Pharmacokinetic issues for antibiotics in the critically ill patient

Using drug probes to monitor hepatic drug metabolism in critically ill patients: midazolam, a flawed but useful tool for clinical investigation of CYP3A activity?

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

In the UK, acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in 25% of patients admitted to intensive care. Outcome is worsened in the presence of AKI for reasons not easily explained. AKI unpredictably affects the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and dosing in patients with AKI is largely based on data from chronic kidney disease patients, but how appropriately is unknown.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Midazolam as a drug probe of CYP3A activity is reviewed, with discussion of its limitations and alternatives in critically ill patients. Pharmacogenetics of CYP3A enzymes and their significance are discussed and emerging evidence that AKI affects liver metabolism is reviewed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The aim is to give the reader insight into the complexities of in vivo research in critically ill patient with discussion of interaction between the kidney and liver. We explain the use of midazolam as a drug probe for the investigation of the effect of AKI on hepatic function.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Critically ill patients are difficult to manage but methods are now available for investigation of complex interrelationships that complicate the care and management of these patients with the potential to improve safety, efficacy and outcome, particularly for drug administration.

Approaches to improving antibiotic management

New information is available to improve antibiotic outcomes in severe sepsis where increasing resistance and reducing novel compound development make reaching the right decisions ever more difficult and important.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid: a retrospective monocentric analysis

The objective of the present retrospective observational study carried out in patients receiving a standard dosage of linezolid and undergoing routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was to assess the interindividual variability in plasma exposure, to identify the prevalence of attainment of optimal pharmacodynamics, and to define if an intensive program of TDM may be warranted in some categories of patients. Linezolid plasma concentrations (trough [C(min)] and peak [C(max)] levels) were analyzed by means of a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and daily drug exposure was estimated (daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(24)]). The final database included 280 C(min) and 223 C(max) measurements performed in 92 patients who were treated with the fixed 600-mg dose every 12 h (q12h) intravenously (n = 58) or orally (n = 34). A wide variability was observed (median values [interquartile range]: 3.80 mg/liter [1.75 to 7.53 mg/liter] for C(min), 14.70 mg/liter [10.57 to 19.64] for C(max), and 196.08 mg·h/liter [144.02 to 312.10 mg·h/liter] for estimated AUC(24)). Linezolid C(min) was linearly correlated with estimated AUC(24) (r(2) = 0.85). Optimal pharmacodynamic target attainment (defined as C(min) of ≥2 mg/liter and/or AUC(24)/MIC(90) ratio of >80) was obtained in about 60 to 70% of cases, but potential overexposure (defined as C(min) of ≥10 mg/liter and/or AUC(24) of ≥400 mg·h/liter) was documented in about 12% of cases. A significantly higher proportion of cases with potential overexposure received cotreatment with omeprazole, amiodarone, or amlodipine. Our study suggests that the application of TDM might be especially worthwhile in about 30% of cases with the intent of avoiding either the risk of dose-dependent toxicity or that of treatment failure.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactams in critically ill patients: proof of concept

The extreme pharmacokinetic behaviour of drugs sometimes observed in critically ill patients poses a significant threat to the achievement of optimal antibiotic treatment outcomes. Scant information on beta-lactam antibiotic therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is available. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the practicality and utility of a beta-lactam TDM programme in critically ill patients. TDM was performed twice weekly on all eligible patients at a 30-bed tertiary referral critical care unit. Blood concentrations were determined by fast-throughput high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assays and were available within 12h of sampling. Dose adjustment was instituted if the trough or steady-state blood concentration was below 4-5x the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or above 10x MIC. A total of 236 patients were subject to TDM over an 11-month period. The mean+/-standard deviation age was 53.5+/-18.3 years. Dose adjustment was required in 175 (74.2%) of the patients, with 119 of these patients (50.4%) requiring dose increases after the first TDM. For outcome of therapy, 206 (87.3%) courses resulted in a positive treatment outcome and there were 30 (12.7%) treatment failures observed including 14 deaths and 15 courses requiring escalation to broader-spectrum agents; 1 course was ceased due to an adverse drug reaction. Using binomial logistic regression, only an elevated Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (P<0.01) and elevated plasma creatinine concentration (P=0.05) were found to be predictive of mortality. In conclusion, further research is required to determine definitively whether achievement of optimal beta-lactam pharmacodynamic targets improves clinical outcomes.

Vancomycin dosing assessment in intensive care unit patients based on a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulation

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT * Despite the frequent use of vancomycin in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, few studies aimed at characterizing vancomycin population pharmacokinetics have been performed in this critical population. * Population pharmacokinetics coupled with pharmacodynamic analysis, in order to optimize drug exposure and hence antibacterial effectiveness, has been little applied in these specific patients. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS * Our population model characterized the pharmacokinetic profile of vancomycin in adult ICU patients, higher distribution volume values (V) being observed when the patient's serum creatinine (Cr(Se)) was greater than 1 mg dl(-1). * Age and creatinine clearance (CL(cr)) were identified as the main covariates explaining the pharmacokinetic variability in vancomycin CL. * Our pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) simulation should aid clinicians to select initial vancomycin doses that will maximize the rate of response in the ICU setting, taking into account the patient's age and renal function as well as the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus. AIM To estimate the vancomycin pharmacokinetic profile in adult ICU patients and to assess vancomycin dosages for increasing the likelihood of optimal exposure. METHODS Five hundred and sixty-nine concentration-time data from 191 patients were analysed using a population pharmacokinetic approach (NONMEN). External model evaluation was made in 46 additional patients. The 24 h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0,24 h)) was derived from the final model. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for S. aureus were obtained from the EUCAST database. AUC(0,24 h) : MIC >/= 400 was considered as PK/PD efficacy index. The probability of different dosages attaining the target considering different strains of S. aureus and patient subgroups was estimated with Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS Vancomycin CL showed a significant dependence on patient age and renal function whereas Cr(Se) > 1 mg dl(-1) increased V more than twofold. For our representative ICU patient, 61 years, 73 kg, Cr(Se)= 1.4 mg dl(-1), measured CL(Cr)= 74.7 ml min(-1), the estimated values were CL = 1.06 ml min(-1) kg(-1) and V= 2.04 l kg(-1). The cumulative fraction of response for a standard vancomycin dose (2 g day(-1)) was less than 25% for VISA strains, and 33% to 95% for susceptible S. aureus, depending on patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Simulations provide useful information regarding the initial assessment of vancomycin dosing, the conventional dosing regimen probably being suboptimal in adult ICU patients. A graphic approach provides the recommended dose for any selected probability of attaining the PK/PD efficacy target or to evaluate the cumulative fraction of response for any dosing regimen in this population.

Using technology to prevent adverse drug events in the intensive care unit

Critically ill patients are particularly susceptible to adverse drug events (ADEs) due to their rapidly changing and unstable physiology, complex therapeutic regimens, and large percentage of medications administered intravenously. There are a wide variety of technologies that can help prevent the points of failure commonly associated with ADEs (i.e., the five "Rights": right patient; right drug; right route; right dose; right frequency). These technologies are often categorized by their degree of complexity to design and engineer and the type of error they are designed to prevent. Focusing solely on the software and hardware design of technology may over- or underestimate the degree of difficulty to avoid ADEs at the bedside. Alternatively, we propose categorizing technological solutions by identifying the factors essential for success. The two major critical success factors are: 1) the degree of clinical assessment required by the clinician to appropriately evaluate and disposition the issue identified by a technology; and 2) the complexity associated with effective implementation. This classification provides a way of determining how ADE-preventing technologies in the intensive care unit can be successfully integrated into clinical practice. Although there are limited data on the effectiveness of many technologies in reducing ADEs, we will review the technologies currently available in the intensive care unit environment. We will also discuss critical success factors for implementation, common errors made during implementation, and the potential errors using these systems.

Taking the septic patient to the operating room

The acutely septic patient is a multifaceted challenge for the anesthetist. Unlike most elective surgery patients, acutely septic patients have severe systemic disease before the physiologic insults of anesthesia and surgery. The decision to operate is usually informed by the urgent or emergent need to correct a severe surgical problem and weighed against the higher risks of morbidity and mortality from the procedure itself. The care of the septic patient in the intensive care unit can help guide operating room management. However, the acuity and time course of intraoperative events, including hemorrhage and drug-induced shock states, compel the anesthetist to respond aggressively with therapies that may or may not be strongly substantiated with long-term data in the intensive care unit setting. The anesthesiologist must place considerations concerning short-term survival from the acute insult of surgery ahead of longer-term considerations.

Insufficient β-lactam concentrations in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock

Introduction

Altered pharmacokinetics (PK) in critically ill patients can result in insufficient serum β-lactam concentrations when standard dosages are administered. Previous studies on β-lactam PK have generally excluded the most severely ill patients, or were conducted during the steady-state period of treatment. The aim of our study was to determine whether the first dose of piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, and meropenem would result in adequate serum drug concentrations in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Methods

Open, prospective, multicenter study in four Belgian intensive care units. All consecutive patients with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock, in whom treatment with the study drugs was indicated, were included. Serum concentrations of the antibiotics were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) before and 1, 1.5, 4.5 and 6 or 8 hours after administration.

Results

80 patients were treated with piperacillin-tazobactam (n = 27), ceftazidime (n = 18), cefepime (n = 19) or meropenem (n = 16). Serum concentrations remained above 4 times the minimal inhibitory concentration (T > 4 × MIC), corresponding to the clinical breakpoint for Pseudomonas aeruginosa defined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), for 57% of the dosage interval for meropenem (target MIC = 8 μg/mL), 45% for ceftazidime (MIC = 32 μg/mL), 34% for cefepime (MIC = 32 μg/mL), and 33% for piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC = 64 μg/mL). The number of patients who attained the target PK profile was 12/16 for meropenem (75%), 5/18 for ceftazidime (28%), 3/19 (16%) for cefepime, and 12/27 (44%) for piperacillin-tazobactam.

Conclusions

Serum concentrations of the antibiotic after the first dose were acceptable only for meropenem. Standard dosage regimens for piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime and cefepime may, therefore, be insufficient to empirically cover less susceptible pathogens in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis receiving high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Use of high ultrafiltrate flow rates with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVHF) in critically ill patients is an emerging setting, for which there are few data to guide drug dosing. The objectives of this study were, firstly, to investigate the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with severe sepsis who are receiving high-volume CVVHF with high-volume exchanges (> or = 4 liters/h); secondly, to determine whether standard dosing regimens (1,000 mg intravenously [i.v.] every 8 h) are sufficient for treatment of less susceptible organisms such as Burkholderia pseudomallei (MIC, 4 mg/liter); and, finally, to compare the clearances observed in this study with data from previous studies using lower-volume exchanges (1 to 2 liters/h). We recruited 10 eligible patients and collected serial pre- and postfilter blood samples and ultrafiltrate and urine samples. A noncompartmental method was used to determine meropenem pharmacokinetics. The cohort had a median age of 56.6 years, a median weight of 70 kg, and a median APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) score of 25. The median (interquartile range) values for meropenem were as follows: terminal elimination half-life, 4.3 h (2.9 to 6.0); terminal volume of distribution, 0.2 liters/kg (0.2 to 0.3); trough concentration, 7.7 mg/liter (6.2 to 12.9); total clearance, 6.0 liters/h (5.2 to 6.2); hemofiltration clearance, 3.5 liters/h (3.4 to 3.9). In comparing the meropenem clearance here with those in previous studies, ultrafiltration flow rate was found to be the parameter that accounted for the differences in clearance of meropenem (R(2) = 0.89). In conclusion, high-volume CVVHF causes significant clearance of meropenem, necessitating steady-state doses of 1,000 mg every 8 h to maintain sufficient concentrations to treat less susceptible organisms such as B. pseudomallei.

Revisiting the loading dose of amikacin for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock

INTRODUCTION

It has been proposed that doses of amikacin of >15 mg/kg should be used in conditions associated with an increased volume of distribution (Vd), such as severe sepsis and septic shock. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether 25 mg/kg (total body weight) of amikacin is an adequate loading dose for these patients.

METHODS

This was an open, prospective, multicenter study in four Belgian intensive care units (ICUs). All consecutive patients with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock, in whom amikacin treatment was indicated, were included in the study.

RESULTS

In 74 patients, serum samples were collected before (t = 0 h) and 1 hour (peak), 1 hour 30 minutes, 4 hours 30 minutes, 8 hours, and 24 hours after the first dose of amikacin. Blood amikacin levels were measured by using a validated fluorescence polarization immunoassay method, and an open two-compartment model with first-order elimination was fitted to concentrations-versus-time data for amikacin (WinNonlin). In 52 (70%) patients, peak serum concentrations were >64 microg/ml, which corresponds to 8 times the clinical minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints defined by EUCAST for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (S<8, R>16 microg/ml). Vd was 0.41 (0.29 to 0.51) L/kg; elimination half-life, 4.6 (3.2 to 7.8) hours; and total clearance, 1.98 (1.28 to 3.54) ml/min/kg. No correlation was found between the amikacin peak and any clinical or hemodynamic variable.

CONCLUSIONS

As patients with severe sepsis and septic shock have an increased Vd, a first dose of >or= 25 mg/kg (total body weight) of amikacin is required to reach therapeutic peak concentrations. However, even with this higher amikacin dose, the peak concentration remained below therapeutic target levels in about one third of these patients. Optimizing aminoglycoside therapy should be achieved by tight serum-concentration monitoring because of the wide interindividual variability of pharmacokinetic abnormalities.

Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in sepsis and septic shock

This article reviews principles in the rational use of antibiotics in sepsis and septic shock and presents evidence-based recommendations for optimal antibiotic therapy. Every patient with sepsis and septic shock must be evaluated at presentation before the initiation of antibiotic therapy. However, in most situations, an abridged initial assessment focusing on critical diagnostic and management planning elements is sufficient. Intravenous antibiotics should be administered as early as possible, and always within the first hour of recognizing severe sepsis and septic shock. Broad-spectrum antibiotics must be selected with one or more agents active against likely bacterial or fungal pathogens and with good penetration into the presumed source. Antimicrobial therapy should be reevaluated daily to optimize efficacy, prevent resistance, avoid toxicity, and minimize costs. Consider combination therapy in Pseudomonas infections, and combination empiric therapy in neutropenic patients. Combination therapy should be continued for no more than 3 to 5 days and deescalation should occur following availability of susceptibilities. The duration of antibiotic therapy typically is limited to 7 to 10 days; longer duration is considered if response is slow, if there is inadequate surgical source control, or in the case of immunologic deficiencies. Antimicrobial therapy should be stopped if infection is not considered the etiologic factor for a shock state.

[Dosage adjustment of vancomycin in continuous infusion in critically ill-patients]

INTRODUCTION

As the susceptibility of staphylococcal strains to glycopeptides rises, it is becoming necessary to increase vancomycin dosages.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an administration protocol for vancomycin using continuous infusion with a loading dose of 30 mg/kg followed by 30 mg/kg per 24h in intensive care patients presenting creatinine clearance (CLc) greater than 50.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients were included in the study. Serum vancomycin concentrations after 24h (C24h) ranged from 25 to 30 mg/l in seven of 14 patients with CLc less than 120 ml/min (50 %), compared with three patients (21 %) with C24h greater than 35 mg/l and four patients (29 %) with C24 h less than 25 mg/l. However, C24h was less than 20mg/l for the eight patients with CLc greater or equal to 120 ml/min. Bacteriological data was available for eight of the 14 patients with CLc less than 120 ml/min, and in these eight patients, the C24h/MIC was greater or equal to 8; seven of these patients had an AUC/MIC greater or equal to 350.

CONCLUSION

Assay of serum vancomycin concentrations after 24h of treatment is necessary to enable rapid adjustment of vancomycin concentration in order to improve therapeutic efficacy or avoid nephrotoxicity.

First-dose and steady-state population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin by continuous or intermittent dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis

The objectives of this study were (i) to compare the plasma concentration-time profiles for first-dose and steady-state piperacillin administered by intermittent or continuous dosing to critically ill patients with sepsis and (ii) to use population pharmacokinetics to perform Monte Carlo dosing simulations in order to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for different piperacillin dosing regimens against bacterial pathogens commonly encountered in critical care units. Plasma samples were collected on Days 1 and 2 of therapy in 16 critically ill patients, with 8 patients receiving intermittent bolus dosing and 8 patients receiving continuous infusion of piperacillin (administered with tazobactam). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM, which found that a two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model best described the data. Total body weight was found to be correlated with drug clearance and was included in the final model. In addition, 2000 critically ill patients were simulated for pharmacodynamic evaluation of PTA by MIC [free (unbound) concentration maintained above the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval (50% f(T>MIC))] and it was found that continuous infusion maintained superior free piperacillin concentrations compared with bolus administration across the dosing interval. Dosing simulations showed that administration of 16g/day by continuous infusion vs. bolus dosing (4g every 6h) provided superior achievement of the pharmacodynamic endpoint (PTA by MIC) at 93% and 53%, respectively. These data suggest that administration of piperacillin by continuous infusion, with a loading dose, both for first dose and for subsequent dosing achieves superior pharmacodynamic targets compared with conventional bolus dosing.

Impaired glucose and nutrient absorption in critical illness: is gastric emptying only a piece of the puzzle?

This commentary highlights the contribution of the article by Chapman and colleagues assessing the relationships between glucose absorption, glycaemia and gastric emptying during critical illness. In addition to several more expected findings, their data suggest that factors other than slow gastric emptying may limit glucose absorption during critical illness. This hypothesis has received little attention so far, although numerous small intestinal abnormalities possibly interfering with absorption are known to occur in intensive care patients. Future work should focus on further validation of tools to assess nutrient absorption in the critically ill, before defining the precise causes and mechanisms that are involved.

Management of ventilator-associated pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) management depends on the interaction between the infective agent, the host response, and the antimicrobial drug used. After the pathogen reaches the lungs, two outcomes are possible: either the microorganisms are eliminated by the host immune system, or they overcome the immune system and cause pulmonary infection. When a patient is thought to have VAP, two steps are strongly recommended: etiologic diagnostic testing and the immediate initiation of antibiotics. The daily management of VAP remains a challenge for physicians in the ICU. In recent years, a more dynamic approach has evolved, updating local epidemiology, evaluating VAP and diagnostic tools every day, and assessing host response using clinical and biochemical parameters.