Prediction of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients by use of prognostic indicators

Prognostic and predictive indicators in operable breast cancer

Because of its biological heterogeneity and wide spectrum of responsiveness to different treatments, breast cancer is a complex disease of difficult clinical management. Over the past several years, knowledge of the molecular mechanisms regulating normal and aberrant cell growth leading to cancer has been enhanced. These advances have enabled the identification of an increasing number of surrogate biomarkers, which have been correlated with prognosis or used as predictors of response to specific treatments. Axillary nodal status, age, tumor size, pathologic grade, and hormone receptor status are the established prognostic and/or predictive factors for selection of adjuvant treatments. The role of new biomarkers, such as p53, HER2/neu, angiogenesis, and the proliferation index value, is promising; however, the clinical value of their determination must be provided by prospective clinical studies.

Sequelae of axillary lymph node dissection in older women with stage 1 and 2 breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There are few data on the long-term sequelae of axillary dissection among older breast carcinoma patients. We describe the impact of axillary dissection in a cohort of older women.

METHODS

A longitudinal cohort of 571 patients with Stage 1 and 2 breast carcinoma, 67 years and older, diagnosed between 1995 and 1997 from 29 hospitals in five regions, and followed for 2 years. Data were collected from patients and medical charts. The primary outcome was posttreatment quality of life. Generalized estimation equation longitudinal modeling was used to evaluate the outcome, controlling for baseline function, comorbidity, age, clinical status, and other factors.

RESULTS

Sixty percent of women reported arm problems at some time in the 2 years after surgery. The cumulative risk of having arm problems 2 years posttreatment was three times higher (95% confidence interval 1.94-4.67) for women who underwent axillary surgery compared with women without axillary surgery, controlling for covariates. The effects of having axillary dissection and arthritis were multiplicative 2 years postsurgery. Arm problems were, in turn, the primary determinate of lower physical and mental functioning (P = 0.0001 and 0.04, respectively), controlling for other factors. Undergoing axillary dissection did not lessen fears about recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Arm problems after axillary dissection have a consistent negative impact on quality of life, suggesting that the risks may outweigh the potential benefits in this population.

Will we need lymph node dissection at all in the future?

Traditionally in the treatment of primary breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) plays an important role. However, a substantial and increasing percentage of patients appear to have no nodal involvement and have been subjected to ALND unnecessarily. The first reason to perform an ALND is axillary nodal staging. After reviewing the literature, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients an adequately conducted lymphatic mapping by sentinel node procedure is equal to ALND for this purpose. The second reason to perform an ALND is to establish the extent of nodal involvement, which might have an impact on adjuvant treatment recommendations. However, there is no evidence available that patients with extensive nodal involvement (= 4 positive nodes) benefit more from adjuvant systemic treatment (either standard or high dose) in terms of reduction of odds of recurrence and mortality compared to patients with limited nodal involvement and optimally administered so-called standard adjuvant treatment. The third reason to perform an ALND is to ensure axillary tumor control. Reviewing the different treatment options, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients axillary control after axillary radiotherapy appears to be similar to axillary control after ALND. In clinically overt axillary involvement, ALND (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) may result in an improved regional control. In the near future, ALND will not be the standard of care but will be reserved for those patients with proven axillary lymph node involvement. In microscopic disease, radiotherapy may be an alternative with equal control and less morbidity.

The potential therapeutic effect of sentinel lymphadenectomy

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in a minimally invasive staging procedure for early breast cancer patients that is currently being investigated in many institutional and multi-institutional studies. Its main perspectives are the omission of axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node-negative patients and an improved staging as a result of more intensive histopathological methods for the detection of nodal involvement. The hypothesis presented in this article suggests that sentinel lymphadenectomy may also serve as a therapeutic intervention in some patients. The background for this comes from historical studies before the general use of systemic adjuvant treatment, which suggest that some node-positive breast cancer patients seem to be curable by locoregional treatment alone. Recent studies show that many patients have nodal metastases limited to the SLNs, where (considering the sigmoid growth model of solid tumours) small metastases may grow faster than larger ones. Large metastases are associated with worse prognosis. It is suggested that, in consequence of its expected therapeutic effects, sentinel lymphadenectomy, i.e. the removal of the lymph nodes most likely to harbour metastases, should be preferred to the omission of axillary dissection, or any other surgical staging procedure based on predictive models of nodal involvement derived from primary tumour characteristics.

T1 breast cancer: identification of patients at low risk of axillary lymph node metastases

OBJECTIVE

The status of the axillary lymph nodes is one of the most important prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer. A panel of molecular markers of tumor aggressiveness in addition to conventional clinical and histopathologic features were analyzed in an attempt to identify a subgroup of patients with a low risk of axillary lymph node metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from 358 patients with T1 breast cancer who underwent level I/II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were investigated. Hormone receptor status, Ki-67, S-phase fraction, DNA ploidy, HER-2/neu, p53, epidermal growth factor receptor, urokinase type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, bone marrow micrometastases as well as patient age, menopausal status, tumor site, tumor size, histologic type, tumor grade, carcinoma in situ, multifocality, and lymph vascular invasion (LVI) were studied to predict axillary lymph node status.

RESULTS

In a multivariate logistic regression analysis LVI (present v.s. not present), Ki-67 (> or = 18% v.s. < 18%), tumor size (1.1-2 cm v.s. < or = 1 cm), and histologic grade (G3 v.s. G1/2) were identified as independent predictive factors of axillary lymph node metastases. Approximately 13% of patients (n = 47) with well or moderately differentiated tumors less than or equal to 1 cm, no lymph vascular invasion, and a low Ki-67 staining were identified as having a low risk of axillary lymph node metastases of 4.3%. However, 20 patients with all four unfavorable predictive factors had a 75% incidence of axillary lymph node involvement.

CONCLUSION

Primary tumor characteristics can be used to identify a subgroup of patients with a low risk of axillary lymph node metastases in T1 breast cancer. Preoperative risk assessment might be used to omit routine ALND in those patients at low risk of axillary lymph node metastases.

A prospective validated model for predicting axillary node metastases based on 2,000 sentinel node procedures: the role of tumour location [corrected]

AIMS

The purpose was to identify the independent predictive factors of axillary lymph-node metastases (ALNM) in infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IFDC) and to create a prospective, validated statistical model to predict the likelihood of ALNM in patients in the present era of sentinel lymph-node (SLN) biopsy and enhanced histopathology.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate analyses of 13 clinicopathological variables (including tumour location) were performed to determine predictors of ALNM in 1659 eligible SLN biopsy procedures. A logistic regression model was developed and then prospectively validated on a second population of 187 subsequent consecutive procedures.

RESULTS

Age, pathological tumour size, palpability, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histological grade, nuclear grade, ductal histological subtype, tumour location (quadrant) and multifocality were associated with ALNM in univariate analyses (P < 0.001). Of these, only palpability and histological grade were not statistically associated with ALNM in the multivariate analysis (P> 0.05). The frequency of ALNM in upper-inner-quadrant (UIQ) tumours was 20.6%, compared with 33.2% for all other quadrants (P<0.0005). There was no statistical difference between UIQ and other-quadrant tumours in any clinicopathological variables analysed. The logistic regression model, developed based on the population of 1659, had the same accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value when applied prospectively to the second population.

CONCLUSION

Tumour size, LVI, age, nuclear grade, histological subtype, multifocality and location in the breast were independent predictive factors for ALNM in IFDC. ALNM is less frequent in UIQ tumours than in other-quadrant tumours. Our prospectively validated predictive model could be valuable in pre-operative patient discussions, although staging of the axilla in the individual patient remains necessary.

Pathologic tumor size and lymph node status predict for different rates of locoregional recurrence after mastectomy for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the pathologic factors associated with postmastectomy locoregional recurrence (LRR) in breast cancer patients not receiving radiation who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NEO) vs. adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed the rates of LRR of subsets of women treated in prospective trials who underwent mastectomy and received chemotherapy but not radiation. These trials were designed to answer chemotherapy questions. There were 150 patients in the NEO group and 1031 patients in the ADJ group. In the NEO group, 55% had clinical Stage IIIA or higher vs. 9% in the ADJ group (p <0.001, chi-square test).

RESULTS

Despite the more advanced clinical stage in the NEO group, the pathologic size of the primary tumor and the number of positive lymph nodes (+LNs) were significantly less in the NEO group than in the ADJ group (p <0.001 for both comparisons). However, the 5-year actuarial LRR rate was 27% for the NEO group vs. 15% for the ADJ group (p = 0.001, log-rank). The 5-year risk for LRR was higher in the NEO patients for all pathologic tumor sizes: 0-2 cm (18% vs. 8%, p = 0.011), 2.1-5 cm (36% vs. 15%, p <0.001), and >5 cm (46% vs. 28%, p = 0.028). The risk of LRR by the number of +LNs was similar in the NEO and ADJ groups, except for the subset of patients with > or =4 +LNs (53% vs. 23%, p <0.001). The rates of LRR in the patients with primary tumors measuring < or =2.0 cm and 1-3 +LNs were similar in both groups. However, for the patients with a pathologic tumor size of 2.1-5.0 cm and 1-3 +LNs, the LRR was higher in the NEO group than in the ADJ group (30% vs. 15%, p = 0.016). Most failures in this NEO subgroup had clinical Stage III disease. In a subset of NEO and ADJ patients matched for clinical stage, no significant differences were found in the rates of LRR according to primary tumor size and number of +LNs when these variables were analyzed independently. Again, however, differences were found in the subgroup of patients with tumors pathologically measuring 2.1-5.0 cm with 1-3 +LNs (32% NEO vs. 8% ADJ, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

The rates of postmastectomy LRR for any pathologic tumor size are higher for patients treated with initial chemotherapy than for patients treated with initial surgery. Radiotherapy should be offered to all patients with > or =4 +LNs, tumor size >5 cm, or clinical Stage IIIA or greater disease, regardless of whether they receive neoadjuvant or postoperative chemotherapy. The information assessing LRR rates in patients with clinical Stage II disease who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, particularly if 1-3 lymph nodes remain pathologically involved, is insufficient to determine whether these patients should receive radiotherapy.

Patient and provider characteristics that affect the use of axillary dissection in older women with stage I-II breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Axillary dissection for the evaluation and treatment of patients with breast carcinoma often is not performed in older women. The objective of this study was to examine patient, clinical, and surgeon characteristics associated with the use of axillary dissection after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

METHODS

A cohort of 464 women age > or = 67 years who were newly diagnosed with Stage I-II breast carcinoma and who underwent BCS were surveyed along with their 158 surgeons, and their medical records were reviewed. Patient, tumor, and provider characteristics were examined for association with the omission of axillary dissection.

RESULTS

The majority of women (63.4%) underwent axillary lymph node dissection after BCS. Increasing age was associated strongly with decreasing odds of undergoing axillary lymph node dissection, even after considering patient health and preferences, clinical factors, and provider factors (odds ratio [OR], 0.11; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.05-0.27). Independent of age and other factors, women in the lowest quartile of physical functioning were 37% less likely to undergo axillary lymph node dissection compared with women in the highest quartile (OR, 0.63; 95%CI, 0.62-0.64). Patients who were cared for by surgeons with subspecialty training in oncology were 60% less likely to undergo axillary lymph node dissection compared with patients who were cared for by other surgeons, even after considering other factors (OR, 0.41; 95%CI, 0.25-0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated a correlation between lower use of axillary dissection and advancing age, lower functional status, and greater surgeon training. These findings suggest that simple, age-based considerations are important but are not the sole determinants of variations in treatment.

Predictive model of axillary lymph node involvement in women with small invasive breast carcinoma: axillary metastases in breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node involvement (ALNI) remains the most accurate predictive factor for recurrence risk and survival in patients with invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) and is an essential element in therapeutic decisions. However, axillary dissection (AD) is responsible for several side effects and is now discussed in small IBC. The objective of this study was to define a predictive model of ALNI by using clinical and histologic variables available before surgery.

METHODS

The authors studied 795 cases of IBC (T0, T1, T2 < or = 4 cm; N0; M0) treated between 1980 and 1997 by conservative surgery and radiation therapy. All cases had axillary dissection with at least 10 lymph nodes removed. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to build a predictive model of ALNI. The authors then used the jackknife resampling technique to produce unbiased estimates of the probabilities of ALNI along with their confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The global ALNI rate was 25.7%. The final predictive model included clinical tumor size, location, and histologic subtype and grade as variables independently associated with ALNI. The estimated probability of ALNI varied from 6% to 45%, according to case characteristics for these variables.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that the omission of AD in surgical procedures for these tumors is debatable. Even when ALNI rates were low, the superior bounds of the confidence intervals could be high. Consequently, we do not recommend to omit AD in women whose estimated risks are higher than 25%. Women with a risk of ALNI lower than 25% could benefit from the sentinel lymph node procedure with, likewise, a limited risk of false-negative.

A treatment scale for axillary management in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

We have investigated a method, the Kaufman axillary treatment scale (KATS), to help assign patients with a clinically negative axilla to one of three current options of axillary management: standard axillary dissection, sentinel node sampling followed by axillary dissection if the sentinel node is positive, or no axillary surgery at all. The KATS score uses preoperative data to guide the choice of axillary treatment.

METHODS

The KATS score is calculated by adding the preoperative values of tumor size, patient age, and pathologic grade. Values range from 1 to 4 for size (1 to 9 mm, 10 to 14 mm, 15 to 19 mm, and 20 to 30 mm), 1 to 3 for age (70 years and over, 50 to 69 years, less than 50 years), and 1 to 2 for grade (low or not low) to calculate the score. The KATS score ranges from 3 to 9. We have applied this score against the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) tumor registry of 529 patients with invasive breast cancer with known pathologic data. We then validated it by applying it to our own set of 190 patients using preoperative data. The chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used for P values (all two sided), univariate and multivariate analysis, odds ratio and confidence intervals utilizing SPSS statistics software.

RESULTS

In the SEER database using American Joint Committee on Cancer pathologic size alone, no sizable group was identified with a positive node rate neither below 8% (T1a) nor above 48% (T2). KATS scores of 3 and 4 (68 patients, group 1) identify patients with an average node positive rate of 4.4% (P <0.02, group 1 versus 2). Those patients with KATS scores of 5, 6, and 7 (341 patients, group 2) carry an average node positive rate of 22% (P <0.001, group 2 versus 3). KATS scores of 8 and 9 (120 patients, group 3) identify patients with an average node positive rate of 50% (P <0.001, group 3 versus 1). Similar results were found on our own group of 190 patients using preoperative available data. KATS scores of 3 or 4 (11 patients, group 1) had no positive nodes. Group 2 (100 patients, KATS score 5, 6, and 7) had an average 30% node positive rate. Group 3 (79 patients, KATS score 8 and 9) had 61% node positive rate. The KATS score allows the clinician to separate patients into three axillary management groups. Group 1 are those patients who may need no axillary surgery at all. Group 2 are patients who would benefit from sentinel node mapping. Group 3 has a node positive rate (61%) similar to that of clinically palpable nodes (since not all clinically palpable nodes are positive). Group 3 patients may be considered for standard axillary dissection, similar to the palpable node patient. If group 3 patients have sentinel node mapping, more than half of these patients require axillary dissection and the impact of false negative sentinel node procedures may become clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

An axillary treatment score has been developed to aid in the triage of patients toward reasonable axillary treatment choices for the benefit of the patient. The KATS score is a guideline and not a mandate. The KATS score attempts to use breakpoints that are both clinically practical and validated by scientific data. Like many other attempts to categorize patients, there is a continuum of data points along any variable. The treating physician utilizing the full array of available data on each patient makes the final clinical decision of axillary management.

Microsatellite alterations detected in the serum of early stage breast cancer patients

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting women. Advances in screening have resulted in an increasing trend towards detecting earlier stage tumors associated with a longer disease-free survival. Because of this prolonged latency period, it is critical to identify patients early in their disease course who are at increased risk for recurrence, whereby treatment decisions may be altered accordingly based on more precise information. Molecular markers that demonstrate prognostic importance as well as utility for assessing subclinical disease progression offer one such approach. Specifically, circulating microsatellite alterations that reflect those genetic events occurring in tumors and that can be serially assessed through a minimally invasive procedure are a logistically practical method. In this study, serum was collected preoperatively from 56 patients with early stage breast cancer (AJCC stages I/II) and assessed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) using 8 microsatellite markers. Twelve (21%) of 56 patients demonstrated LOH in their serum for at least one marker. Histopathologic correlation revealed an association between the presence of circulating LOH in serum and those tumors with increased proliferation indices as characterized by an increased diploid index, elevated MIB-1 fraction, and abnormal ploidy. These findings demonstrate the presence of circulating microsatellite alterations in the serum from patients with early stage breast cancer. The association of known poor prognostic features found in tumors with increased nuclear activity not only suggests a possible etiology for their presence, but also offers a potential blood-based surrogate marker for this disease that may demonstrate clinical utility in long-term follow-up studies.

Assessment of axillary lymph node involvement in small breast cancer: analysis of 893 cases

Axillary nodal involvement (ANI) remains an essential prognostic factor for breast cancer patients, as it implies the necessity of systemic adjuvant treatment and locoregional irradiation. Axillary dissection (AD) contributes to improved local disease control and may increase survival. However, AD results in a 10%-25% incidence of long-term side effects, particularly lymphedema. Moreover, many small primary lesions with low risk of ANI are now discovered by screening, and it is not clear whether AD should be used routinely in all such patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a selective procedure that allows selective staging of the axilla with few side effects. However, indications for SLNB are not precisely defined yet, so some patients may be understaged and the axillary relapse rate may increase. This study was conducted to help clinicians assess the risk of ANI and analyzed six clinical and histological parameters to optimally recognize patients who might benefit from SLNB, with a minimal risk of false-negative rate. We retrospectively analyzed the ANI risk among 893 women treated by conservative surgery and radiation for T0, T1, or T2 invasive tumours < 3 cm in size. All patients underwent AD with sampling of a minimum of seven lymph nodes. In each case, we assessed the clinical and pathological tumor size, histological subtype (including grading), tumor location, age at diagnosis, and breast size. The global ANI rate in the entire cohort was 25.3%. In multivariate analysis, three variables were significantly predictive of the ANI risk: tumor size (P < 0.0001), histological subtype (P = 0.0005), and breast size (P = 0.004). By combining these parameters, we were able to define three categories of women with low (< 20%), intermediate (21%-25%), and high (> 25%) ANI risk. We suggest that women with nonpalpable (T0), T1 grade 1/2, and T2 < 3 cm tumors of medullary, mucinous, tubular, or papillary histological subtype are the best candidates for SLNB. For other patients with a higher ANI risk tumor, AD may still remain the best procedure to obtain accurate staging and definitive local control.

Axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer--current status and controversies, alternative strategies and future perspectives

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has traditionally been considered as a standard procedure in the surgical management of patients with breast cancer. The goals of ALND in breast cancer surgery are: (a) to provide accurate prognostic information, (b) to maintain local control of the disease in the axilla and (c) to provide a rational basis for decisions about adjuvant therapy. Although controversial, ALND may also be associated with a small therapeutic benefit. Recently, the question of whether ALND is needed for every patient with invasive breast cancer has been the subject of ongoing debate in the literature. This is mainly due to the widespread use of adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with node-negative breast cancer and to the increasingly frequent detection of small invasive cancers by mammographic screening; the majority of these patients have negative axillae. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new, promising, minimally invasive procedure, which accurately predicts nodal status with minimal morbidity, and reserves ALND for patients with positive SLN biopsies. However, this method is still investigational. Partial (levels I and II) ALND remains the gold standard in the surgical management of patients with breast cancer.

[Lymph node mapping and axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in 243 invasive breast cancers with no palpable nodes. The south Lyon hospital center experience]

STUDY AIM

To evaluate the effect of intraoperative lymph node mapping and sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) on the axillary staging of patients with N0 breast carcinoma. Two techniques were used: blue dye alone (Evans Blue and Patent Blue) and combined technique (blue dye and isotope).

METHODS

The incidence of axillary node metastasis in axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and SLND was compared prospectively. Multiple sections of each SLN were examined by HPS staining and immunohistochemical techniques. Two sections of each non sentinel node in ALND specimens were examined by routine HPS staining.

RESULTS

243 patients underwent ALND after SLN biopsy. The SLN detection rate was 225/243 cases (92.59%): 89.94% with blue dye alone and 100% with the combined technique. The false-negative rate was less than 2%.

CONCLUSION

SN biopsy is an accurate staging technique for N0 breast cancer. SLN biopsy with multiple sections and immunohistochemical staining of the SLN can identify significantly more patients with lymph node metastases than ALND with routine HPS staining.

Can axillary dissection be avoided by improved molecular biological diagnosis?

Axillary dissection is presently a routine staging procedure in the management of breast cancer. The use of adjuvant systemic treatment is largely based on the diagnosis of axillary metastases. Routine axillary dissection leads to acute and chronic side-effects in a large proportion of patients. The sentinel node technique is presently explored with the aim of decreasing the need for standard axillary dissection. A complementary way forward is to analyse the primary breast cancer for molecular markers with prognostic significance with reference to the risk for metastatic capacity and thereby obtain a 'biological staging' and identify those patients in need of systemic adjuvant therapy. A large number of molecular biological factors have been shown to have prognostic significance in breast cancer e.g. c-erbB-2, p53, uPA, PAI-I and VEGF. This article reviews the expression of these and other factors in the primary breast cancers in relation to the risk for axillary and systemic metastatic disease, with the long-term aim of excluding routine axillary dissection.

The relationship between lymphatic vessell invasion, tumor size, and pathologic nodal status: can we predict who can avoid a third field in the absence of axillary dissection?

PURPOSE

Tangential (2-field) radiation therapy to the breast and lower axilla is typically used in our institution for treating patients with early-stage breast cancer who have 0-3 positive axillary nodes, as determined by axillary dissection, whereas a third supraclavicular/axillary field is added for patients with 4 or more positive nodes. However, dissection may result in complications and added expense. We, therefore, assessed whether clinical or pathologic factors of the primary tumor could reliably predict, in the absence of an axillary dissection, which patients with clinically negative axillary nodes have such limited pathologic nodal involvement that they might be effectively treated with only tangential fields. This would eliminate both the complications of axillary dissection and the added complexity and potential morbidity of a supraclavicular/axillary field.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this study, 722 women with clinical Stage I or II unilateral invasive breast cancer of infiltrating ductal histology, with clinically negative axillary nodes, at least 6 lymph nodes recovered on axillary dissection, and central pathology review were treated with breast-conserving therapy from 1968 to 1987. Pathologic nodal status was assessed in relation to clinical T stage, the presence of lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI), age, histologic grade, and the location of the primary tumor.

RESULTS

LVI, T stage, and tumor location were each significantly correlated with nodal status on univariate analysis. Ninety-seven percent of LVI-negative patients had 0-3 positive axillary nodes compared to 87% of LVI-positive patients. There was no association between T stage and extent of axillary involvement within LVI-negative and LVI-positive subgroups. In a logistic regression model, only LVI remained a significant predictor of having 4 or more positive nodes, although tumor size was of borderline significance. The odds ratio for LVI (positive vs. negative) as a predictor of having 4 or more positive nodes was 3.9 (95% CI, 2.0-7.6).

CONCLUSION

For patients with clinical T1-2, N0, infiltrating ductal carcinomas, the presence of LVI is predictive of having 4 or more positive axillary nodes. Only 3% of patients with clinical T1-2, N0, LVI-negative breast cancers had 4 or more positive nodes on axillary dissection. Such patients may be reasonable candidates for treatment with tangential radiation fields in the absence of axillary dissection.

Breast cancer patients treated without axillary surgery: clinical implications and biologic analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of breast carcinoma (T1-2N0) surgery without axillary dissection on axillary and distant relapses, and to evaluate the usefulness of a panel of pathobiologic parameters determined from the primary tumor, independent of axillary nodal status, in planning adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

In a prospective nonrandomized pilot study, 401 breast cancer patients who underwent breast surgery without axillary dissection were accrued from January 1986 to June 1994. At surgery, all patients were clinically node-negative and lacked evidence of distant metastases after clinical or radiologic examination. A precise 4-month clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed to detect axillary or distant metastases. Patients with clinical evidence of axillary nodal relapse were considered for surgery as salvage treatment. Biologic characteristics of primary carcinomas were investigated by immunohistochemistry, and four pathologic and biologic parameters (size, grading, laminin receptor, and c-erbB-2 receptor) were analyzed to determine a prognostic score.

RESULTS

The 5-year follow-up of these patients revealed a low rate of nodal relapses (6.7%), particularly for T1a and T1b patients (2% and 1.7%, respectively), whereas T1c and T2 patients showed a 10% and 18% relapse rate, respectively. Surgery was a safe and feasible salvage treatment without technical problems in all 19 cases of progressive disease at the axillary level. The low rate of distant metastases in T1a and T1b groups (<6%) increased to 15% in T1c and 34% in T2 patients. Analyzing the primary tumor with respect to the panel of pathologic and biologic parameters was predictive of metastatic spread and therefore can replace nodal status information for planning adjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle-term follow-up shows that the rate of axillary relapse in this patient population is lower than expected, suggesting that only a minimal number of microembolic nodal metastases become clinically evident. Avoidance of axillary dissection has a negligible effect on the outcome of T1 patients, particularly in T1a and T1b tumors with no palpable nodes, because the rate of axillary node relapse is very low for both. In T1 breast carcinoma, postsurgical therapy should be considered on the basis of biologic characteristics rather than nodal involvement. The authors' prognostic score based on the primary tumor identified patients who required postsurgical treatment, providing a practical alternative to axillary status for deciding on adjuvant treatment. Conversely, in the T2 group, the high rate of salvage surgery for axillary relapses, which is expected in tumors larger than 2.5 cm or 3.0 cm, represents a limit for avoiding axillary dissection. Preoperative evaluation of axillary nodes for modification of surgical dissection in this subgroup would be more useful more than in T1 breast cancer because of the high risk. Complete dissection is feasible without technical problems if precise follow-up detects progressive axillary disease.

The risk of nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes: a population-based analysis

A population-based study was performed to assess the likelihood of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with clinically negative lymph nodes, according to patient age, tumor size and site, estrogen receptor status, histologic type and mode of detection. Data were obtained from the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry. During the period 1984-1997, 7680 patients with invasive breast cancer were documented, 6663 of whom underwent axillary dissection. Of the 5125 patients who were known to have clinically negative lymph nodes and underwent axillary dissection, 1748 (34%) had positive lymph nodes at pathological examination. After multivariate analysis, histologic type, tumor size, tumor site and the number of lymph nodes in the axillary specimen remained as independent predictors of the risk of nodal involvement (P < 0.001). Lower risks were found for patients with medullary or tubular carcinoma, smaller tumors, a tumor in the medial part of the breast and patients with less than 16 nodes examined. This study gives reliable estimates of the risk of finding positive lymph nodes in patients with a clinically negative axilla. Such information is useful when considering the need for axillary dissection and to predict the risk of a false-negative result when performing sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Role of axillary surgery in early breast cancer: review of the current evidence

BACKGROUND

Controversy continues to surround the best practice for management of the axilla in patients with early breast cancer (EBC), particularly the clinically negative axilla. The balance between therapeutic and staging roles of axillary surgery (with the consequent morbidity of the procedures utilized) has altered. This is due to the increasing frequency of women presenting with early stage disease, the more widespread utilization of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy and, more recently, the advent of alternative staging procedures, principally sentinel node biopsy (SNB). The aim of the present review is to critically analyse the current literature concerning the preferred management of the axilla in early breast cancer and make evidence-based recommendations on current management.

METHODS

A review was undertaken of the English language medical literature, using MEDLINE database software and cross-referencing major articles on the subject, focusing on the last 10 years. The following combinations of key words have been searched: breast neoplasms, axilla, axillary dissection, survival, prognosis, and sentinel node biopsy.

RESULTS

Despite the trend to more frequent earlier stage diagnosis, levels I and II axillary dissection remain the treatment of choice in the majority of women with EBC and a clinically negative axilla.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel node biopsy has no proven superiority over axillary dissection because no randomized controlled trials have been completed to date. Despite this, SNB will become increasingly utilized due to encouraging results from major centres responsible for its development, and patient demand. Therefore if patients are not being enrolled in clinical trials strict quality controls need to be established at a local level before SNB is allowed to replace standard treatment of the axilla. Unless this is strictly adhered to there is a significant risk of an increase in the frequency of axillary relapse and possible increased understaging and resultant inadequate treatment of patients.

Patient characteristics and treatments associated with a decline in upper-body function following breast cancer therapy

Breast cancer therapy is often followed by a decline in upper-body function. Women (303) diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer were interviewed 5 and 21 months after surgery and their medical records were reviewed. Women with cardiopulmonary comorbidity had an odds ratio for decline at the 5-month interview of 2.8 (95% CI 1.3-5. 7), relative to women without. Women who received mastectomy (OR = 2. 5; 95% CI 0.9-6.7) or breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy (OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.0-8.9) were at higher risk for decline at the 5-month interview than women who received only breast-conserving surgery. Women who had axillary dissection were more likely to report numbness or pain in the axilla (OR = 6.4; 95% CI 1.2-33) at the 21-month interview than women who did not. Clinicians should consider the functional consequences of treatment when discussing treatment options and postoperative care with women who have early stage breast cancer.

Management of the axilla in early breast cancer: is it time to change tack?

The standard surgical treatment of the axilla in patients with early breast cancer is about to undergo a radical change. Although axillary dissection is an excellent procedure for both staging and local control, particularly in the clinically positive axilla, it has considerable morbidity and may understage a significant proportion of patients, because it will usually miss micrometastases that can occur in approximately 10% of 'node negative' patients. An increasing number of patients whose tumours are either non-invasive (ductal carcinoma in situ; DCIS), micro-invasive, tubular cancers or low-grade T1a tumours without lymphovascular invasion may be spared axillary surgery because the risk of axillary disease is 0-3%. Many studies, both prospective trials and large retrospective series, show that axillary radiotherapy alone provides similar local control rates to axillary dissection in patients with clinically negative axillas. Primary treatment of the axilla with radiotherapy alone, however, does not allow appropriate staging. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is being increasingly used in patients with breast cancer to provide this information. When a sentinel node is identified it is equal to or better than axillary dissection for staging the axilla and, if the node is positive, it will help select patients who should then proceed to further axillary surgery or axillary radiotherapy. Although sentinel lymph node biopsy is being rapidly adopted in many centres worldwide, the results of randomized controlled trials are needed before it can be recommended as the standard of care.

Radioguided sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node (SN) biopsy may predict axillary status in breast cancer. We retrospectively analyzed more than 500 SN cases, to suggest more precise indications for the technique.

METHODS

99mTc-labeled colloid was injected close to the tumor; lymphoscintigraphy was then performed to reveal the SN. The next day, during surgery, the SN was removed by using a gamma probe. Complete axillary dissection followed, except in later cases recruited to a randomized trial. The SN was examined intraoperatively by conventional frozen section, in later cases by sampling the entire node and using immunocytochemistry.

RESULTS

In the first series, the SN was identified in 98.7% of cases; in 6.7%, the SN was negative but other axillary nodes were positive; in 32.1%, the SN was negative by intraoperative frozen section but metastatic by definitive histology, prompting introduction of the exhaustive method. In the randomized trial, the SN was identified in all cases so far, the false-negative rate is approximately 6.5%, and in 15 cases, internal mammary chain nodes were biopsied.

CONCLUSIONS

SN biopsy can reliably assess axillary status in selected patients. The problems are the SN detection rate, false negatives, and the intraoperative examination, which can miss 30% of SN metastases. Our exhaustive method overcomes the latter problem, but it is time consuming.

Lymphatic invasion, tumor size, and age are independent predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in women with T1 breast cancers

OBJECTIVE

To identify characteristics of the primary tumor highly associated with lymph node metastases.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Recent enthusiasm for limiting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in women with breast cancer may increase the likelihood that nodal metastases will be missed. Identification of characteristics of primary tumors predictive of lymph node metastases may prompt a more extensive surgical and pathologic search for metastases in patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes or limited ALND.

METHODS

The authors studied 850 consecutive patients who underwent ALND for T1 breast cancer. Age, tumor size, histopathologic diagnosis, tumor differentiation, presence of lymphatic invasion, and estrogen and progesterone receptor results were studied prospectively. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify variables independently associated with axillary lymph node metastases.

RESULTS

Lymphatic invasion, tumor size, and age were independently associated with lymph node metastases. Fifty-one percent of the 181 patients with lymphatic invasion had axillary lymph node metastases, compared with 19% of the 669 patients without lymphatic invasion. Thirty-five percent of the 470 patients with tumors >1 cm had nodal involvement compared with 13% of the 380 patients with smaller cancers. Thirty-seven percent of the 63 women younger than age 40 had lymph node involvement compared with 25% of the 787 women older than age 40. Significant correlations were noted between lymphatic invasion and patient age and between lymphatic invasion and tumor size. The proportion of tumors with lymphatic invasion decreased progressively with increasing age and increased with increasing tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary lymph node metastases are most significantly related to lymphatic invasion in the primary tumor, followed, in order of significance, by tumor size and patient age. Axillary nodal metastases should be suspected in the presence of lymphatic invasion of large tumors in young patients.

Factors associated with axillary lymph node metastasis from breast carcinoma: descriptive and predictive analyses

BACKGROUND

Although axillary lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic determinants of breast carcinoma prognoses, the reasons why tumors vary in their capability to produce for axillary metastases remain unclear.

METHODS

The authors used data from the nationwide Patient Care Evaluation (PCE) survey of the American College of Surgeons to evaluate the correlations between patient/tumor characteristics and lymph node status, and to explore the use of these factors, which are all known prior to axillary dissection, in predicting lymph node status. The PCE data set contained 18,025 breast carcinoma cases diagnosed in 1990 after exclusion of women older than 79 years or with fewer than 6 lymph nodes examined.

RESULTS

In a multivariate logistic regression model, larger tumor size, young age, African American or Hispanic race, outer half tumor location, poor or moderate differentiation, aneuploidy, and infiltrating ductal histology were independently associated with a higher likelihood of one or more positive lymph nodes. Contrary to expectation, cases negative for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) had a lower risk of positive lymph nodes when adjusted for other factors (odds ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.91) compared with cases positive for both receptors. This model accurately predicted lymph node status in 2 validation data sets (a 50% random sample of 1990 PCE data and 1992 data from the National Cancer Data Base), but was less accurate in a third, older data set (1983 PCE data). However, the percentage of cases (1990 validation set) with predicted probabilities less than 0.05 or greater than 0.95 were only 4.6% and <0.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors concluded that 1) most variation in axillary lymph node metastatic status can be explained by routinely available data, 2) ER and PR status may be involved in the mechanism of this behavior, and 3) the difficulty of using prediction models to avert axillary dissection should not be underestimated.

Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with invasive breast carcinoma by a combination of classical and biological prognostic factors

The presence of axillary lymph node metastases (ALNMs) is the most important prognostic factor in breast carcinoma. If ALNMs were predictable without performing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), this procedure would not be necessary in selected patients. Using a combination of some of the new biological markers with the classical ones, our objective was I) to identify the best set of predictors of ALNMs, and II) to define predictive models with either high or low probability of ALNMs. We studied 102 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. All patients underwent ALND, and at least 10 axillary lymph nodes per case were obtained. In the primary tumour we evaluated size, histological subtype and grade, lymphatic/vascular invasion and margin. Hormone receptor status, MIB1 index, microvessel density, c-erbB-2 and cathepsin D expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry, and DNA ploidy and S-phase by flow cytometry. Risk factors for ALNMs were estimated by nonlinear logistic regression analysis. The best predictors of ALNMs were: tumour size > 2 cm [OR 6.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 21.74 to 1.91], presence of lymphatic/vascular invasion [OR 4.95, CI (14.50 to 1.69)], infiltrative margin [OR 9.87 CI (37.44 to 2.60)] and high MIB-1 index [OR 8.39, CI (33.47 to 2.10)]. Two subsets had a very high risk of ALNMs: I) tumour size > 2 cm, with lymphatic/vascular invasion and infiltrative margin; 26 (89.66%) of 29 patients of this subgroup had ALNMs, and (II) tumour size > 2 cm, with lymphatic/vascular and high MIB1 index.; eight of the nine (89%) patients of this subgroup had ALNMs. We could also identify a two-variable model with a very low risk of ALNMs constituted by tumour with circumscribed margin and low MIB-1 index. Of the 19 patients showing these features, only 1 (5.26%) had ALNMs. Therefore, pathological features of the primary tumour can help to assess the risk for ALNM in invasive breast carcinoma. Such risk assessment might avoid regional surgical overtreatment.

Dissemination risk index based on plasminogen activator system components in primary breast cancer

PURPOSE

To study interactions between disease-free survival (DFS) and four components of the plasminogen activator system: urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its two inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2), and its membrane receptor uPAR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 499 primary breast cancer patients (median follow-up, 6 years). uPA, PAI-1, and PAI-2 were determined on cytosols and uPAR on solubilized pellets, using enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay kits (American Diagnostica, Greenwich, CT). Classical univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used together with multiple correspondence analysis to graphically examine interactions between the variables and outcome.

RESULTS

By univariate analysis, higher uPA and PAI-1 values were significantly related to shorter DFS (P =.002; P <.00002). PAI-2 was not significantly related to DFS, although patients with high and very low PAI-2 values had a longer DFS. Multiple correspondence analysis showed the parallel impact of uPA and PAI-1 on outcome, and the clearly different behavior of PAI-2 compared with PAI-1. The prognostic contribution of uPAR seemed weak by both methods. A dissemination risk index [uPA x PAI-1/(PAI-2 + 1)], taking into account the modulation of uPA proteolytic activity by the ratio of its two inhibitors, was then tested. Dissemination risk index was selected as an independent variable in the Cox model in the overall population (P <.000001) and in node-positive patients (P <.00001). It was the only variable selected in node-negative patients (P =. 003).

CONCLUSION

A dissemination risk index determined on primary tumor and taking into account the different effects of PAI-1 and PAI-2 on uPA can be of major help in clinical management of breast cancer, particularly in node-negative patients.

Predictive Value of Flow Cytometry for Metastatic Potential in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the leading malignancy in women in the United States. Tumor size and nodal metastases have been the most important predictors of patient outcome and determinants of treatment, but have also been used to predict metastatic potential. This study was undertaken to ascertain the predictive value of flow cytometry for lymph node or systemic metastases. From 1994 through 1997, surgical specimens from 106 women who underwent treatment for invasive breast cancer were reviewed. Epidemiological data, tumor stage, nodal metastases, and flow cytometric data were collected. Analysis of variance and Student's t test were used to determine whether the presence of nodal metastases or distant metastases correlated with high S phase values and aneuploidy. Of the 106 patients studied, the mean age was 57 years; tumor size consisted of 35 per cent T1, 48 per cent T2, 8 per cent T3, and 9 per cent T4. Node status was found in the following distribution: 56 per cent node negative, 38 per cent N1, and 6 per cent N2. Distant metastases were present in four patients. Elevated S phase (defined as >9.0%) was present in 72 per cent of the population. Fifty-six per cent of these tumors were aneuploid. Node-negative patients had an elevated S phase in 66 per cent of cases, whereas node-positive patients had an elevated S phase in 71 per cent of cases. Neither S phase (P = 0.91) nor DNA index (P = 0.99) proved to be statistically significant in determining axillary node status. Neither did S phase (P = 0.87) nor DNA index (P = 0.48) consistently predict the presence of distant metastases. There is no statistical correlation between axillary node status and flow cytometric data. Breast cancers with high S phase values and aneuploid features do not reliably have axillary nodal metastases, and this data cannot replace that information provided by axillary node dissection. Synchronous systemic metastatic disease is also not predicted by flow cytometry.

S-phase fraction and breast cancer--a decade of experience

During the past decade, more than 300 articles, abstracts, and book chapters have been published about S-phase fraction (SPF) determined by DNA flow cytometry and its clinical utility for patients with breast cancer. However, the use of SPF for making treatment decisions for breast cancer patients remains controversial. After reviewing 273 published articles, we conclude: 1) Despite different techniques and cutpoints, correlations between SPF and other prognostic markers are relatively consistent across studies; higher SPF is generally associated with worse tumor grade, absence of steroid receptors, larger tumors, and positive axillary lymph nodes. 2) Higher SPF is generally associated with worse disease-free and overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses; SPF values from laboratories that have conducted validation studies can be used, in combination with other factors, to estimate the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. 3) There is considerable variability among laboratories regarding assay methodology, cell-cycle analysis techniques, and cutpoints for classifying and interpreting SPF; use of SPF values from different laboratories is problematic, and there remains a need for standardization of these processes and well-designed confirmation studies. We conclude that measurement of SPF does have clinical utility for patients with breast cancer, but standardization and quality control must be improved before it can be routinely used in community settings.

Prognostic factors for patients with breast cancers 1cm and smaller

The widespread use of mammography has resulted in the detection of an increasing number of small invasive breast cancers, i.e. those that are 1cm and smaller. Patients with these small cancers generally have a low incidence of axillary lymph node metastases, and this has led some to question the routine use of axillary dissection in these patients. In addition, the prognosis of these patients is generally favorable, and the routine use of adjuvant systemic therapy is difficult to justify. Nonetheless, some patients with these small invasive cancers will have axillary nodal involvement and/or develop metastatic disease. The identification of this prognostically unfavorable subset of patients within this otherwise favorable group is an important goal of clinical research. In this article, we review the available literature on prognostic factors for patients with breast cancers 1cm and smaller to help determine which of these features might be of value in the identification of patients at risk for axillary lymph node involvement and/or metastatic disease.

Sentinel lymphadenectomy: a safe answer to less axillary surgery?

Lymphatic mapping techniques have the potential of changing the standard of surgical care of breast cancer patients. This paper reports a prospective study documenting the safety and efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in 167 breast cancer patients and reviews the world literature on the procedure.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-seven patients with newly diagnosed breast cancers underwent a prospective trial of intra-operative lymphatic mapping using a combination of vital blue dye and filtered technetium-labeled sulfur colloid. A sentinel lymph node (SLN) was defined as a blue node and/or "hot" node with a 10/1 ex-vivo gamma-probe ratio of SLN to non-SLN. All SLN were bi-valved, step-sectioned, and examined with routine H&E stains and immunohistochemical stains for cytokeratin. Cytokeratin-positive SLN were defined as any SLN with a defined cluster of positive staining cells which could be confirmed histologically on H&E sections. Finally, a review of the worldwide data was undertaken using a uniform analytical method to compare the rates of sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and false negatives of SLN mapping.

RESULTS

In 167 patients, 337 SLN were harvested, for an average of 2.01 SLN/patient. Fifty-two (31.1%) of the patients had metastasis in the SLN. In the 115 patients with negative SLN, 1 was found to have tumor in higher axillary nodes, for a false negative rate of 0.88%. Fifty-nine (37.8%) of the patients were diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration, 89 (53.3%) by excisional biopsy, and 19 (11.4%) by core biopsy. Positive SLN were identified in 1/17 (5.9%) patients with DCIS. Metastasis was found in 33/115 (28.7%) of the patients with infiltrating ductal tumors and in 11/19 (57.9%) of the patients with infiltrating lobular tumors. Positive SLN were identified in 7/16 (43.7%) of the patients with mixed cellularity tumors. Metastasis in the SLN was detected in 7/55 (12.7%) of the 59 patients with T1a-T1b tumors and in 21/58 (36.2%) of the patients with T1c tumors. Positive SLN were found in 17/30 (56.7%) of the patients with T2 tumors and in 6/7 (85.7%) of the patients with T3 tumors. A literature review of 731 patients (including this study) demonstrates a sensitivity rate of 95% and a diagnostic accuracy rate of 98%. The overall false negative rate is 3.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that SLN biopsy is a highly sensitive and accurate method of predicting axillary nodal status. It is a reproducible technique that is easily learned. The future addition of more sensitive methods such as PCR evaluation of nodal involvement may reduce the need for widespread use of adjuvant chemotherapy with its high cost and attendant morbidity and mortality. We believe that this technique will eventually become the standard of care in the treatment of breast cancer, particularly for T1 and T2 lesions and perhaps also for high-grade DCIS tumors.

Initial experience with sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer at the National Cancer Center Hospital East

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node dissection is an important procedure in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Axillary lymph node dissection is still performed in over half of breast cancer patients having histologically negative nodes, regardless of the morbidity in terms of axillary pain, numbness and lymphedema. The first regional lymph nodes draining a primary tumor are the sentinel lymph nodes. Sentinel node biopsy is a promising surgical technique for predicting histological findings in the remaining axillary lymph nodes, especially in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer, and a worldwide feasibility study is currently in progress.

METHODS

Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy were performed in the axilla by subcutaneous injection of blue dye (indigocarmine) in 88 cases of stage 0-IIIB breast cancer. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified by detecting blue-staining lymph nodes or dye-filled lymphatic tracts after total or partial mastectomy. Finally, axillary lymph node dissection was performed up to Levels I and II or more.

RESULTS

Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified in 65 of the 88 cases (74%). In the final histological examination, the sentinel lymph nodes in 40 cases were negative, including four cases with non-sentinel-node-positive breast cancer (specificity, 100%; sensitivity, 86%). In nine (31%) of the 29 cases with histologically node-positive breast cancer, the sentinel lymph nodes were the only lymph nodes affected. Axillary lymph node status was accurately predicted in 61 (94%) of the 65 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it was the initial experience at the National Cancer Center Hospital East, sentinel node biopsy proved feasible and successful. This method may be a reasonable alternative to the standard axillary lymph node dissection in patients with early breast cancer.

Accuracy of AJCC staging for breast cancer patients undergoing re-excision for positive margins. American Joint Committee on Cancer

BACKGROUND

The current AJCC protocol for breast cancer staging does not include additional tumor found at the time of re-excision in the calculation of tumor size. We hypothesize that the AJCC protocol may result in understaging and undertreatment of breast cancer patients who have additional tumor found at re-excision.

METHODS

In a retrospective chart review of breast cancer patients, patients with tumor present at re-excision for positive margins were placed in group 1 (n=72); patients with no tumor present at re-excision, or who underwent a single, negative margin procedure were placed in group 2 (n=147).

RESULTS

Patients in group 1 had a higher risk of nodal metastases when compared to patients in group 2. Mean tumor size did not differ significantly between the subgroups. Positive re-excision was strongly associated with lymph node metastases on multivariate analysis after correction for age, grade, stage, and lymphatic invasion (odds ratio=3.13, 95% CI=1.58 6.18, P=.0011).

CONCLUSIONS

Current AJCC guidelines may result in undertreatment of breast cancer patients with positive re-excisions. The presence of additional tumor at the time of re-excision should be considered when determining the need for systemic therapy, and may be relevant in determining T stage.

[Is axillary dissection in clinically lymph node-negative breast carcinoma further indicated?]

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of breast cancer, the indication for adjuvant systemic treatment was extended also to nodal negative tumor stages in the last years. For that reason, the indicator status of axillary dissection lost some of its importance. Therefore, in node negative patients, the necessity of axillary dissection and the use of definitive axillary radiotherapy, which causes less morbidity, may be reconsidered.

METHODS

In a review of the related literature, we present international treatment experiences related to axillary dissection, axillary radiotherapy and "sentinel node dissection" (SLND). In addition, our long-term experiences in 19 patients with clinically negative axillary nodes treated by conservative surgery without axillary dissection but axillary radiotherapy, are reported.

RESULTS

The median rate of axillary recurrences with axillary radiotherapy is 2.0%, the regional (supraclavicular and retrosternal) recurrence rate 2.7%. With axillary dissection, axillary recurrences occur in 1 to 2%, in nodal negative stages in 0 to 1%, the median regional recurrence rate is 2.2%. A meta-analysis presented in 1995 by the Early Breast Cancer Study Group showed no significant difference in the regional recurrence rate or the overall survival between axillary dissection and axillary radiotherapy. With SLND, usually only one axillary node is excised. With the help of molecular and immunohistochemical methods, SLND may predict axillary involvement with high precision.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive radiotherapy of the axilla is a valid treatment option for patients without palpable axillary nodes with the potential advantage of being less cost intensive and better tolerated. If the indication for systemic therapy is no more dependent on the axillary status, axillary dissection may be replaced by axillary radiotherapy. In small tumors without risk factors and without indication for systemic therapy, SLND seems to be the best treatment option.

Image-guided core breast biopsy: a suitable method for preoperative biological characterization of small (pT1) breast carcinomas

Multiple prognostic indicators, namely histological grade and immunostaining for estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR), MIB 1, bc1-2, and p53, were retrospectively determined on preoperative core biopsies from 75 patients with pT 1 breast carcinoma. The association of the preoperatively evaluated factors with those on the corresponding resected tumors (i.e. nodal status, histological grade, presence or absence of vascular invasion and necrosis) was assessed. In univariate analysis, histological grade on resected tumors was significantly associated with histological grade on core biopsy, p53 expression, MIB1 immunostaining. An inverse association was found between postoperative histologic grade and ER, PgR, and bc1-2. Necrosis was significantly associated with grade, p53, MIB1, and inversely with ER, PgR, and bc1-2. Nodal involvement and vascular invasion were significantly associated with MIB1. In multivariate analysis, histological grade and ER were the only independent core biopsy variables associated with postoperative histological grade and necrosis, respectively. This study showed that image-guided core biopsy is a suitable method that can be used to reveal some characteristics of the tumor biology in a preoperative stage.

Complications of axillary lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the breast: a report based on a patient survey

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node dissection is commonly performed as part of the primary management of breast carcinoma. Its value in patient management, however, has recently been questioned. Few studies exist that document long term complications.

METHODS

Four hundred thirty-two patients with Stage I or II breast carcinoma who were free of recurrence 2-5 years after surgery were identified. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine the prevalence of long term symptoms and complications as perceived by the patient, and patient and treatment factors that may have predicted complications were determined. Three hundred thirty of the 432 (76%) completed a mailed, self-administered questionnaire. In addition, the medical records of the 330 patients were reviewed. Patient and treatment factors were analyzed with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Numbness was reported by 35% of patients at the time of the survey. Pain was noted in 30%, arm swelling in 15%, and limitation of arm movement in 8%. Eight percent reported episodes of infection or inflammation at some point since the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. The majority of symptoms were mild and interfered minimally with daily activities. Younger age (P=0.001) was associated with more frequent reporting of pain. Numbness was more common in younger patients (P=0.004) as well as in those with a history of smoking (P=0.012). There was a positive association of limitation of arm motion with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy (P=0.016). Arm swelling was associated with both younger age (P=0.004) and greater body surface area (P=0.008). Radiation therapy was associated with a higher frequency of infection or inflammation in the arm and/or breast (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mild symptoms, especially pain and numbness, are common 2-5 years after axillary lymph node dissection. The frequency of inflammation or infection in patients treated with radiation to the breast or chest wall after an axillary lymph node dissection may be greater than previously appreciated. Severe complications or symptoms that have a major impact on daily activities are uncommon. These findings should help health care providers and their patients with breast carcinoma weigh the pros and cons of axillary lymph node dissection.

Flow cytometry in breast cancer: prognostic and surgical indications of the sparing of axillary lymph node dissection

The lymph node status is still regarded as the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. However, the utility of axillary lymph node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer as a therapeutic approach rather than a pathologic staging procedure has been recently discussed. DNA index (DI) and S-phase fraction (SPF), evaluated by flow cytometric analysis, are two prognostic factors used especially in the assessment of the adjuvant therapy in stage N0 tumors. By studying a large number of cases, the authors aimed to assess the potential role of flow cytometry in predicting lymph node status. Two hundred eleven patients with breast cancer were included. Each tumor specimen was freshly analyzed by flow cytometry to assess DI and SPF. The authors also evaluated TNM status of patients, estrogen- and progesterone-receptor (ER and Pgr) status, and histologic grades. A group of patients with negative axillary lymph nodes was identified by means of association of tumor size of 2 cm or less, DI of 1, and SPF less than 7%. The ER and PgR status as well as histologic grade were significantly more favorable in this group of patients. These findings indicate that association of DI, SPF value, and tumor size may be predictive of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer.

[Evaluating the risk of axillary lymph node involvement in inferior breast cancer measuring 3 centimeters. Analysis of a predictive model based on 893 cases]

STUDY AIM

The aim of the study was to assess, by clinical and histological predictive factors, the axillary lymph-node involvement (pN+) in early breast cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight hundred ninety-three patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer were studied. The evaluated parameters included clinical size (T), pathological size (pT), histological subtype (ductal infiltrating, according to grading 1, 2, 3, lobular infiltrating and others), age (less than 40, 40 to 60 and above 60). Furthermore, a new parameter, the dosimetric breast size, recently described, was included (Eur J Cancer 1997; 33: 2432-4).

RESULTS

The global rate of pN+ was 25.3%, with respectively, pN1: 10%, pN2-3: 8.4% and pN > 3: 6.9%. According to T, the pN+ rates were, respectively, 13.8%, 19.8% and 36.2% in the T0, T1 and T2 < or = 3 cm groups. According to pT, the pN+ rates were, respectively, 11.1%, 17.7%, 23.5%, 30.1% and 36% in the following groups: 0-9.9 mm, 10-14.9 mm, 15-19.9 mm, 20-24.9 mm and 25-29.9 mm. For the ductal infiltrating carcinoma, according to the gradings 1, 2 and 3, we found, respectively, 18.3%, 27.2% and 37.8% of pN+. For the lobular infiltrating carcinoma and the other histological subtypes, the rates were 22.7% and 10%, respectively. For the three age categories cited above the pN+ rates were, respectively, 30.3%, 25.8% and 22.4%. According to breast size we found 30.1% and 24.4% of pN+ respectively for small and medium or large dosimetric breast size. After a multivariate analysis, three factors were significant for pN+ risk: clinical tumor size (P = 0.0001), histological subtype (P = 0.0005) and dosimetric breast size (P = 0.004). With a combination of these three factors, the pN+ rates varied from 5% to 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that both clinical and pathological characteristics of the primary tumor (specified by previous core biopsy) can indicate the risk for axillary node metastases, and allow selection of candidates for limited axilla surgery (sentinel node).

Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer may be used in place of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if SNB accurately stages the axilla. This study assessed the success and accuracy of axillary SNB with isosulfan blue (ISB) and technetium-99 sulfur colloid (TSC) compared to ALND.

METHODS

Forty-two women with T1 or T2 breast cancer underwent SNB and ALND. Sixty to 90 minutes before anesthetic induction, a mixture of 3 mL ISB and 1 mCi TSC was injected around the primary cancer or prior biopsy site. Intraoperatively, the SLN was identified using a gamma detector (Neoprobe 1000) or by visualization of the blue-stained lymph node and afferent lymphatics. The SLN was excised separately, and a level I/II ALND was completed. The histologic findings of the axillary contents and SLN were compared.

RESULTS

An axillary SLN was found in 38 of 42 (90%) cases. SLN localization rate and predictive value were the same for women who had and those who had not undergone excisional biopsy before the date of SNB. Fifteen of 42 (36%) patients had lymph node metastases. The SLN was positive in all women with axillary metastases (negative predictive value, 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

If confirmed by larger series, a negative SNB may eliminate the need for ALND for select women with breast cancer.

Assessment of preference for breast cancer chemoprevention in Japanese young women

Pills containing estrogen and progesterone or gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist have been considered valuable to prevent breast cancer. This study assessed preference for the combination-type pill for preventing breast cancer, to evaluate the hypothetical preventive effect of this agent among young Japanese women. The standard gamble method was applied. Fifty-five college students and 44 nursing school students aged between 18 and 41 years were asked to decide the probability of being affected by breast cancer at which they would start to take this agent. Preference score was calculated by subtracting the probability given by each respondent from 1, which corresponds to the value (utility) she allotted to the agent. The means of preference score were 0.58, 0.48, 0.37, and 0.27 for 100, 75, 50, and 25% of efficacy levels of the agent, respectively. Preference score was significantly lower in nursing school students and those whose knowledge about hormones were relatively high. Score of Health Locus of Control (HLC) was nonsignificantly negatively correlated with preference score at any efficacy level. HLC score was significantly higher among those who refused the agent with 50 and 25% efficacy levels at 100% level of breast cancer risk. The data suggest that perceived risk of this agent was not negligibly small in this population and school status, knowledge about hormones, and beliefs about health would affect preference for the agent. Understanding of preference for chemopreventive agents for breast cancer, especially those containing hormones, is important to assess their potential as future preventive agents and is helpful when planning a strategy of chemoprevention.

Does information from axillary dissection change treatment in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer? An algorithm for assessment of impact of axillary dissection

OBJECTIVE

The authors assessed the impact of axillary dissection on adjuvant systemic therapy recommendations in patients with breast cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

With increasing use of systemic therapy in node-negative women and the desire to reduce treatment morbidity and cost, the need for axillary dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer has been challenged.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty-two women with clinically negative axillae were analyzed using a model treatment algorithm. Systemic therapy was assigned with and without data from axillary dissection. Treatment shifts based on axillary dissection data were scored.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven percent of clinically node-negative women had pathologically positive nodes. Eight percent of T1a and 10% of T1b tumors had positive nodes and would have been undertreated without axillary dissection. Seven percent of premenopausal women with tumors < 1 cm and 13% with tumors > or = 1 cm had treatment changed by axillary dissection. For women 50 to 60 years of age, 10% with tumors < 1 cm, 17% with tumors 1 to 2 cm with positive prognostic features, and 4% with poor prognostic features had significant treatment shifts after axillary dissection. For clinically node-negative women older than 60 years of age not eligible for chemotherapy, only 3% of those with tumors < 1 cm and none of those with tumors > or = 1 cm had their treatment changed by findings at axillary dissection. Treatment shifts based on axillary dissection were larger if the treatment algorithm allowed for more varied or more aggressive treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

Data obtained from axillary dissection will alter adjuvant systemic therapy regimen in a significant number of clinically node-negative women younger than 60 years of age and for older women eligible to receive chemotherapy.