51
|
Bhardwaj A, Munagala M. Mixed Shock Complicating Cardiogenic Shock: A Corollary or a Ramification? Circ Heart Fail 2024; 17:e011902. [PMID: 38979615 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.124.011902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Anju Bhardwaj
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas/McGovern Medical School, Houston (A.B.)
| | - Mrudula Munagala
- Division of Cardiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, FL (M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Baldetti L, Gallone G, Filiberti G, Pescarmona L, Cesari A, Rizza V, Roagna E, Gurrieri D, Peveri B, Nocera L, Cianfanelli L, Marcelli G, De Lio G, Boretto P, Angelini F, Gramegna M, Pazzanese V, Sacchi S, Calvo F, Ajello S, De Ferrari GM, Frea S, Scandroglio AM. Mixed Shock Complicating Cardiogenic Shock: Frequency, Predictors, and Clinical Outcomes. Circ Heart Fail 2024; 17:e011404. [PMID: 38979611 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.123.011404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) are at risk of developing mixed shock (MS), characterized by distributive-inflammatory phenotype. However, no objective definition exists for this clinical entity. METHODS We assessed the frequency, predictors, and prognostic relevance of MS complicating CS, based on a newly proposed objective definition. MS complicating CS was defined as an objective shock state secondary to both an ongoing cardiogenic cause and a distributive-inflammatory phenotype arising at least 12 hours after the initial CS diagnosis, as substantiated by predefined longitudinal changes in hemodynamics, clinical, and laboratory parameters. RESULTS Among 213 consecutive patients admitted at 2 cardiac intensive care units with CS, 13 with inflammatory-distributive features at initial presentation were excluded, leading to a cohort of 200 patients hospitalized with pure CS (67±13 years, 96% Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions CS stage class C or higher). MS complicating CS occurred in 24.5% after 120 (29-216) hours from CS diagnosis. Lower systolic arterial pressure (P=0.043), hepatic injury (P=0.049), and suspected/definite infection (P=0.013) at CS diagnosis were independent predictors of MS development. In-hospital mortality (53.1% versus 27.8%; P=0.002) and hospital stay (21 [13-48] versus 17 [9-27] days; P=0.018) were higher in the MS cohort. At logistic multivariable analysis, MS diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 3.00 [95% CI, 1.39-6.63]; Padj=0.006), age (OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.10] years; Padj<0.001), admission systolic arterial pressure <100 mm Hg (OR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.19-4.98]; Padj=0.016), and admission serum creatinine (OR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.19-2.26]; Padj=0.003) conferred higher odds of in-hospital death, while early temporary mechanical circulatory support was associated with lower in-hospital death (OR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.17-0.75]; Padj=0.008). CONCLUSIONS MS complicating CS, objectively defined leveraging on longitudinal changes in distributive and inflammatory features, occurs in one-fourth of patients with CS, is predicted by markers of CS severity and inflammation at CS diagnosis, and portends higher hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Baldetti
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| | - Guglielmo Gallone
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy (G.G., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.D.L., P.B., F.A., G.M.D.F., S.F.)
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy (G.G., L.P., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.M.D.F.)
| | - Gaia Filiberti
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| | - Luca Pescarmona
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy (G.G., L.P., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.M.D.F.)
| | - Andrea Cesari
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| | - Vincenzo Rizza
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| | - Edoardo Roagna
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy (G.G., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.D.L., P.B., F.A., G.M.D.F., S.F.)
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy (G.G., L.P., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.M.D.F.)
| | - Davide Gurrieri
- Mathematics Department, Polytechnic University of Milan, Italy (D.G.)
| | - Beatrice Peveri
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| | - Lorenzo Nocera
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy (G.G., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.D.L., P.B., F.A., G.M.D.F., S.F.)
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy (G.G., L.P., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.M.D.F.)
| | - Lorenzo Cianfanelli
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| | - Gianluca Marcelli
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy (G.G., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.D.L., P.B., F.A., G.M.D.F., S.F.)
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy (G.G., L.P., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.M.D.F.)
| | - Giulia De Lio
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy (G.G., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.D.L., P.B., F.A., G.M.D.F., S.F.)
| | - Paolo Boretto
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy (G.G., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.D.L., P.B., F.A., G.M.D.F., S.F.)
| | - Filippo Angelini
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy (G.G., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.D.L., P.B., F.A., G.M.D.F., S.F.)
| | | | - Vittorio Pazzanese
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| | - Stefania Sacchi
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| | - Francesco Calvo
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| | - Silvia Ajello
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| | - Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy (G.G., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.D.L., P.B., F.A., G.M.D.F., S.F.)
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy (G.G., L.P., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.M.D.F.)
| | - Simone Frea
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy (G.G., E.R., L.N., G.M., G.D.L., P.B., F.A., G.M.D.F., S.F.)
| | - Anna Mara Scandroglio
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (L.B., G.F., A.C., V.R., B.P., L.C., M.G., V.P., S.S., F.C., S.A., A.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Masroor M, Ansari MI, Umair M, Taimoor L, Hassan M, Arif MS, Karim M, Abubaker J. Steroids and myocardial infarction: Investigating safety and short-term mortality in critical post-myocardial infarction patients. Am J Med Sci 2024; 368:40-47. [PMID: 38395147 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventionally, in the pre-percutaneous intervention era, free wall rupture is reported to be a major concern for using steroids in myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the use of steroids in critically ill post-MI patients in terms of hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality. METHODS We included patients admitted to CCU diagnosed with MI, undergone revascularization, critically ill, and requiring mechanical ventilator (MV) support. The hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality were independently compared between steroid and non-steroid cohorts and propensity-matched non-steroid cohorts. RESULTS A total of 312 patients were included, out of which steroids were used in 93 (29.8%) patients during their management. On periodic bedside echocardiography, no free wall rupture was documented in the steroid or non-steroid cohort. When compared steroids with a propensity-matched non-steroid cohort, MV duration >24 h was 66.7% vs. 59.1%; p = 0.288, major bleeding was 6.5% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.305, need for renal replacement therapy was 9.7% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.799, in-hospital mortality was 35.5% vs. 23.7%; p = 0.077, and 180-day mortality was 48.4% vs. 41.9%; p = 0.377, respectively. The hazard ratio was 1.22 [95% CI: 0.80 to 1.88] compared to the propensity-matched non-steroid cohort. The ejection fraction (%) was found to be the independent predictor of 180-day mortality with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.92 [95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98]. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, using steroids is safe in post-MI patients with no significant increase in short-term mortality risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madiha Masroor
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rafiqui (H.J.) Shaheed Road, Karachi 75510, Pakistan.
| | - Muhammad Imran Ansari
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rafiqui (H.J.) Shaheed Road, Karachi 75510, Pakistan
| | - Madiha Umair
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rafiqui (H.J.) Shaheed Road, Karachi 75510, Pakistan
| | - Lalarukh Taimoor
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rafiqui (H.J.) Shaheed Road, Karachi 75510, Pakistan
| | - Mujtaba Hassan
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rafiqui (H.J.) Shaheed Road, Karachi 75510, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Sohaib Arif
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rafiqui (H.J.) Shaheed Road, Karachi 75510, Pakistan
| | - Musa Karim
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rafiqui (H.J.) Shaheed Road, Karachi 75510, Pakistan
| | - Jawed Abubaker
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rafiqui (H.J.) Shaheed Road, Karachi 75510, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Gédéon T, Zolotarova T, Eisenberg MJ. The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock: a narrative review. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL OPEN 2024; 4:oeae051. [PMID: 38974874 PMCID: PMC11227219 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
Aims Cardiogenic shock (CS) develops in up to 10% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and carries a 50% risk of mortality. Despite the paucity of evidence regarding its benefits, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used in clinical practice in patients with AMI in CS (AMI-CS). This review aims to provide an in-depth description of the four available randomized controlled trials to date designed to evaluate the benefit of VA-ECMO in patients with AMI-CS. Methods and results The literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify the four relevant randomized control trials from years of inception to October 2023. Despite differences in patient selection, nuances in trial conduction, and variability in trial endpoints, all four trials (ECLS-SHOCK I, ECMO-CS, EUROSHOCK, and ECLS-SHOCK) failed to demonstrate a mortality benefit with the use of VA-ECMO in AMI-CS, with high rates of device-related complications. However, the outcome of these trials is nuanced by the limitations of each study that include small sample sizes, challenging patient selection, and high cross-over rates to the intervention group, and lack of use of left ventricular unloading strategies. Conclusion The presented literature of VA-ECMO in CS does not support its routine use in clinical practice. We have yet to identify which subset of patients would benefit most from this intervention. This review emphasizes the need for designing adequately powered trials to properly assess the role of VA-ECMO in AMI-CS, in order to build evidence for best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Gédéon
- Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Côte Ste-Catherine Road, Suite H-421.1, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Tetiana Zolotarova
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Côte Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Mark J Eisenberg
- Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Côte Ste-Catherine Road, Suite H-421.1, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Côte Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Suite D05-2212, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Ave, Montreal, QC H3A 1Y7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Ruka M, Schupp T, Weidner K, Egner-Walter S, Forner J, Mashayekhi K, Tajti P, Ayoub M, Akin M, Behnes M, Akin I, Rusnak J. Influence of tricuspid regurgitation on the prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock. Curr Med Res Opin 2024; 40:1083-1092. [PMID: 38720658 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2353908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with adverse prognosis in various patient populations. However, data regarding the prognostic impact in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is limited. The study investigates the prognostic impact of pre-existing TR in patients with CS. METHODS Consecutive patients with CS from 2019 to 2021 were included in a monocentric registry. Every patient's medical history, including echocardiographic data, was recorded. The influence of pre-existing TR on prognosis was investigated. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analyses based on TR severity were conducted. Statistical analyses comprised univariable t-test, Spearman's correlation, Kaplan-Meier analyses, as well as multivariable Cox proportional regression models. Analyses were stratified by the underlying cause of CS such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or the need for mechanical ventilation. RESULTS 105 patients with CS and pre-existing TR were included. In Kaplan Meier analyses, it could be demonstrated that patients with severe TR (TR III°) had the highest 30-day all-cause mortality compared to mild (TR I°) and moderate TR (TR II°) (44% vs. 52% vs. 77%; log rank p = .054). In the subgroup analyses of CS-patients without AMI, TR II°/TR III° showed a higher all-cause mortality after 30 days compared to TR I° (39% vs. 64%; log rank p = .027). In multivariable Cox regression TR II°/TR III° was associated with 30-day all-cause mortality in CS-patients without AMI (HR = 2.193; 95% CI 1.007-4.774; p = .048). No significant difference could be found in the AMI group. Furthermore, TR II°/III° was linked to an increased 30-day all-cause mortality in non-ventilated CS-patients (6% vs. 50%, log rank p = .015), which, however, could not be confirmed in multivariable Cox regression. CONCLUSION The occurrence of pre-existing TR II°/III° was independently related with 30-day all-cause mortality in CS-patients without AMI. However, no prognostic influence was observed in CS-patients with AMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marinela Ruka
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tobias Schupp
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Kathrin Weidner
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sascha Egner-Walter
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jan Forner
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Kambis Mashayekhi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Mediclin Heart Centre Lahr, Lahr, Germany
| | - Péter Tajti
- Gottsegen György National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Mohamed Ayoub
- Division of Cardiology and Angiology, Heart Center University of Bochum - Bad Oeynhausen, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Muharrem Akin
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Behnes
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ibrahim Akin
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jonas Rusnak
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Ten Berg S, Otterspoor L, Henriques JPS. Letter by ten Berg et al Regarding Article, "Early Serial Assessment of Aggregate Vasoactive Support and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry". Circ Heart Fail 2024; 17:e011970. [PMID: 38899481 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.124.011970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Ten Berg
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands (S.t.B., J.P.S.H.). Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands (L.O.)
| | - Luuk Otterspoor
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands (S.t.B., J.P.S.H.). Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands (L.O.)
| | - José P S Henriques
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands (S.t.B., J.P.S.H.). Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands (L.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Stampfl M, DeBlieux P. A Clinical Review of Vasopressors in Emergency Medicine. J Emerg Med 2024; 67:e31-e41. [PMID: 38789351 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vasopressor medications raise blood pressure through vasoconstriction and are essential in reversing the hypotension seen in many critically ill patients. Previously, vasopressor administration was largely limited to continuous infusions through central venous access. OBJECTIVES OF THE REVIEW This review addresses the clinical use of vasopressors in various shock states, including practical considerations and innovations in vasopressor administration. The focus is on the clinical administration of vasopressors across a range of shock states, including hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic, and obstructive shock. DISCUSSION Criteria for starting vasopressors are not clearly defined, though early use may be beneficial. A number of physiologic factors affect the body's response to vasopressors, such as acidosis and adrenal insufficiency. Peripheral and push-dose administration of vasopressors are becoming more common. Distributive shock is characterized by inappropriate vasodilation and vasopressors play a crucial role in maintaining adequate blood pressure. The use of vasopressors is more controversial in hypovolemic shock, as the preferred treatment is correction of the volume deficit. Evidence for vasopressors is limited in cardiogenic shock. For obstructive shock, vasopressors can temporize a patient's blood pressure until definitive therapy can reverse the underlying cause. CONCLUSION Across the categories of shock states, norepinephrine has wide applicability and is a reasonable first-line agent for shock of uncertain etiology. Keeping a broad differential when hypotension is refractory to vasopressors may help to identify adjunctive treatments in physiologic states that impair vasopressor effectiveness. Peripheral administration of vasopressors is safe and facilitates early administration, which may help to improve outcomes in some shock states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Stampfl
- UW Health Med Flight, Madison, Wisconsin; BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin.
| | - Peter DeBlieux
- Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana; Tulane University School of Medicine Department of Surgery, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Hu Y, Lui A, Goldstein M, Sudarshan M, Tinsay A, Tsui C, Maidman SD, Medamana J, Jethani N, Puli A, Nguy V, Aphinyanaphongs Y, Kiefer N, Smilowitz NR, Horowitz J, Ahuja T, Fishman GI, Hochman J, Katz S, Bernard S, Ranganath R. Development and external validation of a dynamic risk score for early prediction of cardiogenic shock in cardiac intensive care units using machine learning. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:472-480. [PMID: 38518758 PMCID: PMC11214586 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Myocardial infarction and heart failure are major cardiovascular diseases that affect millions of people in the USA with morbidity and mortality being highest among patients who develop cardiogenic shock. Early recognition of cardiogenic shock allows prompt implementation of treatment measures. Our objective is to develop a new dynamic risk score, called CShock, to improve early detection of cardiogenic shock in the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS AND RESULTS We developed and externally validated a deep learning-based risk stratification tool, called CShock, for patients admitted into the cardiac ICU with acute decompensated heart failure and/or myocardial infarction to predict the onset of cardiogenic shock. We prepared a cardiac ICU dataset using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III database by annotating with physician-adjudicated outcomes. This dataset which consisted of 1500 patients with 204 having cardiogenic/mixed shock was then used to train CShock. The features used to train the model for CShock included patient demographics, cardiac ICU admission diagnoses, routinely measured laboratory values and vital signs, and relevant features manually extracted from echocardiogram and left heart catheterization reports. We externally validated the risk model on the New York University (NYU) Langone Health cardiac ICU database which was also annotated with physician-adjudicated outcomes. The external validation cohort consisted of 131 patients with 25 patients experiencing cardiogenic/mixed shock. CShock achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.821 (95% CI 0.792-0.850). CShock was externally validated in the more contemporary NYU cohort and achieved an AUROC of 0.800 (95% CI 0.717-0.884), demonstrating its generalizability in other cardiac ICUs. Having an elevated heart rate is most predictive of cardiogenic shock development based on Shapley values. The other top 10 predictors are having an admission diagnosis of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation, having an admission diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure, Braden Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, blood urea nitrogen, systolic blood pressure, serum chloride, serum sodium, and arterial blood pH. CONCLUSION The novel CShock score has the potential to provide automated detection and early warning for cardiogenic shock and improve the outcomes for millions of patients who suffer from myocardial infarction and heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxuan Hu
- Leon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Albert Lui
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Mark Goldstein
- Courant Institute of Mathematics, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Mukund Sudarshan
- Courant Institute of Mathematics, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Andrea Tinsay
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Cindy Tsui
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | | | - John Medamana
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Neil Jethani
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
- Courant Institute of Mathematics, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Aahlad Puli
- Courant Institute of Mathematics, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Vuthy Nguy
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | | | - Nicholas Kiefer
- Leon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Nathaniel R Smilowitz
- Leon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - James Horowitz
- Leon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Tania Ahuja
- Department of Pharmacy, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Glenn I Fishman
- Leon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Judith Hochman
- Leon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Stuart Katz
- Leon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Samuel Bernard
- Leon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Rajesh Ranganath
- Courant Institute of Mathematics, New York University, New York, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
- Center for Data Science, New York University, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Kang J, Marin-Cuartas M, Auerswald L, Deo SV, Borger M, Davierwala P, Verevkin A. Does Timing of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Impact Early- and Long-Term Outcomes? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024. [PMID: 38909603 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal timing of surgical revascularization after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is controversial, with some suggesting higher mortality rates in patients undergoing early surgery. The aim of the study is to determine the effect of the timing of surgical revascularization on 30-day mortality and long-term outcomes in these patients. METHODS Retrospective single-center analysis of patients with STEMI undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between January 2008 and December 2019 at our institution. The cohort was split into three groups based on time from symptom onset until surgical revascularization (Group 1: <12 hours, Group 2: 12-72 hours, Group 3: >72 hours). Statistical analyses were performed with and without patients in cardiogenic shock. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 10-year survival. RESULTS During the study period, 437 consecutive patients underwent surgical revascularization in the setting of STEMI. The mean age was 67.0 years, 96 (22.0%) patients were female, and 281 (64.3%) patients underwent off-pump CABG. The overall 30-day mortality including patients with cardiogenic shock was 12.8%. The 30-day mortality was 16.1, 13.9, and 9.3% in Groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.31), whereas 10-year survival was 48.5, 57.3, and 54.9% (log-rank: p = 0.40). After exclusion of patients in cardiogenic shock, there was no difference between the three groups in 30-day and 10-year mortality. Timing of surgery had no influence on early- and long-term survival. CONCLUSION In patients with STEMI, early surgical revascularization achieved similar early- and long-term survival rates compared with a delayed surgical revascularization strategy. Hence, when indicated, an early CABG strategy has no disadvantages in comparison to a delayed strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jagdip Kang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Centre University Hospital, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany
| | - Mateo Marin-Cuartas
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Centre University Hospital, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany
| | - Luise Auerswald
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Centre University Hospital, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany
| | - Salil V Deo
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Michael Borger
- Leipzig Heart Centre University Hospital, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany
| | - Piroze Davierwala
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander Verevkin
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Centre University Hospital, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Frye J, Tao M, Gupta S, Gier C, Masson R, Rahman T, Bench T, Mann N, Tam E. Safety and utility of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2024:S1553-8389(24)00545-1. [PMID: 38965019 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is an increasingly utilized therapeutic option in AMI-CS, studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of different forms of MCS have yielded conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different forms of MCS. METHODS A database search was performed for studies reporting on the association of different forms of MCS with clinical outcomes in patients with AMI-CS. The primary efficacy endpoints were short term (≤30 days) and long term (>30 days) all-cause mortality. Secondary efficacy endpoints included recurrent AMI, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, device-related limb complications, moderate to severe bleeding events, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). RESULTS 2752 patients with AMI-CS met inclusion criteria. Results were available comparing ECMO to other MCS or medical therapy alone, comparing IABP to medical therapy alone, and comparing pLVAD to IABP. Use of ECMO was not associated with lower risk of 30-day or long-term mortality compared to pVAD or standard medical therapy with or without IABP placement but was associated with higher risk of device-related limb complications and moderate to severe bleeding compared to pVAD. IABP use was not associated with a lower risk of 30 day or long-term mortality but was associated with higher risk of recurrent AMI and moderate to severe bleeding compared to medical therapy. Compared to IABP, pVAD use was associated with lower risk of CV mortality but not recurrent AMI. pVAD was associated with a higher risk of device-related limb complications and moderate to severe bleeding compared to IABP use. CONCLUSION Use of ECMO or IABP in patients with AMI-CS is not associated with significant improvement in mortality. pVAD is associated with a lower risk of CV mortality. All MCS types are associated with increased risk of complications. Additional high-quality studies are needed to determine the optimal MCS therapy for patients with AMI-CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Frye
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Michael Tao
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Shivani Gupta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Chad Gier
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Ravi Masson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Tahmid Rahman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Travis Bench
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Noelle Mann
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Edlira Tam
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Alkhunaizi FA, Smith N, Brusca SB, Furfaro D. The Management of Cardiogenic Shock From Diagnosis to Devices: A Narrative Review. CHEST CRITICAL CARE 2024; 2:100071. [PMID: 38993934 PMCID: PMC11238736 DOI: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogenous syndrome broadly characterized by inadequate cardiac output leading to tissue hypoperfusion and multisystem organ dysfunction that carries an ongoing high mortality burden. The management of CS has advanced rapidly, especially with the incorporation of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. A thorough understanding of how to approach a patient with CS and to select appropriate monitoring and treatment paradigms is essential in modern ICUs. Timely characterization of CS severity and hemodynamics is necessary to optimize outcomes, and this may be performed best by multidisciplinary shock-focused teams. In this article, we provide a review of CS aimed to inform both the cardiology-trained and non-cardiology-trained intensivist provider. We briefly describe the causes, pathophysiologic features, diagnosis, and severity staging of CS, focusing on gathering key information that is necessary for making management decisions. We go on to provide a more detailed review of CS management principles and practical applications, with a focus on tMCS. Medical management focuses on appropriate medication therapy to optimize perfusion-by enhancing contractility and minimizing afterload-and to facilitate decongestion. For more severe CS, or for patients with decompensating hemodynamic status despite medical therapy, initiation of the appropriate tMCS increasingly is common. We discuss the most common devices currently used for patients with CS-phenotyping patients as having left ventricular failure, right ventricular failure, or biventricular failure-and highlight key available data and particular points of consideration that inform tMCS device selection. Finally, we highlight core components of sedation and respiratory failure management for patients with CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatimah A Alkhunaizi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Nikolhaus Smith
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Samuel B Brusca
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - David Furfaro
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Widmer RJ, Hammonds K, Mixon T, Exaire JE, Chiles CD, Tavilla G, Szerlip MI, DiMaio JM. Acute Coronary Syndrome Revascularization Strategies With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Am J Cardiol 2024; 220:33-38. [PMID: 38582315 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
In acute coronary syndromes (ACS), revascularization is the standard of care. However, trials comparing contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. Optimal revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) presenting with ACS is unclear. This is a multicentered, retrospective observational study from a large hospital system in the United States. We abstracted data in patients with MV-CAD and ACS from 2018 to 2022 who underwent revascularization with PCI, CABG, or medical management (MM). We evaluated multivariate statistics comparing categorical variables and outcomes, including all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year. All logistic and Cox proportional-hazard models were balanced using inverse probability treatment weights accounting for age and gender. There were 295 patients with CABG (median age 66 years [interquartile range 59.7 to 73.1]; 73% male), 1,559 patients with PCI (median age 68.3 years [interquartile range 60 to 76.6]; 69.1% male], and 307 patients with MM (median age 70 years [60.9 to 77.1] 74% male]. Patients revascularized with PCI had greater all-cause mortality at 1 year (14.1% vs 5.1%; hazard ratio 2.4, confidence interval [1.5 to 3.8], p <0.001) and similar mortality to MM (13.4%). CABG also showed a reduced 1-year MI rate compared with PCI (1.7% vs 3.9%; hazard ratio 0.36, confidence interval 0.21 to 0.61, p ≤0.001), with a similar 1-year rate of MI to MM (3.9%). In conclusion, CABG is associated with lower mortality than are PCI and MM, and repeat ACS events at 1 year in patients with ACS and MV-CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Jay Widmer
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas.
| | - Kendall Hammonds
- Biostatistics, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Temple, Texas
| | - Timothy Mixon
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Tavilla
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas
| | - Molly I Szerlip
- Department of Cardiology, Baylor Scott and White, The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas
| | - J Michael DiMaio
- Department of Cardiology, Baylor Scott and White, The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Fernando SM, Qureshi D, Talarico R, Vigod SN, McIsaac DI, Sterling LH, van Diepen S, Price S, Di Santo P, Kyeremanteng K, Fan E, Needham DM, Brodie D, Bienvenu OJ, Combes A, Slutsky AS, Scales DC, Herridge MS, Thiele H, Hibbert B, Tanuseputro P, Mathew R. Mental health sequelae in survivors of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction. A population-based cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:901-912. [PMID: 38695924 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07399-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) is associated with substantial short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. However, there are limited data on mental health sequelae that survivors experience following discharge. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada of critically ill adult (≥ 18 years) survivors of AMI-CS, admitted to hospital between April 1, 2009 and March 31, 2019. We compared these patients to AMI survivors without shock. We captured outcome data using linked health administrative databases. The primary outcome was a new mental health diagnosis (a composite of mood, anxiety, or related disorders; schizophrenia/psychotic disorders; and other mental health disorders) following hospital discharge. We secondarily evaluated incidence of deliberate self-harm and death by suicide. We compared patients using overlap propensity score-weighted, cause-specific proportional hazard models. RESULTS We included 7812 consecutive survivors of AMI-CS, from 135 centers. Mean age was 68.4 (standard deviation (SD) 12.2) years, and 70.3% were male. Median follow-up time was 767 days (interquartile range (IQR) 225-1682). Incidence of new mental health diagnosis among AMI-CS survivors was 109.6 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval (CI) 105.4-113.9), compared with 103.8 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 102.5-105.2) among AMI survivors without shock. After propensity score adjustment, there was no difference in the risk of new mental health diagnoses following discharge [hazard ratio (HR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.03)]. Factors associated with new mental health diagnoses following AMI-CS included female sex, pre-existing mental health diagnoses, and discharge to a long-term hospital or rehabilitation institute. CONCLUSION Survivors of AMI-CS experience substantial mental health morbidity following discharge. Risk of new mental health diagnoses was comparable between survivors of AMI with and without shock. Future research on interventions to mitigate psychiatric sequelae after AMI-CS is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M Fernando
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- Department of Critical Care, Lakeridge Health Corporation, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Danial Qureshi
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Talarico
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Simone N Vigod
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Women's College Hospital and Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel I McIsaac
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Lee H Sterling
- Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Susanna Price
- Royal, Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Pietro Di Santo
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kwadwo Kyeremanteng
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Eddy Fan
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dale M Needham
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Brodie
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Oscar Joseph Bienvenu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alain Combes
- Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Service de Médeceine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut de Cardiologie, Paris, France
| | - Arthur S Slutsky
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Damon C Scales
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Margaret S Herridge
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Benjamin Hibbert
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca Mathew
- Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Colombo CN, Tavazzi G, Zanetti M, Dore F, Finazzi S. Cardiogenic shock diagnosis and management in general intensive care: a nationwide survey. Minerva Anestesiol 2024; 90:530-538. [PMID: 38551614 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.24.17908-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND the epidemiology of cardiogenic shock has evolved over the years: in the last decades an increasing prevalence of cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure was observed. Therefore, treatment bundles should be updated according to the underlying pathophysiology. No data exist regarding the diagnostic/therapeutic strategies in general intensive care units. METHODS A 27-questions survey was spread through the GiViTi (Italian Group for the Evaluation of Interventions in Intensive Care Medicine). The results were then divided according to level of hospitals (1st-2nd versus 3rd). RESULTS Sixty-nine general intensive care units replied to the survey. The shock team is present in 13% of institutions; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock classification is applied only in 18.8%. Among the ICUs, 94.2% routinely use a cardiac output monitoring device (pulmonary artery catheter more frequently in 3rd level centers). The first-line adrenergic drug are vasopressors in 27.5%, inotrope in 21.7% or their combination in 50.7%; 79.7% applies fluid challenge. The first vasopressor of choice is norepinephrine (95.7%) (maximum dosage tolerated higher than 0.5 mcg/kg/min in 29%); the first line inotrope is dobutamine (52.2%), followed by epinephrine in 36.2%. The most frequently used mechanical circulatory supports are intra-aortic balloon pump (71%), Impella (34.8%) and VA-ECMO (33.3%); VA-ECMO is the first line strategy in refractory cardiogenic shock (60.8%). CONCLUSIONS According to this survey, there is no standardized approach to cardiogenic shock amongst Italian general intensive care units. The application of shock severity stratification and the treatment bundles may play a key role in improving the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costanza N Colombo
- University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy -
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy -
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Pediatric, and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michele Zanetti
- Unit of Computer Science for Clinical Knowledge Sharing, Department of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Ranica, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Francesca Dore
- Laboratory of Clinical Data Science, Department of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Ranica, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Stefano Finazzi
- Laboratory of Clinical Data Science, Department of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Ranica, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Salvati S, D'Andria Ursoleo J, Belletti A, Monti G, Bonizzoni MA, Fazio M, Landoni G. Norepinephrine Salt Formulations and Risk of Therapeutic Error: Results of a National Survey. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024:S1053-0770(24)00365-3. [PMID: 38908934 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Norepinephrine is available commercially in solution containing its salt (eg, tartrate), but only the base form (ie, norepinephrine base) is active pharmacologically. Unfortunately, the outer label of drug packages frequently reports the dosage of norepinephrine as a salt, which can lead potentially to therapeutic errors when prescribing norepinephrine. We performed a survey to assess the level of awareness of this issue. DESIGN National survey. SETTING Acute care units of Italian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Acute care physicians and nurses. INTERVENTIONS A 15-item online survey was emailed to 305 critical care practitioners in Italy. Questions included information on the participants' background, methods of diluting norepinephrine, interpretation of recommended doses from guidelines, and a sample case related to the preparation and administration of the drug. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS We collected 106 responses from 54 hospitals. All hospitals used norepinephrine bitartrate salt. Of the participants, 53% responded that the guidelines express norepinephrine dosages as a salt, 23% as the base form, and 24% were unsure or unaware about it. The simulated patient-dose calculation was resolved in 81% of cases with an incorrect calculation referring to the norepinephrine salt and only in 19% referring to the norepinephrine base. CONCLUSIONS There is significant variability in dosage management of norepinephrine across different hospital units, as well as a lack of knowledge regarding the salt-to-base ratio. Scientific publications (eg, guidelines) should specify whether they are referring to the base or salt form of norepinephrine. The adoption of different labeling and national standards for dilution may decrease the risk of therapeutic errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Salvati
- Hospital Pharmacy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Jacopo D'Andria Ursoleo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Belletti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giacomo Monti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Aldo Bonizzoni
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Fazio
- Hospital Pharmacy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Landoni
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Nishimura T, Hirata Y, Ise T, Iwano H, Izutani H, Kinugawa K, Kitai T, Ohno T, Ohtani T, Okumura T, Ono M, Satomi K, Shiose A, Toda K, Tsukamoto Y, Yamaguchi O, Fujino T, Hashimoto T, Higashi H, Higashino A, Kondo T, Kurobe H, Miyoshi T, Nakamoto K, Nakamura M, Saito T, Saku K, Shimada S, Sonoda H, Unai S, Ushijima T, Watanabe T, Yahagi K, Fukushima N, Inomata T, Kyo S, Minamino T, Minatoya K, Sakata Y, Sawa Y. JCS/JSCVS/JCC/CVIT 2023 Guideline Focused Update on Indication and Operation of PCPS/ECMO/IMPELLA. Circ J 2024; 88:1010-1046. [PMID: 38583962 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-23-0698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Nishimura
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Yasutaka Hirata
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Takayuki Ise
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital
| | | | - Hironori Izutani
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | | - Takeshi Kitai
- Department of Heart Failure and Transplantation, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Takayuki Ohno
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mitsui Memorial Hospital
| | - Tomohito Ohtani
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Takahiro Okumura
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Minoru Ono
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Kazuhiro Satomi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical University Hospital
| | - Akira Shiose
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyushu University Hospital
| | - Koichi Toda
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center
| | - Yasumasa Tsukamoto
- Department of Transplant Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Osamu Yamaguchi
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension and Nephrology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Takeo Fujino
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Failure, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
| | - Toru Hashimoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
| | - Haruhiko Higashi
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension and Nephrology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | | - Toru Kondo
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Hirotsugu Kurobe
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Toru Miyoshi
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension and Nephrology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kei Nakamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Makiko Nakamura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama
| | - Tetsuya Saito
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Keita Saku
- Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Shogo Shimada
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital
| | - Hiromichi Sonoda
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyushu University Hospital
| | - Shinya Unai
- Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic
| | - Tomoki Ushijima
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyushu University Hospital
| | - Takuya Watanabe
- Department of Transplant Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | | | | | - Takayuki Inomata
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences
| | - Shunei Kyo
- Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology
| | - Tohru Minamino
- Department of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kenji Minatoya
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | - Yasushi Sakata
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
67
|
González-Pacheco H, Amezcua-Guerra LM, Franco M, Arias-Mendoza A, Ortega-Hernández JA, Massó F. Cytoprotection as an Innovative Therapeutic Strategy to Cardiogenic Shock: Exploring the Potential of Cytidine-5-Diphosphocholine to Mitigate Target Organ Damage. J Vasc Res 2024; 61:160-165. [PMID: 38776883 DOI: 10.1159/000538946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preservation of organ function and viability is a crucial factor for survival in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients. There is not information enough on cytoprotective substances that may delay organs damage in CS. We hypothesize that cytidine-5-diphosphocholine (CDP-choline) can act as a cytoprotective pharmacological measure that diminishes the target organ damage. So, we aimed to perform a review of works carried out in our institution to evaluate the effect of therapeutic cytoprotection of the CDP-choline. SUMMARY CDP-choline is an intermediate metabolite in the synthesis of phosphatidylcholine. It is also a useful drug for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, and neurodegenerative diseases and has shown an excellent pharmacological safety profile as well. We review our institution's work and described the cytoprotective effects of CDP-choline in experimental models of heart, liver, and kidney acute damage, where this compound was shown to diminish reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias, oxidative stress, apoptotic cell death, inflammation, lactic acid levels and to preserve mitochondrial function. KEY MESSAGES We propose that additional research is needed to evaluate the impact of cytoprotective therapy adjuvant to mitigate target organ damage in patients with CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Martha Franco
- Department of Renal Pathophysiology, National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Felipe Massó
- Translational Medicine Laboratory, National Institute of Cardiology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Nair RM, Chawla S, Abdelghaffar B, Alkhalaieh F, Bansal A, Puri R, Yun J, Krishnaswamy A, Kapadia S, Menon V, Reed GW. Comparison of Contemporary Treatment Strategies in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Due to Severe Aortic Stenosis. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e033601. [PMID: 38761069 PMCID: PMC11179830 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.033601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of this study were to understand the incidence and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to severe aortic stenosis (AS), and the impact of conventional treatment strategies in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS All patients admitted to the Cleveland Clinic cardiac intensive care unit between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2021 with CS were retrospectively identified and categorized into those with CS in the setting of severe AS versus CS without AS. The impact of various treatment strategies on mortality was further assessed. We identified 2754 patients with CS during the study period, of whom 216 patients (8%) had CS in the setting of severe AS. Medical management was associated with the highest 30-day mortality when compared with either balloon aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement (surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement) (hazard ratio, 3.69 [95% CI, 2.04-6.66]; P<0.0001). Among patients who received transcatheter therapy, 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who received balloon aortic valvuloplasty versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (26% versus 4%, P=0.02). Both surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement had considerably lower mortality than medical management and balloon aortic valvuloplasty at 30 days and 1 year (P<0.05 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS CS due to severe AS is associated with high in-hospital and 30-day mortality, worse compared with those with CS without AS. In suitable patients, urgent surgical aortic valvuloplasty or transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with favorable short- and long-term outcomes. Although balloon aortic valvuloplasty may be used to temporize patients with CS in the setting of severe AS, mortality is ≈50% if not followed by definitive aortic valve replacement within 90 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raunak M Nair
- Cleveland Clinic Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute Cleveland OH USA
| | - Sanchit Chawla
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation Internal Medicine Department Cleveland OH USA
| | - Bahaa Abdelghaffar
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation Internal Medicine Department Cleveland OH USA
| | - Feras Alkhalaieh
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation Internal Medicine Department Cleveland OH USA
| | - Agam Bansal
- Cleveland Clinic Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute Cleveland OH USA
| | - Rishi Puri
- Cleveland Clinic Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute Cleveland OH USA
| | - James Yun
- Cleveland Clinic Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute Cleveland OH USA
| | - Amar Krishnaswamy
- Cleveland Clinic Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute Cleveland OH USA
| | - Samir Kapadia
- Cleveland Clinic Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute Cleveland OH USA
| | - Venu Menon
- Cleveland Clinic Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute Cleveland OH USA
| | - Grant W Reed
- Cleveland Clinic Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute Cleveland OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Jung S, Jang WJ, Lee WS, Park IH, Oh JH, Yang JH, Gwon HC, Ahn CM, Yu CW, Kim HJ, Bae JW, Kwon SU, Lee HJ, Jeong JO, Park SD. Seasonal variation and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Heliyon 2024; 10:e30078. [PMID: 38720697 PMCID: PMC11076878 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about the association between seasonal variation and prognosis in patients with CS caused by AMI. Objectives We investigated the 12-month clinical outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) according to season. Methods A total of 695 patients undergoing PCI for AMI complicated by CS was enrolled from 12 centers in South Korea. The study patients were divided into four groups according to season in which the AMI with CS occurred (spring, n = 178 vs. summer, n = 155 vs. autumn, n = 182 vs. winter, n = 180). We compared major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, re-hospitalization due to heart failure, and any revascularization) between the four groups. Results The risk of MACE during the 12 months after CS was similar in the four groups: spring, 68 patients, vs. summer, 69, vs. autumn, 73, vs. winter, 68 (p = 0.587). Multivariate Cox-regression analysis revealed no significant difference in 12-month MACE among groups compared to the spring group after inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment (summer, HR 1.40, 95 % CI 0.98-1.99, p = 0.062; autumn, HR 1.26, 95 % CI 0.89-1.80, p = 0.193; winter, HR 1.18, 95 % CI 0.83-1.67, p = 0.356). The similarity of MACE between the four groups was consistent across a variety of subgroups. Conclusions After adjusting for baseline differences, seasonal variation seems not to influence the mid-term risk of 12-month MACE in patients treated with PCI for AMI complicated by CS. Condensed abstract Data are limited regarding the association between seasonal variation and prognosis in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) caused by AMI. This study divided patients undergoing PCI for AMI complicated by CS into four groups based on the season of occurrence and found no significant differences in 12-month MACE between the groups after adjusting for bias and confounding factors. Multivariate analysis revealed consistent MACE similarity across subgroups. The study suggests that seasonal variation has no impact on the mid-term risk of 12-month MACE in patients with CS caused by AMI, after adjusting for baseline differences. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02985008RESCUE (REtrospective and prospective observational Study to investigate Clinical oUtcomes and Efficacy of left ventricular assist device for Korean patients with cardiogenic shock), NCT02985008, Registered December 5, 2016 - retrospectively and prospectively. Irb information This study was approved by the institutional review board of Samsung Medical Center (Reference number: 2016-03-130).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sodam Jung
- Department of Cardiology, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Jin Jang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Wang Soo Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ik hyun Park
- Department of Cardiology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju Hyeon Oh
- Department of Cardiology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Hoon Yang
- Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
- Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul-Min Ahn
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheol Woong Yu
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Joong Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jang-Whan Bae
- Division of Cardiology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Uk Kwon
- Division of Cardiology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, University of Inje College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Jong Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Ok Jeong
- Division of Cardiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Don Park
- Division of Cardiology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Chien SC, Wang CA, Liu HY, Lin CF, Huang CY, Chien LN. Comparison of the prognosis among in-hospital survivors of cardiogenic shock based on etiology: AMI and Non-AMI. Ann Intensive Care 2024; 14:74. [PMID: 38735891 PMCID: PMC11089020 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01305-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current data on post-discharge mortality and rehospitalization is still insufficient among in-hospital survivors of cardiogenic shock (CS), including acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and non-AMI survivors. METHODS Patients with CS who survived after hospital discharge were selected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Each patient was followed up at 3-year intervals. Mortality and rehospitalization were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS There were 16,582 eligible patients. Of these, 42.4% and 57.6% were AMI-CS and non-AMI-CS survivors, respectively. The overall mortality and rehospitalization rates were considerably high, with reports of 7.0% and 22.1% at 30 days, 24.5% and 58.2% at 1 year, and 38.9% and 73.0% at 3 years, respectively, among in-hospital CS survivors. Cardiovascular (CV) problems caused approximately 40% mortality and 60% rehospitalization. Overall, the non-AMI-CS group had a higher mortality burden than the AMI-CS group owing to older age and a higher prevalence of comorbidities. In multivariable models, the non-AMI-CS group exhibited a lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.78) and CV mortality (aHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.78) compared to the AMI-CS group. However, these risks diminished and even reversed after one year (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.25 for all-cause mortality; aHR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.49 for CV mortality).This reversal was not observed in all-cause and CV rehospitalization. For rehospitalization, AMI-CS was associated with the risk of CV rehospitalization in the entire observation period (aHR:0.80, 95% CI:0.76-0.84). CONCLUSIONS In-hospital AMI-CS survivors had an increased risk of CV rehospitalization and 30-day mortality, whereas those with non-AMI-CS had a greater mortality risk after 1-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih-Chieh Chien
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-An Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Yi Liu
- Health and Clinical Research Data Center, Office of Data Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Feng Lin
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Yao Huang
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Nien Chien
- Institute of Health and Welfare Policy, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Data Science, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Sá MP, Jacquemyn X, Hess N, Brown JA, Caldonazo T, Kirov H, Doenst T, Serna-Gallegos D, Kaczorowski D, Sultan I. Extracorporeal life support after surgical repair for acute type a aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Perfusion 2024:2676591241253464. [PMID: 38730556 DOI: 10.1177/02676591241253464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in patients after surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) has not been well documented. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of ECLS after surgery for ATAAD with data published by October 2023 in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023479955). RESULTS Twelve observational studies met our eligibility criteria, including 280 patients. Mean age was 55.0 years and women represented 25.3% of the overall population. Although the mean preoperative left ventricle ejection fraction was 59.8%, 60.8% of patients developed left ventricle failure and 34.0% developed biventricular failure. Coronary involvement and malperfusion were found in 37.1% and 25.6%, respectively. Concomitant coronary bypass surgery was performed in 38.5% of patients. Regarding ECLS, retrograde flow (femoral) was present in 39.9% and central cannulation was present in 35.4%. In-hospital mortality was 62.8% and pooled estimate of successful weaning was 50.8%. Neurological complications, bleeding and renal failure were found in 25.9%, 38.7%, and 65.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION ECLS after surgical repair for ATAAD remains associated with high rates of in-hospital death and complications, but it still represents a chance of survival in critical situations. ECLS remains a salvage attempt and surgeons should not try to avoid ECLS at all costs after repairing an ATAAD case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Pompeu Sá
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Xander Jacquemyn
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicholas Hess
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James A Brown
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Hristo Kirov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Derek Serna-Gallegos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Kaczorowski
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ibrahim Sultan
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Shavadia JS, Okpalauwaekwe U, Kim M, Orvold J, Pearce C, King A, Ametepee K, Haddad H. Contemporary Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Indigenous Compared With Non-Indigenous Patients: A Northern Saskatchewan Perspective. Can J Cardiol 2024:S0828-282X(24)00354-4. [PMID: 38729604 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the impact of efforts to bridge historical care gaps between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients remains limited. METHODS For consecutive ACS presentations (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]/unstable angina [UA], respectively) at the Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, we compared self-identified Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients' demographics, treatments, and all-cause mortality (in-hospital and within 3 years). We used propensity score inverse probability weighting to mitigate confounding and Cox regression models to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for all-cause mortality. RESULTS Of 3946 ACS patients, 37.2% (n = 1468) were STEMI, of whom 11.3% (n = 166) were Indigenous. Of the NSTEMI/UA (n = 2478), 12.6% (n = 311), were Indigenous. Overall, Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous patients were likely to be younger, female, have higher risk burden, and live more remotely; Indigenous STEMI patients triaged to primary percutaneous coronary intervention had longer times from first medical contact to device, and Indigenous NSTEMI/UA patients more likely to present with heart failure, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock. No significant differences were noted for in-hospital mortality (STEMI 8.4% vs 5.7% [P = 0.16], NSTEMI/UA 1.9% vs 1.6% [P = 0.68]), although in follow-up, Indigenous STEMI patients were associated with a higher all-cause mortality risk (aHR 1.98, 95% CI 1.19-3.31; P = 0.009) with no between-group differences evident for NSTEMI/UA (aHR 1.03, 95% CI 0.63 1.69; P = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous patients presenting with an ACS had higher cardiovascular risk profiles and consequent residual mortality risk. Improving primary care and intensifying secondary risk reduction, particularly for Indigenous patients, will substantially modify ACS outcomes in Saskatchewan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay S Shavadia
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
| | - Udoka Okpalauwaekwe
- Department of Academic Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Minyoung Kim
- Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Jason Orvold
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Colin Pearce
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Alexandra King
- Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; Pewaseskwan Indigenous Wellness Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Kehinde Ametepee
- Pewaseskwan Indigenous Wellness Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Haissam Haddad
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Estévez-Loureiro R, Lorusso R, Taramasso M, Torregrossa G, Kini A, Moreno PR. Management of Severe Mitral Regurgitation in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: JACC Focus Seminar 2/5. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:1799-1817. [PMID: 38692830 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Severe acute mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction includes partial and complete papillary muscle rupture or functional mitral regurgitation. Although its incidence is <1%, mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction frequently causes hemodynamic instability, pulmonary edema, and cardiogenic shock. Medical management has the worst prognosis, and mortality has not changed in decades. Surgery represents the gold standard, but it is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Recently, transcatheter interventions have opened a new door for management that may improve survival. Mechanical circulatory support restores vital organ perfusion and offers the opportunity for a steadier surgical repair. This review focuses on the diagnosis and the interventional management, both surgical and transcatheter, with a glance on future perspectives to enhance patient management and eventually decrease mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roberto Lorusso
- Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Gianluca Torregrossa
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lankenau Heart Institute, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Annapoorna Kini
- Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pedro R Moreno
- Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Zeymer U, Heer T, Ouarrak T, Akin I, Noc M, Stepinska J, Oldroyd K, Serpytis P, Montalescot G, Huber K, Windecker S, Savonitto S, Vrints C, Schneider S, Desch S, Thiele H. Current spectrum and outcomes of infarct-related cardiogenic shock: insights from the CULPRIT-SHOCK registry and randomized controlled trial. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:335-346. [PMID: 38349233 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
AIMS We analysed consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) who were enrolled into the CULPRIT-SHOCK randomized controlled trial (RCT) and those with exclusion criteria who were included into the accompanying registry. METHODS AND RESULTS In total, 1075 patients with infarct-related CS were screened for CULPRIT-SHOCK in 83 specialized centres in Europe; 369 of them had exclusion criteria for the RCT and were enrolled into the registry. Patients were followed over 1 year. The mean age was 68 years and 260 (25%) were women. 13.5%, 30.9%, and 55.6% had one-vessel, two-vessel, and three-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD), respectively. Significant left main (LM) coronary artery stenosis was present in 8.0%. 54.2% of the patients had cardiac arrest before admission. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 patency of the infarct vessel after percutaneous coronary intervention was achieved in 83.6% of all patients. Mechanical circulatory support was applied in one-third of patients. Total mortality after 30 days and 1 year was 47.6% and 52.9%. Mortality after 1 year was highest in patients with LM coronary artery stenosis (63.5%), followed by three-vessel (56.6%), two-vessel (49.8%), and one-vessel CAD (38.6%), respectively. Mechanical complications were rare (21/1008; 2.1%) but associated with a high mortality of 66.7% after 1 year. CONCLUSION In specialized centres in Europe, short- and long-term mortality of patients with infarct-related CS treated with an invasive strategy is still high and mainly depends on the extent of CAD. Therefore, there is still a need for improvement of care to improve the prognosis of infarct-related CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Zeymer
- Department of Cardiology, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Tobias Heer
- Department of Cardiology, München Klinik Neuperlach, Academic Teaching Hospital, LMU University of Munich, Oskar-Maria-Graf-Ring 51, 81737 Munich, Germany
| | - Taoufik Ouarrak
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Ibrahim Akin
- Department of Cardiology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marko Noc
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Janina Stepinska
- Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Keith Oldroyd
- Department of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pranas Serpytis
- Department of Cardiology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Giles Montalescot
- Department of Cardiology, ACTION Study Group, Sorbonne Université Paris 6, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Kurt Huber
- Department of Cardiology, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Cardiology, Medical School, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Windecker
- Department of Cardiology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Christiaan Vrints
- Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Steffen Schneider
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Steffen Desch
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Warren A, McCall P, Proudfoot A, Gillon S, Abu-Arafeh A, McKnight AJ, Mudie R, Armstrong D, Tzolos E, Livesey JA, Sinclair A, Baston V, Dalzell J, Owen D, Fleming L, Scott I, Puxty A, Lee MMY, Walker F, Hobson S, Campbell E, Kinsella M, McGinnigle E, Docking R, Price G, Ramsay A, Bauld R, Herron S, Lone NI, Mills NL, Hartley L. EPidemiology Of Cardiogenic sHock in Scotland (EPOCHS): A multicentre, prospective observational study of the prevalence, management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in Scotland. J Intensive Care Soc 2024; 25:147-155. [PMID: 38737313 PMCID: PMC11086715 DOI: 10.1177/17511437231217877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Despite high rates of cardiovascular disease in Scotland, the prevalence and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock are unknown. Methods We undertook a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or coronary care unit at 13 hospitals in Scotland for a 6-month period. Denominator data from the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group were used to estimate ICU prevalence; data for coronary care units were unavailable. We undertook multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results In total, 247 patients with cardiogenic shock were included. After exclusion of coronary care unit admissions, this comprised 3.0% of all ICU admissions during the study period (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6%-3.5%). Aetiology was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 48%. The commonest vasoactive treatment was noradrenaline (56%) followed by adrenaline (46%) and dobutamine (40%). Mechanical circulatory support was used in 30%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 55%. After multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06), admission lactate (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.19), Society for Cardiovascular Angiographic Intervention stage D or E at presentation (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.10-4.29) and use of adrenaline (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.40-5.40) were associated with mortality. Conclusions In Scotland the prevalence of cardiogenic shock was 3% of all ICU admissions; more than half died prior to discharge. There was significant variation in treatment approaches, particularly with respect to vasoactive support strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Warren
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Barts Heart Centre, London, UK
| | - Philip McCall
- Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Peri-Operative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Barts Heart Centre, London, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ian Scott
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nazir I Lone
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nicholas L Mills
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- BHF/University Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
76
|
Patel SM, Berg DD, Bohula EA, Baird-Zars VM, Barsness GW, Chaudhry SP, Chonde MD, Cooper HA, Ginder C, Jentzer JC, Kontos MC, Miller PE, Newby LK, O'Brien CG, Park JG, Pierce MJ, Pisani BA, Potter BJ, Shah KS, Teuteberg JJ, Katz JN, van Diepen S, Morrow DA. Early Serial Assessment of Aggregate Vasoactive Support and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry. Circ Heart Fail 2024; 17:e011736. [PMID: 38587438 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.124.011736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Associations of early changes in vasoactive support with cardiogenic shock (CS) mortality remain incompletely defined. METHODS The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter registry of cardiac intensive care units. Patients admitted with CS (2018-2023) had vasoactive dosing assessed at 4 and 24 hours from cardiac intensive care unit admission and quantified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS). Prognostic associations of VIS at both time points, as well as change in VIS from 4 to 24 hours, were examined. Interaction testing was performed based on mechanical circulatory support status. RESULTS Among 3665 patients, 82% had a change in VIS <10, with 7% and 11% having a ≥10-point increase and decrease from 4 to 24 hours, respectively. The 4 and 24-hour VIS were each associated with cardiac intensive care unit mortality (13%-45% and 11%-73% for VIS <10 to ≥40, respectively; Ptrend <0.0001 for each). Stratifying by the 4-hour VIS, changes in VIS from 4 to 24 hours had a graded association with mortality, ranging from a 2- to >4-fold difference in mortality comparing those with a ≥10-point increase to ≥10-point decrease in VIS (Ptrend <0.0001). The change in VIS alone provided good discrimination of cardiac intensive care unit mortality (C-statistic, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.70-0.75]) and improved discrimination of the 24-hour Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0.72 [95% CI, 0.69-0.74] to 0.76 [95% CI, 0.74-0.78]) and the clinician-assessed Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock stage (0.72 [95% CI, 0.70-0.74] to 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75-0.79]). Although present in both groups, the mortality risk associated with VIS was attenuated in patients managed with versus without mechanical circulatory support (odds ratio per 10-point higher 24-hour VIS, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.23-1.49] versus 1.84 [95% CI, 1.69-2.01]; Pinteraction <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Early changes in the magnitude of vasoactive support in CS are associated with a gradient of risk for mortality. These data suggest that early VIS trajectory may improve CS prognostication, with the potential to be leveraged for clinical decision-making and research applications in CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddharth M Patel
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - David D Berg
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - Erin A Bohula
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - Vivian M Baird-Zars
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - Gregory W Barsness
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (G.W.B., J.C.J.)
| | | | - Meshe D Chonde
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.D.C.)
| | - Howard A Cooper
- Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY (H.A.C.)
| | - Curtis Ginder
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (G.W.B., J.C.J.)
| | - Michael C Kontos
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.C.K.)
| | - P Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (P.E.M.)
| | - L Kristin Newby
- Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (L.K.N.)
| | - Connor G O'Brien
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (C.G.O.B.)
| | - Jeong-Gun Park
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| | - Matthew J Pierce
- Department of Cardiology, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY (M.J.P.)
| | - Barbara A Pisani
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (B.A.P.)
| | - Brian J Potter
- Cardiology Service, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Research Center and Cardiovascular Center, Quebec, QC, Canada (B.J.P.)
| | - Kevin S Shah
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (K.S.S.)
| | - Jeffrey J Teuteberg
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (J.J.T.)
| | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York (J.N.K.)
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (S.v.D.)
| | - David A Morrow
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Zapata L, Gómez-López R, Llanos-Jorge C, Duerto J, Martin-Villen L. Cardiogenic shock as a health issue. Physiology, classification, and detection. Med Intensiva 2024; 48:282-295. [PMID: 38458914 DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous syndrome with high mortality and a growing incidence. It is characterized by an imbalance between the tissue oxygen demands and the capacity of the cardiovascular system to meet these demands, due to acute cardiac dysfunction. Historically, acute coronary syndromes have been the primary cause of CS. However, non-ischemic cases have seen a rise in incidence. The pathophysiology involves ischemic damage of the myocardium and a sympathetic, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and inflammatory response, perpetuating the situation of tissue hypoperfusion and ultimately leading to multiorgan dysfunction. The characterization of CS patients through a triaxial assessment and the widespread use of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) scale has allowed standardization of the severity stratification of CS; this, coupled with early detection and the "hub and spoke" approach, could contribute to improving the prognosis of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Zapata
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Rocío Gómez-López
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain
| | - Celina Llanos-Jorge
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Jorge Duerto
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Martin-Villen
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Gillespie LE, Lane BH, Shaw CR, Gorder K, Grisoli A, Lavallee M, Gobble O, Vidosh J, Deimling D, Ahmad S, Hinckley WR, Brent CM, Lauria MJ, Gottula AL. The Intra-aortic Balloon Pump: A Focused Review of Physiology, Transport Logistics, Mechanics, and Complications. JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY & INTERVENTIONS 2024; 3:101337. [PMID: 39132456 PMCID: PMC11307388 DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Critical care transport medicine (CCTM) teams are playing an increasing role in the care of patients in cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support devices. Hence, it is important that CCTM providers are familiar with the pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock, the role of mechanical circulatory support, and the management of these devices in the transport environment. The intra-aortic balloon pump is a widely used and accessible cardiac support device capable of increasing cardiac output and reducing work on the left ventricle through diastolic augmentation and counterpulsation. This article reviews essential CCTM-based considerations for patients supported by intra-aortic balloon pump, including indications for placement, mechanics and physiology, potential issues during transport, and associated complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E. Gillespie
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Division of Air Care & Mobile Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Bennett H. Lane
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Division of Air Care & Mobile Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Christopher R. Shaw
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Kari Gorder
- The Christ Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Anne Grisoli
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Division of Air Care & Mobile Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Matthew Lavallee
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Cardiovascular Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Olivia Gobble
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Division of Air Care & Mobile Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jacqueline Vidosh
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Diana Deimling
- Division of Air Care & Mobile Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Saad Ahmad
- Division of Cardiovascular Health and Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - William R. Hinckley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Division of Air Care & Mobile Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Christine M. Brent
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Michael J. Lauria
- Lifeguard Air Emergency Services, University of New Mexico Hospital, Albuquerque, New Mexico
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Adam L. Gottula
- Texas IPS at San Antonio Methodist Hospital, San Antonio, Texas
- Institute for Extracorporeal Life Support, San Antonio, Texas
- The Weil Institute for Critical Care Research & Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Mu CT, Lin YJ, Chen CH, Hsia SH, Lin JJ, Chan OW, Yen CW, Chiu CC, Chang HP, Su YT, Lee EP. Diastolic/systolic blood pressure ratio for predicting febrile children with sepsis and progress to septic shock in the emergency department. BMC Emerg Med 2024; 24:78. [PMID: 38693496 PMCID: PMC11064385 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-00995-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given the scarcity of studies analyzing the clinical predictors of pediatric septic cases that would progress to septic shock, this study aimed to determine strong predictors for pediatric emergency department (PED) patients with sepsis at risk for septic shock and mortality. METHODS We conducted chart reviews of patients with ≥ 2 age-adjusted quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA) criteria to recognize patients with an infectious disease in two tertiary PEDs between January 1, 2021, and April 30, 2022. The age range of included patients was 1 month to 18 years. The primary outcome was development of septic shock within 48 h of PED attendance. The secondary outcome was sepsis-related 28-day mortality. Initial important variables in the PED and hemodynamics with the highest and lowest values during the first 24 h of admission were also analyzed. RESULTS Overall, 417 patients were admitted because of sepsis and met the eligibility criteria for the study. Forty-nine cases progressed to septic shock within 48 h after admission and 368 were discharged without progression. General demographics, laboratory data, and hemodynamics were analyzed by multivariate analysis. Only the minimum diastolic blood pressure/systolic blood pressure ratio (D/S ratio) during the first 24 h after admission remained as an independent predictor of progression to septic shock and 28-day mortality. The best cutoff values of the D/S ratio for predicting septic shock and 28-day mortality were 0.52 and 0.47, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The D/S ratio is a practical bedside scoring system in the PED and had good discriminative ability in predicting the progression of septic shock and in-hospital mortality in PED patients. Further validation is essential in other settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Ting Mu
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Jui Lin
- Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Ho Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shao-Hsuan Hsia
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linko, No. 5, Fu-Hsin Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jainn-Jim Lin
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linko, No. 5, Fu-Hsin Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Chang Gung Children's Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Oi-Wa Chan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linko, No. 5, Fu-Hsin Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Wei Yen
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Che Chiu
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Pediatrics, Tucheng Composite Municipal Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Han-Pi Chang
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linko, No. 5, Fu-Hsin Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Ting Su
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan
| | - En-Pei Lee
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linko, No. 5, Fu-Hsin Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Zhou X, Tan W, Liu M, Liu N. Predicting the mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock after coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusion 2024; 39:807-815. [PMID: 36935559 DOI: 10.1177/02676591231161275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition and the leading cause of mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). To define the risk factors for CS in patients who undergo CABG and create a risk-predictive model is crucial. METHODS In this observational study, we retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent CABG between January 2018 and October 2022 at Beijing Anzhen Hospital. A total of 496 patients were enrolled and categorized into the training (396 cases) and internal test (100 cases) sets. The variables significantly associated with mortality (p < 0.05) were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS The E/A ratio at admission, postoperative brain natriuretic peptide, postoperative arterial lactate, two or more arrhythmias at the same time after CABG, and carotid artery stenosis at admission were identified as independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality after multivariate logistic regression analysis. The CS after CABG score (ACCS) was established and three classes of ACCS, named classes I (ACCS, <20), II (ACCS, 20-30), and III (ACCS, >30), made up the risk model. The ACCS showed better discrimination with an AUROC of 0.937 (95% confidence interval, 0.982-0.892) and calibration with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (X2 = 5.854 with 8 df; p = 0.664). In addition, tenfold cross-validation demonstrated that the mean misdiagnosis rate was 5.56% and the lowest misdiagnosis rate was 6.38%. CONCLUSION The ACCS score represents a risk-predictive model for in-hospital mortality of patients with CS after CABG in acute care settings. Patients identified as class III may have a worse prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaozheng Zhou
- Center for Cardiac Intensive, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wen Tan
- Center for Cardiac Intensive, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Maomao Liu
- Center for Cardiac Intensive, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Liu
- Center for Cardiac Intensive, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Tennyson C, Grant S, Chow BH, Sarsam MA, Kadir I, Dimarakis I. Custodiol cardioplegia for temporary mechanical circulatory support. Perfusion 2024; 39:698-701. [PMID: 36898009 DOI: 10.1177/02676591231162435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Several patients requiring biventricular mechanical circulatory support in the acute setting will not be candidates for less invasive advanced heart failure therapies not requiring median sternotomy. Temporary biventricular assist device may provide reliable short term support bridging patients to recovery or further advanced treatments. However, this exposes patients to increased risk of reoperation due to bleeding and further exposure to blood products. This article outlines the practical details necessary in performing this technique while minimizing potential complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene Tennyson
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Stuart Grant
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bobby Hn Chow
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mazin Ai Sarsam
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Isaac Kadir
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Ioannis Dimarakis
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Lee OH, Heo SJ, Johnson TW, Kim Y, Cho DK, Kim JS, Kim BK, Choi D, Hong MK, Jang Y, Jeong MH. Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Sci Rep 2024; 14:10028. [PMID: 38693210 PMCID: PMC11063208 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59723-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The benefits of intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the clinical context of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction are lacking. We aimed to investigate the impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with AMI and CS. From the pooled data based on a series of Korean AMI registries during 2011-2020, we identified 1418 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with second generation drug-eluting stent (DES) for AMI and CS. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization. In total, 294 (20.7%) and 1124 (79.3%) underwent IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI with second generation DES implantation, respectively. The 1-year TLF was not significantly different between groups after IPTW analysis (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.65-1.34, p = 0.70). Additionally, the adjusted landmark analysis for TLF at 30 days and between 30 days and 1 year after PCI demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. In conclusion, in patients with AMI and CS who underwent PCI with second-generation DES, IVUS-guided PCI did not improve the 1-year TLF compared with angiography-guided PCI.Registration: URL: http://cris.nih.go.kr . KCT0000863 and KCT0008355.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oh-Hyun Lee
- Yonsei University College of Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Yongin Severance Hospital, 363 Dongbaekjukjeon-Daero, Giheung-Gu, Yongin, 16995, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Jae Heo
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Yongcheol Kim
- Yonsei University College of Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Yongin Severance Hospital, 363 Dongbaekjukjeon-Daero, Giheung-Gu, Yongin, 16995, Republic of Korea.
| | - Deok-Kyu Cho
- Yonsei University College of Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Yongin Severance Hospital, 363 Dongbaekjukjeon-Daero, Giheung-Gu, Yongin, 16995, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Sun Kim
- Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byeong-Keuk Kim
- Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Donghoon Choi
- Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myeong-Ki Hong
- Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yangsoo Jang
- Department of Cardiology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung Ho Jeong
- Chonnam National University Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Cardiology, Principal investigator of the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry, Chonnam National University Hospital, 42 Jebong-Ro, Dong-Gu, Gwangju, 61469, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Bello AR, Tralhão A. Non-invasive ventilation for cardiogenic shock associated respiratory failure - Striking the perfect balance between risk and benefit. Rev Port Cardiol 2024; 43:275-277. [PMID: 37931851 DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Rita Bello
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Carnaxide, Portugal
| | - António Tralhão
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Carnaxide, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Picod A, Nordin H, Jarczak D, Zeller T, Oddos C, Santos K, Hartmann O, Herpain A, Mebazaa A, Kluge S, Azibani F, Karakas M. High Circulating Dipeptidyl Peptidase 3 Predicts Mortality and Need for Organ Support in Cardiogenic Shock: An Ancillary Analysis of the ACCOST-HH Trial. J Card Fail 2024:S1071-9164(24)00146-5. [PMID: 38697465 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiogenic shock (CS) is burdened with high mortality. Efforts to improve outcome are hampered by the difficulty of individual risk stratification and the lack of targetable pathways. Previous studies demonstrated that elevated circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (cDPP3) is an early predictor of short-term outcome in CS, mostly of ischemic origin. Our objective was to investigate the association between cDPP3 and short-term outcomes in a diverse population of patients with CS. METHODS AND RESULTS cDPP3 was measured at baseline and after 72 hours in the AdreCizumab against plaCebO in SubjecTs witH cardiogenic sHock (ACCOST-HH) trial. The association of cDPP3 with 30-day mortality and need for organ support was assessed. Median cDPP3 concentration at baseline was 43.2 ng/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.2-74.0 ng/mL) and 77 of the 150 patients (52%) had high cDPP3 over the predefined cutoff of 40 ng/mL. Elevated cDPP3 was associated with higher 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.9), fewer days alive without cardiovascular support (aHR, 3 days [95% CI, 0-24 days] vs aHR, 21 days [95% CI, 5-26 days]; P < .0001) and a greater need for renal replacement therapy (56% vs 22%; P < .0001) and mechanical ventilation (90 vs 74%; P = .04). Patients with a sustained high cDPP3 had a poor prognosis (reference group). In contrast, patients with an initially high but decreasing cDPP3 at 72 hours had markedly lower 30-day mortality (aHR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.084-0.34), comparable with patients with a sustained low cDPP3 (aHR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12-0.41). The need for organ support was markedly decreased in subpopulations with sustained low or decreasing cDPP3. CONCLUSIONS The present study confirms the prognostic value of cDPP3 in a contemporary population of patients with CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Picod
- INSERM UMR-S 942 MASCOT - Paris - Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Hugo Nordin
- INSERM UMR-S 942 MASCOT - Paris - Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Dominik Jarczak
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Zeller
- University Center of Cardiovascular Science, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claire Oddos
- INSERM UMR-S 942 MASCOT - Paris - Cité University, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Antoine Herpain
- Experimental Laboratory of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; St. Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Mebazaa
- INSERM UMR-S 942 MASCOT - Paris - Cité University, Paris, France; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lariboisière - Saint Louis Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Feriel Azibani
- INSERM UMR-S 942 MASCOT - Paris - Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Mahir Karakas
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany; 4TEEN4 Pharmaceuticals Gmbh, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Nair RM, Kumar S, Saleem T, Lee R, Higgins A, Khot UN, Reed GW, Menon V. Impact of Age, Gender, and Body Mass Index on Short-Term Outcomes of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock on Mechanical Circulatory Support. Am J Cardiol 2024; 217:119-126. [PMID: 38382702 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
This single-center, observational study assessed the impact of age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) on temporary mechanical circulatory support. All adult patients admitted to the Cleveland Clinic main campus Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) between December 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, CICU with CS necessitating mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, or venous arterial-extra corporeal membrane oxygenation were retrospectively analyzed for this study. Baseline characteristics and 30-day outcomes were collected through physician-directed chart review. The impact of age, gender, and BMI on 30-day mortality was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyze the survival difference in specific subsets. A total of 393 patients with CS on temporary MCS were admitted to our CICU during the study period. The median age of our cohort was 63 years (interquartile range 54 to 70 years), median BMI was 28.50 kg/m2 (interquartile range 24.62 to 29.72) and 70% (n = 276) were men. In total, 22 patients >80 years had received MCS compared with 372 patients <80 years. Patients >80 years on MCS had significantly higher 30-day mortality compared with those <80 years (81.8% vs 49.3%, p = 0.006). Upon stratifying patients by BMI, 161 (41%) patients were found to have BMI ≥30 kg/m2 whereas 232 (59%) patients had BMI <30 kg/m2. Comparison of 30-day mortality revealed that patients with BMI ≥30 did significantly worse than patients with BMI <30 (59.6% vs 45.3%, p = 0.007). There was no difference in 30-day mortality between men and women. On multivariable logistic regression, both age and BMI had a positive linear relation with adjusted 30-day mortality whereas gender did not have a major effect. Advanced age and higher BMI are independently associated with worse outcomes in patients with CS on MCS. Utilizing a strict selection criterion for patients in CS is pertinent to derive the maximum benefit from advanced mechanical support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raunak M Nair
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sachin Kumar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Talha Saleem
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ran Lee
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Andrew Higgins
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Umesh N Khot
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Grant W Reed
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Venu Menon
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Mergoum AM, Rhone AR, Larson NJ, Dries DJ, Blondeau B, Rogers FB. A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock. J Intensive Care Med 2024:8850666241246230. [PMID: 38613381 DOI: 10.1177/08850666241246230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
Shock is a life-threatening circulatory failure that results in inadequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation. Vasopressors and inotropes are vasoactive medications that are vital in increasing systemic vascular resistance and cardiac contractility, respectively, in patients presenting with shock. To be well versed in using these agents is an important skill to have in the critical care setting where patients can frequently exhibit symptoms of shock. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms of shock and evaluate the current evidence behind the management of shock with an emphasis on vasopressors and inotropes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - David J Dries
- Department of Surgery, Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, MN, USA
| | - Benoit Blondeau
- Department of Surgery, Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
87
|
Williams S, Kalakoutas A, Olusanya S, Schrage B, Tavazzi G, Carnicelli AP, Montero S, Vandenbriele C, Luk A, Lim HS, Bhagra S, Ott SC, Farrero M, Samsky MD, Kennedy JLW, Sen S, Agrawal R, Rampersad P, Coniglio A, Pappalardo F, Barnett C, Proudfoot AG. The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel. Crit Care 2024; 28:105. [PMID: 38566212 PMCID: PMC10988801 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04884-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational data suggest that the subset of patients with heart failure related CS (HF-CS) now predominate critical care admissions for CS. There are no dedicated HF-CS randomised control trials completed to date which reliably inform clinical practice or clinical guidelines. We sought to identify aspects of HF-CS care where both consensus and uncertainty may exist to guide clinical practice and future clinical trial design, with a specific focus on HF-CS due to acute decompensated chronic HF. METHODS A 16-person multi-disciplinary panel comprising of international experts was assembled. A modified RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, appropriateness methodology was used. A survey comprising of 34 statements was completed. Participants anonymously rated the appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 to 9 (1-3 as inappropriate, 4-6 as uncertain and as 7-9 appropriate). RESULTS Of the 34 statements, 20 were rated as appropriate and 14 were rated as inappropriate. Uncertainty existed across all three domains: the initial assessment and management of HF-CS; escalation to temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support (tMCS); and weaning from tMCS in HF-CS. Significant disagreement between experts (deemed present when the disagreement index exceeded 1) was only identified when deliberating the utility of thoracic ultrasound in the immediate management of HF-CS. CONCLUSION This study has highlighted several areas of practice where large-scale prospective registries and clinical trials in the HF-CS population are urgently needed to reliably inform clinical practice and the synthesis of future societal HF-CS guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Williams
- Perioperative Medicine Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Antonis Kalakoutas
- Perioperative Medicine Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Segun Olusanya
- Perioperative Medicine Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Benedict Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Anthony P Carnicelli
- Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Santiago Montero
- Acute Cardiovascular Care Unit, Cardiology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Adriana Luk
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hoong Sern Lim
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sai Bhagra
- Advanced Heart Failure and Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sascha C Ott
- Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Marc D Samsky
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jamie L W Kennedy
- Heart Failure / Transplant Program, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Sounok Sen
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Richa Agrawal
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Amanda Coniglio
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Christopher Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alastair G Proudfoot
- Perioperative Medicine Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK.
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Blumer V, Kanwar MK, Barnett CF, Cowger JA, Damluji AA, Farr M, Goodlin SJ, Katz JN, McIlvennan CK, Sinha SS, Wang TY. Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults: A Focus on Age-Associated Risks and Approach to Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2024; 149:e1051-e1065. [PMID: 38406869 PMCID: PMC11067718 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock continues to portend poor outcomes, conferring short-term mortality rates of 30% to 50% despite recent scientific advances. Age is a nonmodifiable risk factor for mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock and is often considered in the decision-making process for eligibility for various therapies. Older adults have been largely excluded from analyses of therapeutic options in patients with cardiogenic shock. As a result, despite the association of advanced age with worse outcomes, focused strategies in the assessment and management of cardiogenic shock in this high-risk and growing population are lacking. Individual programs oftentimes develop upper age limits for various interventional strategies for their patients, including heart transplantation and durable left ventricular assist devices. However, age as a lone parameter should not be used to guide individual patient management decisions in cardiogenic shock. In the assessment of risk in older adults with cardiogenic shock, a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach is central to developing best practices. In this American Heart Association scientific statement, we aim to summarize our contemporary understanding of the epidemiology, risk assessment, and in-hospital approach to management of cardiogenic shock, with a unique focus on older adults.
Collapse
|
89
|
Réa ABBAC, Mihajlovic V, Vishram-Nielsen JKK, Brahmbhatt DH, Scolari FL, Wang VN, Nisar M, Fung NL, Otsuki M, Billia F, Overgaard CB, Luk A. Pulmonary Artery Catheter Usage and Impact on Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: Results From a Canadian Single-Centre Registry. Can J Cardiol 2024; 40:664-673. [PMID: 38092192 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemodynamic assessment for cardiogenic shock (CS) phenotyping in patients has led to renewed interest in the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs). METHODS We included patients admitted with CS from January 2014 to December 2020 and compared clinical outcomes among patients who received PACs and those who did not. The primary outcome was the rate of in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included use of advanced heart failure therapies and coronary intensive care unit (CICU) and hospital lengths of stay. RESULTS A total of 1043 patients were analysed and 47% received PACs. Patients selected for PAC-guided management were younger and had lower left ventricular function. They also had higher use of vasopressor and inotropes, and 15.2% of them were already supported with temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS). In-hospital mortality was lower in patients who received PACs (29.3% vs 36.2%; P = 0.02), mainly driven by a reduction in mortality among those in Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) stages D and E CS. Patients who received PACs were more likely to receive temporary MCS with Impella, durable ventricular assist devices (VADs), or orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) (P < 0.001 for all analyses). CICU and hospital lengths of stay were longer in patients who used PACs. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with CS, the use of PACs was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, especially among those in SCAI stages D and E. Patients who received PACs were also more frequently rescued with temporary MCS or received advanced heart failure therapies, such as durable VADs or OHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Beatriz B A C Réa
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vesna Mihajlovic
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Darshan H Brahmbhatt
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fernando Luis Scolari
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Vicki N Wang
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mahrukh Nisar
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole L Fung
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Madison Otsuki
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Filio Billia
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher B Overgaard
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adriana Luk
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Garan AR, Kataria R, Li B, Sinha S, Kanwar MK, Hernandez-Montfort J, Li S, Ton VANK, Blumer V, Grandin EW, Harwani N, Zazzali P, Walec KD, Hickey G, Abraham J, Mahr C, Nathan S, Vorovich E, Guglin M, Hall S, Khalife W, Sangal P, Zhang Y, Kim JH, Schwartzman A, Vishnevsky A, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Analysis. J Card Fail 2024; 30:564-575. [PMID: 37820897 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consensus recommendations for cardiogenic shock (CS) advise transfer of patients in need of advanced options beyond the capability of "spoke" centers to tertiary/"hub" centers with higher capabilities. However, outcomes associated with such transfers are largely unknown beyond those reported in individual health networks. OBJECTIVES To analyze a contemporary, multicenter CS cohort with the aim of comparing characteristics and outcomes of patients between transfer (between spoke and hub centers) and nontransfer cohorts (those primarily admitted to a hub center) for both acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and heart failure-related HF-CS. We also aim to identify clinical characteristics of the transfer cohort that are associated with in-hospital mortality. METHODS The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group (CSWG) registry is a national, multicenter, prospective registry including high-volume (mostly hub) CS centers. Fifteen U.S. sites contributed data for this analysis from 2016-2020. RESULTS Of 1890 consecutive CS patients enrolled into the CSWG registry, 1028 (54.4%) patients were transferred. Of these patients, 528 (58.1%) had heart failure-related CS (HF-CS), and 381 (41.9%) had CS related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS). Upon arrival to the CSWG site, transfer patients were more likely to be in SCAI stages C and D, when compared to nontransfer patients. Transfer patients had higher mortality rates (37% vs 29%, < 0.001) than nontransfer patients; the differences were driven primarily by the HF-CS cohort. Logistic regression identified increasing age, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and higher number of vasoactive drugs prior to or within 24 hours after CSWG site transfer as independent predictors of mortality among HF-CS patients. Conversely, pulmonary artery catheter use prior to transfer or within 24 hours of arrival was associated with decreased mortality rates. Among transfer AMI-CS patients, BMI > 28 kg/m2, worsening renal failure, lactate > 3 mg/dL, and increasing numbers of vasoactive drugs were associated with increased mortality rates. CONCLUSION More than half of patients with CS managed at high-volume CS centers were transferred from another hospital. Although transfer patients had higher mortality rates than those who were admitted primarily to hub centers, the outcomes and their predictors varied significantly when classified by HF-CS vs AMI-CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachna Kataria
- Brown University, Lifespan Cardiovascular Center, Providence, RI
| | - Borui Li
- The CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Shashank Sinha
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA
| | - Manreet K Kanwar
- Cardiovascular Institute at Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Song Li
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Vanessa Blumer
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA
| | | | - Neil Harwani
- The CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Peter Zazzali
- The CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Karol D Walec
- The CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Gavin Hickey
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Claudius Mahr
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Maya Guglin
- Indiana University Health Advanced Heart and Lung Care, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Shelley Hall
- Baylor Scott & White Advanced Heart Failure Clinic, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Paavni Sangal
- The CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Yijing Zhang
- The CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Ju H Kim
- Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Navin K Kapur
- The CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Sundermeyer J, Kellner C, Beer BN, Besch L, Dettling A, Bertoldi LF, Blankenberg S, Dauw J, Dindane Z, Eckner D, Eitel I, Graf T, Horn P, Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska J, Kirchhof P, Kluge S, Linke A, Landmesser U, Luedike P, Lüsebrink E, Majunke N, Mangner N, Maniuc O, Möbius-Winkler S, Nordbeck P, Orban M, Pappalardo F, Pauschinger M, Pazdernik M, Proudfoot A, Kelham M, Rassaf T, Scherer C, Schulze PC, Schwinger RHG, Skurk C, Sramko M, Tavazzi G, Thiele H, Villanova L, Morici N, Winzer EB, Westermann D, Schrage B. Sex-related differences in patients presenting with heart failure-related cardiogenic shock. Clin Res Cardiol 2024; 113:612-625. [PMID: 38353681 PMCID: PMC10954943 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-024-02392-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) accounts for a significant proportion of all CS cases. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence on sex-related differences in HF-CS, especially regarding use of treatment and mortality risk in women vs. men. This study aimed to investigate potential differences in clinical presentation, use of treatments, and mortality between women and men with HF-CS. METHODS In this international observational study, patients with HF-CS (without acute myocardial infarction) from 16 tertiary-care centers in five countries were enrolled between 2010 and 2021. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess differences in clinical presentation, use of treatments, and 30-day mortality in women vs. men with HF-CS. RESULTS N = 1030 patients with HF-CS were analyzed, of whom 290 (28.2%) were women. Compared to men, women were more likely to be older, less likely to have a known history of heart failure or cardiovascular risk factors, and lower rates of highly depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and renal dysfunction. Nevertheless, CS severity as well as use of treatments were comparable, and female sex was not independently associated with 30-day mortality (53.0% vs. 50.8%; adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75-1.19). CONCLUSIONS In this large HF-CS registry, sex disparities in risk factors and clinical presentation were observed. Despite these differences, the use of treatments was comparable, and both sexes exhibited similarly high mortality rates. Further research is necessary to evaluate if sex-tailored treatment, accounting for the differences in cardiovascular risk factors and clinical presentation, might improve outcomes in HF-CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Kellner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Cardio Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedikt N Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Besch
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Dettling
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jeroen Dauw
- Department of Cardiology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Zouhir Dindane
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dennis Eckner
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Eitel
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tobias Graf
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Patrick Horn
- Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Joanna Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Axel Linke
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, DHZC Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Luedike
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Enzo Lüsebrink
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Majunke
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Norman Mangner
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Octavian Maniuc
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Nordbeck
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Dept Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS Antonio E Biagio E Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Matthias Pauschinger
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | | | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Matthew Kelham
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Clemens Scherer
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Skurk
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, DHZC Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marek Sramko
- Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pavia Italy, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Luca Villanova
- Unità Di Cure Intensive Cardiologiche and De Gasperis Cardio-Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Nuccia Morici
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi, ONLUS, Santa Maria Nascente, Milan, Italy
| | - Ephraim B Winzer
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Alviar CL, Li BK, Keller NM, Bohula-May E, Barnett C, Berg DD, Burke JA, Chaudhry SP, Daniels LB, DeFilippis AP, Gerber D, Horowitz J, Jentzer JC, Katrapati P, Keeley E, Lawler PR, Park JG, Sinha SS, Snell J, Solomon MA, Teuteberg J, Katz JN, van Diepen S, Morrow DA. Prognostic performance of the IABP-SHOCK II Risk Score among cardiogenic shock subtypes in the critical care cardiology trials network registry. Am Heart J 2024; 270:1-12. [PMID: 38190931 PMCID: PMC11032171 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk stratification has potential to guide triage and decision-making in cardiogenic shock (CS). We assessed the prognostic performance of the IABP-SHOCK II score, derived in Europe for acute myocardial infarct-related CS (AMI-CS), in a contemporary North American cohort, including different CS phenotypes. METHODS The critical care cardiology trials network (CCCTN) coordinated by the TIMI study group is a multicenter network of cardiac intensive care units (CICU). Participating centers annually contribute ≥2 months of consecutive medical CICU admissions. The IABP-SHOCK II risk score includes age > 73 years, prior stroke, admission glucose > 191 mg/dl, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl, lactate > 5 mmol/l, and post-PCI TIMI flow grade < 3. We assessed the risk score across various CS etiologies. RESULTS Of 17,852 medical CICU admissions 5,340 patients across 35 sites were admitted with CS. In patients with AMI-CS (n = 912), the IABP-SHOCK II score predicted a >3-fold gradient in in-hospital mortality (low risk = 26.5%, intermediate risk = 52.2%, high risk = 77.5%, P < .0001; c-statistic = 0.67; Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .79). The score showed a similar gradient of in-hospital mortality in patients with non-AMI-related CS (n = 2,517, P < .0001) and mixed shock (n = 923, P < .001), as well as in left ventricular (<0.0001), right ventricular (P = .0163) or biventricular (<0.0001) CS. The correlation between the IABP-SHOCK II score and SOFA was moderate (r2 = 0.17) and the IABP-SHOCK II score revealed a significant risk gradient within each SCAI stage. CONCLUSIONS In an unselected international multicenter registry of patients admitted with CS, the IABP- SHOCK II score only moderately predicted in-hospital mortality in a broad population of CS regardless of etiology or irrespective of right, left, or bi-ventricular involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos L Alviar
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY;.
| | - Boyangzi K Li
- Division of Cardiology, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Norma M Keller
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Erin Bohula-May
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Christopher Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - David D Berg
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - James A Burke
- Division of Cardiology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA
| | | | - Lori B Daniels
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Daniel Gerber
- Division of Cardiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - James Horowitz
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jacob C Jentzer
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Minnesota, CA
| | | | - Ellen Keeley
- Division of Cardiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Patrick R Lawler
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeong-Gun Park
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Shashank S Sinha
- Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA
| | - Jeffrey Snell
- Division of Cardiology, Rush University, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael A Solomon
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Jason N Katz
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - David A Morrow
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Laghlam D, Benghanem S, Ortuno S, Bouabdallaoui N, Manzo-Silberman S, Hamzaoui O, Aissaoui N. Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care 2024; 14:45. [PMID: 38553663 PMCID: PMC10980676 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01260-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is characterized by low cardiac output and sustained tissue hypoperfusion that may result in end-organ dysfunction and death. CS is associated with high short-term mortality, and its management remains challenging despite recent advances in therapeutic options. Timely diagnosis and multidisciplinary team-based management have demonstrated favourable effects on outcomes. We aimed to review evidence-based practices for managing patients with ischemic and non-ischemic CS, detailing the multi-organ supports needed in this critically ill patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Driss Laghlam
- Research & Innovation Department, RIGHAPH, Service de Réanimation polyvalente, CMC Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, 48 Ter boulevard Victor Hugo, 92200, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
| | - Sarah Benghanem
- Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre & Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AfterROSC, Paris, France
| | - Sofia Ortuno
- Service Médecine intensive-réanimation, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
- Université Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Nadia Bouabdallaoui
- Institut de cardiologie de Montreal, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Stephane Manzo-Silberman
- Université Sorbonne, Paris, France
- Sorbonne University, Institute of Cardiology- Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), ACTION Study Group, Paris, France
| | - Olfa Hamzaoui
- Service de médecine intensive-réanimation polyvalente, Hôpital Robert Debré, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
- Unité HERVI "Hémostase et Remodelage Vasculaire Post-Ischémie" - EA 3801, Reims, France
| | - Nadia Aissaoui
- Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre & Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AfterROSC, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Bilchenko AO, Gritsenko OV, Kolisnyk VO, Rafalyuk OI, Pyzhevskii AV, Myzak YV, Besh DI, Salo VM, Chaichuk SO, Lehoida MO, Danylchuk IV, Polivenok IV. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in Ukraine: multicentre registry analysis 2021-2022. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1377969. [PMID: 38606380 PMCID: PMC11007039 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1377969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Data on the results and management strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in the Low and Lower-Middle Income Countries (LLMICs) are limited. This lack of understanding of the situation partially hinders the development of effective cardiogenic shock treatment programs in this part of the world. Materials and methods The Ukrainian Multicentre Cardiogenic Shock Registry was analyzed, covering patient data from 2021 to 2022 in 6 major Ukrainian reperfusion centres from different parts of the country. Analysis was focusing on outcomes, therapeutic modalities and mortality predictors in AMI-CS patients. Results We analyzed data from 221 consecutive patients with CS from 6 hospitals across Ukraine. The causes of CS were ST-elevated myocardial infarction (85.1%), non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (5.9%), decompensated chronic heart failure (7.7%) and arrhythmia (1.3%), with a total in-hospital mortality rate for CS of 57.1%. The prevalence of CS was 6.3% of all AMI with reperfusion rate of 90.5% for AMI-CS. In 23.5% of cases, CS developed in the hospital after admission. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) utilization was 19.9% using intra-aortic balloon pump alone. Left main stem occlusion, reperfusion deterioration, Charlson Comorbidity Index >4, and cardiac arrest were found to be independent predictors for hospital mortality in AMI-СS. Conclusions Despite the wide adoption of primary percutaneous coronary intervention as the main reperfusion strategy for AMI, СS remains a significant problem in LLMICs, associated with high in-hospital mortality. There is an unmet need for the development and implementation of a nationwide protocol for CS management and the creation of reference CS centers based on the country-wide reperfusion network, equipped with modern technologies for MCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton O. Bilchenko
- Department of Prevention and Treatment of Emergency Conditions, L.T. Malaya Therapy National Institute of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Olga V. Gritsenko
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, V.T. Zaitcev Institute of General and Urgent Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Oleg I. Rafalyuk
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Lviv Regional Clinical Treatment and Diagnostic Cardiology Center, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Andrii V. Pyzhevskii
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Lviv Regional Clinical Treatment and Diagnostic Cardiology Center, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Yaroslav V. Myzak
- Department of Interventional Radiology, 1st Territorial Medical Union, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Dmytro I. Besh
- Department of Interventional Radiology, 1st Territorial Medical Union, Lviv, Ukraine
- Department of Family Medicine, Danylo Halytsky National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Victor M. Salo
- Department of Interventional Radiology, 1st Territorial Medical Union, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Sergii O. Chaichuk
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Oleksandrivska Clinical Hospital, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Mykhailo O. Lehoida
- Department of Cardiology, Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Treatment and Diagnostic Center of Cardiovascular Pathology, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
| | - Ihor V. Danylchuk
- Department of Cardiology, Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Treatment and Diagnostic Center of Cardiovascular Pathology, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
| | - Ihor V. Polivenok
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, V.T. Zaitcev Institute of General and Urgent Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
- Department of Therapy No 1, Kharkiv National Medical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Lüsebrink E, Binzenhöfer L, Hering D, Villegas Sierra L, Schrage B, Scherer C, Speidl WS, Uribarri A, Sabate M, Noc M, Sandoval E, Erglis A, Pappalardo F, De Roeck F, Tavazzi G, Riera J, Roncon-Albuquerque R, Meder B, Luedike P, Rassaf T, Hausleiter J, Hagl C, Zimmer S, Westermann D, Combes A, Zeymer U, Massberg S, Schäfer A, Orban M, Thiele H. Scrutinizing the Role of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Has Clinical Practice Outpaced the Evidence? Circulation 2024; 149:1033-1052. [PMID: 38527130 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.067087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for temporary mechanical circulatory support in various clinical scenarios has been increasing consistently, despite the lack of sufficient evidence regarding its benefit and safety from adequately powered randomized controlled trials. Although the ARREST trial (Advanced Reperfusion Strategies for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation) and a secondary analysis of the PRAGUE OHCA trial (Prague Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) provided some evidence in favor of VA-ECMO in the setting of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the INCEPTION trial (Early Initiation of Extracorporeal Life Support in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) has not found a relevant improvement of short-term mortality with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In addition, the results of the recently published ECLS-SHOCK trial (Extracorporeal Life Support in Cardiogenic Shock) and ECMO-CS trial (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock) discourage the routine use of VA-ECMO in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Ongoing clinical trials (ANCHOR [Assessment of ECMO in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock, NCT04184635], REVERSE [Impella CP With VA ECMO for Cardiogenic Shock, NCT03431467], UNLOAD ECMO [Left Ventricular Unloading to Improve Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on VA-ECMO, NCT05577195], PIONEER [Hemodynamic Support With ECMO and IABP in Elective Complex High-risk PCI, NCT04045873]) may clarify the usefulness of VA-ECMO in specific patient subpopulations and the efficacy of combined mechanical circulatory support strategies. Pending further data to refine patient selection and management recommendations for VA-ECMO, it remains uncertain whether the present usage of this device improves outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enzo Lüsebrink
- Department of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance (E.L., L.B., D.H., L.V.S., C.S., J.H., S.M., M.O.)
| | - Leonhard Binzenhöfer
- Department of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance (E.L., L.B., D.H., L.V.S., C.S., J.H., S.M., M.O.)
| | - Daniel Hering
- Department of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance (E.L., L.B., D.H., L.V.S., C.S., J.H., S.M., M.O.)
| | - Laura Villegas Sierra
- Department of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance (E.L., L.B., D.H., L.V.S., C.S., J.H., S.M., M.O.)
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Germany and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany (B.S.)
| | - Clemens Scherer
- Department of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance (E.L., L.B., D.H., L.V.S., C.S., J.H., S.M., M.O.)
| | - Walter S Speidl
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (W.S.S.)
| | - Aitor Uribarri
- Cardiology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. CIBER-CV (A.U.)
| | - Manel Sabate
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Clinic, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Spain (M.S.)
| | - Marko Noc
- Center for Intensive Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia (M.N.)
| | - Elena Sandoval
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain (E.S.)
| | - Andrejs Erglis
- Latvian Centre of Cardiology, Paul Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia (A.E.)
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AO SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Frederic De Roeck
- Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium (F.D.R.)
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Italy (G.T.)
| | - Jordi Riera
- Intensive Care Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, and SODIR, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain (J.R.)
| | - Roberto Roncon-Albuquerque
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, São João University Hospital Center, UnIC@RISE and Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Porto, Portugal (R.R.-A.)
| | - Benjamin Meder
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany (B.M.)
| | - Peter Luedike
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen (P.L., T.R.)
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen (P.L., T.R.)
| | - Jörg Hausleiter
- Department of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance (E.L., L.B., D.H., L.V.S., C.S., J.H., S.M., M.O.)
| | - Christian Hagl
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Germany (C.H.)
| | - Sebastian Zimmer
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Heart Center Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Germany (S.Z.)
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany (D.W.)
| | - Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France, and Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France (A.C.)
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen and Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany (U.Z.)
| | - Steffen Massberg
- Department of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance (E.L., L.B., D.H., L.V.S., C.S., J.H., S.M., M.O.)
| | - Andreas Schäfer
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Germany (A.S.)
| | - Martin Orban
- Department of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance (E.L., L.B., D.H., L.V.S., C.S., J.H., S.M., M.O.)
| | - Holger Thiele
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Science, Germany (H.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Choi KH, Kang D, Lee J, Park H, Park TK, Lee JM, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Cho J, Yang JH. Association between intensive care unit nursing grade and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock and its cost-effectiveness. Crit Care 2024; 28:99. [PMID: 38523296 PMCID: PMC10962168 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04880-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the high workload of cardiac intensive care unit (ICU), there is a paucity of evidence on the association between nurse workforce and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the ICU nursing grade on mortality and cost-effectiveness in CS. METHODS A nationwide analysis was performed using the K-NHIS database. Patients diagnosed with CS and admitted to the ICU at tertiary hospitals were enrolled. ICU nursing grade was defined according to the bed-to-nurse ratio: grade1 (bed-to-nurse ratio < 0.5), grade2 (0.5 ≤ bed-to-nurse ratio < 0.63), and grade3 (0.63 ≤ bed-to-nurse ratio < 0.77) or above. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Cost-effective analysis was also performed. RESULTS Of the 72,950 patients with CS, 27,216 (37.3%) were in ICU nursing grade 1, 29,710 (40.7%) in grade 2, and 16,024 (22.0%) in grade ≥ 3. The adjusted-OR for in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with grade 2 (grade 1 vs. grade 2, 30.6% vs. 37.5%, adjusted-OR 1.14, 95% CI1.09-1.19) and grade ≥ 3 (40.6%) with an adjusted-OR of 1.29 (95% CI 1.23-1.36) than those with grade 1. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of grade1 compared with grade 2 and ≥ 3 was $25,047/year and $42,888/year for hospitalization and $5151/year and $5269/year for 1-year follow-up, suggesting that grade 1 was cost-effective. In subgroup analysis, the beneficial effects of the high-intensity nursing grade on mortality were more prominent in patients who received CPR or multiple vasopressors usage. CONCLUSIONS For patients with CS, ICU grade 1 with a high-intensity nursing staff was associated with reduced mortality and more cost-effectiveness during hospitalization compared to grade 2 and grade ≥ 3, and its beneficial effects were more pronounced in subjects at high risk of CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Hong Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Danbee Kang
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Lee
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyejeong Park
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Taek Kyu Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Myung Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Bin Song
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo-Yong Hahn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Hyuk Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Juhee Cho
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jeong Hoon Yang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Senman B, Jentzer JC, Barnett CF, Bartos JA, Berg DD, Chih S, Drakos SG, Dudzinski DM, Elliott A, Gage A, Horowitz JM, Miller PE, Sinha SS, Tehrani BN, Yuriditsky E, Vallabhajosyula S, Katz JN. Need for a Cardiogenic Shock Team Collaborative-Promoting a Team-Based Model of Care to Improve Outcomes and Identify Best Practices. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e031979. [PMID: 38456417 PMCID: PMC11009990 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock continues to carry a high mortality rate despite contemporary care, with no breakthrough therapies shown to improve survival over the past few decades. It is a time-sensitive condition that commonly results in cardiovascular complications and multisystem organ failure, necessitating multidisciplinary expertise. Managing patients with cardiogenic shock remains challenging even in well-resourced settings, and an important subgroup of patients may require cardiac replacement therapy. As a result, the idea of leveraging the collective cognitive and procedural proficiencies of multiple providers in a collaborative, team-based approach to care (the "shock team") has been advocated by professional societies and implemented at select high-volume clinical centers. A slowly maturing evidence base has suggested that cardiogenic shock teams may improve patient outcomes. Although several registries exist that are beginning to inform care, particularly around therapeutic strategies of pharmacologic and mechanical circulatory support, none of these are currently focused on the shock team approach, multispecialty partnership, education, or process improvement. We propose the creation of a Cardiogenic Shock Team Collaborative-akin to the successful Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Consortium-with a goal to promote sharing of care protocols, education of stakeholders, and discovery of how process and performance may influence patient outcomes, quality, resource consumption, and costs of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christopher F. Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Jason A. Bartos
- Department of Medicine‐Cardiovascular DivisionUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMNUSA
| | - David D. Berg
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | | | - Stavros G. Drakos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training InstituteUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUTUSA
| | | | - Andrea Elliott
- Department of Medicine‐Cardiovascular DivisionUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMNUSA
| | - Ann Gage
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineCentennial Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - James M. Horowitz
- Division of CardiologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
| | - P. Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Shashank S. Sinha
- Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical CampusFalls ChurchVAUSA
| | - Behnam N. Tehrani
- Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical CampusFalls ChurchVAUSA
| | - Eugene Yuriditsky
- Division of CardiologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
- Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Lifespan Cardiovascular InstituteProvidenceRIUSA
| | - Jason N. Katz
- Division of CardiologyNYU Grossman School of Medicine & Bellevue Hospital CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Mihu MR, Swant LV, Schoaps RS, Johnson C, El Banayosy A. A Survey to Quantify the Number and Structure of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Retrieval Programs in the United States. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1725. [PMID: 38541950 PMCID: PMC10971712 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents a potentially lifesaving support for respiratory and/or circulatory failure but its availability is limited to larger medical centers. A well-organized regional ECMO center with remote cannulation and retrieval ability can offer this intervention to patients treated at hospitals without ECMO. Information regarding the number and structure of ECMO retrieval programs in the United States is limited and there are no data regarding the size and structure of existing programs and which physician specialists perform cannulations and provide management. (2) Methods: We created a survey of 12 questions that was sent out to all adult US ECMO programs registered in the ELSO database. The data for the study were collected through an online survey instrument that was developed in Survey Monkey (Monkey Headquarters, Portland, OR). (3) Results: Approximately half of the centers that received the survey responded: 136 out of 274 (49.6%). Sixty-three centers (46%) have an ECMO retrieval program; 58 of these offer both veno-arterial (V-A) and veno-venous (V-V) ECMO, while 5 programs offer V-V ECMO rescue only. Thirty-three (52%) centers perform less than 10 ECMO retrievals per year, and only five (8%) hospitals can perform more than 50 ECMO rescues per year. Cardiothoracic surgeons perform the majority of the ECMO cannulations during retrievals in 30 programs (48%), followed by intensivists in eight (13%) programs and cardiologists in three (5%) centers. (4) Conclusions: Many ECMO centers offer ECMO retrievals; however, only a minority of the programs perform a large number of rescues per year. These cannulations are primarily performed by cardiothoracic surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mircea R. Mihu
- Specialty Critical Care, Advanced Cardiac Care and Acute Circulatory Support, Nazih Zuhdi Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA
- Department of Medicine, Oklahoma State University Health Science Center, Tulsa, OK 74077, USA
| | - Laura V. Swant
- Specialty Critical Care, Advanced Cardiac Care and Acute Circulatory Support, Nazih Zuhdi Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA
| | - Robert S. Schoaps
- Specialty Critical Care, Advanced Cardiac Care and Acute Circulatory Support, Nazih Zuhdi Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA
| | - Caroline Johnson
- Specialty Critical Care, Advanced Cardiac Care and Acute Circulatory Support, Nazih Zuhdi Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA
| | - Aly El Banayosy
- Specialty Critical Care, Advanced Cardiac Care and Acute Circulatory Support, Nazih Zuhdi Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA
- Department of Medicine, Oklahoma State University Health Science Center, Tulsa, OK 74077, USA
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Jang WJ, Park IH, Oh JH, Choi KH, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Ahn CM, Yu CW, Kim HJ, Bae JW, Kwon SU, Lee HJ, Lee WS, Jeong JO, Park SD, Yang JH. Efficacy and safety of durable versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6301. [PMID: 38491111 PMCID: PMC10943207 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56925-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The clinical impact of different polymer technologies in newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remains poorly understood. We investigated the efficacy and safety of durable polymer DESs (DP-DESs) compared with biodegradable polymer DESs (BP-DESs). A total of 620 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with newer-generation DESs for AMI complicated by CS was divided into two groups based on polymer technology: the DP-DES group (n = 374) and the BP-DES group (n = 246). The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) during a 12-month follow-up, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Both the DP-DES and BP-DES groups exhibited low stent thrombosis rates (1.3% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.660). The risk of TVF did not significantly differ between the two groups (34.2% vs. 28.5%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-1.29, p = 0.721). This finding remained consistent after adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting (28.1% vs. 25.1%, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77-1.27, p = 0.899). In AMI patients complicated by CS, the risk of a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization was not significantly different between those treated with DP-DESs and those treated with BP-DESs.Trial registration: RESCUE registry, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02985008 , NCT02985008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Jin Jang
- Division of Cardiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ik Hyun Park
- Department of Cardiology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju Hyeon Oh
- Department of Cardiology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Hong Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Bin Song
- Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo-Yong Hahn
- Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Hyuk Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
- Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul-Min Ahn
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheol Woong Yu
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Joong Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jang-Whan Bae
- Division of Cardiology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Uk Kwon
- Division of Cardiology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, University of Inje College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Jong Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Wang Soo Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Ok Jeong
- Division of Cardiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Don Park
- Division of Cardiology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Hoon Yang
- Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Mehta A, Vavilin I, Nguyen AH, Batchelor WB, Blumer V, Cilia L, Dewanjee A, Desai M, Desai SS, Flanagan MC, Isseh IN, Kennedy JLW, Klein KM, Moukhachen H, Psotka MA, Raja A, Rosner CM, Shah P, Tang DG, Truesdell AG, Tehrani BN, Sinha SS. Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1354158. [PMID: 38545346 PMCID: PMC10965643 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1354158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a time-sensitive and hemodynamically complex syndrome with a broad spectrum of etiologies and clinical presentations. Despite contemporary therapies, CS continues to maintain high morbidity and mortality ranging from 35 to 50%. More recently, burgeoning observational research in this field aimed at enhancing the early recognition and characterization of the shock state through standardized team-based protocols, comprehensive hemodynamic profiling, and tailored and selective utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices has been associated with improved outcomes. In this narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiology of CS, novel phenotypes, evolving definitions and staging systems, currently available pharmacologic and device-based therapies, standardized, team-based management protocols, and regionalized systems-of-care aimed at improving shock outcomes. We also explore opportunities for fertile investigation through randomized and non-randomized studies to address the prevailing knowledge gaps that will be critical to improving long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Mehta
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Ilan Vavilin
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Andrew H. Nguyen
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Wayne B. Batchelor
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Vanessa Blumer
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Lindsey Cilia
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Virginia Heart, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Aditya Dewanjee
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Mehul Desai
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Shashank S. Desai
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Michael C. Flanagan
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Iyad N. Isseh
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Jamie L. W. Kennedy
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Katherine M. Klein
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Hala Moukhachen
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Mitchell A. Psotka
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Anika Raja
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Carolyn M. Rosner
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Palak Shah
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Daniel G. Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Alexander G. Truesdell
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Virginia Heart, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Behnam N. Tehrani
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Shashank S. Sinha
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|