Prevalence of anaphylactic reactions to aprotinin: analysis of two hundred forty-eight reexposures to aprotinin in heart operations

Tranexamic acid and aprotinin reduce postoperative bleeding and transfusions during primary coronary revascularization

We evaluated the blood conservation effects of tranexamic acid (TA) or aprotinin administered before and during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of 150 adult patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Patients received either TA (2 g) or large-dose aprotinin (7 million KIU). Thirty additional untreated patients otherwise managed in a similar fashion were included from a recently completed study for comparison of outcomes. Demographic, medical, surgical, laboratory, mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTD), transfusion, and outcome data were collected. Allogeneic blood product administration was tightly controlled. The demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics did not significantly differ between the two therapy groups. The median postoperative MCTD loss in the TA group did not significantly differ from that in the aprotinin-treated group (708 vs 600 mL). The percentage of patients that received no allogeneic blood products was 25% for the TA group and 27% for the aprotinin group (P = not significant). The median number of allogeneic blood products administered to the TA group (0 U) did not significantly differ from that administered to the aprotinin group (0 U). The percentage of patients with excessive MCTD (>1000 mL/24 h) did not significantly differ between groups (19% and 17%, respectively). In comparison, the control group had a significantly greater (P < 0.05) median MCTD (1020 mL), median allogeneic blood product exposure (4.5 U), and incidence of excessive MCTD (66%) and transfusion therapy (66%). These data help to support the use of pharmacologic methods to improve clinically relevant indicators of blood conservation for primary CPB procedures. Furthermore, the data show that TA is equivalent to aprotinin for blood conservation in patients at risk of excessive post-CPB bleeding and transfusion therapy.

IMPLICATIONS

In a randomized, blind trial, we evaluated the effects of tranexamic acid or aprotinin on blood conservation after primary cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Both drugs were equally effective in reducing blood loss, the incidence of transfusion, and the amount of blood products transfused compared with placebon.

Incidence of hypersensitivity reactions

BACKGROUND

Aprotinin is a naturally occurring serine protease inhibitor derived from bovine lung. In common with all foreign proteins, it possesses antigenic properties and has the possibility of allergic reactions on reexposure.

METHODS

Data are presented on the incidence of adverse reactions to aprotinin and the time course of antibody development after initial exposure. Recommendations for reducing the risk and sequelae of these adverse reactions are emphasized and case reports are reviewed.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of aprotinin-related reactions to date (May 1997) at the German Heart Center are 2.7% in the adult population in reexposures (5/183) and 1.2% in the pediatric population (3/254), with an overall incidence of 1.8% (8/437).

CONCLUSIONS

With the recommended precautions, reexposure to aprotinin in patients with a high risk of bleeding is justified, and the benefits of aprotinin treatment outweigh the relative risk of a serious allergic reaction.

Fibrin sealant, aprotinin, and immune response in children undergoing operations for congenital heart disease

OBJECTIVE

Most commercially available fibrin sealants contain aprotinin in doses of 1500 kallikrein inactivator units per milliliter. They are used in many operative disciplines. An elevated risk of hypersensitivity reactions exists at reexposure to aprotinin. Our aim was to examine the immunogenic potency of aprotinin as a fibrin sealant content.

METHODS

We investigated 49 children with operatively treated congenital heart disease. All patients received aprotinin only topically as contained in fibrin sealant. Serum samples were drawn preoperatively, 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and approximately 1 year after operation. They were analyzed for aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies with a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay for aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin E antibodies.

RESULTS

At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 1 year, we found prevalences of 8% (2 of 26), 8% (2 of 24), 6% (3 of 49), and 0% for aprotinin-specific Immunoglobulin E, and for aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin G 8% (2 of 26), 17% (4 of 24), 39% (19 of 49), and 12% (5 of 41). The doses of aprotinin given did not differ significantly in antibody-negative and antibody-positive patients; no significant factors could predict the immune response.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show the existence of a subgroup of patients who had aprotinin-specific antibodies develop after topical aprotinin application. Any use of aprotinin must be carefully documented. If aprotinin use is planned in patients who previously underwent a surgical procedure, preexposure to aprotinin in any form must be sought to avoid unexpected anaphylactic reactions. The necessity itself and alternatives for aprotinin as a stabilizing agent in fibrin sealants merit consideration.

Blood transfusion: influence of transfusion therapy on outcome

Few studies have addressed the influence of different transfusion therapies on outcome in a convincing way. Proven adverse impact of allogeneic blood on outcome is minimal. Acute mortality has declined to about 1 : 500,000 and the rate of transfusion-transmitted infections is decreasing, too. Data on postoperative infections and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma as possible adverse effects are controversial. Evidence for an increased risk of tumour recurrences is lacking. Alternatives to allogeneic blood may have appreciable risks: perioperative blood recovery had a fatality rate of more than 1 : 40,000. Reduction of allogeneic blood exposure may not be equated with improved outcome.

Aprotinin versus lysine analogues: the debate continues

The decision to use any pharmacologic intervention inevitably rests on balancing the efficacy and safety of the intervention. The advent of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome epidemic greatly increased awareness of transfusion-related illnesses and focused attention on methods to prevent the need for blood and blood products. This has led, especially in the last decade, to increased use of drugs to help reduce perioperative bleeding. This chapter focuses on the lysine analogues and aprotinin as the serine protease inhibitor currently available in clinical practice. Both groups of compounds have recently shown promise in reducing surgical bleeding. However, the reader will notice that none of these agents are new; they have all been available for more than 30 years. What is new is their use in preventing bleeding. We therefore have considerable knowledge regarding the safety of these compounds. The first part of this review will compare the actions of these two types of agents on the processes related to thrombosis, hemostasis, and fibrinolysis. This is followed by a comparison of the efficacy of each intervention and any dose-response relationship. This section highlights the reported reduction in postoperative bleeding with both classes of agent. There is, however, no obvious or consistent reduction in the transfusion of blood and blood products in patients given lysine analogues. In contrast, there is a consistent reduction in the need for blood transfusions in patients given aprotinin therapy. The next major section will discuss the evidence to suggest that these drugs may, because of their known effects on the processes related to inflammation, hemostasis, and cellular repair, contribute to an improvement or worsening of outcome after cardiac operations. In particular, this section focuses on the antiinflammatory actions and modifications in vascular tone associated with aprotinin therapy. These effects may be related to improved outcome in patients by reducing the incidence of permanent neurologic deficit or stroke after heart operations, as well as inhibiting pulmonary vascular hyperreactivity and hypertension in susceptible individuals. Finally, this brief review discusses the safety issues that have been raised in regard to each of these classes of agents, specifically problems associated with abnormal renal function, hypersensitivity reactions, and thrombotic complications.

Influence of high- and low-dose aprotinin on activation of hemostasis in open heart operations

BACKGROUND

The protease inhibitor aprotinin reduces hemostatic activation and blood loss after cardiac operations. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of two different aprotinin doses on hemostatic activation and to identify the most effective dose to reduce the postoperative bleeding tendency.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 230 patients scheduled for routine open heart operations received either high-dose (group H) or low-dose (group L) aprotinin. Primary outcome measures were the level of F(1+2) prothrombin fragments as a marker of thrombin generation, the level of D-dimers as an indicator of fibrinolysis, and the amount of postoperative blood loss. Allogeneic blood transfusion was recorded as a secondary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Aprotinin plasma concentrations 5 minutes after the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass were 166 +/- 45 kallikrein inactivator units per milliliter in group H and 118 +/- 30 kallikrein inactivator units per milliliter in group L (p < 0.05). Fibrinolytic activation was reduced significantly in group H compared with group L: the level of D-dimers at the end of CPB was 1,027 +/- 781 ng/mL and 1,977 +/- 1,001 ng/mL, respectively, in the two groups (p < 0.05). However, thrombin generation (F(1+2) fragments) did not differ between the two groups (7.4 +/- 3.5 nmol/L in group H and 8.6 +/- 4.3 nmol/L in group L). Twenty-four-hour postoperative blood loss was 663 +/- 461 mL in group H compared with 877 +/- 513 mL in group L (p < 0.05), and the corresponding allogeneic blood requirement was 1.3 +/- 1.9 U in group H and 1.9 +/- 2.3 U in group L (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A high-dose aprotinin regimen was significantly more effective than a low-dose regimen in attenuating fibrinolysis and reducing the bleeding tendency and allogeneic blood requirements, but not in reducing F(1+2) prothrombin fragments. High-dose aprotinin therapy appears to be superior to low-dose therapy.

Antifibrinolytic drugs and perioperative hemostasis

Although excessive bleeding is widely recognized as a common complication of cardiac surgery, the recent success of antifibrinolytic drugs as prophylactic hemostatic agents has received little attention outside the surgical literature. The etiology of the coagulopathy following cardiac surgery is clearly multifactorial; however, the success of antifibrinolytic drugs as hemostatic agents suggests that fibrinolysis contributes to bleeding in this setting. Increasingly widespread administration of these drugs necessitates increased awareness of the risks and benefits posed by perioperative antifibrinolytic therapy. The objectives of this review are to understand the mechanisms of action of antifibrinolytic drugs in the context of the normal hemostatic response and to review evidence pertaining to the efficacy and safety of antifibrinolytic drugs as hemostatic agents during cardiac surgery.