Early detection of pancreatic cancer: why, who, and how to screen

Analysis of tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel invasion of pancreatic carcinoma in the peripheral nerve plexus

Cancer cells can metastasize throughout the body by various mechanisms, including the lymphatic system, resulting in tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis that can profoundly affect patient survival. The aim of the present study was to examine the role of lymphangiogenesis in the metastasis of pancreatic cancer to the peripheral nerve plexus. Immunohistochemistry was performed to analyze specimens obtained from 70 ductal adenocarcinoma patients. The markers used included lymphangiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C, the lymphatic-specific marker D2-40, and cytokeratin 19, an independent prognostic factor for pancreatic tumors. The relationship between survival rate and invasion of both the lymphatic vessels and peripancreatic nerve plexus (PNP) was evaluated, with clearly elevated lymphatic vessel density (LVD) in tissues adjacent to the cancer tissues. In fact, LVD levels were higher in adjacent tissues than in localized cancer tissues, and lymphatic vessel invasion into tissues adjacent to the tumor was significantly correlated with both PNP invasion (P = 0.005) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.010). Correspondingly, LVD in tissues adjacent to the tumor was correlated with both invasion of lymphatic vessels surrounding the tumor (P = 0.024) and VEGF-C expression (P = 0.031); in addition, VEGF-C expression was correlated with invasion of lymphatic vessels around the tumor (P = 0.004). Survival rates were significantly lower in patients in whom there was peritumor lymphatic vessel invasion (P < 0.001), extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion (P = 0.001), and/or lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001). Based on these results, lymphatic invasion associated with adjacent tumor growth likely contributes to the development of metastatic tumors that invade the PNP.

Hereditary pancreatic cancer: molecular bases and their application in diagnosis and clinical management: a guideline of the TTD group

Pancreatic carcinoma (PC) represents the fourth leading cause of cancer death in Spain with a death rate of 2,400 males and 2,000 females per year. Poor outcome related to its silent nature and the lack of reliable secondary prevention measures translate into advanced-stage diagnosis, 75 % of deaths within the first year of diagnosis and 5-year survival rate of <5 %. Family history was first recognized as a risk factor for PC. Further population-based and case-control studies subsequently found that 7.8 % of patients with PC have a family history of the same tumor and individuals with a first-degree relative with PC have a 3.2-fold increased risk of developing PC. Overall, it is estimated that up to 10 % of PC have a familial component. However, known genetic syndromes account for <20 % of the observed familial aggregation of PC. We review the most important aspects in epidemiology, molecular biology and clinical management of familial PC.

Individuals at high-risk for pancreatic cancer development: management options and the role of surgery

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal disease. Despite advances regarding the safety and long-term results of pancreatectomies, early diagnosis remains the only hope for cure. This necessitates the implementation of an intensive screening program (based mainly on modern imaging), which - given the incidence of PC - is not cost effective for the general population. However, this screening program is recommended for individuals at high-risk for PC development. Indications for screening include the following three clinical settings: hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes associated with PC, hereditary pancreatitis and familial pancreatic cancer syndrome. The aim of this strategy is to identify pre-invasive (precursor) lesions, which are curable. Surgery is recommended in the presence of recognizable lesion on imaging lesions. Partial (anatomic) pancreatectomy - depending on the location of the suspicious lesion - is the most widely accepted type of surgical intervention in this setting; occasionally, however, total pancreatectomy may be required, in carefully selected patients. Despite that experience still remains limited, there is evidence that this aggressive strategy allows early detection of neoplastic lesions, thereby improving the effectiveness of surgery and prognosis.

Advances in biomarker research for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a leading cause of cancer related deaths in United States. The lack of early symptoms results in latestage detection and a high mortality rate. Currently, the only potentially curative approach for PC is surgical resection, which is often unsuccessful because the invasive and metastatic nature of the tumor masses makes their complete removal difficult. Consequently, patients suffer relapses from remaining cancer stem cells or drug resistance that eventually lead to death. To improve the survival rate, the early detection of PC is critical. Current biomarker research in PC indicates that a serum carbohydrate antigen, CA 19-9, is the only available biomarker with approximately 90% specificity to PC. However, the efficacy of CA 19-9 for assessing prognosis and monitoring patients with PC remains contentious. Thus, advances in technology and the detection of new biomarkers with high specificity to PC are needed to reduce the mortality rate of pancreatic cancer.

Dual combination therapy targeting DR5 and EMMPRIN in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The goal of the study was to assess the efficacy of combined extracellular matrix metalloprotease inducer (EMMPRIN)- and death receptor 5 (DR5)-targeted therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in orthotopic mouse models with multimodal imaging. Cytotoxicity of anti-EMMPRIN antibody and anti-DR5 antibody (TRA-8) in MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cell lines was measured by ATPlite assay in vitro. The distributions of Cy5.5-labeled TRA-8 and Cy3-labeled anti-EMMPRIN antibody in the 2 cell lines were analyzed by fluorescence imaging in vitro. Groups 1 to 12 of severe combined immunodeficient mice bearing orthotopic MIA PaCa-2 (groups 1-8) or PANC-1 (groups 9-12) tumors were used for in vivo studies. Dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI was applied in group 1 (untreated) or group 2 (anti-EMMPRIN antibody). The tumor uptake of Tc-99m-labeled TRA-8 was measured in group 3 (untreated) and group 4 (anti-EMMPRIN antibody). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging with (18)F-FDG was applied in groups 5 to 12. Groups 5 to 8 (or groups 9 to 12) were untreated or treated with anti-EMMPRIN antibody, TRA-8, and combination, respectively. TRA-8 showed high killing efficacy for both MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells in vitro, but additional anti-EMMPRIN treatment did not improve the cytotoxicity. Cy5.5-TRA-8 formed cellular caps in both the cell lines, whereas the maximum signal intensity was correlated with TRA-8 cytotoxicity. Anti-EMMPRIN therapy significantly enhanced the tumor delivery of the MR contrast agent, but not Tc-99m-TRA-8. Tumor growth was significantly suppressed by the combination therapy, and the additive effect of the combination was shown in both MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 tumor models.

Subject review: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the setting of mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene: case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most commonly inherited lethal autosomal recessive genetic disease amongst Caucasians. CF results from mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Patients with homozygous or compound heterozygous CFTR mutations have a risk of pancreatitis, but typically do not live long enough to develop pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), a disease that has an average age at diagnosis of 65 years. Little is known about the risk of the development of PDA in people who are heterozygous for mutations in the CFTR gene.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report a case of a patient with PDA who underwent resection, who is a carrier for the W1282X nonsense mutation in the CFTR gene. The patient is of Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity and has a family history of CF, but no family history of PDA. We reviewed the English language literature for the prevalence of PDA in CF patients (and CFTR mutations in the setting of PDA) and their significance in terms of screening, and the use of this mutation as a biomarker for an increased risk of the development of PDA.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that patients with CFTR mutations, who also have other risks for the development of PDA such as a family history of the disease, should undergo screening and be educated about their risks.

Anti-tumour activity of afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in human pancreatic tumour cells

BACKGROUND

The combination of the reversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erlotinib with gemcitabine obtained FDA approval for treating patients with pancreatic cancer. However, duration of response is often limited and there is currently no reliable predictive marker.

METHODS

We determined the sensitivity of a panel of human pancreatic tumour cell lines to treatment with afatinib, erlotinib, monoclonal antibody (mAb) ICR62, and gemcitabine, using the Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay. The effect of these agents on cell signalling and cell-cycle distribution was determined by western blot and flow cytometry, respectively.

RESULTS

At 200 nM, ICR62 had no effect on growth of these tumour cells with the exception of BxPC-3 cells. BxPC-3 cells were also sensitive to treatment with afatinib and erlotinib with respective IC(50) values of 11 and 1200 nM. Compared with erlotinib, afatinib was also more effective in inhibiting the growth of the other human pancreatic tumour cell lines and in blocking the EGF-induced phosphorylation of tyrosine, EGFR, MAPK, and AKT. When tested in BxPC-3 xenografts, afatinib induced significant delay in tumour growth.

CONCLUSION

The superiority of afatinib in this study encourages further investigation on the therapeutic potential of afatinib as a single agent or in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer.

Fruit and vegetable consumption is inversely associated with having pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

Studies on fruit, vegetable, fiber, and grain consumption and pancreatic cancer risk are inconclusive. We used a clinic-based case-control study specifically designed to address limitations of both cohort and case-control studies to examine the relationship.

METHODS

Participants were excluded who reported changing their diet within 5 years prior to study entry. And 384 rapidly ascertained cases and 983 controls (frequency matched on age (±5 years), race, sex, and residence) completed epidemiologic surveys and 144-item food frequency questionnaires. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, smoking, body mass index, energy intake, and alcohol consumption.

RESULTS

Comparing highest to lowest quintiles, we observed significant inverse associations (OR < 0.8) with significant trends (p (trend) < 0.05) for citrus, melon, and berries, other fruits, dark green vegetables, deep yellow vegetables, tomato, other vegetables, dry bean and pea, insoluble fiber, soluble fiber, whole grains, and orange/grapefruit juice, and an increased association with non-whole grains. Results were similar after adjusting for diabetes or total sugar intake.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence that lower consumption of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and fiber is associated with having pancreatic cancer. This may have a role in developing prevention strategies.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreas adenocarcinoma: where are we going?

Evaluation of: Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs. gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 304(10), 1073-1081 (2010). Over the last decade, adjuvant therapy in the treatment of resected pancreas adenocarcinoma has had its value established. Such treatment incrementally increases 5-year survivorship and delays time to tumor recurrence. The backbone of adjuvant therapy is the single-agent gemcitabine, based primarily on results from the Charité Onkologie Clinical (CONKO)-001 study. Based on the combined results of the European Study Group for Pancreas Cancer (ESPAC)-1 and ESPAC-3 trials, Neoptolemos and colleagues have established both bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin and gemcitabine as standard options for resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine remains the main standard therapy based on its ease of administration and a more favorable toxicity profile; however, there is now a clearly validated alternate option of 5-fluororuacil and leucovorin based on the results of ESPAC-3. Moving forward, the integration of novel cytotoxic and targeted agents into adjuvant therapy, along with refining the role of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable pancreas cancer, will hopefully accrue a more substantial improvement in outcome for patients with resected pancreas adenocarcinoma.

Is health screening beneficial for early detection and prognostic improvement in pancreatic cancer?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of health screening for early detection and improved prognosis in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2008, 176,361 examinees visited the Health Promotion Center (HPC). Twenty patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer were enrolled. During the same period, 40 patients were randomly selected from 2,202 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer at the Out Patient Clinic (OPC) for comparison.

RESULTS

Within the HPC group, 10 patients were initially suspected of having pancreatic cancer following abnormal ultrasonographic findings, and 9 patients had suspected cases following the detection of elevated serum CA 19-9. The curative resection rate was higher in the HPC group than in the OPC group (p=0.011). The median survival was longer in the HPC group than in the OPC group (p=0.000). However, there was no significant difference in the 3-year survival rate between the two groups. Asymptomatic patients (n=6/20) in the HPC group showed better curative resection and survival rates than symptomatic patients. However, the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Health screening is somewhat helpful for improving the curative resection rate and median survival of patients with pancreatic cancer detected by screening tests. However, the benefit of this method in improving long-term survival is limited by how early the cancer is detected.

Family history of cancer and tobacco exposure in index cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Aim. To examine interaction between history of cancer in first-degree relatives and tobacco smoking in index patients of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods. We carried out a case-control involving 113 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 110 controls over a 12-month period at the Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. They were all administered a detailed tobacco exposure questionnaire and a family history questionnaire. We calculated cumulative tobacco exposure and risk for pancreas cancer. Results. Both smokers (OR 3.01 (95% CI: 1.73 to 5.24)) and those with a family history of malignancy (OR 1.98 (95% CI: 1.15–3.38)) were more likely to develop pancreatic cancer. Having more than one first-degree relative with cancer did not significantly further increase the risk of pancreatic cancer. Amongst pancreatic cancer cases, cumulative tobacco exposure was significantly decreased (P = .032) in the group of smokers (current and ex-smokers) who had a family history of malignancy [mean (SD): 30.00 (24.77) pack-years versus 44.69 (28.47) pack-years with no such history]. Conclusions. Individuals with a family history of malignancy are at an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, individuals with a family history of malignancy and who smoke appear to require a lesser degree of tobacco exposure for the development of pancreatic cancer.

Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for the differentiation between mass forming chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma

PURPOSE

To determine which of the quantitative parameters obtained from intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is the most significant for the differentiation between pancreatic carcinoma and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with pancreatic masses were included, 9 proved to have a mass-forming pancreatitis and 20 had a pancreatic carcinoma. The patients were studied using intravoxel incoherent motion DWI with 11 b-values and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), the true diffusion constant (D) and the perfusion fraction (f) were calculated. The diagnostic strength of the parameters was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The ADC in chronic pancreatitis was higher than in pancreatic carcinoma with significant differences at b = 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300 s/mm (ADC50 = 3.17 ± 0.67 vs. 2.55 ± 1.09, ADC75 = 2.46 ± 0.4 vs. 1.93 ± 0.52, ADC100 = 2.28 ± 0.48 vs. 1.73 ± 0.45, ADC150 = 1.97 ± 0.26 vs. 1.63 ± 0.40, ADC200 = 1.98 ± 0.24 vs. 1.53 ± 0.28, and ADC300 = 1.76 ± 0.19 vs. 1.46 ± 0.31 × 10(-3) mm2/s). No significant differences were found at b = 25, 400, 600, and 800 s/mm (ADC25 = 4.69 ± 0.65 vs. 4.04 ± 1.35, ADC400 = 1.57 ± 0.21 vs. 1.37 ± 0.30, ADC600 = 1.38 ± 0.18 vs. 1.24 ± 0.25, and ADC800 = 1.27 ± 0.10 vs. 1.18 ± 0.19 × 10(-3) mm2/s) nor using ADCtot (1.42 ± 0.23 vs. 1.28 ± 0.12 × 10(-3) mm2/s). The perfusion fraction f was significantly higher in pancreatitis compared with pancreatic carcinoma (16.3% ± 5.30% vs. 8.2% ± 4.00%, P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference between groups for D (1.07 ± 0.224 × 10(-3) mm2/s for chronic pancreatitis and 1.09 ± 0.3 × 10(-3) mm2/s for pancreatic carcinoma, P = 0.66). For f, the highest area under the curve (0.894) and combined sensitivity (80%) and specificity (89.9%) were found.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in ADC50-300 between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Because D is not significantly different between groups, differences in ADC can be attributed mainly to differences in perfusion. The perfusion fraction f proved to be the superior DWI-derived parameter for differentiation of mass-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma.

Advances in early diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer remains a devastating disease with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Recent advances in diagnostic methods and therapeutic approaches have increased the possibility of improving the existing poor prognosis.

DATA SOURCES

English-language articles reporting early diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer were searched from the MEDLINE and PubMed databases, Chinese-language articles were from CHKD (China Hospital Knowledge Database).

RESULT

The current literature about pancreatic cancer was reviewed from three aspects: statistics, screening and early detection, and therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection and screening of pancreatic cancer currently should be limited to high risk patients. Surgical resection is the only curative approach available, with some recent improvement in outcomes. Gemcitabine has been a standard treatment during the last decade. Gemcitabine-based combination treatment, especially combined with newer molecular targeted agents, is promising. The rationale for radiotherapy is controversial, but with the recent development of modern radiation delivery techniques, radiotherapy should be intensified. Patients with borderline pancreatic cancer could benefit from neoadjuvant therapy but more evidence is needed and the best neoadjuvant regimen is still to be determined.

KAI1 inhibits HGF-induced invasion of pancreatic cancer by sphingosine kinase activity

BACKGROUND

KAI1/CD82 has been reported to attenuate the process of metastases in a variety of tumors; however, its mechanism of action in invasion has not been fully elucidated. The present study aimed to investigate the importance of KAI1 in invasion and its correlation with activation of sphingosine kinase (SPK) in human pancreatic cancer PANC1 and Miapaca-2 cell lines.

METHODS

The expression of KAI1 in PANC1 and Miapaca-2 cells, which was mediated by recombinant adenovirus (Ad-KAI1), was assessed by a flow cytometer and Western blotting. After successful infection was established, in vitro growth curve and invasive ability in Boyden Chamber assay were studied. The presence of KAI1 correlating with c-Met and SPK was detected by co-immunoprecipitation and [gamma-32P] ATP incorporation.

RESULTS

KAI1 genes had no significant effects on the curve representing cell growth. After infection with the KAI1 gene, decreased invasive ability in the Boyden Chamber assay was observed in PANC1 and Miapaca-2 cells that were induced by hepatocyte growth factor. Over-expression of KAI1 in the cells led to the deactivation of SPK and a decreased level of intracellular sphingosine-1-phosphate. No correlation was observed between c-Met and KAI1 during co-immunoprecipitation.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study for the first time demonstrated a regulatory role for KAI1 in SPK activation, which leads to decreased invasive ability in disease progression of human pancreatic cancer.

Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate in detail the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreas using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and parameters derived from the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with pancreas carcinoma and 14 volunteers with healthy pancreas were examined at 1.5 Tesla using a single-shot echo-planar imaging DWI pulse sequence. Eleven b-values ranging from 0 to 800 s/mm2 were used. The acquisition was separated into blocks (b0, b25), (b0, b50),...(b0, b800) and each block was acquired in a single expirational breath-hold (TA = 26 seconds) to avoid motion artifacts. The ADC was calculated for all b-values using linear regression yielding ADC(tot). By applying the IVIM model, which allows for the estimation of perfusion effects in DWI, the perfusion fraction f and the perfusion free diffusion parameter D were calculated. The diagnostic performance of ADC, f and D as a measure for the differentiation between healthy pancreas and pancreatic carcinoma was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics analysis.

RESULTS

In the healthy control group, the ADC(tot) ranged from 1.53 to 2.01 microm2/ms with a mean value of 1.71 +/- 0.19 microm2/ms, the perfusion fraction f ranged from 18.5% to 40.4% with a mean value of 25.0 +/- 6.2%, and the diffusion coefficient D from 0.94 to 1.28 microm2/ms with a mean value of 1.13 +/- 0.15 microm2/ms. In patients with pancreas carcinoma, the ADC(tot) ranged from 0.98 to 1.81 microm2/ms with a mean value of 1.31 +/- 0.24 microm2/ms, the perfusion fraction f ranged from 0% to 20.4% with a mean value of 8.59 +/- 4.6% and the diffusion coefficient D from 0.74 to 1.60 microm2/ms with a mean value of 1.15 +/- 0.22 microm2/ms. In comparison to healthy pancreatic tissue, a significant reduction of the perfusion fraction f and of ADC(tot) was found in pancreatic carcinoma (P < 0.00001, 0.0002, respectively). The f value showed more than a 10-fold higher significance level in distinguishing cancerous from normal tissue when compared with the ADC(tot) value. No significant difference in the diffusion coefficient D was observed between the 2 groups (P > 0.5). In the receiver operating characteristic-analyses, the area under curve for f was 0.991 and significantly larger than ADC(tot) (P < 0.05). f had the highest sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value with 95.7%, 100%, 93.3%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the IVIM-approach, the f value proved to be the best parameter for the differentiation between healthy pancreas and pancreatic cancer. The acquisition of several b-values strongly improved the stability of the parameter estimation thus increasing the sensitivity and specificity to 95.7% and 100% respectively. The proposed method may hold great promise for the non invasive, noncontrast-enhanced imaging of pancreas lesions and may eventually become a screening tool for pancreatic cancer.

Therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with the worst mortality rate and an overall 5-year survival rate lower than 5%. In the U.S., this disease is the fourth leading cause of death and represents 6% of all cancer-related deaths. Gemcitabine, the current standard first-line treatment, offers marginal benefits to patients in terms of symptom control and prolongation of life. Since 1996, about 20 randomized phase III trials have been performed to improve the efficacy of gemcitabine, with little success regarding a significant improvement in survival outcomes. The need for novel therapeutic strategies, such as target therapy, is obvious. Monoclonal antibodies have finally come of age as therapeutics and several molecules are now approved for cancer therapies. This review aims to give a general view on the clinical results obtained so far by antibodies for the treatment of pancreatic cancer and describes the most promising avenues toward a significant improvement in the treatment of this frustrating disease.

Identification of pancreatic cancer-specific cell-surface markers for development of targeting ligands

Pancreatic cancer is generally detected at later stages with a poor prognosis and a high-mortality rate. Development of theranostic imaging agents that noninvasively target pancreatic cancer by gene expression and deliver therapies directly to malignant cells could greatly improve therapeutic outcomes. Small-peptide ligands that bind cell-surface proteins and are conjugated to imaging moieties have demonstrated efficacy in cancer imaging. Identification of cancer-specific targets is a major bottleneck in the development of such agents. Herein, a method is presented that uses DNA microarray expression profiling of large sets of normal and cancer tissues to identify targets expressed in cancer but not expressed in relevant normal tissues. Identified targets are subsequently validated for protein expression using tissue microarray. Further validations are performed by quantifying expression in pancreatic cancer cells by quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), by immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry, and by reviewing data and literature in public databases. Validated targets are selected for ligand development based on the existence of a known ligand or by known structure-activity relationships useful for development of novel ligands.

Identification of novel pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell-surface targets by gene expression profiling and tissue microarray

Pancreatic cancer has a high mortality rate, which is generally related to the initial diagnosis coming at late stage disease combined with a lack of effective treatment options. Novel agents that selectively detect pancreatic cancer have potential for use in the molecular imaging of cancer, allowing for non-invasive determination of tumor therapeutic response and molecular characterization of the disease. Such agents may also be used for the targeted delivery of therapy to tumor cells while decreasing systemic effects. Using complementary assays of mRNA expression profiling to determine elevated expression in pancreatic cancer tissues relative to normal pancreas tissues, and validation of protein expression by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray, we have identified cell-surface targets with potential for imaging and therapeutic agent development. Expression profiles of 2177 cell-surface genes for 28 pancreatic tumor specimens and 4 normal pancreas tissue samples were evaluated. Expression in normal tissues was evaluated using array data from 103 samples representing 28 organ sites as well as mining published data. One-hundred seventy unique targets were highly expressed in 2 or more of the pancreatic tumor specimens and were not expressed in the normal pancreas samples. Two targets (TLR2 and ABCC3) were further validated for protein expression by tissue microarray (TMA) based immunohistochemistry. These validated targets have potential for the development of diagnostic imaging and therapeutic agents for pancreatic cancer.

Using genetics and genomics strategies to personalize therapy for cancer: focus on melanoma

Individualizing therapeutic selection for patients is a major goal in cancer treatment today. This goal is best facilitated by understanding both an individual's inherited genetic variation and the somatic genetic changes arising during cancer development. Clinical decision making based on inherited genetic variation is done for those patients with cancer susceptibility syndromes and more generally to personalize drug dosing. Personalized medicine based on genetic and genomic changes within tumors is being applied more widely, with increased use of therapies targeted to somatic mutations and amplifications. Somatic mutations associated with resistance also are being used to select against therapies. Somatic point mutation testing being used clinically includes direct sequencing, short sequencing and single nucleotide interrogation. Single amplifications are commonly assessed using FISH or CISH; high throughput assessment of amplifications and deletions is done mainly on a research basis. Melanomas contain complex mutational profiles that allow them to be sub-grouped by their genetic and genomic profile, each of which then can be evaluated pre-clinically to determine their response to targeted therapies. BRAF V600E mutations are the most common found in melanoma; specific inhibitors of mutant BRAF have been developed and are currently in clinical trials. In addition, other melanoma sub-groups have been identified genetically, which respond to other inhibitors. These studies focus on somatic genetic changes in cancer, which can be targeted directly by therapies. However in the future, personalized medicine will use a combination of inherited and somatic genetics to select the optimal tailored therapy for each patient.

[Risk factors and early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer]

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is usually incurable. Identifying people at risk for developing PC may improve the prognosis of this entity. The main risk factors for PC are Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, hereditary pancreatitis and a history family of PC. Other factors, such as advanced age and smoking, should also be taken into account. PC screening is only useful in very high risk individuals. Tools that allow tumors to be identified in the early stages are required in order to apply appropriate curative treatments. In this scenario, only endoscopic ultrasound with cytological analysis of suspicious pancreatic lesions has proved to be useful.

The membrane-bound mucins: From cell signalling to transcriptional regulation and expression in epithelial cancers

The membrane-bound mucins belong to an ever-increasing family of O-glycoproteins. Based on their structure and localization at the cell surface they are thought to play important biological roles in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, in cell signalling and in modulating biological properties of cancer cells. Among them, MUC1 and MUC4 mucins are best characterized. Their altered expression in cancer (overexpression in the respiratory, gastro-intestinal, urogenital and hepato-biliary tracts) indicates an important role for these membrane-bound mucins in tumour progression, metastasis, cancer cell resistance to chemotherapeutics drugs and as specific markers of epithelial cancer cells. Some mechanisms responsible for MUC1 and MUC4 role in tumour cell properties have been deciphered recently. However, much remains to be done in order to understand the molecular mechanisms and signalling pathways that control the expression of membrane-bound mucins during the different steps of tumour progression toward adenocarcinoma and evaluate their potential as prognostic/diagnostic markers and as therapeutic tools. In this review we focus on the molecular mechanisms and signalling pathways known to control the expression of membrane-bound mucins in cancer. We will discuss the mechanisms of regulation at the promoter level (including genetic and epigenetic modifications) that may be responsible for the mucin altered pattern of expression in epithelial cancers.

Limitations in improving detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To review the current trends in pancreatic cancer research and propose alternatives for an earlier diagnosis.

METHOD

A search was conducted using the PubMed and Scielo electronic databases to find statistics related to the incidence of pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality in the USA; in Colombia the incidence of this neoplasia is 4.5 per 100,000 individuals; and in Peru, amongst digestive diseases, it is the fifth most common cause. In Brazil and Chile this cancer has increased in incidence, while in Mexico, it has decreased in terms of the relative percentage of gastrointestinal cancers from 1976 to 2003. Chronic pancreatitis, cigarette smoking, diabetes, obesity and dietary mutagen exposure are the most consistent risk factors implicated in the development of pancreatic cancer; however, the genetic and molecular changes underlying the epidemiological association between these factors and pancreatic cancer remain largely unknown, and only 5-10% are hereditary in nature.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis for pancreatic cancer has not changed substantially for at least the last 20 years. The most useful tumor marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is still the carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). Currently, a multimodal-screening approach of endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are the most effective methods to detect pancreatic cancer in high-risk patients. Future options for early detection of this malignancy are focused on new molecular markers, telomerase enzyme, receptor-targeted imaging using multifunctional nanoparticles, detection of glycan changes and epigenetics.

Small-molecule inhibitors of proteins involved in base excision repair potentiate the anti-tumorigenic effect of existing chemotherapeutics and irradiation

There has been a recent upsurge in the development of small-molecule inhibitors specific to DNA repair proteins or proteins peripherally involved in base excision repair and the DNA damage response. These specific, nominally toxic inhibitors are able to potentiate the effect of existing cancer cell treatments in a wide array of cancers. One of the largest obstacles to overcome in the treatment of cancer is incomplete killing with initial cancer treatments, leading to resistant cancer. The progression of our understanding of cancer and normal cell responses to DNA damage has allowed us to develop biomarkers that we can use to help us predict responses of cancers, more specifically target cancer cells and overcome resistance. Initial successes using these small-molecule DNA repair inhibitors in target-validation experiments and in the early stages of clinical trials indicate an important role for these inhibitors, and allow for the possibility of a future in which cancers are potentially treated in a highly specific, individual manner.

Dkk-3 expression in the tumor endothelium: a novel prognostic marker of pancreatic adenocarcinomas

Dkk-3 is proposed to be a new specific marker for tumor endothelial cells. Here we analyzed the clinical relevance of Dkk-3 expression in pancreas adenocarcinomas and determined its role on endothelial cell growth in vitro. Microvessel density in tumor samples was immunohistochemically determined using Dkk-3 and CD31 as endothelial cell markers, respectively. Based on the median microvessel density as a cut-off point, patients were categorized into high and low microvessel density groups and a correlation with survival and clinical parameters was assessed. Moreover, the role of Dkk-3 expression on chemosensitivity of endothelial cells was analyzed. In contrast to CD31 staining, Dkk-3-positive vessels were found only in tumor tissue and Dkk-3 microvessel density significantly correlated negative with tumor grading. In survival analysis the median survival time was 7 months for patients with Dkk-3 low, and 15 months for Dkk-3 high microvessel density (P = 0.0013). Subset analysis of patients receiving gemcitabine therapy showed that overall survival was significantly decreased in Dkk-3 low tumors than in high tumors (P = 0.009). In Cox regression Dkk-3 emerged as a significant independent parameter (P = 0.024). Dkk-3 overexpression in endothelial cells resulted in significantly enhanced growth inhibition after 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine treatment compared to control endothelial cells and cancer cell lines. Dkk-3 low microvessel density was associated with tumor progression and worse clinical outcome. Overexpression of Dkk-3 enhanced endothelial cell growth inhibition to chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, we suggest that Dkk-3 high microvessel density may help to select patients who may benefit from chemotherapy.

Pancreatic cancer surveillance among high-risk populations: knowledge and intent

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cancer in both men and women in the United States. It has the lowest survival rate of all cancers, largely due to the presence of non-specific symptoms, leading to diagnosis at advanced stages. While the majority of cases of pancreatic cancer are sporadic, up to 10% may be associated with an inherited predisposition. Currently, there is no standard screening protocol for pancreatic cancer, although this will change in the future as technology improves. Additionally, there is little information regarding the perceptions and intent to screen for pancreatic cancer among those with an increased risk due to a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome, which was the objective of this study. Focus groups and individual telephone interviews were conducted, with questions focused on knowledge about pancreatic cancer and screening, perceived motivators, and perceived barriers related to each of the screening techniques currently available. Participants were recruited from the High Risk Breast Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer Registries at Huntsman Cancer Institute. The findings of this study indicated that individuals from these high-risk groups have low knowledge levels of pancreatic cancer screening, despite their desire for this information. Motivation to undergo a particular screening technique is related to whether the test is recommended by a physician, cost, degree of invasiveness, and comfort level. This information is useful to genetics professionals who counsel at-risk individuals, physicians who formulate patient care plans, and translational researchers who are developing pancreatic screening methods.