Prognostic significance of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer

The impact of bilateral breast cancer on the prognosis of breast cancer: a comparative study with unilateral breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of bilateral breast cancer is unclear and its influence on prognosis is controversial. We assessed the impact of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer on the prognosis compared with unilateral breast cancer.

METHODS

Between January 1, 1960 and December 31, 2001, 1,214 women were treated for primary operable breast cancers. Thirteen (1.1%) had synchronous bilateral breast cancer; 33 (2.7%) had a metachronous contralateral breast cancer. We compared age at operation, menopausal status, clinical stage, tumor size and histology, lymph node status, hormone receptor status, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy or hormone therapy, and we analyzed the impact of these factors on recurrence and survival in the 46 patients with bilateral breast cancer and the 1,168 patients with unilateral breast cancer.

RESULTS

The 5-and 10-year disease-free survival rates, respectively, were 65% and 65% in metachronous cases, 85.7% and 64.3% in synchronous cases, and 77.9% and 72.1% in unilateral cases. There was no significant difference in overall survival among the three groups. On multivariate analysis, metachronous bilaterality, tumor size, lymph node status and adjuvant hormone therapy were each independent risk factors for recurrence, whereas bilaterality of breast cancer did not influence overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that metachronous bilateral breast cancer is associated with shorter disease-free survival than synchronous bilateral or unilateral breast cancer, although overall survival does not differ among the 3 groups. Patients with metachronous bilateral breast cancer should be followed particularly closely in order to detect recurrence early and maximize quality of life.

Morphologically similar epithelial and stromal cells in primary bilateral breast tumors display different genetic profiles: implications for treatment

The morphologic features of primary bilateral breast carcinoma have been well elucidated, but it is not known whether tumors at two sides share a common genetic profile and undergo the same clinical course. To address this issue, morphologically comparable epithelial and stromal cells in 18 paired primary bilateral breast tumors were microdissected and subjected to comparisons for the frequency and pattern of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability (MI), as well as the profiles of comparative genomic hybridization. Of 18 paired bilateral epithelial samples assessed with 10 DNA markers at five chromosomes, 78 altered loci were found; of these, 23 (29.5%) displayed concurrent and 55 (70.5%) showed independent LOH, MI, or both. Of 18 paired bilateral stromal samples assessed with the same markers, 70 altered loci were seen; of these, 9 (12.9%) displayed concurrent and 61 (87.1%) showed independent LOH, MI, or both. Collectively, all the markers and 30 (83.3%) of 36 paired bilateral epithelial and stromal cells displayed significantly more (P < 0.01) independent than concurrent LOH, MI, or both. In contrast, the epithelial cells of a pulmonary small cell carcinoma metastasized to both breasts displayed concurrent LOH at each of the four altered loci. Of seven selected cases for comparative genomic hybridization, six (86%) displayed chromosomal changes, but none showed an identical pattern and frequency of changes in both breasts. The significantly higher rate of independent genetic alterations in morphologically comparable cells of paired bilateral primary breast tumors supports the notion that the development and clinical course of tumors in two sides differ substantially; consequently, different interventions might be needed for the optimal management of bilateral breast tumors.

Phenotypic similarities in bilateral breast cancer

Bilateral breast cancers that develop at similar times in an individual are likely to have been subjected to similar hormonal, environmental and genetic influences during tumourogenesis compared with metachronous tumours. As such, it is possible that tumour phenotype in synchronous bilateral breast cancer may display similar biological characteristics. The aim of this study was to identify phenotypic similarities between synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancers which may suggest a common origin. Thirty-three cases of synchronous and 46 cases of metachronous bilateral breast cancer that displayed similar tumour type were analysed for concordance in relation to various histological and immunohistochemical parameters. A higher level of concordance was demonstrated for synchronous cases with the highest level seen for oestrogen receptor. It is likely that this is related to similar tumourogenic pathways occurring at equivalent exposure times to various environmental and hormonal influences, although, in a proportion of cases, inherited genetic factors may play a role.

Bilateral carcinomas of the breast with local recurrence: analysis of genetic relationship of the tumors

Local recurrence of bilateral breast carcinomas is rare, but of biological interest, since it is unclear as to which tumor the local recurrence is related to, the ipsilateral or the contralateral, or whether it is an independent neoplasm. The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic relationship of bilateral breast carcinomas to each other and to their local recurrences. Eight cases of bilateral breast carcinomas, five with and three without local recurrence were analyzed using a microsatellite assay for 13 microsatellite loci. The presence of loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability in the various tumors was used for clonal analysis. All eight bilateral breast carcinomas showed divergent alterations in at least two microsatellite loci, which ruled out a genetic relationship. Four of five local recurrences were genetically related to the ipsilateral tumor and unrelated to the contralateral tumor. Only one local recurrence that occurred 11.8 years after the surgery of an infiltrative lobular carcinoma simultaneously with distant metastases was genetically related to the contralateral breast carcinoma. Although the number of cases in our study is limited, there is evidence that local recurrence of bilateral breast carcinoma frequently arises from the ipsilateral tumor.

The long-term outcome of synchronous bilateral breast cancer is worse than metachronous or unilateral tumours

AIM

There is uncertainty in the literature as to whether bilateral breast cancer carries a worse prognosis than unilateral disease because some studies suggest that the development of a second primary does not influence survival, while others report a decreased survival in patients suffering from bilateral disease.

METHODS

A prospectively accrued and regularly validated database of 1945 patients with breast cancer treated in a district general hospital between 1963 and 1999 was analysed for clinical and pathological tumour characteristics including family history, grade, type of tumour, treatment and outcome.

RESULTS

Five per cent of patients (92) suffered from metachronous and 43 (2%) from synchronous bilateral breast cancer. A family history of breast cancer was more common in patients with metachronous bilateral breast cancer (38%), compared with the unilateral group (15%) and the synchronous bilateral breast cancer group (17%) (chi(2)=22.9, P<0.001). Patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer had a significantly worse overall survival when compared with those with metachronous bilateral or unilateral breast cancer (log-rank test chi(2)=6.1, P=0.047).

CONCLUSION

Women with metachronous breast cancer were more likely to have positive family history, while those with synchronous bilateral breast cancer tend to have shorter survival when compared with those with unilateral breast cancer. Synchronous bilaterality is not, however, an independent risk factor on multivariate analysis.