Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell and high-grade B-cell lymphomas with synchronous CNS and systemic involvement at diagnosis treated with high-dose methotrexate and R-CHOP: a single-center retrospective study

Background:

The optimal treatment of patients with systemic diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) or high-grade B-cell (HGBL) lymphomas with synchronous central nervous system (CNS) involvement at diagnosis is not well defined. High-dose methotrexate administered concurrently with R-CHOP (RM-CHOP) is a commonly used regimen, but data on outcomes achieved with this regimen are limited.

Objective:

To report our experience with RM-CHOP in patients with systemic DLBCL or HGBL with synchronous CNS involvement at diagnosis.

Design:

A single-center retrospective analysis.

Methods:

We identified consecutive patients with systemic DLBCL or HGBL with synchronous CNS involvement at diagnosis who were treated with RM-CHOP from January 2012 to January 2021.

Results:

Fifty patients were included with a median age of 62 years; 82% had DLBCL (n = 41) and 18% had HGBL (n = 9). Treatment with RM-CHOP was followed by consolidative autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in 14 patients (28%). The complete response (CR) rate following RM-CHOP was 62%. With a median follow-up of 40 months, the median progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survivals were 16 and 58 months, and the 2-year PFS and OS were 41% and 57%, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of CNS progression/relapse was 29%. Outcomes were particularly poor in HGBL, with median PFS and OS of 6 and 7 months, compared with median PFS and OS of 22 months and not reached in DLBCL, respectively. The outcomes of patients with relapsed/progressive disease were poor, with only 63% of patients receiving subsequent treatments and only 21% achieving CR to next subsequent treatment. Most patients (58%) with disease relapse/progression had CNS involvement which was associated with very poor outcomes (median OS of 2 months).

Conclusion:

CNS involvement in aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma at diagnosis dictates clinical outcomes and requires more effective treatment options.

Natural killer cells: the next wave in cancer immunotherapy

Immunotherapies focusing on rejuvenating T cell activities, like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade, have unprecedentedly revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment. Yet a previously underexplored component of the immune system - natural killer (NK) cell, is coming to the forefront of immunotherapeutic attempts. In this review, we discuss the contributions of NK cells in the success of current immunotherapies, provide an overview of the current preclinical and clinical strategies at harnessing NK cells for cancer treatment, and highlight that NK cell-mediated therapies emerge as a major target in the next wave of cancer immunotherapy.

Role of Bispecific Antibodies in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the CART Era

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is an aggressive and biologically heterogeneous disease. R-CHOP is the standard first line therapy and cures more than 60% of patients. Salvage high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant remains the standard second-line treatment for relapsed or refractory patients, and recently, three CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) cell products have been approved beyond 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. Nevertheless, some patients are not eligible for transplant or CARTs, or progress after these treatments. In this context, IgG-like bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have been designed to treat B‐cell lymphomas. They combine two different monospecific antigen‐binding regions that target CD20 on B cells and engage T cells via CD3 in a 1:1 or 2:1 CD20:CD3 antigen binding fragment (Fab) format. The results of different phase 1 trials with BsAbs, including mosunetuzumab, glofitamab, epcoritamab and odeonextamab, have been recently published. They are infused intravenously or subcutaneously, and have a favorable toxicity profile, with reduced cytokine release syndrome and neurological toxicity. Moreover, these BsAbs have demonstrated very promising efficacy in B-cell lymphomas, including in aggressive lymphomas. New trials are currently ongoing to confirm BsAbs efficacy and tolerability, as well as to explore its efficacy in different lines of therapy or in combination with other drugs.

Patient preferences for treatment in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a discrete choice experiment

Aim: We quantified patient preferences for second-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma therapies, including attributes of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Materials & methods: Using a discrete choice experiment, we surveyed 224 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients from the USA and Europe. Patients chose between two treatment options defined by six attributes with predefined levels for overall survival, adverse events (severe cytokine-release syndrome, severe neurological toxicities, severe infection) and time to return to pre-treatment functioning. Results: Increasing the probability of 1-year survival was most important to patients, followed by avoiding risks of cytokine-release syndrome and neurological toxicities. Respondents required a 13-14 percentage point increased 1-year survival probability to accept risks of treatment-associated adverse events. Conclusion: Patients prioritize survival and will accept certain adverse event risks to gain survival improvements.

Infectious complications, immune reconstitution, and infection prophylaxis after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell becomes a breakthrough therapy providing excellent remission rates and durable disease control for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. However, CAR T-cells have several potential side effects including cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicities, cytopenia, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Infection has been increasingly recognized as a complication of CAR T-cell therapy. Several factors predispose CAR T-cell recipients to infection. Fortunately, although studies show a high incidence of infection post-CAR T-cells, most infections are manageable. In contrast to patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant, less is known about post-CAR T-cell immune reconstitution. Therefore, evidence regarding antimicrobial prophylaxis and vaccination strategies in these patients is more limited. As CAR T-cell therapy becomes the standard treatment for R/R B lymphoid malignancies, we should expect a larger impact of infections in these patients and the need for increased clinical attention. Studies exploring infection and immune reconstitution after CAR T-cell therapy are clinically relevant and will provide us with a better understanding of the dynamics of immune function after CAR T-cell therapy including insights into appropriate strategies for prophylaxis and treatment of infections in these patients. In this review, we describe infections in recipients of CAR T-cells, and discuss risk factors and potential mitigation strategies.

Current options and future perspectives in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents the most common subtype of aggressive lymphoma. Depending on individual risk factors, roughly 60–65% of patients can be cured by chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). However, patients with primary refractory disease or relapse (R/R) after an initial response are still characterized by poor outcome. Until now, transplant-eligible R/R DLBCL patients are treated with intensive salvage regimens followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) which, however, only cures a limited number of patients. It is most likely that in patients with early relapse after chemoimmunotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells will replace high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. So far, transplant-ineligible patients have mostly been treated in palliative intent. Recently, a plethora of novel agents comprising new monoclonal antibodies, antibody drug conjugates (ADC), bispecific antibodies, and CAR T-cells have emerged and have significantly improved outcome of patients with R/R DLBCL. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge on the usage of novel drugs and approaches for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel for the treatment of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Axicabtagene ciloleucel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy that was recently approved for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma following progression on two or more lines of therapy including an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with an alkylating agent, providing a therapeutic breakthrough in a subset of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma associated with poor clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we outline the drug profile of axicabtagene ciloleucel in comparison to currently approved agents and other CAR T-cell and T-cell redirecting therapies under investigation for the treatment of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. We also review the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic data from the ZUMA-5 phase II trial, which forms the basis of the recent approval of axicabtagene ciloleucel.

EXPERT OPINION

Axicabtagene ciloleucel is the first cellular therapy approved for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, demonstrating high rates of durable responses and a manageable toxicity profile in heavily pre-treated patients.

[Intensive care management of cancer patients]

Cancer patients compromise about 15-20 % of all patients on the intensive Care Unit (ICU). Moreover, recent therapeutic developments in hematology oncology as chimeric T-cells (CAR T-cells) regularly require critical care and therefore the amount of cancer patients in the ICU is expected to grow in the coming years. Although their prognosis has dramatically improved over the past decades, the mortality on cancer patients on the ICU is still high compared to non-cancer patients. Therefore, the interdisciplinary management of these patients is crucial in order to accurately identify patients who benefit from transfer to the ICU and to optimize treatment of these vulnerable and often complex patients. Consequently, large cohort studies have shown a positive impact of daily interdisciplinary patient visits including hematology-oncology and critical care medicine on survival of cancer patients on the ICU. This short review summarizes current knowledge and open questions in the critical care management of cancer patients.

Clinical trials for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: lessons learned and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize the status and utilization of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy based on the most recent clinical trials in patients with leukemia and lymphoma. Additionally, this review will highlight limitations in current strategies, discuss efforts in toxicity mitigation, and outline future directions for investigation.

RECENT FINDINGS

CD19 targeted CAR-T-cell therapy (CD19-CAR) is highly effective in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell hematologic malignancies. However, multiple challenges have arisen, particularly life-threatening adverse events, such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Despite these challenges, recent CD19-CAR trials, including two randomized studies, have demonstrated both impressive initial results along with durable responses. Combined with results emerging from 'real-world' experience, the efficacy of CAR-T-cells is high, propelling CAR-T-cells studies targeting alternate B-cell antigens [e.g. CD20, CD22 and CD269 (BCMA)] and other targets for hematologic malignancies, along with solid and CNS tumors.

SUMMARY

Given the benefit for CD19-CAR, determining the appropriate place in utilization for both an individual patient's treatment course and more broadly in the generalized treatment paradigm is critically needed. We discuss the most recent trials exploring this topic and future directions in the field.

Budget Impact Analysis of CAR T-cell Therapy for Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Germany

The aim was to assess the incremental costs of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel) compared with standard of care in adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) from the German third-party payer perspective. A budget impact model was established over a 6-year period. Estimation of the third-line population: partitioned survival model based on outcome data from peer-reviewed literature, a top-down approach based on population forecasts, and age-standardized incidences. Cost data were derived from the controlling department of a tertiary hospital and a German cost-of-illness study. In the scenario analysis, the budget impact of treating second-line DLBCL patients was calculated. One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the model. For the period 2021-2026, 788-867 (minimum population, min) and 1,068-1,177 (maximum population, max) adult third-line r/r DLBCL patients were estimated. The budget impact ranged from €39,419,562; €53,426,514 (min; max) in year 0 to €122,104,097; €165,763,001 (min; max) in year 5. The scenario analysis resulted in a budget impact of €65,987,823; €89,558,611 (min; max) and €204,485,031; €277,567,601 (min; max) for years 0 and 5, respectively. This budget impact analysis showed a significant but reasonable financial burden associated with CAR T-cell therapy for a limited number of patients requiring individualized care. Further, this study presents challenges and future needs in data acquisition associated with cost analysis in personalized medicine. For comprehensive economic discussions, complementary cost-effectiveness analyses are required to determine the value of innovative therapies for r/r DLBCL.

EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Epstein Barr virus-positive (EBV+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified (NOS) is an entity included in the WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms since 2016. EBV+ DLBCL, NOS, is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma associated with EBV infection, and a poor prognosis with standard chemotherapeutic approaches.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis is made through a careful pathological evaluation. Detection of EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) is considered standard for diagnosis; however, a clear cutoff for percentage of positive cells has not been defined. The differential diagnosis includes plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL), DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation, primary effusion lymphoma (PEL), among others.

RISK-STRATIFICATION

The International Prognostic Index (IPI) and the Oyama score can be used for risk-stratification. The Oyama score includes age >70 years and presence of B symptoms. The expression of CD30 and PD-1/PD-L1 are emerging as potential adverse but targetable biomarkers.

MANAGEMENT

Patients with EBV+ DLBCL, NOS, should be staged and managed following similar guidelines than patients with EBV-negative DLBCL. EBV+ DLBCL, NOS, however, might have a worse prognosis than EBV-negative DLBCL in the era of chemoimmunotherapy. Therefore, the inclusion of patients in clinical trials when available is recommended. There is an opportunity to study and develop targeted therapy in the management of patients with EBV+ DLBCL, NOS.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel compared to tisagenlecleucel for the treatment of aggressive B-cell lymphoma

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). We performed a retrospective study to evaluate safety and efficacy of axi-cel and tisa-cel outside the setting of a clinical trial. Data from consecutive patients with R/R LBCL who underwent apheresis for axi-cel or tisa-cel were retrospectively collected from 12 Spanish centers. A total of 307 patients underwent apheresis for axi-cel (n=152) and tisa-cel (n=155) from November 2018 to August 2021, of which 261 (85%) received a CAR T infusion (88% and 82%, respectively). Median time from apheresis to infusion was 41 days for axi-cel and 52 days for tisa-cel (P=0.006). None of the baseline characteristics were significantly different between both cohorts. Both cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events (NE) were more frequent in the axi-cel group (88% vs. 73%, P=0.003, and 42% vs. 16%, P<0.001, respectively). Infections in the first 6 months post-infusion were also more common in patients treated with axi-cel (38% vs. 25%, P=0.033). Non-relapse mortality was not significantly different between the axi-cel and tisa-cel groups (7% and 4%, respectively, P=0.298). With a median follow-up of 9.2 months, median PFS and OS were 5.9 and 3 months, and 13.9 and 11.2 months for axi-cel and tisa-cel, respectively. The 12-month PFS and OS for axi-cel and tisa-cel were 41% and 33% (P=0.195), 51% and 47% (P=0.191), respectively. Factors associated with lower OS in the multivariate analysis were increased lactate dehydrogenase, ECOG ≥2 and progressive disease before lymphodepletion. Safety and efficacy results in our real-world experience were comparable with those reported in the pivotal trials. Patients treated with axi-cel experienced more toxicity but similar non-relapse mortality compared with those receiving tisa-cel. Efficacy was not significantly different between both products.

BeEAM High-Dose Chemotherapy with Polatuzumab (Pola-BeEAM) before ASCT in Patients with DLBCL—A Pilot Study

(1) Introduction: BEAM is a high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) frequently administered before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Bendamustine replacing BCNU (BeEAM) is similarly effective at lower toxicities. However, relapse remains the major cause of death in DLBCL. (2) Methods: This is a 12-patient pilot study of the BeEAM preparative regimen with additional polatuzumab vedotin (PV, targeting CD79b) aiming to establish feasibility and to reduce toxicity without increasing the early progression rate. PV was given once at the standard dose of 1.8 mg/kg at day −6 together with BeEAM-HDCT (days −7 to −1) before ASCT. (3) Results: 8/12 patients (67%) received PV with BeEAM as a consolidation of first-line treatment, and 4/12 patients (33%) received PV with BeEAM after relapse treatment. All patients experienced complete engraftment (neutrophils: median 11 days; platelets: 13 days). Gastrointestinal toxicities occurred in 7/12 patients (58%, grade 3). All patients developed neutropenic infections with at least one identified pathogen (bacterial: 10/12 patients; viral: 2/12; and fungal: 1/12). The complete remission rate by PET-CT 100 days post-ASCT was 92%, with one mortality due to early progression. Eleven out of twelve patients (92%) were alive without progression after a median follow-up of 15 months. (4) Conclusions: Our study with 12 patients suggests that combining PV with BeEAM HDCT is feasible and safe, but the limited cohort prevents definite conclusions regarding efficacy. Larger cohorts must be evaluated.

Resource utilization for chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy versus autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with B cell lymphoma

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) have emerged as a highly efficacious treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B cell lymphoma (BCL). The value of CAR-T for these patients is indisputable, but one-off production costs are high, and little is known about the ancillary resource consumption associated with CAR-T treatment. Here, we compared the resource use and costs of CAR-T treatment with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with r/r BCL. Standard operating procedures were used to develop a process model in ClipMed^PPM, which comprises all activities and processes to sustain or generate treatment components that together constitute a treatment path. The software allows a graphic representation and the use of standardized linguistic elements for comparison of different treatment paths. Detailed processes involved in CAR-T treatments (n = 1041 processes) and in ASCT (n = 1535) were analyzed for time consumption of treatment phases and personnel. Process costs were calculated using financial controlling data. CAR-T treatment required ~ 30% less staff time than ASCT (primarily nursing staff) due to fewer chemotherapy cycles, less outpatient visits, and shorter hospital stays. For CAR-T, production costs were ~ 8 × higher, but overall treatment time was shorter compared with ASCT (30 vs 48 days), and direct labor and overhead costs were 40% and 10% lower, respectively. Excluding high product costs, CAR-T uses fewer hospital resources than ASCT for r/r BCL. Fewer hospital days for CAR-T compared to ASCT treatment and the conservation of hospital resources are beneficial to patients and the healthcare system.

CAR T-Cell Therapies in Italy: Patient Access Barriers and Recommendations for Health System Solutions

CAR T-cell therapy has emerged as a potentially transformative immunotherapy for certain B-cell malignancies including relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Unhindered and appropriate access for eligible patients is essential to enable optimal outcomes and depends on effective interplay of stakeholders and processes along the patient's therapeutic journey. In Italy, CAR T-cell therapies have been awarded innovation status by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and were integrated into routine patient care under specific criteria. However, our analysis indicates that fewer than one in five DLBCL patients eligible under the EMA authorization, or around one in three DLBCL patients eligible under the AIFA criteria, received treatment with a licensed CAR T-cell therapy product in 2020. This publication describes key patient access barriers to CAR T-cell therapies in Italy and provides recommendations on potential solutions at the health system level.

Novel Immune-Based treatments for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The Post-CAR T Cell Era

Prognosis for patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poor. Immune-based therapeutic treatments such as CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have dramatically changed the treatment landscape for R/R DLBCL leading to durable remissions in ~ 50% of patients. However, there remains an unmet need for developing novel therapies to improve clinical outcomes of patients not responding or relapsing after CAR T cell therapies. Lack of suitable immunotherapeutic targets and disease heterogeneity represent the foremost challenges in this emerging field. In this review, we discuss the recently approved and emerging novel immunotherapies for patients with R/R DLBCL in the post-CAR T era and the cell surface targets currently used.

Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) primary refractory to or relapsed within 12 months of first-line therapy are at high risk for poor outcomes with current standard of care, platinum-based salvage immunochemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), an autologous, CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has previously demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in third-line or later LBCL. In this Article, we report a prespecified interim analysis of liso-cel versus standard of care as second-line treatment for primary refractory or early relapsed (within 12 months after response to initial therapy) LBCL.

METHODS

TRANSFORM is a global, phase 3 study, conducted in 47 sites in the USA, Europe, and Japan, comparing liso-cel with standard of care as second-line therapy in patients with primary refractory or early (≤12 months) relapsed LBCL. Adults aged 18-75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 1 or less, adequate organ function, PET-positive disease per Lugano 2014 criteria, and candidates for autologous HSCT were randomly assigned (1:1), by use of interactive response technology, to liso-cel (100 × 10⁶ CAR⁺ T cells intravenously) or standard of care. Standard of care consisted of three cycles of salvage immunochemotherapy delivered intravenously-R-DHAP (rituximab 375 mg/m² on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, two infusions of cytarabine 2000 mg/m² on day 2, and cisplatin 100 mg/m² on day 1), R-ICE (rituximab 375 mg/m² on day 1, ifosfamide 5000 mg/m² on day 2, etoposide 100 mg/m² on days 1-3, and carboplatin area under the curve 5 [maximum dose of 800 mg] on day 2), or R-GDP (rituximab 375 mg/m² on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 1)-followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT in responders. Primary endpoint was event-free survival, with response assessments by an independent review committee per Lugano 2014 criteria. Efficacy was assessed per intention-to-treat (ie, all randomly assigned patients) and safety in patients who received any treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03575351, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 23, 2018, and Dec 8, 2020, 232 patients were screened and 184 were assigned to the liso-cel (n=92) or standard of care (n=92) groups. At the data cutoff for this interim analysis, March 8, 2021, the median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 4·4-11·5). Median event-free survival was significantly improved in the liso-cel group (10·1 months [95% CI 6·1-not reached]) compared with the standard-of-care group (2·3 months [2·2-4·3]; stratified hazard ratio 0·35; 95% CI 0·23-0·53; stratified Cox proportional hazards model one-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (74 [80%] of 92 patients in the liso-cel group vs 46 [51%] of 91 patients in the standard-of-care group), anaemia (45 [49%] vs 45 [49%]), thrombocytopenia (45 [49%] vs 58 [64%]), and prolonged cytopenia (40 [43%] vs three [3%]). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events, which are associated with CAR T-cell therapy, occurred in one (1%) and four (4%) of 92 patients in the liso-cel group, respectively (no grade 4 or 5 events). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 44 (48%) patients in the liso-cel group and 44 (48%) in the standard-of-care group. No new liso-cel safety concerns were identified in the second-line setting. There were no treatment-related deaths in the liso-cel group and one treatment-related death due to sepsis in the standard-of-care group.

INTERPRETATION

These results support liso-cel as a new second-line treatment recommendation in patients with early relapsed or refractory LBCL.

FUNDING

Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

Vaccination Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Where Do We Stand?

Immunotherapy is changing the therapeutic landscape of many hematologic diseases, with immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T therapies being its greatest expression. Unfortunately, immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has given less brilliant results up to now, and the only approved drug is the antiCD33 antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin. A promising field of research in AML therapy relies on anti-leukemic vaccination to induce remission or prevent disease relapse. In this review, we analyze recent evidence on AML vaccines and their biological mechanisms. The principal proteins that have been exploited for vaccination strategies and have reached clinical experimental phases are Wilm's tumor 1, proteinase 3, and RHAMM. the majority of data deals with WT1-base vaccines, given also the high expression and mutation rates of WT1 in AML cells. Stimulators of immune responses such as TLR7 agonist and interleukin-2 have also proven anti-leukemic activity both in vivo and in vitro. Lastly, cellular vaccines mainly based on autologous or allogeneic off-the-shelf dendritic cell-based vaccines showed positive results in terms of T-cell response and safety, also in elderly patients. Compared to other immunotherapeutic strategies, anti-AML vaccines have the advantage of being a less toxic and a more manageable approach, applicable also to elderly patients with poorer performance status, and may be used in combination with currently available therapies. As for the best scenario in which to use vaccination, whether in a therapeutic, prophylactic, or preemptive setting, further studies are needed, but available evidence points to poorer results in the presence of active or high-burden disease. Given the poor prognosis of relapsed/refractory or high-risk AML, further research is urgently needed to better understand the biological pathways that sustain its pathogenesis. In this setting, research on novel frontiers of immunotherapy-based agents, among which vaccines represent important actors, is warranted to develop new and efficacious strategies to obtain long-term disease control by immune patrolling.

Management of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas in the Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Population: An Adult vs. Pediatric Perspective

Simple Summary

This review details the diagnosis and treatment of primary non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the pediatric and adolescent population. We also describe treatment modalities such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory NHL in patients that fail or do not respond to the initial therapy. We then detail the current advancements in treatment for patients that fail initial therapy such as CAR T-cell therapy, the use of immunotherapy that target surface makers on malignant cells and highlight areas where further research is needed. The purpose of our review is to inform the pediatric oncology community in regard to the various types of NHLs and emphasize areas where the science is evolving in the treatment of primary, relapsed or refractory disease.

Abstract

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a broad entity which comprises a number of different types of lymphomatous malignancies. In the pediatric and adolescent population, the type and prognosis of NHL varies by age and gender. In comparison to adults, pediatric and adolescent patients generally have better outcomes following treatment for primary NHL. However, relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease is associated with poorer outcomes in many types of NHL such as diffuse large B cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma. Newer therapies have been approved in the use of primary NHL in the pediatric and adolescent population such as Rituximab and other therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy are under investigation for the treatment of R/R NHL. In this review, we feature the characteristics, diagnosis, and treatments of the most common NHLs in the pediatric and adolescent population and also highlight the differences that exist between pediatric and adult disease. We then detail the areas of treatment advances such as immunotherapy with CAR T-cells, brentuximab vedotin, and blinatumomab as well as cell cycle inhibitors and describe areas where further research is needed. The aim of this review is to juxtapose established research regarding pediatric and adolescent NHL with recent advancements as well as highlight treatment gaps where more investigation is needed.

Custom CARs: Leveraging the Adaptability of Allogeneic CAR Therapies to Address Current Challenges in Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL

Cellular therapies have transformed the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL), which typically does not respond well to salvage chemotherapy. Recently, approximately 40% of r/r DLBCL patients across three different trials achieved a complete remission at 1 year after receiving treatment with autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (auto-CARs). These successes have prompted studies of auto-CARs in second-line settings, in which axicabtagene ciloleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel both showed improved event-free survival over autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). While encouraging, this data also highlights that 60% of patients relapse or progress following treatment with auto-CARs. Individual disease characteristics and logistical challenges of cell engineering also limit patients’ eligibility for auto-CARs. Allogeneic CAR T cells (allo-CARs) may address some of these limitations as they may mitigate delays associated with auto-CARs, thereby reducing the need for bridging chemotherapies and increasing availability of cellular products for patients with aggressive lymphomas. By being sourced from healthy donors who have never been exposed to cytotoxic chemotherapy, allo-CARs can be created from T cells with better fitness. Allo-CARs made from specific cellular subsets (e.g., stem cell memory or naïve/early memory T cells) may also have increased efficacy and long-term persistence. Additionally, allo-CARs have been successfully created from other cell types, including natural killer cells, gamma-delta T-cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. These cell types can be engineered to target viral antigens, enabling precision targeting of virally driven DLBCL. As allogeneic donor cells can be banked and cryopreserved in batches, they can be made more readily available, potentially reducing logistical hurdles and costs compared to engineering auto-CARs. This may ultimately create a more sustainable platform for cell therapies. Challenges with allo-CARs that will need to be addressed include graft versus host disease, alloimmunization, potentially decreased persistence relative to auto-CARs, and antigen escape. In short, the adaptability of allo-CARs makes them ideal for treating patients with r/r DLBCL who have progressed through standard chemotherapy, AHCT, or auto-CARs. Here, we review the published literature on patients with r/r DLBCL treated with allogeneic CAR products manufactured from various cell types as well as forthcoming allogeneic CAR technologies.

Bispecific CAR T-cells for B-cell malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies including acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. All of the CARs approved for clinical use in treating B-cell malignancies are directed against a single antigen, CD19. Although the initial response rates are high, a significant number of patients relapse, with antigen loss being one proposed mechanism of treatment failure. Multi-targeted CAR T approaches are now being developed to overcome this limitation of currently approved CAR products.

AREAS COVERED

Here we discuss the mechanism of antigen loss, various bispecific CAR T-cell constructs and their efficacy and safety in the pre-clinical as well as clinical settings.

EXPERT OPINION

Although CD19 CAR T-cells have significantly improved response rates in relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies, relapse remains a major barrier to long-term survival. Bispecific CAR T-cells offer an alternative approach to mitigate relapse associated with antigen loss. In B-cell malignancies, various bispecific CAR constructs are being studied. The CD19/CD20 and CD19/CD22 bispecific CARs have shown a favorable efficacy and safety profile in phase I trials. However, larger phase II studies and longer follow ups are needed to better assess their efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies.

Development of anti-somatostatin receptors CAR T cells for treatment of neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) overexpress somatostatin receptors (SSTRs).

METHODS

We developed a second-generation, ligand-based, anti-SSTR chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) incorporating the somatostatin analog octreotide in its extracellular moiety.

RESULTS

Anti-SSTR CAR T cells exerted antitumor activity against SSTR+NET cell linesin vitro. The killing activity was highly specific, as demonstrated by the lack of CAR T cell reactivity against NET cells engineered to express mutated variants of SSTR2/5 by CRISPR/Cas9. When adoptively transferred in NSG mice, anti-SSTR CAR T cells induced significant antitumor activity against human NET xenografts. Although anti-SSTR CAR T cells could recognize the murine SSTRs as shown by their killing ability against murine NET cells, no obvious deleterious effects on SSTR-expressing organs such as the brain or the pancreas were observed in mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our results establish anti-SSTR CAR T cells as a potential candidate for early phase clinical investigations in patients with NETs. More broadly, the demonstration that a known peptide drug can direct CAR T cell targeting may streamline the potential utility of multiple peptide motifs and provide a blueprint for therapeutic applications in a variety of cancers.

Barriers to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapies in Clinical Practice

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a revolutionary cancer treatment modality where a patient’s own T cells are collected and engineered ex vivo to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). These reprogrammed CAR-T cells, when reinfused into the same patient, stimulate a T-cell mediated immune response against the antigen-expressing malignant cells leading to cell death. The initial results from pivotal clinical trials of CAR-T agents have been promising, leading to multiple approvals in various hematologic malignancies in the relapsed setting, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and, more recently, multiple myeloma. However, since the initial trials and US Food and Drug Administration approvals, there have been significant barriers to the widespread use of this therapy. The barriers to the use of CAR-T therapy include complex logistics, manufacturing limitations, toxicity concerns, and financial burden. This review discusses potential solutions to overcome these barriers in order to make this life-changing therapy widely accessible.

Longitudinal Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Activity Data during CAR-T Therapy: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Data Visualization

Background: Clinicians must closely monitor patients for toxicities after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (e.g., toxicities, quality of life) and activity data (e.g., steps, sleep) may complement clinicians’ observations. This study tested the feasibility and acceptability of collecting PROs and activity data from patients with hematologic malignancies during CAR-T and explored preliminary data patterns. Methods: Participants wore a Fitbit tracker and completed PROs at several timepoints through 90-days post-infusion. Feasibility was assessed with a priori benchmarks for recruitment (≥50%), retention (≥70%), PRO completion (≥70%), and days wearing the Fitbit (≥50%). Acceptability was assessed with participant satisfaction (a priori benchmark > 2 on a 0−4 scale). Results: Participants (N = 12) were M = 66 years old (SD = 7). Rates of recruitment (68%), retention (83%), PRO completion (85%), and days wearing the Fitbit (85%) indicated feasibility. Satisfaction with completing the PROs (M = 3.2, SD = 0.5) and wearing the Fitbit (M = 2.9, SD = 0.5) indicated acceptability. Preliminary data patterns suggested that participants with better treatment response (vs. progressive disease) had a higher toxicity burden. Conclusions: Longitudinal PRO and activity data collection was feasible and acceptable. Data collected on a larger scale may be used to specify risk prediction models to identify predictors of severe CAR-T-related toxicities and inform early interventions.

Systematic Review of Available CAR-T Cell Trials around the World

Simple Summary

CAR-T cells are genetically modified T cells that are reprogrammed to specifically eliminate cancer cells. Due to its clinical success to treat certain hematological malignancies, novel approaches to improve CAR-T cell-based therapies are being explored. This systematic review gives a worldwide overview of clinical trials evaluating new CAR-T cell therapies against different types of cancers, detailing the latest trends in CAR-T cell development.

Abstract

In this systematic review, we foresee what could be the approved scenario in the next few years for CAR-T cell therapies directed against hematological and solid tumor malignancies. China and the USA are the leading regions in numbers of clinical studies involving CAR-T. Hematological antigens CD19 and BCMA are the most targeted, followed by mesothelin, GPC3, CEA, MUC1, HER2, and EGFR for solid tumors. Most CAR constructs are second-generation, although third and fourth generations are being largely explored. Moreover, the benefit of combining CAR-T treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other drugs is also being assessed. Data regarding product formulation and administration, such as cell phenotype, transfection technique, and cell dosage, are scarce and could not be retrieved. Better tracking of trials’ status and results on the ClinicalTrials.gov database should aid in a more concise and general view of the ongoing clinical trials involving CAR-T cell therapy.

CAR T-cell Therapy in Highly-Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: Emerging Biological and Clinical Insights

Recently, significant progress has been made in identifying novel therapies, beyond conventional immunochemotherapy strategies, with efficacy in B-cell lymphomas. One such approach involves targeting the CD19 antigen on B-cells with autologous-derived chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) cells. This strategy is highly effective in patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) as evidenced by recent regulatory approvals. Recent reports suggest that this is an effective strategy for high-grade B-cell. The biological underpinnings of these entities and how they overlap with each other and DLBCL continue to be areas of intense investigation. Therefore, as more experience with CAR T-cell approaches is examined, it is interesting to consider how both tumor-cell specific and microenvironment factors that define these highly aggressive subsets influence susceptibility to this approach.

CAR T cells as a second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: a paradigm shift?

The standard of care treatment strategy for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has been high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) if chemotherapy sensitive in suitable patients. Because of treatment intensity, this approach has only been feasible in half of patients and because of chemotherapy resistance has only been successful in a quarter of transplant-eligible patients. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, using genetically modified autologous T cells targeting CD19, has been approved for third-line therapy of LBCL and has been associated with durable remissions in a proportion of patients. In this review, we interpret the design and results of 3 randomized phase 3 trials comparing CAR T-cell therapy and ASCT and their implications for CAR T-cell therapy as a potential new standard of care for second-line treatment in appropriate patients with refractory or early relapsing LBCL.

Outcomes of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Older Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Data for outcomes after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients ≥70 years are limited. Auto-HCT is feasible in older DLBCL patients. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we compared outcomes of auto-HCT in DLBCL patients aged 60 to 69 years (n = 363) versus ≥70 years (n = 103) between 2008 and 2019. Non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression (REL), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were modeled using Cox proportional hazards models. All patients received BEAM conditioning (carmustine, etoposide, cytosine arabinoside and melphalan). On univariate analysis, in the 60 to 69 years versus ≥70 years cohorts, 100-day NRM was 3% versus 4%, 5-year REL was 47% versus 45%, 5-year PFS 40% versus 38% and 5-year OS 55% versus 41%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients ≥70 had no significant difference in NRM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-2.39), REL (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79-1.56), PFS (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.92-1.63) compared to patients 60 to 69 years. Patients ≥70 years had a higher mortality (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.85, p=0.02), likely because of inferior post-relapse OS in this cohort (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.27-2.61, P = .001). DLBCL was the major cause of death in both cohorts (62% versus 59%). Older patients should not be denied auto-HCT solely on the basis of chronological age.

New and emerging therapies for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Approximately 40% of patients with DLBCL will experience disease relapse or will be refractory to first line chemoimmunotherapy, necessitating second-line salvage therapy. This has historically consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with curative intent for transplant-eligible patients or palliative chemotherapy for transplant-ineligible patients. In recent years there have been several new therapeutic agents approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL, thereby expanding the therapeutic landscape. These agents include polatuzumab vedotin, tafasitamab, loncastuximab tesirine, selinexor, and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies such as axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel. This review summarizes the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, dosing, and administration of new agents recently approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Outcomes of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and influence of chimaeric antigen receptor T trial eligibility criteria in second line-A population-based study of 736 patients

Several recently published trials investigate novel therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). To estimate the benefit of these therapies in the real‐world setting, comprehensive data on patients treated in clinical routine are needed. We report outcomes for 736 R/R DLBCL patients identified among all curatively treated DLBCL patients in Sweden in the period 2007–2014. Survival and associations with disease characteristics, second‐line treatment and fulfilment of chimaeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell trial criteria were assessed. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.6 months (≤70 years 9.6 months, >70 years 4.9 months). Early relapse (≤12 months) was strongly associated with selection of less intensive treatment and poor survival. Among patients of at most 70 years of age, 63% started intensive second‐line treatment and 34% received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Two‐year OS among transplanted patients was 56% (early relapse ≤12 months 40%, late relapse >12 months 66%). A minority of patients 76 years (n = 178/506, 35%) fitted CAR T trial criteria. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) for patients with early relapse fitting trial criteria was 4.8 months. In conclusion, most R/R DLBCL manifest early and are often ineligible for or cannot complete intensive regimens resulting in dismal survival. Real‐world patients eligible for CAR T trials also did poorly, providing a benchmark for efficacy of novel therapies.

Revising the Treatment Pathways in Lymphoma: New Standards of Care-How Do We Choose?

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma are the most commonly encountered non-Hodgkin lymphomas in clinical practice. Both are biologically heterogeneous, with management strategies that are becoming increasingly complex. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma typically exhibits aggressive behavior but can be cured in the majority of cases with immunochemotherapy. While R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) has been the standard of care for decades, the recent combination of polatuzumab-vedotin-R-CHP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone) has demonstrated improved progression-free survival for patients with intermediate- and intermediate-high-risk disease. Numerous novel therapies, including targeted agents and immunotherapy-based approaches, have recently been approved for relapsed/refractory disease and have led to improved outcomes. Follicular lymphoma is an indolent lymphoma that remains incurable with standard approaches. Overall survival in most patients is excellent, although a proportion of patients will have early relapsing disease and poorer outcomes. The availability of novel agents in the relapsed/refractory setting has shifted the treatment algorithm, which requires thoughtful consideration of sequencing. This article will review recent developments in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

CAR T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Progressive Muscular Dystrophy: A Case Report

Muscular dystrophies are a heterogeneous group of genetically inherited degenerative disorders defined by dystrophic features on pathological assessment of muscle biopsy specimens. Muscular dystrophies and lymphoma are not common concomitant diseases. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy for lymphoma patients with inherited degenerative diseases, such as muscular dystrophies, has not been previously reported. We report a relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patient with progressive muscular dystrophy (PMD) characterized by progressive muscle weakness that affected the limb, axial and facial muscles. He was identified to be a germline DYSF p.R204* homozygous mutation carrier. The patient received a murine monoclonal anti-CD19 and anti-CD22 CAR T-cell “cocktail” and suffered from a mild case of grade 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). One month after the CAR T-cell infusion, he achieved complete remission of his lymphoma without minimal residual disease (MRD), as assessed by radiography. One year after the infusion, the Deauville score was stable at 1. Currently, patient has been in remission for over three years after receiving anti-CD19 and anti-CD22 CAR T-cell therapy. This case provides evidence for the use of CAR T-cell therapy in lymphoma patients with inherited degenerative disorders. Achieving remission of the lymphoma and subsequent administration of γ-globulin as well as zoledronic acid reduced the muscular dystrophy symptoms.

Enrollment of Black Participants in Pivotal Clinical Trials Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy for Hematological Malignant Neoplasms

IMPORTANCE

Disparities that affect Black persons with various hematological malignant neoplasms are substantial, yet little is known about disparities related to the use of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the enrollment of Black participants in clinical trials that resulted in a subsequent FDA approval of CAR-T products in hematological malignant neoplasms.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A cross-sectional study was performed using publicly available data on drug products and demographic subgroups from Drugs@fda in the period of August 2017 to May 2021. Data analysis included patients with large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma who were enrolled into 7 clinical trials that investigated various CAR-T products. The study was conducted from July 1, 2021, to November 30, 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Frequencies of participation of Black participants were calculated with adjustment for disease prevalence.

RESULTS

Of the 1057 enrolled patients included in the study, CAR-T products were given to 746 patients (71%), and efficacy was reported for 729 enrolled patients (69%) across all the approved CAR-T products and indications. Most patients (1015 patients [96%]) were enrolled in the US. Black participants were included in the racial category other in the study that supported tisagenlecleucel approval in acute lymphoblastic leukemia; otherwise, their enrollment was specified either in the study publication and/or the demographic subgroup information available under the FDA product labeling information. The number of Black participants who received the CAR-T product and had reported efficacy varied between studies (range, 1-12 participants [2%-5%]). Adjusted prevalence measures showed the lowest participation to prevalence ratio of 0.2 for multiple myeloma and 0.6 for large B cell lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that there are substantial disparities affecting Black patients across all approved CAR-T products used to treat hematological malignant neoplasms with otherwise limited effective treatment options. The study findings might aid policy discussions regarding the immediate need of regulations that enforce certain thresholds of Black patients' enrollment before granting FDA approval.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel as first-line therapy in high-risk large B-cell lymphoma: the phase 2 ZUMA-12 trial

High-risk large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has poor outcomes with standard first-line chemoimmunotherapy. In the phase 2, multicenter, single-arm ZUMA-12 study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03761056) we evaluated axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, as part of first-line treatment in 40 patients with high-risk LBCL. This trial has completed accrual. The primary outcome was complete response rate (CRR). Secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), assessment of safety, central nervous system (CNS) relapse and blood levels of CAR T cells and cytokines. The primary endpoint in efficacy-evaluable patients (n = 37) was met, with 78% CRR (95% confidence interval (CI), 62-90) and 89% ORR (95% CI, 75-97). As of 17 May 2021 (median follow-up, 15.9 months), 73% of patients remained in objective response; median DOR, EFS and PFS were not reached. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events occurred in three patients (8%) and nine patients (23%), respectively. There were no treatment-related grade 5 events. Robust CAR T-cell expansion occurred in all patients with a median time to peak of 8 days. We conclude that axi-cel is highly effective as part of first-line therapy for high-risk LBCL, with a manageable safety profile.

Loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a review of clinical data

Loncastuximab tesirine-lpyl (ADC Therapeutics) is an anti-CD19 antibody-drug conjugate which consists of anti-CD19 antibody and cytotoxic alkylating agent, SG3199. Data from preclinical in vitro and animal studies demonstrated its selectivity and efficacy. The phase I LOTIS-1 study for relapsed, refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) demonstrated efficacy and a tolerable safety profile, with major adverse effects being neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated liver enzymes, and fluid accumulation. Based on pharmacokinetics analysis in this study, a dose of 150 μg/kg every 3 weeks for cycles 1 and 2 followed by 75 μg/kg every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerability was chosen for the phase II LOTIS-2 study. This study recruited relapsed, refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and confirmed similar safety profile. Overall response rate was 48.6% (24.1% complete response), and overall survival was 9.9 months. Due to its safety and efficacy reported in the above trials, loncastuximab tesirine was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsed, refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Several clinical trials are ongoing to assess its safety and efficacy in NHL in various clinical settings.

A drug profile on selinexor for the treatment of refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of selinexor, the first commercially available exportin inhibitor, has been evaluated in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received at least 2 lines of therapy. Its role in treatment of DLBCL requires a review of current evidence.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the pharmacology of selinexor and the clinical trials of the medication for the treatment of patients with DLBCL. To clarify the role of selinexor in the treatment of DLBCL, a PubMed search was performed for articles on currently available treatments for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL.

EXPERT OPINION

Selinexor, which is administered orally, benefits from an advantageous pharmacokinetic profile with toxicity limited to hematological and digestive side effects. It has little or no interaction with other medications and no dose adjustment is required for patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Selinexor has been assessed for treatment of R/R DLBCL in one phase I and one phase II trial. Those studies found a 28% overall response rate, including 12% complete remission, with a median duration of response of 9.3 months. If selinexor's effectiveness as monotherapy is limited, it remains an option when there are no other therapeutic possibilities and can then give long-lasting responses.

Cytopenia after CAR-T Cell Therapy-A Brief Review of a Complex Problem

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy has emerged as an efficacious and life extending treatment modality with high response rates and durable remissions in patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), follicular lymphoma, and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) as well as in other diseases. Prolonged or recurrent cytopenias after CAR-T therapy have increasingly been reported at varying rates, and the pathogenesis of this complication is not yet well-understood but is likely contributed to by multiple factors. Current studies reported are primarily retrospective, heterogeneous in terms of CAR-Ts used and diseases treated, non-uniform in definitions of cytopenias and durations for end points, and vary in terms of recommended management. Prospective studies and correlative laboratory studies investigating the pathophysiology of prolonged cytopenias will enhance our understanding of this phenomenon. This review summarizes knowledge of these cytopenias to date.

DLBCL 1L—What to Expect beyond R-CHOP?

Simple Summary

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. About two-thirds of patients are cured by the first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC), the R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisolone) immunochemotherapy protocol. The profound molecular heterogeneity of DLBCL is the underlying reason why many patients, despite improved next-line options, eventually succumb to the disease. Hence, enhancing the efficacy of 1L treatment is critical for improving long-term outcomes in DLBCL. A plethora of novel treatment options with potential in later lines is currently under evaluation in 1L settings. We summarize here the established and emerging strategies for newly diagnosed DLBCL and emphasize the need for individualized treatment decisions.

Abstract

The R-CHOP immunochemotherapy protocol has been the first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients for decades and is curative in approximately two-thirds of patients. Numerous randomized phase III trials, most of them in an “R-CHOP ± X” design, failed to further improve outcomes. This was mainly due to increased toxicity, the large proportion of patients not in need of more than R-CHOP, and the extensive molecular heterogeneity of the disease, raising the bar for “one-size-fits-all” concepts. Recently, an R-CHP regimen extended by the anti-CD79b antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) Polatuzumab Vedotin proved superior to R-CHOP in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) in the POLARIX phase III trial. Moreover, a number of targeted agents, especially the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor Ibrutinib, seem to have activity in certain patient subsets in 1L and are currently being tested in front-line regimens. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, achieving remarkable results in ≥3L scenarios, are being exploited in earlier lines of therapy, while T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies emerge as conceptual competitors of CAR T-cells. Hence, we present here the findings and lessons learnt from phase III 1L trials and piloting phase II studies in relapsed/refractory (R/R) and 1L settings, and survey chemotherapy-free regimens with respect to their efficacy and future potential in 1L. Novel agents and their mode of action will be discussed in light of the molecular landscape of DLBCL and personalized 1L perspectives for the challenging patient population not cured by the SOC.

CD19-Targeted Immunotherapies for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were, for many years, the only available cancer treatments. Recently, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapies has emerged as promising alternative. These cancer immunotherapies are aimed to support or harness the patient's immune system to recognize and destroy cancer cells. Preclinical and clinical studies, based on the use of T cells and more recently NK cells genetically modified with chimeric antigen receptors retargeting the adoptive cell therapy towards tumor cells, have already shown remarkable results. In this review, we outline the latest highlights and progress in immunotherapies for the treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, focusing on CD19-targeted immunotherapies. We also discuss current clinical trials and opportunities of using immunotherapies to treat DLBCL patients.

All roads lead to targeted diffuse large B-cell lymphoma approaches

Two recent reports in the New England Journal of Medicine highlight the successful application of novel targeted therapies to improve the clinical outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). These findings encourage us to pursue further mechanism-based therapeutic uses to make DLBCL curable in the era of precision medicine.

Real-world eligibility for second-line CAR-T cell therapy in large B-cell lymphoma: a population-based analysis

The ZUMA-7 trial demonstrated the superiority of second-line CAR-T cell therapy over standard of care chemotherapy +/- autotransplant for relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). We conducted a retrospective, population-based analysis to determine eligibility for second-line CAR-T cell therapy in the real-world setting. Among 125 patients with r/r LBCL between 2015-2019, 82% progressed within 12 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), 40% were treated with intention-to-transplant, 22% underwent autotransplant, and 7% achieved a durable remission after autotransplant. With median follow-up time 2.8 years, median OS was 5.1 months and 3-year OS was 15% (95% CI 7-20%) for all patients and 10% (95% CI 5-17%) for those progressing within 12 months of CIT. Although only 14% of patients fulfilled all ZUMA-7 study inclusion criteria, as many as 65% of patients progressing within 12 months of CIT had adequate performance status to be considered potentially eligible for second-line CAR-T cell therapy. Whereas the current standard of care results in poor outcomes for most patients with r/r LBCL, the use of CAR-T cell therapy in second line could substantially increase the proportion of patients able to receive curative-intent treatment at first progression of LBCL.