Impact of invasive and noninvasive quantitative culture sampling on outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a pilot study

Ventilator-associated pneumonia: a review

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most frequent intensive-care-unit (ICU)-acquired infection, with an incidence ranging from 6 to 52% [1,2,3,4]. Several studies have shown that critically ill patients are at high risk for getting such nosocomial infections [3,4]. VAP continues to be a major cause of morbidity, mortality and increased financial burden in ICUs [5,6,7,8]. Over the years there has been a significant advance in our understanding of ventilator associated pneumonia. This article reviews the various aspects of VAP such as definition, risk factors, etiological agents, diagnosis, treatment and prevention with emphasis on the recent advances.

The Problems Diagnosing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common healthcare-associated infection in the intensive care unit. Clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria are used to make the diagnosis, but there is no consensus definition, as no individual criterion or combination of criteria offer sufficient diagnostic accuracy to support their sole use in defining VAP. Neither invasive bronchoscopic sampling nor less invasive quantitative tracheal aspirate, conveys an advantage when making the microbiological diagnosis of VAP. Of the scoring systems and definitions presently in use, the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) has been shown to be prone to inter-observer variability; the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definition relies heavily on subjective clinical criteria, and the Hospitals in Europe Link for Infection Control through Surveillance (HELICS) criteria employ similarly subjective clinical criteria with five different possibilities for microbiological diagnosis. The use of these different diagnostic methods leads to marked variation in the reported incidence of VAP. Clinical practice requires an objective and transferable definition for VAP so that we can improve the reporting, monitoring and treatment of VAP.

Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is difficult to diagnose. Recent data suggest quantitative endotracheal aspirate (ETA) may be noninferior diagnostically to quantitative bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). We hypothesized this would be the case.

METHODS

Blind quantitative ETA and BAL were performed on 150 consecutive ventilated patients with suspected VAP in a prospective single-centre medical intensive care unit study over a 2-year inclusion period. Patients were either antibiotic-naive or antibiotic-free for 72 hours. Diagnostic yield, Gram stain and culture results, and impact on antibiotic therapy were assessed. The independent impact of a positive BAL or ETA result on ventilator settings and 28-day mortality was calculated. The BAL/ETA safety was assessed hemodynamically.

RESULTS

Bronchoalveolar lavage had significantly higher diagnostic yield (49.3% vs 34.0%, P = .01), more frequent impact on antibiotic therapy (usually de-escalation) (48.0% vs 32.7%, P = .01), and greater sensitivity (64.1% vs 42.6%, P = .0003) than ETA. There was moderate intertest agreement and no difference in specificity and positive and negative predictive values. A positive BAL or ETA result did not independently alter the frequency of ventilator changes or 28-day mortality. Both procedures were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative BAL is safe and has greater diagnostic utility than ETA for VAP facilitates de-escalation. This study provides support for quantitative BAL in VAP diagnosis.

Ventilator-associated infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most serious and controversial of the infections of the critically ill patient. The accuracy of standard methods of diagnosis remains under constant scrutiny, and at the same time there is increasing debate about whether it is a preventable disease. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of respiratory tract infection in the ventilated patient, and how the latest advances have grown from our current understanding of its pathogenesis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from many recent investigations have focused on the role of proximal airway infection, ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT), in respiratory tract infection. The goals of recent trials include reducing the morbidity associated with the progression of airway colonization to VAT or with the progression of VAT to VAP. Continuous subglottic secretion suctioning, innovative types of endotracheal tubes and targeted therapy for VAT in recent investigations have shown promise in improving clinical outcomes in the critically ill patient. However, even with diligent attention to all the modifiable risk factors for respiratory infection, complete elimination of VAT and VAP remains unlikely. As long as a patient requires an endotracheal tube that disturbs airway integrity, host defenses will be impaired, and resistant virulent organisms that result from our liberal use of systemic antibiotics will continue to challenge critical care specialists.

SUMMARY

This review will focus on: the current understanding of the pathogenesis of VAT and VAP, modifiable risk factors and new approaches to treatment, and bacterial resistance challenges.

Evaluation of a 24-hour emergency bronchoscopy service in a tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND

Flexible bronchoscopy has become an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool for the management of patients with various diseases of the chest. Availability of a 24-hour bronchoscopy service equipped with experienced personnel is becoming increasingly important especially for intensive care patients. However, such services have been implemented only in a few medical centres. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usage of a 24-hour emergency service in a large university hospital with a 1 year prospective analysis of emergency bronchoscopy service in a tertiary care centre.

METHODS

Frequencies, indications and efficiency of therapeutic interventions were evaluated after each bronchoscopy using a specially designed questionnaire. All bronchoscopies were performed as emergency procedures out of operational schedule. A total of 614 emergency bronchoscopies were performed, 88% of them in intensive care units.

RESULTS

The vast majority (84.5%) of the procedures were necessary for therapeutic interventions; that is, atelectasis, airway secretion, aspiration or bronchopulmonary bleeding. According to prespecified criteria, 37.6% (n = 195) of therapeutic procedures were assessed as 'very helpful' and 3.9% (n = 20) as 'life saving'. Diagnostic bronchoscopies were performed mainly to collect airway material for microbiological evaluations in immunocompromised patients. In these cases, the diagnostic yield was approximately 50%.

CONCLUSION

The availability of a 24-hour bronchoscopy service has been found to improve patient care and was occasionally considered life saving. Thus, comparable services should be made more widely available.

[Ventilator-associated pneumonia]

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common nosocomial infection in critical care medicine and has been shown to be an independent risk factor for mortality. However, ventilator induced lung injury itself is probably only a minor factor predisposing to VAP. In contrast, invasive ventilation using an endotracheal tube is obviously a more important measure. Thus, microaspiration of potentially infectious secretion from the oropharynx into the trachea along the tube has been suggested to be the most critical pathophysiological event in the process of VAP development. Accordingly, non-invasive ventilation provides a decreased risk of VAP. Therefore, all measures aimed at averting microaspiration or shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation are appropriate to prevent VAP. Moreover, oropharyngeal decontamination may be helpful by reducing bacterial colonisation. Effectiveness of therapy depends on early treatment and therefore requires early diagnosis. With this aim combined clinical, radiologic, and microbiological parameters should be taken into account. Adequate antimicrobial therapy in due consideration for individual risk factors and local antibiotic resistance is the most important therapeutic measure.

Antibiotic management of sepsis: current concepts

BACKGROUND

The development of guidelines for sepsis management has improved disease survival and reduced treatment costs. Adequate antibiotic therapy is the cornerstone of sepsis treatment. Specific rules should be established in every institution according to its profiles.

OBJECTIVES

To review the current knowledge about the best drugs to be used as empiric treatment for sepsis based on their clinical efficacy and costs.

METHODS

Medline 1950 - 2008 was searched using the following terms: sepsis, organ failure, system failure, SIRS, septic shock, antibiotic, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, urosepsis, catheter-related infection, bloodstream, abdominal infection, and surgical wound.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

For most septic shock patients, monotherapy is adequate and treatment should be initiated in the first hour after first sepsis-induced organ dysfunction. The drug of choice varies in different situations and choosing the right antibiotic enables better survival, fewer complications and shorter stays in intensive care.

Management of nosocomial pneumonia on a medical ward: a comparative study of outcomes and costs of invasive procedures

The goal of this study was to compare outcomes and costs of two management strategies for non-ventilator-associated nosocomial pneumonia (NP) in a medical ward. In this single-centre study, NP patients (n = 68) were randomized to receive non-invasive management (NIM) with immediate empirical antibiotic treatment (n = 34), or invasive management (IM) based on protected brush sampling of specimens (n = 34). The economic analysis adopted the hospital's perspective and took into account only direct costs. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two patient groups. The most frequently isolated organisms were Staphylococcus (25.4%), Streptococcus (23.7%) and Pseudomonas (18.6%) species. The 28-day clinical cure rate did not differ notably between the two groups (NIM, 79.4%; IM, 73.5%). Mortality at 28 days tended to be lower in the NIM group (10.0% vs. 21.8%). Mean antibiotic costs were lower in the IM group (euro194 +/- 355 vs. euro300 +/- 335, p <0.001) but overall management costs were similar (respectively, euro367 +/- 355 and euro346 +/- 363 in the IM and NIM groups, p = 0.08). With respect to both outcome and cost, this study does not support routine management of NP in medical wards using invasive procedures.

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia; A Concise Review

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) continues to be the most common nosocomial infection in critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation. In this review data was sourced from Medline, the National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness (NICE), study authors and review articles. Development of VAP prolongs length of stay in the intensive care unit and may increase mortality. Although diagnosis is difficult, with little consensus on ideal diagnostic criteria, there is general agreement that rapid and accurate diagnosis of VAP is essential as delayed administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy increases mortality. Implementation of evidence-based strategies for the prevention of VAP may reduce morbidity, mortality and length of stay.

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia: the role of endotracheal aspirate surveillance cultures

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate antibacterial treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens is associated with increased mortality. Endotracheal aspirate (ETA) surveillance cultures potentially identify MDR pathogens, particularly MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, resulting in improved selection of therapy in patients who subsequently develop VAP.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of ETA surveillance cultures in the identification of MDR P. aeruginosa in newly intubated adults who subsequently develop VAP.

METHODS

Daily ETA surveillance cultures for P. aeruginosa were collected in all adults newly intubated for 48 hours or more. Patients with preexisting lung disease or colonization or infection with P. aeruginosa were excluded. Risk factors and outcomes of patients newly colonized with MDR P. aeruginosa were assessed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients newly colonized with P. aeruginosa were identified. Twenty (27%) of these patients were colonized with a P. aeruginosa isolate that was MDR (resistant to > or = 3 classes of antibiotics). Six patients were colonized by an isolate resistant to all tested classes of antibiotics. Forty-five percent of patients colonized with MDR P. aeruginosa subsequently developed VAP. Prior receipt of fluoroquinolones was an independent predictor of colonization with MDR P. aeruginosa (OR 11.82; 95% CI 2.10 to 66.46; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of routine surveillance cultures may aid in the early detection of MDR P. aeruginosa, improving the initiation of early and appropriate antibiotic therapy for patients who subsequently develop VAP.

The utility of the clinical pulmonary infection score

The most common infectious complication in critically ill patients is ventilator-associated pneumonia. Ventilator-associated pneumonia has significant morbidity and mortality, prolongs mechanical ventilation, and extends length of hospitalization. Despite its prevalence and impact, uniform diagnostic standards are lacking. The Centers for Disease Control, American Thoracic Society, and Infectious Diseases Society of America have recommended focus on improving preventive measures, establishing widely available and accurate diagnostic tools, and improving ventilator-associated pneumonia management with length of therapy guidelines. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence supporting the clinical pulmonary infection score as an adjunct to distinguish and detect clinically relevant ventilator-associated pneumonia and its use to guide length of therapy. This score combines clinical diagnostic criteria (tracheal secretion quantification and body temperature) with routinely obtained laboratory data (white blood cell count and oxygenation parameters), radiographic data, and bacteriological culture results. Limitations of clinical pulmonary infection score will be discussed.

Quantitative versus qualitative cultures of respiratory secretions for clinical outcomes in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common infectious disease in intensive care units (ICUs). The best diagnostic approach to resolve this condition remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether quantitative cultures of respiratory secretions are effective in reducing mortality in immunocompetent patients with VAP, compared with qualitative cultures. We also considered changes in antibiotic use, length of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, issue 4), which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialized Register; MEDLINE (1966 to December 2007); EMBASE (1974 to December 2007); and LILACS (1982 to December 2007).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing respiratory samples processed quantitatively or qualitatively, obtained by invasive or non-invasive methods from immunocompetent patients with VAP, and which analyzed the impact of these methods on antibiotic use and mortality rates.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed and selected trials from the search results, and assessed studies for suitability, methodology and quality. We analyzed data using Review Manager software. We pooled the included studies to yield the risk ratio (RR) for mortality and antibiotic change with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 3931 references identified from the electronic databases, five RCTs (1367 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared invasive methods using quantitative cultures versus non-invasive methods using qualitative cultures, and were used to answer the main objective of this review. The other two studies compared invasive versus non-invasive methods, both using quantitative cultures. All five studies were combined to compare invasive versus non-invasive interventions for diagnosing VAP. The studies that compared quantitative and qualitative cultures (1240 patients) showed no statistically significant differences in mortality rates (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.11). The analysis of all five RCTs showed there was no evidence of mortality reduction in the invasive group versus the non-invasive group (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.11). There were no significant differences between the interventions with respect to the number of days on mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay or antibiotic change.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that the use of quantitative cultures of respiratory secretions results in reduced mortality, reduced time in ICU and on mechanical ventilation, or higher rates of antibiotic change when compared to qualitative cultures in patients with VAP. Similar results were observed when invasive strategies were compared with non-invasive strategies.

Evidence-based algorithms for diagnosing and treating ventilator-associated pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is widely recognized as a serious and common complication associated with high morbidity and high costs. Given the complexity of caring for heterogeneous populations in the intensive care unit (ICU), however, there is still uncertainty regarding how to diagnose and manage VAP.

OBJECTIVE

We recently conducted a national collaborative aimed at reducing health care-associated infections in ICUs of hospitals operated by the Hospital Corporation of America (HCA). As part of this collaborative, we developed algorithms for diagnosing and treating VAP in mechanically ventilated patients. In the current article, we (1) review the current evidence for diagnosing VAP, (2) describe our approach for developing these algorithms, and (3) illustrate the utility of the diagnostic algorithms using clinical teaching cases.

DESIGN

This was a descriptive study, using data from a national collaborative focused on reducing VAP and catheter-related bloodstream infections.

SETTING

The setting of the study was 110 ICUs at 61 HCA hospitals.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We assembled an interdisciplinary team that included infectious disease specialists, intensivists, hospitalists, statisticians, critical care nurses, and pharmacists. After reviewing published studies and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention VAP guidelines, the team iteratively discussed the evidence, achieved consensus, and ultimately developed these practical algorithms. The diagnostic algorithms address infant, pediatric, immunocompromised, and adult ICU patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We present practical algorithms for diagnosing and managing VAP in mechanically ventilated patients. These algorithms may provide evidence-based real-time guidance to clinicians seeking a standardized approach to diagnosing and managing this challenging problem.

Impact of inappropriate antibiotic therapy on mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and blood stream infection: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Studies have found that initial treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and blood stream infections (BSI) with inappropriate antimicrobial therapy is associated with higher rates of mortality, but additional studies have failed to confirm this.

METHODS

Databases were searched to identify studies that met the following criteria: observational trials, patients with VAP or BSI receiving appropriate and inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, and mortality data. We conducted random-effects model meta-analyses, both with and without adjustment.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses of VAP studies using unadjusted and adjusted data indicated that inappropriate therapy significantly increased patients' odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-3.63; P = .0001, I 2 = 28.5% and OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.12-8.19; P = .0292, I 2 = 89.2%, respectively). Meta-analyses of BSI studies using unadjusted and adjusted data showed that inappropriate therapy significantly increased patients' odds of mortality (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.96-2.76; P < .0001, I 2 = 48.7% and OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.43-3.65; P = .0006, I 2 = 88.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be an association between initial inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and increased mortality in patients with VAP and BSI.

Comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in ventilated critically ill patients. Despite a large amount of research evidence, the optimal diagnostic and treatment strategies for VAP remain controversial.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of VAP. Data sources include Medline, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Register of Controlled Trials.

STUDY SELECTION

The authors systematically searched for all relevant randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of VAP in mechanically ventilated adults that were published from 1980 to October 1, 2006.

DATA EXTRACTION

Independently and in duplicate, the panel critically appraised each published trial. The effect size, confidence intervals, and homogeneity of the results were scored using predefined definitions. The full guideline development panel arrived at a consensus for scores on safety, feasibility, and economic issues.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Based on the scores for each topic, the following statements of recommendation were used: recommend, consider, do not recommend, and no recommendation because of insufficient or conflicting evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

For the diagnosis of VAP in immunocompetent patients, we recommend that endotracheal aspirates with nonquantitative cultures be used as the initial diagnostic strategy. When there is a suspicion of VAP, we recommend empiric antimicrobial therapy (in contrast to delayed or culture directed therapy) and appropriate single agent antimicrobial therapy for each potential pathogen as empiric therapy for VAP. Choice of antibiotics should be based on patient factors and local resistance patterns. We recommend that an antibiotic discontinuation strategy be used in patients who are treated of suspected VAP. For patients who receive adequate initial antibiotic therapy, we recommend 8 days of antibiotic therapy. We do not recommend nebulized endotracheal tobramycin or intratracheal instillation of tobramycin for the treatment of VAP.

CONCLUSION

We present evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of VAP. Implementation of these recommendations into clinical practice may lessen the morbidity and mortality of patients who develop VAP.

[Diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. Recommendations of the Endoscopy Working Group of the French Society of Pulmonary Medicine]

These guidelines on flexible bronchoscopy depict important clues to be known and taken into account while practicing flexible bronchoscopy, in adult, except in emergency situations. This is a practical clarification. Safety conditions, complications, anesthesia, infectious risks, cleaning and disinfection are detailed from a review of the literature. Intensive care practice of bronchoscopy requires more attention due to higher risks patients and is discussed extensively. Standards and performances of the various sampling techniques complete this work. Indications for bronchoscopy, therapeutic and paediatric bronchoscopy are not covered in these guidelines.

Surveillance culture utility and safety using low-volume blind bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surveillance cultures may improve the prediction of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and empirical antibiotic selection. This study examined the utility and patient safety of blind, non-protected, low-volume mini-bronchial lavage (BM-BAL) surveillance cultures in predicting VAP.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective, cohort study was performed in a large general intensive care unit. BM-BALs were collected within 12 h of admission then thrice weekly. Each BM-BAL was screened by Gram staining for intracellular organisms and then quantitatively cultured. VAP was diagnosed using the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score. The concordance for isolates from the BM-BAL was assessed against concurrently collected endotracheal aspirates (EA).

RESULTS

Four hundred and twelve patients requiring a minimum of 48 h of mechanical ventilation were enrolled. Fifty patients developed 58 episodes of VAP. Concordant pathogens were found in 85% of BM-BAL specimens collected 2 days prior to VAP onset. Their antibiograms were stable over the preceding 4 days. The isolation of pathogens with colony counts >or=10(4) cfu/mL from BM-BAL performed 2 days prior to the clinical onset of VAP had a sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 50%, positive predictive value of 31% and a negative predictive value of 93% for predicting the development of VAP. BM-BAL WCC, quantification of bacterial growth and the percentage of intracellular organisms were not helpful in predicting VAP diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

BM-BAL surveillance cultures are well tolerated and useful in predicting the pathogens and their antibiograms causing VAP. Diagnostic specimen collection at the time of VAP onset is still required as surveillance cultures may be negative even one day prior to VAP onset.

Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the UK: report of the working party on hospital-acquired pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

These evidence-based guidelines have been produced after a systematic literature review of a range of issues involving prevention, diagnosis and treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). Prevention is structured into sections addressing general issues, equipment, patient procedures and the environment, whereas in treatment, the structure addresses the use of antimicrobials in prevention and treatment, adjunctive therapies and the application of clinical protocols. The sections dealing with diagnosis are presented against the clinical, radiological and microbiological diagnosis of HAP. Recommendations are also made upon the role of invasive sampling and quantitative microbiology of respiratory secretions in directing antibiotic therapy in HAP/ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Is bronchoalveolar lavage with quantitative cultures a useful tool for diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia?

The results of a recently published Canadian study suggest that bronchoalveolar lavage and endotracheal aspiration are associated with similar clinical outcomes and similar overall use of antibiotics in critically ill patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The study, however, does not provide convincing information on the best strategy to diagnose VAP, to accurately choose initial treatment and to exclude VAP in order to avoid administering antibiotics to patients without bacterial infection. In fact, this trial has several limitations or drawbacks: patients at risk for developing VAP due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were excluded, far from the real-life scenario; a significant number of patients were receiving recent antimicrobial therapy at the time of sampling, with, consequently, difficult-to-interpret culture results; randomization of included patients for initial treatment – meropenem plus ciprofloxacin or meropenem alone – resulted in a high rate of inappropriate initial empirical therapy due to the absence of customization to local epidemiology; and the initial decision to treat and the re-evaluation at day 3 were, in fact, based on clinical judgment and not on direct examination and quantitative culture results. In summary, because antimicrobial treatment was initiated in all suspected patients and was rarely withheld in patients with negative cultures, the study does not suggest an appropriate strategy for improving the use of antibiotics in intensive care unit patients. Such a strategy has two requirements: immediate administration of adequate therapy in patients with true VAP, and avoidance of administering antibiotics in patients without bacterial infection.

Management of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

Pneumonia is the most important respiratory infection in mechanically ventilated patients. It is defined as the presence of microorganisms in the pulmonary parenchyma leading to the development of an inflammatory response by the host, which may be localized in the lung or may extend systemically. Nosocomial pneumonia is an infectious process which develops within 48 hours after admission to the hospital and that was not incubating at the time of hospitalization. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is considered as a subgroup of nosocomial pneumonia and is an infectious pulmonary process which develops 48 hours after the presence of an artificial airway and mechanical ventilation. Since a large proportion of the patients who develop nosocomial pneumonia are intubated and receive mechanical ventilation, most epidemiological and clinical studies on nosocomial pneumonia have been focused on critically ill patients and those receiving mechanical ventilation. From a clinical point of view, nosocomial pneumonia is of great importance not only because of the consequences of the important morbidity and mortality but also due to the high costs associated with development of this disease.

Management of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

Pneumonia is the most important respiratory infection in mechanically ventilated patients. It is defined as the presence of microorganisms in the pulmonary parenchyma leading to the development of an inflammatory response by the host, which may be localized in the lung or may extend systemically. Nosocomial pneumonia is an infectious process which develops within 48 hours after admission to the hospital and that was not incubating at the time of hospitalization. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is considered as a subgroup of nosocomial pneumonia and is an infectious pulmonary process which develops 48 hours after the presence of an artificial airway and mechanical ventilation. Since a large proportion of the patients who develop nosocomial pneumonia are intubated and receive mechanical ventilation, most epidemiological and clinical studies on nosocomial pneumonia have been focused on critically ill patients and those receiving mechanical ventilation. From a clinical point of view, nosocomial pneumonia is of great importance not only because of the consequences of the important morbidity and mortality but also due to the high costs associated with development of this disease.

Diagnosis, management and prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the UK

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ventilator-associated pneumonia is a nosocomial infection that occurs in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for >48 h. Many aspects of its diagnosis, treatment and management are controversial. We used a postal questionnaire to survey current practice within the UK.

METHODS

Questionnaire study of 207 general intensive care units in the UK.

RESULTS

The response rate was 77.3%. Regarding diagnosis, 30% of units obtained specimens from the lungs invasively, while the remainder relied on tracheal aspirates. In only 28.2% of units using tracheal aspirates were results reported in a quantitative manner. A clinical suspicion of ventilator-associated pneumonia would lead to the administration of empirical antibiotic therapy in the majority of units (77.2%), opinion being almost equally divided on whether this should be mono (49.1%) or combination therapy (50.9%). Although most units received regular microbiology feedback (90.5%), the involvement of a microbiologist in the antibiotic decision-making process was variable. Antibiotics were continued for a median of 7 days (inter-quartile range 5-8.5, range 2-14 days). Compliance with the principal methods of ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention was good.

CONCLUSION

There is widespread variation in the methods used for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia within the UK. The majority of units rely on non-quantitative analysis of tracheal aspirates. This technique has a high percentage of false-positives, and suggests widespread over utilization of antibiotics. However, most agree that antibiotics should be given empirically when there is a clinical suspicion of ventilator-associated pneumonia. The widespread introduction of 'ventilator bundles' appears to have ensured that most units actively take measures to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Diagnosis and treatment of extended-spectrum and AmpC beta-lactamase-producing organisms

OBJECTIVE

To review the laboratory diagnosis of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC beta-lactamase-producing bacteria and evaluate potential treatment options.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search, restricted to English-language articles, was conducted (1966-May 2007) using the search terms ESBL, AmpC, diagnosis, detection, carbapenem, ertapenem, fluoroquinolone, cephalosporin, cefepime, tigecycline, and colistin. Additional references were identified through review of bibliographies of identified articles.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All studies that evaluated laboratory methods for the detection of ESBLs and AmpC beta-lactamases and/or the treatment of these organisms were reviewed. All articles that were deemed to be clinically pertinent were included and critically evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Numerous laboratory techniques are available for the detection of ESBLs. In contrast, laboratory techniques for detection of AmpC beta-lactamases are limited, particularly for plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases. Routine microbiologic testing may not detect ESBLs or AmpC beta-lactamases. Optimal antibiotic treatment options are derived from limited observational studies and case reports. Randomized clinical trials evaluating appropriate antibiotic treatment options are lacking. In vitro susceptibility does not always correlate with clinical outcomes. The use of imipenem was associated with the lowest incidence of mortality in patients with bacteremia due to ESBL-producing organisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory detection of ESBLs for most organisms is possible with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-recommended testing. However, these tests can be associated with both false negative and false positive results, particularly with organisms that harbor both ESBL- and plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases. No established guidelines exist for the detection of AmpC beta-lactamases. Imipenem and meropenem are superior to other antibiotics for the treatment of serious infections due to ESBL and AmpC beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria. While in vitro data demonstrate that tigecycline, ertapenem, and colistin might be potential choices, clinical experience is lacking.

The place of guidelines in hospital-acquired pneumonia

The recent increase in hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) has meant that hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) has come under the spotlight. HAP is the most common HAI contributing to death and affects about 0.5-1% of all patients admitted to hospital. HAP significantly increases health complications and extends the length of time patients stay in hospital by up to 13 days on average, thus impacting significantly on hospital resources. The British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia guidelines were published on the society's website last year and represent one of only two sets of evidence-based HAP guidelines in the world which deal with the trio of prevention, diagnosis and treatment. This paper reviews the evolution and status of HAP guidelines, drawing attention to recent developments, differences in approach and outcomes and further areas of work. There are clear indications that the implementation of evidence-based guidelines will reduce HAP and improve patient outcomes.

Predictive Value of Sputum Gram Stain for the Determination of Appropriate Antibiotic Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is diagnosed in about 30% to 50% of critically ill postsurgical and trauma patients. Early appropriate antibiotic therapy has been associated with improved survival rates. The diagnosis, however, continues to be a challenge. We routinely employ clinical pulmonary infection scores to warrant a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) quantitative culture to subsequently diagnose VAP. Presumptive antibiotic therapy for the first 48 to 72 hours is based on the sputum Gram stain, obtained at the time of BAL. This study was conducted to analyze the predictive value of sputum Gram stain for selecting appropriate early antibiotic therapy for VAP as confirmed by a BAL quantitative culture (>10 CFU/mL considered diagnostic).

METHODS

The retrospective analysis included 124 consecutive intensive care unit patients with 186 identified episodes of presumed VAP from December 2002 to June 2006. VAP episodes were identified by a clinical pulmonary infection score > or =6, availability of a sputum Gram stain, and a corresponding quantitative culture result from a BAL sample.

RESULTS

The overall correlation between Gram stain and subsequent organism identified on the BAL quantitative culture was only fair with a kappa score of 0.314. The best predictive value calculated was for the category of negative Gram stain. However, in 10 of 45 episodes where the sputum Gram stain did not identify a predominant organism, the BAL culture isolated pathogenic strains. Pseudomonas sp. was the most common bacteria isolated from the BAL samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of sputum Gram stain, presumptive triple antibiotic coverage should be instituted to provide dual antibiotic coverage for gram-negative bacilli, and vancomycin for gram-positive cocci. Additionally, identification of no organisms in the sputum Gram stain should still prompt broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage until the final results of the BAL quantitative culture are available.

Diagnostic strategies for nosocomial pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes advances in clinical and microbiological modalities for diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia and the role of biological markers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Serial assessments with the clinical pulmonary infection score identifies nonsurvivors and allows discontinuation of antibiotics when there is low suspicion of pneumonia. Studies evaluating its clinical utility show mixed results. A meta-analysis revealed that an invasive approach does not affect mortality but reduces costs, antibiotic exposure, and multidrug resistance. In contrast to these findings, a recent trial comparing nonquantitative endotracheal aspirate and quantitative bronchoalveolar lavage cultures showed similar clinical outcomes and antibiotic utilization. The role of quantitative endotracheal aspirate for diagnosis of pneumonia not related to mechanical ventilation was recently evaluated. Procalcitonin and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 aid in diagnosis, identify sepsis related to ventilator-associated pneumonia and patients with worst outcomes.

SUMMARY

The diagnostic modality chosen depends on availability, personnel experience, and the patient's clinical status. Recent guidelines support the use of quantitative cultures in an integrated clinical and microbiological algorithm. The decision to adjust antibiotics involves clinical reassessment and interpretation of culture results. Biological markers have a potential role as screening and prognostic tools.

Article Commentary: Strategies in the Prevention and Management of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit. Prevention of VAP is possible through the use of several evidence-based strategies intended to minimize intubation, the duration of mechanical ventilation, and the risk of aspiration of oropharyngeal pathogens. Current data favor the quantitative analysis of lower respiratory tract cultures for the diagnosis of VAP, accompanied by the initiation of broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobial therapy based on patient risk factors for infection with multi-drug-resistant pathogens and data from unit-specific antibiograms. Eventual choice of antibiotic and duration of therapy are selected based on culture results and patient stability, with an emphasis on minimization of unnecessary antibiotic use.

Pneumonia Observational Incidence and Treatment: A Multidisciplinary Process Improvement Study

Background Little information is available on the types, causes, and treatment of pneumonia in intensive care unit patients in usual clinical practice.

Objective To characterize treatment of patients with presumed pneumonia in a tertiary care intensive care unit and to identify potential areas for improvement in care.

Methods In a prospective, cohort study, the sample consisted of all consecutive patients treated in an intensive care unit during a 3-month period. For patients with presumed pneumonia, data were collected on incidence of pneumonia, diagnostic investigations, microbial isolates, and antibiotics prescribed.

Results Of 194 admissions, 73 patients were treated for pneumonia: 47 had community-acquired pneumonia; 12 had hospital-acquired pneumonia; 12 had ventilator-associated pneumonia, both early (7) and late (5); and 2 had intensive care unit–acquired pneumonia. Approximately 71% of patients had microbiological tests performed. Among 54 microbial isolates, 51.9% were gram-positive bacteria, 31.5% were gram-negative bacteria, and 9.3% were Candida species. The most commonly used antimicrobials were quinolones (54 of 192 prescriptions) and cephalosporins (33); each patient received a median of 3 antibiotics.

Conclusions Most cases of pneumonia were community acquired. The most common causative organisms were gram-positive cocci. Four quality improvement strategies were rationalization of antibiotic use during rounds, nurses’ reporting of culture results, review of antibiotic appropriateness by a pharmacist, and redesign of the clinical information system.

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) as an adjunct to antibiotics in the treatment of pneumonia in adults

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a naturally-occurring cytokine that has been shown to increase neutrophil function and number. Exogenous administration of recombinant G-CSF (filgrastim, pegfilgrastim or lenograstim) has found extensive use in the treatment of febrile neutropenia, but its role in the treatment of infection in non-neutropenic hosts is less well defined.

OBJECTIVES

We explored the role of G-CSF as an adjunct to antibiotics in the treatment of pneumonia in non-neutropenic adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For this updated review we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006); MEDLINE (1950 to January 2007); EMBASE (1988 to January 2007); and online databases of clinical trials (www.controlled-trials.com, updated 10 November, 2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which included hospitalized adult patients with either community-acquired pneumonia or hospital-acquired pneumonia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. The primary outcome measure was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures included other markers of mortality as well as markers of adverse events, including organ dysfunction. An assessment of methodological quality was made for each study.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 2018 people were identified. G-CSF use appeared to be safe with no increase in the incidence of total serious adverse events (pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73 to 1.14) or organ dysfunction. However, the use of G-CSF was not associated with improved 28-day mortality (pooled OR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.27).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no current evidence supporting the routine use of G-CSF in the treatment of pneumonia. Studies in which G-CSF is administered prophylactically or earlier in therapy may be of interest.

Inadequate treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: risk factors and impact on outcomes

Initial antibiotic therapy is an important determinant of clinical outcomes in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Several studies have investigated this issue, with conflicting results. This study investigated risk factors of inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy and its impact on outcomes for patients with a clinical diagnosis of VAP. The primary outcome was adequacy of antimicrobial therapy. Secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay, and mortality due to VAP. Mean age was 62.9+/-15.2 years, mean APACHE (Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation) II score was 20.1+/-8.1 and mean MODS (Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score) was 3.7+/-2.5. Sixty-nine (45.7%) of 151 patients with a clinical diagnosis of VAP received inadequate antimicrobial treatment for VAP initially. There were 100 (66.2%) episodes of VAP caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, of which 56% were inadequately treated, whereas the rate of inadequate antimicrobial therapy for VAP caused by susceptible-drug pathogens was 25.5% (P<0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of inadequate antimicrobial treatment was more than twice as great for patients with late-onset VAP [odds ratio (OR), 2.93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.30-6.64; P=0.01], and more than three times for patients with VAP caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.29-7.30; P=0.01) or with polymicrobial VAP (OR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.21-11.12; P=0.02). Inadequate antimicrobial treatment was associated with higher mortality for patients with VAP. Two of three independent risk factors for treatment inadequacy were associated with the isolation and identification of micro-organisms.

Decreases in procalcitonin and C-reactive protein are strong predictors of survival in ventilator-associated pneumonia

Introduction

This study sought to assess the prognostic value of the kinetics of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and clinical scores (clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)) in the outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) at an early time point, when adequacy of antimicrobial treatment is evaluated.

Methods

This prospective observational cohort study was conducted in a teaching hospital. The subjects were 75 patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit from October 2003 to August 2005 who developed VAP. Patients were followed for 28 days after the diagnosis, when they were considered survivors. Patients who died before the 28th day were non-survivors. There were no interventions.

Results

PCT, CRP and SOFA score were determined on day 0 and day 4. Variables included in the univariable logistic regression model for survival were age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, decreasing ΔSOFA, decreasing ΔPCT and decreasing ΔCRP. Survival was directly related to decreasing ΔPCT with odds ratio (OR) = 5.67 (95% confidence interval 1.78 to 18.03), decreasing ΔCRP with OR = 3.78 (1.24 to 11.50), decreasing ΔSOFA with OR = 3.08 (1.02 to 9.26) and APACHE II score with OR = 0.92 (0.86 to 0.99). In a multivariable logistic regression model for survival, only decreasing ΔPCT with OR = 4.43 (1.08 to 18.18) and decreasing ΔCRP with OR = 7.40 (1.58 to 34.73) remained significant. Decreasing ΔCPIS was not related to survival (p = 0.59). There was a trend to correlate adequacy to survival. Fifty percent of the 20 patients treated with inadequate antibiotics and 65.5% of the 55 patients on adequate antibiotics survived (p = 0.29).

Conclusion

Measurement of PCT and CRP at onset and on the fourth day of treatment can predict survival of VAP patients. A decrease in either one of these marker values predicts survival.

A randomized trial of diagnostic techniques for ventilator-associated pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients who require mechanical ventilation are at risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Current data are conflicting as to the optimal diagnostic approach in patients who have suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.

METHODS

In a multicenter trial, we randomly assigned immunocompetent adults who were receiving mechanical ventilation and who had suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia after 4 days in the intensive care unit (ICU) to undergo either bronchoalveolar lavage with quantitative culture of the bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid or endotracheal aspiration with nonquantitative culture of the aspirate. Patients known to be colonized or infected with pseudomonas species or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were excluded. Empirical antibiotic therapy was initiated in all patients until culture results were available, at which point a protocol of targeted therapy was used for discontinuing or reducing the dose or number of antibiotics, or for resuming antibiotic therapy to treat a preenrollment condition if the culture was negative.

RESULTS

We enrolled 740 patients in 28 ICUs in Canada and the United States. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome (28-day mortality rate) between the bronchoalveolar-lavage group and the endotracheal-aspiration group (18.9% and 18.4%, respectively; P=0.94). The bronchoalveolar-lavage group and the endotracheal-aspiration group also had similar rates of targeted therapy (74.2% and 74.6%, respectively; P=0.90), days alive without antibiotics (10.4+/-7.5 and 10.6+/-7.9, P=0.86), and maximum organ-dysfunction scores (mean [+/-SD], 8.3+/-3.6 and 8.6+/-4.0; P=0.26). The two groups did not differ significantly in the length of stay in the ICU or hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Two diagnostic strategies for ventilator-associated pneumonia--bronchoalveolar lavage with quantitative culture of the bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid and endotracheal aspiration with nonquantitative culture of the aspirate--are associated with similar clinical outcomes and similar overall use of antibiotics. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN51767272 [controlled-trials.com].).

Ventilator associated pneumonia

Hospital acquired or nosocomial infections continue to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The critically ill patient is at particular risk of developing intensive care unit acquired infection, with the lungs being especially vulnerable. Nosocomial bacterial pneumonia occurring after two days of mechanical ventilation is referred to as ventilator associated pneumonia, and is the most common nosocomial infection seen in the intensive care unit. Intubation of the trachea and mechanical ventilation is associated with a 7-fold to 21-fold increase in the incidence of pneumonia and up to 28% of patients receiving mechanical ventilation will develop this complication. Its development is associated with an attributable increase in morbidity and mortality. The establishment of an accurate diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia remains problematic and as yet there is still no accepted "gold standard" for diagnosis. The responsible pathogens vary according to case mix, local resistance patterns, and methodology of sampling. However, there is general agreement that rapid initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy improves outcome.

Nosocomial pneumonia

Nosocomial pneumonia remains an important infection that warrants continuing investigation. The past year has seen a number of reports further describing risk factors, controversial issues around diagnosis, and potential preventive strategies. For specific infecting organisms such as Legionnaire's disease and tuberculosis, further reports of issues related to water supply in the former and staff preventive programs in the latter have also been reported. Substantive advances in prevention or management have not, however, been identified.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention

While critically ill patients experience a life-threatening illness, they commonly contract ventilator-associated pneumonia. This nosocomial infection increases morbidity and likely mortality as well as the cost of health care. This article reviews the literature with regard to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. It provides conclusions that can be implemented in practice as well as an algorithm for the bedside clinician and also focuses on the controversies with regard to diagnostic tools and approaches, treatment plans, and prevention strategies.

Use of quantitative cultures and reduced duration of antibiotic regimens for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia to decrease resistance in the intensive care unit

Ventilator-associated pneumonia is responsible for approximately half of the infections acquired in the intensive care unit and represents one of the principal reasons for the prescription of antibiotics in this setting. Invasive diagnostic methods, including bronchoalveolar lavage and/or protected specimen bronchial brushing, could improve the identification of patients with true bacterial pneumonia and facilitate decisions of whether to treat. These techniques also permit rapid optimization of the choice of antibiotics in patients with proven bacterial infection, once the results of respiratory tract cultures become available, based on the identity of the specific pathogens and their susceptibility to specific antibiotics, to avoid prolonged use of a broader spectrum of antibiotic therapy than is justified by the available information. Because unnecessary prolongation of antibiotic therapy for patients with true bacterial infection may lead to the selection of multidrug-resistant microorganisms without improving clinical outcome, efforts to reduce the duration of therapy for nosocomial infections are also warranted. An 8-day regimen can probably be standard for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Possible exceptions to this recommendation include immunosuppressed patients, patients who are bacteremic or whose initial antibiotic therapy was not appropriate for the causative microorganism(s), and patients whose infection is with very difficult-to-treat microorganisms and show no improvement in clinical signs of infection.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common nosocomial infection in the ICU. Patients who acquire VAP have higher mortality rates and longer ICU and hospital stays. Because there are other potential causes of fever, leukocytosis, and pulmonary infiltrates, clinical diagnostic criteria are overly sensitive in the diagnosis of VAP. Employing quantitative cultures of bronchopulmonary secretions in the diagnostic algorithm leads to less antibiotic use and probably to lower mortality. With respect to microbiologic diagnosis, it is not clear that the use of a particular sampling method (bronchoscopic or nonbronchoscopic), when quantitatively cultured, is associated with better outcomes. Delayed administration of adequate antibiotic therapy is linked to an increased mortality rate. Hence, the focus of initial antibiotic therapy should be to rapidly provide antibiotic coverage for all likely pathogens and to then narrow or focus the antibiotic spectrum based on the results of quantitative cultures. Eight days of antibiotic therapy appears equivalent to 15 days of therapy except when treating nonlactose-fermenting Gram-negative organisms. In this latter situation, longer treatment durations appear to reduce the risk of recrudescence after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. A guideline-based approach using the local hospital or ICU antibiogram can increase the likelihood that adequate initial antibiotic therapy is used and reduce the overall use of antibiotics and the associated selection pressure for multidrug-resistant organisms.

Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: focus on nonbronchoscopic techniques (nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, including mini-BAL, blinded protected specimen brush, and blinded bronchial sampling) and endotracheal aspirates

The ideal diagnostic approach for ventilator-associated pneumonia currently is based on invasive procedures to obtain respiratory tract cultures. Given the lack of consensus and relatively poor acceptance of full bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and protected specimen brush (PSB), less invasive procedures have been developed. We review the nonbronchoscopic procedures (nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, including mini-BAL, blinded protected specimen, and blinded bronchial sampling) and endotracheal aspiration. We provide a critique of the methods used, the types of catheters inserted, and the sample collection methods. Most studies were flawed in that antibiotic use before initiation of the procedure was not controlled. The variability of both the methods and the criteria for the gold standard in the numerous investigations show that these procedures are neither standardized nor proven to be accurate and often did not improve management. Pending future studies, use of endotracheal aspirates without the use of quantitation seems to be a reasonable approach for clinicians who are not committed to an invasive procedure.

[Management of ventilator acquired pneumonia]

Ventilator-associated pneumonia occurs in the evolution of 8 to 70% of patients in the Intensive Care Unit. It is the main site of nosocomial infection for mechanically ventilated patients. Nosocomial pneumonia represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality, despite progresses in antibiotic prescription, use of intensive care and prevention. This review is based on the ATS guidelines, and reviews epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-acquired pneumonia, in non-immunocompromised adults.

Ventilator associated pneumonia and infection control

Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care units. The incidence of VAP varies from 7% to 70% in different studies and the mortality rates are 20-75% according to the study population. Aspiration of colonized pathogenic microorganisms on the oropharynx and gastrointestinal tract is the main route for the development of VAP. On the other hand, the major risk factor for VAP is intubation and the duration of mechanical ventilation. Diagnosis remains difficult, and studies showed the importance of early initiation of appropriate antibiotic for prognosis. VAP causes extra length of stay in hospital and intensive care units and increases hospital cost. Consequently, infection control policies are more rational and will save money.