Significant small-bowel lesions detected by alternative diagnostic modalities after negative capsule endoscopy

Assessment of appropriateness of indications for CT enterography in younger patients

BACKGROUND

The small potential risk of radiation-induced cancer is increased in younger patients undergoing serial imaging with computed tomography enterography (CTE). We sought to determine the appropriateness of CTEs based on clinical indication in patients < or =35 years old, and the potential impact of evolution of practice to alternative magnetic resonance enterography (MRE).

METHODS

Over a 7-year period, the medical records of all patients < or =35 years old undergoing CTE were reviewed to determine the clinical indications for each CTE exam. An interdisciplinary consensus panel evaluated the appropriateness of all CTE exams based on American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria and peer-reviewed literature, classifying indications into "appropriate" or "inappropriate." For repeat CTEs, an "alternative MRE suggested" pathway was created. Criteria for evolution of practice to "alternative MRE" were suspicion of obstruction and evaluation of disease activity/therapeutic response in the absence of new symptoms.

RESULTS

In all, 2022 patients < or =35 years old underwent 2295 CTEs. Ninety-nine percent (2008/2022) of first-time CTE exams were "appropriate" by the defined criteria. A total of 197 patients (9.7%) underwent multiple exams, with 73% of these patients having Crohn's disease. Repeat exams occurred in 9% (18/197) with obstructive symptoms and evaluation of disease activity/therapeutic response in the absence of new symptoms in 41% (80/197).

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary expert panel concluded that the vast majority of young patients underwent clinically appropriate first-time CTE exams. However, a shift in clinical practice to MRE appears warranted for approximately half of young patients undergoing repeat CTE examinations.

Outcomes associated with deep enteroscopy

The purpose of this article is to describe the available data regarding the short- and long-term outcomes associated with deep enteroscopy. Deep enteroscopy can be defined as the use of an enteroscope to examine small bowel distal to the ligament of Treitz or proximal to the distal ileum. The term deep enteroscopy includes double-balloon, single-balloon, and spiral enteroscopy. Comparisons are made with push enteroscopy and intraoperative enteroscopy, the major therapeutic endoscopic options available to the gastroenterologist before the introduction of deep enteroscopy. The article concludes with a discussion regarding complications associated with deep enteroscopy and cost-effectiveness of management strategies for obscure bleeding. Proposed changes to the current algorithm for management of obscure bleeding are suggested.

Enteroscopy in the diagnosis and management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy, have revolutionized our approach to the diagnosis and management of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, largely replacing intraoperative enteroscopy and conventional barium studies. Despite its limitations, capsule endoscopy may well be the most reasonable initial diagnostic strategy to evaluate most patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, leaving balloon-assisted enteroscopy in reserve as a complementary tool. This article reviews the data on enteroscopy, with particular emphasis on the use of capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy for the diagnosis and management of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Enteroscopy: an overview

Although the small intestine has long been considered the final frontier of endoscopy, a vast amount of progress has led to increased diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities. With the increasing prevalence of capsule endoscopy, the need for enteroscopy also continues to increase. The endoscopic options currently available include double and single balloon-assisted enteroscopy, spiral enteroscopy, and lastly, intraoperative enteroscopy. The majority of published literature has focused on double balloon enteroscopy, but further studies have to provide information on the safety and yield of the newer techniques. Although intraoperative enteroscopy may be practiced less frequently, it has a role in the management of lesions that may not be approachable by other endoscopic means and a role in the guidance of surgical management.

Small bowel enteroscopy: territory conquered, future horizons

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent advances in small bowel enteroscopy, focusing on indications, modifications to improve imaging and techniques, pitfalls, and clinical applications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The need for endoscopic access to improve diagnosis and treatment of small bowel disease has led to the development of novel technologies, video capsule, and double balloon endoscopy. Newer devices, single balloon and spiral endoscopy, are just entering clinical use. With new technologies come the trials and tribulations of learning new endoscopic skills and determining their role in the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel disease. Identification of small bowel lesions has dramatically improved. However, small bowel angulations, peristalsis, and bilious fluid in the lumen can result in false readings or missed lesions. Studies are underway to determine the best strategy to apply new enteroscopy technologies for the diagnosis and management of small bowel disease, particularly bleeding.

SUMMARY

Complete enteroscopy of the small bowel is now possible. However, because of the length of the small bowel, endoscopic examination and therapeutic maneuvers require patience and significant skill. Prospective randomized studies are needed to guide diagnostic testing and therapy with these new endoscopic techniques.