receptors also play a similar role in this response.

Meta-analysis of large outcome trials of angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), also known as sartans, block the activation of angiotensin type 1 receptors and have a recognised role in the treatment of heart failure and nephropathy. Since 2002, there have been three major outcome trials of ARBs in hypertension. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of ARB on major outcomes. Randomised controlled trials of ARBs in hypertensive subjects with an average follow-up of at least 2 years and at least 100 major cardiovascular events were included. For each trial, the ARB used, number and characteristics of subjects, baseline and change in blood pressure, cardiovascular and noncardiovascular outcomes were recorded. Three trials involving 29 375 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. In Losartan Intervention For Endpoint (LIFE) and Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) but not in Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation trial (VALUE), an ARB reduced the occurrence of the primary end point and stroke compared to control. Compared to other antihypertensive drugs, ARB treatment was associated with no significant change in all-cause mortality (relative risk ratio (RRR) 0.96, 95% CI: 0.88-1.06, P = 0.45). There was an increase in myocardial infarction (RRR, 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.26, P = 0.041), but a decrease in new-onset diabetes mellitus (RRR, 0.80, 95% CI: 0.74-0.86, P < 0.0000001). In conclusion, the reduction in new-onset diabetes partly offsets any increase in the risk of myocardial infarction. Most hypertensive patients require more than one class of drugs. Small differences in treatment outcome should not over-ride the importance of good blood pressure control.

Fewer Mega-Trials and More Clinically Oriented Studies in Hypertension Research? The Case of Blocking the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System

In recent years, medical practice has been influenced substantially by several factors, including the overwhelming development of evidence-based medicine, which is a consequence of the impressive, growing number of large clinical trials, the so-called "mega-trials." These clinical studies are designed mostly to investigate the effects of drugs or treatments on hard end points that cannot be tested by individual physicians in their daily clinical practice. The growing role of this epidemiologic approach to medicine, which is based mostly on the assessment of the average response or behavior of large populations rather than of individuals, is systematically replacing the former knowledge and reference points of the physician, as a substitute rather than as an aid. Taking into account the case of hypertension and particularly the renin-angiotensin system-blocking agents, this article reviews the issues and limitations of transferring evidence from mega-trials to clinical practice and suggests new strategies to make trials more effective and transferable to the case of individual patients.

[Last developments on hypertension]

The following article reviews some of the most recent data that have come to light in the field of hypertension during the last year, including the long lasting controversy USA/Europe on the definition and treatment of hypertension, the importance of the interrelationship hypertension/sleep apnea syndrome, to conclude by discussing some of the most compelling implications of the main trials that have been published during the last few months.

The role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the progression of chronic kidney disease

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a well known regulator of blood pressure (BP) and determinant of target-organ damage. It controls fluid and electrolyte balance through coordinated effects on the heart, blood vessels, and Kidneys. Angiotensin II (AII) is the main effector of the RAAS and exerts its vasoconstrictor effect predominantly on the postglomerular arterioles, thereby increasing the glomerular hydraulic pressure and the ultrafiltration of plasma proteins, effects that may contribute to the onset and progression of chronic renal damage. AII may also directly contribute to accelerate renal damage by sustaining cell growth, inflammation, and fibrosis. Interventions that inhibit the activity of the RAAS are renoprotective and may slow or even halt the progression of chronic nephropathies. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists can be used in combination to maximize RAAS inhibition and more effectively reduce proteinuria and GFR decline in diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease. Recent evidence suggests that add-on therapy with an aldosterone antagonist may further increase renoprotection, but may also enhance the risk hyperkalemia. Maximized RAAS inhibition, combined with intensified blood pressure control (and metabolic control in diabetics) and amelioration of dyslipidemia in a multimodal approach including lifestyle modifications (Remission Clinic), may achieve remission of proteinuria and renal function stabilization in a substantial proportion of patients with proteinuric renal disease. Ongoing studies will tell whether novel drugs inhibiting the RAAS, such as the renin inhibitors or the vasopeptidase inhibitors, may offer additional benefits to those who do not respond, or only partially respond, to this multimodal regimen.

Therapeutic measures in proteinuric nephropathy

The level of proteinuria is one of the most important risk factors for progressive renal function loss in renal diseases. Any therapeutic measure that reduces proteinuria will slow or halt the progression of proteinuric nephropathies. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or AT1-receptor antagonists (ARA) is currently the most powerful available antiproteinuric treatment. Recent investigations point out that blockade of RAAS at other levels (e.g., aldosterone or renin antagonists) could also induce a significant decrease in proteinuria. Because angiotensin II is also generated from angiotensin I by enzymes other than ACE, ARA would provide a more effective blockade of angiotensin II; however, ACE inhibition increases plasma levels of substances such as bradykinin and N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline, which have strong antifibrotic properties. These differential effects of ACE inhibitors and ARA are the rationale for combined administration of both agents, which in clinical studies has demonstrated a significantly higher antiproteinuric and renoprotective effect than by either drug alone. Salt and protein restriction, as well as cautious use of diuretics, can also increase the antiproteinuric effect of RAAS blockade. Treatment with statins or other lipid-lowering agents leads to reduction in proteinuria levels, as some meta-analyses have demonstrated. Smoking is associated with an increased risk for the appearance of proteinuria, so cessation of smoking should be mandatory in proteinuric renal diseases. Recent studies have highlighted an epidemic increase of obesity-related proteinuric glomerulopathies; weight loss is effective not only in this condition, but also in overweight patients with proteinuric nephropathies of other etiologies.

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: a key therapeutic strategy to reduce renal and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes

Diabetes (particularly type 2 diabetes) represents a global health problem of epidemic proportions. Individuals with diabetes are not only more likely to develop hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity, but are also at a significantly higher risk for coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke. Angiotensin II plays a key pathophysiological role in the progression of diabetic renal disease, and blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II antagonists has therefore become an important therapeutic strategy to reduce renal and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. Several studies have demonstrated the effects of angiotensin II antagonists on the reduction of albuminuria and the progression of renal disease from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria. More importantly, several endpoint trials have shown that the antiproteinuric effects of losartan and irbesartan translate into cardiovascular and renoprotective benefits beyond blood pressure lowering, thereby delaying the need for dialysis or kidney transplantation by several years. These and other studies indicate that angiotensin II antagonists not only improve survival and quality of life of patients with diabetic nephropathy, but also have the potential to reduce the substantial healthcare burden associated with managing these patients. ACEi also appear to exert similar beneficial effects in diabetic patients, but whether clinically significant differences in renoprotection or mortality exist between angiotensin II antagonists and ACEi in patients with type 2 diabetes remains to be fully investigated in appropriate head-to-head studies.

Does albuminuria predict cardiovascular outcomes on treatment with losartan versus atenolol in patients with diabetes, hypertension, and left ventricular hypertrophy? The LIFE study

OBJECTIVE

Our current aims were to investigate whether 1) baseline urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) predicted cardiovascular outcomes, 2) changes in UACR differed between treatments, 3) benefits of losartan were related to its influence on UACR, and 4) reduction in albuminuria reduced cardiovascular events.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In 1,063 patients with diabetes, hypertension, and left ventricular hypertrophy, UACR was measured for a mean of 4.7 years. The primary composite end point included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Cox models were run including and excluding baseline and time-varying UACR.

RESULTS

Increasing baseline albuminuria related to increased risk for cardiovascular events. Reductions in UACR at years 1 and 2 were approximately 33% for losartan vs. 15% for atenolol (P < 0.001). Benefits of losartan seem to be most prominent in patients with the highest level of baseline UACR, although treatment by albuminuria interaction was only significant for total mortality. Approximately one-fifth of the superiority of losartan was explained by the greater reduction of albuminuria. Risk of the primary end point was related to the in-treatment UACR.

CONCLUSIONS

Lowering of albuminuria in patients with hypertension and diabetes appears to be beneficial and should be the subject of additional study in future clinical trials.

Interaction of haemodynamic and metabolic pathways in the genesis of diabetic nephropathy

Clinical diabetic nephropathy is characterized by an earlier functional phase in which hyperglycaemia is accompanied by an increased glomerular filtration rate and microalbuminuria; the persistence of this high-flow and high-pressure state, added to a poor control of hyperglycaemia, fosters renal damage and proteinuria, accompanied by a decline in glomerular filtration rate and progression to end-stage renal disease. In this review, we present glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) as a novel link that connects the glomerular hyperfiltration (hypertension) state and the complex cascade of events that leads to nephropathy. The interplay between angiotensin II and nitric oxide, and its interactions with reactive oxygen species, are also discussed, in an attempt to provide an integrated view of the pathophysiology of diabetic nephropathy.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers for prevention and treatment of nephropathy associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Renal complications resulting from type 2 diabetes mellitus are costly and common. Finding optimal therapy is important for the prevention and management of diabetic nephropathy. Research has focused on antihypertensive agents that modify the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Because of their effects on the glomerulus, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been studied as interventions at various stages of diabetic nephropathy. The ACE inhibitors may delay the progression to microalbuminuria and then clinical albuminuria. The ARBs decrease albuminuria in patients with microalbuminuria and decrease adverse renal events, specifically the progression to end-stage renal disease in patients with clinical albuminuria and hypertension. Limited data suggest that combination therapy with ACE inhibitors and ARBs may slow the progression of microalbuminuria to clinical albuminuria. Because of the variability in degree of albuminuria evaluated and in study designs (numbers of patients, study duration, drug dosages, and outcomes measured), a detailed review of the available literature about ACE inhibitors and ARBs in the prevention or treatment of diabetic nephropathy may provide insight to clinicians.

Preventing microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes: rationale and design of the Randomised Olmesartan and Diabetes Microalbuminuria Prevention (ROADMAP) study

Diabetic nephropathy has developed into a worldwide epidemic and is responsible for the majority of end-stage renal disease in most countries. Antihypertensive treatment slows the progression of the disease. In addition, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system reduces the degree of albuminuria and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been shown to delay the progression from microalbuminuria to overt proteinuria in patients with diabetes. However, few studies have examined whether the initial stage of diabetic nephropathy (i.e. the development of microalbuminuria) in patients with type 2 diabetes can be slowed or prevented by ARB treatment. The Randomised Olmesartan And Diabetes MicroAlbuminuria Prevention (ROADMAP) study is a placebo-controlled, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group study investigating the effect of the ARB, olmesartan medoxomil, on the incidence of microalbuminuria. A total of 4400 type 2 diabetes patients with normoalbuminuria will be randomized to treatment with 40 mg of olmesartan medoxomil once daily or placebo. Goal blood pressure will be 130/80 mmHg. The primary endpoint of the study is the occurrence of microalbuminuria. In ROADMAP, we will also assess as secondary endpoints the effects of olmesartan on fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. In addition, within subgroups of the ROADMAP patients, the effects of olmesartan on retinopathy and other microvascular circulations will be analysed. The study is expected to last a median of 5 years. The ROADMAP study will answer the question whether an ARB can prevent or delay the onset of microalbuminuria and whether this translates into protection against cardiovascular events and renal disease.

Mechanisms of progression and regression of renal lesions of chronic nephropathies and diabetes

The incidence of chronic kidney diseases is increasing worldwide, and these conditions are emerging as a major public health problem. While genetic factors contribute to susceptibility and progression of renal disease, proteinuria has been claimed as an independent predictor of outcome. Reduction of urinary protein levels by various medications and a low-protein diet limits renal function decline in individuals with nondiabetic and diabetic nephropathies to the point that remission of the disease and regression of renal lesions have been observed in experimental animals and even in humans. In animal models, regression of glomerular structural changes is associated with remodeling of the glomerular architecture. Instrumental to this discovery were 3D reconstruction studies of the glomerular capillary tuft, which allowed the quantification of sclerosis volume reduction and capillary regeneration upon treatment. Regeneration of capillary segments might result from the contribution of resident cells, but progenitor cells of renal or extrarenal origin may also have a role. This review describes recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms and mediators underlying renal tissue repair ultimately responsible for regression of renal injury.

Beneficial effect of lisinopril plus telmisartan in patients with type 2 diabetes, microalbuminuria and hypertension

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have favourable effects on hypertension and diabetic nephropathy, but persistent use may result in incomplete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Long-term effects of dual blockade using the ACE inhibitor lisinopril and the long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) telmisartan on blood pressure and albumin excretion rate (AER) were evaluated. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] >or=140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] >or=90 mmHg) and microalbuminuria (AER 30-300 mg/24h) received 20mg of lisinopril or 80 mg of telmisartan once a day for 24 weeks. Patients were then randomised to continuing treatment with the respective monotherapy or with lisinopril plus telmisartan for a further 28 weeks. Significant (P<0.001) declines in SBP (11.1 mmHg versus 10.0 mmHg), DBP (5.6 mmHg versus 5.3 mmHg) and AER (98 mg/24 h versus 80 mg/24 h) were achieved with lisinopril (n=95) or telmisartan (n=97), respectively, after 24 weeks. Subsequent treatment with lisinopril plus telmisartan for 28 weeks resulted in further significant reductions (P<0.001) in SBP, DBP and AER compared with either monotherapy. All treatments were well tolerated. Lisinopril plus telmisartan thus provides superior blood pressure and AER control than either monotherapy. We conclude that use of dual blockade may provide a new approach to prevention of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and microalbuminuria.

Improving Antihypertensive Therapy in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy

Nearly all patients with diabetic nephropathy have comorbid hypertension, which greatly elevates the risk for cardiovascular events. As patients are surviving longer, their risk of progressing to end-stage renal disease is increasing, particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes. Prevention of cardiovascular and renal events in this population requires diligent efforts to control blood pressure, serum glucose, and serum lipids. Improving antihypertensive therapy in patients with diabetic nephropathy relies on the following unified strategies: reducing blood pressure to <130/80 mm Hg, prescribing an agent that blocks the renin-angiotensin system, and designing an antihypertensive regimen that both reduces albuminuria and provides cardiovascular protection. A majority of patients will require three or more antihypertensive agents to achieve these objectives. Appropriate antihypertensive therapy in patients with diabetic nephropathy delays progression of renal disease and leads to substantial cost savings.

The renin-angiotensin system and its blockade in diabetic renal and cardiovascular disease

Diabetic nephropathy, the most common cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States, is also associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a central role in the development and progression of kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. Randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated renoprotection with the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in type 2 and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in type 1 diabetes. More recent studies have demonstrated similar cardiovascular benefits with the use of ARBs compared with ACEIs. The combination of the two classes of RAAS blockers has been investigated in large studies of patients with heart failure and after myocardial infarction, and a few small studies of patients with diabetic nephropathy. In this review, we summarized the results of the studies on the benefits of ARBs, ACEIs, and their combination in patients with diabetic nephropathy or cardiovascular diseases.

Antihypertensive, antiproteinuric therapy and myocardial infarction and stroke prevention

Proteinuria is a graded marker for kidney damage, as well as the risk for future cardiovascular events. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce urinary protein excretion and slow progression of renal impairment, independent of blood pressure lowering. Both the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and the Reduction in Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study were large, randomized, prospective studies in type 2 diabetic patients with proteinuria. There was no reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction or stroke with the ARBs compared to placebo in either trial. A broader overview of clinical trials comparing ACEIs and ARBs with other antihypertensive drugs fails to show any substantive blood pressure-independent effects on stroke or myocardial infarction with these classes of drugs. Therefore, for cardiovascular end points (as opposed to renal end points), it may be more important that the blood pressure is reduced, rather than how the process is started.

Angiotensin II-receptor antagonist in the treatment of hypertension

Effective treatment of high blood pressure levels represents a crucial point in reducing global cardiovascular risk, and several studies have clearly demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality with a more intensive blood pressure-lowering treatment. Other factors beyond blood pressure control may be important in reducing the risk related to hypertension. Pharmacologic agents blocking the renin-angiotensin system, in particular the angiotensin II-receptor blocker (ARB), a novel class of antihypertensive agents, represent an important addition to the therapeutic options for hypertension management, and recent large, international, randomized, trials have demonstrated that ARBs have clinical benefits across the spectrum of disease severity. In this article, we provide some evidence derived from these trials, supporting a role for ARBs in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal disease, beyond blood pressure control.

RAS inhibition in hypertension

Drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), namely angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARA) are gaining increasing popularity as initial medications for the management of hypertensive patients. In the year 2002, ACE-I were the most commonly prescribed drugs for the treatment of hypertension in USA. Although their antihypertensive efficacy as monotherapy is similar to other antihypertensive agents, they have the advantage of better tolerability, limited side effects and a favorable metabolic profile. When compared to other antihypertensive agents (diuretics, beta-adrenergic blockers and calcium antagonists) in large clinical trials, ACE-I and ARA provided no additional advantages regarding improvement in cardiovascular and total mortality. With the exception of the superiority of ARA in prevention of stroke, RAS inhibitors have no advantage over other agents in prevention of other cardiovascular morbid events, namely, heart failure (though ACE-I are superior to calcium antagonists), coronary heart disease and total cardiovascular events. However, there is the possibility that these agents have other benefits beyond blood pressure lowering. At equal degrees of blood pressure reduction, RAS inhibitors prevent or delay the development of diabetes mellitus and provide better end-organ protection, kidneys, blood vessels and the heart when compared with other antihypertensive agents. The combined use of ACE-I and ARA is particularly useful in organ protection. RAS inhibitors are specifically indicated in the treatment of hypertension in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function, diabetes, proteinuria, impaired kidney function, myocardial infarction, multiple cardiovascular risk factors and possibly elderly patients. The main limitation of the ACE-I is cough and rarely angioedema. Elderly patients or those who are volume depleted or receiving large doses of diuretics or in heart failure are liable to develop hypotensive reaction and/or deterioration in kidney function.