Profilin is a relevant melon allergen susceptible to pepsin digestion in patients with oral allergy syndrome

Plant non-specific lipid transfer proteins as food and pollen allergens

Several members of the plant non-specific lipid transfer protein (LTP) family have been identified as relevant allergens in foods and pollens. These allergens are highly resistant to both heat treatment and proteolytic digestion. These characteristics have been related with the induction of severe systemic reactions in many patients, and with the possibility of being primary sensitizers by the oral route. A specific geographical distribution pattern of sensitization to LTP allergens has been uncovered. This allergen family is particularly important in the Mediterranean area, but shows a very limited incidence in Central and Northern Europe. The potential role in the plant, as well as the biochemical and allergenic properties of the LTP family, are reviewed here.

Advances in allergic skin disease, anaphylaxis, and hypersensitivity reactions to foods, drugs, and insect stings

This review highlights some of the research advances in allergic skin disease, anaphylaxis, and hypersensitivity reactions to foods, drugs, and insect venom that were reported primarily in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology from 2002 through 2003. Among the topics highlighted are new insights into the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis and potential strategies for more effective treatment of the atopic march. Patients should remain supine with raised legs during anaphylactic shock because upper body elevation could result in sudden death from loss of venous return to the heart. A major advance in food allergy was that humanized, monoclonal anti-IgE antibody showed protection against peanut-induced anaphylaxis. In addition to studies elucidating mechanisms of drug hypersensitivity, a clinical study showed patients with a history of prior penicillin allergy with negative penicillin allergy test results are unlikely to experience reactions or resensitization on subsequent oral courses of penicillin. Lastly, there are new recommendations for patients with convincing insect sting reaction histories but negative skin test responses to venom.

Clinical importance of cross-reactivity in food allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Review of recent developments in the field of cross-reactivity in food allergy and the clinical relevance of these developments.

RECENT FINDINGS

New foods have been added to the list of Bet v 1 and profilin-related food allergies. Clinical relevance of cross-reactions based on recognition of carbohydrate determinants and profilin is limited for the population of pollen-allergic patients as a whole. For selected food allergic patients, however, N-glycans and particularly profilin are potentially of clinical relevance. Lipid transfer proteins have further been established as clinically more severe allergens in several foods. This severity is attributed to their stability to proteolysis and processing. Storage proteins of several nuts and seeds have been identified as important allergens, but cross-reactivity between storage proteins of different foods appears to be limited. Using cross-reactivity as the basis for immunotherapy in food allergy seems promising but needs confirmation by double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

SUMMARY

The continued identification and characterization of cross-reactive allergens facilitates the study of factors determining clinical relevance of cross-reactivity and of possible efficacy of immunotherapy in food allergy.

Analysis of avocado allergen (Prs a 1) IgE-binding peptides generated by simulated gastric fluid digestion

BACKGROUND

Resistance to pepsin digestion has been claimed to be a characteristic of food allergens that can induce severe adverse reactions. Moreover, pepsin treatment is included in protocols to evaluate the potential allergenicity of transgenic foods. Allergenic plant class I chitinases, such as avocado Prs a 1, are the panallergens involved in the latex-fruit syndrome. Previous reports indicated their susceptibility to simulated gastric fluid (SGF) digestion.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the IgE-binding capacity and the in vivo reactivity of the SGF products of the avocado allergen Prs a 1.

METHODS

Patients with a clinical history of latex-fruit allergy syndrome, a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to Prs a 1, and specific IgE to avocado were selected. Untreated and SGF-digested Prs a 1 samples were analyzed by means of IgE and IgG immunoblotting, IgE immunoblotting and ELISA-inhibition assays, and SPTs. Peptides from SGF-digested samples were fractionated by means of HPLC, characterized by N-terminal amino acid sequencing and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization analysis, and tested for in vivo reactivity with SPTs.

RESULTS

Neither protein staining nor IgE immunoblotting with a pool of sera from allergic patients resulted in the detection of any band after SDS-PAGE separation of an SGF-digested sample of Prs a 1. However, this sample showed a similar inhibitory potency to that of untreated Prs a 1 in both immunoblot- and ELISA-inhibition assays (up to 70% inhibition of the IgE binding to crude avocado extract) and induced positive SPT responses in 5 of 8 allergic patients. Peptides from SGF-digested Prs a 1 were separated by means of HPLC, and 4 of them reached more than 50% inhibition values when using avocado extract as the solid phase in ELISA-inhibition assays. Reactive peptides were located both in the N-terminal hevein-like domain and in the catalytic domain of Prs a 1. Those corresponding to the hevein-like domain (approximately 5100 d) produced positive SPT responses in 5 of 8 allergic patients, whereas 2 peptides located in the catalytic domain (approximately 1400 and 2500 d) were reactive in 2 or 3 of the 8 patients.

CONCLUSION

Prs a 1 was extensively degradated when subjected to SGF digestion. However, the resulting peptides, particularly those corresponding to the hevein-like domain, were clearly reactive both in vitro and in vivo.

Peach profilin: cloning, heterologous expression and cross-reactivity with Bet v 2

BACKGROUND

Peach is among the main foods causing allergic reactions in the Mediterranean adult population. Only a single peach allergen, named Pru p 3, has been characterized. However, a potential role of profilin has also been suggested in grass pollen-associated allergy to peach.

METHODS

Complementary DNA clones for two different peach profilin isoforms were obtained by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction using non-degenerated primers. Expression of recombinant peach profilin was performed in Escherichia coli, and confirmed using rabbit polyclonal antibodies to sunflower pollen profilin. Twenty-nine individual sera from patients with peach allergy proved by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC), either with (n = 15) or without (n = 14) specific IgE to Bet v 2, were used in immunodetection assays to test recombinant peach profilin reactivity.

RESULTS

Each peach profilin cDNA included an open reading frame coding for a 131 amino acid protein. The peach profilin isoforms, designated Pru p 4.01 and Pru p 4.02, showed 80% of amino acid sequence identity, and were very similar (>70% identity) to allergenic profilins from plant foods and pollens. Recombinant Pru p 4.01 was expressed in E. coli as a nonfusion protein, displaying the expected molecular size and reacting with anti-profilin antibodies. rPru p 4.01 was recognized by all sera (15 of 15) with specific IgE to Bet v 2, whereas no sera (zero of 14) without IgE to this birch allergen reacted with rPru p 4.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Peach profilin Pru p 4 is very closed to other allergenic profilins from plant foods and pollens. A complete correlation between reactivity to rPru p 4 and rBet v 2 has been found in sera from peach allergic patients.