The use of marginal donors for liver transplantation. A retrospective study of 365 liver donors

Effect of extended cold ischemia time on glucose metabolism in liver grafts: experimental study in pigs

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Recovery of normal carbohydrate metabolism in the liver after transplantation is highly important. The aim of the present study was to evaluate how short and long cold ischemia (CI) time followed by warm ischemia (WI) impact intrahepatic glucose metabolism in a pig liver transplantation model.

METHODS

Twenty-six animals were divided into two transplantation groups: group I with a liver ischemia time of 5 h (n = 6), and group II with 15 h of liver ischemia (n = 7). Intrahepatic microdialysis samples were collected throughout the experiment at 20-min intervals, during the donor operation, cold preservation, liver implantation, and liver reperfusion in the recipient. Glucose, lactate, and pyruvate concentrations were analyzed and the lactate/pyruvate ratio (L/Pr) was calculated.

RESULT

There were no changes in glucose levels during CI. However, during WI, glucose and lactate increased and the increase was significantly higher in the group with longer CI (P < 0.01). The L/Pr increased at the beginning of CI but accelerated to increase during WI in both groups, with significantly prolonged and higher levels in the group with longer CI (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended CI results in increased intrahepatic glycogenolysis, delayed restoration of aerobic glycolysis, and prolonged anaerobic glycolysis shortly after reperfusion. Improvements in glycogen protection and faster restoration of aerobic metabolism during preservation and reperfusion time seem to be necessary in order to improve liver preservation protocols per se.

Liver retransplantation for primary nonfunction: analysis of a 20-year single-center experience

Initial graft function following liver transplantation is a major determinant of postoperative survival and morbidity. Primary graft nonfunction (PNF) is uncommon; however, it is one of the most serious and life-threatening conditions in the immediate postoperative period. The risk factors associated with PNF and short-term outcome have been previously reported, but there are no reports of long-term follow-up after retransplant for PNF. At our institution, 52 liver transplants had PNF (2.22%) among 2,341 orthotopic liver transplants in 2,130 patients from 1984 to 2003. PNF occurred more often in the retransplant setting. Female donors, donor age, donor days in the intensive care unit, cold ischemia time, and operating room time were significant factors for PNF. Patient as well as graft survival of retransplant for PNF was not different compared to retransplant for other causes. However, PNF for a second or third transplant did not demonstrate long-term survival, and hospital mortality was 57%. In conclusion, retransplant for PNF in the initial transplant can achieve relatively good long-term survival; however, if another transplant is needed in the setting of a second PNF, the third retransplant should probably not be done due to poor expected outcome.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for end stage liver disease and is often used for primary liver malignancies. The main limitation of its wider application is the availability of suitable donor organs. The use of marginal donor organs, split-liver transplantation and living-related liver transplantation techniques contribute to increase the donor pool. However, the use of these techniques is associated with a higher risk of post transplantation organ dysfunction, predominantly due to ischaemia, preservation and reperfusion injury (IPRI). A number of studies have demonstrated that hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy influences IPRI and consequential acute cellular rejection. This article reviews the rationale of HBO therapy in the field of transplantation with particular emphasis on liver transplantation.

Nontransplantation of livers from deceased donors who are able to donate another solid organ: how often and why it happens

Deceased donor factors associated with poor graft outcome are well known, but how often these factors lead to livers left untransplanted is poorly defined. A nested, case-control study was conducted using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database from 1987 to 2005. Only those donating >/=1 solid organ were included. Primary outcome was livers not transplanted (LNT, cases) versus transplanted (LT, controls). Primary variables for multivariate analysis were donor age and obesity. Covariates included donation after cardiac death (DCD), cerebral vascular accident death, viral serologies, cancer, ALT and bilirubin. There were 23 373 (26%) LNT's from 91 362 donors who donated at least one organ. Percent LNT fell over time (1987-1990: 48%; 1991-1995: 29%; 1996-2000: 21%; 2000-2005: 16%; p < 0.01). Increased age (odds ratio: 4.2, 95% confidence interval 3.6-4.9, p < 0.01) and obesity (2.1, 1.9-2.3, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with LNT across all time periods. Other significant factors included DCD and elevated ALT. For 2001-2005, population attributable risk indicate that age >40, abnormal ALT and obesity account for 32.6%, 25.3% and 9.2% of untransplanted livers, respectively. Use of expanded criteria livers has pushed LNT lower in spite of an aging and heavier donor population. Nevertheless, age and obesity still account for a significant portion of untransplanted livers.

Use of extended criteria livers decreases wait time for liver transplantation without adversely impacting posttransplant survival

INTRODUCTION

The use of extended criteria donors (ECDs) could minimize shortage of suitable donor livers for transplantation. In 3 years, the aggressive use of ECD livers has reduced the wait list at our center from 257 to 30 patients with a median wait time of 18 days without using living donors. This study compares the graft/patient survival from standard (SD) and ECD for our transplant population between 2001 and 2005.

METHODS

Records of all adult liver transplant recipients over 4 years were reviewed (n = 571). ECD criteria included: age >59 years, BMI >34.9, maximum AST/ALT >500, maximum bilirubin >2.0, peak serum sodium >170, HBV/HCV/HTLV reactive, donation after cardiac death, cold ischemia time >12 hours, ICU stay >5 days, 3 or more pressors simultaneously, extensive alcohol abuse, cancer history (nonskin), active meningitis/bacteremia, or significant donor liver trauma. Outcomes included graft and patient survival at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight percent of recipients (n = 388) received ECD livers. Primary factors accounting for ECD-liver status included: elevated liver function tests (20%), hypernatremia (12.6%), and extensive alcohol abuse (11.4%). Graft survival was (SD, ECD): 90-day 91%, 88%; 1-year 84%, 80%; 2-year 78%, 77%; patient survival was: 90-day 93%, 90%; 1-year 87%, 82%; 2-year 83%, 79%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis failed to demonstrate an overall difference in graft or patient survival at any time point. Only donor age >60 years was associated with decreased graft and patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver grafts from ECD can be used to dramatically reduce wait list time with outcomes comparable to those for SD without resorting to living donor liver transplantation.

Scoring Guide When Deciding to Accept an Organ for a Liver Transplant

Our objective was establish a scoring system that allows a donor to be evaluated quickly and easily using a set of variables that are evaluated prior to the donation and another set that are evaluated during surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prior to the donation we analyzed age, medication requirements, natremia, hepatic biochemistry, gas levels, days in ICU, history of hypertension, and weight. A value of 40% was allocated to this group of factors. During the transplant we assessed the characteristics of the organ-shine, consistency, surface, edge, color, presence of steatosis, and atheromatosis. A value of 60% was allocated to this set. We established a scale of 1 to 10, only accepting organs scoring 5 or more points. Those grafts that received a score between 5 and 7.5 points were called suboptimal and those with over 7.5 points, optimal. We prospectively analyzed 133 donors whose organs were implanted.

RESULTS

The survival rate at 1 year was 85%, and the rejection rate was 12%. The incidence of primary graft dysfunction was 8.2% (n = 11) and that of primary graft nonfunction 2.2% (n = 3). The incidence of primary graft dysfunction was greater within the group with fewer points (suboptimal). There were no differences between the optimal and suboptimal groups in terms of primary malfunction, survival, or rejection rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The score provided a guide to decide whether to accept viable organs for implantation, given that the point system was obtained quickly and easily. When greater than 5, it correlated with low rates of primary nonfunction (<3%) and of primary graft dysfunction (<15%), with acceptable survival at 1 year (>80%) and acute rejections rate (<15%).

Liver Transplantation with ???Rescue Organ Offers??? Within the Eurotransplant Area: A 2-year Report From the University Hospital Essen

Liver transplantation (LTx) is the only treatment for patients with end-stage liver failure. This report focuses on 45 deceased donor liver allografts allocated through Eurotransplant as "rescue offers," which were accepted and subsequently transplanted at our center over a two-year period. These organs had been officially offered to and rejected by other transplant centers a total of 162 times prior to our acceptance. Primary nonfunction was observed in six patients. Two of them died and four were retransplanted. Overall patient survival was 84.4%. LTx with such "rescue organs" constitutes an additional transplant option and a safe mechanism to "rescue" organs within Eurotransplant.

Preservation of steatotic livers in IGL-1 solution

A new Institut Georges Lopez (IGL-1) solution was used to preserve steatotic livers. Steatotic (obese [Ob]) and nonsteatotic (lean [Ln]) livers from Zücker rats (n = 16, 8 Ln and 8 Ob) were preserved for 24 hours at 4 degrees C in University of Wisconsin (UW) or IGL-1 solution, respectively, and then perfused ex vivo for 2 hours at 37 degrees C. Additionally, Ob and Ln livers (n = 16, 8 Ln and 8 Ob) were preserved in IGL-1 plus Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME). Hepatic injury and function (aminotransferases, bile production, bromosulfophthalein clearance), and factors potentially involved in the susceptibility of steatotic livers to ischemia-reperfusion injury, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage, and vascular resistance, were studied. Nitric oxide (NO) production and constitutive and inducible NO synthase were also measured. Steatotic and nonsteatotic livers preserved in IGL-1 solution showed lower transaminases, malondialdehyde, glutamate dehydrogenase levels, and higher bile production than UW-solution-preserved livers. IGL-1 solution protected against oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and the alterations in vascular resistance associated with cold ischemia-reperfusion. Thus, at the end of reperfusion period, aspartate aminotransferase levels in steatotic livers were 281 +/- 6 U/L in UW vs. 202 +/- 10 U/L in IGL-1 solution. Glutamate dehydrogenase was 463 +/- 75 U/L in UW vs. 111 +/- 4 U/L in IGL-1 solution, and oxidative stress was 3.0 +/- 0.1 nmol/mg prot in UW vs. 2.0 +/- 0.1 nmol/mg prot in IGL-1 solution. These beneficial effects of IGL-1 solution were abolished by the addition of L-NAME, which implicates NO in the benefits of IGL-1. In conclusion, IGL-1 solution provided steatotic livers with better protection against the deleterious effects of cold ischemia-reperfusion injury than did UW solution.

Optimal utilization of donor grafts with extended criteria: a single-center experience in over 1000 liver transplants

OBJECTIVE

Severely limited organ resources mandate maximum utilization of donor allografts for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This work aimed to identify factors that impact survival outcomes for extended criteria donors (ECD) and developed an ECD scoring system to facilitate graft-recipient matching and optimize utilization of ECDs.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of over 1000 primary adult OLTs at UCLA. Extended criteria (EC) considered included donor age (>55 years), donor hospital stay (>5 days), cold ischemia time (>10 hours), and warm ischemia time (>40 minutes). One point was assigned for each extended criterion. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1153 allografts considered in the study, 568 organs exhibited no extended criteria (0 score), while 429, 135 and 21 donor allografts exhibited an EC score of 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Overall 1-year patient survival rates were 88%, 82%, 77% and 48% for recipients with EC scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively (P < 0.001). Adjusting for recipient age and urgency at the time of transplantation, multivariate analysis identified an ascending mortality risk ratio of 1.4 and 1.8 compared to a score of 0 for an EC score of 1, and 2 (P < 0.01) respectively. In contrast, an EC score of 3 was associated with a mortality risk ratio of 4.5 (P < 0.001). Further, advanced recipient age linearly increased the death hazard ratio, while an urgent recipient status increased the risk ratio of death by 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended criteria donors can be scored using readily available parameters. Optimizing perioperative variables and matching ECD allografts to appropriately selected recipients are crucial to maintain acceptable outcomes and represent a preferable alternative to both high waiting list mortality and to a potentially futile transplant that utilizes an ECD for a critically ill recipient.

Domino liver transplantation in maple syrup urine disease

Liver transplantation has been reported in a few cases of maple syrup urine disease (MSUD), but is controversial. Many patients with approved indications for liver transplantation die before grafts are available. A 25-yr-old man with MSUD underwent liver transplantation, and his liver was used as a domino graft for a 53-yr-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma who had low priority on the liver transplant waiting list and was unlikely to survive until routine organ procurement. Both transplants were performed as "piggy back" procedures, reconstructing the domino graft with caval segments from the cadaveric donor. Neither required veno-venous bypass. Whole body leucine oxidation was estimated by 13CO2 in breath after oral boluses of L-[1-13C]-leucine, before and after transplantation in both patients and a control subject. The surgical outcome was successful. The patient with MSUD had marked decreases in plasma branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and alloisoleucine (from 255 +/- 66 to 16 +/- 7 micromol/L), despite advancement of dietary protein from 6 to >40 gm/day. The domino recipient maintained near-normal levels of plasma amino acids with no detectable alloisoleucine on unrestricted diet. Leucine oxidation increased in the patient with MSUD (from 2.2 to 5.6% recovered in 4 hours) and decreased in the recipient (from 9.7 to 6.2%). Neither patient demonstrated any apparent symptoms of MSUD over more than 7 months. In conclusion, liver transplantation substantially corrects whole body BCAA metabolism in MSUD and greatly attenuates the disease. Livers from patients with MSUD may be considered as domino grafts for patients who might otherwise not survive until transplantation.

Improved survival after live donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) using right lobe grafts: program experience and lessons learned

We present our program experience with 85 live donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) procedures using right lobe grafts with five simultaneous live donor kidney transplants using different donors performed over a 6-year period. After an "early" 2-year experience of 25 LDALT procedures, program improvements in donor and recipient selection, preoperative imaging, donor and recipient surgical technique and immunosuppressive management significantly reduced operative mortality (16% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.038) and improved patient and graft 1-year survival in recipients during our "later" experience with the next 60 cases (January 2001 and March 2005; patient survival: early 70.8% vs. later 92.7%, p = 0.028; graft survival: Early 64% vs. later 91.1%, p = 0.019, respectively). Overall patient and graft survival were 82% and 80%. There was a trend for less postoperative complications (major and minor) with program experience (early 88% vs. later 66.7%; p = 0.054) but overall morbidity remained at 73.8%. Biliary complications (cholangitis, disruption, leak or stricture) were not influenced by program experience (early 32% vs. later 38%). Liver volume adjusted to 100% of standard liver volume (SLV) within 1 month post-transplant. Despite a high rate of morbidity after LDALT, excellent patient and graft survival can be achieved with program experience.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis within the Eurotransplant area: an additional option with "livers that nobody wants"

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is recognized as the treatment of choice for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) in patients with end-stage liver failure. However, because of limited organ availability, not all those who qualify can benefit from it.

METHODS

Over a 3-year period, we accepted and subsequently transplanted 10 deceased donor liver allografts allocated through Eurotransplant. These organs had been officially offered to and rejected by other transplant centers a total of 40 times due to medical or logistical reasons prior to our acceptance. They were implanted into patients in the waiting list with HCC and cirrhosis. Recipients without HCC transplanted with such "undesirable" grafts were not included in this study.

RESULTS

Two patients had initial poor graft function but subsequently recovered. There was one arterial complication requiring reintervention. Median intensive care unit and hospital stays were 6 and 28 days respectively. One patient developed renal insufficiency, but recovered after 3 months. One patient developed HCC recurrence in the allograft and underwent a successful atypical liver resection 23 months after transplantation. All patients are currently alive, with follow-up periods ranging from 5 to 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation with such "livers that nobody wants" constitutes an additional option for patients with HCC and cirrhosis. The risk-benefit ratio in these instances should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Influence of cumulative number of marginal donor criteria on primary organ dysfunction in liver recipients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this cohort study was to assess the cumulative effect of marginal donor criteria on initial graft function and patient survival after liver transplantation.

METHODS

We included 734 consecutive patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation at the Vienna General Hospital between January 1993 and December 2003. We employed the local registry of the Department of Transplant Surgery, where variables of all patients are routinely and prospectively recorded. Primary outcome was initial graft function, secondary outcome was patient survival.

RESULTS

Cumulative number of marginal donor criteria was significantly and linearly associated with an increased rate of primary dysfunction (PDF; p = 0.005). In patients with more than three cumulative marginal donor criteria the rate of PDF was 36%. Patient survival was not influenced by the cumulative number of donor criteria (log-rank test, p = 0.81). Independent marginal donor criteria to predict PDF were cold ischemia time >10 h [odds ratio (OR) 0.56; 95% CI 0.32-0.98] and donor peak serum sodium >155 mEq/L (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.26-0.77), as assessed in a multivariate regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of marginal liver donors with more than three marginal donor criteria shows deleterious effects on initial graft function. Noteworthy, patient survival was not associated with marginal donor criteria, which may be explained by early and successful retransplantation of liver recipients with primary non-function.

Impact of MELD on short-term and long-term outcome following liver transplantation: a European perspective

INTRODUCTION

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been found to accurately predict pre-transplant mortality and is a valuable system for ranking patients in need of liver transplantation. Its association with post-transplant outcome, however, remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 121 adult patients who were transplanted for non-fulminant liver failure between January 1991 and December 2001. MELD scores were calculated taking variables as close as possible prior to liver transplantation. Patients were stratified into two or three groups using different cut-off values of the MELD score.

RESULTS

Indications for liver transplantation were mainly alcoholic liver disease (47.1%) or hepatitis C virus (19.0%). Gender distribution was male 62% vs female 38%. Mean age was 54 years+/-10 years. Mean MELD score was 16+/-6. Follow-up time was 5.4 years (range, 1.6-12.3 years). The use of different MELD cut-off levels yielded no difference in survival at different time points.

CONCLUSION

Higher MELD scores did not have a negative impact on patient and graft survival following OLT. Since MELD is good at identifying those urgently in need of liver transplantation and high MELD scores do not appear to have an influence on long-term outcome, use of MELD in liver allocation seems warranted.

Effects of 10 minutes of ischemic preconditioning of the cadaveric liver on the graft's preservation and function: the ying and the yang

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although extensively studied in animal models, ischemic preconditioning has not yet been studied in clinical transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of cadaveric liver transplantation with and without ischemic liver preconditioning in the donor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Alternate patients were transplanted with liver grafts that had (n = 46, GroupPrecond) or had not (n = 45, GroupControl) been subjected to ischemic preconditioning. Liver ischemia-reperfusion injury, liver and kidney function, morbidity, and in-hospital mortality rates were compared in the 2 groups. Initial poor function was defined as a minimal prothrombin time within 10 days of transplantation <30% of normal and/or bilirubin >200 micromol/L.

RESULTS

The postoperative peaks of ASAT (IU/L) and ALAT (IU/L) were significantly lower in GroupPrecond (556 +/- 968 and 461+/-495, respectively) than in the GroupControl (1073 +/- 1112 and 997+/-1071, respectively). The rate of technical morbidity and the incidence of acute rejection were similar in both groups. Initial poor function was significantly more frequent in the GroupPrecond (10 of 46 cases) than in the GroupControl (3 of 45 cases). Hospital mortality rates were similar in the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, body mass index of the donor, graft steatosis, and ischemic preconditioning were significantly predictive of the posttransplant peak of ASAT. In univariate analysis, only preconditioning was significantly associated with initial poor function.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard orthotopic liver transplant, ischemic preconditioning of the liver graft in the donor is associated with better tolerance to ischemia. However, this is at the price of decreased early function. Until further studies are available, the clinical value of preconditioning liver grafts remains uncertain.

Donor Characteristics Associated with Liver Graft Survival

BACKGROUND

Organ availability is affecting the development of liver transplantation in its entirety, leading to transplant teams expanding the criteria for accepting organ donors. In these circumstances, analysis of the impact of the donor's characteristics on graft survival becomes mandatory.

METHODS

Fifty-two donor variables from 5,150 liver transplants performed in Spain between 1994 and 2001 were analyzed through a univariate analysis. Those with statistically significant impact on graft survival were entered in a Cox regression model with the recipients' characteristics and other factors linked to the graft technique.

RESULTS

Several donor factors negatively affect graft survival: donor age, cause of death, body mass index, vasoactive drug administration, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, increased alkaline phosphatase and liver enzyme levels, low bicarbonate level, and antecedents of hypertension. However, only four can be mentioned as representing a risk for losing the graft when donor variables are controlled with recipient or technique variables in a Cox regression model: donor age, antecedents of hypertension, prolonged ICU stay, and low bicarbonate level. In the same analysis, norepinephrine administration has a relative risk less than 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The multivariate analysis of the impact of 52 donor characteristics on liver graft survival showed the negative effect of an elderly donor, with hypertension combined with the presence of metabolic acidosis, or a prolonged ICU donor stay. The administration of norepinephrine alone during donor management showed a protective effect.

Omega-3 fatty acids improve hepatic steatosis in a murine model: potential implications for the marginal steatotic liver donor

The presence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease often precludes potential organs from being used for transplantation. To date, there is no adequate treatment for hepatic steatosis, and it is expected that, because of increased obesity in Western society, the incidence of this disorder will increase. We investigated the effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on the treatment of hepatic steatosis in C57/Bl6 mice fed a high-carbohydrate, fat-free diet and in B6.V-Lep(ob) obese mice. Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reversed hepatic steatosis in C57/Bl6 mice fed a high-carbohydrate, fat-free diet and converted macrovesicular to microvesicular steatosis in B6.V-Lep(ob) obese mice as determined by histology, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and liver biochemistry We therefore conclude that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation improves hepatic steatosis in mice and may be used to increase the pool of potential live liver donors that are currently excluded because of the presence of macrovesicular steatosis.

The outcome of 400 consecutive liver grafts using the aortic perfusion-only technique

The goal of this study is to establish the effect of cadaveric liver retrieval, using the technique of aortic perfusion only, on liver graft function, and to identify associated potential risk factors for graft dysfunction. The authors reviewed the outcome of 400 consecutive, orthotopic, cadaveric liver transplantation retrieved by the technique of aortic perfusion only. Relevant parameters pertaining to the donor, recipient, procurement, graft and peri-operative variables are analyzed to assess their influence on graft function. The univariant analysis revealed that donor age, body mass index, blood pressure, and vasopressor dependence influence graft function. Furthermore, predictors of dysfunction included prolonged anhepatic phase, transplantation duration and partial grafts. In addition, multivariant analysis revealed significant association between obesity of donors, partial graft, and dysfunction. The technique of aortic perfusion only, is a simple and reproducible procedure. The post-transplantation outcomes appear to be similar to those reported for the traditional liver procurement technique.

Preharvest donor hyperoxia predicts good early graft function and longer graft survival after liver transplantation

A total of 44 donor/recipient perioperative and intraoperative variables were prospectively analyzed in 89 deceased-donor liver transplantations classified as initial good graft function (IGGF) or initial poor graft function (IPGF) according to a scoring system based on values obtained during the 1st 72 postoperative hours from the serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentration, bile output, and prothrombin activity. The IGGF compared with the IPGF group showed: 1) longer graft (P = .002) and patient (P = .0004) survival; 2) at univariate analysis, a higher (mean [95% confidence interval]) preharvest donor arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)) (152 [136-168] and 104 [91-118] mmHg, respectively; P = .0008) and arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation (97.9 [97.2-98.7] and 96.7 [95.4-98.0]%, respectively; P = .0096), a lower percentage of donors older than 65 years (13 and 33%, respectively; P = .024), a lower percentage of donors treated with noradrenaline (16 and 41%, respectively; P = .012). At multivariate analysis, IGGF was associated positively with donor PaO(2) and negatively with donor age greater than 65 years and with donor treatment with noradrenaline. Independently from the grouping according to initial graft function, graft survival was longer when donor PaO(2) was >150 mmHg than when donor PaO(2) was < or =150 mmHg (P = .045). In conclusion, preharvest donor hyperoxia predicts IGGF and longer graft survival.

Expanded criteria donor grafts for deceased donor liver transplantation under the MELD system: a decision analysis

Expanded criteria donor (ECD) liver grafts have a higher likelihood of primary graft failure (PGF) compared with standard criteria donor (SCD) grafts. Given a choice between an available ECD graft versus waiting for an SCD graft that may not always become available, what should liver transplant candidates do? The study's aim was to estimate 1-year survival comparing immediate ECD liver grafting with waiting for an SCD organ. Using UNOS data, published literature estimates, and expert opinion, we constructed a Markov decision analytic model to estimate survival while waiting for an SCD transplant and survival with immediate ECD transplant. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying model parameters individually and simultaneously with a second-order Monte Carlo simulation. For all patients with MELD scores >20, survival was higher with immediate ECD transplant despite the additional increased risk for PGF. Survival was better with an immediate ECD transplant unless the probability of PGF exceeded 23%, 72%, and 88% for recipients with MELD scores of 11-20, 21-25, and 26-30 respectively. For patients with MELD scores >30, the survival benefit with the immediate ECD strategy persisted at even higher rates of PGF. In conclusion, our results suggest that, despite the higher risk for PGF, transplantation with an available ECD graft should be preferred over waiting for an SCD organ for patients with advanced MELD scores. At less advanced MELD scores, the survival benefit depends on the risk of PGF associated with the ECD organ.

Liver transplantation using organs from donors older than 60 years

At present, it is frequently accepted to expand the organ pool for liver transplantation (LTx) by including livers from critical donors. From 1990 to June 2002 a total of 1,208 LTx were performed. Of those, 67 livers from donors older than 60 years were transplanted to 66 patients, including re-LTx in eight patients. Fourteen patients had malignant diseases (21%). Ten patients had a high urgency status (15%). Median donor age was 65 years (range 61-80 years). Primary graft function was observed in 84%. Patient survival rate at 1 and 5 years was 79% and 62%, and graft survival was 68% and 53%, respectively. No difference was observed in LTx with livers from donors younger than 60 years. Fifteen graft losses occurred during the study. Surgical complications were observed in 23 patients (34%). The outcome of LTx with livers from donors older than 60 years is satisfactory and is comparable to results of LTx with livers from donors younger than 60 years. The frequency of vascular complications and cholestasis syndrome is not increased.

Role of free radicals in failure of fatty liver grafts caused by ethanol

Alcohol is associated with accidental deaths and suicides leading to organ donation, and hepatic steatosis is an important risk factor for initial poor function and failure of human liver grafts. Mechanisms of fatty graft failure are not fully understood, but increased oxidative stress may be a major factor. To characterize the role of free radical stress and the efficacy of antioxidant treatments in fatty liver graft injury, donors for orthotopic rat liver transplantation were treated chronically (3 or more weeks) and acutely (single dose) with ethanol. After transplantation, necrosis and alanine aminotransferase release were threefold to fourfold higher in recipients of fatty grafts from donors treated with ethanol either acutely or chronically compared with findings for recipients of grafts from untreated donors. Moreover, graft survival decreased from nearly 100% to less than 20%. Free radical adducts, as measured by electron spin resonance spectroscopy, were detected in the blood and bile of rats receiving fatty grafts caused by ethanol. Markers of lipid peroxidation also increased after transplantation. Destruction of Kupffer cells with gadolinium chloride decreased free radical production and improved graft survival. Leukocyte adhesion increased beginning early after implantation, and adherent white blood cells obtained from transplanted fatty livers produced the same free radical species as were detected in blood. Therefore, Kupffer cells and adherent white blood cells are important sources of free radicals. Free radicals not only damage fatty grafts directly but also lead to enhanced inflammation and disturbed microcirculation. Delivery of superoxide dismutase-1 and superoxide dismutase-2 genes, free radical-scavenging polyphenols, and antioxidant-containing Carolina Rinse solution reduced injury and improved survival of fatty grafts caused by ethanol. Taken together, these findings indicate that free radicals increase in fatty grafts after transplantation and play an important role in injury of fatty grafts obtained from ethanol-exposed donors. Treatment of fatty donor livers with antioxidants and free radical scavengers may thus be an effective clinical therapy to prevent failure of fatty grafts.

Serum cholestasis markers as predictors of early outcome after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early cholestasis is not uncommon after liver transplantation and usually signifies graft dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine if serum synthetic and cholestatic parameters measured at various time points after transplantation can predict early patient outcome, and graft function.

METHODS

The charts of 92 patients who underwent 95 liver transplantations at Rabin Medical Center between 1991 and 2000 were reviewed. Findings on liver function tests and levels of serum bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) on days 2, 10, 30, and 90 after transplantation were measured in order to predict early (6 months) patient outcome (mortality and sepsis) and initial poor functioning graft. Pearson correlation, chi(2) test, and Student's t-test were performed for univariate analysis, and logistic regression for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis. Serum bilirubin >/=10 mg/dL and international normalized ratio (INR) >1.6 on days 10, 30, and 90, and high serum ALP and low albumin levels on days 30 and 90 were risk factors for 6-month mortality; serum bilirubin >/=10 mg/dL on days 10, 30, and 90, high serum ALP, high GGT, and low serum albumin, on days 30 and 90, and INR >/=1.6 on day 10 were risk factors for sepsis; high serum alanine aminotransferase, INR >1.6, and bilirubin >/=10 mg/dL on days 2 and 10 were risk factors for poor graft function. The 6-month mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with serum bilirubin >/=10 mg/dL on day 10 than in patients with values of <10 mg/dL (29.4% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.004). Patients who had sepsis had high mean serum ALP levels on day 30 than patients who did not (364.5 +/- 229.9 U/L vs. 70.8 +/- 125.6 U/L, p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis. Significant predictors of 6-month mortality were serum bilirubin >/=10 mg/dL [odds ratio (OR) 9.05, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.6-49.6] and INR >1.6 (OR 9.11, CI 1.5-54.8) on day 10; significant predictors were high serum ALP level on day 30 (OR 1.005, 1.001-1.01) and high GGT level on day 90 (OR 1.005, CI 1.001-1.01). None of the variables were able to predict initial poor graft functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Several serum cholestasis markers may serve as predictors of early outcome of liver transplantation. The strongest correlation was found between serum bilirubin >/=10 mg/dL on day 10 and early death, sepsis, and poor graft function. Early intervention in patients found to be at high risk may ameliorate the high morbidity and mortality associated with early cholestasis.

Polyphenols from Camellia sinenesis prevent primary graft failure after transplantation of ethanol-induced fatty livers from rats

Fatty liver caused by ethanol decreases survival after liver transplantation in rats. This study investigated if antioxidant polyphenols from Camellia sinenesis (green tea) prevent failure of fatty grafts from ethanol-treated rats. Donor rats were given ethanol intragastrically (6 g/kg). After 20 h, livers were explanted and stored in University of Wisconsin solution for 24 h. Prior to implantation, the explanted grafts were rinsed with lactated Ringer's solution containing 0 to 60 microg/ml polyphenols. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) release after liver transplantation was 4.5-fold higher in recipients receiving ethanol-induced fatty grafts than in those receiving normal grafts. Liver grafts from ethanol-treated donors also developed severe focal necrosis. Graft survival was 11% in the ethanol group versus 88% for normal grafts. Polyphenol treatment at 60 microg/ml blunted ALT release by 66%, decreased necrotic areas by 84%, and increased survival to 75%. Ethanol increased alpha-(4-pyridyl-1-oxide)-N-tert.-butylnitrone free radical adducts in bile by 2.5-fold, as measured by electron spin resonance spectroscopy, and caused accumulation of 4-hydroxynonenal in liver sections, effects blunted by polyphenols. Epicatechin gallate, a major polyphenol from C. sinenesis, also decreased enzyme release, minimized pathological changes, and decreased free radical adduct formation. In conclusion, polyphenols scavenged free radicals in ethanol-induced fatty livers and decreased injury after liver transplantation.

Prediction of 6-month survival after liver transplantation using Cox regression

BACKGROUND

The outcome of liver transplantation (LTx) has been correlated with several donor and recipient factors.

METHODS

A database of 191 consecutive LTx cases was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression statistics based on 80 variables. To avoid additional effects of late events on patient survival, the chosen endpoint was 6 months. Data were evaluated using SPSS statistical software.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a difference in 1- to 6-month graft survival between patients transplanted with organs from donors older versus younger than 60 years (Breslow, P <.01). Differences in 1- to 6-month graft survivals were observed between patients listed as UNOS status 3, 2B, 2A, and 1: the outcomes for UNOS status 2B versus UNOS status 2A and UNOS status 2B versus status 1 were significant (P <.05). Differences in 1- to 6-month graft survival rates were found between patients with versus without sepsis (P <.05), and with versus without rejection episodes (P <.01). Cox regression analysis revealed only three of the variables to be independent prognostic predictors of graft failure: donor age; postoperative septic status; and rejection. The best mathematical multivariate Cox regression model linked donor age + donor Na + rejection + sepsis to 1- to 6-month graft survival (chi-square = 29.06, P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Factors predictive of 1- to 6-month graft survival after liver transplantation include donor age; UNOS status; sepsis; and rejection.

Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function

BACKGROUND

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been found to accurately predict pretransplant mortality and is a valuable system for ranking patients in greatest need of liver transplantation. It is unknown whether a higher MELD score also predicts decreased posttransplant survival.

METHODS

We examined a cohort of patients from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for whom the critical pretransplant recipient values needed to calculate the MELD score were available (international normalized ratio of prothrombin time, total bilirubin, and creatinine). In these 2,565 patients, we analyzed whether the MELD score predicted graft and patient survival and length of posttransplant hospitalization.

RESULTS

In contrast with its ability to predict survival in patients with chronic liver disease awaiting liver transplant, the MELD score was found to be poor at predicting posttransplant outcome except for patients with the highest 20% of MELD scores. We developed a model with four variables not included in MELD that had greater ability to predict 3-month posttransplant patient survival, with a c-statistic of 0.65, compared with 0.54 for the pretransplant MELD score. These pretransplant variables were recipient age, mechanical ventilation, dialysis, and retransplantation. Recipients with any two of the three latter variables showed a markedly diminished posttransplant survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The MELD score is a relatively poor predictor of posttransplant outcome. In contrast, a model based on four pretransplant variables (recipient age, mechanical ventilation, dialysis, and retransplantation) had a better ability to predict outcome. Our results support the use of MELD for liver allocation and indicate that statistical modeling, such as reported in this article, can be used to identify futile cases in which expected outcome is too poor to justify transplantation.

Survival and complication rates in liver transplant patients showing primary dysfunction versus normofunction

AIMS

To determine rates of vascular and biliary duct complications, acute rejection, and graft and patient survival according to function status following liver transplantation.

METHODS

We classified 248 consecutive liver transplants performed at the Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, over a 79-month period according to initial function as primary function (NP) versus dysfunction (PD). The latter group was subdivided into grafts showing primary failure (PF) or inadequate function (IPF). The classes NP and IPF were distinguished according to whether transaminase (GOT or GPT) levels and prothrombin activity were above or below 2000 IU and 50%, respectively.

RESULTS

There were 23 (9.3%) patients with PD, of whom 12 (4.8%) showed PF. The incidence of vascular and biliary duct complications was similar in both groups, although acute rejection showed a significant difference (PD 3/23 versus NP 98/225; odds ratio =.18). In contrast, the mean survival rates of the grafts (NP 60.37 versus IPF 39.90 months) or patients (NP 63.02 versus PD 47.10 months) were not significantly different. Only 1- and 3-month graft survival rates significantly differed between the NP and IPF groups (NP 95% versus IPF 63%; P=.03 and NP 89% versus IPF 58%; P=.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients with PD or NP after liver transplant showed no differences in the incidence of vascular or biliary duct complications. These groups did vary, however, in terms of rates of acute rejection episodes. No differences in graft and patient survival rates were observed except a significantly lower graft survival at 1 and 3 months, among patients with inadequate primary function.

The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation

The shortage of organs has led centers to expand their criteria for the acceptance of marginal donors. The combination of multiple marginal factors seems to be additive on graft injury. In this review, the utility of various marginal donors in patients requiring liver transplantation will be described, including older donors, steatotic livers, non-heart-beating donors, donors with viral hepatitis, and donors with malignancies. The pathophysiology of the marginal donor will be discussed, along with strategies for minimizing the ischemia reperfusion injury experienced by these organs. Finally, new strategies for improving the function of the marginal/expanded donor liver will be reviewed.

Perceptions of the donation process from adult-to-adult living liver donors

BACKGROUND

Donor safety and the impact on quality of life continue to concern transplant centers as living liver transplantation increases.

METHODS

Living liver donors participated in a focus group to discuss their perceptions of the donation process.

RESULTS

The decision to donate was a personal choice made before the request by the recipient or transplant service. Spouses verified their support, but indicated that they were not included in the process. No donors felt coerced. The explanation of the procedure was thorough but excessive. Hospital care was good; however, donors admitted being unprepared for the pain and side effects of pain medications. Ongoing incisional discomfort continued beyond 6 weeks and prevented donors from feeling normal. Donors felt conflicted about competing with the "true" patient for healthcare.

CONCLUSIONS

Donors were positive about the need and willingness to donate. Sensitivity to the order of the disclosure process is identified.

Influence of ischemia and surgery times on development of primary dysfunction liver transplant in patients

OBJECTIVE

(1) To determine the incidences of primary failure and primary dysfunction of liver transplants performed at our center. (2) To evaluate the effects of mean cold and warm ischemia times as well as the length of five stages of surgery on the development of primary dysfunction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 248 liver transplants consecutively performed in 206 patients at the Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid over 79 months. Six cases were excluded because the patients died within 24 hours of transplant, it was therefore not possible to establish the postoperative liver function. Recipients were classified according to their posttransplant liver function as showing normal primary function (NP) or primary dysfunction (PD), which included patients with primary failure (PF) and inadequate primary function (IPF). The NP and IPF groups were defined in terms of transaminase levels and prothrombin activity from posttransplant days 2 to 7. The following factors were analyzed: graft cold (CIT) and warm (WIT) ischemia times; graft arterial (AIT) and venous (VIT) ischemia times; and times of surgery (ST), arterial anastomosis (AAT), and anhepatic phase (APT).

RESULTS

Twenty-three (9.3%) patients were classified as showing PD, 12 (4.8%) of whom suffered an episode of PF. The mean values (and standard deviations) of the times (in minutes) were ST = 308.19 +/- 109.78; CIT = 411.08 +/- 140.62; WIT = 46.51 +/- 37.70; AIT = 510.95 +/- 165.95; VIT = 458.68 +/- 151.98; AAT = 54.12 +/- 31.84; and APT = 58.53 +/- 90.07. No significant differences were detected in the mean times of patients showing NP or PD. Neither were any differences observed between the two patient groups according to the variables CIT longer than 10 hours and WIT longer than 60 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our times of surgery and cold ischemia are shorter than those reported by other transplant teams, mostly North American surgeons who quote figures of around 7 and 12 hours, respectively. These relatively low values may account for the lack of effect shown by the times of ischemia or surgery stages on the appearance of primary dysfunction in patients undergoing liver transplant.

Clinical experience gained from the use of 120 steatotic donor livers for orthotopic liver transplantation

Steatosis of the donor liver is known to impact on patient and allograft outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of increasing grades of cadaveric donor liver steatosis on recipient outcome. Between January, 1986 and December, 2000, 120 OLTs were performed with 72 mild, 25 moderate, and 23 severe steatotic donor livers. Donors of steatotic livers were more likely to be older (P =.001) and have died of intracerebral haemorrhage than donors of nonsteatotic livers. Initial poor graft function (IPF) was more common in donor livers with either moderate or severe steatosis than in donor livers with mild steatosis (P =.03). Primary graft nonfunction (PNF) occurred in only 1 donor liver with severe steatosis. PGE1 (PGE1) usage was higher in recipients of donor livers with moderate or severe steatosis versus donor livers with mild steatosis (P =.001). Allograft loss was greater at 1 year both in the moderate and severe (P =.03) steatotic liver groups. Patient survival at 3 months and overall allograft survival both were impacted negatively by increasing grades of donor liver steatosis (P =.02, P =.03). Three-month allograft survival was reduced in the steatotic donor livers if the donor was 50+ years old (P =.033). Recipient status at OLT (P =.001) and donor steatosis (P =.046) impacted on 30 day allograft survival (multivariate analysis). In conclusion, increasing grades of donor liver steatosis were associated with worse IPF and increased PGE1 usage. There was a negative impact of steatosis on both recipient and early allograft survival.

Evaluation of potential liver donors: limits imposed by donor variables in liver transplantation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of different donor and recipient parameters that have been recognised previously as proven and to suggest prognostic factors for immediate liver function and final outcome after liver transplantation. We evaluated a total of 228 liver grafts transplanted in the last 3 years in our institution. Parameters were recorded for the donor (age, polytransfusion, atherosclerosis, presence of infection, episodes of hypoxia or hypotension, use of vasoactive drugs, intensive care unit stay, steatosis, and ischemia time) and recipient (red blood cell requirements, immediate liver function [score], incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis, survival, and cause of death or retransplantation). Liver biopsy after reperfusion of the donor liver was performed before closure of the abdomen. Donor age over 65 years and presence of steatosis were associated significantly with initial poor function. The mortality rate at 6 months was related to donor age over 65 years. When donor age over 65 years was combined with transfusion requirement of > 10 U of red blood cells (RBC), the incidence of graft loss increased to 53%. The probability of graft survival at two years decreased when donor age was over 65 years. Moreover, when donor age over 65 years was combined with requirement of > 10 units RBC the probability of 2-year survival was significantly reduced. This study shows, for the first time, that the use of donor livers from older donors in liver transplant procedures, requiring more than 10 U of RBC, results in a significantly worse prognosis in terms of immediate liver function and long-term survival.

Operative parameters that predict the outcomes of hepatic transplantation

BACKGROUND

A growing discrepancy between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation and the number of organs available mandates the use of even marginal organ donors in whom there is major risk of suboptimal graft function. A comprehensive analysis of operative parameters on the outcomes of liver transplantation has not been reported.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed the impact of 24 operative variables on the survival of 942 consecutive primary liver allografts performed at a single center from June 1992 through December 1997. Univariate and Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify those variables with independent prognostic significance in graft survival. Resource utilization for variables with multivariate significance was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 12 intraoperative variables found to have significance in univariate analysis, three were significant by Cox multivariate analysis: 1) lack of immediate bile production by the graft intraoperatively, 2) platelet transfusion > or = 20 U, and 3) recipient urine output < or =2.0 mL/kg/h intraoperatively. Each of the three variables was associated with marked increases in hospital and Intensive Care Unit length of stay and hospital charges accrued during the admission for transplantation.

CONCLUSION

We identified three operative parameters that predict a poor outcome after liver transplantation. The presence of these indicators suggests that early retransplantation should be considered. Early identification of grafts likely to have poor function might also provide an opportunity for therapeutic intervention to salvage graft function.

A simple technique for aortic cannulation in organ donors with advanced aortic disease

Cannulation of the abdominal aorta in organ donors with advanced arteriosclerotic disease or extensive trauma may be problematic owing to difficulty in securing a watertight tie around the diseased aorta, the danger of creating a false passageway in the aorta, and the risk of breaking off plaque particles that can advance into the arteries of donated organs. Cannulation problems can be avoided in these challenging donors by using a simplified technique for cannulation of the thoracic aorta in which a Foley catheter is passed down around the aortic arch, the balloon is inflated, and cool flushing is initiated.

Split liver transplantation and risk to the adult recipient: analysis using matched pairs

BACKGROUND

The technique of liver splitting is an effective way of increasing the donor pool and reducing pediatric waiting list mortality. But the procedure is still not fully accepted because of concerns that it may cause complications in adult recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-nine adult recipients of primary extended right split liver transplantations (SLTs) were matched to recipients of whole liver transplantations (WLTs) according to the following criteria: 1) United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, 2) donor age, 3) recipient age, 4) total cold ischemic time, 5) indication for liver transplantation, 6) Child-Pugh class, and 7) year of transplantation. A WLT-recipient match was identified in 40 adult recipients of primary SLT.

RESULTS

Fifteen percent of the recipients in our study were highly urgent cases (UNOS 1), and 85% were UNOS status 3-4. The 3- and 12-month patient survival rates after SLT and WLT were 82.5% and 77.1%, and 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively (log rank p = 0.358). The 3- and 12-month graft survival rates showed no significant difference in either group (80% and 74% in SLT and 87.5% and 77.4% in WLT [log rank p = 0.887]). The rates of primary nonfunction, primary poor function, biliary and vascular complications, intra- and postoperative blood transfusion, and intensive care stay were comparable for SLT and WLT.

CONCLUSIONS

SLT, using the extended right hepatic lobe, does not notably differ from WLT with regard to initial graft function, postoperative complications, or patient and graft survival. Based on this, the liver can be considered a paired organ, and mandatory splitting of good-quality livers can be recommended.

Pretransplant model to predict posttransplant survival in liver transplant patients

OBJECTIVE

To develop a prognostic model that determines patient survival outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) using readily available pretransplant variables.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The current liver organ allocation system strongly favors organ distribution to critically ill recipients who exhibit poor survival outcomes following OLT. A severely limited organ resource, increasing waiting list deaths, and rising numbers of critically ill recipients mandate an organ allocation system that balances disease severity with survival outcomes. Such goals can be realized only through the development of prognostic models that predict survival following OLT.

METHODS

Variables that may affect patient survival following OLT were analyzed in hepatitis C (HCV) recipients at the authors' center, since HCV is the most common indication for OLT. The resulting patient survival model was examined and refined in HCV and non-HCV patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Kaplan-Meier methods, univariate comparisons, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were employed for analyses.

RESULTS

Variables identified by multivariate analysis as independent predictors for patient survival following primary transplantation of adult HCV recipients in the last 10 years at the authors' center were entered into a prognostic survival model to predict patient survival. Accordingly, mortality was predicted by 0.0293 (recipient age) + 1.085 (log10 recipient creatinine) + 0.289 (donor female gender) + 0.675 urgent UNOS - 1.612 (log10 recipient creatinine times urgent UNOS). The above variables, in addition to donor age, total bilirubin, prothrombin time (PT), retransplantation, and warm and cold ischemia times, were applied to the UNOS database. Of the 46,942 patients transplanted over the last 10 years, 25,772 patients had complete data sets. An eight-factor model that accurately predicted survival was derived. Accordingly, the mortality index posttransplantation = 0.0084 donor age + 0.019 recipient age + 0.816 log creatinine + 0.0044 warm ischemia (in minutes) + 0.659 (if second transplant) + 0.10 log bilirubin + 0.0087 PT + 0.01 cold ischemia (in hours). Thus, this model is applicable to first or second liver transplants. Patient survival rates based on model-predicted risk scores for death and observed posttransplant survival rates were similar. Additionally, the model accurately predicted survival outcomes for HCV and non-HCV patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant patient survival can be accurately predicted based on eight straightforward factors. The balanced application of a model for liver transplant survival estimate, in addition to disease severity, as estimated by the model for end-stage liver disease, would markedly improve survival outcomes and maximize patients' benefits following OLT.

Pretransplant model to predict posttransplant survival in liver transplant patients

OBJECTIVE

To develop a prognostic model that determines patient survival outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) using readily available pretransplant variables.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The current liver organ allocation system strongly favors organ distribution to critically ill recipients who exhibit poor survival outcomes following OLT. A severely limited organ resource, increasing waiting list deaths, and rising numbers of critically ill recipients mandate an organ allocation system that balances disease severity with survival outcomes. Such goals can be realized only through the development of prognostic models that predict survival following OLT.

METHODS

Variables that may affect patient survival following OLT were analyzed in hepatitis C (HCV) recipients at the authors' center, since HCV is the most common indication for OLT. The resulting patient survival model was examined and refined in HCV and non-HCV patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Kaplan-Meier methods, univariate comparisons, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were employed for analyses.

RESULTS

Variables identified by multivariate analysis as independent predictors for patient survival following primary transplantation of adult HCV recipients in the last 10 years at the authors' center were entered into a prognostic survival model to predict patient survival. Accordingly, mortality was predicted by 0.0293 (recipient age) + 1.085 (log10 recipient creatinine) + 0.289 (donor female gender) + 0.675 urgent UNOS - 1.612 (log10 recipient creatinine times urgent UNOS). The above variables, in addition to donor age, total bilirubin, prothrombin time (PT), retransplantation, and warm and cold ischemia times, were applied to the UNOS database. Of the 46,942 patients transplanted over the last 10 years, 25,772 patients had complete data sets. An eight-factor model that accurately predicted survival was derived. Accordingly, the mortality index posttransplantation = 0.0084 donor age + 0.019 recipient age + 0.816 log creatinine + 0.0044 warm ischemia (in minutes) + 0.659 (if second transplant) + 0.10 log bilirubin + 0.0087 PT + 0.01 cold ischemia (in hours). Thus, this model is applicable to first or second liver transplants. Patient survival rates based on model-predicted risk scores for death and observed posttransplant survival rates were similar. Additionally, the model accurately predicted survival outcomes for HCV and non-HCV patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant patient survival can be accurately predicted based on eight straightforward factors. The balanced application of a model for liver transplant survival estimate, in addition to disease severity, as estimated by the model for end-stage liver disease, would markedly improve survival outcomes and maximize patients' benefits following OLT.

Influence of marginal donors on liver preservation injury

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the accumulated effects of marginal donor quality factors on liver preservation injury (LPI).

METHODS

The most recent 400 consecutive liver transplantations at our institution were reviewed. Marginal liver donor criteria included the following: older than 60 years, an intensive care unit stay under ventilatory support for more than 4 days, a cold ischemia time more than 14 hr, high inotropic drug use, prolonged hypotensive episodes for more than 1 hr and less than 60 mm Hg, a peak serum sodium more than 155 mEq/L, and high levels of bilirubin, alanine transferase, or amino transferase. The type of steatosis (macrovesicular or microvesicular) was quantified in four categories: no steatosis, mild (<30%), moderate (30-60%), and severe (> 60%). LPI was stratified histologically in four levels: no damage, mild, moderate, and severe injury. These variables were included in a logistic regression analysis for prediction of the probability of the appearance of LPI.

RESULTS

Five variables showed an independent influence on LPI: high inotropic drug use (odds ratio [OR]=1.56), donor age (OR=1.017 per year), moderate to severe macrovesicular steatosis (OR=3.63), cold ischemia time (OR=1,109 per hour), and prolonged stay in an intensive care unit (OR=1.79). Severe LPI was present in 32.7% of the grafts from donors without any factor of the model; in 46.8% from donors with one factor (P =0.09); in 66.2% from donors with two factors (P =0.006); and in 78.3% from donors with at last three factors (P =0.002) (global P=0.0001; chi2 =21.8).

CONCLUSIONS

LPI can be potentially predicted based on donor and graft conditions. Accumulation of factors is correlated with an increased effect on LPI.

Organ donation in Hawaii: impact of the final rule

BACKGROUND

In an effort to increase organ donation, the Department of Health and Human Services issued the Final Rule in 1998. The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) later required hospitals to notify organ procurement organizations (OPO) of all deaths and imminent deaths in order to remain eligible for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement. We set out to determine the impact of the Final Rule on organ donation in Hawaii.

METHODS

Medical records of all deaths between January 1999 and December 2000 at 17 acute-care hospitals were reviewed to determine the number of medically suitable, potential organ donors.

RESULTS

Of 9427 deaths, 144 were potential organ donors. In 1999, before the Final Rule, 60 of 75 (80%) potential donors were identified and 40 (53%) were referred to the OPO. In 2000, after the Final Rule, the identification rate was 83% and the referral rate was 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although, the Final Rule increased the referral rate slightly, medical centres must continue to improve their identification of potential donors and prompt referral. This is not only to comply with the Final Rule, but ultimately to increase organ donation to meet the needs of the ever-expanding list of patients waiting for organs.

Liver transplantation: making the best out of what we have

Since the first human liver transplantation, carried out in 1963, the procedure has become routine with an excellent outcome in terms of both quality and length of survival. One of the major challenges facing the transplant community is the shortage of donor organs. Possible approaches to overcoming this problem include changes in legislation, setting up of organizational structures, more effective use of marginal donor livers, splitting livers, and the development of living related transplants. Alternative treatments to liver transplantation have been sought, including hepatocyte transplantation, xenotransplantation, liver-directed gene therapy, extracorporeal liver support systems, tissue-engineered organs, and auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation.

Hepatic steatosis and its relationship to transplantation

Fatty infiltration of the liver is common in the brain-dead donor population and has a strong correlation with primary nonfunction after cold preservation, a condition that is catastrophic to liver transplant recipients. This literature review examines factors associated with the development, diagnosis, quantification, and clinical management of this difficult condition.