Partial irradiation of the heart

Cardiovascular effects of breast cancer radiotherapy

Cardiac toxicity has been implicated as the primary reason for excess non-breast cancer mortality in early breast cancer radiotherapy studies. Refinements in radiotherapy techniques have allowed for a considerable reduction of this risk in the majority of breast cancer patients. Recent large population-based studies confirmed an increase of cardiovascular death risk in patients irradiated for cancer of the left breast and in individuals exposed to relatively low (hitherto believed to be of no cardiovascular disease risk) doses of radiation, such as atomic bomb survivors or patients treated for various benign conditions. The issue of potential radiation-related cardiac damage may also be assuming a new significance due to the widespread use of other cardiotoxic agents, such as anthracyclines, paclitaxel and trastuzumab. The aim of this review is to summarize and critically analyze the available evidence on the impact of ionizing radiation on the cardiovascular system, with special attention to recent data demonstrating previously unrecognized adverse effects. This review discusses the pathology of radiation-related cardiovascular disease, its clinical presentation, risk factors and methods of assessment, as well as technical developments minimizing cardiac exposure. Epidemiological data are presented on the incidence of radiation-induced heart disease and cardiovascular mortality in various populations of patients irradiated for breast cancer and in individuals exposed to low radiation doses. Additionally, non-cardiac radiation-related vascular morbidity and mortality in breast cancer patients are addressed.

Physical models and simpler dosimetric descriptors of radiation late toxicity

Predicting radiation damage to specific organs is becoming ever more challenging with the use of intensity-modulated beams, nonuniform dose distributions, partial organ irradiation, and interpatient and even intraorgan variations in radiation sensitivity. Data-based physical models can be of use in summarizing complicated dose-volume data to help describe clinical outcomes and ultimately aid in the prediction of clinical toxicity. This article attempts to provide a brief overview of the use of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models and other simple dose/volume metrics to describe a few clinically significant complications (either frequent or serious) associated with radiation therapy of the head and neck, thorax, and abdominal-pelvic regions. Specifically, it reviews the application of these methods for late toxicities of the parotid, lung, heart, spinal cord, liver, and rectum. It focuses on organ-specific NTCP parameters as well as simple dosimetric descriptors that might be used to help treatment plan evaluation in clinical practice.

Normal Tissue Tolerance Dose Metrics for Radiation Therapy of Major Organs

Late organ toxicity from therapeutic radiation is a function of many confounding variables. The total dose delivered to the organ and the volumes of organ exposed to a given dose of radiation are 2 important variables that can be used to predict the risk of late toxicity. Three-dimensional radiation planning enables accurate calculation of the volume of tissue exposed to a given dose of radiation, graphically depicted as a dose-volume histogram. Dose metrics obtained from this 3-dimensional dataset can be used as a quantitative measure to predict late toxicity. This review summarizes the published clinical data on the risk of late toxicity as a function of quantitative dose metrics and attempts to offer suggested dose constraints for radiation treatment planning.

Three-dimensional heart dose reconstruction to estimate normal tissue complication probability after breast irradiation using portal dosimetry

Irradiation of the heart is one of the major concerns during radiotherapy of breast cancer. Three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning would therefore be useful but cannot always be performed for left-sided breast treatments, because CT data may not be available. However, even if 3D dose calculations are available and an estimate of the normal tissue damage can be made, uncertainties in patient positioning may significantly influence the heart dose during treatment. Therefore, 3D reconstruction of the actual heart dose during breast cancer treatment using electronic imaging portal device (EPID) dosimetry has been investigated. A previously described method to reconstruct the dose in the patient from treatment portal images at the radiological midsurface was used in combination with a simple geometrical model of the irradiated heart volume to enable calculation of dose-volume histograms (DVHs), to independently verify this aspect of the treatment without using 3D data from a planning CT scan. To investigate the accuracy of our method, the DVHs obtained with full 3D treatment planning system (TPS) calculations and those obtained after resampling the TPS dose in the radiological midsurface were compared for fifteen breast cancer patients for whom CT data were available. In addition, EPID dosimetry as well as 3D dose calculations using our TPS, film dosimetry, and ionization chamber measurements were performed in an anthropomorphic phantom. It was found that the dose reconstructed using EPID dosimetry and the dose calculated with the TPS agreed within 1.5% in the lung/heart region. The dose-volume histograms obtained with EPID dosimetry were used to estimate the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for late excess cardiac mortality. Although the accuracy of these NTCP calculations might be limited due to the uncertainty in the NTCP model, in combination with our portal dosimetry approach it allows incorporation of the actual heart dose. For the anthropomorphic phantom, and for fifteen patients for whom CT data were available to test our method, the average difference between the NTCP values obtained with our method and those resulting from the dose distributions calculated with the TPS was 0.1% +/- 0.3% (1 SD). Most NTCP values were 1%-2% lower than those obtained using the method described by Hurkmans et al. [Radiother. Oncol. 62, 163-171 (2002)], using the maximum heart distance determined from a simulator image as a single pre-treatment parameter. A similar difference between the two methods was found for twelve patients using in vivo EPID dosimetry; the average NTCP value obtained with EPID dosimetry was 0.9%, whereas an average NTCP value of 2.2% was derived using the method of Hurkmans et al. The results obtained in this study show that EPID dosimetry is well suited for in vivo verification of the heart dose during breast cancer treatment, and can be used to estimate the NTCP for late excess cardiac mortality. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study using portal dosimetry to calculate a DVH and NTCP of an organ at risk.

EUCLID: an outcome analysis tool for high-dimensional clinical studies

Treatment management decisions in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are usually made based on the dose distributions in the target and surrounding normal tissue. These decisions may include, for example, the choice of one treatment over another and the level of tumour dose escalation. Furthermore, biological predictors such as tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), whose parameters available in the literature are only population-based estimates, are often used to assess and compare plans. However, a number of other clinical, biological and physiological factors also affect the outcome of radiotherapy treatment and are often not considered in the treatment planning and evaluation process. A statistical outcome analysis tool, EUCLID, for direct use by radiation oncologists and medical physicists was developed. The tool builds a mathematical model to predict an outcome probability based on a large number of clinical, biological, physiological and dosimetric factors. EUCLID can first analyse a large set of patients, such as from a clinical trial, to derive regression correlation coefficients between these factors and a given outcome. It can then apply such a model to an individual patient at the time of treatment to derive the probability of that outcome, allowing the physician to individualize the treatment based on medical evidence that encompasses a wide range of factors. The software's flexibility allows the clinicians to explore several avenues to select the best predictors of a given outcome. Its link to record-and-verify systems and data spreadsheets allows for a rapid and practical data collection and manipulation. A wide range of statistical information about the study population, including demographics and correlations between different factors, is available. A large number of one- and two-dimensional plots, histograms and survival curves allow for an easy visual analysis of the population. Several visual and analytical methods are available to quantify the predictive power of the multivariate regression model. The EUCLID tool can be readily integrated with treatment planning and record-and-verify systems.

Systemic adjuvant therapies and radiotherapy to the conserved breast: Strategies revisited

The rapid increase in the use of both radiotherapy and systemic therapy for patients with early breast cancer requires reconsideration of the strategies that have been used in the past for combining both treatments. In these considerations the impact of both radiotherapy as well as systemic therapy on local control and survival of breast cancer have to be considered. An important point for discussion has often been the sequencing of radiotherapy and systemic treatment. Nowadays the possibilities of trastuzumab for her-2 neu positive breast cancer leads to the question whether or not this can be combined with radiotherapy. Finally new possibilities of sophisticated radiotherapy approaches allow further minimizing the late toxicity of radiotherapy.

A theoretical approach to the problem of dose-volume constraint estimation and their impact on the dose-volume histogram selection

This paper outlines a theoretical approach to the problem of estimating and choosing dose-volume constraints. Following this approach, a method of choosing dose-volume constraints based on biological criteria is proposed. This method is called "reverse normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) mapping into dose-volume space" and may be used as a general guidance to the problem of dose-volume constraint estimation. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) are randomly simulated, and those resulting in clinically acceptable levels of complication, such as NTCP of 5 +/- 0.5%, are selected and averaged producing a mean DVH that is proven to result in the same level of NTCP. The points from the averaged DVH are proposed to serve as physical dose-volume constraints. The population-based critical volume and Lyman NTCP models with parameter sets taken from literature sources were used for the NTCP estimation. The impact of the prescribed value of the maximum dose to the organ, D(max), on the averaged DVH and the dose-volume constraint points is investigated. Constraint points for 16 organs are calculated. The impact of the number of constraints to be fulfilled based on the likelihood that a DVH satisfying them will result in an acceptable NTCP is also investigated. It is theoretically proven that the radiation treatment optimization based on physical objective functions can sufficiently well restrict the dose to the organs at risk, resulting in sufficiently low NTCP values through the employment of several appropriate dose-volume constraints. At the same time, the pure physical approach to optimization is self-restrictive due to the preassignment of acceptable NTCP levels thus excluding possible better solutions to the problem.

Local Therapy, Systemic Benefit: Challenging the Paradigm of Biological Predeterminism

This paper briefly reviews the historical evolution of paradigms that have been purported to characterise the clinical behaviour of breast cancer, with the intention of guiding treatment approaches. Results from randomised clinical trials and the explosion of knowledge in the area of cancer biology have discredited the monolithic paradigms that had dominated thinking about breast cancer in the past. Contemporary notions of breast cancer biology recognise that, although some cancers disseminate well before becoming clinically detectable, acquisition of a metastatic phenotype can occur at any point (or not at all) in the local evolution of the tumour. As a consequence, both systemic and timely local--regional therapies can be expected to influence disease dissemination and patient survival. This is consistent with results observed in clinical trials, overviews of which indicate that prevention of four local recurrences will, on the average, prevent one death from breast cancer. Optimisation of local-regional treatment is an important goal in breast cancer management.

Cardiac function after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: comparison of heart dose-volume histogram parameters to multiple gated acquisition scan changes

In this paper we determine if preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer leads to changes in cardiac ejection fraction. This is a retrospective review of 20 patients treated at our institution for esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2002. Multiple gated acquisition cardiac scans were obtained before and after platinum-based chemoradiation (50.4 Gy). Dose-volume histograms for heart, left ventricle and left anterior descending artery were analyzed. Outcomes assessed included pre- and postchemoradiation ejection fraction ratio and percentage change in ejection fraction postchemoradiation. A statistically significant difference was found between median prechemoradiation ejection fraction (59%) and postchemoradiation ejection fraction (54%) (P = 0.01), but the magnitude of the difference was not clinically significant. Median percentage volume of heart receiving more than 20, 30 and 40 Gy were 61.5%, 58.5% and 53.5%, respectively. Our data showed a clinically insignificant decline in ejection fraction following chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. We did not observe statistically or clinically significant associations between radiation dose to heart, left ventricle or left anterior descending artery and postchemoradiation ejection fraction.

Cardiac complications of radiation therapy

AIMS

To present an overview of cardiac complications arising from radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline the (February 2004) and Embase (1974 to February 2004) searches of the medical literature relating to the cardiac complications of radiotherapy were conducted.

RESULTS

Radiation damage may affect the pericardium, myocardium or coronary vasculature, and consists of fibrotic or small vessel damage. Cardiac complications are a particular problem with radiation treatments to the mediastinum and breast, especially when greater than 65% of the heart is irradiated. Most of the literature relates to the treatment of Hodgkin's disease, as patients with this disease tend to be young and live long enough to manifest late cardiac complications. Pericarditis, angina, myocardial infarction and arrhythmias are the most frequent causes of morbidity, with myocardial infarction being the most common fatal complication. The incidence of ischaemic heart disease does not increase rapidly until 10 years from treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Much of the evidence relates to the use of outdated radiation therapy equipment and techniques. Today's patients almost certainly have a lower risk of cardiac complications. Cardiac complications are probably under-reported, as they occur long after cured patients have been discharged from follow-up.

Coronary heart disease after radiotherapy for peptic ulcer disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease after radiotherapy (RT) for peptic ulcer disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Peptic ulcer disease patients treated with RT (n = 1859) or by other means (n = 1860) at the University of Chicago Medical Center between 1936 and 1965, were followed through 1997. The observed numbers of cause-specific deaths were compared with the expected numbers from the general population rates. During RT, 5% of the heart was in the treatment field and the remainder of the heart mostly received scattered radiation. A volume-weighted cardiac dose was computed to describe the average tissue dose to the entire organ. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to analyze the CHD and cerebrovascular disease risk associated with RT, adjusting for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Greater than expected CHD mortality was observed among the irradiated patients. The irradiated patients received volume-weighted cardiac doses ranging from 1.6 to 3.9 Gy and the portion of the heart directly in the field received doses of 7.6-18.4 Gy. The CHD risk increased with the cardiac dose (p trend = 0.01). The cerebrovascular disease risk was not associated with the surrogate carotid dose.

CONCLUSION

The excess CHD risk in patients undergoing RT for peptic ulcer disease decades previously indicates the need for long-term follow-up for cardiovascular disease after chest RT.

A dose-volume-based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans

External beam radiotherapy is commonly used for patients with cancer. While tumor shrinkage and palliation are frequently achieved, local control and cure remain elusive for many cancers. With regard to local control, the fundamental problem is that radiotherapy‐induced normal tissue injury limits the dose that can be delivered to the tumor. While intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows for the delivery of higher tumor doses and the sparing of proximal critical structures, multiple competing plans can be generated based on dosimetric and/or biological constraints that need to be considered/compared. In this work, an IMRT treatment plan evaluation and ranking tool, based on dosimetric criteria, is presented. The treatment plan with the highest uncomplicated target conformity index (TCI+) is ranked at the top. The TCI+ is a dose‐volume‐based index that considers both a target conformity index (TCI) and a normal tissue‐sparing index (NTSI). TCI+ is designed to assist in the process of judging the merit of a clinical treatment plan. To demonstrate the utility of this tool, several competing lung and prostate IMRT treatment plans are compared. Results show that the plan with the highest TCI+ values accomplished the competing goals of tumor coverage and critical structures sparing best, among rival treatment plans for both treatment sites. The study demonstrates, first, that dose‐volume‐based indices, which summarize complex dose distributions through a single index, can be used to automatically select the optimal plan among competing plans, and second, that this dose‐volume‐based index may be appropriate for ranking IMRT dose distributions.

PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Tf

Feasibility of optimizing the dose distribution in lung tumors using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography guided dose prescriptions

The information provided by functional images may be used to guide radiotherapy planning by identifying regions that require higher radiation dose. In this work we investigate the dosimetric feasibility of delivering dose to lung tumors in proportion to the fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose activity distribution from positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). The rationale for delivering dose in proportion to the tumor FDG-PET activity distribution is based on studies showing that FDG uptake is correlated to tumor cell proliferation rate, which is shown to imply that this dose delivery strategy is theoretically capable of providing the same duration of local control at all voxels in tumor. Target dose delivery was constrained by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) maps of normal lung perfusion, which restricted irradiation of highly perfused lung and imposed dose-function constraints. Dose-volume constraints were imposed on all other critical structures. All dose-volume/function constraints were considered to be soft, i.e., critical structure doses corresponding to volume/function constraint levels were minimized while satisfying the target prescription, thus permitting critical structure doses to minimally exceed dose constraint levels. An intensity modulation optimization methodology was developed to deliver this radiation, and applied to two lung cancer patients. Dosimetric feasibility was assessed by comparing spatially normalized dose-volume histograms from the nonuniform dose prescription (FDG-PET proportional) to those from a uniform dose prescription with equivalent tumor integral dose. In both patients, the optimization was capable of delivering the nonuniform target prescription with the same ease as the uniform target prescription, despite SPECT restrictions that effectively diverted dose from high to low perfused normal lung. In one patient, both prescriptions incurred similar critical structure dosages, below dose-volume/function limits. However, in the other patient, critical structure dosage from the nonuniform dose prescription exceeded dose-volume/function limits, and greatly exceeded that from the uniform dose prescription. Strict compliance to dose-volume/ function limits would entail reducing dose proportionality to the FDG-PET activity distribution, thereby theoretically reducing the duration of local control. Thus, even though it appears feasible to tailor lung tumor dose to the FDG-PET activity distribution, despite SPECT restrictions, strict adherence to dose-volume/function limits could compromise the effectiveness of functional image guided radiotherapy.

Radiation-induced heart disease after Hodgkin’s disease and breast cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

People with Hodgkin's disease and breast cancer often receive therapeutic irradiation to the chest (mediastinum) as an element of treatment. While the therapy often cures the malignancy, it has been implicated in causing late-onset heart disease that may influence the provision of dental treatment.

TYPE OF STUDIES REVIEWED

The authors conducted a MEDLINE search of the years 1995 through 2002 using the key terms "Hodgkin's disease," "breast cancer," "radiation therapy," "cardiac valves" and "coronary artery" to define the pathophysiology of the disorder, its epidemiology and dental implications. The articles they selected for further review included those published in English in peer-reviewed journals.

RESULTS

Therapeutic irradiation of the chest results in the inadvertent inclusion of the heart within the irradiation field. Over the next 10 to 20 years, some of these people may experience pathological changes of the heart valves that could predispose them to endocarditis, accelerated atherosclerosis of the coronary artery that heightens their risk of experiencing a fatal myocardial infarction or both.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Dentists need to identify patients who have received therapeutic irradiation to the chest and consult with the patients' physicians to determine whether the therapy has damaged the heart valves or coronary arteries. Patients with radiation-induced valvular disease may require prophylactic antibiotics when undergoing specific dental procedures that are known to cause a bacteremia and a heightened risk of developing endocarditis. Patients with radiation-induced coronary artery disease should be administered only limited amounts of local anesthetic agents containing a vasoconstrictor, and they may require the administration of sedative agents and cardiac medications to preclude ischemic episodes.

Initial clinical experience with moderate deep-inspiration breath hold using an active breathing control device in the treatment of patients with left-sided breast cancer using external beam radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION

We present our initial clinical experience using moderate deep-inspiration breath hold (mDIBH) with an active breathing control (ABC) device to reduce heart dose in the treatment of patients with early-stage, left-sided breast cancer using external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) limited to the whole breast.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between February and August 2002, 5 patients with Stages I/II left-sided breast cancer received EBRT limited to the whole breast using an ABC device. After standard virtual simulation, patients with >2% of the heart receiving >30 Gy in free breathing were selected. All patients underwent a training session with the ABC apparatus to determine their ability to comfortably maintain mDIBH at 75% of the maximum inspiration capacity. Three patients received 45 Gy to the whole breast in 25 fractions, and 2 patients received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. For each of the medial and lateral tangential beams, radiation was delivered during 2 or 3 breath hold durations that ranged from 18 to 26 s. "Step-and-shoot" intensity modulation was employed to achieve uniform dose distribution. Open beam segments were purposely delivered over 2 breath hold sessions and captured on electronic portal images to allow intra- and interfraction setup error analysis. All electronic portal images of the tangential beams were analyzed off-line using an in-house treatment verification tool to assess the anteroposterior, craniocaudal, and rotational uncertainties. Corrections were applied if necessary.

RESULTS

A comparison of treatment plans performed on breath-hold and free-breathing CTs showed that ABC treatments achieved a mean absolute reduction of 3.6% in heart volume receiving 30 Gy (heart V(30)) and 1.5% in the heart normal tissue complication probability. A total of 134 ABC treatment sessions were performed in the 5 patients. The average number of breath holds required per beam direction was 2.5 (4-6 per treatment) with a median duration of 22 s per breath hold (range: 10-26 s). Patients tolerated mDIBH well. The median treatment time was 18.2 min (range: 13-32 min), which was progressively shortened with increasing experience. A total of 509 portal images were analyzed. Combining measurements for all patients, the interfraction setup errors (1 SD) in the lateral and craniocaudal directions and in rotation were 2.4 mm, 3.2 mm, and 1 degrees, respectively, for the medial beam and 2.3 mm, 3.1 mm, and 1 degrees, respectively, for the lateral beam. For all patients, the intrafraction setup errors were about 1 mm and always less than 2 mm (1 SD).

CONCLUSION

Reduction in heart V(30) can be achieved in patients with left-sided breast cancer using mDIBH assisted with an ABC device. With increasing experience, ABC treatments were streamlined and could be performed within a 15-min treatment slot. Our results suggest that mDIBH using an ABC device may provide one of the most promising methods of improving the efficacy of EBRT in patients with left-sided breast cancer, particularly when wide tangential beams are employed. Breast cancer; Breath hold; Radiation therapy; Intensity modulated radiation therapy

Significant reductions in heart and lung doses using deep inspiration breath hold with active breathing control and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients treated with locoregional breast irradiation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the heart and lung sparing effects of moderate deep inspiration breath hold (mDIBH) achieved using an active breathing control (ABC) device, compared with free breathing (FB) during treatment with deep tangents fields (DT) for locoregional (LR) irradiation of breast cancer patients, including the internal mammary (IM) nodes (IMNs). To compare the DT-mDIBH technique to other standard techniques and to evaluate the dosimetric effect of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen patients (9 left-sided and 6 right-sided lesions) with Stages 0-III breast cancer underwent standard FB and ABC computed tomographic (CT) scans in the treatment position. A dosimetric planning study was performed. In FB, the 9 left-sided patients were planned with a 5-field technique where electron fields covering the IM region were matched to shallow tangents using wedges (South West Oncology Group [SWOG] protocol S9927 technique A). This method was compared with a 3-field DT technique covering the breast and the IMNs (SWOG S9927 technique B). Compensation with IMRT was then compared with wedges for each technique. For the 15 total patients, dosimetric planning using DT with IMRT was then reoptimized on the mDIBH CT data set for comparison. Dose-volume histograms for the clinical target volume (CTV) (including the IMNs), planning target volume (PTV), ipsilateral and contralateral breast, and organs at risk (OAR) were analyzed. In addition, normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for lung and heart, mean lung doses, and the number of monitor units (MUs) for a 1.8 Gy fraction were compared.

RESULTS

For the 9 left-sided patients, the mean percentage of heart receiving more than 30 Gy (heart V30) was lower with the 5-field wedged technique than with the DT wedged technique (6.8% and 19.1%, respectively, p < 0.004). For the DT technique, the replacement of wedges with IMRT slightly diminished the mean heart V30 to 16.3% (p < 0.51). The introduction of mDIBH to the DT-IMRT technique reduced the heart V30 by 81% to a mean of 3.1% (p < 0.0004). Compared with 5-field IMRT, DT-IMRT with mDIBH reduced the heart V30 for 6 of the 9 patients, entirely avoiding heart irradiation in 2 of these 6 patients. For DT-IMRT, mDIBH reduced the mean lung dose and NTCP to levels obtained with the 5-field IMRT technique. For the 15 patients planned with DT-IMRT in FB, the use of mDIBH reduced the mean percentage of both lungs receiving more than 20 Gy from 20.4% to 15.2% (p < 0.00007). With DT-IMRT, more than 5% of the contralateral breast received more than 10 Gy for 6 of the 9 left-sided patients in FB, 3 of those 9 patients in mDIBH, and only 1 of those 9 patients planned with 5 fields. The mean % of the PTV receiving more than 55 Gy (110% of the prescribed dose) was 36.4% for 5-field wedges, 33.4% for 5-field IMRT, 28.7% for DT-wedges, 12.5% for DT-IMRT, and 18.4% for DT-IMRT mDIBH. The CTV remained covered by the 95% isodose in all the DT plans but one (99.1% of the volume covered). DT-wedges required more MUs than DT-IMRT (mean of 645 and 416, respectively, p < 0.00004).

CONCLUSION

mDIBH significantly reduces heart and lung doses when DT are used for LR breast irradiation including the IMNs. Compared with shallow tangents matched with electrons, DT with mDIBH reduces the heart dose (in most patients) and results in comparable lung toxicity parameters, but may increase the dose to the contralateral breast. IMRT improves dose homogeneity, slightly reduces the dose to the heart, and diminishes the number of MUs required.

Radiation-associated cardiovascular disease

As the number of cancer survivors grows because of advances in therapy, it has become more important to understand the long-term complications of these treatments. This article presents the current knowledge of adverse cardiovascular effects of radiotherapy to the chest. Emphasis is on clinical presentations, recommendations for follow-up, and treatment of patients previously exposed to irradiation. Medline literature searches were performed, and abstracts related to this topic from oncology and cardiology meetings were reviewed. Potential adverse effects of mediastinal irradiation are numerous and can include coronary artery disease, pericarditis, cardiomyopathy, valvular disease and conduction abnormalities. Damage appears to be related to dose, volume and technique of chest irradiation. Effects may initially present as subclinical abnormalities on screening tests or as catastrophic clinical events. Estimates of relative risk of fatal cardiovascular events after mediastinal irradiation for Hodgkin's disease ranges between 2.2 and 7.2 and after irradiation for left-sided breast cancer from 1.0 to 2.2. Risk is life long, and absolute risk appears to increase with length of time since exposure. Radiation-associated cardiovascular toxicity may in fact be progressive. Long-term cardiac follow-up of these patients is therefore essential, and the range of appropriate cardiac screening is discussed, although no specific, evidence-based screening regimen was found in the literature.

Optimizing breast cancer treatment efficacy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To present our clinical experience using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to improve dose uniformity and treatment efficacy in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 281 patients with Stage 0, I, and II breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy received whole breast RT after lumpectomy using our static, multileaf collimator (sMLC) IMRT technique. The technical and practical aspects of implementing this technique on a large scale in the clinic were analyzed. The clinical outcome of patients treated with this technique was also reviewed.

RESULTS

The median time required for three-dimensional alignment of the tangential fields and dosimetric IMRT planning was 40 and 45 min, respectively. The median number of sMLC segments required per patient to meet the predefined dose-volume constraints was 6 (range 3-12). The median percentage of the treatment given with open fields (no sMLC segments) was 83% (range 38-96%), and the median treatment time was <10 min. The median volume of breast receiving 105% of the prescribed dose was 11% (range 0-67.6%). The median breast volume receiving 110% of the prescribed dose was 0% (range 0-39%), and the median breast volume receiving 115% of the prescribed dose was also 0%. A total of 157 patients (56%) experienced Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 0 or I acute skin toxicity; 102 patients (43%) developed Grade II acute skin toxicity and only 3 (1%) experienced Grade III toxicity. The cosmetic results at 12 months (95 patients analyzable) were rated as excellent/good in 94 patients (99%). No skin telengiectasias, significant fibrosis, or persistent breast pain was noted.

CONCLUSION

The use of intensity modulation with our sMLC technique for tangential whole breast RT is an efficient method for achieving a uniform and standardized dose throughout the whole breast. Strict dose-volume constraints can be readily achieved resulting in both uniform coverage of breast tissue and a potential reduction in acute and chronic toxicities. Because the median number of sMLC segments required per patient is only 6, the treatment time is equivalent to conventional wedged-tangent treatment techniques. As a result, widespread implementation of this technology can be achieved with minimal imposition on clinic resources and time constraints.

Lung cancer risks in women with previous breast cancer

Evaluation of the adverse effects of breast cancer treatment is becoming increasingly important in light of the earlier detection and prolonged survival of the patients. The beneficial effect of post-surgical radiotherapy has lately been challenged. The Swedish Cancer Registry (SCR) was used to identify approximately 141000 women with breast cancer, diagnosed between 1958 and 1997, followed-up for the occurrence of lung cancer. Standardised incidence ratios and expected number of lung cancers were calculated using incidence rates from the SCR. There were 613 subsequent lung cancers and a statistically significant increased risk of lung cancer was seen >5 years after breast cancer diagnosis, in contrast to a significantly decreased risk the first five years after the breast cancer diagnosis. The latter finding was confined to those >60 years of age when diagnosed with breast cancer. When restricting the analyses to those cases with information on the laterality of breast and lung cancer, an increased risk of a lung cancer on the same side as the breast cancer was seen >10 years after the breast cancer diagnosis. Birth cohorts with a higher smoking prevalence, i.e. 1930-1949, revealed a higher risk of lung cancer, than previous birth cohorts. Women with breast cancer have a significantly increased risk of developing a subsequent lung cancer possibly related to an interaction between radiotherapy and smoking.