Activation of antigen-specific suppressor T cells by B cells from mice immunized with type III pneumococcal polysaccharide

NZB mouse system for production of monoclonal antibodies to weak bacterial antigens: isolation of an IgG antibody to the polysaccharide capsules of Escherichia coli K1 and group B meningococci

A system for the production of monoclonal antibodies, particularly of the IgG type, against weakly immunogenic bacterial polysaccharide antigens is described. This system, which is based on the autoimmune NZB mouse strain, has been used to produce a monoclonal IgG2a antibody against the meningococcus group B and Escherichia coli K1 polysaccharides, identical homopolymers of alpha (2----8)-linked units of N-acetylneuraminic acid that are extremely poor immunogens. Comparison of the humoral immune responses of normal BALB/c mice and autoimmune NZB mice to hyperimmunization with group A, B, and C meningococci showed that, although both strains mounted a weak meningococcal B polysaccharide-specific IgM response, only the NZB strain mounted an IgG response. Similarly, NZB mice mounted a stronger IgG response to the more immunogenic group C meningococcal polysaccharide than did BALB/c mice, although this difference was less pronounced than that observed with meningococcal B polysaccharide. No difference between the two strains of mice was demonstrable with the strongly antigenic group A meningococcal polysaccharide. These results indicate that the NZB system may be generally useful for the production of monoclonal antibodies against weakly antigenic bacterial determinants.

Immunological unresponsiveness in leprosy

The various forms of leprosy form a clinical and immunological spectrum which offers extraordinary possibilities for insight into immunoregulatory mechanisms in man. At one pole, tuberculoid leprosy, patients develop high levels of cell-mediated immunity which ultimately results in killing of bacilli in the tissues, albeit often with damage to nerves. At the lepromatous pole, patients exhibit selective immunological unresponsiveness to antigens of M. leprae. Even though all currently known protein species of M. leprae and BCG are cross-reactive, lepromatous patients unreactive to M. leprae antigens frequently respond strongly to tuberculin. In vitro experiments suggest the existence of lepromin-induced suppressor activity, mediated by both monocytes and T cells. The T suppressor cells have the T8 phenotype of which 50% express the activation markers, Ia and FcR. The one unique species of antigen of the leprosy bacillus is a phenolic glycolipid, and it appears that the TS cells largely recognize the terminal trisaccharide of this unique antigen. Depletion of the TS cells restores in vitro reactivity of lymphocytes to lepromin in a portion of lepromatous patients, and addition of IL-2-containing supernatants partially restores responsiveness to M. leprae antigens. Vaccination of lepromatous patients with a mixture of M. leprae and live BCG restores cell-mediated immunity in the majority of lepromatous patients, and concomitantly reduces the in vitro suppressor activity and number of activated T8 cells. These experiments suggest the existence of stage-of-disease related suppressor cells in leprosy which appear to block the responsiveness of TH capable of responding to either specific or cross-reactive mycobacterial antigens. The mode of action of these TS appears to be the inhibition of production of IL-2 and other lymphokines. Successful immunotherapeutic vaccination appears to overcome this block in the majority of patients.

Recognition of self and regulation of specificity at the level of cell populations

It is suggested that immunologic specificity and selective responsiveness, assayed by effector and memory cells, are, in part, determined by the existing repertoire of lymphocytes and, in part, by the dynamic nature of cellular growth. Clones within horizontal networks resemble competing species in a Darwinian world. Upon stimulation, the development of a clone is greatly affected, in a dynamic way, by factors that determine the balance between self-renewal and differentiation. Antigen is a major factor. The amount of antigen and the nature of encounter with the immune system (sudden, graded or continuous), through the selection of a particular subset of clones, can be correlated with a weak or a strong expression of effector function and with the generation of effective memory or of tolerance. The encounter with self antigens obeys the same rules. Thus, the distinction between self and non-self is a quantitative one, both at the single-cell level and at the systemic level. The encounter of developing lymphocytes with self antigens, and in particular with idiotypes and MHC-antigens, restricts the repertoire and imposes major constraints both on the mode of interaction with foreign antigens and on potential self-recognition networks. The proposed "dynamic scheme", differing from "structural schemes" in a number of fundamental aspects, calls for reevaluation of present concepts of immunoregulation and for reinterpretation of data.

Lectin-induced modulation of the antibody response to type III pneumococcal polysaccharide

Several lectins were tested for their capacity to alter the antibody response to type III pneumococcal polysaccharide (SSS-III). The antibody response was enhanced by concanavalin A (Con A), phytohemagglutinin (PHA), as well as lectins from Phytolacca americana (Pa-2), Pisum sativum (PSA), and Lens culinaris (LCH), when these lectins were given 2 days after immunization with SSS-III; however, suppression was obtained when Con A and Pa-2 were given at the time of immunization. By contrast the lectins from Vicia villosa (VVL) and Bauhinia purpurea (BPA) did not alter the antibody response. Since the lectins PSA and LCH bind to the same monosaccharide as Con A, whereas the other lectins bind to different monosaccharides, these findings indicate that there is no relationship between nominal monosaccharide specificity and the capacity to modulate the antibody response. Substantial increases in the magnitude of the IgG1 antibody response was noted after the administration of Con A whereas profound enhancement of IgG2a antibody response was noted after PHA was given.