Inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by bacteriophage T7 gene 2 protein

Regulated communication between the upstream face of RNA polymerase and the beta' subunit jaw domain

We used bacteriophage T7-encoded transcription inhibitor gene protein 2 (gp2) as a probe to study the contribution of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) beta' subunit jaw domain--the site of gp2 binding--to activator and ATP hydrolysis-dependent open complex formation by the sigma(54)-RNAP. We show that, unlike sigma(70)-dependent transcription, activated transcription by sigma(54)-RNAP is resistant to gp2. In contrast, activator and ATP hydrolysis-independent transcription by sigma(54)-RNAP is highly sensitive to gp2. We provide evidence that an activator- and ATP hydrolysis-dependent conformational change involving the beta' jaw domain and promoter DNA is the basis for gp2-resistant transcription by sigma(54)-RNAP. Our results establish that accessory factors bound to the upstream face of the RNAP, communicate with the beta' jaw domain, and that such communication is subjected to regulation.

P2 growth restriction on an rpoC mutant is suppressed by alleles of the Rz1 homolog lysC

Escherichia coli strain 397c carries a temperature-sensitive mutation, rpoC397, that removes the last 50 amino acids of the RNA polymerase beta' subunit and is nonpermissive for plating of bacteriophage P2. P2 gor mutants productively infect 397c and define a new gene, lysC, encoded by a reading frame that extensively overlaps the P2 lysis accessory gene, lysB. The unusual location of lysC with respect to lysB is reminiscent of the Rz/Rz1 lysis gene pair of phage lambda. Indeed, coexpression of lysB and lysC complemented the growth defect of lambda Rz/Rz1 null mutants, indicating that the LysB/C pair is similar to Rz/Rz1 in both gene arrangement and function. Cells carrying the rpoC397 mutation exhibited an early onset of P2-induced lysis, which was suppressed by the gor mutation in lysC. We propose that changes in host gene expression resulting from the rpoC397 mutation result in changes in the composition of the bacterial cell wall, making the cell more susceptible to P2-mediated lysis and preventing accumulation of progeny phage sufficient for plaque formation.

Highly divergent RfaH orthologs from pathogenic proteobacteria can substitute for Escherichia coli RfaH both in vivo and in vitro

The transcriptional enhancer protein RfaH positively regulates production of virulence factors in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium via a cis element, ops. Genes coding for RfaH orthologs were identified in conceptually translated genomes of bacterial pathogens, including Vibrio and Yersinia spp. We cloned the rfaH genes from Vibrio cholerae, Yersinia enterocolitica, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Klebsiella pneumoniae into E. coli expression vectors. Purified RfaH orthologs, including the most divergent one from V. cholerae, were readily recruited to the E. coli transcription elongation complex. Postrecruitment stimulation of transcript elongation appeared to vary with the degree of similarity to E. coli RfaH. V. cholerae RfaH was particularly defective in reducing downstream pausing and termination; this defect was substantially alleviated by an increase in its concentration. When overexpressed episomally, all of the rfaH genes complemented the disruption of the chromosomal copy of the E. coli gene. Thus, despite the apparently accelerated divergent evolution of the RfaH proteins, the mechanism of their action is conserved well enough to make them transcriptionally active in the E. coli system.

Purification of Rhodobacter sphaeroides RNA polymerase and its sigma factors

This article summarized methods to obtain RNA polymerase and sigma factors that can be used to analyze the in vitro control of gene expression by the facultative phototroph R. sphaeroides. While not a topic of this article, these purified components also allow one to analyze R. sphaeroides promoters that use activators to stimulate transcription. We expect that these approaches will be increasingly useful as investigators continue to dissect the number of unusual signal transduction pathways that control gene expression in this and other related species.

Bacteriophage-induced modifications of host RNA polymerase

Bacteriophages have developed an impressive array of ingenious mechanisms to modify bacterial host RNA polymerase to make it serve viral needs. In this review we summarize the current knowledge about two types of host RNA polymerase modifications induced by double-stranded DNA phages: covalent modifications and modifications through RNA polymerase-binding proteins. We interpret the biochemical and genetic data within the framework of a structure-function model of bacterial RNA polymerase and viral biology.

Antimicrobial drug discovery through bacteriophage genomics

Over evolutionary time bacteriophages have developed unique proteins that arrest critical cellular processes to commit bacterial host metabolism to phage reproduction. Here, we apply this concept of phage-mediated bacterial growth inhibition to antibiotic discovery. We sequenced 26 Staphylococcus aureus phages and identified 31 novel polypeptide families that inhibited growth upon expression in S. aureus. The cellular targets for some of these polypeptides were identified and several were shown to be essential components of the host DNA replication and transcription machineries. The interaction between a prototypic pair, ORF104 of phage 77 and DnaI, the putative helicase loader of S. aureus, was then used to screen for small molecule inhibitors. Several compounds were subsequently found to inhibit both bacterial growth and DNA synthesis. Our results suggest that mimicking the growth-inhibitory effect of phage polypeptides by a chemical compound, coupled with the plethora of phages on earth, will yield new antibiotics to combat infectious diseases.

The genome sequence of Yersinia pestis bacteriophage phiA1122 reveals an intimate history with the coliphage T3 and T7 genomes

The genome sequence of bacteriophage phiA1122 has been determined. phiA1122 grows on almost all isolates of Yersinia pestis and is used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a diagnostic agent for the causative agent of plague. phiA1122 is very closely related to coliphage T7; the two genomes are colinear, and the genome-wide level of nucleotide identity is about 89%. However, a quarter of the phiA1122 genome, one that includes about half of the morphogenetic and maturation functions, is significantly more closely related to coliphage T3 than to T7. It is proposed that the yersiniophage phiA1122 recombined with a close relative of the Y. enterocolitica phage phiYeO3-12 to yield progeny phages, one of which became the classic T3 coliphage of Demerec and Fano (M. Demerec and U. Fano, Genetics 30:119-136, 1945).

Genome of Xanthomonas oryzae bacteriophage Xp10: an odd T-odd phage

Xp10 is a lytic bacteriophage of the phytopathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas oryzae. Though morphologically Xp10 belongs to the Syphoviridae family, it encodes its own single-subunit RNA polymerase characteristic of T7-like phages of the Podoviridae family. Here, we report the determination and analysis of the 44,373 bp sequence of the Xp10 genome. The genome is a linear, double-stranded DNA molecule with 3' cohesive overhangs and no terminal repeats or redundancies. Half of the Xp10 genome contains genes coding for structural proteins and host lysis functions in an arrangement typical for temperate dairy phages that are related to the Escherichia coli lambda phage. The other half of the Xp10 genome contains genes coding for factors of host gene expression shut-off, enzymes of viral genome replication and expression. The two groups of genes are transcribed divergently and separated by a regulatory region, which contains divergent promoters recognized by the host RNA polymerase. Xp10 has apparently arisen through a recombination between genomes of widely different phages. Further evidence of extensive gene flux in the evolution of Xp10 includes a high fraction (10%) of genes derived from an HNH-family endonuclease, and a DNA-dependent DNA polymerase that is closer to a homolog from Leishmania than to DNA polymerases from other phages or bacteria.

The downstream DNA jaw of bacterial RNA polymerase facilitates both transcriptional initiation and pausing

Regulation of RNA polymerase during initiation, elongation, and termination of transcription is mediated in part by interactions with intrinsic regulatory signals encoded in the RNA and DNA that contact the enzyme. These interactions include contacts to an 8-9-bp RNA:DNA hybrid within the active-site cleft of the enzyme, contacts to the melted nontemplate DNA strand in the vicinity of the hybrid, contacts to exiting RNA upstream of the hybrid, and contacts to approximately 20 bp of duplex DNA downstream of the active site. Based on characterization of an amino acid substitution (G1161R) and a deletion (Delta1149-1190) in the jaw domain of the bacterial RNA polymerase largest subunit (beta'), we report here that contacts of the jaw domain to downstream DNA at the leading edge of the transcription complex contribute to regulation during all three phases of transcription. The results provide insight into the role of the jaw domain-downstream DNA contact in transcriptional initiation and pausing and suggest possible explanations for the previously reported isolation of the jaw mutants based on reduced ColEI plasmid replication.

A novel bacteriophage-encoded RNA polymerase binding protein inhibits transcription initiation and abolishes transcription termination by host RNA polymerase

Xp10 is a lytic bacteriophage of Xanthomonas oryzae, a Gram-negative bacterium that causes rice blight. We purified an Xp10 protein, p7, that binds to and inhibits X. oryzae RNA polymerase (RNAP). P7 is a novel 73 amino acid-long protein; it does not bind to and hence does not affect transcription by Escherichia coli RNAP. Analysis of E. coli/X. oryzae RNAP hybrids locates the p7 binding site to the largest X. oryzae RNAP subunit, beta'. Binding of p7 to X. oryzae RNAP holoenzyme prevents large conformational change that places the sigma subunit region 4 into the correct position for interaction with the -35 promoter element. As a result, open promoter complex formation on the -10/-35 class promoters is inhibited. Inhibition of promoter complex formation on the extended -10 class promoters is less efficient. The p7 protein also abolishes factor-independent transcription termination by X. oryzae RNAP by preventing the release of nascent RNA at terminators. Further physiological and mechanistic studies of this novel transcription factor should provide additional insights into its biological role and the processes of promoter recognition and transcription termination.

The Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.anti-sigma 70 AsiA complex utilizes alpha-carboxyl-terminal domain upstream promoter contacts to transcribe from a -10/-35 promoter

During infection of Escherichia coli, the phage T4 early protein AsiA inhibits open complex formation by the RNA polymerase holoenzyme Efinal sigma(70) at -10/-35 bacterial promoters through binding to region 4.2 of the final sigma(70) subunit. We used the -10/-35 lacUV5 promoter to study the properties of the Efinal sigma(70). AsiA complex in the presence of the glutamate anion. Under these experimental conditions, inhibition by AsiA was significantly decreased. KMnO(4) probing showed that the observed residual transcriptional activity was due to the slow transformation of the ternary complex Efinal sigma(70). AsiA.lacUV5 into an open complex. In agreement with this observation, affinity of the enzyme for the promoter was 10-fold lower in the ternary complex than in the binary complex Efinal sigma(70).lacUV5. A tau plot analysis of abortive transcription reactions showed that AsiA binding to Efinal sigma(70) resulted in a 120-fold decrease in the second-order on-rate constant of the reaction of Efinal sigma(70) with lacUV5 and a 55-fold decrease in the rate constant of the isomerization step leading to the open complex. This ternary complex still responded to activation by the cAMP.catabolite activator protein complex. We show that compensatory Efinal sigma(70)/promoter upstream contacts involving the C-terminal domains of alpha subunits in Efinal sigma(70) become essential for the binding of Efinal sigma(70). AsiA to the lacUV5 promoter.

Repression of transcription initiation at 434 P(R) by 434 repressor: effects on transition of a closed to an open promoter complex

The lambdoid bacteriophage repressors function both as transcription activators and repressors. Regulation of transcription at the adjacent, but divergent promoters, P(RM) and P(R), determines the phage's choice between the lytic and lysogenic development pathways. Here, we demonstrate that 434 repressor bound at 434 O(R)1 alone is not sufficient to repress transcription from 434 P(R,) but that 434 repressor bound at 434 O(R)2 alone is necessary and sufficient to repress P(R )transcription. This is different from what occurs in the related bacteriophage lambda, in which binding of lambda repressor to either lambdaO(R)1 or lambdaO(R)2 represses transcription from lambdaP(R). The combined results of gel mobility shift and KMnO(4) footprinting assays show that while 434 repressor binding to 434 O(R)2 does not preclude RNA polymerase binding at the P(R) promoter, it does prevent it from forming open complexes at this promoter. The RNA polymerase-P(R) complexes that form in the presence of repressor are heparin-resistant and the DNA is not melted. This observation indicates that 434 repressor bound at 434 O(R)2 inhibits transcription initiation at the P(R) promoter by "locking" the RNA polymerase-P(R) complex into an inactive state instead of "blocking" the access of RNA polymerase to promoter DNA.

RNA polymerases from Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli differ in recognition of regulatory signals in vitro

Adaptation of bacterial cells to diverse habitats relies on the ability of RNA polymerase to respond to various regulatory signals. Some of these signals are conserved throughout evolution, whereas others are species specific. In this study we present a comprehensive comparative analysis of RNA polymerases from two distantly related bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, using a panel of in vitro transcription assays. We found substantial species-specific differences in the ability of these enzymes to escape from the promoter and to recognize certain types of elongation signals. Both enzymes responded similarly to other pause and termination signals and to the general E. coli elongation factors NusA and GreA. We also demonstrate that, although promoter recognition depends largely on the sigma subunit, promoter discrimination exhibited in species-specific fashion by both RNA polymerases resides in the core enzyme. We hypothesize that differences in signal recognition are due to the changes in contacts made between the beta and beta' subunits and the downstream DNA duplex.

RNA polymerase structure-function: insights into points of transcriptional regulation

The crystal structure of Thermus aquaticus RNA polymerase (RNAP) with 3.3 A resolution has recently been described. The high degree of sequence similarity between T. aquaticus RNAP and the prototypical RNAP from Escherichia coli invites comparison of the new structural data with genetic and biochemical results that defined the interaction sites of E. coli RNAP with transcription regulators.

The interface of sigma with core RNA polymerase is extensive, conserved, and functionally specialized

The sigma subunit of eubacterial RNA polymerase is required throughout initiation, but how it communicates with core polymerase (alpha(2)betabeta') is poorly understood. The present work addresses the location and function of the interface of sigma with core. Our studies suggest that this interface is extensive as mutations in six conserved regions of sigma(70) hinder the ability of sigma to bind core. Direct binding of one of these regions to core can be demonstrated using a peptide-based approach. The same regions, and even equivalent residues, in sigma(32) and sigma(70) alter core interaction, suggesting that sigma(70) family members use homologous residues, at least in part, to interact with core. Finally, the regions of sigma that we identify perform specialized functions, suggesting that different portions of the interface perform discrete roles during transcription initiation.

Transcription activation by catabolite activator protein (CAP)

Transcription activation by Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein (CAP) at each of two classes of simple CAP-dependent promoters is understood in structural and mechanistic detail. At class I CAP-dependent promoters, CAP activates transcription from a DNA site located upstream of the DNA site for RNA polymerase holoenzyme (RNAP); at these promoters, transcription activation involves protein-protein interactions between CAP and the RNAP alpha subunit C-terminal domain that facilitate binding of RNAP to promoter DNA to form the RNAP-promoter closed complex. At class II CAP-dependent promoters, CAP activates transcription from a DNA site that overlaps the DNA site for RNAP; at these promoters, transcription activation involves both: (i) protein-protein interactions between CAP and RNAP alpha subunit C-terminal domain that facilitate binding of RNAP to promoter DNA to form the RNAP-promoter closed complex; and (ii) protein-protein interactions between CAP and RNAP alpha subunit N-terminal domain that facilitates isomerization of the RNAP-promoter closed complex to the RNAP-promoter open complex. Straightforward combination of the mechanisms for transcription activation at class I and class II CAP-dependent promoters permits synergistic transcription activation by multiple molecules of CAP, or by CAP and other activators. Interference with determinants of CAP or RNAP involved in transcription activation at class I and class II CAP-dependent promoters permits "anti-activation" by negative regulators. Basic features of transcription activation at class I and class II CAP-dependent promoters appear to be generalizable to other activators.