Long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab for nasal polyposis in an open-label extension study

Biological Therapy of Severe Asthma and Nasal Polyps

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common disease worldwide and can be categorized into chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is common in patients with asthma and, particularly, severe asthma. Severe asthma is effectively treated with biologics and the coexistence of severe asthma with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps presents a phenotype that is more likely to respond to such treatment. In this review, we focus on the link between asthma and nasal polyps, and we review the treatment effect of various monoclonal antibodies in patients with severe asthma and nasal polyps as well as in patients with nasal polyps without asthma or with mild-to-moderate asthma. With the enhancement of our armamentarium with new monoclonal antibodies the right choice of biologic becomes an important target and one that is difficult to achieve due to the lack of comparative head-to-head studies.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: Quality of Life in the Biologics Era

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects up to 12% of the general population and is traditionally divided into two main phenotypic subsets, based on the presence of nasal polyps (CRSwNP) or their absence. It is well-established that many patients with CRSwNP report poor quality of life (QoL), which is further compromised by comorbidities (eg, asthma, bronchiectasis, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease). Chronic rhinosinusitis CRS with nasal polyps is managed with a combination of medical therapy and surgical interventions, and biologics are emerging as a promising new treatment option for patients with inadequate response to the standard of care. A range of patient-reported outcome measures have been used to assess QoL for patients with CRSwNP in clinical trials, including disease-specific questionnaires (eg, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22) and generic ones (eg, Short Form-36). Significantly impaired QoL has been identified as a criterion for the indication to use biologics in patients with CRSwNP. This review summarizes clinical evidence (2010-2021) on QoL outcomes with currently available treatments for CRSwNP and assesses the improvement in QoL after biologic treatments, especially for patients with comorbidities reported in interventional studies (randomized controlled trials and real-world experience).

Mechanisms and pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by local inflammation of the upper airways and is historically divided into 2 main phenotypes: CRS with nasal polyps and CRS without nasal polyps. Inflammation in CRS is mainly characterized by 3 endotypes based on elevation of canonical lymphocyte cytokines: type (T) 1 (T1) by TH1 cytokine IFN-γ, T2 by TH2 cutokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, and T3 by TH17 cytokines including IL-17. Inflammation in both CRS without nasal polyps and CRS with nasal polyps is highly heterogeneous, and the frequency of various endotypes varies geographically around the world. This finding complicates establishment of a unified understanding of the mechanisms of pathogenesis in CRS. Sinonasal epithelium acts as a passive barrier, and epithelial barrier dysfunction is a common feature in CRS induced by endotype-specific cytokines directly and indirectly. The sinonasal epithelium also participates in both innate immunity via recognition by innate pattern-recognition receptors and promotes and regulates adaptive immunity via release of chemokines and innate cytokines including thymic stromal lymphopoietin. The purpose of this review was to discuss the contribution of the epithelium to CRS pathogenesis and to update the field regarding endotypic heterogeneity and various mechanisms for understanding pathogenesis in CRS.

Studies on Clinical Features, Mechanisms, and Management of Olfactory Dysfunction Secondary to Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is one of the most common causes of inflammation of the olfactory system, warranting investigation of the link between chronic inflammation and the loss of olfactory function. Type 2 inflammation is closely related to the clinical features and disease mechanisms of olfactory dysfunction secondary to CRS. Patients with eosinophilic CRS, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, and central compartment atopic disease report increased olfactory dysfunction. Increased levels of interleukin-(IL-)2, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13 in the mucus from the olfactory slit have been reported to be associated with reduced olfactory test scores. The influence of several cytokines and signaling transduction pathways, including tumor necrosis factor-α, nuclear factor-κB, and c-Jun N-terminal kinases, on olfactory signal processing and neurogenesis has been demonstrated. Corticosteroids are the mainstay treatment for olfactory dysfunction secondary to CRS. Successful olfaction recovery was recently demonstrated in clinical trials of biotherapeutics, including omalizumab and dupilumab, although the treatment effect may diminish gradually after stopping the use of the medications. Future studies are required to relate the complex mechanisms underlying chronic inflammation in CRS to dysfunction of the olfactory system.

Interpretation of Clinical Efficacy of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps via Understanding the Local and Systemic Pathomechanisms

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease treated with medication or surgery. For recalcitrant type 2 CRSwNP, biological agents have been effectively used to improve nasal polyp score, nasal congestion score, daily symptoms related to CRSwNP, and time to systemic corticosteroid use or revision surgery. Although general guidelines for using biologics to treat CRSwNP were proposed by the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps in 2020 and various studies have tested their efficacy, there is much more to learn about biologics—specific indication and choice of biologics based on the endotypes, for instance. Understanding the vascular distribution of monoclonal antibodies and the differences in the vascularity of the non-polyp mucosa and nasal polyp tissue will not only aid understanding of each biologic’s clinical effect but also provide insights to establishing a more personalized approach to treating recalcitrant CRSwNP with biologics.

Advances in chronic rhinosinusitis in 2020 and 2021

Major progress has been achieved in the understanding and clinical practice of chronic rhinosinusitis, with or without nasal polyps. These advances resulted in a better understanding of the pathophysiology, the distribution into subgroups, and consequently in a better management perspective using classical approaches and biologics. Pathomechanisms, endotypes and biomarkers, and finally innovative therapeutic approaches are themes especially for the more severe forms of chronic rhinosinusitis, those with uncontrolled severe nasal polyps. Biologicals against key type 2 cytokines are gaining ground in the long-term treatment approaches of often recurrent nasal polyps, and should be integrated in care pathways making use of classical and innovative treatment pathways. These areas of interest show a fast development and will profoundly change our disease management within a decade.