Evaluation of new platinum-based treatment regimens in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup

Natural Compounds with Potential to Modulate Cancer Therapies and Self-Reactive Immune Cells

Cancer-related deaths are approaching 10 million each year. Survival statistics for some cancers, such as ovarian cancer, have remained unchanged for decades, with women diagnosed at stage III or IV having over 80% chance of a lethal cancer recurrence after standard first-line treatment (reductive surgery and chemotherapy). New treatments and adjunct therapies are needed. In ovarian cancer, as in other cancers, the immune response, particularly cytotoxic (CD8⁺) T cells are correlated with a decreased risk of recurrence. As well as completely new antigen targets resulting from DNA mutations (neo-antigens), these T cells recognize cancer-associated overexpressed, re-expressed or modified self-proteins. However, there is concern that activation of self-reactive responses may also promote off-target pathology. This review considers the complex interplay between cancer-reactive and self-reactive immune cells and discusses the potential uses for various leading immunomodulatory compounds, derived from plant-based sources, as a cancer therapy option or to modulate potential autoimmune pathology. Along with reviewing well-studied compounds such as curcumin (from turmeric), epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG, from green tea) and resveratrol (from grapes and certain berries), it is proposed that compounds from novel sources, for example, native Australian plants, will provide a useful source for the fine modulation of cancer immunity in patients.

Comparing PI3K/Akt Inhibitors Used in Ovarian Cancer Treatment

Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy. Herein, we sought to determine the efficacy of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt inhibition using three AZD compounds in a NOD-SCID xenograft mouse model and Akt regulation in a panel of eight ovarian cancer cell lines. Elevated Akt phosphorylation on Ser473 but not on Thr308 in cancerous tissues correlated with short progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and death. AZD8835 and AZD8186 inhibited Akt phosphorylation while AZD5363 augmented its phosphorylation on Ser473. To add, all compounds inhibited the Akt downstream effectors 4E-BP1 and p70S6 kinase. AZD8835 and AZD5363 sensitized chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin and paclitaxel treatment. Only AZD5363 could inhibit COL11A1 mRNA and promoter activity, which are important factors in Akt regulation and chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. By using a mouse xenograft model, AZD8835 and AZD5363, but not AZD8186, caused a significant reduction in tumor formation. AZD compounds did not change the mRNA expression of BRCA1/BRCA in ovarian cancer cells, but AZD8835 inhibited BRCA1/BRCA2 mRNA expression and p-ERK protein expression in OVCAR-8 cells with the KRAS mutation. This study highlights the importance of PI3K/Akt in ovarian tumor progression and chemoresistance and the potential application of AZD compounds, especially AZD8835 and AZD5363, as therapeutic agents for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Prognostic Role of Zinc Finger Homeobox 4 in Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma

Introduction: The zinc finger homeobox 4 (ZFHX4) protein is a crucial molecular regulator of tumor-initiating stem cell-like functions. Objective: This study aimed to determine the role of ZFHX4 in the progression of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (OSC). Methods: Differential gene expression ZFHX4 among low-stage (stages I and II), high-stage (stages III and IV), low-grade (grades I and II), and high-grade (grades III and IV) OSC patients was identified using four independent cohorts from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). We compared ZFHX4 expression as a prognostic factor using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, multivariate analysis, the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) of Uno's C-index, and the AUC of the receiver operating characteristics at 4 years post diagnosis. Results: ZFHX4 gene expression in high-stage tumors is significantly higher than in low-stage tumors (TCGA, p = 0.007; GSE9891, p = 0.001). A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that elevated expression of ZFHX4 was associated with a poor prognosis in OSC patients for all cohorts, regardless of stage and grade (TCGA, p = 1e-04; GSE9891, p = 0.0044; GSE13876, p = 0.00078; GSE26712, p = 0.039). Analysis of C-indices and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve further supported this result (C-index: TCGA, 0.599; GSE9891, 0.642; GSE13876, 0.585; GSE26712, 0.597). Moreover, univariate and multivariate Cox hazards analyses confirmed the prognostic significance of ZFHX4 levels. Conclusion: Collectively, these findings suggest that ZFHX4 is a prognostic factor for OSC.

Decision analysis for secondline maintenance treatment of platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a review

Most women with ovarian cancer experience disease relapse, presenting numerous treatment challenges for clinicians. Maintenance therapy in the relapsed setting aims to extend the time taken for a cancer to progress, thus delaying the need for additional treatments. Four therapies are currently approved in the USA for secondline maintenance treatment of platinum sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer: one antivascular endothelial growth factor agent (bevacizumab) and three poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib). In addition to efficacy, maintenance therapies must have a good tolerability profile and no significant detrimental impact on quality of life, as patients who receive maintenance are generally free from cancer related symptoms. Data from key bevacizumab trials (OCEANS, NCT00434642; GOG-0213, NCT00565851; MITO16B, NCT01802749) and PARP inhibitor trials (Study 19, NCT00753545; SOLO2, NCT01874353; NOVA, NCT01847274; ARIEL3, NCT01968213) indicate that bevacizumab and the PARP inhibitors are effective in patients with platinum sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer but differ in their tolerability profiles. In addition, the efficacy of PARP inhibitors is dependent on the presence of homologous recombination repair deficiency, with patients with the deficiency experiencing greater responses from treatment compared with those who are homologous recombination repair proficient. Allowing for caveats of cross trial comparisons, we advise that clinicians account for the following points when choosing whether and when to administer a secondline maintenance treatment for a specific patient: presence of a homologous recombination repair deficient tumor; the patient's baseline characteristics, such as platelet count and blood pressure; mode of administration of therapy; and consideration of future treatment options for thirdline and later therapy.

Ovarian cancer-associated mesothelial cells induce acquired platinum-resistance in peritoneal metastasis via the FN1/Akt signaling pathway

Peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer (OvCa) arises from the surface of the peritoneum, covered by monolayer of mesothelial cells (MCs). Given that both OvCa cells and MCs are present in the same peritoneal metastatic microenvironment, they may establish cell-to-cell crosstalk or phenotypic alterations including the acquisition of platinum-resistance in OvCa cells. Herein, we report how OvCa-associated mesothelial cells (OCAMs) induce platinum-resistance in OvCa cells through direct cell-to-cell crosstalk. We evaluated mutual associations between OvCa cells and human primary MCs with in vitro coculturing experimental models and in silico omics data analysis. The role of OCAMs was also investigated using clinical samples and in vivo mice models. Results of in vitro experiments show that mesenchymal transition is induced in OCAMs primarily by TGF-β1 stimulation. Furthermore, OCAMs influence the behavior of OvCa cells as a component of the tumor microenvironment of peritoneal metastasis. Mechanistically, OCAMs can induce decreased platinum-sensitivity in OvCa cells via induction of the FN1/Akt signaling pathway via cell-to-cell interactions. Histological analysis of OvCa peritoneal metastasis also illustrated FN1 expression in stromal cells that are supposed to originate from MCs. Further, we also confirmed the activation of Akt signaling in OvCa cells in contact with TGF-β1 stimulated peritoneum, using an in vivo mice model. Our results suggest that the tumor microenvironment, enhanced by direct cell-to-cell crosstalk between OvCa cells and OCAMs, induces acquisition of platinum-resistance in OvCa cells, which may serve as a novel therapeutic target for prevention of OvCa peritoneal dissemination.

Front-line chemo-immunotherapy with carboplatin-paclitaxel using oregovomab indirect immunization in advanced ovarian cancer: A randomized phase II study

BACKGROUND

This randomized phase II study tested the hypothesis that schedule dependent chemo-immunotherapy with oregovomab improves progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in optimally resected, Stage III/IV ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Patients from both academic centers and private practice in the US and Italy with Stage III/IV optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer were randomized to standard six cycle IV carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy (CP) versus CP plus four immunizations with oregovomab (CPO). A translational assessment of a cellular immune response was the primary endpoint; PFS and OS were measured as secondary endpoints.

FINDINGS

97 patients at thirteen centers were accrued to the protocol, 47 to CPO and 50 to CP. Technical issues led to inconsistent performance of the primary CA125 ELISPOT leading to unevaluable results. At a median follow up of 42 months, PFS and OS outcomes revealed an unexpectedly large treatment effect for CPO relative to CP alone, with median PFS of 41.8 months (95% C.I.: 21.8 - N.E.) for CPO and 12.2 months (10.4-18.6) for CP (p = 0.0027, HR 0.46, CI 0.28-0.7). For OS, the median for CPO has not yet been reached (NE) (45.2-NE) and for CP was 43.2 months (31.8-NE) (p = 0.043, HR 0.35, CI 0.16-0.74). The oregovomab treatment resulted in no change in toxicity profile from CP.

INTERPRETATION

The previously identified potential clinical benefit of IV CP when administered with oregovomab was further refined in this randomized phase II study. Increases of PFS and OS of statistically and clinically significant magnitude were evident in this study of a front line chemo-immunotherapy treatment of ovarian cancer.

Assessment of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point of Overall Survival in First-Line Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) recommended that progression-free survival (PFS) can serve as a primary end point instead of overall survival (OS) in advanced ovarian cancer. Evidence is lacking for the validity of PFS as a surrogate marker of OS in the modern era of different treatment types.

Objective

To evaluate whether PFS is a surrogate end point for OS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Data Sources

In September 2016, a comprehensive search of publications in MEDLINE was conducted for randomized clinical trials of systematic treatment in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. The GCIG groups were also queried for potentially completed but unpublished trials.

Study Selection

Studies with a minimum sample size of 60 patients published since 2001 with PFS and OS rates available were eligible. Investigational treatments considered included initial, maintenance, and intensification therapy consisting of agents delivered at a higher dose and/or frequency compared with that in the control arm.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Using the meta-analytic approach on randomized clinical trials published from January 1, 2001, through September 25, 2016, correlations between PFS and OS at the individual level were estimated using the Kendall τ model; between-treatment effects on PFS and OS at the trial level were estimated using the Plackett copula bivariate (R2) model. Criteria for PFS surrogacy required R2 ≥ 0.80 at the trial level. Analysis was performed from January 7 through March 20, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival and PFS based on measurement of cancer antigen 125 levels confirmed by radiological examination results or by combined GCIG criteria.

Results

In this meta-analysis of 17 unique randomized trials of standard (n = 7), intensification (n = 5), and maintenance (n = 5) chemotherapies or targeted treatments with data from 11 029 unique patients (median age, 58 years [range, 18-88 years]), a high correlation was found between PFS and OS at the individual level (τ = 0.724; 95% CI, 0.717-0.732), but a low correlation was found at the trial level (R2 = 0.24; 95% CI, 0-0.59). Subgroup analyses led to similar results. In the external validation, 14 of the 16 hazard ratios for OS in the published reports fell within the 95% prediction interval from PFS.

Conclusions and Relevance

This large meta-analysis of individual patient data did not establish PFS as a surrogate end point for OS in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, but the analysis was limited by the narrow range of treatment effects observed or by poststudy treatment. These results suggest that if PFS is chosen as a primary end point, OS must be measured as a secondary end point.

Activation of STAT3 and STAT5 Signaling in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Progression: Mechanism and Therapeutic Opportunity

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal of all gynecologic malignancies. Despite advances in surgical and chemotherapeutic options, most patients with advanced EOC have a relapse within three years of diagnosis. Unfortunately, recurrent disease is generally not curable. Recent advances in maintenance therapy with anti-angiogenic agents or Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors provided a substantial benefit concerning progression-free survival among certain women with advanced EOC. However, effective treatment options remain limited in most recurrent cases. Therefore, validated novel molecular therapeutic targets remain urgently needed in the management of EOC. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) and STAT5 are aberrantly activated through tyrosine phosphorylation in a wide variety of cancer types, including EOC. Extrinsic tumor microenvironmental factors in EOC, such as inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, hormones, and oxidative stress, can activate STAT3 and STAT5 through different mechanisms. Persistently activated STAT3 and, to some extent, STAT5 increase EOC tumor cell proliferation, survival, self-renewal, angiogenesis, metastasis, and chemoresistance while suppressing anti-tumor immunity. By doing so, the STAT3 and STAT5 activation in EOC controls properties of both tumor cells and their microenvironment, driving multiple distinct functions during EOC progression. Clinically, increasing evidence indicates that the activation of the STAT3/STAT5 pathway has significant correlation with reduced survival of recurrent EOC, suggesting the importance of STAT3/STAT5 as potential therapeutic targets for cancer therapy. This review summarizes the distinct role of STAT3 and STAT5 activities in the progression of EOC and discusses the emerging therapies specifically targeting STAT3 and STAT5 signaling in this disease setting.

A radical approach to achieve complete cytoreductive surgery improve survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Cytoreductive surgery of locally advanced ovarian cancer has evolved in the last few years from surgery to remove macroscopic residual disease (<1cm; R2b) to macroscopic complete cytoreductive surgery with no gross residual disease (R1). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the adoption of a maximalist surgical approach on postoperative complications, disease recurrence and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study using prospectively collected data on patients who received either conservative approach (CA) or radical approach (RA) surgical treatment for primary ovarian cancer stage IIIc/IVa/IVb between June 2006 and June 2013.

RESULTS

Data for 114 patients were included, 33 patients in the CA group and 68 patients in the RA group were consequently analysed. In the RA group, operative time was longer, in relation to more complex surgical procedures; with more blood losses and a higher rate of compete macroscopic resection. Totally, 77% of the patients had postoperative complications, with more grade I/II complications in the RA group but the same rates of grade III/IV complications in the both groups (P=0.14). For all patient study population, the overall and disease-free survivals were improved in case of no macroscopic residual disease. Overall survival was improved in the RA group (P=0.05), with no difference in terms of disease-free survival (P=0.29) CONCLUSION: A radical approach in advanced ovarian cancer allows a higher rate of complete cytoreductive surgery impacting overall survival. However, a non-significant trend for increased mild complications (grade I/II) rate is observed in this group.

Circular RNA Cdr1as Upregulates SCAI to Suppress Cisplatin Resistance in Ovarian Cancer via miR-1270 Suppression

The aim of this study is to explore the roles of circular RNA (circRNA) Cdr1as on cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer and explore the underlying mechanisms. We investigated the expression of circRNAs in five paired cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant tissues of ovarian cancer by microarray analysis. The quantitative real-time PCR analysis was to investigate the expression pattern of Cdr1as in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer patient tissues and cell lines. Then, the effects of Cdr1as on cisplatin resistance, cell proliferation, and apoptosis were assessed in ovarian cancer cells. In this study, Cdr1as was observed to be downregulated in cisplatin-resistant patient tissues and cell lines. Overexpression of Cdr1as inhibited cell proliferation and promoted the cisplatin-induced cell apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. Then we demonstrated that repressed Cdr1as promoted the miR-1270 expression, and miR-1270 could bind to the predicted binding site of Cdr1as. Furthermore, we found that miR-1270 displayed its role via modulating the Suppressor of Cancer Cell Invasion (SCAI) expression. Importantly, we demonstrated that Cdr1as was downregulated in serum exosomes from cisplatin-resistant patients. In summary, our study demonstrated that Cdr1as sensitizes ovarian cancer to cisplatin by regulating the miR-1270/SCAI signaling pathway.

Effects of Gastrointestinal-Type Chemotherapy in Women With Ovarian Mucinous Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To estimate whether gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with improved survival compared with standard gynecologic regimens for women with ovarian mucinous carcinoma.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy at two academic centers. Demographic and clinical information was abstracted from the medical records. Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy contained 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, or oxaliplatin. Gynecologic regimens included standard carboplatin or cisplatin. Bevacizumab treatment was allowed in both groups. Summary statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics; Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator was used to compare survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients received either gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy (n=26; 50%) or a standard gynecologic regimen (n=26; 50%). Three-quarters of tumors were early-stage (I or II), 68% grade 1 or 2 and 88% of patients had no gross residual disease after surgery. Patients receiving gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy were more likely to receive bevacizumab (50% vs 4%; P<.001), but there were no other differences in clinical or demographic characteristics. Unadjusted overall survival analyses showed that gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.8), as were early stage tumors and having no gross residual disease.

CONCLUSION

Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab was associated with improved survival and should be considered in patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma requiring adjuvant therapy.

Readministration of Platinum Agents in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients Who Developed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Carboplatin

BACKGROUND/AIM

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to carboplatin, a key drug for ovarian cancer patients, are problematic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of readministration of platinum agents (PTs) in recurrent ovarian cancer patients who developed HSRs to carboplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who developed HSRs to carboplatin were divided into those who continued to receive PTs in the following cycle (continuation group, n=24) and those in whom either the drug was switched to non-platinum agents (non-PTs) or chemotherapy was ended (discontinuation group, n=7). Outcomes were evaluated based on patients' medical records.

RESULTS

The median survival time following HSRs was 28.1 and 15.4 months in the continuation and discontinuation groups, respectively (p=0.018). In the continuation group, a total of 155 cycles of PTs were re-administrated, and 50 cycles (32%) led to recurrent HSRs. There were no recurrent HSRs with a severity of grade 3 or greater.

CONCLUSION

Continuation of PTs in ovarian cancer patients may contribute to improvement in their overall survival without severe recurrent HSRs.

Treatment Tolerance and Side Effects of Intraperitoneal Carboplatin and Dose-Dense Intravenous Paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency of clinically significant side effects associated with adjuvant intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin and intravenous (IV) dose-dense paclitaxel chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Patients with stage II to IV EOC who underwent upfront cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant IP carboplatin (AUC 6) every 3 weeks with IV paclitaxel weekly at 80 mg/m² were included. Side effects and the resulting changes in treatment are presented using univariate analysis and compared to major phase III RCTs.

RESULTS

Between March 2013 and October 2015, 49 patients comprising 289 cycles of chemotherapy were included in the analysis; 43 patients (87.8%) completed six cycles of chemotherapy and 38 (77.6%) completed six cycles of IP carboplatin. Treatment was discontinued early due to neuropathy (5/49) and disease progression (1/49). Carboplatin IV was substituted due to port access (3/49) and poor postoperative performance status (3/49). Neutropenia occurred in 16 patients (32.7%). Fourteen patients (28.6%) required red blood cell transfusion. Thrombocytopenia affected nine patients (18.4%). Infection delaying treatment occurred in five patients (10.4%). Gastrointestinal and renal toxicity occurred in four (8.1%) and one patient (2.0%), respectively. Four patients experienced a taxane reaction. No patients experienced ototoxicity, fistula formation, chemotherapy leakage, or severe abdominal pain.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin IP and weekly IV paclitaxel was well-tolerated with a side-effect profile similar to or better than previously published traditional treatment regimens.

Potential survival benefits from optimized chemotherapy implementation in advanced ovarian cancer: Projections from a microsimulation model

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed in advanced stages, when survival is poor. Treatment advances have been made, but are inconsistently implemented. Our purpose was to project the maximum life expectancy gains that could be achieved in women with stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer if the implementation of available chemotherapy regimens could be optimized.

METHODS

We used a microsimulation model to estimate life expectancy benefits associated with "optimized" implementation of four post-operative chemotherapy options: standard intravenous chemotherapy; intraperitoneal + intravenous chemotherapy; bevacizumab + intravenous chemotherapy; and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy + intravenous chemotherapy. Optimized implementation was defined as follows. Patients triaged to primary cytoreductive surgery received intraperitoneal + intravenous chemotherapy if optimally or completely cytoreduced, and bevacizumab + intravenous chemotherapy if suboptimally cytoreduced. Patients triaged to neoadjuvant chemotherapy received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at interval cytoreductive surgery if optimally or completely cytoreduced, and standard IV chemotherapy if suboptimally cytoreduced. Life expectancy associated with optimized implementation was compared with that of current utilization practices, estimated using published literature and the National Cancer Database. Effects of model uncertainty were evaluated in sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Life expectancy associated with optimized implementation vs. current practice was 76.7 vs. 64.5 months (life expectancy gain = 12.2 months). Providing intraperitoneal + intravenous chemotherapy to all eligible patients was the largest driver of life expectancy gains, due to both the potential benefit conferred by intraperitoneal + intravenous chemotherapy and the proportion of eligible women who do not receive intraperitoneal + intravenous chemotherapy in current practice.

CONCLUSION

Population-level life expectancy in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer could be substantially improved through greater uptake of available chemotherapy regimens.

Multicenter, randomised, open-label, non-comparative phase 2 trial on the efficacy and safety of the combination of bevacizumab and trabectedin with or without carboplatin in women with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

Background

Trabectedin, in addition to its antiproliferative effect, can modify the tumour microenvironment and this could be synergistic with bevacizumab. The efficacy and safety of trabectedin and bevacizumab ± carboplatin have never been investigated.

Methods

In this phase 2 study, women progressing between 6 and 12 months since their last platinum-based therapy were randomised to Arm BT: bevacizumab, trabectedin every 21 days, or Arm BT+C: bevacizumab, trabectedin and carboplatin every 28 days, from cycles 1 to 6, then trabectedin and bevacizumab as in Arm BT. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival rate (PFS-6) and severe toxicity rate (ST-6) at 6 months, assuming a PFS-6 ≤35% for BT and ≤40% for BT+C as not of therapeutic interest and, for both arms, a ST-6  ≥ 30% as unacceptable.

Results

BT+C (21 patients) did not meet the safety criteria for the second stage (ST-6 45%; 95%CI: 23%–69%) but PFS-6 was 85% (95%CI: 62%–97%). BT (50 patients) had 75% PFS-6 (95%CI: 60%–87%) and 16% ST-6 (95%CI 7%–30%).

Conclusions

BT compared favourably with other platinum- and non-platinum-based regimens. The combination with carboplatin needs to be assessed further in a re-modulated safer schedule to confirm its apparent strong activity.

Clinical Trial Registration

NCT01735071 (Clinicaltrials.gov).

Olaparib in the treatment of ovarian cancer

The poly ADP ribose polymerase olaparib is currently approved in front line BRCA-associated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), platinum-sensitive recurrence agnostic to BRCA status and for gBRCA as treatment in the fourth line and beyond. Women who are diagnosed with advanced stage EOC face a formidable challenge in overcoming their disease and achieving long-term, disease-free survival. The qualifier here is disease free. EOC is largely exquisitely chemosensitive, especially in the treatment naive (first line) setting and the expectation is that the vast majority of women will complete front line platinum-based chemotherapy with a response. When unselected (not selected by BRCA) women are enrolled on clinical trials, the response rate among those who have measurable disease at the time of chemotherapy initiation is 48% for carboplatin/paclitaxel and 67% for carboplatin/paclitaxel plus bevacizumab. When one considers the addition of women who start chemotherapy without measurable disease, they will likely also end chemotherapy without measurable disease and the overall rate of no evidence of disease at conclusion of chemotherapy approaches 80%. Despite this, the majority of women will suffer relapse of their disease, typically within the first 3 years following completion of therapy. Once recurrent, the disease is highly treatable for many years but no longer considered curable. This review will cover indications for olaparib in ovarian cancer as well as ongoing combination trials and rationale for these combinations.

Immunotherapy: Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lynch-Associated Gynecologic Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

Research into novel therapies for gynecologic cancers is underfunded, and as a result, we are still playing catchup with other solid tumors in the realm of immune checkpoint inhibition. This is despite the fact that two of the most common gynecologic cancers in the USA have strong biologic rationales for response to these agents. Work is now underway to demonstrate safe and effective therapies for our patients. As we better understand the immune system, and more specifically the tumor microenvironment, we will be able to achieve complete responses. The immune system can learn, adapt, and provide ongoing surveillance; if only we could mimic its abilities.

Hopes and failures in front-line ovarian cancer therapy

Through the last three decades, the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin remains the standard of care chemotherapy in newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Based on a single trial, first-line maintenance therapy with angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab was approved in Europe and widely applied. In 2018, based on a second trial bevacizumab was approved for first-line maintenance in the United States. Despite complete remission upon chemotherapy, the majority of the patients recur. A large number of randomized trials were conducted to explore the optimal front-line therapy regimen, but neither dose-densing, nor adding of a third chemotherapy agent or intraperitoneal administration could improve overall survival (OS). Also implementation of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or the neoadjuvant approach failed to improve OS. Recently, maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors showed encouraging results in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation. Further trials with targeted therapies are ongoing. Here we review the achievements of front-line therapy in primary advanced EOC through the last three decades and discuss future treatment strategies.

HIF Inactivation of p53 in Ovarian Cancer Can Be Reversed by Topotecan, Restoring Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Sensitivity

Ovarian cancer growth under hypoxic conditions results in hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1α) stabilization. HIF1α is an adverse prognostic factor that may contribute to worse outcomes via its capacity to bind to p53, potentially blocking p53-mediated apoptosis. We determined whether HIF1α-p53 binding occurred in hypoxic ovarian cancer cell lines, and if this blocked p53 transcriptional activity. Topotecan (TPT), used in the treatment of ovarian cancer, inhibits HIF1α translation via a topoisomerase-1 (TOPO1)-dependent mechanism. We examined if TPT knockdown of HIF1α restored p53 transcriptional function. TPT effects on HIF1α and p53-related transcriptional targets were assessed by PCR. Associations between TPT effects and TOPO1 expression levels were examined by Western blots and knockdown by siRNA. RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation was used to assess if TOPO1 was resident on HIF1α mRNA. We determined if sublethal doses of TPT, used to knockdown HIF1α, reversed hypoxia-related cisplatin and paclitaxel resistance (XTT assay). Flow cytometry was used to assess HIF1α-mediated upregulation of ABCB1 and ABCB5 efflux pump expression. We found that HIF1α binding to, and inhibition of, p53 transcriptional activity in hypoxic ovarian cancer cells was associated with drug resistance. TPT-mediated downregulation of HIF1α in hypoxic cells required TOPO1 resident on HIF1α mRNA, restored p53 transcriptional activity, downregulated ABCB1/ABCB5 cell surface expression, and reversed hypoxia-related cisplatin and paclitaxel resistance. IMPLICATIONS: TPT-mediated reduction of HIF1α accumulation in hypoxic ovarian cancer cell lines restores p53 tumor-suppressor function, offering a novel approach to reverse chemoresistance. Further clinical investigation is warranted.

Clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer patients receiving three versus more cycles of chemotherapy after neoadjuvant treatment and interval cytoreductive surgery

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical outcomes for stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery followed by up to three versus more cycles of post-operative chemotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a multi-institution retrospective cohort study of patients treated from January 2005 to February 2016 with neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy followed by interval surgery and post-operative chemotherapy. The following were exclusion criteria: more than four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bevacizumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, non-platinum therapy, prior chemotherapy, and elevated CA125 values after three post-operative chemotherapy cycles. Progression-free and overall survival and toxicity profiles were compared between groups receiving up to three cycles versus more that three cycles post-operatively.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients met inclusion criteria: 41 received up to three cycles and 59 received more than three cycles. The groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, performance status, tumor histology, optimal cytoreduction rates, and median number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles. Median progression-free survival was 14 vs 16.6 months in those receiving up to three cycles versus more than three cycles, respectively (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.68, p=0.97). Similarly, median overall survival was not different at 47.1 vs 69.4 months, respectively (HR 1.96, 95% CI 0.87 to 4.42, p=0.10). There were no differences in grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-related toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Extending post-operative chemotherapy beyond three cycles in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery with normalization of CA125 levels was not associated with improved survival or greater toxicity. Future study in a larger cohort is warranted to define optimal length of cytotoxic treatment.

Chemotherapy Resistance in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common gynaecologic malignancy seen in women. Majority of the patients with ovarian cancer are diagnosed at the advanced stage making prognosis poor. The standard management of advanced ovarian cancer includes tumour debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy. Various types of chemotherapeutic regimens have been used to treat advanced ovarian cancer, but the most promising and the currently used standard first-line treatment is carboplatin and paclitaxel. Despite improved clinical response and survival to this combination of chemotherapy, numerous patients either undergo relapse or succumb to the disease as a result of chemotherapy resistance. To understand this phenomenon at a cellular level, various macromolecules such as DNA, messenger RNA and proteins have been developed as biomarkers for chemotherapy response. This review comprehensively summarizes the problem that pertains to chemotherapy resistance in advanced ovarian cancer and provides a good overview of the various biomarkers that have been developed in this field.

miR-211 facilitates platinum chemosensitivity by blocking the DNA damage response (DDR) in ovarian cancer

The DNA damage response (DDR) is one of the most important mechanisms of platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. Some miRNAs have been identified to be involved in the regulatory network of DDR, thus the abnormal expression of miRNAs might affect platinum chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer. In this study, by assessing miRNAs simultaneously targeting a set of DDR genes that exhibited response to platinum, we found that miR-211 inhibited most of those genes, and proposed that miR-211 might affect the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to platinum by targeting multiple DDR genes and thereby determine the prognosis of ovarian cancer. To verify the hypothesis, we analyzed the association between miR-211 level and clinical prognosis, assessed the effect of miR-211 on DDR and platinum chemosensitivity, and explored the possible molecular mechanism. We revealed that miR-211 enhanced platinum chemosensitivity and was positively correlated with favorable outcomes in ovarian cancer patients. Many DDR genes including TDP1 were identified as targets of miR-211. In contrast, TDP1 suppressed DNA damage and platinum chemosensitivity. Moreover, the miR-211 level in tissues was shown to be associated with the good outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and negatively correlated with the expression of TDP1. Conclusively, we demonstrated that miR-211 improves the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients by enhancing the chemosensitivity of cancer cells to platinum via inhibiting DDR gene expression, which provides an essential basis to identify novel treatment targets to block DDR effectively and improve chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer.

Weekly versus 3-weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer: which is the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen?

The 3-weekly regimen of carboplatin and paclitaxel is the backbone of first line adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. The landmark Japanese Gynaecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) 3016 study demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival with dose dense weekly administration of paclitaxel in combination with 3-weekly carboplatin. However, efforts to replicate these benefits have failed in subsequent phase III trials. Weekly paclitaxel is purported to have enhanced antitumor activity, with stronger anti-angiogenic effects, and yet is better tolerated. In this review, we explore the rationale for dose dense weekly paclitaxel, and compare the relevant trials as well as quality of life considerations. Possible reasons for the difference in outcomes between the JGOG 3016 and other studies are reviewed, with a focus on how the addition of bevacizumab, the variations between histological and molecular subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancers, and ethnic pharmacogenetic differences may potentially affect the efficacy of dose dense paclitaxel.

Differences in presentation and survival of Asians compared to Caucasians with ovarian cancer: An NRG Oncology/GOG Ancillary study of 7914 patients

PURPOSE

To compare patient/tumor characteristics and outcomes of Asians to Caucasian patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Ancillary data were pooled and analyzed from ten prospective randomized front-line Gynecologic Oncology Group clinical trials from 1996 to 2011. Demographic, clinicopathologic features, disease-specific and all-cause survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 7914 patients, 7641 were Caucasian and 273 Asian. When compared to Caucasians, Asians were younger at trial enrollment, had a better performance status, earlier-stage cancers (17.2% vs. 8.1% with stage I; p < 0.001), and were more likely to be of clear cell (15.8% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001) and mucinous (3.3% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001) histology. Asians had an improved 5-year disease-specific survival of 54.1% compared to 46.1% for Caucasians, p = 0.001. In multivariate analysis, the Asian race remained a significant prognostic factor for all-cause survival (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99; p = 0.04). Other factors predictive of improved survival included younger age, better performance status, optimal cytoreduction, earlier stage, non-clear cell histology, and lower grade tumors.

CONCLUSION

Asians enrolled into phase III ovarian cancer clinical trials were younger, with better performance status, earlier-stage of disease, and have a greater number of clear cell and mucinous tumors. After adjusting for these prognostic factors, Asians have a better survival compared to Caucasians.

Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Do More Options Mean Greater Benefits?

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors’ suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

A healthy 51-year-old woman presented with increasing abdominal and pelvic pain. Computed tomography imaging of the abdomen and pelvis showed an 11.6-cm pelvic mass, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, right hydronephrosis, and mesenteric tumor deposits ( Fig 1A ). A serum CA-125 was elevated at 1,149 U/mL. She underwent primary surgical cytoreduction including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, appendectomy, resection of pelvic tumor, omentectomy, and low anterior resection with colorectal anastomosis. Intraoperatively, she was noted to have bilateral ovarian masses, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenopathy, and a 4-cm omental tumor; in addition, both the uterus and rectosigmoid colon had adherent tumor deposits. All gross tumor was resected during the procedure. Final pathology confirmed high-grade serous carcinoma of ovarian origin ( Fig 1B ) that was determined to be stage IIIC as a result of upper abdominal involvement with greater than 2-cm tumor deposits, as well as retroperitoneal lymph node involvement. She underwent germline genetic testing, which did not identify a mutation in the BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, or RAD51D genes. She presented for adjuvant chemotherapy after an optimal (R0) resection.

Efficacy and safety of TC dose-dense chemotherapy as first-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: a single-institution retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal first-line therapy of advanced ovarian cancer still remains questionable: standard paclitaxel-carboplatin (TC), dose-dense TC, intraperitoneal chemotherapy or TC plus bevacizumab. In this study, we present the real-life results of dose-dense treatment of the single-institution on Caucasian population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was used on consecutive samples of 74 patients treated with the conventional 3-weekly TC protocol (2008-11) and on 70 treated with TC dose-dense protocol (2012-16). The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression free-survival (PFS) and toxicity. We made adjustments for age, pathohistological type, tumor grade, stage and postoperative residual disease by Cox regression.

RESULTS

After adjustment for pre-planned clinical and sociodemographic factors, patients treated with dose-dense protocol showed a significantly lower hazard for dying from any cause, than patients treated with conventional protocol (HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.26-0.98; P = 0.042). Median OS, at 60 months follow-up had not been reached in the dose-dense group, while in the standard treatment group was 48 months (95% CI 33-62). Unadjusted PFS was significantly longer in the dose-dense group (HR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.38-0.88; P = 0.011), but not after the adjustment (P = 0.096). Generally, the level of toxicity was similar in both groups of patients. The need for blood transfusions and usage of filgrastim was significantly higher in the TC dd group. The incidence of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia Grade 3 or 4 were not significantly different in both regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective study has shown the superior efficacy and comparable toxicity of dose-dense chemotherapy regimen over the conventional regimen in treatment of ovarian cancer on Caucasian population at a single-institution.

A Role for NF-κB in Organ Specific Cancer and Cancer Stem Cells

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) account for tumor initiation, invasiveness, metastasis, and recurrence in a broad range of human cancers. Although being a key player in cancer development and progression by stimulating proliferation and metastasis and preventing apoptosis, the role of the transcription factor NF-κB in cancer stem cells is still underestimated. In the present review, we will evaluate the role of NF-κB in CSCs of glioblastoma multiforme, ovarian cancer, multiple myeloma, lung cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, as well as cancer of the bone. Next to summarizing current knowledge regarding the presence and contribution of CSCs to the respective types of cancer, we will emphasize NF-κB-mediated signaling pathways directly involved in maintaining characteristics of cancer stem cells associated to tumor progression. Here, we will also focus on the status of NF-κB-activity predominantly in CSC populations and the tumor mass. Genetic alterations leading to NF-κB activity in glioblastoma, ependymoma, and multiple myeloma will be discussed.

Trebananib or placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer (TRINOVA-3/ENGOT-ov2/GOG-3001): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Angiopoietin 1 and 2 regulate angiogenesis and vascular remodelling by interacting with the tyrosine kinase receptor Tie2, and inhibition of angiogenesis has shown promise in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We aimed to assess whether trebananib, a peptibody that inhibits binding of angiopoietin 1 and 2 to Tie2, improved progression-free survival when added to carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian, primary fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in a phase 3 clinical trial.

METHODS

TRINOVA-3, a multicentre, multinational, phase 3, double-blind study, was done at 206 investigational sites (hospitals and cancer centres) in 14 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with biopsy-confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III to IV epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using a permuted block method (block size of six patients) to receive six cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) and carboplatin (area under the serum concentration-time curve 5 or 6) every 3 weeks, plus weekly intravenous trebananib 15 mg/kg or placebo. Maintenance therapy with trebananib or placebo continued for up to 18 additional months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, as assessed by the investigators, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01493505, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 30, 2012, and Feb 25, 2014, 1164 patients were screened and 1015 eligible patients were randomly allocated to treatment (678 to trebananib and 337 to placebo). After a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 17·7-34·2), 626 patients had progression-free survival events (405 [60%] of 678 in the trebananib group and 221 [66%] of 337 in the placebo group). Median progression-free survival did not differ between the trebananib group (15·9 months [15·0-17·6]) and the placebo group (15·0 months [12·6-16·1]) groups (hazard ratio 0·93 [95% CI 0·79-1·09]; p=0·36). 512 (76%) of 675 patients in the trebananib group and 237 (71%) of 336 in the placebo group had grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events; of which the most common events were neutropenia (trebananib 238 [35%] vs placebo 126 [38%]) anaemia (76 [11%] vs 40 [12%]), and leucopenia (81 [12%] vs 35 [10%]). 269 (40%) patients in the trebananib group and 104 (31%) in the placebo group had serious adverse events. Two fatal adverse events in the trebananib group were considered related to trebananib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (lung infection and neutropenic colitis); two were considered to be related to paclitaxel and carboplatin (general physical health deterioration and platelet count decreased). No treatment-related fatal adverse events occurred in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

Trebananib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel did not improve progression-free survival as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. The combination of trebananib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel did not produce new safety signals. These results show that trebananib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel is minimally effective in this patient population.

FUNDING

Amgen.

Inhibitory effect of carbonyl reductase 1 against peritoneal progression of ovarian cancer: evaluation by ex vivo 3D-human peritoneal model

The current authors previously reported that a carbonyl reductase 1 (CR1) DNA-dendrimer complex could potentially be used in gene therapy for peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer. The aims of the current study were to observe the cellular dynamics of peritoneal metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer cells and to ascertain changes in the dynamics of ovarian cancer cells as a result of transfection of CR1 DNA. (1) Artificial human peritoneal tissue (AHPT) was seeded with serous ovarian cancer cells, and the process leading to development of peritoneal carcinomatosis was observed over time. (2) Peritoneal carcinomatosis was produced in mice and compared to a model using AHPT to determine the appropriateness of AHPT. (3) CR1 DNA was transfected into cancer cells seeded on AHPT, and the dynamics of cancer cells were observed over time. (1) Cancer cells perforated the mesothelium, leaving normal mesothelium intact. However, the cells proliferated between the layers of the mesothelium, forming a mass. After 24 h, cancer cells had invaded the lymphatics, and after 48-72 h cancer cells had invaded deep into the mesothelium, where they formed a mass. (2) Invasion of the peritoneum by cancer cells in a murine model of peritoneal carcinomatosis resembled that in a model using AHPT, and results substantiated the reproducibility of peritoneal carcinomatosis in AHPT. (3) Proliferation of cells transfected with CR1 DNA was significantly inhibited on AHPT, and necrosis was evident. Nevertheless, cancer cell invasion deep into the mesothelium was not inhibited. Use of a new tool, AHPT, in an in vitro model of peritoneal metastasis revealed that CR1 DNA inhibited cancer cell proliferation. CR1 DNA does not play a role in inhibiting invasion of the mesothelium during peritoneal metastasis, but it does affect cancer cell proliferation. Results suggested that CR1 DNA inhibits cancer cell proliferation via necrosis.

Akt inhibitor SC66 promotes cell sensitivity to cisplatin in chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells through inhibition of COL11A1 expression

We studied Akt inhibition using SC66 in a NOD-SCID xenograft mouse model and a panel of eight ovarian cancer cell lines. Elevated phospho-Akt levels in cancerous tissue were associated with short progression-free survival and overall survival. Cell sensitivity to SC66 was inversely correlated with phospho-Akt and COL11A1 expression levels, as well as resistance to cisplatin or paclitaxel. SC66 inhibited phosphorylation of Akt and its downstream effectors 4EBP1 and p70S6 kinase. SC66 also attenuated expression of TWIST1 and Mcl-1, factors important in cell invasiveness and anti-apoptosis, respectively. SC66-sensitized chemoresistant cells to cisplatin and paclitaxel treatment, and promoted apoptosis. In addition, SC66 inhibited COL11A1 expression via decreased binding of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (c/EBPβ), reducing chemoresistance and decreasing binding of nuclear transcription factor Y (NF-YA) to COL11A1. A mouse xenograft experiment demonstrated that SC66 treatment caused a reduction in tumor formation and enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin. This study demonstrates the role of Akt in ovarian tumor progression and chemoresistance, and supports the application of SC66 as a therapy for ovarian cancer.

MYC status as a determinant of synergistic response to Olaparib and Palbociclib in ovarian cancer

Background

While PARP inhibitors and CDK4/6 inhibitors, the two classes of FDA-approved agents, have shown promising clinical benefits, there is an urgent need to develop new therapeutic strategies to improve clinical response. Meanwhile, extending the utility of these inhibitors beyond their respective molecularly defined cancer types is challenging and will likely require biomarkers predictive of treatment response especially when used in a combination drug development setting.

Methods

The effects of PARP inhibitor Olaparib and CDK4/6 inhibitor Palbociclib on ovarian cancer cells lines including those of high-grade serous histology were examined in vitro and in vivo. We investigated the molecular mechanism underlying the synergistic effects of drug combination.

Findings

We show for the first time that combining PARP and CDK4/6 inhibition has synergistic effects against MYC overexpressing ovarian cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, we find that Palbociclib induces homologous recombination (HR) deficiency through downregulation of MYC-regulated HR pathway genes, causing synthetic lethality with Olaparib. We further demonstrate that MYC expression determines sensitivity to combinatorial treatment with Olaparib and Palbociclib.

Interpretation

Our data provide a rationale for clinical evaluation of therapeutic synergy of these two classes of inhibitors in ovarian cancer patients whose tumors show high MYC expression and who do not respond to PARP inhibitors or CDK4/6 inhibitors monotherapies.

Fund

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672575, 81874111, 81472447 to HC; 81572586 and 81372853 to PL], and the Liaoning Provincial Key Basic Research Program for Universities [LZ2017002 to HC].

Practice patterns of surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: analysis from international surveys

Background

We investigated the practice patterns of surgery for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) through relevant international surveys.

Methods

After searching for 878 studies on surgery for AOC till 2017, we extracted 18 questions with similar query and answer formats from eight studies. Among them, 5 and 13 were classified as comprehensive and procedure information.

Results

In comprehensive information, there was a higher preference for optimal cytoreduction defined as no visible tumor (44%) compared with residual tumors <1 cm (38%) or <2 cm (2%) and omental disease involving the spleen or pancreas was more important as an intraoperative finding precluding optimal cytoreduction (35%) since 2010. The preference for neoadjuvant chemotherapy was the highest at its use for 1-10% (36%), which was preferred in Europe over USA. The positive expectation of preoperative determination of optimal cytoreduction was higher in Europe than in USA (44 vs. 27%; P < 0.05). In procedure information, conventional gynecological surgery was mainly performed by gynecological oncologists, whereas more than 50% of upper abdominal or urological surgeries were conducted by other surgeons. European clinicians showed a higher response rate of diaphragmatic stripping and resection than those from USA (88 vs. 60%; 69 vs. 24%; P < 0.05).

Conclusion

No visible tumor as the criterion for optimal cytoreduction was preferred in AOC, and aggressive surgery beyond conventional gynecological surgery tended to be performed by other surgeons. Moreover, the preference of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the positive expectation of preoperative determination of optimal cytoreduction were higher in Europe than in USA.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer classically presents with vague persistent gastrointestinal, urologic, or nonacute abdominal/pelvic symptoms (bloating, early satiety, discomfort). Ultimately, a pelvic examination or imaging identifies an adnexal mass typically with accompanied advanced peritoneal dissemination. Management involves aggressive cytoreductive surgery in combination with platinum and taxane chemotherapy. Over the last 20 years, optimal resection and mode and timing of chemotherapy have evolved. The authors review the initial diagnosis and management and present the available data and recommendations to guide the decision tree of when to use neoadjuvant, intraperitoneal, HIPEC, dose-dense, and maintenance chemotherapy in the front-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Phase III trials in ovarian cancer: The evolving landscape of front line therapy

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer has a high mortality to case ratio. To improve the initial response to therapy, trials of biologic agents in combination with primary chemotherapy and as maintenance after completing chemotherapy are being conducted. Multiple trials are ongoing and this strategy has great promise. However, the changing landscape of primary treatment will make designing future trials in ovarian cancer difficult as there may not be a consensus on the optimal primary therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed clinicaltrials.gov for recent and ongoing phase III clinical trials that are likely to impact primary therapy in ovarian cancer. We summarized the objectives and the available data from these trials.

RESULTS

A total of 12 potentially practice-changing, randomized phase III trials in front line ovarian cancer were identified in which a biologic therapy was added to primary chemotherapy and/or was used in the maintenance setting. These trials included PARP inhibitors (PARPi), anti-angiogenic agents, immuno-oncology agents, and combinations of these agents. Of the 12 trials, 10 are ongoing, one was terminated for futility, and one has been recently reported. All of these trials emphasize the use of maintenance targeted therapy. In addition, 7 randomized phase III trials utilizing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were identified in the setting of upfront ovarian cancer treatment.

DISCUSSION

There are multiple ongoing trials in primary ovarian cancer. These trials investigate PARPi, anti-angiogenic agents, immuno-oncology agents, combinations of these agents, and HIPEC. Many of these trials will mature within the next several years and are likely to change the primary treatment of women with ovarian cancer.

Nomogram for Predicting Individual Survival After Recurrence of Advanced-Stage, High-Grade Ovarian Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To analyze clinical prognostic factors for survival after recurrence of high-grade, advanced-stage ovarian-peritoneal-tubal carcinoma and to develop a nomogram to predict individual survival after recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients treated in multicenter Gynecologic Oncology Group protocols for stage III and IV ovarian-peritoneal-tubal carcinoma who underwent primary debulking surgery, received chemotherapy with paclitaxel and a platinum compound, and subsequently developed recurrence. Prognostic factors affecting survival were identified and used to develop a nomogram, which was both internally and externally validated.

RESULTS

There were 4,739 patients included in this analysis, of whom, 84% had stage III and 16% had stage IV ovarian carcinoma. At a median follow-up of 88.8 months (95% CI 86.2-92.0 months), the vast majority of patients (89.4%) had died. The median survival after recurrence was 21.4 months (95% CI 20.5-21.9 months). Time to recurrence after initial chemotherapy, clear cell or mucinous histology, performance status, stage IV disease, and age were significant variables used to develop a nomogram for survival after recurrence, which had a concordance index of 0.67. The time to recurrence alone accounted for 85% of the prognostic information. Similar results were found for patients who underwent second look laparotomy and had a complete pathologic response or received intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

For individuals with advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma who recur after standard first-line therapy, estimated survivals after recurrence are closely related to the time to recurrence after chemotherapy and prognostic variables can be used to predict subsequent survival.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinialTrials.gov, NCT00002568, NCT00837993, NCT00002717, NCT01074398, and NCT00011986.

ZNF671 DNA methylation as a molecular predictor for the early recurrence of serous ovarian cancer

Serous ovarian cancer is the most frequent type of epithelial ovarian cancer. Despite the use of surgery and platinum‐based chemotherapy, many patients suffer from recurrence within 6 months, termed platinum resistance. Currently, the lack of relevant molecular biomarkers for the prediction of the early recurrence of serous ovarian cancers is linked to the poor prognosis. To identify an effective biomarker for early recurrence, we analyzed the genome‐wide DNA methylation status characteristic of early recurrence after treatment. The patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset who showed a complete response after the first therapy were categorized into 2 groups: early recurrence serous ovarian cancer (ERS, recurrence ≤12 months, n = 51) and late recurrence serous ovarian cancer (LRS, recurrence >12 months, n = 158). Among the 12 differently methylated probes identified between the 2 groups, we found that ZNF671 was the most significantly methylated gene in the early recurrence group. A validation cohort of 78 serous ovarian cancers showed that patients with ZNF671 DNA methylation had a worse prognosis (P < .05). The multivariate analysis revealed that the methylation status of ZNF671 was an independent factor for predicting the recurrence of serous ovarian cancer patients both in the TCGA dataset and our cohort (P = .049 and P = .021, respectively). Functional analysis revealed that the depletion of ZNF671 expression conferred a more migratory and invasive phenotype to the ovarian cancer cells. Our data indicate that ZNF671 functions as a tumor suppressor in ovarian cancer and that the DNA methylation status of ZNF671 might be an effective biomarker for the recurrence of serous ovarian cancer after platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Current strategies for the targeted treatment of high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer and relevance of BRCA mutational status

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. In most women, it is diagnosed at an advanced stage, which largely explains the poor prognosis of this malignancy. Germline mutations of the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, which encode proteins essential for the repair of double-strand DNA breaks through homologous recombination, lead to increased cancer predisposition. BRCA mutations are present in approximately 14% of epithelial ovarian cancers. Somatic BRCA mutations have also been described. Current first-line treatment of high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer includes debulking surgery followed by combination chemotherapy, usually carboplatin and paclitaxel. Ovarian cancer is highly sensitive to chemotherapy, in particular to platinum drugs. Most patient will achieve remission with initial chemotherapy, but most will eventually experience disease recurrence. Targeted therapies, including the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab and oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, have been recently approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer, based on the results from randomized clinical trials showing significant benefits in terms of progression-free survival, with acceptable tolerability and no detrimental effects on quality of life. Olaparib, the first PARP inhibitor to be granted approval, is currently indicated as maintenance monotherapy in ovarian cancer patients with relapsed disease and mutated BRCA who have achieved a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The analysis of BRCA mutational status has, therefore, also become crucial for therapeutic decisions. Such advances are making personalized treatment of ovarian cancer feasible. Here we briefly review treatments for platinum-sensitive, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer that are currently available in Italy, with a focus on targeted therapies and the relevance of BRCA mutational analysis. Based on the evidence and on current guidelines, we propose strategies for the tailored treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer that take into account BRCA mutational status and the treatment received in the first-line setting.

Assessing the impact of efficacy stopping rules on the error rates under the multi-arm multi-stage framework

BACKGROUND

The multi-arm multi-stage framework uses intermediate outcomes to assess lack-of-benefit of research arms at interim stages in randomised trials with time-to-event outcomes. However, the design lacks formal methods to evaluate early evidence of overwhelming efficacy on the definitive outcome measure. We explore the operating characteristics of this extension to the multi-arm multi-stage design and how to control the pairwise and familywise type I error rate. Using real examples and the updated nstage program, we demonstrate how such a design can be developed in practice.

METHODS

We used the Dunnett approach for assessing treatment arms when conducting comprehensive simulation studies to evaluate the familywise error rate, with and without interim efficacy looks on the definitive outcome measure, at the same time as the planned lack-of-benefit interim analyses on the intermediate outcome measure. We studied the effect of the timing of interim analyses, allocation ratio, lack-of-benefit boundaries, efficacy rule, number of stages and research arms on the operating characteristics of the design when efficacy stopping boundaries are incorporated. Methods for controlling the familywise error rate with efficacy looks were also addressed.

RESULTS

Incorporating Haybittle-Peto stopping boundaries on the definitive outcome at the interim analyses will not inflate the familywise error rate in a multi-arm design with two stages. However, this rule is conservative; in general, more liberal stopping boundaries can be used with minimal impact on the familywise error rate. Efficacy bounds in trials with three or more stages using an intermediate outcome may inflate the familywise error rate, but we show how to maintain strong control.

CONCLUSION

The multi-arm multi-stage design allows stopping for both lack-of-benefit on the intermediate outcome and efficacy on the definitive outcome at the interim stages. We provide guidelines on how to control the familywise error rate when efficacy boundaries are implemented in practice.

A randomized phase II study of cabozantinib versus weekly paclitaxel in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study

INTRODUCTION

Cabozantinib is a receptor tyrosine kinases inhibitor that targets MET (c-MET), VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), RET, AXL, KIT, FLT-3, and TIE-2 and previously showed promising single agent activity in recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This was an open label, 1:1 randomized study of cabozantinib 60 mg orally (PO) daily versus weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m² given 3 out of 4 weeks (NCT01716715); 111 patients were enrolled. Eligibility included persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma and at least one but no >3 prior chemotherapy regimens.

RESULTS

Median PFS was similar for both treatment groups and was 5.3 months for cabozantinib and 5.5 months for weekly paclitaxel (HR 1.11 (90% CI 0.77-1.61, p = 0.64)). Secondary analyses of overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) showed that cabozantinib did not perform as well as weekly paclitaxel. Median OS for cabozantinib was 19.4 months and was not reached for weekly paclitaxel (HR 2.27 (90% CI 1.17-4.41, p = 0.04). EFS was also worse in the cabozantinib arm, 3.5 months, compared to weekly paclitaxel at 5.0 months (HR 1.81 (90% CI 1.24-2.63, p = 0.01). Overall response rate (ORR) was less for cabozantinib compared to weekly paclitaxel (7% versus 24.1%). Gastrointestinal toxicities, specifically nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal pain were worse in the cabozantinib arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Median PFS was similar for cabozantinib and weekly paclitaxel. However, OS, EFS, and ORR were worse for cabozantinib compared to weekly paclitaxel. Cabozantinib given at this dose and schedule cannot be recommended as a treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum

The Gynecologic Oncology Committee of FIGO in 2014 revised the staging of ovarian cancer, incorporating ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer into the same system. Most of these malignancies are high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC). Stage IC is now divided into three categories: IC1 (surgical spill); IC2 (capsule ruptured before surgery or tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface); and IC3 (malignant cells in the ascites or peritoneal washings). The updated staging includes a revision of Stage IIIC based on spread to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes alone without intraperitoneal dissemination. This category is now subdivided into IIIA1(i) (metastasis ≤10 mm in greatest dimension), and IIIA1(ii) (metastasis >10 mm in greatest dimension). Stage IIIA2 is now "microscopic extrapelvic peritoneal involvement with or without positive retroperitoneal lymph node" metastasis. This review summarizes the genetics, surgical management, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies for epithelial cancers, and the treatment of ovarian germ cell and stromal malignancies.

Novel treatment options in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: A review

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of death due to gynecologic malignancy. The majority of advanced stage EOC patients, even those who respond well to frontline therapy, will ultimately recur and succumb to their disease. In platinum-sensitive EOC patients, or those who recur ≥6 months from initial diagnosis, treatment of recurrent disease has traditionally consisted of repeat platinum-based chemotherapy. Secondary cytoreduction remains controversial. Due to recent advances in molecularly targeted treatment options, outcomes for advanced stage EOC patients are significantly improving and hold great promise. This review discusses pivotal trials establishing platinum-based combination chemotherapy as the standard of care and addresses the utility of increasing a patient's platinum-free interval. It then discusses the role of anti-angiogenesis therapeutics, specifically bevacizumab, cediranib, and trebananib and their side effects. Lastly, it reviews key trials for the three poly-adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose polymerases (PARP) inhibitors that have been FDA-approved for maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC: olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib. This review concludes with a discussion regarding ongoing and future clinical trials.

Monepantel considerably enhances the therapeutic potentials of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in ovarian cancer: in vitro and in vivo studies

Ovarian cancer is a lethal disease since treated patients often die from relapse. Resistance to current treatment regime involving doxorubicin and gemcitabine is well known. Hence, we set forth to develop a more effective therapy by combining current treatment drugs with monepantel, an antihelminth drug with proven anticancer effect. In vitro cytotoxicity were first investigated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), gemcitabine, monepantel as single agents and then in combination with monepantel on ovarian tumor cells. Drug effect on oncogenic proteins was determined by western blot analysis and resistance to drugs by colony formation assays. Using in vivo model (nude mice), a similar study, as above, was carried out to determine correlation to in vitro findings. Close correlation existed between in vitro and in vivo studies with the latter indicating that combination of monepantel with either low or high dose PLD was more effective compared to single drug therapy. A similar finding existed for gemcitabine, with gemcitabine showing a more superior efficacy (100% ablation) in combination with MPL. Western blot analysis indicated p-mTOR, p70s6K and 4E-BP1 were severely inhibited by combination of MPL with either PLD or gemcitabine. Colony formation assay indicated a dramatic reduction of colonies with combination treatment suggesting a considerable reduction of resistance. After 28 days, treatment using a combination of MPL with either PLD or gemcitabine showed tumor regression. Hence, the combination of gemcitabine or doxorubicin with monepantel may serve as a more effective therapy for ovarian cancer.

Anetumab ravtansine inhibits tumor growth and shows additive effect in combination with targeted agents and chemotherapy in mesothelin-expressing human ovarian cancer models

Despite the recent advances in the treatment of ovarian cancer, it remains an area of high unmet medical need. Epithelial ovarian cancer is associated with high levels of mesothelin expression, and therefore, mesothelin is an attractive candidate target for the treatment of this disease. Herein, we investigated the antitumor efficacy of the mesothelin-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) anetumab ravtansine as a novel treatment option for ovarian cancer in monotherapy and in combination with the antitumor agents pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), carboplatin, copanlisib and bevacizumab. Anetumab ravtansine showed potent antitumor activity as a monotherapy in ovarian cancer models with high mesothelin expression. No activity was seen in mesothelin-negative models. The combination of anetumab ravtansine with PLD showed additive anti-proliferative activity in vitro, which translated into improved therapeutic in vivo efficacy in ovarian cancer cell line- and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models compared to either agents as a monotherapy. The combination of anetumab ravtansine with the PI3Kα/δ inhibitor copanlisib was additive in the OVCAR-3 and OVCAR-8 cell lines in vitro, showing increased apoptosis in response to the combination treatment. In vivo, the combination of anetumab ravtansine with copanlisib resulted in more potent antitumor activity than either of the treatments alone. Likewise, the combination of anetumab ravtansine with carboplatin or bevacizumab showed improved in vivo efficacy in the ST081 and OVCAR-3 models, respectively. All combinations were well-tolerated. Taken together, these data support the development of anetumab ravtansine for ovarian cancer treatment and highlight its suitability for combination therapy with PLD, carboplatin, copanlisib, or bevacizumab.