ALIMTA (pemetrexed disodium) as second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

Second-line Therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Over the past three decades, progress has been made in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Current recommendations include combination chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy. Despite these advances, the majority of patients relapse after initial treatment. Many of these patients are eligible for second-line therapy, which has prompted significant clinical research in this area. In 1999, docetaxel became the first drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC in the second-line setting. In 2004, two additional agents, pemetrexed and erlotinib, also received approval, giving patients three options for second-line treatment. Many promising new drugs and drug combinations are currently under investigation.

Randomized phase II study of bortezomib alone and bortezomib in combination with docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib +/- docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 (arm A) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (arm B). A treatment cycle of 21 days comprised four bortezomib doses on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, plus, in arm B, docetaxel on day 1. Patients could receive unlimited cycles. The primary end point was response rate.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were treated, 75 in arm A and 80 in arm B. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Investigator-assessed response rates were 8% in arm A and 9% in arm B. Disease control rates were 29% in arm A and 54% in arm B. Median time to progression was 1.5 months in arm A and 4.0 months in arm B. One-year survival was 39% and 33%, and median survival was 7.4 and 7.8 months in arms A and B, respectively. Adverse effect profiles were as expected in both arms, with no significant additivity. The most common grade > or = 3 adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, and dyspnea (4% and 53%, 19% and 26%, and 17% and 14% of patients in arms A and B, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Bortezomib has modest single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced NSCLC using this schedule, with minor enhancement in combination with docetaxel. Additional investigation of bortezomib in NSCLC is warranted in combination with other drugs known to be active, or using different schedules.

Pemetrexed: a multitargeted antifolate

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration approved pemetrexed in February 2004 for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in combination with cisplatin in patients with unresectable disease or for whom curative surgery is not an option. Pemetrexed is the first agent approved for the treatment of MPM. In August 2004, pemetrexed was approved as a second-line, single-agent treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this article were to summarize the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of pemetrexed, and to review its current and potential roles in therapy for MPM, NSCLC, and other oncologic conditions.

METHODS

Relevant English-language literature was identified through searches of PubMed (1966-December 2004), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (January 1995-December 2004). Search terms included pemetrexed, Alimta, MTA, multitargeted antifolate, LY231514, mesothelioma, MPM, non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer. In addition to published literature, abstracts and posters presented at national and international scientific meetings were reviewed.

RESULTS

Myelosuppression was the predominant dose-limiting toxicity of pemetrexed reported in Phase I studies. Identification of the correlation between poor folate status and increased pemetrexed toxicity in a multivariate analysis led to the requirement of folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation for patients in all pemetrexed studies, with a resulting noted decrease in pemetrexed toxicity. A single, multicenter, randomized Phase III trial compared the efficacy of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in the treatment of MPM. Response rates were 41.3% in the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination and 16.7% with single-agent cisplatin (P < 0.001). The median survival time for the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination was significantly longer at 12.1 months versus 9.3 months for cisplatin alone (P = 0.02). One international, multicenter, randomized Phase III trial in patients with NSCLC compared single-agent pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients previously treated with chemotherapy. Overall response rates (9.1% and 8.8%) and median survival (8.3 months and 7.9 months) did not differ between pemetrexed and docetaxel (P = 0.105 and P = 0.226, respectively). Hematologic adverse effects-grade 3/4 neutropenia (40.2% vs 5.3%; P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% vs 1.9%; P < 0.001), and neutropenic infections (3.3% vs 0%; P = 0.004)-were significantly greater in the docetaxel-treated patients than in the pemetrexed-treated patients, as was alopecia (37.7% vs 6.4%; P < 0.001). Results of an international, multicenter Phase III trial of pemetrexed in combination with gemcitabine conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer indicate that the combination is no more efficacious than single-agent gemcitabine. Results in other disease states are still preliminary.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate that has demonstrated antitumor activity in various tumor types as a single agent and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Efficacy for the treatment of MPM in combination with cisplatin has been demonstrated, and approval as a second-line agent in NSCLC was based on response rate as a surrogate end point for survival. The addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation markedly reduced.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Pemetrexed Combined With Either Cisplatin or Carboplatin in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

Given the activity and tolerability of pemetrexed/platinum combinations in non–small-cell lung cancer, and the success of novel therapeutic strategies employed in recent extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) trials, a randomized phase II trial was initiated to evaluate the use of cisplatin or carboplatin plus pemetrexed in previously untreated ES-SCLC.

Patients and Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or pemetrexed plus carboplatin area under the concentration curve 5. Treatment was administered once every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. All patients received folic acid, vitamin B12, and steroid prophylaxis.

Results

Between December 19, 2002, and May 17, 2004, 78 patients were enrolled onto this multicenter trial. Median age was 63 years (range, 46 to 82 years) for cisplatin/pemetrexed and 66 years (range, 47 to 75 years) for carboplatin/pemetrexed. Median survival time (MST) for cisplatin/pemetrexed was 7.6 months, with a 1-year survivorship of 33.4% and a response rate of 35% (95% CI, 20.6% to 51.7%). The MST for carboplatin/pemetrexed was 10.4 months, with a 1-year survivorship of 39.0% and a response rate of 39.5% (95% CI, 24.0 to 56.6). Median time to progression for cisplatin/pemetrexed was 4.9 months and for carboplatin/pemetrexed was 4.5 months. Median dose-intensity (actual/planned dose) was 98.94% for cisplatin and 99.95% for pemetrexed in the cisplatin/pemetrexed group and 93.21% for carboplatin and 98.50% for pemetrexed in the carboplatin/pemetrexed group. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (15.8% v 20.0%) and thrombocytopenia (13.2% v 22.9%) in the cisplatin/pemetrexed and carboplatin/pemetrexed treatment groups, respectively.

Conclusion

Pemetrexed/platinum doublets had activity and appeared to be well-tolerated in first-line ES-SCLC.

New developments in chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer has changed considerably in the past decade. This paper reviews the most significant changes seen in chemotherapy and the most promising new agents in development for this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Chemotherapy prolongs survival and improves quality of life in patients with a good performance status and appears to alleviate disease-related symptoms in patients with a lower performance status. Platinum-based regimens became standard; none of the third-generation drug combinations seemed to be superior to the others. Nonplatinum combinations are reasonable alternatives now and offer a better toxicity profile in certain populations. Attempts to add molecular-targeted therapy to combination chemotherapy have failed except for bevacizumab. New compounds such as pemetrexed, bortezomib, TLK286, bevacizumab, and the epothilones are currently being evaluated in non-small cell lung cancer.

SUMMARY

Management of non-small cell lung cancer has improved considerably in the past decade. The overall benefit of chemotherapy over supportive care has been shown, platinum-based doublets have been established, nonplatinum regimens have been developed, chemotherapy has been used more broadly in subgroups of patients who have been previously neglected, and a shorter chemotherapy duration has been shown to be equally effective. After hitting a plateau in the benefit of chemotherapy, new drugs with novel action mechanisms such as the ones described here offer hope to improve therapy for this disease.

Anticancer drug clustering in lung cancer based on gene expression profiles and sensitivity database

background

The effect of current therapies in improving the survival of lung cancer patients remains far from satisfactory. It is consequently desirable to find more appropriate therapeutic opportunities based on informed insights. A molecular pharmacological analysis was undertaken to design an improved chemotherapeutic strategy for advanced lung cancer.

Methods

We related the cytotoxic activity of each of commonly used anti-cancer agents (docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, 5-FU, SN38, cisplatin (CDDP), and carboplatin (CBDCA)) to corresponding expression pattern in each of the cell lines using a modified NCI program.

Results

We performed gene expression analysis in lung cancer cell lines using cDNA filter and high-density oligonucleotide arrays. We also examined the sensitivity of these cell lines to these drugs via MTT assay. To obtain our reproducible gene-drug sensitivity correlation data, we separately analyzed two sets of lung cancer cell lines, namely 10 and 19. In our gene-drug correlation analyses, gemcitabine consistently belonged to an isolated cluster in a reproducible fashion. On the other hand, docetaxel, paclitaxel, 5-FU, SN-38, CBDCA and CDDP were gathered together into one large cluster.

Conclusion

These results suggest that chemotherapy regimens including gemcitabine should be evaluated in second-line chemotherapy in cases where the first-line chemotherapy did not include this drug. Gene expression-drug sensitivity correlations, as provided by the NCI program, may yield improved therapeutic options for treatment of specific tumor types.

Second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Despite being considered a standard of care, administration of second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer is limited to patients in good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1) and to selected patients with PS 2. Drugs currently approved by FDA in this setting are docetaxel, gefitinib, erlotinib and pemetrexed, while in Europe those registered with this indication are only docetaxel and pemetrexed. This short review will focus on the role of pemetrexed, from the controlled phase II trial, to the development of the vitamin supplementation strategy to decrease toxicity, to the large phase III registration trial undertaken vs. the standard docetaxel. Moreover, the huge patient material collected during this latter trial has lead to further analyses to clarify several aspects of second-line treatment, from toxicity to quality of life assessment, to its role in elderly patients and to the direct translation in terms of costs. Finally, we will give a brief overview on current trials, that mainly explore the possibility to raise pemetrexed dose, and thus to increase its activity while maintaining an acceptable toxicity.

Second-Line Treatment Options in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status

Despite the emergence of several antineoplastic drugs with activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), real progress with first-line therapy has been limited in the last decade. It has proven difficult to demonstrate important differences between third generation two-drug combinations. In contrast, progress with second-line therapy has been significant, especially in the past few years, with pemetrexed showing equivalent activity to docetaxel but with substantially less toxicity. At the same time, much work has been undertaken investigating the efficacy of the small-molecule epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib in the second-line and subsequent-line settings. Erlotinib has been shown to significantly improve survival versus placebo following failure on one or two prior regimens, especially in select or targeted patient populations. Finding the optimal place and patients for these agents in NSCLC treatment will be one of the more fascinating challenges of the next few years.

Second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, most will resist or relapse after first-line chemotherapy. As a result, second-line therapy has been a major focus for clinical research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was carried out from 1996 to February 2005.

RESULTS

Second-line chemotherapy provides pre-treated NSCLC patients with a clear survival advantage. Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is the present standard second-line chemotherapy. Despite promising results regarding efficacy and toxicity in phase III studies, a docetaxel weekly schedule could not be recommended. Pemetrexed recently emerged as an alternative with similar efficacy and less toxicity. Although the combination of two drugs was not associated with a survival benefit when compared with single-agent chemotherapy, such regimens induced a dramatic increase in toxicities and therefore mono-chemotherapy remains the standard as second-line therapy. Finally, few new agents were reported with better results than those used previously and clinical research on second-line therapy currently focuses on combinations with targeted therapies.

CONCLUSION

Second-line chemotherapy offers NSCLC patients a small but significant survival improvement. However, this field of clinical research needs further investigations in order to answer certain remaining questions especially concerning targeted therapies.

Second-Line Treatment Options in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparison of Cytotoxic Agents and Targeted Therapies

Current options for the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include cytotoxic drugs, such as docetaxel and pemetrexed, and targeted therapies. Docetaxel was approved in the United States and Europe in 2000 after two phase III trials showed drug superiority versus best supportive care alone and versus alternative single-agent chemotherapy. Pemetrexed was approved in the United States and Europe in 2004 after a phase III trial showed that, compared with docetaxel, it had comparable activity (median survival time of approximately 8 months in both arms) and a more favorable toxicity profile: grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 5.3% versus 40.2% of patients in the pemetrexed and docetaxel arms, respectively, while febrile neutropenia was observed in 1.9% versus 12.7% of patients, respectively. In the United States, gefitinib and erlotinib have also been approved for the treatment of recurrent NSCLC (in 2003 and 2004, respectively), while in Europe the registration of these agents is currently under evaluation. This review focuses on the use of docetaxel and pemetrexed for the second-line treatment of NSCLC and compares these drugs with targeted therapies, highlighting the latest developments in pharmacogenomics that might lead to a more tailored approach to treatment.

The safety and efficacy of second-line single docetaxel (75 mg/m²) therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

When used in the second-line setting, single-agent chemotherapy has produced response rates of more than 10% or median survival times greater than 4 months. We studied the safety and efficacy of using second-line single docetaxel (75 mg/m²) for advanced NSCLC patients who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients with advanced NSCLC received chemotherapy from May 2002 to January 2005. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of these patients. The patients received 75 mg/m² of doxetaxel on day 1 and this was repeated at 3-week intervals.

RESULTS

The median age was 63 years (range: 42~77 years); 16 patients had adenocarcinoma and 8 patients had squamous cell carcinoma. The median number of cycles was 4 (range: 1~7 cycles). Of the 33 patients, 6 patients had partial responses, 13 patients had stable disease and 14 patients had progressive disease. The response rate was 18.2%. The median overall survival was 11 months (range: 7~15 months), and the median progression free survival was 5 months (range: 3~7 months). The median response duration was 5 months (range: 4~9 months). A total of 137 cycles were evaluated for toxicity. We observed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 79 cycles (57.6%), grade 3 or 4 leukopenia in 46 cycles (33.6%), and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 2 cycles (1.5%). The median nadir day was day 9 (range: day 5~19), and the median number of G-CSF injections was 2 (range: 0~6). The most common non-hematologic toxicities were myalgia/arthralgia and neurotoxicity, but any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was not observed. The major toxicity of this therapy was neutropenia. The absolute neutrophil count decreased relatively rapidly, but neutropenic fever or related infection was rare. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

These results revealed a satisfactory response rate (18.2%) with using docetaxel as the second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC. The second-line docetaxel was an active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

An evaluation of pemetrexed in second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed is a novel antifolate antimetabolite that targets multiple folate-dependent enzymatic pathways and inhibits multiple enzymes involved in purine and pyrimidine synthesis. Its targets include pathways that, when amplified, are associated with reduced efficacy in conventional cytotoxic agents. As second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, (NSCLC) pemetrexed, when administered with folic acid and vitamin B12, has demonstrated comparable efficacy and a superior toxicity profile relative to docetaxel. A retrospective analysis of the Phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel shows a statistically significant longer toxicity-free survival time for pemetrexed compared with docetaxel. Newer targeted therapies, especially the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib, have produced conflicting results and have only been compared with best supportive care and placebo. They should be compared directly to pemetrexed as second-line therapy in large, randomised studies of patients with advanced NSCLC. For patients with advanced recurrent NSCLC and good performance status who progress after first-line chemotherapy, pemetrexed should be considered as a new standard of care.

New cytotoxic agents: a review of the literature

The goal of treatment for patients with advanced cancer is to prolong survival, control symptoms, and reduce disease-related complications. Despite the introduction of many cytotoxic agents during the past decade, only modest improvement in survival has been achieved. In order to urgently improve these situations, new cytotoxic agents as well as molecular-targeted agents are now under investigation. In this article, we reviewed the latest information regarding antitumor activity, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and clinical application of the new cytotoxic agents.

The evolving role of pemetrexed (Alimta) in lung cancer

Pemetrexed (Alimta; Eli Lilly and Co, Indianapolis, IN) is a multitargeted antifolate that inhibits several folate-dependent enzymes that play roles in purine and pyrimidine synthesis. The principal toxicities of pemetrexed are neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, mucositis, and skin rash. These toxicities are more frequent in vitamin-deficient (folate and vitamin B 12 ) patients, and can be ameliorated by the co-administration of folate and vitamin B 12 . The use of prophylactic dexamethasone is also recommended to reduce the frequency of severe skin rash. Pemetrexed has significant single-agent activity in previously treated and untreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A recent phase III trial comparing pemetrexed with docetaxel in previously treated NSCLC patients showed equivalent efficacy with less bone marrow toxicity (eg, neutropenia) in the pemetrexed group. These results were pivotal in the approval of pemetrexed for the treatment of refractory NSCLC. Pemetrexed has been combined with the platinums (ie, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin) in NSCLC to yield clinical activity similar to that of other platinum-based doublets. A comparative phase III trial of cisplatin/pemetrexed against cisplatin/gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly and Co) is under way. Pemetrexed has also been evaluated in combination with gemcitabine, and although the optimal dose and schedule of this combination has not been defined, clinical activity similar to other nonplatinum-based doublets has been observed. Preliminary evidence suggests that pemetrexed can be combined with thoracic radiation therapy, but more data are needed to evaluate the potential advantage(s) pemetrexed may have in this setting. Pemetrexed/platinum doublets also appear to possess activity in extensive stage small cell lung cancer. A phase II trial of single-agent pemetrexed is under way in both sensitive- and refractory-relapsed small cell lung cancer. Given the activity and excellent tolerability of pemetrexed, further studies in lung cancer are warranted.

Pemetrexed (Alimta) in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) comprises approximately 13% of all lung cancers. In limited stage (LS)-SCLC, combined-modality therapy represents the standard of care. Therapy should be approached curatively in fit patients with a good performance status because 5-year survival rates approach 26% in aggressively treated patients. In contrast, cure is not possible in extensive stage (ES)-SCLC with median 2-year survival rates with current therapy remaining at less than 10%. Pemetrexed (Alimta; Eli Lilly and Co, Indianapolis, IN) is a novel, multi-targeted antifolate that inhibits several folate-dependent enzymes involved in purine and pyrimidine synthesis, and is active as a single-agent or in combination with a platinum in both non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Pemetrexed/platinum combinations appear active in ES-SCLC based on objective response rates observed in a randomized phase II trial. However, no survival data is yet available from this trial. The toxicity profile of both cisplatin and carboplatin in combination with pemetrexed was extremely favorable, as was the ability to deliver full doses of each of the component drugs. Given the limited options available for patients in the relapsed setting, the activity of single-agent pemetrexed is interesting. Also, preliminary data indicates that full doses of carboplatin/pemetrexed can be administered with thoracic radiation therapy, supporting a future clinical trial initiative in LS-SCLC.

Three Emerging New Drugs for NSCLC: Pemetrexed, Bortezomib, and Cetuximab

Despite advances made in cytotoxic chemotherapy, the prognosis for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to be poor. New, more effective drugs must be identified and developed to improve the outcome of these patients. Three drugs with promising activity in NSCLC are pemetrexed (Alimta; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, http://www.lilly.com), bortezomib (Velcade; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, http://www.mlnm.com), and cetuximab (Erbitux; ImClone Systems, Inc., New York, NY, http://www.imclone.com). Pemetrexed inhibits thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase, enzymes necessary for purine and pyrimidine synthesis, thus causing cell-cycle arrest in the S phase. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, interferes with the cytosolic protein degradation machinery, namely the ubiquitin-proteasome complex, causing breakdown of cell-cycle regulators and cell-cycle arrest. Cetuximab is a chimeric mouse-human antibody that inhibits ligand-dependent activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor, resulting in receptor internalization and inhibition of downstream pathways that, in turn, causes cell growth and progression. All three drugs are approved for different tumor types, and studies defining their role in NSCLC are under way.

Antimetabolites in the management of non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Although chemotherapy has been shown to increase survival for patients with advanced-stage disease, survival benefits have been modest and come at the cost of significant toxicity. Treatment options in the second-line setting have been limited. Pemetrexed, a multitargeted antifolate, has activity as a single agent and as part of combination chemotherapy against NSCLC. As reported in a recent phase III clinical trial, survival outcomes in the second-line setting for patients treated with pemetrexed or docetaxel are similar. More importantly, major toxicity with the use of pemetrexed with vitamin B(12) and folate supplementation is far less than with docetaxel. Based on its single agent activity, ease of administration, and favorable toxicity profile, pemetrexed has the potential to be incorporated in various settings against NSCLC, including metastatic disease, as adjuvant therapy, and for locally advanced disease.

The biology of non-small-cell lung cancer: identifying new targets for rational therapy

Lung cancer, and in particular non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), remains the leading cause of cancer death throughout the world. Almost three decades ago, the major concern was to identify whether cisplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy enhanced survival in metastatic NSCLC, and whether any survival benefit compensated for cisplatin-related toxicity. Over the last 10 years, significant advances have been achieved in molecular biology, including the identification of critical genes related to the pathogenesis of NSCLC, which have formed the basis for new targeted therapeutic approaches. These new approaches include novel agents against established chemotherapeutic targets such as thymidylate synthetase as well as agents that inhibit novel targets such as growth factor receptors and proteins important in angiogenesis. With the advent of genomic technologies that can identify patterns of gene expression, the hope is that therapy will be tailored to the genetic pattern of the patients's tumor, and individualized treatments that minimize toxicity and maximize efficacy can be developed.

Therapeutic Advances in Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

A majority of patients with lung cancer present with advanced disease: approximately 30% with locally advanced disease and 45% with metastatic disease. The prognosis for these patients is poor, with 5-year survival rates ranging from 5% to 15% for stage IIIB disease and < 5% for stage IV disease. For patients confronting advanced disease, chemotherapy is an essential option for disease control and palliation. Although a number of effective first-line regimens exist, virtually all patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will have disease relapse. For these patients, identifying the optimal treatment course remains a challenge. This article reviews approved and investigational second-line therapeutic options in patients with relapsed advanced NSCLC. Recently, docetaxel has been shown to improve survival in patients with advanced NSCLC who had progressive disease following treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Subsequently, permetrexed was compared with docetaxel in a second-line treatment study that showed survival for both patient groups was virtually identical. Recently, erlotinib was associated with significantly longer survival compared with best supportive care in the second- or third-line treatment settings. Salvage treatment for NSCLC is reviewed, and the relative merits of the currently available treatments as well as agents that are pending Food and Drug Administration approval as second-line treatments are discussed.

Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have failed previous treatments

OBJECTIVE

New effective therapy is desirable for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have failed previous treatments. Fractionated administration of paclitaxel may be less toxic and more active against NSCLC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel therapy for NSCLC in a second-line setting.

METHODS

Patients with pathological or cytological diagnosis of NSCLC, measurable lesions, and one or more prior therapies were enrolled. We administered weekly infusions of 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel 3 times in a 4-week cycle. In the absence of progressive disease or intolerable toxicity, each patient was treated for a minimum of 4 cycles.

RESULTS

Of 39 patients enrolled, 1 patient achieved complete response and 11 patients achieved partial response (response rate, 31%: 95% confidence interval, 17-48%). The median survival time was 43 weeks (range, 7-128 weeks). Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia occurred in only 7 patients (18%). Neurotoxicity was the most frequent adverse effect (grades 1 and 2.26 and 5%, respectively). Although all patients recovered rapidly with corticosteroid treatment, drug-induced pneumonitis was observed in 3 patients (8%).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose weekly paclitaxel is a promising therapy with high effectiveness for advanced NSCLC in patients with NSCLC who have failed previous treatments.

Second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: recent data with pemetrexed

Platinum-based chemotherapy offers a modest survival advantage over best supportive care (BSC) in chemotherapy-naive patients with a good performance status and advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Based on 2 landmark studies that reported improved survival times and quality of life when comparing docetaxel with ifosfamide, vinorelbine, or BSC alone, docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2) given once every 3 weeks has been the standard of care as second-line chemotherapy since 2000. Docetaxel given at this dose and schedule resulted in significant hematologic toxicity, with many patients at risk for neutropenic fever. Pemetrexed is a novel multitargeted antifolate agent with single-agent activity in first- and second-line treatment of NSCLC. A phase III study in 571 patients comparing pemetrexed with docetaxel demonstrated clinically equivalent therapeutic outcomes in second-line treatment of patients with recurrent NSCLC; however, patients on the pemetrexed arm had a more favorable hematologic toxicity profile, with fewer episodes of neutropenia, neutropenic fever, and infections and less use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Based on these data, pemetrexed is a reasonable second-line chemotherapy option for patients with recurrent, advanced NSCLC.

Pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a review of the clinical data

Pemetrexed is a novel multitargeting antimetabolite that has first-line and second-line activity against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase II studies have shown significant efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile of the combination of pemetrexed plus platinum as first-line therapy for NSCLC. Second-line activity against NSCLC was demonstrated in a phase III trial comparing single-agent pemetrexed with docetaxel; in that trial, survival was comparable between these agents but side effects were significantly less for patients who received pemetrexed. Pemetrexed is also an active agent against mesothelioma. A phase III trial comparing pemetrexed plus cisplatin with cisplatin alone showed for the first time a regimen that improves survival in this disease and led to FDA approval of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin for mesothelioma. As a radiosensitizer, pemetrexed has been well-tolerated when given concurrent with chest radiation, and a phase I study is under way assessing its tolerability in combination with carboplatin in this setting. Pemetrexed is clearly a useful agent in the treatment of thoracic malignancies, and is worthy of further study in combination with other drugs having novel mechanisms of action.

Phase II Study of Pemetrexed-Gemcitabine Combination in Patients with Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Cisplatin is one of the most active agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is also known for significant toxicity, which makes it unsuitable for certain patients. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a promising cisplatin-free combination, gemcitabine plus pemetrexed, in NSCLC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Chemo-naive patients with inoperable NSCLC were eligible for this study. Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) was given intravenously on days 1 and 8, followed by intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) on day 8. After inclusion of 13 patients, folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation was added to lower pemetrexed-induced toxicity. Quality of life was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale.

RESULTS

Sixty patients enrolled; 58 were evaluable for response. All patients had a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. Eighty-seven percent had stage IV disease. Nine patients had a confirmed partial response [overall response rate, 15.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.3-27.4%]. Twenty-nine (50.0%) patients had stable disease. Median overall survival was 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.0 months), with a 1- and 2-year overall survival of 42.6% (95% CI, 30.0-55.3%) and 18.5% (95% CI, 7.9-29.1%). Median progression-free survival was 5.0 months. Median response duration was 3.3 months. There were no deaths attributed to treatment. Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (61.7%), febrile neutropenia (16.7%), fatigue (23.3%), and elevations of aspartate aminotransferase (15.0%) and alanine aminotransferase (20.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

This combination had good tolerance and achieved promising overall survival with extended 1- and 2-year survival rates. This cisplatin-free regimen warrants further evaluation in randomized trials.

Abarelix Pemetrexed

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column focuses on the commercially available and investigational agents used to treat malignant diseases and reviews issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy.

Targeting non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: where do we stand, where do we go

Cytotoxic chemotherapy has only yielded modest gains in survival in lung cancer in the past decade. However, the development of agents targeting specific signaling pathways that drive carcinogenesis has heralded a major paradigm shift in the approach to treatment of cancer. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many researchers have focused on the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) because this protein is present on a relatively high proportion of non-small cell lung cancers and its intracellular tyrosine kinase activates a signaling cascade that drives tumor growth. Blockade of the EGFR by small molecule inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase, such as gefitinib and erlotinib, causes tumor regressions in NSCLC. Phase II monotherapy trials of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC demonstrated anti-tumor activity with objective response rates of 10-19% with acceptable toxicities and an associated improvement in lung cancer symptomatology. Gefitinib is now an FDA approved treatment for advanced NSCLC previously treated with platinum and docetaxel-based therapies. However, phase III trials of gefitinib and erlotinib in combination with chemotherapy doublets have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage when compared with chemotherapy alone. It remains unclear why these drugs work so effectively in certain patients and so poorly in combination with chemotherapy. The goal of ongoing and future investigation is to identify which patients may benefit from this new therapeutic approach.

Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had a performance status 0 to 2, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, and adequate organ function. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) day 1 with vitamin B(12), folic acid, and dexamethasone or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1 with dexamethasone every 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventy-one patients were randomly assigned. Overall response rates were 9.1% and 8.8% (analysis of variance P =.105) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months (P = not significant) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. The 1-year survival rate for each arm was 29.7%. Patients receiving docetaxel were more likely to have grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40.2% v 5.3%; P <.001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% v 1.9%; P <.001), neutropenia with infections (3.3% v 0.0%; P =.004), hospitalizations for neutropenic fever (13.4% v 1.5%; P <.001), hospitalizations due to other drug related adverse events (10.5% v 6.4%; P =.092), use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (19.2% v 2.6%, P <.001) and all grade alopecia (37.7% v 6.4%; P <.001) compared with patients receiving pemetrexed.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes, but with significantly fewer side effects compared with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and should be considered a standard treatment option for second-line NSCLC when available.

Pemetrexed for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The novel antifolate pemetrexed targets multiple enzymes involved in folate metabolism, resulting in inhibition of DNA synthesis. Pemetrexed has shown antitumor activity in preclinical models against a variety of tumor types, including non-small cell lung cancer. Phase II studies have confirmed its single-agent activity and manageable toxicity profile, and pemetrexed has shown antitumor activity in combination with other chemotherapeutics, including gemcitabine, taxanes, platinums, and vinorelbine, in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A large ongoing phase III trial is comparing the activity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in the second-line setting. Supplementation with oral folic acid and vitamin B12 was shown to reduce pemetrexed-related toxicity and increase its therapeutic index. These data suggest that pemetrexed has significant activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer and represents a new treatment option for patients with this disease.

The role of Pemetrexed (Alimta , LY231514) in lung cancer therapy

Pemetrexed (Alimta , LY231514) is a new multitargeted antifolate that inhibits several enzymes involved in the folate pathway. Pemetrexed is a potent inhibitor of thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. Pemetrexed has demonstrated clinical activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as in a broad array of other solid tumors including mesothelioma and breast, colorectal, bladder, cervical, gastric, and pancreatic cancer. In NSCLC, single-agent activity has been documented in the first- and second-line settings. Promising activity has also been demonstrated when pemetrexed is combined with cisplatin, vinorelbine, oxaliplatin, carboplatin, and gemcitabine. Low-level dietary supplement of folic acid and vitamin B12 has significantly improved the safety profile of pemetrexed without compromising its antitumor effect. In this review, the pharmacology and clinical activity of pemetrexed in NSCLC cancer is discussed.

Second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Several agents have been evaluated for the second-line treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The TAX 317 trial found that patients treated with docetaxel (Taxotere) 75 mg/m2 had significantly longer survival than those treated with best supportive care alone. In addition, symptom control was better for patients who received chemotherapy. The TAX 320 trial found that treatment with docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m2 resulted in significantly higher response rates than treatment with vinorelbine (Navelbine) or ifosfamide (Mitoxana), and the 1-year survival rate was also significantly better for patients treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2. A large randomized trial compared pemetrexed (LY-231514 or Alimta) 500 mg/m2 with docetaxel 75 mg/m2. Response and survival rates were similar in the two treatment arms, however, the toxicity profile of pemetrexed was superior to that of docetaxel with significantly less Grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Fewer patients in the pemetrexed arm required hospitalization. Topotecan (Hycamtin) 2.3 mg/m2/day orally for 5 days has been compared with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 in a large 800-patient study. The results of this trial are awaited. Gemcitabine (Gemzar) and irinotecan (Campto) have been evaluated both as single agents and in combination with each other and study results do not suggest that either of these drugs is superior to docetaxel or pemetrexed. The vinca alkaloid vinorelbine has proved to be inferior to docetaxel in a randomized trial. The epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa) and erlotinib (CP-358774, OSI 774, Tarceva) have been evaluated in Phase II trials in the second- and third-line setting. Both drugs have demonstrated interesting response rates ranging from 10 to almost 20%. The results of placebo-controlled randomized trials of this family of drugs are awaited. In summary, several studies have now found a definite role for the second-line treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.