Health care costs and resource utilization, including patient burden, associated with novel-agent-based treatment versus other therapies for multiple myeloma: findings using real-world claims data

Increasing economic burden of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment failure by line of therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the economic burden of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment failure in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), by assessing all-cause health care resource use (HCRU) and costs in the year after treatment failure by line of therapy (LOT; 1L/2L/3L) using real-world data.

METHODS

Treatment episodes initiating a TKI of interest (index TKI) during June 2008-December 2011 were identified from the IMS PharMetrics Plus Health Plan Claims Database for adult patients with CML diagnosis (ICD-9-CM 205.1x), 120 days pre-index continuous enrollment (CE) and no clinical trial participation. Episodes experiencing treatment failure, defined as switch to a non-index TKI or discontinuation of index TKI (gap of ≥ 60 days), and with 1 year CE post-failure, were analyzed. LOT was determined by number of unique TKIs used in the pre-index. All-cause HCRU and costs (2012 USD) in the 1 year post-failure were assessed by LOT, and the comparisons between 1L and 2L failures were also adjusted using multivariate generalized linear models (GLMs) to control for underlying differences.

RESULTS

A total of 706 episodes were identified (518 1L; 180 2L; 8 3L). Unadjusted HCRU over 1 year post-failure increased significantly. This was accompanied by a significant increase in unadjusted mean costs for 2L failures vs. 1L failures ($99,624 vs. $78,667, p = 0.021, Δ$20,957). Following the adjustment using GLMs, adjusted mean costs were 38% higher (95% CI 1.14-1.68), driven primarily by use of medical services. In adjusted analyses, compared to 1L, 2L failures had: 45% more ambulatory visits (mean 31 vs. 21, 95% CI 1.26-1.66), 75% higher risk of hospitalization (33% vs. 23% hospitalized, 95% CI 1.16-2.64), and 73% higher medical costs (95% CI 1.31-2.29). Medical costs comprised a greater proportion of total costs in 2L vs. 1L (55% vs. 44%); pharmacy costs did not increase significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The economic burden over 1 year post TKI failure increased with each sequential line of TKI treatment failure.

New Approaches to Molecular Imaging of Multiple Myeloma

Molecular imaging plays an important role in detection and staging of hematologic malignancies. Multiple myeloma (MM) is an age-related hematologic malignancy of clonal bone marrow plasma cells characterized by destructive bone lesions and is fatal in most patients. Traditional skeletal survey and bone scans have sensitivity limitations for osteolytic lesions manifested in MM. Progressive biomedical imaging technologies such as low-dose CT, molecularly targeted PET, MRI, and the functional-anatomic hybrid versions (PET/CT and PET/MRI) provide incremental advancements in imaging MM. Imaging with PET and MRI using molecularly targeted probes is a promising precision medicine platform that might successfully address the clinical ambiguities of myeloma spectrum diseases. The intent of this focus article is to provide a concise review of the present status and promising developments on the horizon, such as the new molecular imaging biomarkers under investigation that can either complement or potentially supersede existing standards.

Cost-Effectiveness of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Database

In the past decade, the number of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplants (Auto HSCT) for older patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has increased dramatically, as has the cost of transplantation. The cost-effectiveness of this modality in patients over age 65 is unclear. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database to create a propensity-score matched sample of patients over age 65 between 2000 and 2007, we compared the survival and cost for those who received Auto HSCT to those who did not undergo transplantation but survived at least 6 months after diagnosis, and we calculated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Two hundred seventy patients underwent transplantation. Median overall survival from diagnosis in those who underwent transplantation was significantly longer than in patients who did not (58 months versus 37 months, P < .001). For patients living longer than 2 years, the median monthly cost during the first year was significantly different, but the middle and last year of life costs were similar. The median cost of the first 100 days after transplantation was $60,000 (range, $37,000 to $85,000). The resultant ICER was $72,852 per life-year gained. Survival after transplantation was comparable to that in those who underwent transplantation patients under 65 years and significantly longer than older patients who did not undergo transplantation. With an ICER less than $100,000/life-year gained, Auto HSCT is cost-effective when compared with nontransplantation care in the era of novel agents and should be considered, where clinically indicated, for patients over the age of 65.

Financial toxicity in insured patients with multiple myeloma: a cross-sectional pilot study

BACKGROUND

Financial toxicity is increasingly recognised as adversely affecting the quality of life and medication adherence in patients with cancer in the USA. Patients with multiple myeloma might be particularly vulnerable because of high use of novel treatments and extended treatment duration.

METHODS

Between Aug 18, 2014, and Jan 7, 2015, we did a cross-sectional survey of individuals receiving at least 3 months of ongoing treatment for multiple myeloma at a tertiary academic medical centre in the USA. The survey was derived from previous reported studies and included the 11-item COST measure (financial toxicity score range 0-44). A paper survey was offered to eligible patients on arrival for routine follow-up visits, and participants were asked to complete the survey before or after their visit to the clinic. Insurance and treatment data were obtained from patients' electronic health records.

FINDINGS

Of 111 patients approached for the study, 100 individuals completed the survey. 59 (59%) of 100 patients reported that treatment costs were higher than expected, 70 (71%) of 99 had at least minor financial burden, and 36 (36%) of 100 reported applying for financial assistance. Use of savings to pay for myeloma treatment was common (43 [46%] of 94 patients) and 21 (21%) of 98 individuals borrowed money to pay for medications. COST scores were highly correlated with patient-reported use of strategies to cope with myeloma treatment expenses. On multivariable analysis, younger age (correlation coefficient β 0·36, 95% CI 0·15 to 0·56, p=0·00092), non-married status (5·6, 1·5 to 9·6, p=0·0074), longer duration since diagnosis (-4·8, -9·3 to -0·2, p=0·042), and lower household income (US$40 000-79 999: 7·8, 2·7 to 12·9, p=0·0031; ≥$80 000: 11·8, 7·1 to 16·4, p<0·0001) were associated with higher financial burden as measured with the COST score.

INTERPRETATION

Patient-reported financial toxicity and use of coping mechanisms were common in our insured population with multiple myeloma. Additional attention to rising treatment costs and cost sharing is needed to address the increasing evidence of financial toxicity affecting patients with cancer.

FUNDING

University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.

Double Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Outcomes and Real World Healthcare Costs

Double relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (DRMM), MM that is relapsed and/or refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide, carries a poor prognosis. The healthcare costs of DRMM have not previously been reported. We analyzed detailed medical resource utilization (MRU) costs, drug costs and outcomes for 39 UK patients receiving standard DRMM therapy. Median OS in this cohort was 5.6 months. The mean cost of DRMM treatment plus MRU until death was £23,472 [range: £1,411-£90,262], split between drug costs £11,191 and other resource use costs £12,281. The cost per assumed quality-adjusted life year (QALY) during DRMM was £66,983. These data provide a standard of care comparison when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of new drugs in DRMM.

Patterns of total cost and economic consequences of progression for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Few studies have addressed the cost patterns of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) before and after first relapse. This US claims analysis evaluated, from a US health plan perspective, patterns of total direct costs of care from treatment initiation to progression for patients with MM treated with novel agents, using time to next therapy (TTNT) as a proxy measure for progression.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using a large US claims database, evaluating patients with claims for MM between 2006 and 2013. Patients with claims for stem cell transplant (SCT) were excluded. The analysis focused on patients receiving lenalidomide (LEN) or bortezomib (BORT) based treatment, for whom complete claim history was available through initiation of subsequent treatment. Average patient monthly direct costs were determined, including medical and pharmacy costs, and total cost patterns over quarterly time periods were calculated.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 2843 patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and 1361 with relapsed MM. Total monthly cost for patients with NDMM declined steadily, from $15,734 initially to $5082 at 18+ months after therapy. Upon initiation of second-line therapy, total monthly costs rose to $13,876 and declined to $6446 18 months later. Although NDMM cost levels for individual ordinal months were similar between the LEN and BORT groups, TTNT was longer for LEN-based treatments (37 months). The BORT-treated cohort had higher average monthly total costs for NDMM and for the common time period through 37 months after initiation of therapy ($7534 vs $10,763 for LEN and BORT, respectively). Key limitations of this study, in addition to the lack of mortality and staging information available from claims data, include the definition of TTNT based on change in treatment or a defined gap in therapy prior to retreatment, which may differ from actual time of progression in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with NDMM receiving either LEN- or BORT-based treatment without SCT, followed until TTNT, total direct monthly costs (drug + medical) declined steadily over time. Monthly costs returned to near initial levels when patients began second-line therapy and then followed a similar pattern of decline. Due to the longer TTNT for patients initiated on LEN and the associated longer period of below-average costs, patients initiated with LEN-based treatments had mean monthly total costs >$3200 lower than total costs for patients initiated on BORT during the first 3 years after starting treatment, cumulating to nearly $120,000 in lower costs for patients initiated on LEN.

Estimating the Costs of Therapy in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Model Framework

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma is a progressive cancer for which there is no cure. Despite treatment, almost all patients eventually experience periods of disease relapse and remission. With the increasing use of novel therapies, including bortezomib, lenalidomide, carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and panobinostat, benchmarks for assessing the value of these therapies in treating patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are needed for physicians and payers alike.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a model framework and to calculate an annual estimate of the total costs per patient for the treatment of patients with RRMM using 7 common treatment regimens, including bortezomib plus dexamethasone; panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; lenalidomide plus dexamethasone; lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; carfilzomib; carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone; and pomalidomide plus dexamethasone.

METHODS

The expenditures for drugs and their administration, for prophylaxis and adverse event monitoring, and for the treatment of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were included in the calculations of the total pharmacy and medical costs. The drug costs were based on published pricing and labeled dosing schedules; the adverse event prophylaxis and monitoring costs were obtained from peer-reviewed publications; and the adverse event incidence rates were obtained from each regimen's prescribing information and from clinical trials. All the costs were summed over the duration of therapy for which the drugs were administered and were calculated separately for commercial and Medicare plans. The duration of therapy for each regimen was the time for which a patient had to be receiving the regimen to obtain 12 months of progression-free survival based on the duration-of-therapy to progression-free survival ratio observed from published clinical trials and/or the drug's labeling.

RESULTS

The pharmacy costs were highest for pomalidomide plus dexamethasone, whereas the medical costs were highest for the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. The total cost associated with available treatments for RRMM was highest for regimens that included lenalidomide (approximate range, $126,000-$256,000). Only bortezomib plus dexamethasone and the combination of panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone had total costs that were lower than $125,000 per patient.

CONCLUSION

This study represents the first model developed to comprehensively estimate the costs of managing RRMM with all currently approved and guideline-recommended regimens in the United States. As such, it provides the framework and basis for further budget impact analyses and for cost-effectiveness comparisons with these regimens.