Allospecific CD154+ T cells associate with rejection risk after pediatric liver transplantation

Surface markers of lymphocyte activation and markers of cell proliferation

The individualization of immunosuppression is an approach for preventing rejection in the early phase after transplantation and for avoiding the long-term side effects of over immunosuppression. Pharmacodynamic markers, either specific or nonspecific, have been proposed as complementary tools to drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs. A key event in graft rejection is the activation and proliferation of the recipient's lymphocytes, particularly T cells. Activated T cells express surface receptors, such as CD25 (the IL-2 receptor) and CD71 (the transferrin receptor), or co-stimulatory molecules (CD26, CD27, CD28, CD30, CD154 or CD40L, and CD134). Both surface marker expression and cell proliferation are predominately assessed by flow cytometry. Protocols have been established and utilized for both in vitro and ex vivo investigations with either isolated lymphocytes or whole blood. This article reviews the current body of research regarding the use of lymphocyte proliferation and surface activation markers with an emphasis on T cells. Experimental and clinical results related to these markers, as well as methodological issues and open questions, are addressed.

Allospecific CD154+ T-cytotoxic memory cells identify recipients experiencing acute cellular rejection after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The novel, recently described allo (antigen)-specific CD154+T cells were evaluated for their association with acute cellular rejection (ACR) in 43 adult renal transplant recipients receiving steroid-free tacrolimus after alemtuzumab induction.

METHODS

Single blood samples corresponding to "for cause" allograft biopsies were assayed for CD154+naive or memory T-helper or T-cytotoxic cells in 16-hr mixed leukocyte reaction.

RESULTS

Intra- and interassay variation was less than 10% for a variety of conditions. In logistic regression, leave-one-out cross-validation, and receiver-operating characteristic analyses, the rejection-risk threshold of allospecific CD154+T-cytotoxic memory cells (TcMs) associated best with biopsy-proven ACR with a sensitivity/specificity of 88% in 32 of 43 subjects. Sensitivity/specificity of 100%/88% was replicated in blinded prediction in the remaining 11 subjects. Allospecific CD154+TcM correlated inversely with CTLA4+TcM (Spearman r=-0.358, P=0.029) and increased significantly with increasing histological severity of ACR (P=2.99E-05, Kruskall-Wallis).

CONCLUSIONS

The strong association between ACR and allospecific CD154+TcM may be useful in minimizing protocol biopsies among recipients at reduced rejection risk.

Increased expression of peripheral blood leukocyte genes implicate CD14+ tissue macrophages in cellular intestine allograft rejection

Recurrent rejection shortens graft survival after intestinal transplantation (ITx) in children, most of whom also experience early acute cellular rejection (rejectors). To elucidate mechanisms common to early and recurrent rejection, we used a test cohort of 20 recipients to test the hypothesis that candidate peripheral blood leukocyte genes that trigger rejection episodes would be evident late after ITx during quiescent periods in genome-wide gene expression analysis and would achieve quantitative real-time PCR replication pre-ITx (another quiescent period) and in the early post-ITx period during first rejection episodes. Eight genes were significantly up-regulated among rejectors in the late post-ITx and pre-ITx periods, compared with nonrejectors: TBX21, CCL5, GNLY, SLAMF7, TGFBR3, NKG7, SYNE1, and GK5. Only CCL5 was also up-regulated in the early post-ITx period. Among resting peripheral blood leukocyte subsets in randomly sampled nonrejectors, CD14(+) monocytes expressed the CCL5 protein maximally. Compared with nonrejectors, rejectors demonstrated higher counts of both circulating CCL5(+)CD14(+) monocytes and intragraft CD14(+) monocyte-derived macrophages in immunohistochemistry of postperfusion and early post-ITx biopsies from the test and an independent replication cohort. Donor-specific alloreactivity measured with CD154(+) T-cytotoxic memory cells correlated with the CCL5 gene and intragraft CD14(+) monocyte-derived macrophages at graft reperfusion and early post-ITx. CCL5 gene up-regulation and CD14(+) macrophages likely prime cellular ITx rejection. Infiltration of reperfused intestine allografts with CD14(+) macrophages may predict rejection events.

Lymphocyte activation markers may predict the presence of donor specific alloreactivity in pediatric living related liver transplant recipients

This is an observational study with the primary objective to measure donor-specific immune responses by pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients, using cell surface expression of lymphocyte activation markers and cytokine secretion in mixed lymphocyte reactions. The secondary objective was to demonstrate possible mechanism(s) involved in those who demonstrated donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. Study participants included 17 recipients, their respective parental donors, the non-donor parent, as well as unrelated third party individuals. Within the CD4(+) population, two distinct patterns of CD69 and CD71 expressions were observed: recipients who had a lower percentage of CD4(+)CD69(+) and CD4(+)CD71(+) cells after donor versus non-donor stimulation (therefore a donor/non-donor ratio <1); and recipients who had a higher percentage of CD4(+)CD69(+) and CD4(+)CD71(+) cells after donor versus non-donor stimulation (therefore a donor/non-donor ratio ≥1). Eight recipients had the above defined ratio of <1, with significantly decreased interferon-γ secretion after donor versus non-donor stimulation. CD4(+)CD25(hi.)CD127- regulatory T cells from these eight recipients suppressed donor and non-donor cell induced proliferation. Suppression of proliferation was partially abrogated by interleukin-2. In conclusion, CD69 and CD71 cell surface expression with interferon-γ secretion can be used to identify two distinct populations in pediatric LT recipients. Both active regulation and anergy underlie donor specific hyporesponsiveness.

Allospecific CD154+ B cells associate with intestine allograft rejection in children

BACKGROUND

As a significant determinant of T- and B-cell cooperation, CD154 has been used to identify allospecific T-cytotoxic memory cells (TcM) for rejection risk assessment with high sensitivity or specificity but not for alloreactive B-cells, especially among recipients predisposed to acute cellular and humoral rejection, that is, children with intestinal transplantation (ITx).

METHODS

Single blood samples from 32 pediatric ITx after lymphocyte depleting induction therapy were obtained within 30 days of protocol biopsies. Samples were assayed for allospecific CD154CD19 B cells and allospecific CD154 TcM in 16-hr live-cell mixed leukocyte reaction using multiparametric flow cytometry. Results were expressed as the immunoreactivity index (IR) or the ratio of donor- to third-party-induced CD154 B cells or TcM. The rejection threshold IR of B cells was determined by logistic regression, leave-one-out cross-validation, and receiver operating characteristic analyses.

RESULTS

Biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection was present in 15 subjects (rejectors) and absent in 17 (nonrejectors). In archived serum samples from 16 of 32 subjects donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) were assayed by Luminex bead array. DSA were absent in all 7 nonrejectors but present in 7 of 9 rejectors. The IR of allospecific CD154CD19 B cells more than or equal to 1.351 was associated with rejector status and was present in 13 of 15 rejectors (sensitivity 87%) and absent in 15 of 17 nonrejectors (specificity 88%). Excellent correlations were seen between CD154CD19 B cells and CD154 TcM (Spearman ρ=0.647, P=0.0001) but could not be tested independently for DSA, which was highly correlated with rejector status and with CD154 TcM.

CONCLUSIONS

Allospecific CD154CD19 B cells identify rejection-prone children with ITx and can likely substitute for T-cell alloreactivity in estimating rejection risk in this rare subject population.

Immunologic basis of graft rejection and tolerance following transplantation of liver or other solid organs

Transplantation of organs between genetically different individuals of the same species causes a T cell-mediated immune response that, if left unchecked, results in rejection and graft destruction. The potency of the alloimmune response is determined by the antigenic disparity that usually exists between donors and recipients and by intragraft expression of proinflammatory cytokines in the early period after transplantation. Studies in animal models have identified many molecules that, when targeted, inhibit T-cell activation. In addition, some of these studies have shown that certain immunologic interventions induce transplantation tolerance, a state in which the allograft is specifically accepted without the need for chronic immunosuppression. Tolerance is an important aspect of liver transplantation, because livers have a unique microenvironment that promotes tolerance rather than immunity. In contrast to the progress achieved in inducing tolerance in animal models, patients who receive transplanted organs still require nonspecific immunosuppressant drugs. The development of calcineurin inhibitors has reduced the acute rejection rate and improved short-term, but not long-term, graft survival. However, long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs leads to nephrotoxicity and metabolic disorders, as well as manifestations of overimmunosuppression such as opportunistic infections and cancers. The status of pharmacologic immunosuppression in the clinic is therefore not ideal. We review recently developed therapeutic strategies to promote tolerance to transplanted livers and other organs and diagnostic tools that might be used to identify patients most likely to accept or reject allografts.

Intestinal transplantation: current outcomes and opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights current outcomes in intestinal transplantation and summarizes advances that have recently occurred in five interrelated areas: progress in intestinal rehabilitation, immunologic and technical modifications, awareness of opportunities for improved allograft monitoring, and better assessment of long-term complications and morbidities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improved long-term management of patients with intestinal failure as well as improved outcomes with intestine transplant are changing the previously established paradigms of timing for referral. For those requiring transplant, use of monoclonal and polyclonal antibody induction protocols have been associated with improved outcomes. Experience at centers of excellence demonstrates 1 and 5 year patient survival rates of 93 and 78%, respectively with ongoing investigations focusing on lowering long-term causes of graft loss such as chronic rejection or morbidities such as renal dysfunction. Descriptions of tissue, proteomic and genomic technologies to complement traditional methodologies to monitor graft function are emerging.

SUMMARY

Optimal timing for referral of children with intestinal failure and improved medical and surgical therapies increase the opportunity for intestinal adaptation without the need for transplant. For those undergoing transplant, technical and immunologic modifications, developments in graft monitoring, and reduction of long-term morbidities are leading to improved outcomes.

Monitoring the operationally tolerant liver allograft recipient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A fundamental goal in transplantation is the establishment of allograft function without ongoing immunosuppression. Robust allograft tolerance has been established in experimental transplantation models, whereas clinical operational tolerance has been described most frequently following human liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical assessment of tolerance has been limited to laboratory evaluation of organ function. Additional tools include graft monitoring through biopsy and blood sampling for biomarker analysis. Current biomarkers under assessment in recent years include dendritic cell subsets, regulatory T cells, antidonor antibodies, and gene polymorphisms. Emerging microarray analysis that is being prospectively validated will also be reviewed. A further tool in the characterization of the tolerant patient will be the accurate enrollment of such patients into a multicenter registry that will prospectively follow the natural history of the patient withdrawn from immunosuppression and help facilitate the entry of interested patients to mechanistic and immune monitoring trials. The International Solid Organ Transplant Tolerance Registry (www.transplant-tolerance.org) will be briefly described.

SUMMARY

Effective biomarker characterization of the operationally tolerant liver allograft recipient would allow earlier, well tolerated, prospective drug withdrawal with the goal of extending the potential benefits of drug minimization to an increasing number of patients in a more predictable fashion.

Proliferative alloresponse of T-cytotoxic cells identifies rejection-prone children with steroid-free liver transplantation

Donor-induced and third-party-induced proliferation of T-helper and T-cytotoxic (Tc) cells and their naïve and memory subsets was evaluated simultaneously in single blood samples from 77 children who received steroid-free liver transplantation (LTx) after induction with rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin. Proliferation was measured by dilution of the intravital dye carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) in a 3- to 4-day mixed lymphocyte response coculture. The ratio of donor/third-party-induced proliferated (CFSE(low)) T-cells was reported as the immunoreactivity index (IR) for each subset. Rejectors were defined as those who experienced biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection within 60 days of the assay. IR > 1 signified increased risk of rejection, and IR < 1 implied decreased risk. Demographics for 32 rejectors and 45 nonrejectors were similar. Proliferated CFSE(low) T-cells and subsets were significantly higher among rejectors compared with nonrejectors. In 33 of 77 randomly selected children, logistic regression, leave-one-out cross-validation, and receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that the IR of Tc cells was best associated with biopsy-proven rejection (sensitivity > 75%, specificity > 88%). Sensitivity and specificity were replicated in the remaining 44 children who composed the validation cohort. IR of CFSE(low) Tc cells correlated significantly with IR of proinflammatory, allospecific CD154+ Tc cells (r = 0.664, P = 0.0005) and inversely with IR of allospecific, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4-positive Tc cells (r = -0.630, P = 0.007). In conclusion, proliferative alloresponses of Tc cells can identify rejection-prone children receiving LTx. Liver Transpl 15:978-985, 2009. (c) 2009 AASLD.

Current perspectives on pediatric intestinal transplantation

Irreversible intestinal failure in children is predominantly caused by surgical conditions such as volvulus, necrotizing enterocolitis, and gastroschisis. Functional intestinal failure from motility disorders such as intestinal pseudo-obstruction or enterocyte dysfunction with microvillus inclusion disease also may require intestine replacement. Approved indications for intestinal transplantation include liver dysfunction, loss of major venous access, frequent central line-related sepsis, and recurrent episodes of severe dehydration despite intravenous fluid management. Surgical options include transplantation of the isolated intestine, combined liver-intestine transplantation, or multivisceral transplantation of the stomach, duodenum, pancreas, and small bowel (with or without the liver). Immunosuppression for intestinal transplantation is based on tacrolimus therapy, often with induction immunosuppression using antilymphocyte antibodies (eg, antithymocyte antibody and alemtuzumab). Experience at centers of excellence demonstrates 1- and 5-year patient survival rates of 95% and 77%, respectively, with ongoing investigations focusing on lowering long-term causes of graft loss such as chronic rejection.