Catalytic and framework mutations in the neuraminidase active site of influenza viruses that are resistant to 4-guanidino-Neu5Ac2en

Characterization of recombinant influenza B viruses with key neuraminidase inhibitor resistance mutations

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

An influenza B virus plasmid-based rescue system was used to introduce site-specific mutations, previously observed in neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor-resistant viruses, into the NA protein of six recombinant viruses. Three mutations observed only among in vitro selected zanamivir-resistant influenza A mutants were introduced into the B/Beijing/1/87 virus NA protein, to change residue E116 to glycine, alanine or aspartic acid. Residue E116 was also mutated to valine, a mutation found in the clinic among oseltamivir-resistant viruses. An arginine to lysine change at position 291 (292 N2 numbering) mimicked that seen frequently in influenza A N2 clinical isolates resistant to oseltamivir. Similarly, an arginine to lysine change at position 149 (152 in N2 numbering) was made to reproduce the change found in the only reported zanamivir-resistant clinical isolate of influenza B virus. In vitro selection and prolonged treatment in the clinic leads to resistance pathways that require compensatory mutations in the haemagglutinin gene, but these appear not to be important for mutants isolated from immunocompetent patients. The reverse genetics system was therefore used to generate mutants containing only the NA mutation.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of a virus containing the E116G mutation, mutant viruses were attenuated to different levels in comparison with wild-type virus. This attenuation was a result of altered NA activity or stability depending on the introduced mutation. Mutant viruses displayed increased resistance to zanamivir, oseltamivir and peramivir, with certain viruses displaying cross-resistance to all three drugs.

Resistant influenza A viruses in children treated with oseltamivir: descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Oseltamivir is an effective inhibitor of influenza virus neuraminidase. Although viruses resistant to oseltamivir emerge less frequently than those resistant to amantadine or rimantadine, information on oseltamivir-resistant viruses arising during clinical use of the drug in children is limited. Our aim was to investigate oseltamivir resistance in a group of children treated for influenza.

METHODS

We analysed influenza A viruses (H3N2) collected from 50 children before and during treatment with oseltamivir. We sequenced the genes for neuraminidase and haemagglutinin and studied the mutant neuraminidases for their sensitivity to oseltamivir carboxylate.

FINDINGS

We found neuraminidase mutations in viruses from nine patients (18%), six of whom had mutations at position 292 (Arg292Lys) and two at position 119 (Glu119Val), which are known to confer resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors. We also identified another mutation (Asn294Ser) in one patient. Sensitivity testing to oseltamivir carboxylate revealed that the neuraminidases of viruses that have an Arg292Lys, Glu119Val, or Asn294Ser mutation were about 10(4)-10(5)-fold, 500-fold, or 300-fold more resistant than their pretreatment neuraminidases, respectively. Oseltamivir-resistant viruses were first detected at day 4 of treatment and on each successive day of the study. More than 10(3) infectious units per mL of virus were detected in some of the patients who did not shed drug-resistant viruses, even after 5 days of treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Oseltamivir-resistant mutants in children being treated for influenza with oseltamivir arise more frequently than previously reported. Furthermore, children can be a source of viral transmission, even after 5 days of treatment with oseltamivir.

Susceptibility of human influenza viruses from Australasia and South East Asia to the neuraminidase inhibitors zanamivir and oseltamivir

Human influenza viruses isolated from Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) and South East Asia were analysed to determine their sensitivity to the NA inhibitor drugs, zanamivir and oseltamivir. A total of 532 strains isolated between 1998 and 2002 were tested using a fluorescence-based assay to measure the relative inhibition of NA activity over a range of drug concentrations. Based on median IC50 values, influenza A viruses (with neuraminidase subtypes N1 and N2) were more sensitive to both the NA inhibitors than were influenza B strains. Influenza A viruses with a N1 subtype and influenza B strains both demonstrated a greater sensitivity to zanamivir than to oseltamivir carboxylate, whereas influenza A strains with a N2 subtype were more susceptible to oseltamivir carboxylate. For each of the neuraminidase types, IC50 values for viruses from Australasia and South East Asia were found to be comparable. Based on the data prior to and following the licensing of the drugs into the respective regions, the use of the NA inhibitors did not appear to have a significant impact on the susceptibility of the viruses tested to zanamivir or oseltamivir carboxylate.

Surveillance of influenza isolates for susceptibility to neuraminidase inhibitors during the 2000–2002 influenza seasons

Neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors (NI) have recently been licensed for the prophylaxis and treatment of influenza virus infection in humans. This study has utilized a new chemiluminescent (CL) neuraminidase assay to routinely monitor more than a thousand influenza field isolates collected worldwide during the 2000-2002 seasons for susceptibility to both licensed NIs, zanamivir, and oseltamivir by determining the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50). Our data demonstrated that influenza A viruses of the N2 subtype were less susceptible to zanamivir, but not oseltamivir, than those of the N1 subtype such that 41 of 45 confirmed H1N2 isolates could be reliably differentiated from H1N1 viruses based on their zanamivir susceptibility. Pre-titration of influenza A viruses appeared to have no effect on IC50 determined for either NI, while pre-titration of influenza B viruses significantly reduced oseltamivir IC50 and increased zanamivir IC50. Influenza B viruses were less susceptible to either compound than type A isolates. The CL assay is a rapid and reliable method for screening large numbers of influenza isolates for NI susceptibility. Reassortant viruses of the H1N2 subtype that started to circulate worldwide during the 2001-2002 season can be reliably separated from H1N1 viruses based on their zanamivir susceptibility, enabling large scale screening of H1 isolates for determining the prevalence of such reassortants.

Molecular mechanisms of influenza virus resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors

A wide use of inhibitors of influenza virus neuraminidase (NAIs) to control influenza in humans demands a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the resistance emergence. In vitro studies demonstrate that both neuraminidase (NA) and hemagglutinin (HA) influence virus susceptibility to NAIs. Drug resistance conferred due to changes in the NA could be monitored in the NA inhibition assays. Zanamivir-selected viruses acquired the NA substitutions at residues 119 and 292; oseltamivir-selected--at 274 and 292; peramivir-selected--at 292; and A-315675-selected--at 119. The HA binding efficiency and therefore susceptibility to NAIs are affected by the amino acids forming the HA receptor-binding site, the location and number of oligosaccharide chains, and structure of the neuraminic acid-containing cellular receptors. The lack of suitable cell culture-based assays hampers the assessment of virus susceptibility in humans. Emergence of the viruses with the NAI-induced substitutions in the NA is uncommon in drug-treated humans, however a compromised state of the immune system promotes emergence of drug resistance. In vivo, the zanamivir-selected mutant contained a substitution at 152 (B/NA); the oseltamivir-selected mutants-at residues 119 (A/N2), 198 (B/NA), 274 (A/N1), and 292 (A/N2). Substitutions in the NA were often accompanied by impairment of virus infectivity and virulence in animal models. Because of complexity of mechanisms of virus resistance, further analysis of the viruses recovered from the drug-treated humans is warranted.

A Reverse Genetics Study of Resistance to Neuraminidase Inhibitors in An Influenza A/H1N1 Virus

A system of reverse genetics was used to generate influenza A/H1N1 viruses harbouring neuraminidase (NA) mutations previously associated with resistance to NA inhibitors in various viral subtypes. The His274Tyr and Glu119Gln mutants were rescued whereas the Arg292Lys and Glu119→Gly, Val, Ala or Asp mutants could not be generated. In NA inhibition assays, the His274Tyr mutant was resistant to oseltamivir (430-fold over wild-type) and BCX-1812 (50-fold) but was sensitive to zanamivir. A similar trend was seen when the mutant was evaluated by plaque reduction assay (PRA). The Glu119Gln mutant expressed a low level of resistance to oseltamivir (ninefold) and zanamivir (fourfold) in NA inhibition assay but was only marginally resistant to oseltamivir (fourfold) in PRA. The replication capacity of both mutants, in particular that of the His274Tyr virus, was impaired when compared with the wild-type virus in vitro.

Investigation of neuraminidase-substrate recognition using molecular dynamics and free energy calculations

Development of the new generation of therapeutics against the influenza viral coat protein neuraminidase is a response to the continuing threat of influenza epidemics. A variety of structurally similar compounds have been reported that vary greatly in their ability to inhibit neuraminidase, a critical enzyme that cleaves sialic acid and promotes virion release. To determine how neuraminidase exhibits this wide range of affinities with structurally similar compounds, molecular dynamic simulations, coupled with free energy calculations, were used to determine the binding components of a series of neuraminidase inhibitors. Using four cocrystal structures of neuraminidase-inhibitor complexes, we examined the structural and energetic components of ligand potency and selectivity. An in-depth energetic analysis, including internal energy, entropy, and nonbonded interactions, reveals that potency of ligand binding is governed by nonpolar contacts. Electrostatic components generally oppose binding, although two of the best inhibitors use electrostatic interactions to orient the ligand. This investigation suggests that the enhanced selectivity and potency of the better ligands may arise from an improved positioning of their ligand atoms in the active site due to polar and hydrophobic functionalities. Simulations that included crystal water molecules in the active site indicate that the more potent ligands make less use of water-mediated interactions.

Neuraminidase sequence analysis and susceptibilities of influenza virus clinical isolates to zanamivir and oseltamivir

The influenza virus neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors zanamivir and oseltamivir were introduced into clinical practice in various parts of the world between 1999 and 2002. In order to monitor the potential development of resistance, the Neuraminidase Inhibitor Susceptibility Network was established to coordinate testing of clinical isolates collected through the World Health Organization influenza surveillance network from different regions of the world (M. Zambon and F. G. Hayden, Antivir. Res. 49:147-156, 2001). The present study establishes the baseline susceptibilities prior to and shortly after the introduction of the NA inhibitors. Over 1000 clinical influenza isolates recovered from 1996 to 1999 were tested. Susceptibilities were determined by enzyme inhibition assays with chemiluminescent or fluorescent substrates with known NA inhibitor-resistant viruses as controls. The 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)s) depended upon the assay method, the drug tested, and the influenza virus subtype. By both assays, the mean zanamivir IC(50)s were 0.76, 1.82, and 2.28 nM for the subtype H1N1 (N1), H3N2 (N2), and B NAs, respectively, and the oseltamivir IC(50)s were 1.2, 0.5, and 8.8 nM for the N1, N2, and B NAs, respectively. The drug susceptibilities of known zanamivir- and oseltamivir-resistant viruses with the NA mutations E119V, R292K, H274Y, and R152K fell well outside the 95% confidence limits of the IC(50)s for all natural isolates. Sequence analysis of the NAs of viruses for which the IC(50)s were above the 95% confidence limits and several control isolates for which the IC(50)s were in the normal range revealed variations in some previously conserved residues, including D151, A203, T225, and E375 (N2 numbering). Known resistance mutations are both influenza virus subtype and drug specific, but there was no evidence of naturally occurring resistance to either drug in any of the isolates.

A point mutation in influenza B neuraminidase confers resistance to peramivir and loss of slow binding

The influenza neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors peramivir, oseltamivir, and zanamivir are potent inhibitors of NAs from both influenza A and B strains. In general, these inhibitors are slow, tight binders of NA, exhibiting time-dependent inhibition. A mutant of influenza virus B/Yamagata/16/88 which was resistant to peramivir was generated by passage of the virus in tissue culture, in the presence of increasing concentrations (0.1-120 microM over 15 passages) of the compound. Whereas the wild type (WT) virus was inhibited by peramivir with an EC(50) value of 0.10 microM, virus isolated at passages 3 and 15 displayed EC(50) values of 10 and >50 microM, respectively. Passage 3 virus contained 3 hemagglutinin (HA) mutations, but no NA mutation. Passage 15 (P15R) virus contained an additional 3 HA mutations, plus the NA mutation His273Tyr. The mechanism of inhibition of WT and P15R NA by peramivir was examined in enzyme assays. The WT and P15R NAs displayed IC(50) values of 8.4+/-0.4 and 127+/-16 nM, respectively, for peramivir. Peramivir inhibited the WT enzyme in a time-dependent fashion, with a K(i) value of 0.066+/-0.002nM. In contrast, the P15R enzyme did not display the property of slow binding and was inhibited competitively with a K(i) value of 4.69+/-0.44nM. Molecular modeling suggested that His273 was relatively distant from peramivir (>5A) in the NA active site, but that Tyr273 introduced a repulsive interaction between the enzyme and inhibitor, which may have been responsible for peramivir resistance.

Neurovirulence in mice of H5N1 influenza virus genotypes isolated from Hong Kong poultry in 2001

We studied the pathogenicity of five different genotypes (A to E) of highly pathogenic avian H5N1 viruses, which contained HA genes similar to those of the H5N1 virus A/goose/Guangdong/1/96 and five different combinations of "internal" genes, in a mouse model. Highly pathogenic, neurotropic variants of genotypes A, C, D, and E were isolated from the brain after a single intranasal passage in mice. Genotype B virus was isolated from lungs only. The mouse brain variants had amino acid changes in all gene products except PB1, NP, and NS1 proteins but no common sets of mutations. We conclude that the original H5N1/01 isolates of genotypes A, C, D, and E were heterogeneous and that highly pathogenic neurotropic variants can be rapidly selected in mice.

Mechanism by which mutations at his274 alter sensitivity of influenza a virus n1 neuraminidase to oseltamivir carboxylate and zanamivir

Oseltamivir carboxylate is a potent and specific inhibitor of influenza neuraminidase (NA). An influenza A/H1N1 variant selected in vitro with reduced susceptibility to oseltamivir carboxylate contains a His274Tyr mutation. To understand the mechanism by which a His274Tyr mutation gives rise to drug resistance, we studied a series of NA variant proteins containing various substitutions at position 274. Replacement of His274 with larger side chain residues (Tyr or Phe) reduced the NA sensitivity to oseltamivir carboxylate. In contrast, replacement of His274 with smaller side chain residues (Gly, Asn, Ser, and Gln) resulted in enhanced or unchanged sensitivity to oseltamivir carboxylate. Previous studies have suggested that the slow-binding inhibition of NA by oseltamivir carboxylate is a result of the reorientation of Glu276. Loss of this slow-binding inhibition in the His274Tyr and His274Phe mutant NA but not in His274Asn, His274Gly, His274Ser, or His274Gln supports the conclusion that the conformational change of Glu276 is restricted in the His274Tyr and His274Phe mutant NA upon oseltamivir carboxylate binding. Interestingly, His274Asn, as well as His274Gly, His274Ser, and His274Gln, also displayed reduced sensitivity to zanamivir and its analogue, 4-amino-Neu5Ac2en. Substitution of His274 with Tyr in influenza A/Tokyo/3/67 (H3N2) recombinant NA did not affect the susceptibility to oseltamivir carboxylate. These data indicate that the volume occupied by the amino acid side chain at position 274 can influence the sensitivities of influenza N1 NA but not of N2 NA to both oseltamivir carboxylate and zanamivir.

The value of polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of viral respiratory tract infections in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Respiratory viruses cause severe infections in lung transplant recipients, which require rapid and accurate diagnosis for appropriate management.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the added benefit of a multiplex PCR for respiratory viruses (influenza [FLU] A and B, respiratory syncytial virus [RSV] A and B and parainfluenza virus [PIV] 1, 2, and 3) complementing rapid respiratory viral culture (RRV) and FLU-A antigen detection (EIA) in this transplant population.

RESULTS

Over 6 months, 116 nasal washes and bronchoalveolar lavages, obtained from 72 lung transplant recipients with symptoms of upper or lower respiratory tract infections, were tested in real time by RRV and FLU-A EIA, and batched frozen by PCR. One or more methods recognized a respiratory virus in 31 (27%) specimens, including 15 FLU-A, nine RSV and seven PIV. PCR identified 26 of 31 positive samples demonstrating a sensitivity of 84%, higher than RRV (67%) or EIA (54%). PCR, RRV and EIA detected 60, 80 and 54%, respectively, FLU-A samples. PCR and RRV were equivalent for RSV-A, PIV-2 and 3, but PCR found a significantly higher number of RSV-B and PIV-1.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that routine use of PCR will enhance the number and speed with which viral respiratory tract infections are diagnosed in lung transplant recipients.

In vitro selection and characterization of influenza A (A/N9) virus variants resistant to a novel neuraminidase inhibitor, A-315675

With the recent introduction of neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors into clinical practice for the treatment of influenza virus infections, considerable attention has been focused on the potential for resistance development and cross-resistance between different agents from this class. A-315675 is a novel influenza virus NA inhibitor that has potent enzyme activity and is highly active in cell culture against a variety of strains of influenza A and B viruses. To further assess the therapeutic potential of this compound, in vitro resistance studies have been conducted and a comparative assessment has been made relative to oseltamivir carboxylate. The development of viral resistance to A-315675 was studied by in vitro serial passage of influenza A/N9 virus strains grown in MDCK cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of A-315675. Parallel passaging experiments were conducted with oseltamivir carboxylate, the active form of a currently marketed oral agent for the treatment of influenza virus infections. Passage experiments with A-315675 identified a variant at passage 8 that was 60-fold less susceptible to the compound. Sequencing of the viral population identified an E119D mutation in the NA gene, but no mutations were observed in the hemagglutinin (HA) gene. However, by passage 10 (2.56 microM A-315675), two mutations (R233K, S339P) in the HA gene appeared in addition to the E119D mutation in the NA gene, resulting in a 310-fold-lower susceptibility to A-315675. Further passaging at higher drug concentrations had no effect on the generation of further NA or HA mutations (20.5 microM A-315675). This P15 virus displayed 355-fold-lower susceptibility to A-315675 and >175-fold-lower susceptibility to zanamivir than did wild-type virus, but it retained a high degree of susceptibility to oseltamivir carboxylate. By comparison, virus variants recovered from passaging against oseltamivir carboxylate (passage 14) harbored an E119V mutation and displayed a 6,000-fold-lower susceptibility to oseltamivir carboxylate and a 175-fold-lower susceptibility to zanamivir than did wild-type virus. Interestingly, this mutant still retained susceptibility to A-315675 (42-fold loss). This suggests that cross-resistance between A-315675- and oseltamivir carboxylate-selected variants in vitro is minimal.

Functional balance between haemagglutinin and neuraminidase in influenza virus infections

Influenza A and B viruses carry two surface glycoproteins, the haemagglutinin (HA) and the neuraminidase (NA). Both proteins have been found to recognise the same host cell molecule, sialic acid. HA binds to sialic acid-containing receptors on target cells to initiate virus infection, whereas NA cleaves sialic acids from cellular receptors and extracellular inhibitors to facilitate progeny virus release and to promote the spread of the infection to neighbouring cells. Numerous studies performed recently have revealed that an optimal interplay between these receptor-binding and receptor-destroying activities of the surface glycoproteins is required for efficient virus replication. An existing balance between the antagonistic HA and NA functions of individual viruses can be disturbed by various events, such as reassortment, virus transmission to a new host, or therapeutic inhibition of neuraminidase. The resulting decrease in the viral replicative fitness is usually overcome by restoration of the functional balance due to compensatory mutations in HA, NA or both proteins.

Influenza virus carrying an R292K mutation in the neuraminidase gene is not transmitted in ferrets

A model of influenza transmission has been established in ferrets in which wild-type influenza infection in a donor ferret can be transmitted sequentially to other ferrets. We have studied the transmission in ferrets of a clinical isolate of A/Sydney/5/97 (H3N2) carrying the neuraminidase 292K mutation compared with the corresponding wild-type virus from the same subject. Donor ferrets (n=four per group) were inoculated intranasally with mutant or wild-type virus and each housed with three naïve contact ferrets. All donor ferrets inoculated with wildtype virus were productively infected and transmitted virus to all 12 contacts, who in turn had high viral titres in their nasal washes. In contrast, only two of the donor ferrets inoculated with mutant virus were productively infected. There was little or no evidence that the two infected donor animals transmitted mutant virus to their contact animals. This ferret model has demonstrated that the mutant influenza virus with lysine at position 292 of the neuraminidase is of reduced infectivity and does not transmit under conditions in which the wild-type virus with arginine at position 292 readily transmits.

Influenza virus carrying neuraminidase with reduced sensitivity to oseltamivir carboxylate has altered properties in vitro and is compromised for infectivity and replicative ability in vivo

Oseltamivir phosphate (Tamiflu, Ro 64-0796) is the first orally administered neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor approved for use in treatment and prevention of influenza virus infection in man. Oseltamivir phosphate is the pro-drug of the active metabolite oseltamivir carboxylate (Ro 64-0802). Extensive monitoring throughout the oseltamivir development programme has identified a very low incidence of patients who have carried drug-resistant virus. The predominant mutation seen is the substitution of arginine for lysine at position 292 of the viral NA. The fitness of clinically isolated influenza virus A/Sydney/5/97 (H3N2) carrying this mutation was markedly reduced in animal models of influenza virus infection. The infectivity and replicative abilities of R292K mutant virus were reduced by at least 2 logs in a mouse model of influenza infection and by 2 and 4 logs, respectively, in the ferret model. Pathogenicity of R292K influenza virus A/Sydney/5/97 was reduced in ferrets as measured by inflammatory and febrile responses at least in parallel to the decrease in replicative ability. The data indicate that the R292K NA mutation compromises viral fitness such that virus carrying this mutation is unlikely to be of significant clinical consequence in man.

Antiviral therapy of influenza

The prevention of influenza virus infections by the use of vaccines remains the most cost-effective and practical method of influenza virus control, but the use of antiviral prophylaxis and treatment in certain populations or high-risk individuals is also possible. Four antiviral drugs are currently licensed in the United States for the treatment and/or prevention of influenza virus infection in children. The M2 blockers, (amantadine and rimantadine) have been licensed for the prophylaxis and treatment of influenza in diverse high-risk populations, including children, for years. Advantages of these agents include the low cost, high oral bioavailability, and relative tolerability of one of these agents (rimantadine) in children. Disadvantages include efficacy against influenza A viruses only (not type B), the relative rapid development of resistance, and adverse effects associated with amantadine in particular (especially in the elderly and those with decreased renal function). Two agents in a new antiviral class, the neuraminidase inhibitors, have been licensed recently for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza in the United States. Oseltamivir is licensed for the treatment of influenza in children older than 1 year and for the prophylaxis in children older than 13 years. This drug is safe and well-tolerated, and is available in capsules or a liquid suspension. Another neuraminidase inhibitor, zanamivir, is administered as an inhaled powder via a special inhaler device and is licensed for the treatment of influenza in children older than 7 years. Both neuraminidase inhibitors appear to be similarly effective and are not associated with the development of antiviral resistance. No direct comparisons of any of these antiviral agents has been performed; all result in clinical improvement approximately 1 to 2 days earlier in otherwise healthy children when therapy is initiated within 48 hours of onset of symptoms.

Prolonged excretion of amantadine-resistant influenza a virus quasi species after cessation of antiviral therapy in an immunocompromised patient

Phenotypic and molecular studies were conducted to characterize multiple influenza A isolates recovered from an immunocompromised patient who died of viral and fungal pneumonitis. The recovery of amantadine-resistant isolates was correlated with the detection of 2 drug-resistant M2 variants (codons 27 and 31) in combination with a wild-type virus. The mutant viruses persisted within the viral population in variable proportions >1 month after cessation of antiviral therapy. These results confirm animal studies reported elsewhere regarding the genetic stability of influenza M2 mutants and their potential for transmission in humans.

Detection of influenza virus resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors by an enzyme inhibition assay

We previously characterized influenza viruses whose selection in the presence of neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors resulted in a substituted residue (position 119,152,274, or 292) in the NA active center. To identify the most favorable conditions for detecting NA inhibitor-resistant viruses we compared the results of four modifications of the NA inhibition assay utilizing a fluorogenic substrate. The IC50 values were highly dependent upon assay conditions, and most mutant enzymes were more sensitive to changes in assay conditions (e.g. addition of PO4(3-), Ca2+, DMSO, or EDTA) than wild-type enzymes or a mutant NA with an Arg292-->Lys substitution. Although the levels of resistance to zanamivir, oseltamivir carboxylate, and BCX-1812 (RWJ-270201) for each mutant varied among assays, mutants with substitutions at framework residues 119 or 274 exhibited sensitivity to at least one inhibitor. Viruses with substitutions at catalytic residues 152 or 292 were resistant to each inhibitor in all assays. Monitoring resistance in a clinical setting will require a panel of resistant viruses to ensure that assay conditions are favorable for detecting variants with substituted residues in the NA active center. Because variants selected in the presence of one NA inhibitor could be variably resistant to other inhibitors, all three inhibitors should be used in drug susceptibility testing.

RWJ-270201 (BCX-1812): a novel neuraminidase inhibitor for influenza

The influenza virus neuraminidase (NA) is important in the pathogenesis of infection and, thus, is an attractive target for agents used in the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza. This article describes preclinical and early clinical data related to RWJ-270201 (BCX-1812), a novel, orally active NA inhibitor that was rationally designed for having potent and selective activity against influenza A and B viruses. RWJ-270201 is a unique NA inhibitor with a cyclopentane ring structure and high selectivity for the influenza NA. RWJ-270201 has efficacy comparable to or better than earlier NA inhibitors against a wide range of influenza A and B isolates, including recently emerged and avian strains, both in vitro and in a lethal murine model of influenza. Based on the high selectivity and efficacy of RWJ-270201 against both type A and B influenza strains in preclinical studies as well as murine pharmacodynamic studies supporting the potential for once-daily administration, clinical trials were initiated in order to determine the tolerability and antiviral activity of RWJ-270201 in humans. To date, clinical studies have indicated that RWJ-270201 is well tolerated and has antiviral activity in human experimental influenza models when administered orally once daily.

Treatment of influenza with neuraminidase inhibitors: virological implications

Evaluation of the emergence of influenza virus resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) is now demanded following experience with amantadinamines. Preliminary data have indicated that NAI-resistant virus is unlikely to emerge readily in the clinic and this is consistent with the difficulty experienced in selecting resistant virus in vitro. Resistance mutations can occur in both neuraminidase and haemagglutinin genes. The neuraminidase mutations are viral subtype specific and, therefore, clinically relevant subtypes must be employed for in vitro studies if pre-clinical data are to have predictive value. Haemagglutinin mutations generated in vitro are probably both subtype and cell culture system specific and, therefore, may not be predictive of clinical findings. Analysis of influenza-positive samples from NAI-treated patients in the clinical setting must include samples from late treatment time-points (day 4 and later) in order for resistant virus to be detected as in vitro studies and current clinical experience have indicated that resistant virus is slow to emerge and is transient.

Comparison of the activities of zanamivir, oseltamivir, and RWJ-270201 against clinical isolates of influenza virus and neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant variants

RWJ-270201 is a novel cyclopentane inhibitor of influenza A and B virus neuraminidases (NAs). We compared the ability of RWJ-270201 to inhibit NA activity of clinical influenza isolates and viruses with defined resistance mutations with that of zanamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate. In NA inhibition assays with influenza A viruses, the median 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) of RWJ-270201 (approximately 0.34 nM) was comparable to that of oseltamivir carboxylate (0.45 nM) but lower than that of zanamivir (0.95 nM). For influenza B virus isolates, the IC(50) of RWJ-270201 (1.36 nM) was comparable to that of zanamivir (2.7 nM) and less than that of oseltamivir carboxylate (8.5 nM). A zanamivir-resistant variant bearing a Glu119-to-Gly (Glu119-->Gly) or Glu119-->Ala substitution in an NA (N2) remained susceptible to RWJ-270201 and oseltamivir carboxylate. However, a zanamivir-selected variant with an Arg292-->Lys substitution in an NA (N2) showed a moderate level of resistance to RWJ-270201 (IC(50) = 30 nM) and zanamivir (IC(50) = 20 nM) and a high level of resistance to oseltamivir carboxylate (IC(50) > 3,000 nM). The zanamivir-resistant influenza B virus variant bearing an Arg152-->Lys substitution was resistant to each NA inhibitor (IC(50) = 100 to 750 nM). The oseltamivir-selected variant (N1) with the His274-->Tyr substitution exhibited resistance to oseltamivir carboxylate (IC(50) = 400 nM) and to RWJ-270201 (IC(50) = 40 nM) but retained full susceptibility to zanamivir (IC(50) = 1.5 nM). Thus, drug-resistant variants with substitutions in framework residues 119 or 274 can retain susceptibility to other NA inhibitors, whereas replacement of functional residue 152 or 292 leads to variable levels of cross-resistance. We conclude that RWJ-270201 is a potent inhibitor of NAs of wild-type and some zanamivir-resistant or oseltamivir-resistant influenza A and B virus variants.

Anti-influenza drugs and neuraminidase inhibitors

Each year, influenza viruses are responsible for considerable illness, complications and mortality. An effective treatment will have a major impact on the severe personal and economic burden that this disease incurs. There are several points in the influenza life cycle that may be potentially inhibited. One critical point is the release of newly synthesized virions from the host cell surface. Viral neuraminidase (NA) cleaves the virus from host cell sialic acid residues allowing infection of other host cells. Rationally designed NA inhibitors that block the viral life cycle are now in the clinic and these molecules are effective and safe for the treatment of influenza. Compared with other anti-influenza agents the NA inhibitors are well tolerated, effective against all influenza types and there has been little evidence of the emergence of viral resistance. NA inhibitors provide an important new therapeutic weapon for the management of influenza infection.

Anti-influenza drugs and neuraminidase inhibitors

Each year, influenza viruses are responsible for considerable illness, complications and mortality. An effective treatment will have a major impact on the severe personal and economic burden that this disease incurs. There are several points in the influenza life cycle that may be potentially inhibited. One critical point is the release of newly synthesized virions from the host cell surface. Viral neuraminidase (NA) cleaves the virus from host cell sialic acid residues allowing infection of other host cells. Rationally designed NA inhibitors that block the viral life cycle are now in the clinic and these molecules are effective and safe for the treatment of influenza. Compared with other anti-influenza agents the NA inhibitors are well tolerated, effective against all influenza types and there has been little evidence of the emergence of viral resistance. NA inhibitors provide an important new therapeutic weapon for the management of influenza infection.

A single amino acid alteration in the human parainfluenza virus type 3 hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein confers resistance to the inhibitory effects of zanamivir on receptor binding and neuraminidase activity

Entry and fusion of human parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPF3) requires interaction of the viral hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) glycoprotein with its sialic acid receptor. 4-Guanidino-2,4-dideoxy-2,3-dehydro-N-acetylneuraminic acid (4-GU-DANA; zanamivir), a sialic acid transition-state analog designed to fit the influenza virus neuraminidase catalytic site, possesses antiviral activity at nanomolar concentrations in vitro. We have shown previously that 4-GU-DANA also inhibits both HN-mediated binding of HPF3 to host cell receptors and HN's neuraminidase activity. In the present study, a 4-GU-DANA-resistant HPF3 virus variant (ZM1) was generated by serial passage in the presence of 4-GU-DANA. ZM1 exhibited a markedly fusogenic plaque morphology and harbored two HN gene mutations resulting in two amino acid alterations, T193I and I567V. Another HPF3 variant studied in parallel, C-0, shared an alteration at T193 and exhibited similar plaque morphology but was not resistant to 4-GU-DANA. Neuraminidase assays revealed a 15-fold reduction in 4-GU-DANA sensitivity for ZM1 relative to the wild type (WT) and C-0. The ability of ZM1 to bind sialic acid receptors was inhibited 10-fold less than for both WT and C-0 in the presence of 1 mM 4-GU-DANA. ZM1 also retained infectivity at 15-fold-higher concentrations of 4-GU-DANA than WT and C-0. A single amino acid alteration at HN residue 567 confers these 4-GU-DANA-resistant properties. An understanding of ZM1 and other escape variants provides insight into the effects of this small molecule on HN function as well as the role of the HN glycoprotein in HPF3 pathogenesis.

Zanamivir: a rational approach to influenza B

Influenza B viruses have co-circulated with the HIN1 and H3N2 subtypes of influenza A since 1977. Influenza A viruses are found in various animals, whereas influenza B viruses are probably restricted to humans. The lack of an animal reservoir means that the virus has no potential for genetic reassortment across species. In addition, influenza B viruses are more serologically homogeneous than influenza A viruses. Thus, the chance of influenza B causing a pandemic is much lower than that of influenza A. However, influenza B viruses are still a frequent cause of local disease outbreaks and epidemics as a result of antigenic drift. Any prophylactic or therapeutic measure must, therefore, be effective against both influenza A and B viruses. Zanamivir is the first widely approved neuraminidase inhibitor for the treatment of influenza. It is delivered directly to the primary site of viral replication, the respiratory tract, and is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of both influenza A and B. Data in prophylaxis are also encouraging. Zanamivir is the only drug proven to be clinically effective against both influenza A and B virus infections.

Neuraminidase inhibitors: zanamivir and oseltamivir

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of zanamivir and oseltamivir for the prophylaxis and treatment of influenza.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search restricted to English-language journals was conducted (1980-May 2000).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All efficacy and safety trials were included if conducted in humans and published in a journal. Abstracts were included if no other data source was available.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Zanamivir and oseltamivir block influenza neuraminidase and prevent the cleavage of sialic acid residues, thus interfering with progeny virus dispersement within the mucosal secretions and reducing viral infectivity. The neuraminidase trials for prophylaxis and treatment of influenza enrolled predominantly young (mean age 29-37 y), healthy, mostly unvaccinated individuals who were at the lowest risk of influenza and its complications. When zanamivir 10 mg inhaled twice daily or oseltamivir 75 mg orally twice daily were used for treatment, systemic symptoms such as myalgias, fever, and headache were reduced by approximately 0.7-1.5 days. Greater efficacy (symptom reduction by 1.5-2.0 d) was noted in proven cases of influenza infection, in febrile patients, and in patients who received the treatment medication within 30 hours of symptom onset. Clinical efficacy did not increase when doses higher than the treatment dose approved by the Food and Drug Administration were used. When given for prophylaxis, zanamivir 10 mg inhaled once daily or oseltamivir 75 mg orally once daily was used for four to six weeks and achieved protective clinical efficacy for laboratory-confirmed influenza ranging from 67% to 74%, depending on whether culture or serologic tests were performed. The most common adverse effects (usually < 5%) included upper respiratory tract symptoms. Patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who received zanamivir had an increased incidence of a > 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in one second or peak expiratory flow rates. Headaches, nausea, and vomiting were more frequent in the oseltamivir groups than in placebo groups. The most common gastrointestinal adverse effects, nausea and vomiting, were reduced to approximately 10% by administering the medication with food.

CONCLUSIONS

Zanamivir and oseltamivir are more effective in preventing culture-positive influenza or for treatment of culture-positive influenza in febrile (> or = 37.8 degrees C) individuals. Treatment is more effective if initiated within 30 hours of symptom onset in febrile individuals; however, it is difficult to meet these criteria. More realistically, clinical efficacy is closer to 60-70% and, for treatment started within 48 hours for laboratory-confirmed influenza, symptom reduction is approximately 0.7-1.5 days. If used appropriately to minimize the development of resistance, the neuraminidase inhibitors represent a new and unique class of antiinfluenza agents that can potentially reduce the morbidity associated with influenza.

Inhaled zanamivir for the prevention of influenza in families. Zanamivir Family Study Group

BACKGROUND

As prophylaxis against influenza in families, amantadine and rimantadine have had inconsistent effectiveness, partly because of the transmission of drug-resistant variants from treated index patients. We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of inhaled zanamivir for the treatment and prevention of influenza in families.

METHODS

We enrolled families (with two to five members and at least one child who was five years of age or older) before the 1998-1999 influenza season. If an influenza-like illness developed in one member, the family was randomly assigned to receive either inhaled zanamivir or placebo. The family member with the index illness was treated with either 10 mg of inhaled zanamivir (163 subjects) or placebo (158) twice a day for 5 days, and the other family members received either 10 mg of zanamivir (414 subjects) or placebo (423) once a day as prophylaxis for 10 days. The primary end point was the proportion of families in which at least one household contact had symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza.

RESULTS

The proportion of families with at least one initially healthy household contact in whom influenza developed was smaller in the zanamivir group than in the placebo group (4 percent vs. 19 percent, P<0.001); the difference represented a 79 percent reduction in the proportion of families with at least one affected contact. Zanamivir provided protection against both influenza A and influenza B. A neuraminidase-inhibition assay and sequencing of the neuraminidase and hemagglutinin genes revealed no zanamivir-resistant variants. Among the subjects with index cases of laboratory-confirmed influenza, the median duration of symptoms was 2.5 days shorter in the zanamivir group than in the placebo group (5.0 vs. 7.5 days, P=0.01). Zanamivir was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

When combined with the treatment of index cases, prophylactic treatment of family members with once-daily inhaled zanamivir is well tolerated and prevents the development of influenza. In this study there was no evidence of the emergence of resistant influenza variants.

In vitro and in vivo assay systems for study of influenza virus inhibitors

Evaluation of potential influenza virus inhibitors may utilize multiple steps. First would be to determine if the viral target (e.g. influenza virus neuraminidase) being focused upon will be inhibited in the appropriate assay. Standard in vitro antiviral assays, used next in antiviral evaluations, may utilize inhibition of viral plaques, viral cytopathic effect (CPE), and viral hemagglutinin or other protein, with inhibition of viral yield used in follow-up evaluations. The CPE can be determined visually and by dye uptake. Animal models used for study of potential influenza virus inhibitors include the ferret, the laboratory mouse, and the chicken, with a variety of parameters used to indicate the severity of the infection and its inhibition by therapy. Multiple parameters are recommended in any in vivo antiviral evaluation. The ferret and the mouse infection models have been useful in studying the development of drug resistance and the relative virulence of drug-resistant viruses. The influenza mouse model has also been of value for the evaluation of immunomodulating effects of test compounds and for the study of the utility of antiviral drugs for use against influenza virus infections in the immunocompromised host. In considering the use of any animal model, species differences in drug pharmacology and metabolism must be taken into account. This review has described the systems which have been used most frequently by antiviral investigators, using, as examples, recent studies with the clinically approved influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir.

Dose-dependent changes in influenza virus-infected dendritic cells result in increased allogeneic T-cell proliferation at low, but not high, doses of virus

During the acute phase of infection with influenza A virus, the degree of lymphopenia correlates with severity of disease. Factors that contribute to T-cell activation during influenza virus infection may contribute to this observation. Since the immune response is initiated when dendritic cells (DC) interact with T cells, we have established an in vitro system to examine the effects of influenza virus infection on DC function. Our results show that allogeneic T-cell proliferation was dependent on the dose of A/PR/8/34 used to infect DC, with enhanced responses at low, but not high, multiplicities of infection. The lack of enhancement at high virus doses was not primarily due to the increased rate of DC apoptosis, but required viral replication and neuraminidase (NA) activity. Clusters that formed between DC or between DC and T cells were also dependent on the viral dose. This change in cellular interaction may oppose T-cell proliferation in response to DC infected with high doses of PR8, since the increased contact between DC resulted in the exclusion of T cells. The enhanced alloreactive T-cell response was restored by neutralization of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1). It is likely that NA present on viral particles released from DC infected with high doses of PR8 activates TGF-beta1. Future studies will determine the mechanism by which TGF-beta1 modifies the in vitro T-cell response and address the contribution of this cytokine to the lymphopenia observed in severe disease.

Influenza virus genetics

Significant progress has been made in understanding the process of influenza A virus replication in cell culture; however, much less is known about the genetic control of virus-host interactions in disease. This review provides an overview of the genetic analysis of influenza virus biology. The functional map of the individual genes of influenza A virus is presented as well as the status of our current understanding of pathogenesis. Influenza has a segmented genome so it is possible to obtain reassortants that contain novel combinations of genome segments derived from different viruses. This is a very useful genetic tool and is also an important aspect of influenza evolution and biology. Human influenza viruses originate from avian strains of influenza virus so that influenza infection is at its basis a zoonosis. Influenza virus strains are host-restricted, however, and avian strains must be adapted to the human host. So questions of host-range and interaction with host factors are important determinants of the ability of influenza virus to cause disease in humans. Host-range is restricted primarily due to host-specific interactions of the ribonucleocapsid and the viral receptor. There are two classes of drugs for inhibiting influenza infection, amantadine HCl and neuraminidase inhibitors. The mode of action and basis for resistance to these drugs are presented. Prospective targets for antiviral therapy are also discussed.

Development of a sensitive chemiluminescent neuraminidase assay for the determination of influenza virus susceptibility to zanamivir

Determination of the sensitivity of influenza viruses to neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors is presently based on assays of NA function because, unlike available cell culture methods, the results of such assays are predictive of susceptibility in vivo. At present the most widely used substrate in assays of NA function is the fluorogenic reagent 2'-O-(4-methylumbelliferyl)-N-acetylneuraminic acid (MUN). A rapid assay with improved sensitivity is required because a proportion of clinical isolates has insufficient NA to be detectable in the current fluorogenic assay, and because some mutations associated with resistance to NA inhibitors reduce the activity of the enzyme. A chemiluminescence-based assay of NA activity has been developed that uses a 1,2-dioxetane derivative of sialic acid (NA-STAR) as the substrate. When compared with the fluorogenic assay, use of the NA-STAR substrate results in a 67-fold reduction in the limit of detection of the NA assay, from 200 pM (11 fmol) NA to 3 pM (0.16 fmol) NA. A panel of isolates from phase 2 clinical studies of zanamivir, which were undetectable in the fluorogenic assay, was tested for activity using the NA-STAR substrate. Of these 12 isolates with undetectable NA activity, 10 (83%) were found to have detectable NA activity using the NA-STAR substrate. A comparison of sensitivity to zanamivir of a panel of influenza A and B viruses using the two NA assay methods has been performed. IC(50) values for zanamivir using the NA-STAR were in the range 1.0-7.5 nM and those for the fluorogenic assay in the range 1. 0-5.7 nM (n = 6). The NA-STAR assay is a highly sensitive, rapid assay of influenza virus NA activity that is applicable to monitoring the susceptibility of influenza virus clinical isolates to NA inhibitors.

Influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors

Neuraminidase promotes influenza virus release from infected cells and facilitates virus spread within the respiratory tract. Several potent and specific inhibitors of this enzyme have been developed, and two (zanamivir and oseltamivir) have been approved for human use. Unlike amantadine and rimantadine that target the M2 protein of influenza A viruses, these drugs inhibit replication of both influenza A and B viruses. Zanamivir is delivered by inhalation because of its low oral bioavailability whereas oseltamivir is administered by mouth. Early treatment with either drug reduces the severity and duration of influenza symptoms and associated complications. Both agents are effective for chemoprophylaxis. Because of a broader antiviral spectrum, better tolerance, and less potential for emergence of resistance than is seen with the M2 inhibitors, the neuraminidase inhibitors represent an important advance in the treatment of influenza.

Monitoring of viral susceptibility: new challenges with the development of influenza NA inhibitors

With the clinical development of anti-viral agents, monitoring for the continued susceptibility of wild-type strains has become important in disease management. Various methods have been used to monitor viral susceptibility; the advantages and disadvantages of which depend on the virus, the target and the scale of the research being undertaken. The plaque-reduction assay is valuable for measuring susceptibility of most viruses but is not ideal for large-scale monitoring. Yield-reduction, measuring specific virus antigens, and dye-uptake assays, measuring virus cytopathic effects, are more suitable for high-throughput requirements, but the IC(50) value (the concentration that inhibits 50% of virus) varies with the viral inoculum. Surveillance of influenza susceptibility to rimantadine/amantadine in the clinic has predominantly used EIA-based assays, since plaquing of influenza clinical isolates is variable. With development of the influenza NA inhibitors it became apparent that current cell-based assays were unsuitable for monitoring susceptibility to this new class of drugs. Variability may result from virus spread directly from cell to cell in culture by-passing the NA function. Furthermore, mutations selected in the HA, while not apparently contributing to phenotypic resistance in vivo, may result in cell-culture based resistance, and may mask NA resistance in cell culture by modifying receptor-binding specificity. One important distinction between NA inhibitors and other antiviral enzyme inhibitors is that both target enzyme and inhibitor work extracellularly. NA assays are therefore most representative of the in vivo situation for monitoring susceptibility, supported by HA sequencing. As the clinical use of NA inhibitors escalates, a major change will be required in approaches used to monitor susceptibility of influenza isolates in virology laboratories world-wide.

Zanamivir susceptibility monitoring and characterization of influenza virus clinical isolates obtained during phase II clinical efficacy studies

Zanamivir is a highly selective neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor with demonstrated clinical efficacy against influenza A and B virus infections. In phase II clinical efficacy trials (NAIB2005 and NAIB2008), virological substudies showed mean reductions in virus shedding after 24 h of treatment of 1.5 to 2.0 log(10) 50% tissue culture infective doses compared to a placebo, with no reemergence of virus after the completion of therapy. Paired isolates (n = 41) obtained before and during therapy with zanamivir demonstrated no shifts in susceptibility to zanamivir when measured by NA assays, although for a few isolates NA activity was too low to evaluate. In plaque reduction assays in MDCK cells, the susceptibility of isolates to zanamivir was extremely variable even at baseline and did not correlate with the speed of resolution of virus shedding. Isolates with apparent limited susceptibility to zanamivir by plaque reduction proved highly susceptible in vivo in the ferret model. Further sequence analysis of paired isolates revealed no changes in the hemagglutinin and NA genes in the majority of isolates. The few changes observed were all natural variants. No amino acid changes that had previously been identified in vitro as being involved with reduced susceptibility to zanamivir were observed. These studies highlighted problems associated with monitoring susceptibility to NA inhibitors in the clinic, in that no reliable cell-based assay is available. At present the NA assay is the best available predictor of susceptibility to NA inhibitors in vivo, as measured in the validated ferret model of infection.

In vitro selection and characterisation of influenza B/Beijing/1/87 isolates with altered susceptibility to zanamivir

We describe the in vitro selection and characterisation of virus derived from B/Beijing/1/87 passaged in the presence of zanamivir. During zanamivir passage, the phenotype of virus isolates was either drug dependent or drug resistant in plaque reduction assays. The susceptibility of the neuraminidase of the drug-dependent isolates was unchanged from that of the wild-type enzyme. The drug-dependent isolates contained two mutations in the viral haemagglutinin: V90A, close to the proposed secondary sialic acid-binding site, and L240Q, close to the primary sialic acid-binding site. Virus isolates that were drug resistant contained the same mutations in the haemagglutinin but also contained the mutation E116G in the neuraminidase. For the drug-dependent viruses, zanamivir susceptibility could not be measured because plaque numbers increased with increasing drug concentration. The in vitro zanamivir susceptibility of drug-resistant viruses was lower than that of the wild-type virus by a factor of 275- to >2532-fold. Neuraminidase containing the E116G mutation has a 33-fold lower affinity for zanamivir than the wild-type enzyme. The finding that the same haemagglutinin mutations are found in both drug-dependent and drug-resistant viruses confirms that the same changes to the receptor binding function can contribute to both phenotypes. This observation demonstrates the interplay between the influenza virus haemagglutinin and neuraminidase in escape from zanamivir inhibition in vitro.

Influenza virus neuraminidase alters allogeneic T cell proliferation

Influenza virus elicits good cellular and humoral immune responses. Unlike the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to many other antigens, the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to influenza virus is CD4(+) T cell independent, suggesting that viral infection of antigen-presenting cells may alter their capacity to stimulate T cell responses. To clarify the role of influenza virus in these functional alterations, we compared T cell responses to uninfected and A/PR/8/34-infected dendritic cells (DC). DC were prepared from the bone marrow of C57BL/6 (H2(b)) mice and used to stimulate in vivo and in vitro alloreactive T cell responses. In both cases, influenza virus infection increased the capacity of DC to stimulate T cell proliferation. This enhancement was blocked by antibodies specific for neuraminidase (NA), but not hemagglutinin. Infection was not required to observe enhanced T cell proliferation, showing that NA from exogeneous virus particles can facilitate this effect. These results are the first to show that influenza virus alters the capacity of DC to stimulate T cell proliferation through mechanisms mediated by viral NA.

Oseltamivir

Oseltamivir is the oral prodrug of GS4071, a selective inhibitor of influenza A and B viral neuraminidase. After absorption from the gastrointestinal tract oseltamivir is efficiently converted to GS4071, which is maintained at high and sustained concentrations in plasma. Based on studies in rats and ferrets, GS4071 appears to be effectively distributed to all tissues, including major sites of infection in the upper and lower respiratory tracts. Oral oseltamivir was an effective treatment in naturally occurring influenza when administered within 36 hours of symptom onset, reducing both the duration and severity of symptoms and the incidence of secondary complications in influenza-infected patients enrolled in 2 large placebo-controlled, double-blind trials. Prophylactic oral administration of oseltamivir was effective in reducing the incidence of influenza illness according to pooled data from 2 large placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of healthy nonimmunised volunteers during periods of seasonal influenza activity. The reported incidence of viral resistance to GS4071 was low in clinical isolates from oseltamivir treatment studies. All known GS4071 resistant genotypes are growth disadvantaged and display significantly reduced infectivity in animals. Oseltamivir was well tolerated in human volunteers and patients in clinical trials. Treatment-related adverse events (primarily gastrointestinal) were mild and transient in nature.

Recent progress in anti-influenza chemotherapy

Influenza virus infections in high risk individuals, such as infants, the elderly, and patients with cardiopulmonary disorders or immunocompromised states, cause severe manifestations which often result in fatalities. The emergence of a new antigen type of influenza A virus (H5N1) in Hong Kong during 1997 and 1998 threatened a possible pandemic of a new influenza infection. The investigation for anti-influenza chemotherapies has progressed in the last decade whereas clinical trials of new compounds have been limited to amantadine, rimantadine and ribavirin. Fusion inhibitors which directly inhibit conformational change of haemagglutinin (HA), protease inhibitors which inhibit cleavage of HA to HA1 and HA2, RNA transcription inhibitors which inhibit cap formation of mRNA and antisense oligonucleotides targeted at mRNA of PB2 (a part of viral RNA polymerase) have been reported, in their development phases. Recently, 2 neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors, zanamivir and oseltamivir (GS 4104), were used in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with influenza. Both agents showed promising results. A polyoxometalate, PM-523, inhibits fusion between the virus envelope and cell membrane and inhibits the penetration of the virus into cells. This compound has shown potent anti-influenza activity and synergistic inhibitory activity in combination with ribavirin or zanamivir in vitro and in vivo. Resistant strains for zanamivir, oseltamivir or PM-523 have been isolated. The analysis of mutation points of these strains have contributed to the investigation of the antiviral mechanisms of action of these compounds and the mechanism of resistance of the mutants to these compounds.

Approaches and strategies for the treatment of influenza virus infections

Influenza A and B viruses belong to the Orthomyxoviridae family of viruses. These viruses are responsible for severe morbidity and significant excess mortality each year. Infection with influenza viruses usually leads to respiratory involvement and can result in pneumonia and secondary bacterial infections. Vaccine approaches to the prophylaxis of influenza virus infections have been problematic owing to the ability of these viruses to undergo antigenic shift by exchanging genomic segments or by undergoing antigenic drift, consisting of point mutations in the haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes as a result of an error-prone viral polymerase. Historically, antiviral approaches for the therapy of both influenza A and B viruses have been largely unsuccessful until the elucidation of the X-ray crystallographic structure of the viral NA, which has permitted structure-based drug design of inhibitors of this enzyme. In addition, recent advances in the elucidation of the structure and complex function of influenza HA have resulted in the discovery of a number of diverse compounds that target this viral protein. This review article will focus largely on newer antiviral agents including those that inhibit the influenza virus NA and HA. Other novel approaches that have entered clinical trials or been considered for their clinical utility will be mentioned.