Linking agonist binding to histamine H1 receptor activation

Histamine in the nervous system

Histamine is a transmitter in the nervous system and a signaling molecule in the gut, the skin, and the immune system. Histaminergic neurons in mammalian brain are located exclusively in the tuberomamillary nucleus of the posterior hypothalamus and send their axons all over the central nervous system. Active solely during waking, they maintain wakefulness and attention. Three of the four known histamine receptors and binding to glutamate NMDA receptors serve multiple functions in the brain, particularly control of excitability and plasticity. H1 and H2 receptor-mediated actions are mostly excitatory; H3 receptors act as inhibitory auto- and heteroreceptors. Mutual interactions with other transmitter systems form a network that links basic homeostatic and higher brain functions, including sleep-wake regulation, circadian and feeding rhythms, immunity, learning, and memory in health and disease.

Delineation of agonist binding to the human histamine H4 receptor using mutational analysis, homology modeling, and ab initio calculations

A three-dimensional homology model of the human histamine H 4 receptor was developed to investigate the binding mode of a series of structurally diverse H 4-agonists, i.e. histamine, clozapine, and the recently described selective, nonimidazole agonist VUF 8430. Mutagenesis studies and docking of these ligands in a rhodopsin-based homology model revealed two essential points of interactions in the binding pocket, i.e. Asp3.32 and Glu5.46 (Ballesteros-Weinstein numbering system). It is postulated that Asp3.32 interacts in its anionic state, whereas Glu5.46 interacts in its neutral form. The hypothesis was tested with the point mutations D3.32N and E5.46Q. For the D3.32N no binding affinity toward any of the ligands could be detected. This is in sharp contrast to the E5.46Q mutant, which discriminates between various ligands. The affinity of histamine-like ligands was decreased approximately a 1000-fold, whereas the affinity of all other ligands remained virtually unchanged. The proposed model for agonist binding as well as ab initio calculations for histamine and VUF 8430 explain the observed differences in binding to the H 4R mutants. These studies provide a molecular understanding for the action of a variety of H 4 receptor-ligands. The resulting H 4 receptor model will be the basis for the development of new H 4 receptor-ligands.

5-HT(4) receptors: history, molecular pharmacology and brain functions

Twenty years ago, we started the characterization of a 5-HT receptor coupled to cAMP production in neurons. This receptor obviously had a different pharmacology to the other 5-HT receptors described at that time, i.e. the 5-HT(1), 5-HT(2), 5-HT(3) receptors. We proposed to name it the 5-HT(4) receptor. Nowadays, 5-HT(4) receptors are one of the most studied GPCRs belonging to the "rhodopsin" family. Thanks to the existence of a great variety of ligands with inverse agonist, partial agonist, agonist and antagonist profiles, the pharmacological and physiological properties of this receptor are beginning to emerge. Although some 5-HT(4) partial agonists have been on the market for gastro-intestinal pathologies, 5-HT(4) receptor drugs have still to be commercialized for brain disorders. However, since 5-HT(4) receptors have recognized effects on memory, depression and feeding in animal models, there is still hope for a therapeutic destiny of this interesting target in brain disorders.

Differential bonding interactions of inverse agonists of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in stabilizing the inactive state

Although the sartan family of angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockers (ARBs), which includes valsartan, olmesartan, and losartan, have a common pharmacophore structure, their effectiveness in therapy differs. Although their efficacy may be related to their binding strength, this notion has changed with a better understanding of the molecular mechanism. Therefore, we hypothesized that each ARB differs with regard to its molecular interactions with AT(1) receptor in inducing inverse agonism. Interactions between valsartan and residues Ser(105), Ser(109), and Lys(199) were important for binding. Valsartan is a strong inverse agonist of constitutive inositol phosphate production by the wild-type and N111G mutant receptors. Substituted cysteine accessibility mapping studies indicated that valsartan, but not losartan, which has only weak inverse agonism, may stabilize the N111G receptor in an inactive state upon binding. In addition, the inverse agonism by valsatan was mostly abolished with S105A/S109A/K199Q substitutions in the N111G background. Molecular modeling suggested that Ser(109) and Lys(199) bind to phenyl and tetrazole groups of valsartan, respectively. Ser(105) is a candidate for binding to the carboxyl group of valsartan. Thus, the most critical interaction for inducing inverse agonism involves transmembrane (TM) V (Lys(199)) of AT(1) receptor although its inverse agonist potency is comparable to olmesartan, which bonds with TM III (Tyr(113)) and TM VI (His(256)). These results provide new insights into improving ARBs and development of new G protein-coupled receptor antagonists.

Constitutively active mutants of the histamine H1 receptor suggest a conserved hydrophobic asparagine-cage that constrains the activation of class A G protein-coupled receptors

The aim of this study was to create and characterize constitutively active mutant (CAM) histamine H(1) receptors (H(1)R) using random mutagenesis methods to further investigate the activation process of the rhodopsin-like family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This approach identified position 6.40 in TM 6 as a "hot spot" because mutation of Ile6.40(420) either to Glu, Gly, Ala, Arg, Lys, or Ser resulted in highly active CAM H(1)Rs, for which almost no histamine-induced receptor activation response could be detected. The highly conserved hydrophobic amino acid at position 6.40 defines, in a computational model of the H(1)R, the asparagine cage motif that restrains the side chain of Asn7.49 of the NPxxY motif toward transmembrane domain (TM 6) in the inactive state of the receptor. Mutation of the asparagine cage into Ala or Gly, removing the interfering bulky constraints, increases the constitutive activity of the receptor. The fact that the Ile6.40(420)Arg/Lys/Glu mutant receptors are highly active CAM H(1)Rs leads us to suggest that a positively charged residue, presumably the highly conserved Arg3.50 from the DRY motif, interacts in a direct or an indirect (through other side chains or/and internal water molecules) manner with the acidic Asp2.50..Asn7.49 pair for receptor activation.

Mechanism of Activation of a G Protein-coupled Receptor, the Human Cholecystokinin-2 Receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a major focus in functional genomics programs and drug development research, but their important potential as drug targets contrasts with the still limited data available concerning their activation mechanism. Here, we investigated the activation mechanism of the cholecystokinin-2 receptor (CCK2R). The three-dimensional structure of inactive CCK2R was homology-modeled on the basis of crystal coordinates of inactive rhodopsin. Starting from the inactive CCK2R modeled structure, active CCK2R (namely cholecystokinin-occupied CCK2R) was modeled by means of steered molecular dynamics in a lipid bilayer and by using available data from other GPCRs, including rhodopsin. By comparing the modeled structures of the inactive and active CCK2R, we identified changes in the relative position of helices and networks of interacting residues, which were expected to stabilize either the active or inactive states of CCK2R. Using targeted molecular dynamics simulations capable of converting CCK2R from the inactive to the active state, we delineated structural changes at the atomic level. The activation mechanism involved significant movements of helices VI and V, a slight movement of helices IV and VII, and changes in the position of critical residues within or near the binding site. The mutation of key amino acids yielded inactive or constitutively active CCK2R mutants, supporting this proposed mechanism. Such progress in the refinement of the CCK2R binding site structure and in knowledge of CCK2R activation mechanisms will enable target-based optimization of nonpeptide ligands.

Analysis of the activation mechanism of the guinea-pig Histamine H1-receptor

The Histamine H(1)-receptor (H1R), belonging to the amine receptor-class of family A of the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) gets activated by agonists. The consequence is a conformational change of the receptor, which may involve the binding-pocket. So, for a good prediction of the binding-mode of an agonist, it is necessary to have knowledge about these conformational changes. Meanwhile some experimental data about the structural changes of GPCRs during activation exist. Based on homology modeling of the guinea-pig H1R (gpH1R), using the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin as template, we performed several MD simulations with distance restraints in order to get an inactive and an active structure of the gpH1R. The calculations led to a Phe6.44/Trp6.48/Phe6.52-switch and linearization of the proline kinked transmembrane helix VI during receptor activation. Our calculations showed that the Trp6.48/Phe6.52-switch induces a conformational change in Phe6.44, which slides between transmembrane helices III and VI. Additionally we observed a hydrogen bond interaction of Ser3.39 with Asn7.45 in the inactive gpH1R, but because of a counterclockwise rotation of transmembrane helix III Ser3.39 establishes a water-mediated hydrogen bond to Asp2.50 in the active gpH1R. Additionally we simulated a possible mechanism for receptor activation with a modified LigPath-algorithm.

Structural determinants for ligand-receptor conformational selection in a peptide G protein-coupled receptor

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate the majority of physiological processes through specific intermolecular interactions with structurally diverse ligands and activation of differential intracellular signaling. A key issue yet to be resolved is how GPCRs developed selectivity and diversity of ligand binding and intracellular signaling during evolution. We have explored the structural basis of selectivity of naturally occurring gonadotropin-releasing hormones (GnRHs) from different species in the single functional human GnRH receptor. We found that the highly variable amino acids in position 8 of the naturally occurring isoforms of GnRH play a discriminating role in selecting receptor conformational states. The human GnRH receptor has a higher affinity for the cognate GnRH I but a lower affinity for GnRH II and GnRHs from other species possessing substitutions for Arg(8). The latter were partial agonists in the human GnRH receptor. Mutation of Asn(7.45) in transmembrane domain (TM) 7 had no effect on GnRH I affinity but specifically increased affinity for other GnRHs and converted them to full agonists. Using molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis, we demonstrated that the highly conserved Asn(7.45) makes intramolecular interactions with a highly conserved Cys(6.47) in TM 6, suggesting that disruption of this intramolecular interaction induces a receptor conformational change which allosterically alters ligand specific binding sites and changes ligand selectivity and signaling efficacy. These results reveal GnRH ligand and receptor structural elements for conformational selection, and support co-evolution of GnRH ligand and receptor conformations.

Pharmacogenomic and Structural Analysis of Constitutive G Protein–Coupled Receptor Activity

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) respond to a chemically diverse plethora of signal transduction molecules. The notion that GPCRs also signal without an external chemical trigger, i.e., in a constitutive or spontaneous manner, resulted in a paradigm shift in the field of GPCR pharmacology. The discovery of constitutive GPCR activity and the fact that GPCR binding and signaling can be strongly affected by a single point mutation drew attention to the evolving area of GPCR pharmacogenomics. For a variety of GPCRs, point mutations have been convincingly linked to human disease. Mutations within conserved motifs, known to be involved in GPCR activation, might explain the properties of some naturally occurring, constitutively active GPCR variants linked to disease. In this review, we provide a brief historical introduction to the concept of constitutive receptor activity and the pharmacogenomic and structural aspects of constitutive receptor activity.

Critical role for polar residues in coupling leukotriene B4 binding to signal transduction in BLT1

Leukotriene B(4) (LTB(4)) mediates a variety of inflammatory diseases such as asthma, arthritis, atherosclerosis, and cancer through activation of the G-protein-coupled receptor, BLT1. Using in silico molecular dynamics simulations combined with site-directed mutagenesis we characterized the ligand binding site and activation mechanism for BLT1. Mutation of residues predicted as potential ligand contact points in transmembrane domains (TMs) III (H94A and Y102A), V (E185A), and VI (N241A) resulted in reduced binding affinity. Analysis of arginines in extracellular loop 2 revealed that mutating arginine 156 but not arginine 171 or 178 to alanine resulted in complete loss of LTB(4) binding to BLT1. Structural models for the ligand-free and ligand-bound states of BLT1 revealed an activation core formed around Asp-64, displaying multiple dynamic interactions with Asn-36, Ser-100, and Asn-281 and a triad of serines, Ser-276, Ser-277, and Ser-278. Mutagenesis of many of these residues in BLT1 resulted in loss of signaling capacity while retaining normal LTB(4) binding function. Thus, polar residues within TMs III, V, and VI and extracellular loop 2 are critical for ligand binding, whereas polar residues in TMs II, III, and VII play a central role in transducing the ligand-induced conformational change to activation. The delineation of a validated binding site and activation mechanism should facilitate structure-based design of inhibitors targeting BLT1.

Solid-State NMR Evidence for a Protonation Switch in the Binding Pocket of the H1 Receptor upon Binding of the Agonist Histamine

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a major superfamily of transmembrane receptor proteins that are crucial in cellular signaling and are major pharmacological targets. While the activity of GPCRs can be modulated by agonist binding, the mechanisms that link agonist binding to G protein coupling are poorly understood. Here we present a method to accurately examine the activity of ligands in their bound state, even at low affinity, by solid-state NMR dipolar correlation spectroscopy and confront this method with the human H1 receptor. The analysis reveals two different charge states of the bound agonist, dicationic with a charged imidazole ring and monocationic with a neutral imidazole ring, with the same overall conformation. The combination of charge difference and pronounced heterogeneity agrees with converging evidence that the active and inactive states of the GPCR represent a dynamic equilibrium of substates and that proton transfer between agonist and protein side chains can shift this equilibrium by stabilizing the active receptor population relative to the inactive one. In fact, the data suggest a global functional analogy between H1 receptor activation and the meta I/meta II charge/discharge equilibrium in rhodopsin (GPCR). This corroborates current ideas on unifying principles in GPCR structure and function.

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate responses to hormones and neurotransmitters, as well as the senses of sight, smell, and taste. These remarkably versatile signaling molecules respond to structurally diverse ligands. Many GPCRs couple to multiple G protein subtypes, and several have been shown to activate G protein-independent signaling pathways. Drugs acting on GPCRs exhibit efficacy profiles that may differ for different signaling cascades. The functional plasticity exhibited by GPCRs can be attributed to structural flexibility and the existence of multiple ligand-specific conformational states. This chapter will review our current understanding of the mechanism by which agonists bind and activate GPCRs.

Activation of the CXCR3 Chemokine Receptor through Anchoring of a Small Molecule Chelator Ligand between TM-III, -IV, and -VI

Seven transmembrane segment (7TM) receptors are activated through a common, still rather unclear molecular mechanism by a variety of chemical messengers ranging from monoamines to large proteins. By introducing a His residue at position III:05 in the CXCR3 receptor a metal ion site was built between the extracellular ends of transmembrane (TM) III and TM-IV to anchor aromatic chelators at a location corresponding to the presumed binding pocket for adrenergic receptor agonists. In this construct, free metal ions had no agonistic effect in accordance with the optimal geometry of the metal ion site in molecular models built over the inactive form of rhodopsin. In contrast, the aromatic chelators bipyridine or phenanthrolene in complex with Zn(II) or Cu(II) acted as potent agonists displaying signaling efficacies similar to or even better than the endogenous chemokine agonists. Molecular modeling and molecular simulations combined with mutational analysis indicated that the metal ion site-anchored chelators act as agonists by establishing an aromatic-aromatic, second-site interaction with TyrVI:16 on the inner face of TM-VI. It is noteworthy that this interaction required that the extracellular segment of TM-VI moves inward in the direction of TM-III, whereby TyrVI:16 together with the chelators complete an "aromatic zipper" also comprising PheIII:08 (corresponding to the monoamine receptor anchoring point) and TyrVII:10 (corresponding to the retinal attachment site in rhodopsin). Chemokine agonism was independent of this aromatic zipper. It is proposed that in rhodopsin-like 7TM receptors, small-molecule compounds in general act as agonists in a similar manner as here demonstrated with the artificial, metal ion site anchored chelators, by holding TM-VI bent inward.

Helix 8 of the Viral Chemokine Receptor ORF74 Directs Chemokine Binding

The constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptor and viral oncogene ORF74, encoded by Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (human herpesvirus 8), binds a broad range of chemokines, including CXCL1 (agonist), CXCL8 (neutral ligand), and CXCL10 (inverse agonist). Although chemokines interact with the extracellular N terminus and loops of the receptor, we demonstrate that helix 8 (Hx8) in the intracellular carboxyl tail (C-tail) of ORF74 directs chemokine binding. Partial deletion of the C-tail resulted in a phenotype with reduced constitutive activity but intact regulation by ligands. Complete deletion of the C-tail, including Hx8, resulted in an inactive phenotype that lacks CXCL8 binding sites and has an increased number of binding sites for CXCL10. Similar effects were obtained with the single R7.61(322)W or Q7.62(323)P mutations in Hx8. We propose that the conserved charged or polar side chain at position 7.61 has a specific role in stabilizing the end of transmembrane domain 7 (TM7). Disruption of Hx8 by deletion or mutation distorts an H-bonding network, involving highly conserved amino acids within TM2, TM7, and Hx8, that is crucial for positioning of the TM domains, coupling to Galphaq, and CXCL8 binding. Thus, Hx8 appears to exert a key role in receptor stabilization through the conserved residue R7.61, directing the ligand binding profile of ORF74 and likely also that of other class A G-protein-coupled receptors.

Coupling ligand structure to specific conformational switches in the beta2-adrenoceptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate a wide variety of physiological functions in response to structurally diverse ligands ranging from cations and small organic molecules to peptides and glycoproteins. For many GPCRs, structurally related ligands can have diverse efficacy profiles. To investigate the process of ligand binding and activation, we used fluorescence spectroscopy to study the ability of ligands having different efficacies to induce a specific conformational change in the human beta2-adrenoceptor (beta2-AR). The 'ionic lock' is a molecular switch found in rhodopsin-family GPCRs that has been proposed to link the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane domains 3 and 6 in the inactive state. We found that most partial agonists were as effective as full agonists in disrupting the ionic lock. Our results show that disruption of this important molecular switch is necessary, but not sufficient, for full activation of the beta2-AR.

The seventh transmembrane domains of the delta and kappa opioid receptors have different accessibility patterns and interhelical interactions

We applied the substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) to map the residues of the transmembrane helices (TMs) 7 of delta and kappa opioid receptors (deltaOR and kappaOR) that are on the water-accessible surface of the binding-site crevices. A total of 25 consecutive residues (except C7.38) in the TMs 7 were mutated to Cys, one at a time, and each mutant was expressed in HEK 293 cells. Most mutants displayed similar binding affinity for [(3)H]diprenorphine, an antagonist, as the wild types. Pretreatment with (2-aminoethyl)methanethiosulfonate (MTSEA) inhibited [(3)H]diprenorphine binding to eight deltaOR and eight kappaOR mutants. All mutants except deltaOR L7.52(317)C were protected by naloxone from the MTSEA effect, indicating that the side chains of V7.31(296), A7.34(299), I7.39(304), L7.41(306), G7.42(307), P7.50(315), and Y7.53(318) of deltaOR and S7.34(311), F7.37(314), I7.39(316), A7.40(317), L7.41(318), G7.42(319), Y7.43(320), and N7.49(326) of kappaOR are on the water-accessible surface of the binding pockets. Combining the SCAM data with rhodopsin-based molecular models of the receptors led to the following conclusions. (i) The residues of the extracellular portion of TM7 predicted to face TM1 are sensitive to MTSEA in kappaOR but are not in deltaOR. Thus, TM1 may be closer to TM7 in deltaOR than in kappaOR. (ii) MTSEA-sensitive mutants start at position 7.31(296) in deltaOR and at 7.34(311) in kappaOR, suggesting that TM7 in deltaOR may have an additional helical turn (from 7.30 to 7.33). (iii) There is a conserved hydrogen-bond network linking D2.50 of the NLxxxD motif in TM2 with W6.48 of the CWxP motif in TM6. (iv) The NPxxY motif in TM7 interacts with TM2, TM6, and helix 8 to maintain receptors in inactive states. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first such comparison of the structures of two highly homologous GPCRs.