Serial casting as a delay tactic in the treatment of moderate-to-severe early-onset scoliosis

Surgical and Health-related Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Growing Rod "Graduates" With Severe versus Moderate Early-onset Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter database.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare surgical and quality-of-life outcomes at the end of growing rod treatment in patients with severe versus moderate early-onset scoliosis (EOS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Knowledge of the outcomes of severe EOS after growth-friendly treatment is limited because this condition is uncommon.

METHODS

We identified 40 children with severe EOS (major curve ≥90°) treated with growing rods before age 10 with minimum 2-year follow-up after last lengthening or final fusion. From the same registry, we matched 40 patients with moderate EOS (major curve < 90°). Twenty-seven patients in the severe group and 12 in the moderate group underwent final fusion (P < 0.001).

RESULTS

Mean preoperative curves were 102° (range, 90°-139°) in the severe group and 63° (range, 33°-88°) in the moderate group (P < 0.001). At final follow-up, mean curves were 56° (range, 10°-91°) and 36° (range, 12°-89°), respectively (P < 0.001). Fourteen (35%) children in the severe group and 32 (80%) in the moderate group had scoliosis of < 45° at final follow-up [risk ratio (RR), 0.44; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.20-0.57]. At final follow-up, 30 (75%) children in the severe group and 35 (88%) in the moderate group had achieved T1-T12 length of ≥18 cm (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.09). Thirty-five children in the severe group and 26 in the moderate group had at least one complication (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.73). Mean 24-Item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire scores were similar between groups at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Delaying surgery until the major curve has progressed beyond 90° is associated with larger residual deformity and more complications than treating at a lesser curve magnitude. Quality-of-life outcomes were similar between those with severe and moderate EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Impact of presenting patient characteristics on surgical complications and morbidity in early onset scoliosis

This study sought to assess comorbidity profiles unique to early-onset-scoliosis (EOS) patients by employing cluster analytics and to determine the influence of isolated comorbidity clusters on perioperative complications, morbidity and mortality using a high powered administrative database. The KID database was queried for ICD-9 codes pertaining to congenital and idiopathic scoliosis from 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012. Patients <10 y/o (EOS group) were included. Demographics, incidence and comorbidity profiles were assessed. Comorbidity profiles were stratified by body systems (neurological, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, renal). K-means cluster and descriptive analyses elucidated incidence and comorbidity relationships between frequently co-occurring comorbidities. Binary logistic regression models determined predictors of perioperative complication development, mortality, and extended length-of-stay (≥75th percentile). 25,747 patients were included (Age: 4.34, Female: 52.1%, CCI: 0.64). Incidence was 8.9 per 100,000 annual discharges. 55.2% presented with pulmonary comorbidities, 48.7% musculoskeletal, 43.8% neurological, 18.6% cardiovascular, and 11.9% renal; 38% had concurrent neurological and pulmonary. Top inter-bodysystem clusters: Pulmonary disease (17.2%) with epilepsy (17.8%), pulmonary failure (12.2%), restrictive lung disease (10.5%), or microcephaly and quadriplegia (2.1%). Musculoskeletal comorbidities (48.7%) with renal and cardiovascular comorbidities (8.2%, OR: 7.9 [6.6-9.4], p < 0.001). Top intra-bodysystem clusters: Epilepsy (11.7%) with quadriplegia (25.8%) or microcephaly (20.5%). Regression analysis determined neurological and pulmonary clusters to have a higher odds of perioperative complication development (OR: 1.28 [1.19-1.37], p < 0.001) and mortality (OR: 2.05 [1.65-2.54], p < 0.001). Musculoskeletal with cardiovascular and renal anomalies had higher odds of mortality (OR: 1.72 [1.28-2.29], p < 0.001) and extLOS (OR: 2.83 [2.48-3.22], p < 0.001). EOS patients with musculoskeletal conditions were 7.9x more likely to have concurrent cardiovascular and renal anomalies. Clustered neurologic and pulmonary anomalies increased mortality risk by as much as 105%. These relationships may benefit pre-operative risk assessment for concurrent anomalies and adverse outcomes. Level of Evidence: III - Retrospective Prognostic Study.

Experience with definitive instrumented final fusion after posterior-based distraction lengthening in patients with early-onset spinal deformity: single center results

Limited reports exist with regard to clinical and radiographic details of patients with early-onset spinal deformity (EOSD) undergoing definitive instrumented final fusion (FF) following implantation of a growing construct. Charts and radiographs were queried for all patients who underwent FF after management of EOSD with a distraction-based posterior construct at a single institution from 2006 to 2017. Patients managed during the growth modulation period with either proximal rib or spinal fixation were included. Thirteen patients qualified for inclusion. Spinal deformity etiologies were varied (neuromuscular: 5, idiopathic: 4, congenital: 4). Average age at implantation was 6.5 years, and patients underwent an average of 8.15 lengthening procedures over an average of 69 months. After the growing program, modest correction in main coronal Cobb was obtained at FF (average 52.4° before FF, 37.6° following FF, P<0.001; average percent improvement of 27%). Five patients required posterior column osteotomies. Using criteria proposed by Flynn and colleagues, 'minimal' coronal correction was achieved in 23% of patients and 'moderate' in 77%. No patient achieved 'substantial' (>50%) correction. Subjective poor bone quality was appreciated in 67% of patients, and 85% were noted to have areas of autofusion over previously spanned levels. Two (15%) patients sustained a total of four complications. After growth modulation procedures, EOSD deformities are generally stiff, bone quality is often subjectively poor, and autofusion is common, even after use of proximally rib-based systems. Modestly improved coronal Cobb correction can be obtained at FF but may require single or multiple posterior osteotomies. Intraoperative difficulties can be expected, and clinicians should be alert for intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Survey to describe variability in early onset scoliosis cast practices

PURPOSE

To investigate paediatric orthopaedists' cast practices for early onset scoliosis regarding patient selection, cast application, radiographic evaluation, treatment cessation and adjunctive bracing.

METHODS

A casting survey was distributed to all paediatric orthopaedists in Children's Spine and Growing Spine Study Groups (n = 92). Questions included physician and patient characteristics, technique, treatment, outcomes, radiographic measurements and comparison to other treatments. A total of 55 orthopaedists (60%) responded, and descriptive statistics were calculated on the subset who cast (n = 45).

RESULTS

A majority of respondents use cast treatment for idiopathic and syndromic scoliosis patients, but not for neuromuscular or congenital scoliosis patients. Major curve angle ranked most important in orthopaedists' decision to commence cast treatment, in comparison with rib-vertebra angle difference or clinical observations. The major curve angle threshold to initiate casting was a median of 30° (20° to 70°), and the minimum patient age was median ten months (3 to 24). First in-cast and out-of-cast radiographs are taken standing, supine, awake, under anesthesia and/or in traction. In all, 58% consistently cast over or under the arm, while 44% vary position by patient. Respondents were divided about the use of a brace after cast treatment: 22% do not prescribe a brace, 31% always do and 36% do in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Future multicentre research studies must standardize radiographic practices and consider age and major curve angle at cast initiation and termination, scoliosis aetiology, shoulder position and treatment duration. Practices need to be aligned or compared in these areas in order to distinguish what makes for the best cast treatment possible.Level of Evidence: V, Expert opinion.

Results of Casting in Severe Curves in Infantile Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Previous work has demonstrated best results for casting in infantile scoliosis when the curves are small and the child begins casting under 2 years of age. This study examines if casting can delay the need for growth friendly instrumentation in severe curves (50 to 106 degrees) and how the comorbidities of syrinx or genetic syndromes affected outcomes.

METHODS

All children undergoing casting for scoliosis at a single institution over an 8-year period were examined. Inclusion criteria included initial curve at first casting of ≥50 degrees, age ≤3 years at the start of casting, and a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Of 148 children undergoing casting during this period, 44 met our inclusion criteria. All children underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Ten children with a syrinx were identified. Ten children had known genetic syndromes (2 who also had a syrinx). The 26 children without these comorbidities were considered idiopathic. Curve magnitude ranged from 50 to 106 degrees.

RESULTS

Nine of the 26 (35%) children in the children with idiopathic curves demonstrated resolution of their curves, while only 3 of the remaining 18 (17%) did. Of the children that did not have resolution of their curves, 14 were maintained over the entire follow-up period to within 15 degrees of their initial curve and 13 were improved 15 degrees or more. Only 5 children had an increase of 15 degrees or more over the follow-up period and 4 of these have undergone growth friendly instrumentation after a mean delay from initial cast of 71 months (range, 18 to 100 mo).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that even in severe curves, casting was effective in delaying instrumentation in all cases, and led to curve resolution of the curves in 12 of 44 children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-case control study.

2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth

BACKGROUND

The International Scientific Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) produced its first guidelines in 2005 and renewed them in 2011. Recently published high-quality clinical trials on the effect of conservative treatment approaches (braces and exercises) for idiopathic scoliosis prompted us to update the last guidelines' version. The objective was to align the guidelines with the new scientific evidence to assure faster knowledge transfer into clinical practice of conservative treatment for idiopathic scoliosis (CTIS).

METHODS

Physicians, researchers and allied health practitioners working in the area of CTIS were involved in the development of the 2016 guidelines. Multiple literature reviews reviewing the evidence on CTIS (assessment, bracing, physiotherapy, physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE) and other CTIS) were conducted. Documents, recommendations and practical approach flow charts were developed using a Delphi procedure. The process was completed with the Consensus Session held during the first combined SOSORT/IRSSD Meeting held in Banff, Canada, in May 2016.

RESULTS

The contents of the new 2016 guidelines include the following: background on idiopathic scoliosis, description of CTIS approaches for various populations with flow-charts for clinical practice, as well as literature reviews and recommendations on assessment, bracing, PSSE and other CTIS. The present guidelines include a total of 68 recommendations divided into following topics: bracing (n = 25), PSSE to prevent scoliosis progression during growth (n = 12), PSSE during brace treatment and surgical therapy (n = 6), other conservative treatments (n = 2), respiratory function and exercises (n = 3), general sport activities (n = 6); and assessment (n = 14). According to the agreed strength and level of evidence rating scale, there were 2 recommendations on bracing and 1 recommendation on PSSE that reached level of recommendation "I" and level of evidence "II". Three recommendations reached strength of recommendation A based on the level of evidence I (2 for bracing and one for assessment); 39 recommendations reached strength of recommendation B (20 for bracing, 13 for PSSE, and 6 for assessment).The number of paper for each level of evidence for each treatment is shown in Table 8.

CONCLUSION

The 2016 SOSORT guidelines were developed based on the current evidence on CTIS. Over the last 5 years, high-quality evidence has started to emerge, particularly in the areas of efficacy of bracing (one large multicentre trial) and PSSE (three single-centre randomized controlled trials). Several grade A recommendations were presented. Despite the growing high-quality evidence, the heterogeneity of the study protocols limits generalizability of the recommendations. There is a need for standardization of research methods of conservative treatment effectiveness, as recognized by SOSORT and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) non-operative management Committee.

Initial Cast Correction as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome Success for Infantile Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Cast treatment for infantile idiopathic scoliosis patients ultimately corrects deformity in varying amounts. As the reasons for these differential outcomes are not fully elucidated, the aim of this study was to identify clinical and radiographic variables correlated with better cast correction.

METHODS

Patients in the Children's Spine Study Group and Growing Spine Study Group registries who underwent cast treatment for idiopathic scoliosis between 2005 and 2013 with 1-year minimum follow-up were included. Data including major curve and rib-vertebra angle difference before cast, initial in-cast application, after cast treatment, and at most recent follow-up were collected. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with lower major curves at most recent follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were identified and followed for a mean of 2.5 (range, 1.1 to 5.4) years after cast treatment. Cast treatment lasted an average of 16.7 months, with a median of 6 cast applications (range, 2 to 19). Twenty-five subjects (37%) had a most recent major curve <15 degrees (success), whereas 43 had a curve that was >15 degrees (unresolved). Multivariable linear regression determined that younger age (P=0.02), smaller precast major curve (P<0.001), and greater percent major curve correction in initial cast (P=0.006) were associated with smaller major curve at most recent follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression determined that success patients were younger than unresolved patients (average age, 1.4 vs. 2.1 y; P=0.003), and had smaller in-cast major curves after initial cast application (average, 18 vs. 27 degrees; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Infantile idiopathic scoliosis patients casted at an earlier age, with smaller major curves, and greater percent major curve correction in initial cast have the best prognosis. Patients' percent major curve correction, which may represent curve flexibility and/or cast quality, is a predictor of treatment success when age and precast major curve are also taken into account.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective study.

Three-dimensional True Spine Length: A Novel Technique for Assessing the Outcomes of Scoliosis Surgery

BACKGROUND

Current assessment of spine growth for patients undergoing growth friendly surgical treatment for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is the use of serial, 1-dimensional standard-of-care coronal vertical spine height (SoCVH) measurements. Any growth of the spine out of the coronal plane is missed by the SoCVH, which may underestimate the actual growth of the spine. This study set to validate the novel 3-dimensional true spine length (3DTSL) radiographic measurement technique for measuring growth of EOS patients.

METHODS

3DTSL measurement accuracy, reliability, and repeatability was assessed using 10 physical model configurations. In addition, interrater and intrarater reliabilities (IRRs) were assessed using interclass coefficient (ICC) analyses of 23 retrospective EOS patient clinical radiographs. 3DTSL measurements were compared with SoCVH measurements.

RESULTS

The model assessment showed excellent accuracy with a mean error of 1.2 mm (SD=0.9; range, 0.0 to 3.0) and mean ICC of 0.999.IRR ICCs of the clinical radiographs averaged 0.952 for the 3DTSL and 0.975 for the vertical height whereas IRRs averaged 0.944 and 0.965, respectively (all P<0.001).Mean clinical 3DTSL curve lengths were 193.9 mm (SD=30.0; range, 142.8 to 276.8), whereas the SoCVH averaged 156.1 mm (SD=29.7; range, 74.7 to 207.3). The mean difference between the matched 3DTSL and SoCVH measurements was 37.8 mm (SD=21.4; range, 1.3 to 95.4) and was statistically significant (P<0.0001). On average, the 3DTSL of the measured spines was 124.2% of the measured SoCVH, with a progressive difference as the Cobb or kyphosis angles increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel 3DTSL measurement is accurate, repeatable, and complements the current growth assessments for EOS treatments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-diagnostic study-development of a diagnostic criteria on basis of consecutive patients, with gold standard.

VEPTR Implantation to Treat Children With Early-Onset Scoliosis Without Rib Abnormalities: Early Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Thoracoplasty and insertion of vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) for thoracic and spine distraction has been found to be effective in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) with ribs anomalies and congenital vertebral anomalies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of VEPTR in preventing further progression of scoliosis without impeding spinal growth in children with progressive EOS without rib abnormalities.

METHODS

This is a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study. Erect radiographs were analyzed for coronal and sagittal curve and height measurements at preimplant, immediate postoperative, and at 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients met inclusion: 35 males and 28 females. Mean age at time of implantation was 6.1±2.4 years. Etiologies included congenital (n=6), neuromuscular (n=36), syndromic (n=4), and idiopathic (n=17). The mean follow-up was 2.2±0.4 years. Scoliosis (72±18 degrees) decreased after implant surgery (47±17 degrees) followed by slight increase at 2-year follow-up (57±18 degrees), P<0.0001. Kyphosis (48±22 degrees) also showed significant decrease after implantation (40±14 degrees), but increased after 2 years (48±16 degrees), P<0.0001. Coronal spine height measurements including T1-T12 (15.7±3 cm) and T1-S1 (25±6 cm) showed significant increases after implantation surgery (17.7±4 cm and 28.6±6 cm, respectively) and at 2 years (18.4±4 cm and 29.1±5 cm, respectively), P<0.0001. The increase in coronal spine height represented 144% of expected age-matched T1-T12 growth and 193% of expected age-matched T1-S1 growth. Similarly, sagittal spine length of T1-T12 and T1-S1 increased from 16.9±2.7 cm and 27.1±3.9 cm, respectively preoperatively to 19.7±3.5 cm and 31.9±5.1 cm, respectively at 2-year follow-up, P<0.0001. The instrumented spine segment continued growth from 25.8±5.2 cm after implantation to 27.4±5.3 cm at 2-year follow-up, P<0.0001. Thirty-one patients (49%) had at least 1 complication with total of 58 complications.

CONCLUSIONS

At 2-year follow-up, VEPTR was effective in treating EOS without rib abnormalities with 86% of patients having an improvement in scoliosis and 94% of patients having an increased spinal height as compared with preoperative values. This study proved that spine continues to grow after VEPTR instrumentation during the distraction phase. This amount of growth represents about 40% for T1-T12 and 31% for T1-S1 spine of the expected age-matched growth based on Dimeglio reference numbers. We find this growth important as it proves continuous spine growth with VEPTR treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Serial Casting for Infantile Idiopathic Scoliosis: Radiographic Outcomes and Factors Associated With Response to Treatment

BACKGROUND

Serial casting for early-onset scoliosis has been shown to improve curve deformity. Our goal was to define clinical and radiographic features that determine response to treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with idiopathic infantile scoliosis with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: progressive idiopathic infantile scoliosis and initial casting before 6 years of age. Two groups were analyzed and compared: group 1 (≥10-degree improvement in Cobb angle from baseline) and group 2 (no improvement).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with an average Cobb angle of 48 degrees (range, 24 to 72 degrees) underwent initial casting at an average age of 2.1 years (range, 0.7 to 5.4 y). Average follow-up was 3.5 years (range, 2 to 6.9 y). Sex, age at initial casting, magnitude of spinal deformity, and curve flexibility (defined as change in Cobb angle from pretreatment to first in-cast radiograph) were not significantly different between groups (P>0.05). Group 1 had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) than group 2 at the onset of treatment (17.6 vs. 14.8, P<0.05). Univariate analysis of demographic, radiographic, and treatment factors revealed that only BMI was predictive of Cobb improvement (P=0.04; odds ratio=2.38). Group 1 (n=15) had a significantly lower Cobb angle (21 vs. 56 degrees) and rib vertebral angle difference (13 vs. 25 degrees) compared with group 2 at latest follow-up (P<0.05). A significantly larger proportion of children who were casted at less than 1.8 years of age had a Cobb angle <20 degrees at latest follow-up (P=0.03). Group 2 maintained stable clinical and radiograph parameters from pretreatment to most recent follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

To maintain a homogeneous cohort, we excluded patients with syndromes and developmental delays. We believe that analyzing a homogeneous group provides more meaningful results than if we studied a heterogeneous sample. BMI was significantly associated with outcome such that for each unit increase in BMI, there is a 2.38× increase in the chance of improvement. Curve flexibility was similar between groups, which suggest that the amount of correction obtained at initial casting does not confirm treatment success. Key aspects of treatment that may determine success include age of less than 1.8 years at initiation of casting and derotation of the spine to correct rib vertebral angle difference of <20 degrees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-Therapeutic.

Current Concepts - Congenital Scoliosis

Background:

Congenital scoliosis is one of the ‘difficult to treat’ scenarios which a spine surgeon has to face. Multiple factors including the age of child at presentation, no definite pattern of deformity and associated anomalies hinder the execution of the ideal treatment plan. All patients of congenital scoliosis need to be investigated in detail. X rays and MRI of spine is usually ordered first. Screening investigations to rule out VACTERL (Visceral, Anorectal, Cardiac, Tracheo-esophageal fistula, Renal and Lung) abnormalities are required. They are cardiac echocardiography and ultrasonography of abdomen and pelvis. CT scan is required to understand the complex deformity and is helpful in surgical planning.

Methods:

A comprehensive medical literature review was done to understand the current surgical and non surgical treatment options available. An attempt was made to specifically study limitations and advantages of each procedure.

Results:

The treatment of congenital scoliosis differs with respect to the age of presentation. In adults with curves more than 50 degrees or spinal imbalance the preferred treatment is osteotomy and correction. In children the goals are different and treatment strategy has to be varied according to the age of patient. A single or two level hemivertebra can easily be treated with hemivertebra excision and short segment fusion. However, more than 3 levels or multiple fused ribs and chest wall abnormalities require a guided growth procedure to prevent thoracic insufficiency syndrome. The goal of management in childhood is to allow guided spine growth till the child reaches 10 - 12 years of age, when a definitive fusion can be done. The current research needs to be directed more at the prevention and understanding the etiology of the disease. Till that time, diagnosing the disease early and treating it before the sequels set in, is of paramount importance.

Conclusion:

The primary aim of treatment of congenital scoliosis is to allow the expansion of chest and abdominal cavity, while keeping the deformity under control. Various methods can be categorized into definitive (hemivertebrectomy) or preventive (guided growth). Casting, Growth rods, Convex Epiphysiodesis are all guided growth measures. The guided growth procedure either ‘corrects the deformity’ or will have to be converted to a final fusion surgery once the child completes the spinal growth which is preferably done around 10 - 12 years of age. Future directions should aim at genetic counselling and early detection.

The therapeutic characteristics of serial casting on congenital scoliosis: a comparison with non-congenital cases from a single-center experience

Background

The therapeutic efficacy of serial casting on idiopathic scoliosis has been gradually documented. However, literatures on serial casting for congenital scoliosis (CS) remain extremely rare. This paper aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of serial casting between CS and non-CS patients to comprehensively evaluate the therapeutic characteristics of serial casting on CS patients.

Methods

A total of 23 early-onset scoliosis cases were included and divided into congenital scoliosis (CS, n = 8) and non-congenital group (non-CS, n = 15). Therapeutic outcomes including the major curve Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lodosis angle, and thoracic spine growing rate were compared between groups at precast, after the first cast, and at the latest follow-up, respectively.

Results

All patients received the first cast at the age of 3.25 ± 1.20 years and 5.70 ± 1.18 times of cast corrections. The average casting time was 17.17 ± 3.38 months, and the mean follow-up time was 23.91 ± 12.28 months. Both CS and non-CS groups had significant decrease in Cobb angle after the first cast and at the latest follow-up (all P < 0.05). Cobb angle was significantly lower in non-CS group than in CS group at both time points (all P < 0.01). The correction rate of Cobb angle was significantly higher in non-CS group than in CS group (around 50 vs. 20%, both P < 0.01). The mean thoracic growth rate was significantly lower in CS group than in non-CS group (0.72 ± 0.20 vs. 1.42 ± 0.22 cm/year, P < 0.001). At the latest follow-up, there are 2 cases receiving growing rod surgery, 8 cases wearing a brace, and 13 cases continuing serial casting.

Conclusions

Although the therapeutic efficacy of casting on CS patients is not as good as that on non-CS patients, casting is still an efficient treatment option for CS patients to delay the need for initial surgery.

Rib-based Distraction Surgery Maintains Total Spine Growth

BACKGROUND

For children undergoing treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) using spine-based distraction, recently published research would suggest that total spine length (T1-S1) achieved after the initial lengthening procedure decreases with each subsequent lengthening. Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of rib-based distraction on spine growth in children with EOS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multi-center review of 35 patients treated with rib-based distraction (minimum 5 y follow-up). Radiographs were analyzed at initial implantation and just before each subsequent lengthening. The primary outcome was T1-S1 height, which was also analyzed as: Change in T1-S1 height per lengthening procedure, percent of expected age-based T1-S1 growth per lengthening time interval, percent increase in T1-S1 height as compared with postimplantation total spine height, and percent of expected T1-S1 growth based upon patient age at time of lengthening procedure.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with a mean age of 2.6 years at initial surgery were studied. Diagnoses included congenital (n=18), syndromic (n=7), idiopathic (n=5), and neuromuscular (n=5). Major Cobb angle was 63.5 degrees and kyphosis was 40.5 degree. Four postoperative time periods were compared: L1 (preoperative first lengthening surgery), L2-L5 (preoperative second lengthening to preoperative fifth lengthening), L6-L10 (preoperative sixth lengthening to preoperative 10th lengthening), L11-L15 (preoperative 11th lengthening to preoperative 15th lengthening). Cobb angle stayed relatively constant for each lengthening period while maximum kyphosis increased. Total spine height was 19.9 cm pre-implantation, 22.1 cm postimplantation, and 28.0 cm by the 15th lengthening (P<0.05). Percent expected T1-S1 growth per lengthening was 62% for L2-L5, 95% for L6-L10, and 52% for L11-L15. As compared with postimplantation spine height, over the course of 15 lengthening procedures, a further 27% increase in spine height was observed. When lengthening procedures were performed when children were under age 5 years, 82% of expected growth was observed; between ages 6 and 10 years, 76% of expected growth was observed; and beyond age 10 years, 14% of expected growth was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with rib-based distraction surgery had an increase in total spine height from 20 cm preimplantation to 28 cm by the 15th lengthening. They maintained greater than 75% of expected age-matched spine growth until age 10 years and lengthening procedures did not appear to follow a law of diminishing returns. Rib-based distraction is an effective means of maintaining spine growth which is likely beneficial for pulmonary development as compared with the natural history of EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-Therapeutic study, case series.

A brief history and review of modern casting techniques in early onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

Body casts have a long history in the treatment of spinal deformity. Currently the use of body casts is limited to early onset scoliosis. Here, we aim to provide a brief narrative of the evolution of cast application for the management of spinal deformity.

METHODS

A history of cast application is provided with a brief review of the orthopedic literature. The current indications for cast application and the authors' preferred technique are described.

RESULTS

Serial casting is an effective treatment method for early onset scoliosis. It may be definitive for most idiopathic curves or used to delay surgical intervention in more severe idiopathic, syndromic and even congenital curves.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons who treat children with early onset scoliosis should familiarize themselves with serial cast application techniques.

Sagittal Spine Length Measurement: A Novel Technique to Assess Growth of the Spine

STUDY DESIGN

The accuracy and repeatability of a novel sagittal spine length (SSL) radiographic measurement was examined using photographic and radiographic imaging.

OBJECTIVES

To validate the new SSL technique for measuring growth in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Current assessment of patient growth undergoing growth-friendly surgical treatment for EOS is the use of serial vertical spine height measurements (VH) on coronal radiographs. Spine-based distraction implants are able to control the coronal plane deformity of scoliosis, but exhibit a "law of diminishing returns" in the impact of each follow-up lengthening surgery. As these treatments are kyphogenic, we hypothesize that the increase in kyphosis is, in fact, growth out of plane, not captured by standard spine height measurements.

METHODS

Measurement accuracy was assessed using 6 spine model alignments and clinical radiographs of 23 retrospective EOS patients. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were assessed using interclass coefficient (ICC) analyses. The discrepancy between the VH and SSL was also investigated.

RESULTS

The model assessment showed excellent accuracy, with a 1.54 mm (SD: 1.07, range: 0.03-3.14, p = .226) mean error and mean ICCs of 0.999. As the kyphosis increased, a progressive difference between the phantom VH and SSL was observed. Interrater reliability ICCs of the clinical radiographs averaged 0.981 and 0.804, whereas intrarater reliabilities averaged 0.966 and 0.826, for the coronal and sagittal radiographs, respectively. Mean clinical SSLs were 177.5 mm (SD: 28.5, range: 114.3-250.3), whereas the VH averaged 161.6 mm (SD: 31.8, range: 58.5-243.0), resulting in a 16.0-mm (SD: 16.7, range: 0.3-90.3, p < .0001) difference between the two measurements with a progressive difference as the kyphosis increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel SSL measurement is accurate, repeatable, and complements the current growth assessments for EOS treatments. Until sagittal spine lengths are taken into consideration, the "law of diminishing returns" should be interpreted with caution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II - Prospective Comparative Study.

Case-Matched Comparison of Spinal Fusion Versus Growing Rods for Progressive Idiopathic Scoliosis in Skeletally Immature Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter study of retrospectively and prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes of spinal fusion (SF) versus growing rod (GR) surgery using a case-matched series.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Scoliosis surgeons face two distinct treatment options for progressive idiopathic scoliosis in skeletally immature patients: definitive SF or growth-friendly surgery such as GR. No previous studies have directly compared outcomes between these two techniques.

METHODS

A multicenter database identified 11 GR patients who met the following criteria: (1) idiopathic etiology; (2) 9 years to 11 years old at initial surgery; (3) major thoracic curve; (4) had "final" SF. A second multicenter database was used to identify SF patient matches. A one-to-one patient match was performed based on age, major curve size, and curve apex.

RESULTS

Preoperative age was 10.1 years for GR and 10.8 years for SF (P = 0.003). GR had a mean 2.8 lengthenings before final fusion. Follow-up time after spinal fusion (3.8 vs. 4.5 years; P = 0.51) and age at latest follow-up (16.4 vs. 15.3 years; P = 0.28) were similar between GR and SF groups. Initial curve correction was significantly greater for SF compared with GR after initial GR surgery (71% vs. 38%; P < 0.001). SF patients had better overall curve correction at latest follow-up (63% vs. 44%; P = 0.08). Overall increase in T1-S1 was 23% for GR and 19% for SF (P = 0.42). Overall increase in T1-T12 was 19% for GR and 17% for SF (P = 0.76). Complications requiring unplanned surgery occurred in one GR patient and two SF patients. Number of surgeries was significantly higher in GR (54) compared with SF (13).

CONCLUSION

SF patients had greater curve correction and marginally less spinal and thoracic height gain compared with GR patients. GR patients underwent significantly more surgical procedures. These findings suggest GR treatment does not benefit older patients with juvenile idiopathic scoliosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Serial elongation-derotation-flexion casting for children with early-onset scoliosis

Various early-onset spinal deformities, particularly infantile and juvenile scoliosis (JS), still pose challenges to pediatric orthopedic surgeons. The ideal treatment of these deformities has yet to emerge, as both clinicians and surgeons still face multiple challenges including preservation of thoracic motion, spine and cage, and protection of cardiac and lung growth and function. Elongation-derotation-flexion (EDF) casting is a technique that uses a custom-made thoracolumbar cast based on a three-dimensional correction concept. EDF can control progression of the deformity and - in some cases-coax the initially-curved spine to grow straighter by acting simultaneously in the frontal, sagittal and coronal planes. Here we provide a comprehensive review of how infantile and JS can affect normal spine and thorax and how serial EDF casting can be used to manage these spinal deformities. A fresh review of the literature helps fully understand the principles of the serial EDF casting technique and the effectiveness of conservative treatment in patients with early-onset spinal deformities, particularly infantile and juvenile scolisois.

[Treatment of early onset scoliosis : How far can we go?]

BACKGROUND

Recently, inconsistent definitions of early onset scoliosis (EOS) and a wide variety of treatment options have been observed.

OBJECTIVES

To clearly define the term EOS, to depict non-operative and operative treatment options, and to present the limitations of the boundaries of these techniques.

METHODS

Review of the literature, including conference presentations and expert opinions, in addition to personal experiences.

RESULTS

Early onset scoliosis (EOS) refers to spine deformity that is present before 10 years of age, regardless of etiology. All existing operative treatment options share a high risk of complications. Therefore, non-operative treatment should act as a time-buying approach to postpone surgery.

DISCUSSION

Awareness of treatment options and their specific indications, in addition to respecting each patient's individual needs and feasibilities, are crucial for the optimal outcome.

Nonsurgical Management of Early-onset Scoliosis

Early-onset scoliosis is potentially fatal if left untreated. Although surgical management with growing instrumentation may be necessary, this is not a panacea and is associated with high complication rates. Recent evidence has demonstrated that nonsurgical treatment can be an effective early management strategy in delaying or even precluding the need for surgery, especially surgery with growing instrumentation. The goal of both nonsurgical and surgical management is to control or correct the spinal curve to allow appropriate pulmonary development while delaying definitive fusion until an appropriate skeletal age. Although more commonly used to delay surgery, serial cast correction using the Cotrel and Morel elongation-derotation-flexion technique may result in complete correction in patients with infantile idiopathic scoliosis and smaller curve magnitudes.

SOSORT Award Winner 2015: a multicentre study comparing the SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SOSORT-SRS recommendations

BACKGROUND

Data comparing different braces for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are scant. The SRS criteria represent some guidelines for comparing results from different studies, but controlled studies are much more reliable. Recently, super-rigid braces have been introduced in clinical practice with the aim of replacing Risser and EDF casts. The aim of the present study is to compare the short-term radiographic results of two super-rigid braces, the ART and the SPORT (Sforzesco) brace.

METHODS

A group of consecutive patients with Cobb >40°, Risser 0-4, age >10 treated with the ART brace for 6 months were matched with a group of similar patients taken from a prospective database of patients treated with the Sforzesco brace. Patients were matched according to Cobb severity, pattern and localization of the curve. All patients had a full-time brace prescription (23-24 hours per day) and an indication to perform scoliosis-specific exercises and were assessed radiographically both immediately in the brace and after 6 months of treatment out of brace. Curves were analyzed according to the pattern and localization taking into consideration both the in-brace correction and the 6-month out-of-brace results.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

t-test, ANOVA, linear regression, alpha set at 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included in the ART brace group, and 26 in the Sforzesco brace group. At baseline, no differences were noted for gender (3 males for each group), age (14.1 ± 0.3 for ART vs 13.9 ± 0.3 for Sforzesco), ATR (11.8 ± 3.2 vs 11.5 ± 4.2 for thoracic curves and 7.8 ± 4.0 vs 7.1 ± 6.1 for lumbar/thoracolumbar), Cobb angle (44.8 ± 2 vs 45.5 ± 2 for thoracic; 43.8 ± 2 vs 46.0 ± 2 for lumbar/thoracolumbar) or Risser sign (median 2 for both groups). The in-brace correction was slightly better for the ART brace, but didn't reach statistical significance (24.3 ± 8.5 vs 28.0 ± 6.8 for thoracic; 23.7 ± 10.4 vs 29.9 ± 4.2 for lumbar/thoracolumbar). At 6 months, results were similar both for thoracic (34.4 ± 10.4 vs34.8 ± 6.8) and for lumbar/thoracolumbar (32.8 ± 10.8 vs 36.6 ± 5.2). Also, with regard to the pattern, results were similar for double major and for thoracic, while there were not enough data for single lumbar to make a comparison. No differences for ATR were found (7.8 ± 3.2 vs 8.6 ± 2.9 for thoracic; 4.3 ± 3.4 vs 4.3 ± 3.7 for lumbar/thoracolumbar).

CONCLUSION

These two super-rigid braces showed similar short-term results, despite the better in-brace correction for lumbar curves shown by the ART brace. According to our data, the asymmetric design showed results similar to the symmetric one. After these preliminary data, further studies are needed to check end growth results and the impact of compliance, rigidity of curve, exercise and assessing quality of life.

Serial Derotational Casting in Idiopathic and Non-Idiopathic Progressive Early-Onset Scoliosis

INTRODUCTION

Serial derotational casting has been used as a definitive treatment or as delaying strategy in progressive idiopathic (IS) and non-idiopathic (NIS) early-onset scoliosis (EOS).

METHODS

Retrospective chart and radiographic review of patients who underwent serial casting for progressive EOS between 2005 and 2012 at a single institution.

RESULTS

A total of 74 consecutive patients entered serial cast treatment. Twenty-eight were currently being casted, 30 completed cast treatment and were converted to thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO), 9 were treated surgically, 6 were lost to follow-up, and 1 had no further treatment. The researchers diagnosed IS in 41 patients; 33 had NIS. At presentation the IS group had an average Cobb angle (CA) of 49° and a rib vertebral angle difference (RVAD) of 37°. The NIS group had a CA of 51° (p = .69) and RVAD of 37° (p = .94). In patients currently being casted, 19 IS patients had a decreased CA, from 47° to 27°. The 9 NIS patients had a decreased CA, from 62° to 57° (p = .0002). Cobb angle improvement was significantly better in IS (p = .0005). In the TLSO group the 17 IS patients had a decreased average CA, from 46° to 18°, after serial casting and the 13 NIS patients decreased CA from 42° to 32°. Patients with IS had better improvement in CA than the NIS group (p < .001). At last follow-up, this was reduced to 11° in the IS group and maintained at 32° in the NIS. In the IS group, 5 of 41 patients were converted to growth constructs, and 4 of 26 in the NIS group. Casting initiated before age 2 years yielded better curve correction for IS (p < .01) compared with NIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Progressive idiopathic scoliosis patients had better curve correction with casting than NIS patients. Casting in IS patients before age 24 months yielded better curve correction. Patients who required surgery had a higher age and Cobb angle at presentation than those who transitioned to a TLSO. The surgical group was observed for a similar duration of time and there was no significant statistical difference. Although RVAD is a predictor of progression in infantile IS, it did not show a predictive value in the response to casting of either the IS or NIS groups.

Serial derotational casting in congenital scoliosis as a time-buying strategy

BACKGROUND

Serial casting is an effective treatment modality in early-onset idiopathic scoliosis; however, the role of this method in congenital scoliosis is not well studied.

METHODS

A total of 11 patients with progressive congenital scoliosis were treated with serial cast application. Age at initial cast application, magnitudes of the congenital, compensatory and sagittal deformities, coronal balance, T1 to T12 height, number of casts and time-in cast per patient, subsequent surgical interventions, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean age at the first cast application was 40 months, and the average number of cast changes was 6.2 per patient. There were no major complications. The average precasting curve magnitude was 70.7 degrees (range, 44 to 88 degrees) and was significantly reduced to 55.1 degrees (range, 16 to 78 degrees) at the latest follow-up (P=0.005). The average precasting compensatory curve was 55.8 degrees (range, 38 to 72 degrees) and was significantly reduced to 39.8 degrees (range, 23 to 62 degrees) at the latest follow-up (P=0.017). Average T1 to 12 height increased from 12.8 cm at post-first cast to a 14.6 cm at the latest follow-up (P=0.04). Average time in cast was 26.3 months (range, 13 to 49 mo). During the treatment period, none of the patients required surgery for curve progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial derotational casting is a safe and effective time-buying strategy to delay the surgical interventions in congenital deformities in the short-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Update on evaluation and treatment of scoliosis

Scoliosis is a spinal deformity that can be seen in children of all ages. It is most commonly seen as an adolescent idiopathic condition. Progressive scoliosis between 25° and 45° before skeletal and physiologic maturity can be treated with a brace, whereas progressive scoliosis greater than 50° should be treated surgically. For children younger than 10 years, it is important to not only prevent scoliosis from worsening but to also maintain the growth of the spine and chest wall through the use of growth-friendly surgical techniques. Spinal fusion and instrumentation surgery is generally reserved for adolescent patients.

Traditional Growing Rods Versus Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Case-Matched 2-Year Study

INTRODUCTION

Traditional growing rod (TGR) surgery is a treatment technique commonly used for progressive early-onset scoliosis. Studies have shown that repeated TGR lengthenings can significantly increase the risk of complications. Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) are currently available outside of the United States and early results have been promising. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of MCGR versus TGR for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis.

METHODS

Magnetically controlled growing rod patients were selected based on the following criteria: aged less than 10 years, major curve greater than 30°, thoracic height less than 22 cm, no previous spine surgery, and minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 17 MCGR patients met the inclusion criteria, 12 of whom had complete data available for analysis. Each MCGR patient was matched with a TGR patient by etiology, gender, single versus dual rods, preoperative age, and preoperative major curve.

RESULTS

Magnetically controlled growing rod patients had a mean age of 6.8 years and mean follow-up of 2.5 years. Mean follow-up was greater for TGR patients by 1.6 years. Major curve correction was similar between MCGR and TGR patients throughout treatment. The MCGR patients experienced an average of 8.1 mm/year increase in T1-S1 during the lengthening period, compared with 9.7 mm/year for TGR patients (p = .73). There was a mean increase in T1-T12 of 1.5 mm/year for MCGR patients and 2.3 mm/year for TGR patients (p = .83). The TGR patients had 73 open surgeries, 56 of which were lengthenings. The MCGR patients had 16 open surgeries and 137 noninvasive lengthenings. Three TGR patients underwent 5 unplanned revision surgeries whereas 3 MCGR patients underwent 4 unplanned revisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Major curve correction was similar between MCGR and TGR patients throughout treatment. Annual T1-S1 and T1-12 growth was also similar between groups. The MCGR patients had 57 fewer surgical procedures than TGR patients. Incidence of unplanned surgical revisions as a result of complications was similar between groups.

Focused Molding Using Adhesive Pads in Mehta Casting for Early-Onset Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical series.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of adhesive pads placed over the apex of scoliosis curves on curve correction 1) after the first cast and 2) after the final cast.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Early-onset scoliosis is often effectively managed by serial casting. Properly localizing the apex of the molds with the cast in place is challenging. The authors explored the effectiveness of a novel technique: incorporation of adhesive pads placed over the major curve apex before Mehta casting.

METHODS

The 27 patients who received body casts (2000-2013) were divided into 2 groups: those without and with apical adhesive pads (5-6 layers of pads placed on the major curve's apex during casting): non-pad (NP) group (n = 12) and pad (P) group (n = 15), respectively. Groups were compared regarding the percentage of Cobb angle change from the first cast and curve correction to a Cobb angle of <25° with Student t and chi-square tests (significance was p < .05).

RESULTS

The mean percentage of major first-cast curve correction was 39% ± 18% and 56% ± 17% in the NP and P groups, respectively. Of the 26 patients out of a cast, 11 (42%) had a Cobb angle of <25°: 3 (25%) and 8 (57%) in the NP and P groups, respectively. The mean differences between the 2 groups in percentage of major curve correction and this Cobb angle correction were significant: p = .023 and .005, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Adhesive pads placed over major curve(s) during Mehta casting were effective in increasing the amount of major curve correction from the first cast for idiopathic early-onset scoliosis and in decreasing curves to <25° at final follow-up.

Recent advances in the management of early onset scoliosis

As the undesired results of early spinal fusion have become apparent, "growth-friendly" management methods for early onset scoliosis have been increasing during recent years. Current literature supports the use of repeated corrective cast applications as the initial management for most early onset progressive spinal deformities as either definitive treatment or as a temporizing measure. If casting is not an option or the deformity cannot be controlled via casting, one of the growth-friendly instrumentation techniques is chosen. Growth-friendly surgical methods and implants have been evolving as understanding of the disease improves.

Effective nonoperative treatment in juvenile idiopathic scoliosis

Nonoperative management of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS) has been reported to be less effective than that of infantile idiopathic scoliosis. The goal of this study was to analyse the results of casting and/or bracing in JIS. Clinical data from seven patients with JIS, treated with casting followed by bracing (n=3) or by bracing alone (n=4), were retrospectively collected, and curve severity was measured before, during and after treatment. The median Cobb angle decreased from 37° to 25°. No patient needed surgery at a median follow-up of 4.6 years (3.4-9.1 years). Casting and/or bracing is effective for the management of JIS.

Assessment and treatment of children with cerebral palsy

Children with cerebral palsy are prone to development of musculoskeletal deformities. The underlying neurlogic insult may results in a loss of selective motor control, an increase in underlying muscle tone, and muscle imbalance, which can lead to abnormal deforming forces acting on the immature skeleton. The severely involved child is one who is at increased risk for developing progressive musculoskeletal deformities. Close surveillance and evaluation are key to addressing the underlying deformity and improving and maintaining overall function.

Nutritional improvement following growing rod surgery in children with early onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the nutritional status of children with early onset scoliosis (EOS) and to determine if treatment with growing rod instrumentation improves weight percentile.

METHODS

Data was retrospectively collected on 88 EOS patients treated with growing rods at six institutions. Mean age at surgery was 5.8 years, and mean Cobb angle was 75°. All patients were followed for at least 2 years (mean 4 years). Weights were converted to normative percentiles based on the patients' age and gender.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 47 % (41/88) of patients were <5 percentile for weight, thus failing to thrive. There was a significant increase in mean postoperative weight percentiles at latest follow-up (p = 0.004). 49 % of patients gained weight, with a mean of 18 percentile. A significant relationship exists between age at initial surgery and percentile weight gain (p < 0.005), with children <4 years old not demonstrating postoperative improvement. This relationship was not confounded by preoperative weight, preoperative Cobb angle, or years of follow-up (p > 0.05). Children with neuromuscular and syndromic diagnoses do not appear to improve their mean nutritional status after surgery when compared to patients with idiopathic or congenital/structural scoliosis (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Following growing rod treatment, there was significant improvement in nutritional status in approximately 50 % of patients, similar to that reported with VEPTR. Neuromuscular and syndromic patients did not experience nutritional improvement post-operatively. These findings support the theory that growing rods improve the clinical status of EOS patients, as nutritional improvement is one outcome of improved clinical status. The relationship between age at initial surgery and nutritional improvement is intriguing.

2014 Update on the 'growing spine surgery' for young children with scoliosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Spinal fusion procedures that are the mainstay of the treatment of progressive or severe curves in adolescents and adults are not suitable for most young children as there is a large magnitude of remaining growth. Early spinal fusion stunts the growth of the thorax and may interfere with the development of the lungs. Therefore, in children with early-onset scoliosis, 'growth friendly' instrumentation systems have been utilized to control the deformity while allowing the growth of the spine and the thoracic cage.

RECENT FINDINGS

The experience with growing rods has been increasing, along with expanding indications. Several self-lengthening instrumentation systems have been introduced aiming for guided spinal growth. There has been considerable progress in the clinical and laboratory studies using magnetically controlled growing rod constructs. Growing rods and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) systems provide deformity control while allowing for spinal growth along with a risk of spontaneous vertebral fusions. VEPTR may cause rib fusions as the implants overlie the thoracic cage and, therefore, the use in pure spinal deformities is controversial.

SUMMARY

There have been exciting recent advances concerning the treatment of spinal deformities in young children. Despite these advances, the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis remains far from optimal and more development is on the way.

[Early onset scoliosis. What are the options?]

The prognosis of children with progressive early onset scoliosis has improved considerably due to recent advances in surgical and non-surgical techniques and the understanding of the importance of preserving the thoracic space. Improvements in existing techniques and development of new methods have considerably improved the management of this condition. Derotational casting can be considered in children with documented progression of a <60° curve without previous surgical treatment. Both single and dual growing rods are effective, but the latter seem to offer better results. Hybrid constructs may be a better option in children who require a low-profile proximal anchor. The vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR(®)) appears to be beneficial for patients with congenital scoliosis and fused ribs, and thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome. Children with medical comorbidities who may not tolerate repeated lengthenings should be considered for Shilla or Luque Trolley technique. Growth modulation using shape memory alloy staples or other tethers seem promising for mild curves, although more research is required to define their precise indications.

Comparison of Growing Rod Instrumentation Versus Serial Cast Treatment for Early-Onset Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A comparison of 2 methods of early-onset scoliosis treatment using radiographic measures and complication rates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a delaying tactic (serial casting) has comparable efficacy to a surgical method (insertion of growing rod instrumentation [GRI]) in the initial phase of early-onset deformity management.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Serial casts are used in experienced centers to delay operative management of curves of surgical magnitude (greater than 50°) in children up to age 6 years.

METHODS

A total of 27 casted patients from 3 institutions were matched with 27 patients from a multicenter database according to age (within 6 months of each other), curve magnitude (within 10° of each other), and diagnosis. Outcomes were compared according to major curve magnitude, spine length (T1-S1), duration and number of treatment encounters, and complications.

RESULTS

There was no difference in age (5.5 years) or initial curve magnitude (65°) between groups, which reflects the accuracy of the matching process. Six pairs of patients had neuromuscular diagnoses, 11 had idiopathic deformities, and 10 had syndromic scoliosis. Growing rod instrumentation patients had smaller curves (45.9° vs. 64.9°; p = .002) at follow-up, but there was no difference in absolute spine length (GRI = 32.0 cm; cast = 30.6 cm; p = .26), even though GRI patients had been under treatment for a longer duration (4.5 vs. 2.4 years; p < .0001) and had undergone a mean of 5.5 lengthenings compared with 4.0 casts. Growing rod instrumentation patients had a 44% complication rate, compared with 1 cast complication. Of 27 casted patients, 15 eventually had operative treatment after a mean delay of 1.7 years after casting.

CONCLUSIONS

Cast treatment is a valuable delaying tactic for younger children with early-onset scoliosis. Spine deformity is adequately controlled, spine length is not compromised, and surgical complications associated with early GRI treatment are avoided.

Early onset scoliosis: current concepts and controversies

Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) may be associated with long-term pulmonary morbidity, which is not commonly seen in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Initial evaluation is based on determining any underlying etiology related to congenital or syndromic conditions. Assessing the impact of scoliosis on thoracic development may help guide treatment, which is often required at a young age in these children to prevent irreversible pulmonary insufficiency. Treatment is based on multiple factors but may include non-surgical strategies, such as casting or bracing, along with growth-sparing surgical procedures using growing rods or chest wall expansion. Definitive fusion is rarely indicated in young patients. This chapter will cover the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of children with EOS.