Effect of oral tacrolimus (FK 506) on steroid-refractory moderate/severe ulcerative colitis

Long-term effect of tacrolimus therapy in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Little is known about long-term outcome of tacrolimus therapy for ulcerative colitis. Aim To evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in Japanese patients with refractory ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with UC refractory to conventional therapy were administered tacrolimus with trough whole-blood levels of 10-15 ng/mL to induce remission and 5-10 ng/mL to maintain remission. Median treatment duration was 11 months (1-39 months) and median follow-up duration was 17 months (2-65 months). Evaluation of the clinical response was based on a modified Truelove-Witts severity index (MTWSI).

RESULTS

Tacrolimus produced a clinical response in 21 patients (77.8%), and remission was achieved in 19 of these 21 (70.4%) within 30 days. Overall cumulative colectomy-free survival was estimated as 62.3% at 65 months. In 18 of 19 patients treated with corticosteroids at the initiation of tacrolimus therapy, corticosteroids were discontinued or tapered. Adverse events were tremor (25.9%), renal function impairment (18.5%), infectious disease (14.8%), hot flashes (11.1%), hyperkalaemia (7.4%), headache (7.4%), epigastralgia (7.4%) and nausea (3.7%). No mortality occurred.

CONCLUSION

Long-term administration of tacrolimus appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for Japanese patients with refractory ulcerative colitis.

Tacrolimus (FK506) for induction of remission in refractory ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

There are a limited number of treatment options for patients with refractory ulcerative colitis. Animal models of inflammatory bowel disease and uncontrolled studies in humans suggest that tacrolimus may be effective treatment for ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of tacrolimus for induction of remission in patients with corticosteroid refractory ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE (PubMed), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the IBD/FBD review group specialized register and the ISI-Research Institute were searched (January 1997 to November 2007) to identify relevant studies all randomized trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Each author independently reviewed potentially relevant studies to determine eligibility based on the pre-specified criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A data extraction form was developed and used to extract data from included studies. Two authors independently extracted data. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan 4.2.9). The primary outcomes were induction of remission and clinical improvement, as defined by the studies and expressed as a percentage of the patients randomized (intention to treat analysis).

MAIN RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial comparing high target serum concentration and low target serum concentration tacrolimus versus placebo was identified and included in the review. Clinical remission was observed in 19% (4/21) of patients in the high target serum concentration group, in 9% (2/22) in the low target serum concentration group and in 5% (1/20) in the placebo group (OR 2.27; 95% CI 0.35 to 14.75). A statistically significant benefit for clinical improvement at two weeks was observed. Clinical improvement was observed in 62% (13/21) of patients in the high target serum concentration group, in 36% (8/22) in the low target serum concentration group and in 10% (2/20) in the placebo group (OR 8.66; 95% CI 1.79 to 42.00; RD 0.39; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.59; NNT = 3). Patients in the high serum target concentration group were significantly more likely than placebo patients to experience adverse events related to treatment (P = 0.043). Finger tremor (n = 6) was the most common adverse event in the tacrolimus group. Other adverse events included: gastroenteritis, sepsis, sleepiness, hot flush, headache, queasiness and stomach discomfort.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus may be effective for short-term clinical improvement in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of patients enrolled in the trial and other study limitations. Insufficient treatment and follow-up intervals prevent any conclusions with regard to long term safety and efficacy. The use of tacrolimus in the clinical setting requires careful consideration of risks versus benefits as well as close monitoring for adverse events. More data from well designed and controlled studies are needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus.

Therapeutic options in acute severe ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is a relapsing-remitting inflammatory disease affecting the colon and is associated with considerable morbidity. In acute severe attacks, there continues to be an associated mortality rate of 1-2%, even in specialist units. During an acute severe exacerbation, approximately two-thirds of patients will respond to intravenous corticosteroid therapy, the accepted first-line therapy in such cases. For steroid-refractory patients, options are limited to surgery (colectomy) or second-line agents, such as ciclosporin or infliximab, used in an attempt to salvage the colon. Considerable debate exists over the optimal management of such patients. During the last decade, an increased understanding of the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease has led to the rapid development of other biological agents, such as basiliximab and visilizumab. Novel methods, such as leucopheresis, have been studied and other established immunomodulatory agents, such as tacrolimus, have also been suggested. The purpose of this review is to highlight some of the areas of recent development in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis and review important safety data, with a particular emphasis on biological agents.

Quality of life of patients with ulcerative colitis: past, present, and future

Quality of life (QoL) is vitally important to patients with chronic illnesses such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and has been assessed in observational, cross-sectional, and cohort studies. However, relatively few clinical trials have evaluated the QoL of patients with UC. Recently, greater availability of the necessary tools has facilitated the undertaking of studies showing that QoL of patients with UC is reduced significantly compared with that of the general population. Studies using disease-specific instruments have identified disease severity as the strongest predictor of QoL, with other disease-related predictors including type of medical or surgical treatment and the efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability to patients of particular types of medical or surgical treatments. Other factors, such as comorbid medical or psychosocial problems and adherence to treatment, also affect QoL. Combined use of generic and disease-specific instruments in clinical trials can ensure that all clinically relevant unexpected events (generic instrument) and important improvement or deterioration (disease-specific instrument) are captured. For accurate outcomes assessment, the use of comprehensively validated instruments is critical. The need for the development and evaluation of new instruments will be determined by the mechanisms and targets of novel therapies. Ultimately, QoL assessment of effective therapies will play a strong role in pharmacoeconomic evaluations, providing health policy makers with the evidence to support the treatments that can most effectively normalize QoL through complete symptom resolution, minimal side effects, and convenient administration.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in refractory ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The published experience regarding the use of tacrolimus in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to more commonly used medical therapy has been fairly limited. Our objective was to describe our experience with its use in a cohort of patients which, to our knowledge, represents the largest North American cohort described to date.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center chart analysis. Patients were identified by compiling all hospital discharges with principle diagnoses of ICD-9 codes for 555.0-555.9 (regional enteritis) and 556.0-556.9 (ulcerative colitis) from January 1, 2000, to October 31, 2005, and then cross-referencing the electronic charts for tacrolimus serum concentrations ordered during this time period. Additional patients were identified through verbal communication with participating clinicians. Information abstracted included proportion with clinical response and remission (using a modified disease activity index), ability to wean from steroids, need for surgery / time to surgery, and side-effect profile.

RESULTS

In all, 32 UC patients and 15 CD patients were identified. The mean disease duration was: UC 81 months (range, 1 month to 37 years), CD 100 months (range, 1 month to 35 years). The disease distribution for UC was: pancolitis 12 (37.5%), extensive colitis 6 (18.8%), left-sided 11 (34.4%), and proctitis 3(9.4%). For CD this was: TI 2 (13.3%), small bowel 2 (13.3%), colonic 3 (20.7%), ileocolonic 7(46.7%), and perianal 1 (6.7%). The duration of tacrolimus treatment for UC was mean, 29 weeks. For CD it was mean, 9.9 weeks. In all, 30/32 UC and 7/15 CD patients were on steroids; 4/30 UC and 0/7 CD patients were able to subsequently wean off steroids. In all, 12/32 UC patients proceeded to colectomy. Mean time to colectomy was 28 weeks and 6/15 CD patients proceeded to a resective surgery. The mean time to surgery was 22 weeks. In all, 22/32 UC patients achieved a clinical response; 3/32 achieved remission and 8/15 CD patients achieved a clinical response; 1/15 achieved remission. Adverse reactions were generally mild. In 6 patients the drug had to be discontinued because of an adverse reaction. There were no opportunistic infections identified, no cases of renal insufficiency related to drug administration, and no deaths while on the medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience with tacrolimus in UC and CD indicates that it is safe and relatively well tolerated, although its clinical efficacy is quite variable. More prospective studies assessing its use are necessary.

The use of tacrolimus in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine production and T-cell activation. These immunosuppressant effects have been used to treat inflammatory bowel disease, especially fistulising Crohn's disease and refractory ulcerative colitis. The more predictable oral bioavailability and better side-effect profile makes tacrolimus a more favourable choice as compared with ciclosporin. Dose-dependent side effects, such as nephrotoxicity, are reported but are mostly reversible with dose reduction or cessation of therapy. Topical tacrolimus has also been used to treat pyoderma gangrenosum, an extra-intestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease. Tacrolimus is well-tolerated and should be considered as an alternative agent in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, especially those intolerant or refractory to the more conventional immunomodulators.

Review article: the management of steroid dependency in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of patients with ulcerative colitis have a chronic active disease often requiring several courses of systemic steroids in order to achieve remission, but followed by relapse of symptoms during steroid tapering or soon after their discontinuation. Although short term control of symptoms can be achieved with steroid treatment, this pattern of drug response, known as steroid-dependency, leads to important complications of the treatment, while a significant proportion of patients requires colectomy.

AIM

To review the studies currently available specifically evaluating the management of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis.

RESULTS

The clinical and biological mechanisms of steroid-dependency are not well understood compared with those determining steroid-refractoriness. Very few evidence-based data are available concerning the management of patients with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. The therapeutic role of aminosalicylates, thiopurines, methotrexate, infliximab, leukocyte apheresis and other drugs in the treatment of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis are evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of studies in steroid-refractory patients may not be applicable to steroid-dependency. Trials are needed to define the correct approaches and new strategies to ameliorate the therapy of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis.

Oral tacrolimus for steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis in children

PURPOSE

To evaluate tacrolimus in 3 situations: for the induction of remission in children with severe steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis (UC); for steroid sparing in children with steroid-dependent UC in whom treatment with other immunosuppressants fails; and for the maintenance of remission in children with steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant UC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 18 consecutive patients (13 with pancolitis) who were treated with oral tacrolimus at our institution from May 1999 to October 2005. Nine patients had steroid-resistant UC and 9 patients were steroid-dependent. We started patients initially on tacrolimus 0.2 mg/kg divided twice daily, with a goal plasma trough level of 10 to 15 ng/mL for the first 2 weeks, and then titrated doses to achieve plasma levels between 7 and 12 ng/mL after induction.

RESULTS

Of the 18 patients in this study, 17 showed a positive response to tacrolimus therapy (ie, cessation of diarrhea and other symptoms) and 5 showed a prolonged response to tacrolimus. The mean time from initiation of tacrolimus therapy until response was 8.5 days. The mean duration of response was 260 days. Eleven of 18 patients required colectomy, including all of the patients with steroid-resistant UC, but only 2 of 9 who were steroid-dependent. The mean time from initiation of tacrolimus until colectomy was 392 days.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible that tacrolimus may benefit selected patients with steroid-dependent UC, including those who are intolerant of 6-mercaptopurine or azathioprine. Conversely, patients with steroid-resistant UC are unlikely to sustain a prolonged clinical response to tacrolimus and seem to require colectomy eventually. Careful considerations of risk versus benefit, as well as close monitoring for adverse effects, are essential in all patients.

Study on the Colon Specific Delivery of Prednisolone Using Chitosan Capsules

In this study, we examined the effectiveness of chitosan capsules for the colon-specific delivery of prednisolone in rats. We also evaluated the effectiveness and side effects of prednisolone using chitosan capsules compared with the conventional dosage form (gelatin capsules). We found a significant increase in the concentration of prednisolone in the large intestinal mucosa when prednisolone was administered orally using chitosan capsules, as compared with the case using gelatin capsules. On the other hand, the plasma concentrations of prednisolone after oral administration using chitosan capsules were much lower than those in the case of gelatin capsules. We also assessed the effectiveness of prednisolone for the healing of trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis by measuring myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and colon wet weight/body weight (C/B) ratio. MPO activities and C/B ratios were significantly reduced when prednisolone was administered orally using chitosan capsules, in comparison with the case of gelatin capsules. Moreover, the weight of the thymus, which is an index of the side effects of prednisolone, markedly decreased after oral administration of prednisolone using gelatin capsules, whereas its weight did not change as much when prednisolone was administered orally using chitosan capsules. These findings indicate that chitosan capsules might be useful for the colon-specific delivery of prednisolone and its enhanced effectiveness for the healing of colitis in rats. Moreover, chitosan capsules might be also effective in reducing the side effects of prednisolone due to its decreased intestinal transfer to the systemic circulation.

Medium-term results of oral tacrolimus treatment in refractory inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral tacrolimus in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) refractory to conventional therapy, including azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and infliximab.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients with IBD treated with oral tacrolimus was undertaken. Tacrolimus was administered t an initial dose of 0.05 mg/kg twice daily, aiming for serum trough levels of 5-10 ng/mL. We evaluated clinical response, a retrospective estimated Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) for Crohn's disease (CD), modified Truelove-Witts index for ulcerative colitis (UC), and modified pouch disease activity index (mPDAI) for pouchitis. Patients had been monitored clinically for benefit and side effects and by whole blood tacrolimus level approximately every 4 weeks for the duration of treatment. Clinical remission was defined as an estimated CDAI <150 (CD), an inactive disease score on the Truelove-Witts index (UC), and mPDAI <5 (pouchitis).

RESULTS

Twelve patients with CD, six with UC, and one with pouchitis, all resistant to previous therapies, were treated for a median of 5 months. After 4 weeks 10 CD (83%), four UC (67%) patients, and one pouchitis patient had a clinical response. There was a median reduction of the estimated CDAI of 108 points (range 35-203; P = 0.002) and stool frequency of three per day at week 4. Remission was achieved in 42% (5/12) of CD and 50% (3/6) of UC patients at the end of follow-up. Side effects included temporary elevated creatinine (n = 1), tremor (n = 3), arthralgia (n = 1), insomnia (n = 1), and malaise (n = 1). Four patients discontinued treatment due to side effects. CONCLUSION-: Oral tacrolimus is well tolerated and effective in patients with refractory IBD in the short- to medium-term. Further controlled, long-term evaluation is warranted.

Current therapy of inflammatory bowel disease in children

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) are chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases that can present as bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, and malnutrition. Collectively, these disorders are referred to as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). All patients with IBD share a common pathophysiology. However, there are a number of developmental, psychosocial, and physiologic issues that are unique to the approximate, equals 20% of patients that present during childhood or adolescence. These include the possibility of disease-induced delays in linear growth or physical development, differences in drug dosing, and the changes in social and cognitive development that occur as children move from school-age years into adolescence and early adulthood. Gastroenterologists caring for these children must therefore develop an optimal regimen of pharmacologic therapies, nutritional management, psychologic support, and properly timed surgery (when necessary) that will maintain disease remission, minimize disease and drug-induced adverse effects, and optimize growth and development. This article reviews current approaches to the management of patients with UC and CD and highlights issues specific to the treatment of children with IBD. The principal medical therapies used to induce disease remission in patients with UC are aminosalicylates (for mild disease), corticosteroids (for moderate disease), and cyclosporine (ciclosporin) (for severe disease). If a patient responds to the induction regimen, maintenance therapies that are used to prevent disease relapse include aminosalicylates, mercaptopurine, and azathioprine. Colectomy with creation of an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (J pouch) has become the standard of care for patients with severe or refractory colitis and results in an improved quality of life in most patients. Therefore, the risks associated with using increasingly potent immunosuppressant agents must be balanced in each case against a patient's desire to retain their colon and avoid a temporary or potentially permanent ileostomy. Decisions about drug therapy in the management of patients with CD are more complex and depend on both the location (e.g. gastroduodenal vs small intestinal vs colonic), as well as the behavior of the disease (inflammatory/mucosal vs stricturing vs perforating) in a given patient. Induction therapies for CD typically include aminosalicylates and antibiotics (for mild mucosal disease), nutritional therapy (including elemental or polymeric formulas), corticosteroids (for moderate disease), and infliximab (for corticosteroid-resistant or fistulizing disease). Aminosalicylates, mercaptopurine, azathioprine, methotrexate, and infliximab can be used as maintenance therapies. Because surgical treatment of CD is not curative, it is typically reserved for those patients either with persistent symptoms and disease limited to a small section of the intestine (e.g. the terminal ileum and cecum) or for the management of complications of the disease including stricture or abdominal abscess. When surgery is necessary, maintenance medications administered postoperatively will postpone recurrence. Patients with UC and CD are at risk for the development of micronutrient deficiencies (including folate, iron, and vitamin D deficiencies) and require close nutritional monitoring. In addition, patients with UC and CD involving the colon are at increased risk of developing colon cancer, and should be enrolled into a colonoscopy surveillance program after 8-10 years of disease duration.

Rescue therapy with tacrolimus for a patient with severe ulcerative colitis refractory to combination leukocytapheresis and high-dose corticosteroid therapy

A19-year-old man complaining of severe diarrhea and hematochezia was admitted to our hospital. Endoscopic findings and laboratory data revealed that he had ulcerative colitis (UC). Despite combination therapy with high-dose corticosteroids and intensive granulocytapheresis, his condition did not improve. Therefore, we initiated tacrolimus therapy. Intravenous administration of tacrolimus with a trough level of 10 to 15 ng/ml relieved his abdominal symptoms within 1 week. The patient experienced no UC relapse 1 year after treatment with oral tacrolimus. Tacrolimus is a promising therapy for patients with UC refractory to the combination of high-dose corticosteroids and leukocytapheresis.

Drug insight: novel small molecules and drugs for immunosuppression

Gastrointestinal diseases can result from the inadequate or excessive response of the immune system to self or innocuous antigens. Moreover, the physiologic activation of the immune system against non-self antigens is a major clinical problem in liver organ transplantation. At present, many drugs are available that suppress the activation of the immune system, although most of the currently used immunosuppressive drugs lack specificity in terms of their molecular targets and, therefore, have the potential to generate numerous side effects. The advances that have been made in understanding the molecular events that underlie the activation of the immune system have led to the development of a new generation of 'small molecules' that are endowed with immunosuppressive properties and can serve as immunomodulatory agents. Among these new small molecules, inhibitors of Janus kinase 3, p21-Rac1 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase represent the most innovative approach to immunosuppression, and could be a promising alternative to current immunosuppressive therapies. Here, we report on the progress that has been made in the development of small molecules in the field of gastroenterology.

Review article: saving the colon in severe colitis - the case for medical therapy

The choice between ciclosporin (CsA), infliximab (IFX) and surgery for severe colitis not responding to intensive intravenous treatment, is challenging. With the advent of vislizumab and alternatives such as tacrolimus or leucocytapheresis, decisions will get harder. This article reviews the evidence for each intervention, draws attention to disparities in the definition of severe colitis between different trials and gives practical guidance. Early medical decision making is critical. Standard intensive treatment with intravenous steroids is still the first-line approach. Progress should be monitored objectively using a simple predictive index. Rescue therapy with CsA (oral 5 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg iv) or IFX (5 mg/kg) should be started on the third day of intensive treatment if predictive factors are poor (e.g. C-reactive protein > 45 mg/L). Physicians should discuss with their patients that there is just one attempt at rescue therapy, because only one patient death, as a consequence of delayed colectomy, changes the balance of benefit between medicine and surgery.

The role of tacrolimus in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review

Therapeutic management of inflammatory bowel disease remains beyond the limits of conventional therapy in many cases. Novel therapies used include tacrolimus, a new powerful immunosuppressive drug, employed in some case reports and a few studies that have tried to evaluate its effectiveness in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis with promising results, but its role in the management of inflammatory bowel disease remains controversial. We performed a systematic review that analyzed a total of 23 reported experiences in 286 patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with tacrolimus. Although most of the published studies are uncontrolled, short, and heterogeneous, promising results have been obtained in fistulizing disease, unresponsive cases of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, and even extraintestinal manifestations. The overall outcome was good enough to consider tacrolimus as a rationale therapeutic option. However, comparative studies with standard therapeutic options like infliximab are needed to assess the correct role that tacrolimus may play in these patients.

[Tacrolimus in the treatment of refractory moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease]

INTRODUCTION

The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oral tacrolimus in patients with active moderate-to-severe luminal IBD, mainly those refractory to steroids. Secondary endpoints were surgery requirements during follow-up, the percentage of patients achieving steroid withdrawal, and treatment safety.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Nineteen patients were included. The main indication for tacrolimus therapy was steroid resistance. The mean duration of treatment was 11 (range 3- 13) and 15 (range 4-44) months in patients with UC and CD, respectively. Remission was evaluated at weeks 4, 8 and 24 from the start of treatment, using the Harvey-Bradshaw index and the Truelove-Witts criteria for CD and UC patients, respectively, and acute- phase reactants (Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein). Steroid withdrawal, need for surgery, and previous and concomitant medication were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 47%, 66% and 41% of the patients were in complete remission at weeks 4, 8 and 24, respectively. Steroid withdrawal was achieved in 50% of the patients. Among patients who could not undergo complete steroid withdrawal, steroid therapy was reduced to a mean prednisone dose of 12.5 mg /day (range 10-15 mg). Surgery was required in 16% (mean follow-up of 38 months). Adverse effects occurred in 63% patients, who improved with dose reduction; none of the patients required tacrolimus withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral tacrolimus could be a safe, effective and useful option in patients with refractory IBD.

Management of refractory ulcerative colitis

A physician's approach to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who are refractory to standard first-line therapies must be thoughtful and systematic and include the individual's physical and emotional state as the physician examines the various dietary, medical, and surgical options currently available. It is of foremost importance to confirm that the refractory patient's symptoms are not simply due to dietary indiscretion, concomitant bowel infection (especially with Clostridium difficile), an incorrect diagnosis (eg, colitis due to infection, NSAIDs, ischemia, diverticulitis, or Crohn's disease), or even a concomitant diagnosis (eg, celiac sprue, pancreatic insufficiency, functional bowel disorder, laxative or sorbitol intake). The ability to quickly assess the status of the colonic mucosa with flexible sigmoidoscopy aids in the ability to distinguish patients with refractory inflammation from those with other diagnoses. The initiation and optimization of the long-term purine analogues azathioprine (AZA) or 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) remain the backbone of medical therapy for patients with refractory UC. For those unresponsive to corticosteroids, quicker induction of remission may necessitate infliximab, cyclosporine, or tacrolimus. Successful induction and maintenance with AZA, 6-MP, and/or infliximab should be followed by long-term therapy with these agents. Cessation of therapy often leads to relapse. Novel therapies under investigation hold the promise of offering more options for both the induction and maintenance of remission in refractory UC patients. Discussions of surgical intervention should not be put off as a last resort but rather included in the overall treatment plan offered to the patient.

Inflammatory bowel disease after liver transplantation: risk factors for recurrence and de novo disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and can recur or develop de novo after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and severity of IBD after liver transplantation and to perform a multivariate analysis for possible risk factors. In this retrospective study, 91 patients transplanted for PSC or AIH, without prior colectomy, were included. Sixty patients were transplanted for PSC, 31 for AIH. IBD activity before and after OLT and other possible risk factors were analysed in a multivariate model. Forty-nine patients (54%) had IBD before OLT. Forty patients (44%) had active IBD after transplantation: recurrence in 32 and de novo in 8. Cumulative risk for IBD after OLT was 15, 39 and 54% after 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. In 59% of patients with IBD prior to OLT the disease was more active after transplantation. Risk factors for recurrent disease were: symptoms at time of OLT, short interval of IBD before OLT and use of tacrolimus. 5-aminosalicylates were protective. A cytomegalovirus positive donor/negative recipient combination increased the risk for de novo IBD.

Tacrolimus is safe and effective in patients with severe steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease--a long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

We and others have reported the use of tacrolimus in refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Little is known about its long-term efficacy and safety.

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational single center study the charts of 53 adult patients with steroid-dependent (n = 18) or steroid-refractory (n = 35) IBD, Crohn's disease (CD) (n = 11), ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 40), or pouchitis (PC) (n = 2) were reviewed. Tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg body weight per day) was administered orally in all and initially intravenously in 2 patients (0.01 mg/kg body weight per day), aiming for serum trough levels of 4-8 ng/mL. Forty-one of 53 (77.1%) patients were receiving concomitant azathioprine. The mean treatment duration was 25.2 +/- 4.6 SD months (0.43-164 months). Patients were followed for a mean of 39 +/- 4.1 SD months (5-164 months). Response was evaluated using a modified clinical activity index (M-CAI).

RESULTS

Thirty-one UC (78%), 10 CD (90.1%), and both PC (100%) patients experienced an immediate clinical response or went into remission at 30 days. A statistically significant drop on the M-CAI was documented for UC and CD patients. Nine UC patients (22.5%) underwent colectomy between 1.6 and 41.3 months following initiation. Mean colectomy-free survival was 104.8 +/- 15.5 (95% CI 74.4-135.2) months (limited to 164.4 months). Cumulative colectomy-free survival was estimated 56.5% at 43.8 months. Steroids were reduced or discontinued in 40 of 45 UC and CD patients (90%) taking steroids. Side effects included a temporary rise of creatinine (n = 4, 7.6%), tremor or paresthesias (n = 5, 9.4%), hyperkalemia (n = 1, 1.9%), hypertension (n = 1, 1.9%), and opportunistic infections (n = 2, 3.8%).

CONCLUSION

Long-term tacrolimus therapy appears safe and effective in refractory IBD.

Revisiting the immunomodulators tacrolimus, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil: their mechanisms of action and role in the treatment of IBD

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are thought to result from unopposed immune responses to normal gut flora in a genetically susceptible host. A variety of immunomodulating therapies are applied for the treatment of patients with IBDs. The first-line treatment for IBDs consists of 5-aminosalicylate and/or budesonide. However, these first-line therapies are often not suitable for continuous treatment or do not suffice for the treatment of severe IBD. Recently, efforts have been made to generate novel selective drugs that are more effective and have fewer side effects. Despite promising results, most of these novel drugs are still in a developmental stage and unavailable for clinical application. Yet, another class of established immunomodulators exists that is successful in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. While waiting for emerging novel therapies, the use of these more established drugs should be considered. Furthermore, one of the advantages of using established immunomodulators is the well-documented knowledge on the long-term side effects and on the mechanisms of action. In this review, the authors discuss 3 well-known immunomodulators that are being applied with increased frequency for the treatment of IBD: tacrolimus, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil. These agents have been used for many years as treatment modalities for immunosuppression after organ transplantation, for the treatment of cancer, and for immunomodulation in several other immune-mediated diseases. First, this review discusses the potential targets for immunomodulating therapies in IBDs. Second, the immunomodulating mechanisms and effects of the 3 immunomodulators are discussed in relationship to these treatment targets.

A higher dose requirement of tacrolimus in active Crohn's disease may be related to a high intestinal P-glycoprotein content

Tacrolimus, a relatively new therapeutic option for patients with corticosteroid-refractory Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, is a substrate for the apically directed efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Duodenal biopsy specimens obtained from a patient with corticosteroid-refractory Crohn's disease and with significantly higher-than-average tacrolimus dose requirements were analyzed for P-gp by Western blot. The P-gp content in this patient was more than double that in specimens obtained from 9 of 10 healthy subjects. Elevated intestinal P-gp could have resulted in decreased tacrolimus absorption, thereby leading to decreased blood concentration and decreased efficacy in this patient. The cause and prevalence of this phenomenon are unknown.

Significance of glucocorticoid receptor expression in colonic mucosal cells of patients with ulcerative colitis

AIM: Glucocorticoid (GC) resistant ulcerative colitis (UC) remains a serious disease and is difficult to manage. Although the molecular basis of GC insensitivity is still unknown, GC receptors (GRα and GRβ) may play an important role in it. This study was aimed to investigate the relationship between the expression of GRα and GRβ in colonic mucosal cells of patients with UC, the efficacy of GC therapy and the intensity of inflammation.

METHODS: Twenty-five cases of UC were classified into: GC sensitive (n = 16) and GC resistant (n = 9) cases. Patients consisted of mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 8) and severe (n = 11) cases. GRα and GRβ expression in colonic mucosal specimens were investigated by immunohistochemistry, and compared between GC resistant and sensitive groups, and also among various degrees of inflammation.

RESULTS: All cases were positive for GRα and GRβ expression. Both positive association between GRα expression and the response of UC to GC and strong negative association between GRβ expression and the response of UC to GC were identified. There was no significant association between GRα/GRβ expression and the degree of inflammation of UC.

CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that both GRα and GRβ may play an important role in the action of GC, and that GRβ functions as a dominant negative inhibitor of GRα. Expression of GRα and GRβ in colonic mucosal cells of patients with UC may serve as predictors of glucocorticoid response, but can not function as markers of inflammatory intensity.

Management of acute severe colitis

The management of acute severe ulcerative colitis depends on early recognition of the unwell patient with colitis, the prompt initiation of treatment and objective assessment of the likelihood of medical failure. This deters 'hopeful expectation' in an attempt to avoid surgery. Intravenous corticosteroids remain first-line therapy but are completely effective in only 40%, partially effective in 30% and around 30% come to colectomy. The decision to use ciclosporin or infliximab for those with a poor response to steroids should be made at an early stage, often 3 or 4 days after starting intensive therapy. Decision-making is becoming more difficult with agents such as visilizumab, tacrolimus and the technique of leucocytapheresis as further options. Nevertheless, intravenous corticosteroids and timely colectomy have reduced mortality from nearly 30% to < 1% in specialist centres. Ciclosporin has delayed the need for urgent colectomy in many patients, but long-term follow-up suggests the majority come to colectomy within 7 years. Long-term outcome with newer agents, including infliximab, is not yet known.

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW

The prevalence of early-onset inflammatory bowel disease has been on the rise, with children and adolescents currently accounting for approximately 30% of all patients with this condition. Remarkable new advances in diagnostic modalities and therapy for adults with inflammatory bowel disease, and further information about the role of genetics in determining susceptibility to disease make the review of the recent literature in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease more timely than ever.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the area of genetics, new studies provide strong evidence for genetic susceptibility to disease, and match genotype with phenotypic presentation. A few studies examine the use of noninvasive diagnostic modalities, such as MRI, and biomarkers (fecal lactoferrin) in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Remarkable new agents in therapy for adults with inflammatory bowel disease have been empirically administered to children with inflammatory bowel disease. The first attempts to systematically study the effects of these agents in children and adolescents are reviewed here. Furthermore, new studies revise our notion of surgical outcomes in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

SUMMARY

Although premature for clinical practice application, the role of genetic testing in determining disease susceptibility and assisting with prognosis and course of therapy is clearly evolving and needs further study. As new therapeutic agents join the available treatments of inflammatory bowel disease it is imperative to include pediatric patients in clinical trials. The goals of future studies will be to alter the natural history of early-onset inflammatory bowel disease, reduce the frequency of recurrences, and perhaps reduce requirements for surgical intervention.