Significance of hepatic pedicle lymph node involvement in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a prospective study

A two-stage hepatectomy procedure combined with portal vein embolization to achieve curative resection for initially unresectable multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcome after a 2-stage hepatectomy procedure (TSHP) combined with portal vein embolization (PVE) in the treatment of patients with unresectable multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases (MBCLM).

BACKGROUND

Patients with MBCLM are often considered for palliative chemotherapy only, due to too small future remnant liver (FRL). Recently, right hepatectomy with simultaneous left liver wedge resections after previous right PVE has been reported in a curative intent. However, the growth of metastatic nodules in FRL after PVE can be more rapid than that of the nontumoral remnant hepatic parenchyma. Therefore, metastases located in the FRL should be ideally resected before PVE. Then, a right (or extended right) hepatectomy can be safely performed during a second-stage hepatectomy. Therefore, we analyzed our experience with the use of TSHP combined with PVE in treatment of MBCLM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 1996 and April 2003, 33 patients with unresectable MBCLM were selected for a TSHP. A right or an extended right hepatectomy was planned after treatment of left FRL metastases to achieve a curative resection. The first-stage hepatectomy consisted in a clearance of the left hemiliver by resection or radiofrequency destruction of metastases of the left FRL. Subsequently, a right PVE was performed to induce atrophy of the right hemiliver and hypertrophy of the left hemiliver. Finally, a second-stage hepatectomy was planned to resect the right liver metastases.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality. Post-PVE morbidity was 18.1%; postoperative morbidity was 15.1% and 56.0% after first- and second-stage hepatectomy, respectively. TSHP could be achieved in 25 of 33 patients (75.7%). The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 70.0% and 54.4%, respectively, in the 25 patients in whom the TSHP was completed.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with initially unresectable MBCLM, a TSHP combined with PVE can be achieved safely with long-term survival similar to that observed in patients with initially resectable liver metastases.

First and repeat resection of colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcome after first and repeat resection in patients older than 70 years.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Liver resection is the best treatment for colorectal liver metastases and is currently increasingly performed in elderly patients. The benefit of resection for these patients needs to be evaluated.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2000, 56 first and 16 repeat liver resections were performed in 61 patients older than 70 years. Patients were identified from a prospective database and records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

First and repeat liver resection resulted, respectively, in a 0% and 7% postoperative mortality rate and a 41% and 38% complication rate, respectively. Median survival after first resection of 53 patients with R0 resection was 33 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 22%. Factors associated with poor long-term survival in multivariate analysis were extrahepatic disease, high carcinoembryonic antigen level over 200 ng/mL, and the presence of 3 or more liver metastases. Patients without these risk factors showed a median survival of 42 months and a 5-year survival rate of 36%. Repeat liver resection resulted in a median survival of 17 months and in a 3-year survival rate of 25%.

CONCLUSION

First and repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases can be performed safely in patients older than 70 years. A 5-year survival rate similar to those of younger patients can be expected after first liver resection for patients without the presence of risk factors.

Impact of microscopic hepatic lymph node involvement on survival after resection of colorectal liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

Macroscopic hepatic lymph node involvement is usually a contraindication to hepatic resection. Only a few studies have investigated the impact of hepatic lymph node involvement on survival. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess microscopic hepatic lymph node involvement in resectable colorectal liver metastasis and outcomes in patients with such involvement.

STUDY DESIGN

From January 1985 to December 2000, 156 patients underwent curative liver resection in association with systematic hepatic lymph node dissection for colorectal liver metastasis. A first analysis was performed to assess the association between hepatic lymph node metastasis and patients' characteristics. A second analysis assessed survival after resection of liver colorectal metastasis by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of the 156 patients (15%) had microscopically involved hepatic lymph nodes. No predictive factor of lymph node metastasis was identified. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, number of metastases, and morbidity were factors influencing survival. The 3- and 5-year survival rates of patients with lymph node metastasis were 27% and 5%, respectively, compared with 56% and 43% without lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

During resection of liver colorectal metastasis, microscopic lymph node involvement occurred in 15% of the patients and was associated with a poor 5-year survival. Hepatic lymph node dissection should be performed systematically to select high-risk patients.

The significance of hepatic pedicle lymph nodes metastases in surgical management of colorectal liver metastases and of other liver malignancies

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is the only hope for cure, with a 5-year survival rate ranging from 20% to 54%. However, the resectability rate of CLM is reported to be <20%. This limitation is mainly due to insufficient remnant liver and to extrahepatic disease. Among extrahepatic locations, lymph node metastases are often considered indications of a very poor prognosis and a contra-indication to resection.

METHODS

and

RESULTS

Our studies showed that the prevalence of hepatic pedicle lymph node metastases ranges from 10% to 20%. When located near the hilum and along the hepatic pedicle (area 1) they should not be considered an absolute contra-indication to resection of CLM, and an extended lymphadenectomy should be performed. However, when they reach the celiac trunk (area 2), there is no survival benefit after resection of CLM. For other cases of liver malignancies, lymph node dissection seems justified only in cases of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma and in case of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, few data are available, and they are controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for more evaluation of lymph node involvement, at least in patients with high risk of such an extension, i.e., patients with more than three metastases, located in segment 4 or 5. There is also a need for prospective trials in order to evaluate the survival benefit of liver resection in such circumstances and the impact of extensive lymphadenectomy.

Locoregional strategies for colorectal hepatic metastases

Hepatic colorectal metastases present a challenging problem in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Twenty percent of patients with recurrence will have liver metastases as a component of their disease, and only 10% of these patients will have isolated liver metastases that are resectable. Although systemic chemotherapy alone has not proven efficacious in the treatment of liver metastases, a number of options exist in managing these lesions. For those that are resectable, surgery remains the optimal treatment, with an expected 5-year survival rate of 33%-39% based on several large series. Hepatic artery chemotherapy is another adjunct treatment in patients undergoing resection and may further improve survival. This benefit may be even more pronounced when combined with systemic chemotherapy. Newer-generation agents are likely to further improve results. More recently, new therapeutic modalities have been used to treat unresectable lesions. These include hepatic artery chemotherapy and ablative techniques such as radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. This article will highlight the data regarding hepatic resection for colorectal metastases, describe the rationale for and efficacy of hepatic arterial chemotherapy in the postoperative adjuvant setting and in unresectable liver disease, and review the current literature describing ablative techniques in the treatment of liver metastases.