51
|
Boeke S, Mönnich D, van Timmeren JE, Balermpas P. MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Current Developments, Perspectives, and Challenges. Front Oncol 2021; 11:616156. [PMID: 33816247 PMCID: PMC8017313 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.616156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Based on the development of new hybrid machines consisting of an MRI and a linear accelerator, magnetic resonance image guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has revolutionized the field of adaptive treatment in recent years. Although an increasing number of studies have been published, investigating technical and clinical aspects of this technique for various indications, utilizations of MRgRT for adaptive treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) remains in its infancy. Yet, the possible benefits of this novel technology for HNC patients, allowing for better soft-tissue delineation, intra- and interfractional treatment monitoring and more frequent plan adaptations appear more than obvious. At the same time, new technical, clinical, and logistic challenges emerge. The purpose of this article is to summarize and discuss the rationale, recent developments, and future perspectives of this promising radiotherapy modality for treating HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - David Mönnich
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Thorwarth D, Low DA. Technical Challenges of Real-Time Adaptive MR-Guided Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:634507. [PMID: 33763369 PMCID: PMC7982516 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.634507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past few years, radiotherapy (RT) has experienced a major technological innovation with the development of hybrid machines combining magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and linear accelerators. This new technology for MR-guided cancer treatment has the potential to revolutionize the field of adaptive RT due to the opportunity to provide high-resolution, real-time MR imaging before and during treatment application. However, from a technical point of view, several challenges remain which need to be tackled to ensure safe and robust real-time adaptive MR-guided RT delivery. In this manuscript, several technical challenges to MR-guided RT are discussed. Starting with magnetic field strength tradeoffs, the potential and limitations for purely MR-based RT workflows are discussed. Furthermore, the current status of real-time 3D MR imaging and its potential for real-time RT are summarized. Finally, the potential of quantitative MR imaging for future biological RT adaptation is highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Hirata K, Tamaki N. Quantitative FDG PET Assessment for Oncology Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040869. [PMID: 33669531 PMCID: PMC7922629 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary PET enables quantitative assessment of tumour biology in vivo. Accumulation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) may reflect tumour metabolic activity. Quantitative assessment of FDG uptake can be applied for treatment monitoring. Numerous studies indicated biochemical change assessed by FDG-PET as a more sensitive marker than morphological change. Those with complete metabolic response after therapy may show better prognosis. Assessment of metabolic change may be performed using absolute FDG uptake or metabolic tumour volume. More recently, radiomics approaches have been applied to FDG PET. Texture analysis quantifies intratumoral heterogeneity in a voxel-by-voxel basis. Combined with various machine learning techniques, these new quantitative parameters hold a promise for assessing tissue characterization and predicting treatment effect, and could also be used for future prognosis of various tumours. Abstract Positron emission tomography (PET) has unique characteristics for quantitative assessment of tumour biology in vivo. Accumulation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) may reflect tumour characteristics based on its metabolic activity. Quantitative assessment of FDG uptake can often be applied for treatment monitoring after chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Numerous studies indicated biochemical change assessed by FDG PET as a more sensitive marker than morphological change estimated by CT or MRI. In addition, those with complete metabolic response after therapy may show better disease-free survival and overall survival than those with other responses. Assessment of metabolic change may be performed using absolute FDG uptake in the tumour (standardized uptake value: SUV). In addition, volumetric parameters such as metabolic tumour volume (MTV) have been introduced for quantitative assessment of FDG uptake in tumour. More recently, radiomics approaches that focus on image-based precision medicine have been applied to FDG PET, as well as other radiological imaging. Among these, texture analysis extracts intratumoral heterogeneity on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Combined with various machine learning techniques, these new quantitative parameters hold a promise for assessing tissue characterization and predicting treatment effect, and could also be used for future prognosis of various tumours, although multicentre clinical trials are needed before application in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Hirata
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan;
| | - Nagara Tamaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Intravoxel incoherent motion as a tool to detect early microstructural changes in meningiomas treated with proton therapy. Neuroradiology 2021; 63:1053-1060. [PMID: 33392736 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02630-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess early microstructural changes of meningiomas treated with proton therapy through quantitative analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters. METHODS Seventeen subjects with meningiomas that were eligible for proton therapy treatment were retrospectively enrolled. Each subject underwent a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including DWI sequences and IVIM assessments at baseline, immediately before the 1st (t0), 10th (t10), 20th (t20), and 30th (t30) treatment fraction and at follow-up. Manual tumor contours were drawn on T2-weighted images by two expert neuroradiologists and then rigidly registered to DWI images. Median values of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion (D), pseudo-diffusion (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were extracted at all timepoints. Statistical analysis was performed using the pairwise Wilcoxon test. RESULTS Statistically significant differences from baseline to follow-up were found for ADC, D, and D* values, with a progressive increase in ADC and D in conjunction with a progressive decrease in D*. MRI during treatment showed statistically significant differences in D values between t0 and t20 (p = 0.03) and t0 and t30 (p = 0.02), and for ADC values between t0 and t20 (p = 0.04), t10 and t20 (p = 0.02), and t10 and t30 (p = 0.035). Subjects that showed a volume reduction greater than 15% of the baseline tumor size at follow-up showed early D changes, whereas ADC changes were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION IVIM appears to be a useful tool for detecting early microstructural changes within meningiomas treated with proton therapy and may potentially be able to predict tumor response.
Collapse
|
55
|
Gani C, Boeke S, McNair H, Ehlers J, Nachbar M, Mönnich D, Stolte A, Boldt J, Marks C, Winter J, Künzel LA, Gatidis S, Bitzer M, Thorwarth D, Zips D. Marker-less online MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases at a 1.5 T MR-Linac - Feasibility, workflow data and patient acceptance. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 26:55-61. [PMID: 33319073 PMCID: PMC7723999 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an established ablative treatment for liver tumors with excellent local control rates. Magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) provides superior soft tissue contrast and may therefore facilitate a marker-less liver SBRT workflow. The goal of the present study was to investigate feasibility, workflow parameters, toxicity and patient acceptance of MRgSBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. METHODS Ten consecutive patients with liver metastases treated on a 1.5 T MR-Linac were included in this prospective trial. Tumor delineation was performed on four-dimensional computed tomography scans and both exhale triggered and free-breathing T2 MRI scans from the MR-Linac. An internal target volume based approach was applied. Organ at risk constraints were based on the UKSABR guidelines (Version 6.1). Patient acceptance regarding device specific aspects was assessed and toxicity was scored according to the common toxicity criteria of adverse events, version 5. RESULTS Nine of ten tumors were clearly visible on the 1.5 T MR-Linac. No patient had fiducial markers placed for treatment. All patients were treated with three or five fractions. Median dose to 98% of the gross tumor volume was 38.5 Gy. The median time from "patient identity check" until "beam-off" was 31 min. Median beam on time was 9.6 min. Online MRgRT was well accepted in general and no treatment had to be interrupted on patient request. No event of symptomatic radiation induced liver disease was observed after a median follow-up of ten month (range 3-17 months). CONCLUSION Our early experience suggests that online 1.5 T MRgSBRT of liver metastases represents a promising new non-invasive marker-free treatment modality based on high image quality, clinically reasonable in-room times and high patient acceptance. Further studies are necessary to assess clinical outcome, to validate advanced motion management and to explore the benefit of online response adaptive liver SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S. Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H. McNair
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - J. Ehlers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - M. Nachbar
- Section for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - D. Mönnich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - A. Stolte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - J. Boldt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - C. Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - J. Winter
- Section for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Luise A. Künzel
- Section for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - S. Gatidis
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M. Bitzer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - D. Thorwarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - D. Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Kooreman ES, van Houdt PJ, Keesman R, Pos FJ, van Pelt VWJ, Nowee ME, Wetscherek A, Tijssen RHN, Philippens MEP, Thorwarth D, Wang J, Shukla-Dave A, Hall WA, Paulson ES, van der Heide UA. ADC measurements on the Unity MR-linac - A recommendation on behalf of the Elekta Unity MR-linac consortium. Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:106-113. [PMID: 33017604 PMCID: PMC8327388 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for treatment response monitoring is feasible on hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems. The MRI scanner of the Elekta Unity system has an adjusted design compared to diagnostic scanners. We investigated its impact on measuring the DWI-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) regarding three aspects: the choice of b-values, the spatial variation of the ADC, and scanning during radiation treatment. The aim of this study is to give recommendations for accurate ADC measurements on Unity systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements with increasing b-values were done to determine the highest bvalue that can be measured reliably. The spatial variation of the ADC was assessed on six Unity systems with a cylindrical phantom of 40 cm diameter. The influence of gantry rotation and irradiation was investigated by acquiring DWI images before and during treatment of 11 prostate cancer patients. RESULTS On the Unity system, a maximum b-value of 500 s/mm2 should be used for ADC quantification, as a trade-off between SNR and diffusion weighting. Accurate ADC values were obtained within 7 cm from the iso-center, while outside this region ADC values deviated more than 5%. The ADC was not influenced by the rotating linac or irradiation during treatment. CONCLUSION We provide Unity system specific recommendations for measuring the ADC. This will increase the consistency of ADC values acquired in different centers on the Unity system, enabling large cohort studies for biomarker discovery and treatment response monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernst S Kooreman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vivian W J van Pelt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies E Nowee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rob H N Tijssen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Departments of Medical Physics and Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
| | - Eric S Paulson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Grand challenges for medical physics in radiation oncology. Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:7-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
58
|
Scholey JE, Chandramohan D, Naren T, Liu W, Larson PEZ, Sudhyadhom A. Technical Note: A methodology for improved accuracy in stopping power estimation using MRI and CT. Med Phys 2020; 48:342-353. [PMID: 33107997 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy is becoming an increasingly popular cancer treatment modality due to the proton's physical advantage in that it deposits the majority of its energy at the distal end of its track where the tumor is located. The proton range in a material is determined from the stopping power ratio (SPR) of the material. However, SPR is typically estimated based on a computed tomography (CT) scan which can lead to range estimation errors due to the difference in x-ray and proton interactions in matter, which can preclude the ability to utilize protons to their full potential. Applications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy have increased over the past decade and using MRI to calculate SPR directly could provide numerous advantages. The purpose of this study was to develop a practical implementation of a novel multimodal imaging method for estimating SPR and compare the results of this method to physical measurements in which values were computed directly using tissue substitute materials fabricated to mimic skin, muscle, adipose, and spongiosa bone. METHODS For both the multimodal imaging method and physical measurements, SPR was calculated using the Bethe-Bloch equation from values of relative electron density and mean ionization potential determined for each tissue. Parameters used to estimate SPR using the multimodal imaging method were extracted from Dixon water-only and (1 H) proton density-weighted zero echo time MRI sequences and CT, with both kVCT and MVCT used separately to evaluate the performance of each. For comparison, SPR was also computed from kVCT using the stoichiometric method, the current clinical standard. RESULTS Results showed that our multimodal imaging approach using MRI with either kVCT or MVCT was in close agreement to SPR calculated from physical measurements for the four tissue substitutes evaluated. Using MRI and MVCT, SPR values estimated using our method were within 1% of physical measurements and were more accurate than the stoichiometric method for the tissue types studied. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated the methodology for improved estimation of SPR using the proposed multimodal imaging framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica E Scholey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dharshan Chandramohan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tarun Naren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - William Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peder Eric Zufall Larson
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, The University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Atchar Sudhyadhom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Thorwarth D, Ege M, Nachbar M, Mönnich D, Gani C, Zips D, Boeke S. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging on hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerators: Perspective on technical and clinical validation. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 16:69-73. [PMID: 33458346 PMCID: PMC7807787 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Many preclinical and clinical observations support that functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), such as diffusion weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, might have a predictive value for radiotherapy. The aim of this review was to assess the current status of quantitative MRI on hybrid MR-Linacs. In a literature research, four publications were identified, investigating technical feasibility, accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of DW and DCE-MRI in phantoms and first patients. Accuracy and short term repeatability was < 5% for DW-MRI in current MR-Linac systems. Consequently, quantitative imaging providing accurate and reproducible functional information seems possible in MR-Linacs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Ege
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcel Nachbar
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - David Mönnich
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Hansen CR, Crijns W, Hussein M, Rossi L, Gallego P, Verbakel W, Unkelbach J, Thwaites D, Heijmen B. Radiotherapy Treatment plannINg study Guidelines (RATING): A framework for setting up and reporting on scientific treatment planning studies. Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:67-78. [PMID: 32976873 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy treatment planning studies contribute significantly to advances and improvements in radiation treatment of cancer patients. They are a pivotal step to support and facilitate the introduction of novel techniques into clinical practice, or as a first step before clinical trials can be carried out. There have been numerous examples published in the literature that demonstrated the feasibility of such techniques as IMRT, VMAT, IMPT, or that compared different treatment methods (e.g. non-coplanar vs coplanar treatment), or investigated planning approaches (e.g. automated planning). However, for a planning study to generate trustworthy new knowledge and give confidence in applying its findings, then its design, execution and reporting all need to meet high scientific standards. This paper provides a 'quality framework' of recommendations and guidelines that can contribute to the quality of planning studies and resulting publications. Throughout the text, questions are posed and, if applicable to a specific study and if met, they can be answered positively in the provided 'RATING' score sheet. A normalised weighted-sum score can then be calculated from the answers as a quality indicator. The score sheet can also be used to suggest how the quality might be improved, e.g. by focussing on questions with high weight, or by encouraging consideration of aspects given insufficient attention. Whilst the overall aim of this framework and scoring system is to improve the scientific quality of treatment planning studies and papers, it might also be used by reviewers and journal editors to help to evaluate scientific manuscripts reporting planning studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Rønn Hansen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department Oncology - Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Belgium; Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mohammad Hussein
- Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - Linda Rossi
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pedro Gallego
- Servei de Radiofísica I Radioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jan Unkelbach
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Dercle L, Henry T, Carré A, Paragios N, Deutsch E, Robert C. Reinventing radiation therapy with machine learning and imaging bio-markers (radiomics): State-of-the-art, challenges and perspectives. Methods 2020; 188:44-60. [PMID: 32697964 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a pivotal cancer treatment that has significantly progressed over the last decade due to numerous technological breakthroughs. Imaging is now playing a critical role on deployment of the clinical workflow, both for treatment planning and treatment delivery. Machine-learning analysis of predefined features extracted from medical images, i.e. radiomics, has emerged as a promising clinical tool for a wide range of clinical problems addressing drug development, clinical diagnosis, treatment selection and implementation as well as prognosis. Radiomics denotes a paradigm shift redefining medical images as a quantitative asset for data-driven precision medicine. The adoption of machine-learning in a clinical setting and in particular of radiomics features requires the selection of robust, representative and clinically interpretable biomarkers that are properly evaluated on a representative clinical data set. To be clinically relevant, radiomics must not only improve patients' management with great accuracy but also be reproducible and generalizable. Hence, this review explores the existing literature and exposes its potential technical caveats, such as the lack of quality control, standardization, sufficient sample size, type of data collection, and external validation. Based upon the analysis of 165 original research studies based on PET, CT-scan, and MRI, this review provides an overview of new concepts, and hypotheses generating findings that should be validated. In particular, it describes evolving research trends to enhance several clinical tasks such as prognostication, treatment planning, response assessment, prediction of recurrence/relapse, and prediction of toxicity. Perspectives regarding the implementation of an AI-based radiotherapy workflow are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Theophraste Henry
- Molecular Radiotherapy and Innovative Therapeutics, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France; Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexandre Carré
- Molecular Radiotherapy and Innovative Therapeutics, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Eric Deutsch
- Molecular Radiotherapy and Innovative Therapeutics, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Robert
- Molecular Radiotherapy and Innovative Therapeutics, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Redalen KR, Thorwarth D. Future directions on the merge of quantitative imaging and artificial intelligence in radiation oncology. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:44-45. [PMID: 33458325 PMCID: PMC7807640 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Gurney-Champion OJ, Kieselmann JP, Wong KH, Ng-Cheng-Hin B, Harrington K, Oelfke U. A convolutional neural network for contouring metastatic lymph nodes on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images for assessment of radiotherapy response. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:1-7. [PMID: 33043156 PMCID: PMC7536306 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Retrieving quantitative parameters from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), e.g. for early assessment of radiotherapy treatment response, necessitates contouring regions of interest, which is time-consuming and prone to errors. This becomes more pressing for daily imaging on MRI-guided radiotherapy systems. Therefore, we trained a deep convolutional neural network to automatically contour involved lymph nodes on diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients receiving radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS DW-images from 48 HNC patients (18 induction-chemotherapy + chemoradiotherapy; 30 definitive chemoradiotherapy) with 68 involved lymph nodes were obtained on a diagnostic 1.5 T MR-scanner prior to and 2-3 timepoints throughout treatment. A radiation oncologist delineated the lymph nodes on the b = 50 s/mm2 images. A 3D U-net was trained to contour involved lymph nodes. Its performance was evaluated in all 48 patients using 8-fold cross-validation and calculating the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the absolute difference in median apparent diffusion coefficient (ΔADC) between the manual and generated contours. Additionally, the performance was evaluated in an independent dataset of three patients obtained on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. RESULTS In the definitive chemoradiotherapy patients (n = 96 patients/lymphnodes/timepoints) the DSC was 0.87 (0.81-0.91) [median (1st-3rd quantiles)] and ΔADC was 1.9% (0.8-3.4%) and both remained stable throughout treatment. The network performed worse in the patients receiving induction-chemotherapy (n = 65), with DSC = 0.80 (0.71-0.87) and ΔADC = 3.3% (1.6-8.0%). The network performed well on the MR-Linac data (n = 8) with DSC = 0.80 (0.75-0.82) and ΔADC = 4.0% (0.6-9.1%). CONCLUSIONS We established accurate automatic contouring of involved lymph nodes for HNC patients on diagnostic and MR-Linac DW-images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver J. Gurney-Champion
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer P. Kieselmann
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kee H. Wong
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brian Ng-Cheng-Hin
- Targeted Therapy Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Harrington
- Targeted Therapy Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|