CYP2D6 genotype, antidepressant use, and tamoxifen metabolism during adjuvant breast cancer treatment

TGFbeta2 and TbetaRII are valid molecular biomarkers for the antiproliferative effects of tamoxifen and tamoxifen metabolites in breast cancer cells

Response to treatment with the antiestrogen tamoxifen is variable and at least partially due to its highly complex metabolism. Tamoxifen is transformed by polymorphic and inducible cytochrome P450 enzymes to a large number of metabolites with varying biological activities. The estrogen receptor dependent growth inhibitory effect of antiestrogens is mediated by activation of antiproliferative Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGFbeta) signal transduction pathways. The aim of the present study was to establish if TGFbeta2 or TGFbeta receptor II (TbetaRII), could be used as markers to assess the pharmacological potency of tamoxifen and its metabolites. Consequently, we analyzed the growth inhibitory effect of tamoxifen and its major metabolites and explored whether it correlated with their capacity to induce TGFbeta2 and TbetaRII expression. Human breast cancer cells (MCF-7 and T47D) were treated with tamoxifen and tamoxifen metabolites and mRNA expression of TGFbeta2 and TbetaRII was analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. Only two metabolites 4-hydroxytamoxifen and N-desmethyl-4-hydroxytamoxifen had significant antiproliferative activity and were able to induce TGFbeta2 and TbetaRII. Plasma concentrations of these metabolites are usually very low in patients. However, even minor growth inhibitory effects at concentrations which are below the limit of quantification in plasma samples resulted in clearly discernible effects on expression of TGFbeta2 and TbetaRII. Taken together, our data demonstrate that TGFbeta2 and TbetaRII are very specific and sensitive biomarkers for the antiestrogenic activity of tamoxifen metabolites in breast cancer.

Therapeutic options for the management of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors: An evidence-based review

BACKGROUND

Women with breast cancer may experience treatment-induced menopausal symptoms or natural menopause. Menopausal symptoms, particularly hot flashes, are reported at a high frequency in this group and tend to be more severe, distressing, and of greater duration than in controls. Because of the contribution of sex hormones to breast cancer, the use of hormonal agents for the control of hot flashes is problematic in these women. Safer nonhormonal alternatives are recommended for this patient group.

OBJECTIVES

This was a systematic review of the therapeutic options for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched from 1990 to July 2006 using the disease-specific term breast neoplasms and the subheadings menopause and hot flashes. EMBASE was searched from 1990 to March 2006 using the disease-specific subject headings breast tumor/ breast cancer and menopause and the key word hot flashes. The reference lists of the identified articles and relevant review articles were examined for additional publications. Pertinent articles and abstracts of large randomized controlled trials focusing on the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors were selected for review. Pilot studies were excluded.

RESULTS

A number of nonpharmacologic approaches are available for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors, although they appear to be of limited effectiveness. Complementary alternative medicine therapies and vitamin E have been found to have modest effectiveness at best, and data on their long-term safety are not available. Centrally active agents such as the antidepressants venlafaxine and paroxetine and the anti seizure agent gabapentin have shown clinical effectiveness and appear to be reasonably well tolerated in this population.

CONCLUSIONS

Centrally active agents (eg, venlafaxine, paroxetine, gabapentin) are regarded as the most promising nonhormonal treatments for hot flashes in breast cancer survivors. Nonpharmacologic and complementary alternative medicine therapies have limited effectiveness.

Endocrine Effects of Breast Cancer Treatment

OBJECTIVES

To discuss long-term physical effects of treatment for breast cancer including effects on reproductive, bone, sexual health, and related women's issues.

DATA SOURCES

Research articles, abstracts, literature reviews.

CONCLUSION

Long-term effects of treatment have become increasingly prevalent in breast cancer survivors. The most common are effects on reproductive, bone, and sexual health.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Long-term effects of treatment can have a significant negative impact on the long-term health and QOL of women with breast cancer. Oncology nurses are well-positioned to anticipate and address the reproductive and endocrine consequences of breast cancer treatment.

Pharmacogenetics and oncology treatment for breast cancer

Breast cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women in the US and the UK, accounting for 15-17% of all female cancer deaths. Current treatment strategies include hormone therapy, such as anti-estrogens (tamoxifen) and aromatase inhibitors (exemastane, anastrozole, letrozole), as well as cytotoxics, such as the taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel). With multiple therapy choices, a method to prospectively screen patients prior to therapy selection is now needed. Pharmacogenetics seeks to develop screening mechanisms to optimise drug therapy. DNA variations in metabolism, transport and drug target genes may contribute to chemotherapy efficacy and toxicities. The status of the identification of genetic markers for breast cancer therapy selection is highlighted in this review.

Characterization of tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen glucuronidation by human UGT1A4 variants

Introduction

Tamoxifen (TAM) is an antiestrogen widely used in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer in women. One of the major mechanisms of metabolism of TAM and one of its major active metabolites, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OH-TAM), is via glucuronidation. In the present study, the glucuronidating activities of three common variant isoforms encoded by the human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A4 gene were examined against TAM, trans-4-OH-TAM and cis-4-OH-TAM.

Methods

HPLC was used to detect glucuronide conjugates in microsomes from UGT1A4-overexpressing HK293 cells. The UGT1A4 wild-type cDNA was synthesized by RT-PCR using normal human liver total RNA. The UGT1A4^24Thr/48Leu and UGT1A4^24Pro/48Val variants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis of the pcDNA3.1/V5-His-TOPO plasmid expressing wild-type UGT1A4^24Pro/48Leu. Levels of UGT1A4 expression in UGT-overexpressing cell lines were measured by western blot analysis.

Results

Microsomes from wild-type UGT1A4^24Pro/48Leu-overexpressing HK293 cells exhibited significant levels of activity against TAM, trans-4-OH-TAM and cis-4-OH-TAM, forming exclusively the tamoxifen quaternary ammonium glucuronide (TAM-N⁺-glucuronide) and the 4-hydroxytamoxifen quaternary ammonium glucuronides (trans-4-OH-TAM-N⁺-glucuronide and cis-4-OH-TAM-N⁺-glucuronide) with apparent K_m values of 2.0 μM, 2.2 μM, and 2.1 μM, respectively. Higher glucuronidation activities were found by kinetic analysis for microsomes from the variant UGT1A4^24Pro/48Val-overexpressing cell line as compared with microsomes from wild-type UGT1A4^24Pro/48Leu-overexpressing cells against TAM and against both the trans and cis isomers of 4-OH-TAM. A significantly (P < 0.02) lower K_m value (~1.6-fold to 1.8-fold) was observed for both 4-OH-TAM isomers, while a near-significant (P = 0.053) decrease in K_m was observed for TAM for the UGT1A4^24Pro/48Val variant as compared with wild-type UGT1A4. The V_max/K_m ratio for the UGT1A4^24Pro/48Val variant was significantly (P ≤ 0.005) higher than that observed for the wild-type UGT1A4 isoform for both the trans and cis isomers of 4-OH-TAM after normalization for UGT1A4 expression by western blotting. No significant effect on enzyme kinetics was observed for the UGT1A4^24Thr/48Leu variant against either isomer of 4-OH-TAM or with TAM.

Conclusion

These data suggest that the UGT1A4 codon 48 Leu>Val polymorphism significantly alters glucuronidation rates against TAM and its active hydroxylated metabolites, and that this polymorphism may play an important role in individual pharmacological response to TAM therapy.

Molecular-based choice of cancer therapy: realities and expectations

Current choice of cancer therapy is usually empirical and relies mainly on the statistical prediction of the treatment success. Molecular research provides some opportunities to personalize antitumor treatment. For example, life-threatening toxic reactions can be avoided by the identification of subjects, who carry susceptible genotypes of drug-metabolizing genes (e.g. TPMT, UGT1A1, MTHFR, DPYD). Tumor sensitivity can be predicted by molecular portraying of targets and other molecules associated with drug response. Tailoring of antiestrogen and trastuzumab therapy based on hormone and HER2 receptor status has already become a classical example of customized medicine. Other predictive markers have been identified both for cytotoxic and for targeted therapies, and include, for example, expression of TS, TP, DPD, OPRT, ERCC1, MGMT, TOP2A, class III beta-tubulin molecules as well as genomic alterations of EGFR, KIT, ABL oncogenes.

The evolution of targeted biologic therapies

Targeted therapies for breast cancer reflect the underlying genomic complexity of the disease. These cancers, in turn, are Darwinian constructs, acting much like species undergoing mutational events, and with environmental pressures selecting evolutionary winners and losers. It is therefore reasonable to consider the evolution of targeted biologic therapies in classic evolutionary terms. This paper will examine breast cancer therapeutics in terms of species undergoing adaptational changes as a consequence on mutational events, and will examine the prospects for new therapeutic species.

Chemoprevention of breast cancer with selective oestrogen-receptor modulators

Twenty years ago, a new therapeutic dimension was conceived that not only had the potential to treat and prevent osteoporosis, but to prevent breast and endometrial cancer at the same time. As osteoporosis was known to be caused by oestrogen withdrawal after menopause, whereas breast and endometrial cancer are caused by unopposed oestrogen action, the new tissue-selective oestrogens and anti-oestrogens, or selective oestrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs), had to recruit new networks to activate or suppress target tissues selectively. New medicines now promise to provide chemoprevention strategies for women at risk for the development of many diseases.

Prognostic factors of early distant recurrence in hormone receptor-positive, postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy

BACKGROUND

Current adjuvant hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer is debatable between upfront aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and sequential treatment with tamoxifen. A major concern is the higher rate of early recurrences observed with sequential treatment. The authors conducted a retrospective analysis to identify risk factors of early recurrences in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, postmenopausal women within the first 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen.

METHODS

Between 1986 and 2000, operable breast cancer patients who received exclusively adjuvant tamoxifen for at least 3 years were selected from the authors' institutional database. Age, histology, pathologic tumor size, modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (mSBR) grade, mitotic index, tumor necrosis, peritumoral vascular emboli (PVE), HR status, and the number of involved axillary lymph-node were considered as prognostic factors of recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 715 patients who met the inclusion criteria, a distant recurrence occurred in 38 patients (5.3%) within the first 3 years of tamoxifen therapy. Significant prognostic factors of early recurrence were mSBR, axillary lymph node involvement, tumor necrosis, mitotic index, PVE, and pathologic tumor size. Grade 1 and/or lymph node-negative tumors were excluded from the multivariate analysis (1 recurrence in 208 patients). In this model, mSBR grade 3 was the only significant predictive factor of early recurrence (hazard ratio, 3.72; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a subset of patients was identified that was at low-risk of early recurrence (mSBR grade 1 and/or negative lymph node status). Women in that subset could be treated using sequential hormone therapy with tamoxifen and AIs. In women with mSBR grade 3 or lymph node-positive tumors, an upfront treatment with AIs seemed to be the current optimal strategy.

Menopause: evidence-based practice

Menopause is a physiologic transition and is assuming an increasing importance as the demographic bulge moves through this phase. The transition takes place over several years. It is characterized by depletion of the ovarian follicles, decreasing inhibin leading to increases in follicle-stimulating hormone and loss of the menstrual cycle, accompanied by decreased estradiol production and typical symptoms. The role of hormone therapy in menopause has shifted from preventive use to a limited role in symptom management, for which it remains the most effective intervention. There is good evidence from observational and randomized trials of an increased risk of breast cancer in women on estrogen plus a progestin, compared with those on estrogen alone. There are insufficient data to be able to determine if there are clinically important differences between various progestins and progesterone with respect to breast cancer risk, nor between different regimens. Even relatively short-term exposure to unopposed estrogen will increase the risk of atypical endometrial hyperplasia or cancer; women who have their uterus should be using a progestational agent. Lifestyle changes at menopause are important and effective for preventive health. Recent evidence suggests that the discordance between epidemiologic studies with respect to cardiovascular outcomes and the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial (WHI RCT) data might be attributable in large part to the older age of women enrolled in the WHI.

Chemoprevention of breast cancer: tamoxifen, raloxifene, and beyond

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death among women in the United States. While nonrandomized studies have reported that prophylactic mastectomy or oophorectomy can significantly reduce the risk of breast cancer, these approaches are unacceptable to the majority of women. Chemoprevention, which is defined as the prevention of cancer by pharmacological agents that inhibit or reverse the process of carcinogenesis, has thus increasingly become the focus of breast cancer prevention efforts. The first-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) tamoxifen is the only US Food and Drug Administration- approved drug for breast cancer prevention and reduces the risk of breast cancer by as much as 50% in high-risk women. Raloxifene, a second-generation SERM, also has demonstrated efficacy for breast cancer prevention and is being compared with tamoxifen in a large randomized trial that has recently completed accrual. The aromatase inhibitors (AIs) decrease the incidence of contralateral breast cancer when used in the adjuvant setting and are being evaluated in ongoing primary prevention studies. In addition, a number of novel agents, including antiinflammatory drugs and retinoid derivatives, which appear to be of promise based on preclinical and epidemiological data, are under investigation. Several important challenges remain, including determination of the appropriate dose and duration of treatment when used in the primary prevention setting and development of new research models using surrogate end points for breast cancer incidence and mortality to permit more rapid clinical application of promising new agents.

The impact of cytochrome P450 2D6 metabolism in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen

BACKGROUND

Tamoxifen is biotransformed to the potent anti-estrogen, endoxifen, by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 enzyme. CYP2D6 genetic variation and inhibitors of the enzyme markedly reduce endoxifen plasma concentrations in tamoxifen-treated patients. Using a North Central Cancer Treatment Group adjuvant tamoxifen trial, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of CYP2D6 metabolism by assessing the combined effect of genetic variation and inhibition of the enzyme system on breast cancer recurrence and death.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed at each randomizing site to determine whether CYP2D6 inhibitors were co-prescribed with tamoxifen. Extensive metabolizers were defined as patients without a *4 allele (i.e., wt/wt) who were not co-prescribed a CYP2D6 inhibitor. Patients with decreased CYP2D6 metabolism were classified as intermediate or poor metabolizers (PM) based on the presence of one or two CYP2D6*4 alleles or the co-administration of a moderate or potent CYP2D6 inhibitor. The association between CYP2D6 metabolism and clinical outcome was assessed using Cox modeling.

RESULTS

Medication history was available in 225/256 eligible patients and CYP2D6*4 genotype in 190 patients. Thirteen patients (6%) were co-prescribed a CYP2D6 inhibitor [potent (n = 3), moderate (n = 10)], resulting in the following CYP2D6 metabolism: extensive (n = 115) and decreased (n = 65). In the multivariate analysis, patients with decreased metabolism had significantly shorter time to recurrence (p = 0.034; adj HR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.05-3.45) and worse relapse-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.017; adj HR = 1.74; 1.10-2.74); relative to patients with extensive metabolism. Cox' modeling demonstrated that compared to extensive metabolizers, PM had the most significant risk of breast cancer relapse (HR 3.12, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

CYP2D6 metabolism, as measured by genetic variation and enzyme inhibition, is an independent predictor of breast cancer outcome in post-menopausal women receiving tamoxifen for early breast cancer. Determination of CYP2D6 genotype may be of value in selecting adjuvant hormonal therapy and it appears CYP2D6 inhibitors should be avoided in tamoxifen-treated women.

Interethnic differences in genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 in the U.S. population: clinical implications

DNA polymorphisms have been identified in the genes encoding a number of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, leading to wide interindividual variation in drug clearance. CYP2D6 metabolizes a significant number of clinically used medications, and genetic variants of the CYP2D6 isozyme that result in varying levels of metabolic activity are of clinical importance in some settings. The exact nature of the clinical effect caused by polymorphisms of the gene depends on the drug in question and the specific variant alleles expressed, as individual variants result in differing phenotypes with a range of levels of enzymatic activity. Compromised drug efficacy due to CYP2D6 variation has been documented with a variety of agents, and this review considers a number of examples, including the 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists, which are used in oncology supportive care for the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting. CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism of all of the most commonly available agents, except granisetron, and their efficacy and side effects may therefore be affected by the CYP2D6 polymorphism. Significant interethnic differences in CYP2D6 allele frequencies have been demonstrated from studies across many countries. However, incidences of polymorphisms in the U.S. population have been challenging to characterize because of the country's wide ethnic diversity. The CYP2D6 polymorphism may become more important as robust clinical tests become widely available and as the use of multiple medications and the attendant risk for drug-drug interactions increases.

The AmpliChip CYP450 genotyping test: Integrating a new clinical tool

The AmpliChip CYP450 Test, which analyzes patient genotypes for cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, is a major step toward introducing personalized prescribing into the clinical environment. Interest in adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the genetic revolution, and pharmacogenetics have converged with the introduction of this tool, which is anticipated to be the first of a new wave of such tools to follow over the next 5-10 years. The AmpliChip CYP450 Test is based on microarray technology, which combines hybridization in precise locations on a glass microarray and a fluorescent labeling system. It classifies individuals into two CYP2C19 phenotypes (extensive metabolizers [EMs] and poor metabolizers [PMs]) by testing three alleles, and into four CYP2D6 phenotypes (ultrarapid metabolizers [UMs], EMs, intermediate metabolizers [IMs], and PMs) by testing 27 alleles, including seven duplications. CYP2D6 is a metabolic enzyme with four activity levels (or phenotypes): UMs with unusually high activity; normal subjects, known as EMs; IMs with low activity; and PMs with no CYP2D6 activity (7% of Caucasians and 1-3% in other ethnic groups). Levels of evidence for the association between CYP2D6 PMs and ADRs are relatively reasonable and include systematic reviews of case-control studies of some typical antipsychotics and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). Evidence for other phenotypes is considerably more limited. The CYP2D6 PM phenotype may be associated with risperidone ADRs and discontinuation due to ADRs. Venlafaxine, aripiprazole, duloxetine, and atomoxetine are newer drugs metabolized by CYP2D6 but studies of the clinical relevance of CYP2D6 genotypes are needed. Non-psychiatric drugs metabolized by CYP2D6 include metoprolol, tamoxifen, and codeine-like drugs. CYP2C19 PMs (3-4% of Caucasians and African Americans, and 14-21% of Asians) may require dose adjustment for some TCAs, moclobemide, and citalopram. Other drugs metabolized by CYP2C19 are diazepam and omeprazole. The future of pharmacogenetics depends on the ability to overcome serious obstacles, including the difficulties of conducting and publishing studies in light of resistance from grant agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and some scientific reviewers. Assuming more studies are published, pharmacogenetic clinical applications may be compromised by economic factors and the lack of physician education. The combination of a US FDA-approved test, such as the AmpliChip CYP450 Test, and an FDA definition of CYP2D6 as a 'valid biomarker' makes CYP2D6 genotyping a prime candidate to be the first successful pharmacogenetic test in the clinical environment. One can use microarray technology to test for hundreds of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) but, taking into account the difficulties for single gene approaches such as CYP2D6, it is unlikely that very complex pharmacogenetic approaches will reach the clinical market in the next 5-10 years.

Hot flash therapies in breast cancer survivors

More than 86% of those diagnosed with invasive breast cancer are expected to survive for >/= 5 years after their diagnosis. Approximately 75% of postmenopausal women who had breast cancer report experiencing hot flashes. More than 90% of young survivors also experience hot flashes, which can be more severe and long lasting, with iatrogenic ovarian ablation or antiestrogen therapy. There are numerous options for the treatment of hot flashes. Not one treatment fits all. Some treatments are generally more effective than others, and each has different side effects. This review is meant to provide the basic information needed to make a decision about the best treatment for a breast survivor experiencing hot flashes.

Influence of hormone replacement therapy on tamoxifen-induced vasomotor symptoms

PURPOSE

Tamoxifen is an effective drug, but its role in prevention is limited by its adverse effect profile. Non-life-threatening adverse effects, such as vasomotor symptoms, have an important influence in its use for prevention. Vasomotor symptoms were evaluated according to follow-up time, severity, and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in a retrospective analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study-I study, 7,154 women at increased risk of breast cancer were randomly assigned to either tamoxifen 20 mg/d or placebo for 5 years. Women gave detailed information on any vasomotor symptoms at each 6-month follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Hot flushes were reported more often in the tamoxifen group than in the placebo group (70.6% v 57.1%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.63 to 1.99). Severe hot flushes were more strongly related to tamoxifen. In the tamoxifen arm, more women taking HRT at entry experienced hot flushes in the first 6 months than those who did not take HRT (60.8% v 49.2%, respectively; P = .09). In contrast, women on placebo taking HRT at entry experienced fewer hot flushes than women who stopped HRT (22.9% v 34.3%, respectively; P = .03). Furthermore, for women who first began HRT in the first 6 months of the trial compared with women who did not begin HRT, HRT seemed to be much more effective in controlling hot flushes in months 6 to 12 in the placebo arm (47.9% v 20.4%, respectively) than in the tamoxifen arm (51.4% v 39.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HRT use at entry or during the trial was not effective in alleviating hot flushes for women in the tamoxifen arm. Our retrospective study suggests that estrogen-based HRT has limited effectiveness among women receiving tamoxifen.

Antidepressant use in ambulatory cancer patients

Antidepressants are among the most commonly used medications, and they are frequently prescribed for cancer patients. Several dozen antidepressants are available, and they work through at least seven distinct mechanisms. These agents are used primarily to treat depressive and anxiety symptoms and have proven efficacy in treating hot flashes and as adjuvant analgesics. Side effects and drug interactions are frequent with these agents, and proper assessment and monitoring are crucial.

Drug interactions in cancer therapy

Drug interactions in oncology are of particular importance owing to the narrow therapeutic index and the inherent toxicity of anticancer agents. Interactions with other medications can cause small changes in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a chemotherapy agent that could significantly alter its efficacy or toxicity. Improvements in in vitro methods and early clinical testing have made the prediction of potentially clinically significant drug interactions possible. We outline the types of drug interaction that occur in oncology, the mechanisms that underlie these interactions and describe select examples.

The role of pharmacogenetics in cancer therapeutics

The variability in treatment responses and narrow therapeutic index of anticancer drugs are some of the key challenges oncologists face. The knowledge of pharmacogenetics can potentially aid in the discovery, development and ultimately individualization of anticancer drugs. The identification of genetic variations that predict for drug response is the first step towards the translation of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice. This review provides an update on the results of studies assessing the effects of germline polymorphisms and somatic mutations on therapeutic outcomes and highlights the potential applications and future challenges in pharmacogenetic research pertaining to cancer therapeutics.

The role of genetic variability in drug metabolism pathways in breast cancer prognosis

Among patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, there is variability in treatment outcomes, and it is unclear which patients will receive the most benefit from treatment and which will have better disease-free survival. To date, most studies of breast cancer prognosis have focused on tumor characteristics, but it is likely that pharmacogenetics, genetic variability in the metabolism of therapeutic agents, also plays a role in the prediction of survival. In this paper, we briefly discuss the metabolic pathways of drugs commonly used for the treatment of breast cancer (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, taxanes, tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors) and describe the known genetic variants that may impact those pathways. Studies that have evaluated potential effects of these genetic variants on treatment outcomes are also discussed. It is likely that the application of pharmacogenetics, particularly in the setting of randomized clinical trials, will contribute to findings that may result in individualized therapeutic dosing.

Symptoms and Treatment in Cancer Therapy‐Induced Early Menopause

Young women with breast cancer often experience early menopause as a result of the therapy for their malignant disease. The sudden occurrence of menopause resulting from chemotherapy, oophorectomy, radiation, or gonadal dysgenesis frequently results in hot flashes that begin at a younger age and may occur at a greater frequency and intensity than hot flashes associated with natural menopause. Hormone therapy relieves symptoms effectively in 80%-90% of women who initiate treatment. This therapy, however, is generally contraindicated in estrogen-dependent cancers, such as breast cancer, because of the potentially increased risk for recurrence. Many agents have been investigated as potential means for alleviating hot flashes in survivors of breast cancer, such as progestagens, clonidine, gabapentin, and anti-depressants. Several complementary and alternative medicines frequently used by patients have also been studied. These include black cohosh, phytoestrogens, homeopathy, vitamin E, acupuncture, and behavior strategies. To support the use of one of more of these nonpharmacological or pharmacological options in the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer patients, more evidence from well-controlled clinical trials is needed. In particular, soundly based scientific research with complementary and alternative medicine therapies is lacking. Pharmacological treatments appear to be more beneficial than nonpharmacological treatments. This article reviews the current literature to assess the epidemiology and diagnosis of hot flashes and the nonpharmacological and pharmacological options for the treatment of hot flashes, in breast cancer patients in particular. When specific treatment options have not been evaluated in breast cancer patients specifically, published data on the management of hot flashes with this modality in healthy postmenopausal women are described.

IN SILICO PREDICTION OF DRUG BINDING TO CYP2D6: IDENTIFICATION OF A NEW METABOLITE OF METOCLOPRAMIDE

Patients with cancer often take many different classes of drugs to treat the effects of their malignancy and the side effects of treatment, as well as their comorbidities. The potential for drug-drug interactions that may affect the efficacy of anticancer treatment is high, and a major source of such interactions is competition for the drug-metabolizing enzymes, cytochromes P450 (P450s). We have examined a series of 20 drugs commonly prescribed to cancer patients to look for potential interactions via CYP2D6. We used a homology model of CYP2D6, together with molecular docking techniques, to perform an in silico screen for binding to CYP2D6. Experimental IC50 values were determined for these compounds and compared with the model predictions to reveal a correlation with a regression coefficient of r2= 0.61. Importantly, the docked conformation of the commonly prescribed antiemetic metoclopramide predicted a new site of metabolism that was further investigated through in vitro analysis with recombinant CYP2D6. An aromatic N-hydroxy metabolite of metoclopramide, consistent with predictions from our modeling studies, was identified by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. This metabolite was found to represent a major product of metabolism in human liver microsomes, and CYP2D6 was identified as the main P450 isoform responsible for catalyzing its formation. In view of the prevalence of interindividual variation in the CYP2D6 genotype and phenotype, we suggest that those experiencing adverse reactions with metoclopramide, e.g., extrapyramidal syndrome, are likely to have a particular CYP2D6 genotype/phenotype. This warrants further investigation.

Endoxifen, a secondary metabolite of tamoxifen, and 4-OH-tamoxifen induce similar changes in global gene expression patterns in MCF-7 breast cancer cells

We recently demonstrated that endoxifen (4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen), a pharmacogenetically regulated metabolite of tamoxifen, is equipotent to 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (4-OH-Tam) with respect to estrogen receptor binding and inhibition of 17beta-estradiol (E2)-induced cell proliferation. Endoxifen was also found to be more abundant in human plasma than 4-OH-Tam, and its formation has been shown to be primarily catalyzed by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). Here, we report studies evaluating the effects of endoxifen, 4-OH-Tam, and E2 on gene expression in MCF-7 cells using Affymetrix U133A GeneChip Arrays (Santa Clara, CA). We detected 4062 genes that were E2-regulated (1924 induced; 2138 suppressed), and the ratio of E2-induced versus E2-suppressed genes was consistent regardless of the cutoff value. In the presence of E2, 2444 and 2390 genes were affected by 4-OH-Tam and endoxifen, respectively, when no minimal -fold change cutoff was implemented. The majority of genes regulated by the tamoxifen metabolites were also E2-responsive (74.4 and 73.3%, respectively). Endoxifen and 4-OH-Tam had overlapping effects on 1365 E2-sensitive genes, whose -fold effects between these metabolites were highly correlated (R2 = 0.99). A significant correlation was also found between the -fold effects of 249 E2-insensitive genes coregulated by both metabolites (R2 = 0.99). Hierarchical clustering analysis demonstrated similar gene regulation patterns between these metabolites, which were distinct from E2 or vehicle treatment patterns. Using real time-polymerase chain reaction, we validated the gene expression patterns of five genes that were differentially regulated by endoxifen and 4-OH-Tam. We conclude that endoxifen and 4-OH-Tam have similar effects on global gene expression patterns in MCF-7 cells and that the majority of the affected genes are estrogen-regulated genes.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of sertraline (Zoloft) for the treatment of hot flashes in women with early stage breast cancer taking tamoxifen

We observed the relief of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors taking tamoxifen and treated with sertraline for depression. Our objective was to assess the effect of sertraline on the frequency and severity of hot flashes, mood status, and health-related quality of life. We used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study using 6 weeks of sertraline (50 mg each morning) versus placebo. Study participants were 62 breast cancer survivors from an oncology clinic in a tertiary care center on adjuvant tamoxifen reporting bothersome hot flashes. Patients were asked to keep a daily hot flash diary to record hot flash frequency and severity, from which hot flash scores (frequency x severity) were calculated. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression scale and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--Breast (FACT-B) (at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks) were used to assess mood and quality of life. Sixty-two women were accrued. Forty-seven women (median age 53.9 years, range 36.6-77.1 years; 89% postmenopausal; 85.5% Caucasian) completed the first 6 weeks and 39 completed 12 weeks. The baseline daily hot flash frequency and score were 5.8 (standard deviation 4.1) and 11.5 (14.0), respectively. At the end of the first 6 weeks, hot flash frequency decreased by 50% in 36% of those taking sertraline compared to 27% taking placebo. In the crossover analysis, sertraline was significantly more effective than placebo: women crossing from placebo to sertraline had a decrease (-0.9 and -1.7) in hot flash frequency and score, whereas those crossing from sertraline to placebo had an increase (1.5 and 3.4) in hot flash frequency and score (p = 0.03 and 0.03). Forty-eight percent preferred the sertraline period, 11% preferred the placebo period, and 41% had no preference (p = 0.006). Measures of depression and quality of life were within normal range and did not change significantly within treatment groups. Sertraline decreases hot flashes in breast cancer survivors taking tamoxifen and women prefer sertraline to placebo. Further study of sertraline for the management of hot flashes is warranted.

Cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetics and cancer

The cytochromes P450 (CYPs) are key enzymes in cancer formation and cancer treatment. They mediate the metabolic activation of numerous precarcinogens and participate in the inactivation and activation of anticancer drugs. Since all CYPs that metabolize xenobiotics are polymorphic, much emphasis has been put on the investigation of a relationship between the distribution of specific variant CYP alleles and risk for different types of cancer, but a consistent view does not yet exist. This is to a great extent explained by the fact that the CYPs involved in activation of precarcinogens are in general not functionally polymorphic. This is in contrast to CYPs that are active in drug biotransformation where large interindividual differences in the capacity to metabolize therapeutic drugs are seen as a consequence of polymorphic alleles with altered function. This includes also some anticancer drugs like tamoxifen and cyclophosphamide metabolized by CYP2D6, CYP2C19 and CYP2B6. Some P450 forms are also selectively expressed in tumours, and this could provide a mechanism for drug resistance, but also future therapies using these enzymes as drug targets can be envisioned. This review gives an up-to-date description of our current knowledge in these areas.

In vitro methods in human drug biotransformation research: implications for cancer chemotherapy

Anticancer drugs have a complex pharmacological and toxicological profile with a narrow therapeutic index. It is therefore critical to understand the factors that contribute to the marked intersubject variability in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics often observed with anticancer compounds. Since hepatic and extra-hepatic drug metabolism represents a major drug disposition pathway, extensive efforts are made to thoroughly investigate metabolism of anticancer compounds during the pre-clinical and clinical development phases as well as to address issues encountered during the clinical use of an approved drug. In recent years there has been a significant paradigm shift in pre-clinical/non-clinical drug metabolism studies. Most importantly, this has included a reduced reliance on animal models and increased use of human tissues (i.e. human liver microsomes and other cellular fractions, primary culture of human hepatocytes, cDNA expressed human-specific enzymes and cell-based reporter assays). Typically, experiments are performed using these tools to identify the phase I and/or phase II enzymes involved in metabolism of the drug/investigational agent and for metabolic fingerprinting. Additionally, issues pertaining to the rate, extent and mechanism(s) of the inhibition or induction of the metabolic pathways are also investigated. These studies provide important clues about various aspects of the disposition of a therapeutic agent including first-pass metabolism, elimination half-life, overall bioavailability and the potential for drug-drug interactions. The methodologies used for in vitro assessment of drug metabolism and their applications to drug development and clinical therapeutics with special emphasis on anticancer drugs are reviewed in this manuscript.

Pharmacogenetics of tamoxifen biotransformation is associated with clinical outcomes of efficacy and hot flashes

PURPOSE

Polymorphisms in tamoxifen metabolizing genes affect the plasma concentration of tamoxifen metabolites, but their effect on clinical outcome is unknown.

METHODS

We determined cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6 (*4 and *6) and CYP3A5 (*3) genotype from paraffin-embedded tumor samples and buccal cells (living patients) in tamoxifen-treated women enrolled onto a North Central Cancer Treatment Group adjuvant breast cancer trial. The relationship between genotype and disease outcome was determined using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Paraffin blocks were obtained from 223 of 256 eligible patients, and buccal cells were obtained from 17 living women. CYP2D6 (*4 and *6) and CYP3A5 (*3) genotypes were determined from 190, 194, and 205 patient samples and in 17 living women. The concordance rate between buccal and tumor genotype was 100%. Women with the CYP2D6 *4/*4 genotype had worse relapse-free time (RF-time; P = .023) and disease-free survival (DFS; P = .012), but not overall survival (P = .169) and did not experience moderate to severe hot flashes relative to women heterozygous or homozygous for the wild-type allele. In the multivariate analysis, women with the CYP2D6 *4/*4 genotype still tended to have worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; P = .176) and DFS (HR, 1.86; P = .089). The CYP3A5*3 variant was not associated with any of these clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In tamoxifen-treated patients, women with the CYP2D6 *4/*4 genotype tend to have a higher risk of disease relapse and a lower incidence of hot flashes, which is consistent with our previous observation that CYP2D6 is responsible for the metabolic activation of tamoxifen to endoxifen.

The role of drug-metabolising enzymes in clinical responses to chemotherapy

Interindividual differences in efficacy and toxicity of cancer chemotherapy are especially important given the narrow therapeutic index of these drugs. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to chemotherapy are difficult to predict in a particular patient as numerous variables (e.g., age, gender, concomitant medications and concomitant illness) can alter drug responses. Inherited variations in genes involved in drug metabolism have also been shown to contribute to altered responses to cancer treatment. There are several clinically relevant examples of genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolising enzymes that alter outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy agents. It may be possible to predict a patient's response to a particular chemotherapy agent based on knowledge of their genetic composition through in vivo phenotyping of drug-metabolising enzymes.

Pharmacogenetics of drug-metabolizing enzymes: implications for a safer and more effective drug therapy

The majority of phase I- and phase II-dependent drug metabolism is carried out by polymorphic enzymes which can cause abolished, quantitatively or qualitatively decreased or enhanced drug metabolism. Several examples exist where subjects carrying certain alleles do not benefit from drug therapy due to ultrarapid metabolism caused by multiple genes or by induction of gene expression or, alternatively, suffer from adverse effects of the drug treatment due to the presence of defective alleles. It is likely that future predictive genotyping for such enzymes might benefit 15-25% of drug treatments, and thereby allow prevention of adverse drug reactions and causalities, and thus improve the health of a significant fraction of the patients. However, it will take time before this will be a reality within the clinic. We describe some important aspects in the field with emphasis on cytochrome P450 and discuss also polymorphic aspects of foetal expression of CYP3A5 and CYP3A7.

Hot flushes in breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

A literature search was conducted to gather information concerning the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to hot flushes, their prevalence and severity in breast cancer patients, their influence on quality of life, and the best therapeutic option.

METHODS

Relevant studies in English were selected from Medline.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to hot flushes are poorly understood. Estrogen withdrawal is considered to have a central role. Also, serotonin and norepinephrine seem to be involved in hot flush induction. Menopause induced by chemotherapy or ovarian ablation, is accompanied by an abrupt decrease in estrogen level, causing vasomotor symptoms. Hot flushes are also a side effect of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. Quality of life in breast cancer patients may be negatively influenced by hot flushes, and therefore, adequate treatment is important. Currently, of the several non-hormonal options, the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) venlafaxine is the most effective in breast cancer patients. However, studies on interaction between SSRIs and tamoxifen may influence future recommendations.

Genotyping and phenotyping cytochrome P450: Perspectives for cancer treatment

As most anticancer agents display a narrow therapeutic window, patients may be susceptible to (extreme) toxicities or a lowered therapeutic outcome if not dosed adequately. Therefore, it is important to study factors which affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs. Among these, the contribution of genetic variation in drug metabolizing enzymes on the metabolism of anticancer agents has gathered interest, as it may potentially explain a substantial amount of interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics and drug response. Cytochrome P450, an oxidative enzyme-system involved in the breakdown of many drugs, is currently studied for correlations between genetic polymorphisms and anticancer drug metabolism. Also, alternative ways to predict the expression of cytochrome P450 have been developed (phenotyping measures) which may have additional value in creating a lowered interpatient variability, to minimize side-effects and maximize therapeutic efficacy.

Serotonergic Agents as an Alternative to Hormonal Therapy for the Treatment of Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms

Hot flashes represent one of the most common complaints among women undergoing menopause. Despite their prevalence, the pathophysiology leading to hot flashes is only partly understood. Short-term estrogen remains the most effective treatment for hot flashes, but because of safety concerns many women are reluctant to use this treatment. Several non-hormonal pharmacologic treatments have been evaluated in randomized, prospective clinical trials. Placebo-controlled clinical trials have suggested that agents from the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) family reduce hot flashes by 50-60%. Successful treatment of hot flashes with these compounds may also be associated with improvements in sleep, mental health, and vitality. Adverse events may cause 10-20% of individuals to withdraw from treatment. The agents should be stopped with caution to prevent a discontinuation syndrome. Given the available data, the North American Menopause Society and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have recommended that women with moderate to severe, menopause-related hot flashes, with concerns or contraindications to estrogen-containing treatments, should consider prescription progestogens, venlafaxine, paroxetine, fluoxetine, or gabapentin. Prescribing clinicians are urged to discuss the potential benefits, adverse effects, and new information that may become available for each of the treatment options. Caution should also be exercised when prescribing strong cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitors, such as paroxetine or fluoxetine, to women who are taking tamoxifen. Further studies are required to evaluate the optimal agent and duration of SSRI/SNRI treatment in menopausal women.

The impact of risk status, preexisting morbidity, and polypharmacy on treatment decisions concerning menopausal symptoms

Because each menopausal treatment has a unique benefit-risk profile, deciding whether menopausal hormone therapy (HT) or another menopausal treatment is appropriate for an individual requires assessing the risks and benefits of each treatment as well as determining the patient's risk factors, comorbidities, and current medications. Simple summary metrics for assessing net treatment effects on multiple outcomes, such as the Women's Health Initiative's (WHI) global index, are not necessarily generalizable beyond the study population in which they were derived. However, trial evidence can be translated to individual decisions by transforming relative risks into absolute risks. The validity of generalizing relative risks found in clinical trials to groups with differing baseline risks depends on the homogeneity of relative risks across various risk strata. Subgroup analyses from the major clinical studies of HT found its relative risks for cardiovascular disease, hip fracture, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and ovarian cancer to be relatively uniform across strata defined by age, race/ethnicity, antecedent risk status, or prior disease. The number of significant subgroup findings in these studies tended to match the number expected by chance alone. However, data are limited for many subgroups, especially those with comorbidities. Strata defined by the concurrent use of drugs that can interact with HT are not expected to be homogeneous, yet data on drug interactions are limited. More data are needed about the effects of menopausal treatments in diverse populations, and more attention is needed to translate this evidence into clinical practice and to develop tools to support informed decision making.

Centrally active nonhormonal hot flash therapies

Given the problems associated with hormonal therapy, and the prominent problem of hot flashes in menopausal women, there is a need for nonhormonal agents to alleviate hot flashes. Several compounds that appear to act on the central nervous system have been investigated. Potential mechanisms for their effects on hot flashes have been described. Bellergal (no longer available on the US market, where it was known as Bellergal-S), a combination preparation sedative that consists of low-dose phenobarbital, ergotamine tartrate, and levorotatory alkaloids of belladonna, is an old agent that was popular approximately 20 years ago; however, there is limited suggestion of efficacy for this agent. Clonidine, an older antihypertensive drug, is another centrally active agent that has been studied. Randomized trials have demonstrated that it clearly works for reducing hot flashes, but the magnitude of efficacy is somewhat limited. Toxicity from this agent limits its utility in the clinic. Methyldopa is another centrally active agent that has been studied but to a more limited degree. It appears to have minimal efficacy and too much toxicity to make it clinically useful. Anecdotal observations from a number of sources suggested that newer antidepressants can alleviate hot flashes. This led to pilot trials of venlafaxine and paroxetine, with results suggesting benefit from both drugs. Subsequently, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials of venlafaxine, paroxetine, and fluoxetine were conducted. All 3 of these clinical trials demonstrated statistically significant reductions in hot flashes with these newer antidepressants compared with placebo. Pilot trials of citalopram and mirtazapine, 2 other newer antidepressants, have also suggested efficacy. Toxicity evaluations have suggested that these agents are, again, well tolerated by the majority of patients. A recent trial, however, was unable to demonstrate any benefit for fluoxetine or citalopram over a placebo. Anecdotal observations also suggested that gabapentin was helpful for alleviating hot flashes. This led to pilot trials that again suggested efficacy. Subsequently, 2 large placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind clinical trials were conducted. Both of these demonstrated statistically significant efficacy for gabapentin compared with a placebo. This drug is relatively well tolerated by most patients. Thus, centrally active nonhormonal agents clearly do decrease hot flashes in women. The most efficacious and clinically appropriate agents for use are newer antidepressants and gabapentin. Continued evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity of these agents is ongoing.

Combination vinorelbine and capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer using a non-body surface area dosing scheme

PURPOSE

This study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose of flat-dosed vinorelbine in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. At the time of study initiation, it was anticipated that vinorelbine would be developed as an oral capsule. A flat dosing scheme of both drugs was used to facilitate development of the oral regimen, and because neither drug's clearance is associated with body surface area (BSA), pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic endpoints were explored.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Capecitabine was administered orally at 3,000 mg/day on days 1-14. The starting dose of vinorelbine was 20 mg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The vinorelbine dose was escalated until dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Vinorelbine pharmacokinetics were measured after the first dose. Patients underwent genotype analysis for polymorphisms in the CYP3A5 gene, and the erythromycin breath test (ERMBT), a phenotypic test of CYP3A enzyme activity.

RESULTS

Twenty five eligible patients were enrolled. Hematologic DLT was seen at the 50 and 45 mg vinorelbine doses; thus the recommended dose is 40 mg on days 1 and 8. Response rate was 30%, and disease stabilization rate was 64% (all dose levels included). Vinorelbine clearance was not associated with ERMBT, BSA, or age. CYP3A5 genotype in this small sample did not have an obvious relationship to clearance or toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

A non-BSA based dosing scheme of capecitabine and vinorelbine is safe and efficacious. BSA did not affect vinorelbine clearance. We recommend future studies with capecitabine and/or vinorelbine to compare the safety and efficacy of flat dosed versus BSA-dosed treatment.

Modulation of cytochrome P450 activity: implications for cancer therapy

Although metabolism mediated by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes is known to play a major part in the biotransformation of anticancer agents in vivo, few clinical studies have investigated activity of cytochrome P450s and therapeutic outcome in people with cancer. Variability between individuals in the pharmacokinetics of cancer chemotherapy has important consequences in terms of therapeutic efficacy and safety. We discuss here the effect of drug metabolism mediated by cytochrome P450 on therapeutic outcome. As examples, the biotransformation pathways of cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, tamoxifen, docetaxel, paclitaxel, and irinotecan are discussed. Since most anticancer agents are transformed by enzymes, better knowledge of their metabolic pathways could help improve treatment outcome and safety. Furthermore, a more complete understanding of the metabolism of anticancer agents through phenotyping and genotyping approaches will facilitate the prediction of interactions between drugs. More clinical evidence is needed on the metabolic transformation and drug interactions with these agents to improve cancer therapeutics.

Cancer treatment and pharmacogenetics of cytochrome P450 enzymes

For the treatment of cancer, the window between drug toxicity and suboptimal therapy is often narrow. Interindividual variation in drug metabolism therefore complicates therapy. Genetic polymorphisms in phase I and phase II enzymes may explain part of the observed interindividual variation in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs. The cytochrome P450 superfamily is involved in many drug metabolizing reactions. Information on variant alleles for the different isoenzymes of this family, encoding proteins with decreased enzymatic activity, is rapidly growing. The ultimate goal of ongoing research on these enzymes would be to enable pharmacogenetic screening prior to anticancer therapy. At this moment, potential clinically relevant application of CYP450 pharmacogenetics for anticancer therapy may be found for CYP1A2 and flutamide, CYP2A6 and tegafur, CYP2B6 and cyclophosphamide, CYP2C8 and paclitaxel, CYP2D6 and tamoxifen, and CYP3A5. For this latter enzyme, the drugs of interest still need to be identified.

Paroxetine Is an Effective Treatment for Hot Flashes: Results From a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose

In an open-label trial we have previously demonstrated that paroxetine reduces hot flashes. We initiated a stratified, randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of paroxetine 10 mg and 20 mg compared to placebo in reducing hot flash frequency and composite score. A secondary objective was to evaluate quality of life (QOL) parameters.

Patients and Methods

Women who suffered at least two hot flashes a day for 1 month or longer were eligible. Women were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of paroxetine 10 mg or 20 mg followed by placebo for 4 weeks, or placebo for 4 weeks followed by paroxetine 10 mg or 20 mg for 4 weeks. Participants completed baseline daily hot flash diaries for one week prior to the start of the study and throughout the study, and QOL questionnaires at baseline, week 5 and week 9.

Results

279 women were screened, and 151 were randomly assigned. Paroxetine 10 mg reduced hot flash frequency and composite score by 40.6% and 45.6%, respectively, compared to 13.7% and 13.7% for placebo (P = .0006 and P = .0008, respectively). Paroxetine 20 mg reduced hot flash frequency and composite score by 51.7% and 56.1%, respectively, compared with 26.6% and 28.8% for placebo (P = .002 and P = .004, respectively). Efficacy was similar between the two doses, but women were less likely to discontinue low-dose paroxetine. Paroxetine 10 mg was associated with a significant improvement in sleep compared with placebo (P = .01).

Conclusion

Paroxetine is an effective treatment for hot flashes in women with or without a prior breast cancer.

Gabapentin for hot flashes in 420 women with breast cancer: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Most women receiving systemic therapy for breast cancer experience hot flashes. We undertook a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-institutional trial to assess the efficacy of gabapentin in controlling hot flashes in women with breast cancer.

METHODS

420 women with breast cancer who were having two or more hot flashes per day were randomly assigned placebo, gabapentin 300 mg/day, or gabapentin 900 mg/day by mouth in three divided doses for 8 weeks. Each patient kept a 1-week, self-report diary on the frequency, severity, and duration of hot flashes before the start of the study and during weeks 4 and 8 of treatment. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Evaluable data were available on 371 participants at 4 weeks (119 placebo, 123 gabapentin 300 mg, and 129 gabapentin 900 mg) and 347 at 8 weeks (113 placebo, 114 gabapentin 300 mg, and 120 gabapentin 900 mg). The percentage decreases in hot-flash severity score between baseline and weeks 4 and 8, respectively were: 21% (95% CI 12 to 30) and 15% (1 to 29) in the placebo group; 33% (23 to 43) and 31% (16 to 46) in the group assigned gabapentin 300 mg; and 49% (42 to 56) and 46% (34 to 58) in the group assigned gabapentin 900 mg. The differences between the groups were significant (p=0.0001 at 4 weeks and p=0.007 at 8 weeks by ANCOVA for overall treatment effect, adjusted for baseline values); only the higher dose of gabapentin was associated with significant decreases in hot-flash frequency and severity.

INTERPRETATION

Gabapentin is effective in the control of hot flashes at a dose of 900 mg/day, but not at a dose of 300 mg/day. This drug should be considered for treatment of hot flashes in women with breast cancer.

Management of menopausal symptoms in patients with breast cancer: an evidence-based approach

Increasing numbers of women have menopausal symptoms after treatment for breast cancer. These symptoms can result directly from cancer treatments (such as oophorectomy, ovarian suppression, chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, and antioestrogens), as a spontaneous event, or after discontinuation of hormone-replacement therapy. The onset of menopausal symptoms after treatment for breast cancer can have a long-lasting effect on quality of life, body image, sexual function, and self esteem. Hormone-replacement therapy that contains oestrogen is the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms in healthy women. However, evidence from one randomised controlled trial suggests that use of hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer raises the risk of recurrence and of new primary breast cancer. As the incidence of breast cancer increases and survival continues to improve, the number of women with menopausal symptoms will probably rise. Safe and effective non-hormonal treatments for severe menopausal symptoms after breast cancer are urgently needed. Few studies have addressed the management of menopausal symptoms after breast cancer, and the quality of studies is generally poor. Progestagens, and selective inhibitors of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake seem to offer reasonable symptom palliation, but the long-term effectiveness and safety of these preparations is not known. We propose that the management of menopausal symptoms in patients with a history of cancer requires a patient-centred, but multidisciplinary, approach.