Polymorphism of XRCC1 (at codon 399) and susceptibility to breast cancer, a meta-analysis of the literatures

Investigation of Arg399Gln and Arg194Trp polymorphisms of the XRCC1 (x-ray cross-complementing group 1) gene and its correlation to sister chromatid exchange frequency in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Polymorphisms of the x-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) gene have been reported to be associated with various forms of cancer. We evaluated the possible effects of the Arg194Trp and the Arg399Gln polymorphisms on the risk for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in 73 patients and 50 controls. We also analyzed their relation to frequency of sister chromatid exchange (SCE). With respect to codon 194, the allelic frequency of the Arg194Trp polymorphism did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The proportion of individuals carrying the Arg194Trp polymorphism was not different in the 2 groups. With respect to codon 399, the proportion of the individuals carrying the Arg399Gln allele (90% vs 62%; p=0.000; odds ratio [OR], 5.779; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-15.183) and the allelic frequency of the Arg399Gln polymorphism (56% vs 36%; p=0.002; OR, 2.278; 95% CI, 1.350-3.843) was significantly higher in the patient group. The frequency of the Arg/Gln genotype was significantly higher in the patient group (68.50% vs 52%; p=0.049; OR, 2.007; 95% CI, 0.955-4.217). The mean SCE frequency in the patient group was significantly higher (9.2±4 vs 7.5±2; p=0.02). When different compound genotypes were compared, the coexistence of Arg/Arg genotype in codon 194 with Arg/Arg genotype in codon 399 was significantly more frequent in the control group (30% vs 9%; p=0.004; OR, 0.247; 95% CI, 0.092-0.664). Within the patient group, SCE frequency did not differ between patients with various genotypes. The Arg399Gln polymorphism may be etiologically associated with CLL; however, it does not seem to increase SCE frequency.

Susceptibility to exudative age-related macular degeneration and three genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase Z1 (GSTZ1)

Purpose

To investigate whether genetic polymorphisms of GSTZ1 contribute to the development of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods

The present case-control study consisted of 112 patients (44 female, 68 male) with exudative AMD and 112 sex frequency-matched healthy controls were randomly selected from unrelated volunteers in the same clinic. Genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism–based method.

Results

There was no significant association between study polymorphisms and susceptibility to exudative AMD. Considering the significant difference in age distribution between cases and controls, age was used as a covariate in further analysis. After odds ratio adjustment for age, the same results were observed. The study polymorphisms showed linkage disequilibrium. Analysis revealed that there was no difference between cases and controls for the prevalence of the haplotypes of GSTZ1.

Conclusions

Our study did not support any association between susceptibility to exudative AMD and polymorphisms of GSTZ1.

Susceptibility to breast cancer and three polymorphisms of GSTZ1

Glutathione S-transferases class zeta (GSTζ) is involved in the detoxification of xenobiotic compounds and catalyzes the biotransformation of a variety of α-haloacids including dichloroacetic acid and chlorofluoroacetic acid. It has been reported that, in mice, deficiency of Gstz1 (a member of GSTζ) resulted in the generation of a constant level of oxidative stress. The present study was carried out to investigate the association between genetic polymorphisms of GSTZ1 (in promoter site G-1002A and in coding sites Glu32Lys and Gly42Arg) and risk of breast cancer. We included 106 females with breast cancer and 106 healthy females frequency matched for age. The study polymorphisms were not associated with risk of breast cancer (p>0.05). The polymorphisms of GSTZ1 showed strong linkage disequilibrium among cancer patients and control subjects (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between cancer patients and controls for frequencies of the GSTZ1 haplotypes (p>0.05). It seems there is no meaningful relationship between the genetic polymorphisms of GSTZ1 and risk of breast cancer.

XRCC1 genetic polymorphism Arg399Gln and hepatocellular carcinoma risk: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies investigating the association between X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) genetic polymorphism Arg399Gln and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk report conflicting results. The aim of this study was to quantitatively summarize the evidence for such a relationship.

METHODS

Two investigators independently searched the Medline, Embase, CNKI and Chinese Biomedicine Database. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for XRCC1 polymorphism and HCC were calculated in a fixed-effects model (the Mantel-Haenszel method) and a random-effects model (the DerSimonian and Laird method) when appropriate. The pooled ORs were performed for a codominant model (Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Arg, Arg/Gln vs. Arg/Arg), a dominant model (Gln/Gln+Arg/Gln vs. Arg/Arg) and a recessive model (Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Gln+Arg/Arg).

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 11 case-control studies, which included 2208 HCC cases and 3265 controls. Overall, the variant genotypes (Gln/Gln and Arg/Gln) of Arg399Gln were not associated with HCC risk when compared with the wild-type Arg/Arg homozygote (Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Arg, OR=1.01, 95% CI=0.79-1.28; Arg/Gln vs. Arg/Arg, OR=1.09, 95% CI=0.81-1.45). Similarly, no associations were found in the dominant and recessive models (dominant model, OR=1.12, 95% CI=0.85-1.47; recessive model, OR=0.99, 95% CI=0.79-1.25). Limiting the analysis to the studies within Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the results were persistent and robust. When stratifying for ethnicity, country/region and source of controls, no evidence of a significant association was observed in any subgroup. No publication bias was found in the present study.

CONCLUSION

No association is found between the XRCC1 polymorphism Arg399Gln and the risk of HCC.

DNA repair genes polymorphism (XPG and XRCC1) and association of prostate cancer in a north Indian population

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men worldwide and is the second leading cause of cancer related mortality. Genetic background may account for the difference in susceptibility of individuals to different diseases and the relationship between genetic polymorphism and some diseases has been extensively studied. There are several common polymorphisms in genes encoding DNA repair enzymes, some of these polymorphisms are reported to result in subtle structural alterations of the repair enzyme and modulation of the repair capacity. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of XPG Asp 1104His and XRCC1 Arg309Gln polymorphisms on risk of prostate cancer in north Indian population. Statistically significant increased risk of prostate cancer was observed on individuals that posses His/His genotype of XPG (OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.99-6.56, P = 0.031). In this study 150 prostate cancer diagnosed patients, 150 healthy controls and 150 BPH (benign prostate hyper plasia) were recruited from north Indian population. Moreover, individuals that carried the Gln/Gln genotype of XRCC1 also showed statistically increased risk of prostate cancer (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.07-4.00, P = 0.033). The Asp/Asp of XPG and Gln/Gln of XRCC1 in combination showed statistically increased risk of prostate cancer in cases (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.09-10.16, P = 0.032).

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and association with breast cancer risk in the web study

Base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathways repair damaged DNA, and polymorphisms in these genes might affect breast cancer susceptibility. We evaluated associations between seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms in four DNA repair genes (ERCC4 rs1799801, XPC rs2227998, rs2228001, rs2228000, OGG1 rs1052133 and XRCC1 rs25487 and rs25486) and breast cancer risk, examining modification by smoking and alcohol consumption, using data from the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer Study. Women aged 35-79 years with incident breast cancer (n = 1170) and age- and race-matched controls (n = 2115) were enrolled. Genotyping was performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). No significant associations were observed in premenopausal women. Among postmenopausal women, rs25487 and rs25486 (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.01-1.51 and OR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.01-1.49, respectively, for combined heterozygous and homozygous variant compared with reference) were associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Postmenopausal women carrying the variant allele of the synonymous XPC polymorphism (rs2227998) were also at borderline significantly increased risk (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.01-1.52, heterozygous variant compared with reference; OR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.01-1.48, for combined heterozygous and homozygous variant compared with reference). There was no evidence of genotype-smoking and genotype-alcohol consumption interactions for pre- and postmenopausal women. These results indicate that some of the variants in BER and NER genes may influence risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.

XRCC1 downregulated through promoter hypermethylation is involved in human gastric carcinogenesis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the expression and aberrant methylation of X-ray repair cross-complementing gene 1 (XRCC1) in gastric carcinogenesis, and identify the molecular mechanism of gastric carcinogenesis.

METHODS

The method based on methyl binding domain protein (MBD) immuno-precipitation and promoter microarray was employed to screen the gastric cancer-related methylation-sensitive gene. An immunohistochemistry assay was applied to detect the protein expression of XRCC1 in the multistep progression of gastric carcinogenesis. The mRNA expression of XRCC1 was determined by real-time PCR in tumor tissues and their corresponding non-tumorous tissues. The methylation status and Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln polymorphisms of XRCC1 in gastric cancer and gastritis tissues were analyzed by methylation-specific PCR, bisulfite genomic sequencing and direct DNA sequencing, respectively.

RESULTS

Promoter microarray screening and identification suggested that XRCC1 was a methylation-sensitive gene. Immunochemistry results showed that XRCC1 protein expression gradually decreased with progression of gastric mucosal lesions (P < 0.05). The positive rate of XRCC1 in patients with well/moderately differentiated gastric cancer was significantly higher than patients with poorly differentiated gastric cancer (P < 0.05). The mRNA expression of XRCC1 in gastric cancer tissues was significantly lower than that in the non-tumorous tissues (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, XRCC1 methylation in gastric cancer tissues was more frequent than that in the gastritis tissues (P < 0.05), and the downregulation of XRCC1 expression was relevant to methylation (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The expression of XRCC1 is downregulated in gastric carcinogenesis, and promoter hypermethylation may be one of the mechanisms contributing to its downregulation.

Association between N142D genetic polymorphism of GSTO2 and susceptibility to colorectal cancer

Expression pattern analysis has been revealed that glutathione S-transferase omega 2 (GSTO2, a member of class omega) is ubiquitously expressed. Over expression of GSTO2 induced apoptosis. The gene encoding GSTO2 was localized to human chromosome 10q24.3, a region that may harbor gene(s) involved in the developing of colorectal cancer. To investigate the association between GSTO2 N142D genetic polymorphism and susceptibility to colorectal cancer the present study was done. We studied 63 (26 females, 37 males) colorectal cancer patients and 126 (52 females, 74 males) healthy individuals. The control subjects were frequency matched for age and gender with the colorectal cancer group. The genotypes were performed using RFLP-PCR method. The ND and DD genotypes were not associated with risk of colorectal cancer, in comparison with the NN genotype. Family history for cancer in the first degree of relatives significantly differed between cases and controls (P = 0.012). The profiles of GSTO2 genotypes and family history in control and cancerous groups were compared to each other. Subjects with NN genotype and positive family history significantly were at high risk to develop colorectal cancer in comparison with subjects with DD or ND genotypes and negative family history (P = 0.003). Present findings indicating that GSTO2 NN genotype increase the risk of colorectal cancer in persons with positive family history for cancer in the first degree relatives.

Influence of XRCC1 Genetic Polymorphisms on Ionizing Radiation-Induced DNA Damage and Repair

It is well known that ionizing radiation (IR) can damage DNA through a direct action, producing single- and double-strand breaks on DNA double helix, as well as an indirect effect by generating oxygen reactive species in the cells. Mammals have evolved several and distinct DNA repair pathways in order to maintain genomic stability and avoid tumour cell transformation. This review reports important data showing a huge interindividual variability on sensitivity to IR and in susceptibility to developing cancer; this variability is principally represented by genetic polymorphisms, that is, DNA repair gene polymorphisms. In particular we have focussed on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of XRCC1, a gene that encodes for a scaffold protein involved basically in Base Excision Repair (BER). In this paper we have reported and presented recent studies that show an influence of XRCC1 variants on DNA repair capacity and susceptibility to breast cancer.

A functional -77T>C polymorphism in XRCC1 is associated with risk of breast cancer

X-ray repair cross-complementing 1 (XRCC1) plays a critical role in base excision repair and genetic variations of XRCC1 may be associated with cancer susceptibility. We tested this hypothesis by examining the contribution of polymorphism in the regulatory region of XRCC1 -77T>C to risk of breast cancer in 995 patients and 1,004 controls. We found this polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, with an OR of 1.25 (95% CI, 1.00-1.56) for the -77TC genotype and 2.55 (95% CI, 1.11-5.86) for the -77CC genotype compared with the -77TT genotype. Haplotype analysis combining the -77T>C with three well-studied non-synonymous polymorphisms (Arg194Trp, Arg280His, and Arg399Gln) showed that only the -77C-containing haplotype was associated with the risk. Moreover, the C allele had more than 3-fold decreased luciferase expression compared with the T allele in breast cancer cell line MCF-7 (P < 0.001). A meta-analysis of seven publications with a total 2,888 cancer cases and 3,177 controls demonstrated that -77C was significantly associated with cancer risk, with an OR of 1.34 (95% CI, 1.18-1.51) for the TC genotype and 1.53 (95% CI, 1.14-2.07) for the CC genotype compared with the TT genotype. In conclusion, these findings indicated that XRCC1 -77T>C polymorphism may be a genetic determinant for developing breast cancer.

Haplotype analysis of XRCC1 (at codons 194 and 399) and susceptibility to breast cancer, a meta-analysis of the literatures

To clarify the association between XRCC1 haplotypes and susceptibility to breast cancer, a meta-analysis of case-control studies were conducted. Eligible studies were identified by searching several databases for relevant reports published before March 2010. In total, 10 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. XRCC1 haplotypes for Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln polymorphisms were included in the analysis. The association was measured using random-effect model or fixed-effect model odds ratio (OR) combined with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to the between studies' heterogeneity. Large between-study heterogeneity was observed (Q = 25.587, df = 9, P < 0.001). The meta-analysis showed a borderline increased risk of breast cancer associated with the Arg194-Gln399 haplotype versus the Arg194-Arg399 haplotype (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14). There was no significant association between XRCC1 haplotypes and risk of breast cancer among Caucasoid subjects. In the next step, studies were classified according to geographical locations. Studies reported form Western populations did not show heterogeneity, and the Arg194-Gln399 haplotype was not associated with risk of breast cancer in comparison with the Arg194-Arg399 haplotype (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.95-1.09). Among studies reported form Asian countries, significant heterogeneity was observed. After excluding of one study which did not show linkage disequilibrium, heterogeneity between studies decreased and haplotype Arg194-Gln399 revealed significant association with increased risk of breast cancer compared with haplotype Arg194-Arg399 (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.04-1.50). There was no significant association between Trp194-Arg399 haplotype and risk of breast cancer, neither in Western nor Asian countries. The present meta-analysis has indicated that the Arg194-Gln399 haplotype of XRCC1 might be a risk factor for breast cancer in Asian countries.

XRCC1 polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Previous studies investigating the association between X-ray repair cross-complementation group 1 (XRCC1) polymorphisms and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk has provided inconsistent results. The aim of our study was to clarify the effects of XRCC1variants on CRC risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted searches of the published literature in PubMed, Embase, and CBM databases up to July 6, 2009. Meta-analysis was performed by critically reviewing 14 studies with a total of 2,776 CRC cases and 4,402 controls on Arg399Gln polymorphism, four studies with a total of 931 CRC cases and 1,547 controls on Arg280His polymorphism, and nine studies with a total of 1,709 CRC cases and 3,233 controls on Arg194Trp polymorphism, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed with the software programs Review Manager (version 5.0.10) and STATA (version 9.2).

RESULTS

No significant association between Arg399Gln polymorphism and CRC risk was observed in both total population analyses and subgroup analyses based on ethnicity (OR(Co-dominant model) = 1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.45, P (OR) = 0.82; OR(Dominant model) = 1.02, 95% CI 0.80-1.30, P (OR) = 0.88; OR (Recessive model) = 1.04, 95% CI 0.81-1.34, P (OR) = 0.78). Arg280His polymorphism also had no significant association with CRC risk (OR(Co-dominant model) = 0.85, 95% CI 0.32-2.31, P (OR) = 0.76; OR(Dominant model) = 1.11, 95% CI 0.87-1.40, P (OR) = 0.40; OR(Recessive model) = 0.85, 95% CI 0.32-2.31, P (OR) = 0.75). Besides, there was also no evidence of association between Arg194Trp polymorphism and CRC risk (OR(Co-dominant model) = 1.43, 95% CI 0.83-2.48, P (OR) = 0.20; OR(Dominant model) = 1.14, 95% CI 0.87-1.51, P (OR) = 0.34; OR(Recessive model) = 1.32, 95% CI 0.82-2.13, P (OR) = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

No association is found between the polymorphisms in XRCC1 (Arg399Gln, Arg280His, and Arg194Trp) and risk of colorectal cancer.

Polymorphisms of TP53 codon 72 with breast carcinoma risk: evidence from 12226 cases and 10782 controls

BACKGROUND

Previously, TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms have been implicated as risk factors for various cancers. A number of studies have conducted on the association of TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms with susceptibility to breast carcinoma and have yielded inconclusive results. The aim of the present study was to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship.

METHODS

We conducted a search in the Medline, EMBASE, OVID, Sciencedirect, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) without a language limitation, covering all papers published up to Jan 2009. The associated literature was acquired through deliberate searching and selected based on the established inclusion criteria for publications.

RESULTS

A total of seventeen case-control studies, including 12226 cases and 10782 controls, met the included criteria and thus were selected. Ultimately, the relevant data were extracted and further analyzed using systematic meta-analyses. Overall, no associations of TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms with breast carcinoma were observed (for Arg/Arg vs Pro/Pro: OR = 1.20; 95%CI = 0.96-1.50; for dominant model: OR = 1.12; 95%CI = 0.96-1.32; for recessive model: OR = 1.13; 95%CI = 0.98-1.31). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, statistically similar results were obtained when the data were stratified as Asians, Caucasians and Africans.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, the results of the present study suggest that TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms might not be a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast carcinoma.

XRCC1 Arg399Gln, Arg194Trp and Arg280His polymorphisms in breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) plays an important role in base excision and single-strand break repair, as a scaffold protein that brings together proteins of the DNA repair complex, and appears to be a candidate for cancer risk. However, studies on the association between polymorphisms in this protein and cancer have yielded conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between the breast cancer and the XRCC1 polymorphisms Arg194Trp (9411 cases and 9783 controls), Arg399Gln (22 481 cases and 23 905 controls) and Arg280His (6062 cases and 5864 controls) in different inheritance models. Our analysis suggested that Arg399Gln was associated with a trend of increased breast cancer risk when using both dominant [odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.13] and recessive models (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.23) to analyse the data. In ethnic subgroups and using recessive model analysis: Arg399Gln increased breast cancer risk in Asians (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.96-1.64) and Africans (OR = 1.80, 95% CI: 0.97-3.32), and also while only slightly increasing the breast cancer risk in Caucasians (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.95-1.22). However, Arg194Trp (recessive model, OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.75-1.20) and Arg280His (recessive model, OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.64-2.55) did not appear to be risk factors for breast cancer. Larger scale primary studies are required to further evaluate the interaction of XRCC1 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in specific populations.

XRCC1 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in different populations: a meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the role of XRCC1 polymorphisms Arg194Trp, Arg280His and Arg399Gln in breast cancer. The results were pooled in a manner that appropriately reflects a biological model of gene effect using a random effects logistic regression model without multiple comparisons. Forty studies from 31 reports were included with 10 465 cases and 10 888 controls at Arg194Trp, 6156 cases and 5806 controls at Arg280His, and 21 467 cases and 22 766 controls at Arg399Gln. Our analysis found a tendency towards a recessive effect of Arg280His variant in Asian population only (His/His vs. Arg/Arg+Arg/His: OR=2.27, 95% CI=0.82, 6.31). An increased breast cancer risk with a recessive effect was also suggested for Arg399Gln variant in Asian population (Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Arg+Arg/Gln: OR=1.59, 95% CI=1.22, 2.09) only. These findings suggest that polymorphisms Arg280His and Arg399Gln may modify breast cancer risk differently in Caucasian and Asian populations.

XRCC1 genetic polymorphism Arg399Gln and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between x-ray cross-complementing gene 1 (XRCC1) genetic polymorphism Arg399Gln and prostate cancer risk using a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted to identify all case-control studies of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and prostate cancer risk. Statistical analysis was performed using the software program Review Manage, version 4.2, and STATA, version 8.0.

RESULTS

We identified 7 eligible reports, 1733 prostate cancer cases, and 1756 controls. No significant associations were observed between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer in worldwide populations, without any between-study heterogeneity. In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, our results indicated a significant association and recessive genetic mode of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism with prostate cancer risk in Asian subjects. Asians with the variant Gln/Gln allele were about 43% more likely to have prostate cancer than were those with the genotype Arg/Gln or Arg/Arg. However, our results also suggested that XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism was not significantly associated with prostate cancer in white men.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present meta-analysis have indicated that the XRCC1 codon 399 Gln allele might act as a recessive allele in its association with prostate cancer risk in Asians only.