Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): outcome-based study of 276 patients with long-term (> or =5-year) follow-up

Benign and Low Grade Serous Epithelial Tumors: Recent Developments and Diagnostic Problems

This review focuses on recent advances in the area of low-grade ovarian serous neoplasia with emphasis on key diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, and disease classification based on current understanding of low-grade serous carcinogenesis. Despite considerable controversy surrounding serous tumors of low malignant potential (S-LMP) or borderline tumors, there have been great strides in our understanding of the serous group of borderline and malignant pelvic epithelial neoplasms in the past decade. Most S-LMP have a favorable prognosis, but recurrences and progression to carcinoma occur, sometimes following a protracted clinical course. Pathologic risk factors vary, but the extraovarian implant status is the most important predictor for progressive disease. Progression of S-LMP usually takes the form of low-grade serous carcinoma, although transformation to high-grade carcinoma is occasionally seen. A pelvic S-LMP - low-grade serous carcinoma pathway has been proposed based on global gene expression profiling, shared mutations in KRAS and/or BRAF, and in most cases, the presence of S-LMP in de novo low-grade serous carcinoma. Unlike high-grade serous carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma responds poorly to standard platinum-based chemotherapy. Development of more tailored therapy for S-LMP with invasive implants and low-grade serous carcinoma, ideally based on a relative risk model for disease progression, is under active clinical investigation.

Ovarian serous surface papillary borderline tumors form sea anemone-like masses

PURPOSE

To clarify the imaging characteristics of ovarian serous surface papillary borderline tumor (SSPBT), whose prognosis is far better than that of serous surface papillary adenocarcinoma (SSPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and imaging findings of six cases (age range, 26-58 years; mean, 43 years) with SSPBT encountered at our institute from 1996 to 2008.

RESULTS

Serum levels of CA125 were elevated, and they were clinically suspected to have ovarian cancer. All masses were almost entirely solid and showed hyperintense papillary architecture with hypointense internal branching on T2-weighted MRI. Five patients had peritoneal implants, and two had lymph node enlargement, and all tumors were accompanied by ascites. In all cases, contralateral ovaries had cystic masses with mural nodules or mixed solid and cystic masses, of which the solid part was similar to the contralateral mass. No evidence of recurrence was noted at a follow-up of >12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

SSPBT, which has more favorable prognosis than those of flank ovarian carcinoma, is characterized by a solid mass with papillary architecture and internal branching resembling a sea anemone on MR.

Prognosis and prognostic factors of the micropapillary pattern in patients treated for stage II and III serous borderline tumors of the ovary

BACKGROUND

To determine the prognosis of a micropapillary (MP) pattern in patients with stage II and stage III serous borderline tumor of the ovary (SBOT).

METHODS

Review of patients with stage II and stage III SBOT treated or referred to our institution with characterization of an MP pattern and its clinical impact.

RESULTS

In 1969-2006, 168 patients were reviewed. Fifty-six patients had SBOT-MP. The rate of conservative surgery was lower in the SBOT-MP group than in the typical SBOT group, but the rate of patients with more than three peritoneal sites with implants was higher in the SBOT-MP group. The rate of invasive implants was not statistically different between the two groups. Eighteen recurrences were observed (six of them in the form of invasive disease) in the SBOT-MP group. Only one death was observed. The overall survival times and recurrence-free intervals were similar in both groups. The only prognostic factor for recurrence in the SBOT-MP group was the use of conservative surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present series, an MP pattern doesn't appear to signify a poor prognosis. The only prognostic factor for recurrence in SBOT-MP was the use of conservative surgery. Further studies on the MP pattern are needed to evaluate prognosis and the results of conservative surgery.

Risk factors for recurrence of ovarian borderline tumors

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify clinicopathologic features that are associated with an increased risk of recurrence for borderline ovarian tumors (BOT).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated for BOT at our institution from 1979 to 2008. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time of diagnosis to time of recurrence/death or last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the PFS rate and the Wilcoxon-Gehan test was performed to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 266 patients were identified. The median age was 43 years (range, 15-94 years). The majority of patients (68.4%) had FIGO stage I disease and serous histology (73.7%). Only 23 (8.6%) patients developed recurrent disease. The median PFS was 19 years and the median follow-up was 4 years. Abnormal baseline CA-125 (>35 U/ml), advanced stage, age at diagnosis, and invasive implants were associated with decreased PFS. Of the 196 patients with serous BOT, those with a micropapillary pattern had a 3-year PFS of 75.9% (95%CI, 55.6-87.8) compared with 94.3% (95% CI, 88.4-97.3) for patients without micropapillary pattern (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Age at diagnosis, an elevated preoperative CA-125, invasive implants, and micropapillary histology were clinical factors associated with increased risk of recurrence in women with BOT. Including these clinicopathologic features will likely identify patients at higher risk for recurrence, for whom development of new treatment strategies would be appropriate.

Clinical management of borderline ovarian tumors

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are epithelial tumors of the ovaries characterized by cellular proliferation and nuclear atypia but without an infiltrative growth pattern. As they frequently affect younger patients the clinical management is complicated by considerations such as preserving fertility and reducing postoperative morbidity. Over the past several decades surgical therapy has shifted from a radical approach to more conservative treatment. There are various modes of surgery applied to the patients. All these developments have to be considered from an oncologic standpoint as BOTs represent a potentially malignant disease. Oncologic safety, as well as patients' desires and expectations, have to be balanced to reach the most appropriate treatment for BOTs. For this reason current literature will be discussed in this review to give a thorough overview of this topic and to develop recommendations for the surgical management of these patients. Open questions will be identified to elaborate the need for future surveys and research.

BRAF mutation is rare in advanced-stage low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas

Low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas are believed to arise via an adenoma-serous borderline tumor-serous carcinoma sequence. In this study, we found that advanced-stage, low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas both with and without adjacent serous borderline tumor shared similar regions of loss of heterozygosity. We then analyzed 91 ovarian tumor samples for mutations in TP53, BRAF, and KRAS. TP53 mutations were not detected in any serous borderline tumors (n = 30) or low-grade serous carcinomas (n = 43) but were found in 73% of high-grade serous carcinomas (n = 18). BRAF (n = 9) or KRAS (n = 5) mutation was detected in 47% of serous borderline tumors, but among the low-grade serous carcinomas (39 stage III, 2 stage II, and 2 stage I), only one (2%) had a BRAF mutation and eight (19%) had a KRAS mutation. The low frequency of BRAF mutations in advanced-stage, low-grade serous carcinomas, which contrasts with previous findings, suggests that aggressive, low-grade serous carcinomas are more likely derived from serous borderline tumors without BRAF mutation. In addition, advanced-stage, low-grade carcinoma patients with BRAF or KRAS mutation have a better apparent clinical outcome. However, further investigation is needed.

BRAF mutation is rare in advanced-stage low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas

Low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas are believed to arise via an adenoma-serous borderline tumor-serous carcinoma sequence. In this study, we found that advanced-stage, low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas both with and without adjacent serous borderline tumor shared similar regions of loss of heterozygosity. We then analyzed 91 ovarian tumor samples for mutations in TP53, BRAF, and KRAS. TP53 mutations were not detected in any serous borderline tumors (n = 30) or low-grade serous carcinomas (n = 43) but were found in 73% of high-grade serous carcinomas (n = 18). BRAF (n = 9) or KRAS (n = 5) mutation was detected in 47% of serous borderline tumors, but among the low-grade serous carcinomas (39 stage III, 2 stage II, and 2 stage I), only one (2%) had a BRAF mutation and eight (19%) had a KRAS mutation. The low frequency of BRAF mutations in advanced-stage, low-grade serous carcinomas, which contrasts with previous findings, suggests that aggressive, low-grade serous carcinomas are more likely derived from serous borderline tumors without BRAF mutation. In addition, advanced-stage, low-grade carcinoma patients with BRAF or KRAS mutation have a better apparent clinical outcome. However, further investigation is needed.

Patterns of recurrence and role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-IV serous ovarian borderline tumors

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate patterns of recurrence and prognostic factors as well as the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-IV ovarian SBT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients with advanced-stage SBT treated at our institution from 1979 to 2008. Advanced stage was defined as FIGO stage II-IV. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time of diagnosis to time of recurrence/death or last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier method was used to report the PFS rate.

RESULTS

A total of 80 stage II-IV patients were identified, of which 15 (19%) were stage II, 63 (79%) were stage III, and 2 (2.5%) were stage IV. The site of metastasis was pelvis in 15 patients (19%), omentum in 29 patients (36%), isolated lymph nodes in 2 patients (2.5%), lung in 1 patient (1%), axilla in 1 patient (1%), and multiple sites in 32 patients (40%). With a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 17 patients (21%) developed recurrent disease. Only patients with metastasis to the omentum or multiple sites developed recurrent disease. Of the 65 stage III/IV patients, 17 patients (26%) received adjuvant chemotherapy following diagnosis. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 89.9% (95% CI, 77.3-95.7) for patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 70.6% (95% CI, 43.1-86.6) for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

While advanced-stage ovarian SBT generally has a good prognosis, nearly 21% of patients develop recurrent disease with intermediate follow-up. It is unclear from these data if adjuvant chemotherapy influenced PFS.

How to follow up advanced-stage borderline tumours? Mode of diagnosis of recurrence in a large series stage II-III serous borderline tumours of the ovary

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to describe how recurrences were diagnosed in the largest series of patients treated for an advanced-stage serous borderline ovarian tumour.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1973 to 2006, 45 patients with a serous borderline tumour and peritoneal implants relapsed among 162 patients with a follow-up exceeding 1 year. Data concerning recurrences and the mode of diagnosis were reviewed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up interval was 8.2 years (range 19-286 months). The mode of diagnosis of recurrences was imaging (n = 19), clinical symptoms (n = 8), cancer antigen (CA) 125 elevation (n = 7), secondary surgery (n = 5) and unknown (n = 6). The median time to recurrence was 31 months (range 4-242 month). The type of recurrence was invasive low-grade serous carcinoma in 14 patients. Five patients died of recurrent tumour. Among the 39 patients with a known mode of diagnosis of recurrence, the most frequent diagnostic method for invasive recurrences was blood CA 125 elevation (6 of 13) and the majority of noninvasive recurrences were diagnosed by imaging (16 of 23).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that ultrasound is the most relevant follow-up procedure in this context. Nevertheless, the blood CA 125 test is of particular interest for detecting invasive recurrent disease, which is the most crucial event.

Molecular characterization of ovarian cancer by gene-expression profiling

Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecologic malignancy, and represents the fifth most common cause of cancer death in women in the United States. The age at diagnosis, extent of disease, success of primary surgery, and the histopathological features of the tumor are important prognostic markers. Epithelial ovarian carcinomas are classified into four major categories: serous, mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell. Each subtypes of ovarian carcinoma are known to have different clinical characteristics and biological behaviour and response to chemotherapy. Molecular studies have supported for the notion that the different histological types of ovarian cancer likely represent histopathologically, genetically, and biologically distinct diseases. Microarray-based profiling technologies have provided an opportunity to simultaneously examine the relationship between thousands of genes and clinical phenotypes. In this review, we will summarise the current gene-expression profiles that address the classification of ovarian cancer into molecular subtypes with different outcomes.

Phase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat in women with platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer and micropapillary (LMP) ovarian tumours

AIM

Micropapillary/borderline (LMP) ovarian tumours are rarely included in clinical trials and are intrinsically resistant to radiation and chemotherapy. Platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has a poor prognosis. The histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat demonstrated antitumour activity in pre-clinical ovarian cancer models.

METHODS

A phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity of belinostat in two patient populations: women with metastatic or recurrent platinum resistant (progression within 6 months) EOC and LMP ovarian tumours, both groups had received no more than 3 prior lines of chemotherapy. Belinostat 1000 mg/m(2)/d was administered iv days 1-5 of a 21 d cycle. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and tumour biopsies, where possible, for correlative studies were obtained prior to and following treatment.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with EOC and 14 patients with LMP tumours were enrolled on study. Belinostat was well tolerated with no grade four toxicity (179 cycles). Grade 3 toxicity consisted of thrombosis (3 patients), hypersensitivity (1) and elevated ALP (1). One patient with LMP tumour had a partial response (unconfirmed) and 10 had stable disease (SD), 3 were non-evaluable. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6--not reached). Best response in patients with EOC was SD (nine patients) and median PFS was 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.2-5.7 months). An accumulation of acetylated histones H3 and H4 was noted in PBMCs and in tumour tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Belinostat is well tolerated in both patient groups and shows some activity in patients with micropapillary (LMP) disease.

Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP): a clinicopathologic analysis of 16 cases

BACKGROUND

The current World Health Organization classification indicates that a uterine smooth muscle tumor that cannot be histologically diagnosed as unequivocally benign or malignant should be termed "smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential" (STUMP). STUMPs represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors that have been the subject of only a few published studies, some of which lack detailed clinicopathologic details and/or follow-up data. More recently, it has been suggested that immunohistochemical staining may be helpful in the diagnosis of STUMPs.

DESIGN

The clinicopathologic features of 16 cases of STUMP that exhibited usual smooth muscle differentiation, diagnosed between 1992 and 2006 from 11 hospitals, were studied and classified into 4 subgroups using terminology and criteria described by Stanford investigators. Immunohistochemical stains for p16, p53, MIB1 (ki-67), and estrogen and progesterone receptors were performed. The results were compared with those in the literature.

RESULTS

The tumors were classified as follows: 6 as "atypical leiomyoma with limited experience", 7 as "smooth muscle tumor of low malignant potential", 2 as "atypical leiomyoma, low risk of recurrence," and 1 as "mitotically active leiomyoma, limited experience." Follow-up was 21 to 192 months (mean, 80.8 and median, 51.5). Only 2 tumors recurred, at 15 and 51 months, respectively; both were atypical leiomyoma with limited experience (multifocal moderate-to-severe atypia, no tumor cell necrosis, and mitotic counts of 4 and 5 mitotic figures /10 high-power fields, respectively). Both tumors had areas that were indistinguishable from benign leiomyoma and both had diffuse immunoreactivity for p16 and p53. Six other tumors that had focal staining for these markers all had a benign outcome. Both patients with recurrence were alive at last follow-up (at 40 and 74 mo). All the other patients were alive and disease-free.

CONCLUSIONS

This and other studies suggest that uterine tumors classified as STUMPs using criteria proposed by Stanford investigators are usually clinically benign but should be considered tumors of low malignant potential because they can occasionally recur, in some cases, years after hysterectomy. After a mean follow-up of 80.8 months, only 2 of 16 tumors in this study recurred. Both of the latter tumors fulfilled the criteria for atypical leiomyoma with limited experience. Notably, the 2 recurrent tumors were the only ones that were strongly immunoreactive for p16 and p53, supporting earlier observations that these markers may be helpful in the prediction of the behavior of STUMPs. Patients diagnosed with STUMPs should receive long-term surveillance.

Borderline ovarian tumors and extended patient follow-up: an individual institution's experience

INTRODUCTION

Borderline tumors of the ovary (BOT) comprise nearly 20% of all ovarian malignancies and are associated with a favorable prognosis. However, since these lesions can present with malignant features and recur, a further evaluation of appropriate patient management and long-term follow-up is warranted.

METHODS

We report a physician group's retrospective experience treating BOT patients at a single institution. Patient demographics, disease pathology, treatment type (surgery, chemotherapy), and patient surveillance (e.g., disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, follow-up via CA-125/radiology/physical exam) data were reviewed in all cases.

RESULTS

In the present study, 78 BOT patients treated from April 2001 until February 2009 were identified and confirmed via pathologic diagnosis. The majority (87%) underwent surgery, although nearly 13% of patients also received adjuvant chemotherapy. In the study population, 12% of the patients developed progressive disease, which was primarily detected via CA-125 and physical exam/disease symptomatology. DFS for these patients was 38 months. Recurrent disease was significantly related to the administration of chemotherapy (P = 0.0024) and prolonged time since initial treatment (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Since BOT can be aggressive and eventually recur, continued (i.e., long-term) surveillance with CA-125 evaluation and physical examination should be considered for optimal patient follow-up.

Precursors of endometrial and ovarian carcinoma

This review discusses precursor lesions of endometrial and ovarian carcinoma with an emphasis on the unique molecular alterations that have led to the development of binary classification schemes for tumors of both the endometrium and ovary. While such a system is well established for endometrial carcinoma, only recently has a binary classification scheme been proposed for ovarian carcinoma. For both, the morphologic and molecular genetic-defining characteristics of their respective precursor lesions are described in detail. Furthermore, similarities and differences of the precursor lesions of specific tumors of these two genital tract organs are also addressed with a brief discussion of the clinical implications of their diagnosis.

[Ovarian low malignant potential tumor: how to preserve fertility?]

Ovarian low malignant potential tumor account for 10 to 20 percent of ovarian epithelial tumors. They differ from typical ovarian cancers in that they do not grow into the ovarian stroma. Likewise, if they spread outside the ovary, for example, into the abdominal cavity, they do not usually grow into the lining of the abdomen. These cancers tend to affect women at a younger age than the typical ovarian cancers and are less life-threatening than most ovarian cancers. Guidelines for surgical treatment of borderline ovarian tumors are similar to those for ovarian cancer and include hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. However, patients with borderline ovarian tumors tend to be younger than women with invasive ovarian cancer. For many of these patients, fertility is an important issue. Previous studies have suggested the safety of conservative surgery with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or cystectomy for patients with stage I borderline ovarian tumors. Despite infrequent data, this observation has been expanded to include women with advanced-stage disease. Recurrence is noted more often after this type of treatment, but does not seem to have a negative effect on survival. Management of conservative treatment (complete staging, cystectomy or oophorectomy, oophorectomy or adnexectomy) are still under debate since none avoids the malignant transformation risk. Thus, close follow-up is mandatory and the optimal moment for final oophorectomy remains unclear. When ovarian preservation is impossible, oocyte/ovarian cryopreservation or emergency ovarian induction before the surgical procedure to obtain embryos are promising but still under evaluated options.

PAX2 expression in low malignant potential ovarian tumors and low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas

Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential and low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas are thought to represent different stages on a tumorigenic continuum and to develop along pathways distinct from high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. We performed gene expression profiling on three normal human ovarian surface epithelia samples, and 10 low-grade and 10 high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas. Analysis of gene expression profiles of these samples has identified 80 genes upregulated and 232 genes downregulated in low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas. PAX2 was found to be one of the most upregulated genes in low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. The upregulation of PAX2 was validated by real-time quantitative RT-PCR, western blot and immunohistochemical analyses. Real-time RT-PCR showed a statistically significant difference in PAX2 mRNA expression (expressed as fold change in comparison to normal human ovarian surface epithelia) among ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (1837.38, N=8), low-grade (183.12, N=17), and high-grade (3.72, N=23) carcinoma samples (P=0.015). Western blot analysis revealed strong PAX2 expression in ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (67%, N=3) and low-grade carcinoma samples (50%, N=10) but no PAX2 protein expression in high-grade carcinomas (0%, N=10). Using immunohistochemistry, tumors of low malignant potential (59%, N=17) and low-grade carcinoma (63%, N=16) samples expressed significantly stronger nuclear staining than high-grade ovarian carcinoma samples (9.1%, N=263). Furthermore, consistent with earlier immunohistochemical findings, PAX2 expression was expressed in the epithelial cells of fallopian tubes but not in normal ovarian surface epithelial cells. Our findings further support the two-tiered hypothesis that tumors of low malignant potential and low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma are on a continuum and are distinct from high-grade ovarian carcinomas. In addition, the absence of PAX2 expression in normal ovarian epithelia but expression in fallopian tube fimbria and ciliated epithelial inclusions would suggest the potential development of tumors of low malignant potential and of low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas from secondary Müllerian structures.

Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems

Ovarian serous carcinomas have been graded using various systems. Recently, a 2-tier system in which tumors are subdivided into low grade and high grade has been proposed. This approach is simplistic, reproducible, and based on biologic evidence indicating that both tumors develop via different pathways. Low-grade serous carcinomas exhibit low-grade nuclei with infrequent mitotic figures. They evolve from adenofibromas or borderline tumors, have frequent mutations of the KRAS, BRAF, or ERBB2 genes, and lack TP53 mutations (Type I pathway). The progression to invasive carcinoma is a slow step-wise process. Low-grade tumors are indolent and have better outcome than high-grade tumors. In contrast, high-grade serous carcinomas have high-grade nuclei and numerous mitotic figures. Identification of a precursor lesion in the ovary has been elusive and therefore the origin of ovarian carcinoma has been described as de novo. More recently, studies have suggested that a proportion seem to originate from intraepithelial carcinoma in the fallopian tube. The development of these tumors is rapid (Type II pathway). Most are characterized by TP53 mutations and lack mutations of KRAS, BRAF, or ERBB2. Although both types of serous carcinomas evolve along different pathways, rare high-grade serous carcinomas seem to arise through the Type I pathway. Immunohistochemical stains for p53, p16, and Ki-67 for distinction of low-grade from high-grade tumors are of limited value but can be helpful in selected instances. This review provides an update on the pathogenesis and clinicopathologic features of these 2 types of serous carcinomas and addresses some of the diagnostic problems that are encountered in routine practice.

Outcomes after conservative treatment of advanced-stage serous borderline tumors of the ovary

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of the largest series of patients treated conservatively for a stage II or III serous borderline ovarian tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1969 to 2006, 41 patients were treated conservatively for an advanced-stage serous borderline ovarian tumor. Patient outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients had undergone a unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 18 a unilateral cystectomy and two bilateral cystectomy (unknown for one patient). Three patients had invasive implants. The median duration of follow-up was 57 months (range 4-235). The recurrence rate was high (56%), but overall survival remained excellent (100% at 5 years, 92% at 10 years). One death had occurred due to an invasive ovarian recurrence. Eighteen pregnancies (nine spontaneous) were observed in 14 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that spontaneous pregnancies can be achieved after conservative treatment of advanced-stage borderline ovarian tumors (with noninvasive implants) but the recurrence rate is high. Nevertheless, this high rate has no impact on survival. Conservative surgery can be proposed to patients with a borderline tumor of the ovary and noninvasive peritoneal implants. Should infertility persist following treatment of the borderline tumor, an in vitro fertilization procedure can be cautiously proposed.

Results after conservative treatment of serous borderline tumours of the ovary with stromal microinvasion but without micropapillary pattern

The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of women treated conservatively for a serous borderline ovarian tumour with stromal microinvasion (SBOT-SMI) but without micropapillary pattern. Ten women treated conservatively for a stage I (n= 8) or stage IIIB (n= 2) tumour were followed up. With a median follow-up duration of 62 months (range 7-117 months), five recurrences developed on the preserved ovary. All lesions were borderline recurrences (with noninvasive peritoneal implants in one). All women are currently disease free. Three women achieved a spontaneous pregnancy and three became pregnant after an in vitro fertilisation procedure. This study suggests that conservative treatment of SBOT-SMI is safe.

Prognostic factors in patients with ovarian serous low malignant potential (borderline) tumors with peritoneal implants

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine prognostic factors in a large series of patients with stage II or III serous low malignant potential ovarian tumor (LMPOT) and peritoneal implants.

METHODS

Patients with a serous LMPOT and peritoneal implants treated at or referred to our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The slides of ovarian tumors and peritoneal implants were reviewed by the same pathologist.

RESULTS

From 1969 to 2006, 168 patients were reviewed, 21 of whom had invasive implants. Tumors exhibited a micropapillary pattern in 56 patients. Adjuvant treatment had been administered to 61 patients. The median duration of follow-up was 57 months (range, 1-437). Forty-four patients had relapsed and 10 patients had died. The 5-year overall survival rate was 98%. Among patients with noninvasive and invasive implants, 8% and 10%, respectively, had relapsed at 5 years in the form of invasive disease (p = .08). In a multivariate analysis, the use of conservative treatment was the only prognostic factor.

INTERPRETATION

The prognosis of serous LMPOT with peritoneal implants remains good. The strongest prognostic factor in patients with an advanced-stage borderline tumor is the use of conservative surgery. In this series, a micropapillary pattern and implant subtype (invasive versus noninvasive) were not prognostic factors.

Clinical management of borderline tumours of the ovary: results of a multicentre survey of 323 clinics in Germany

The aim of this survey was to analyse the standard of care in diagnostic, surgery, chemotherapy and aftercare management for patients with borderline tumours of the ovary (BOTs) in Germany. A structured questionnaire comprising different dimensions was sent to all 1114 gynaecological departments. The questionnaire could be returned anonymously. The overall response rate was 29.0% (323 departments). Most departments were on secondary care (71.8%), tertiary care (23.2%) or university hospital (5.0%) level. Most clinicians performed not more than five BOT operations (89.2%) per year. Most departments (93.2%) used in addition to classical bimanual examination and vaginal ultrasound, tumour marker CA-125 detection, CT scan, MRI or PET-CT techniques. Departments in university and tertiary care hospitals performed more often a fresh frozen section (87 vs 64%). In young women, clinicians performed much seldom unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (92%) and only in 53% biopsies of the contralateral ovary. Generally, biopsies of the contralateral ovary were performed in 4-53% of the patients. Chemotherapy was mostly favoured in 'high-risk' patients with tumour residual, microinvasion or invasive implants. Thus, a high grade of insecurity in diagnostic and therapy of BOT exists in some gynaecological departments and underlines the need for more educational and study activities.

Recent Developments on the Significance and Pathogenesis of Lymph Node Involvement in Ovarian Serous Tumors of Low Malignant Potential (Borderline Tumors)

In approximately 27% of patients that were surgically staged for ovarian serous borderline tumors (ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential), regional lymph nodes, most commonly the pelvic and paraaortic groups, display morphologically similar epithelial clusters. Lymph nodes above the diaphragm may also be involved. Lymph node involvement does not adversely impact the overall survival of patients with ovarian serous borderline tumors, but there is controversy as to whether this finding is associated with a decrease in recurrence-free survival. Nodular aggregates of epithelium greater than 1 mm in maximum dimension, as compared with all other patterns of nodal involvement, have been associated with reduced recurrence-free survival. The lymph nodes may also be the site of recurrence and/or progression to carcinoma of an ovarian serous borderline tumor. Recent molecular and morphologic data suggest that although most nodal implants are indeed metastatic from their synchronous ovarian neoplasms, a small subset arise de novo from nodal endosalpingiosis. The precise mechanistic basis for how these noninvasive neoplasms achieve nodal metastases is unclear. However, because most patients with nodal metastases also have peritoneal implants, tumors that are ovary-confined and without ovarian surface involvement are rarely associated with nodal involvement, microinvasive borderline tumors frequently display lymphatic vessel involvement yet show a remarkably low frequency of nodal involvement, in conjunction with the recent finding that node-positive and node-negative tumors display no significant differences in lymphatic vessel density, suggest that the route of spread to lymph nodes in most cases is via the peritoneal and not tumoral lymphatics.

Immunohistochemical profiling of benign, low malignant potential and low grade serous epithelial ovarian tumors

Background

Serous epithelial ovarian tumors can be subdivided into benign (BOV), low malignant potential (LMP) or borderline and invasive (TOV) tumors. Although the molecular characteristics of serous BOV, LMP and low grade (LG) TOV tumors has been initiated, definitive immunohistochemical markers to distinguish between these tumor types have not been defined.

Methods

In the present study, we used a tissue array composed of 27 BOVs, 78 LMPs and 23 LG TOVs to evaluate the protein expression of a subset of selected candidates identified in our previous studies (Ape1, Set, Ran, Ccne1 and Trail) or known to be implicated in epithelial ovarian cancer disease (p21, Ccnb1, Ckd1).

Results

Statistically significant difference in protein expression was observed for Ccnb1 when BOV tumors were compared to LMP tumors (p = 0.003). When BOV were compared to LG TOV tumors, Trail was significantly expressed at a higher level in malignant tumors (p = 0.01). Expression of p21 was significantly lower in LG tumors when compared with either BOVs (p = 0.03) or LMPs (p = 0.001). We also observed that expression of p21 was higher in LMP tumors with no (p = 0.02) or non-invasive (p = 0.01) implants compared to the LMP associated with invasive implants.

Conclusion

This study represents an extensive analyse of the benign and highly differentiated ovarian disease from an immunohistochemical perspective.

A comparative analysis of lymphatic vessel density in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors) with and without lymph node involvement

Lymph node involvement is seen in approximately one quarter of women with surgically staged ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (serous borderline tumors), and this finding apparently does not adversely impact their overall survival. To help illuminate some of the pathomechanisms underlying this novel phenomenon, in which a largely noninvasive epithelial neoplasm is able to exit its primary site and be transported to lymph nodes with such a substantial frequency, we investigated whether significant differences in lymphatic vessel density exist between ovarian serous borderline tumors that show lymph node involvement and those that do not. The lymphatic vessel density of 13 conventional ovarian serous borderline tumors (i.e. tumors without stromal microinvasion, micropapillary/cribriform areas, or invasive implants) with at least 1 positive lymph node (study group) was compared with the lymphatic vessel density of an age- and disease extent-matched control group of 13 similarly selected lymph node-negative ovarian serous borderline tumors. Lymphatic vessel density was determined by counting the total number of vascular spaces immunohistochemically stained by the lymphatic endothelium marker D2-40 in 5 consecutive microscopic fields (x20 objective, field area of 1 microscopic field, 0.95 mm) in the most vessel-dense areas and calculating the average value per microscopic field. The peritumoral lymphatic vessel density was significantly higher than the intratumoral lymphatic vessel density in both groups. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the study and control groups regarding intratumoral lymphatic vessel density (8.0 vs. 7.61; P=0.77), peritumoral lymphatic vessel density (20.33 vs. 21.0; P=0.79), or combined, that is, peritumoral plus intratumoral lymphatic vessel density (27.81 vs. 28.62; P=0.83). Our findings, in conjunction with others in the medical literature, do not support a role for tumor lymphatics in nodal metastasis in this neoplasm. We discuss the possibility that nodal deposits may represent metastatic disease from secondary tumor implants.

Results after conservative treatment of serous borderline tumors of the ovary with a micropapillary pattern

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients treated conservatively for a serous borderline ovarian tumor with micropapillary patterns (SBOT-MP).

METHODS

Retrospective study collecting cases of conservative treatment of SBOT-MP. There are 15 patients treated with conservative management for a stage I (n = 8) or III (n = 7) SBOT-MP. Eight patients underwent a unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with a contralateral cystectomy, three a unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, two a cystectomy, and two a bilateral cystectomy. Four patients had stromal microinvasion associated with MP at histological examination of the ovarian tumor. Noninvasive implants were observed in eight patients and invasive implants in one. Three patients had residual disease <1 cm on the peritoneum. One patient received adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

After a median interval of 63 months (range, 18-120 months), 11 recurrences were observed: six of them exclusively on the ovary, three exclusively on the peritoneum (invasive peritoneal disease in one), and two on the ovary and peritoneum. One of the last two patients succumbed to the recurrence (under the form of invasive adenocarcinoma). The other patients were actually disease free. Five patients achieved eight spontaneous pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that spontaneous pregnancies can be achieved after conservative treatment of SBOT-MP. Nevertheless, as 2/3 of patients had bilateral ovarian involvement at the time of initial management, the recurrence rate is high. However, making definitive conclusions about the safety of conservative surgery is limited by the small sample size. So, further studies are warranted to evaluate conservative management of advanced-stage disease.

A clinicopathologic multivariate analysis affecting recurrence of borderline ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk factors associated with recurrence of borderline ovarian tumors that may be used as evidence of the efficacy of select preventive procedures.

METHODS

Various clinicopathologic factors of 234 patients with borderline ovarian tumors admitted to our hospital between January 2001 and June 2007 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the risk factors for odds ratio (OR) and statistical significance. The survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Recurrence of borderline ovarian tumors was observed in 26 cases and the median time to recurrence was 29.4 months. Of these cases, 5 occurred involving the ipsilateral ovary, 9 involved the contralateral ovary, and 12 spread to the pelvic peritoneum, including 3 patients who had progressed to invasive carcinoma. No tumor-related deaths were reported. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that conservative surgical procedures (OR=2.304; p=0.024), cyst rupture (OR=2.213; p=0.038), advanced FIGO stage (OR=4.114; p=0.000), microinvasion (OR=2.291; p=0.046), and peritoneal implants (OR=2.101; p=0.016) may be independent predictive factors of recurrence. The proportional hazards model identified surgical procedure (relative risk, RR=3.752, p=0.007), cyst rupture (RR=1.985, p=0.006), FIGO stage (RR=3.746, p=0.001), microinvasion (RR=1.153, p=0.009) and peritoneal implants (RR=2.742, p=0.010), as independently related to disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with borderline ovarian tumors have an excellent prognosis, the risk of recurrence remains. Identification of patients with high-risk factors is essential for offering more selective treatments to prevent recurrence.

Population-based cohort follow-up study of all patients operated for borderline ovarian tumor in western Sweden during an 11-year period

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) make up around 10–20% of all epithelial ovarian tumors. The aim of the present study was to investigate the outcome of a complete large population-based cohort of patients treated for BOT. All patients (n= 399) treated for BOT in the western part of Sweden (population around 1.6 million) between 1993 and 2004 were followed. The treatment consisted of primary staging surgery with addition of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for the majority of aneuploid tumors. Data relating to the surgical procedure, FIGO stage, histopathology, ploidy status, adjuvant chemotherapy, and disease state (recurrence or death) at follow-up visits were continuously entered into a cancer quality registry. Data concerning cases and deaths were also controlled against the Swedish National Cancer Registry. The median age of the BOT patients was 55 years (range 16–90). The relative 5- and 10-year survivals were 99.9% (95% CI 96.3–102.4) and 103.5% (95% CI 97.2–108.2), respectively. Aneuploidy was found in 63 (17%) patients, with significantly more aneuploid tumors found among patients of older (>60 years) age. Out of the 399 patients, 8 had recurrence of the disease. Three of the eight patients died from the disease. Five patients with recurrence are alive, three of these patients with no signs of disease after additional treatment. This complete long-term follow-up of a large population-based cohort of BOT patients shows that there is a good overall survival in this patient group.

Defining an appropriate threshold for the diagnosis of serous borderline tumor of the ovary: when is a full staging procedure unnecessary?

How much borderline change in an otherwise typical ovarian serous cystadenoma should warrant classification as a serous ovarian "borderline tumor?" We correlated estimated volume and percent borderline change with stage in 56 cases of serous ovarian neoplasms (excluding carcinomas) diagnosed as at least focal borderline change to see if we could define an appropriate threshold for the diagnosis of borderline tumor that would justify full surgical staging. Forty-three cases were completely staged, 6 had "fertility-sparing" but otherwise complete staging, and 7 cases had "limited" staging. Thirty-eight cases were stage 1a-1c, and 18 were greater than stage 1. Cases with stage 1 disease had a significantly lower mean volume of borderline change sampled of 2.0 compared with 5.6 cm in cases with greater than stage 1 disease (P = 0.0002). All high-stage cases had at least 1.0 cm or more of borderline change sampled (range, 1.0-12). Cases with stage 1 disease had a significantly lower mean estimated total percent borderline change of 34.8% compared with 77.2% in cases with greater than stage 1 disease (P < 0.0001). All high-stage cases had 20% or more total borderline change (range, 20%-100%). In addition, a grossly exophytic growth pattern component was highly predictive of high stage (P < or = 0.0001). Two cases recurred-both were advanced-stage and high-percent borderline change. There were no deaths due to disease (mean follow-up, 85 months). Our study supports a conservative 10% cutoff for classification as a "borderline tumor," and that complete surgical staging is not necessary when a serous neoplasm with an intracystic growth pattern has less than 10% or 0.5-cm borderline change.

Laparoscopy in the treatment of ovarian tumours of low malignant potential

Laparoscopy is increasingly used by gynaecologists for the investigation of adnexal masses. Uncertainty exists whether ovarian tumours of low malignant potential can effectively be treated by laparoscopy, whether staging bears a benefit for all patients, whether port-site metastases are a problem and how long patients need to be followed up after surgery. This review summarises the evidence to address these important questions.

Value of elastin staining in the assessment of peritoneal implants associated with ovarian serous borderline tumours

AIMS

To determine whether elastin stains aid in classifying peritoneal implants associated with ovarian serous borderline tumours (SBT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study group comprised 80 implants (nine invasive and 71 non-invasive) from 28 patients with ovarian SBT. Elastin stains were performed using histochemical and immunohistochemical methods to demonstrate the peritoneal elastic lamina (PEL), and evaluated with regard to assessment of the subtype of implant. The elastin stains demonstrated the PEL in most anatomical sites other than the omentum and the bladder and were considered helpful in 44/80 (55%) cases. The stains were most useful in the assessment of poorly oriented or traumatized biopsy specimens and in confirming the superficial distribution of non-invasive implants. The staining was non-contributory in most of the remaining biopsies, because the PEL was not identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Demonstration of the PEL using elastin stains can be useful in the subclassification of implants associated with ovarian SBT and is of most value in confirming the superficial distribution of non-invasive lesions. However, evaluation is limited by the absence of a defined elastic layer in a proportion of biopsy specimens, possibly reflecting their superficial location, as well as absence of a distinct PEL in sites such as the omentum.

Molecular Genetic Evidence of an Independent Origin of Serous Low Malignant Potential Implants and Lymph Node Inclusions

Patients with ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (LMP) are commonly found to have peritoneal implants. Less commonly, similar lesions are seen in lymph nodes, sometimes in association with endosalpingiosis. We compared these lesions to the coexisting ovarian LMP tumors to determine whether they are clonally related to the ovarian neoplasm. Seventeen patients with serous LMP tumors present at 2 or more sites were identified. Tissue samples were microdissected from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Samples of normal tissue, the ovarian LMP tumors, peritoneal LMP implants, and LMP inclusions within lymph nodes were obtained. Genomic DNA was extracted from the samples, and polymerase chain reaction and X-chromosome inactivation (human androgen receptor assay) analysis were performed. The pattern of X-chromosome inactivation could be determined in 15 of the 17 cases, and nonrandom X-chromosome inactivation was observed in 13 of these cases. Twelve of these cases included both ovarian and extraovarian LMP tumors. In 9 of these 12 cases, the extraovarian LMP tumor shared a similar pattern of nonrandom X-chromosome inactivation with the ovarian tumor. In these cases, the shared inactivation pattern was seen at 1 extraovarian site (3 cases), 2 extraovarian sites (4 cases), 5 extraovarian sites (1 case), and 7 of 8 extraovarian sites (1 case). In the remaining 3 cases, opposite patterns of nonrandom X-chromosome inactivation were seen. These data suggest that, in most cases, serous LMP tumor implants and lymph node inclusions share a common clonal origin with the associated ovarian tumors. However, in at least some cases, the implants and inclusions seem to arise independently from the associated ovarian serous LMP tumors.

Comparison of the clinical behavior of newly diagnosed stages II–IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary with that of serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential that recur as low-grade serous carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (STLMP) frequently coexist with low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary (LGSC) and, when they recur, frequently do so as LGSC. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with these two tumor types.

METHODS

All patients with stages II-IV LGSC (group 1) or with STLMP that recurred as LGSC (group 2) seen at our institution from 1973 to 2003 were identified, and demographic data were obtained. For group 1, progression-free and overall survival times were calculated from the date of primary diagnosis to the date of disease progression/recurrence or the date of last contact/death, respectively. For group 2, progression-free and overall survival times were calculated from the date of first relapse as a LGSC to the date of progression or the date of last contact/death, respectively. The method of Kaplan and Meier was used to estimate survival, and the log-rank test was used to compare differences between survival curves.

RESULTS

We identified 112 patients in group 1 and 41 in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in median age (42.7 vs. 45.4 years [at relapse]; P=0.37), progression-free survival time (19.5 vs. 25 months; P=0.92), or overall survival time (81.8 vs. 82.8 months; P=0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

The age at diagnosis, progression-free survival time, and overall survival time associated with newly diagnosed stages II-IV LGSC of the ovary are similar to those of STLMP that recur as LGSC, providing further evidence of an association between these two tumor types.

Laparoscopic restaging of borderline ovarian tumors

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and relevance of laparoscopic restaging surgery for women with borderline ovarian tumors.

METHODS

From March 2001 to February 2006, 42 women referred for borderline ovarian tumors after laparoscopy or laparotomy underwent a laparoscopic restaging operation. Of these women, 37 (88%) had undergone conservative surgery including unilateral cystectomy (n = 16), bilateral cystectomy (n = 1), and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (n = 20). The remaining five women (12%) had undergone radical surgery, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) (n = 4) and hysterectomy with BSO (n = 1). Intraoperative rupture occurred in 13 cases.

RESULTS

All 42 restaging operations were performed via the laparoscopic approach. There were no intraoperative complications, no laparoconversions, and no postoperative complications. Laparoscopic restaging identified two persistent borderline ovarian tumors (12%) in women who had initially undergone cystectomy. Seven women were upstaged (16.6%) because of positive cytology (n = 2), peritoneal biopsy (n = 2), or omentum (n = 3). Among the 28 women with initial Federation International of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage Ia disease, the final stage was Ia for 24 women, Ib for 2 women, IIIa for 1 woman, and IIIc for 1 woman. Among the 12 women with initial stage Ic disease, 11 kept the same stage and 1 was upstaged to IIIc. The woman with initial stage IIa disease was upstaged to IIb, and the woman with initial stage IIc disease was upstaged to IIIc. The risk of upstaging was significantly higher among women with serous borderline tumors. Upstaging occurred in women with both initial stages I and II disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic restaging operations for women with borderline ovarian tumors. Cystectomy was associated with a risk of persistent lesions. The risk of upstaging was higher for women with serous borderline ovarian tumors and women with initial FIGO stage I or II disease.

Microinvasion links ovarian serous borderline tumor and grade 1 invasive carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Ovarian serous borderline tumor (SBT) and grade 1 (low grade) serous carcinoma are closely related, but, unlike SBT which has been well studied, there have been few studies looking primarily at grade 1 serous carcinoma. The objective of this study was to better understand the relationship between serous borderline tumors and grade 1 serous carcinomas.

METHODS

We performed a clinicopathologic review of 46 women with SBT and 16 with grade 1 serous carcinoma.

RESULTS

Thirteen of forty-six (28%) SBTs had a micropapillary pattern, 12/46 (26%) had evidence of microinvasion and 19/46 (41%) had extraovarian implants, of which 1/19 (5%) was invasive. Three of forty-six (7%) of SBTs recurred, all of which were originally advanced stage. No patient with a microinvasive SBT recurred. The 16 grade 1 serous carcinomas divided into those with evidence of coexisting SBTs (5 cases) and those without (11 cases). Nine of sixteen (56%) carcinomas recurred, comprising 5/5 with SBT and 4/11 without. All patients had advanced stage at diagnosis. Microinvasion, invasive implants and recurrences all showed qualitative histologic resemblance to carcinoma. There were no micropapillary areas in any of the carcinomas, although cribriform pattern was seen in these tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced stage at diagnosis was the most important prognostic marker in patients with SBT. Although a micropapillary pattern was common, it did not adversely affect prognosis per se, but was associated with a higher stage. A micropapillary pattern was not seen adjacent to microinvasion or in association with grade 1 serous carcinoma. Microinvasion was common but, in our series, did not appear to worsen the prognosis. Grade 1 serous carcinoma was less common than SBT and had a more unfavorable prognosis. The qualitative histologic similarity between microinvasion, invasive implants, recurrences and grade 1 serous carcinoma suggests that microinvasion represents early invasion and is not just another histologic pattern of SBT. We speculate that some invasive implants and recurrences may be peritoneal grade 1 serous carcinoma.

Borderline ovarian tumors: current concepts for prognostic factors and clinical management

Since their original description in 1929, our knowledge of the natural history and molecular pathology of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) has advanced most dramatically over the last decade. It has been estimated that at the time of abdominal exploration for a serous ovarian neoplasm, a BOT will be discovered in approximately 15% of cases. These tumors commonly affect women of reproductive age, have an excellent overall prognosis and the majority are cured with surgery. Nevertheless, a subset of patients with these tumors have an adverse clinical outcome and the molecular features of the associated tumor subtype is currently being defined. These data have caused some to place this more aggressive subtype of BOT, called micropapillary serous with invasive extraovarian implants, into the pathologic continuum with frankly invasive carcinomas. This chapter will explore advances in our understanding of the natural history, clinical and pathologic features of BOTs and will conclude with a discussion of the molecular prognostic factors that might be targets for future therapy. A special emphasis will be placed on points of agreement identified during a recent workshop on BOTs sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Patterns of stromal invasion in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): a reevaluation of the concept of stromal microinvasion

Stromal-epithelial patterns of invasion in serous tumors of the ovary have been subclassified as destructive and nondestructive. By definition, well-differentiated serous tumors featuring destructive stromal invasion are classified as low-grade serous carcinomas whereas those with either no stromal invasion or stromal microinvasion are classified as serous tumors of low malignant potential (S-LMP). The histologic features of stromal microinvasion in ovarian S-LMP have been addressed in a variety of studies, but controversy persists regarding diagnostic criteria and prognostic significance, particularly in patients with high-stage disease. In addition, a subset of otherwise typical S-LMP has patterns of invasion that are not classic destructive invasion and do not meet the current diagnostic criteria for stromal microinvasion because of either qualitative features or size restrictions. To further evaluate the full histologic spectrum of stromal-epithelial patterns of invasion in otherwise typical S-LMP, we examined a series of 60 ovarian S-LMP (34 FIGO stage I; 26 FIGO stages II, III, and IV) with stromal-epithelial alterations not meeting criteria for classic destructive invasion. This group of cases included those meeting the definition of microinvasion and a subset that would be excluded based on size measurements or unusual qualitative features, but did not exhibit significant stromal reaction. Five patterns of invasion were identified: individual eosinophilic cells and cell clusters, cribriform, simple and noncomplex branching papillae, inverted macropapillae, and micropapillae. Individual, discrete aggregates of invasive epithelium ranged from 1 to 12 mm (mean, 1.4 mm) in greatest linear dimension as measured by conventional methods. The number of discrete foci ranged from 1 to greater than 10; in 7 tumors (12%), the invasive foci were diffusely scattered throughout the stroma without discrete aggregates. These stromal-epithelial alterations were associated with disease progression and/or death due to disease in 9 of 50 (18%) patients with follow-up (mean, 92.5 mo) and were covariant with other adverse prognostic features (invasive implants, nodular lymph node aggregates, high stage, and unresectable disease). Disease progression was most strongly linked to the presence of micropapillae, but the majority of patients with adverse outcome had the more common, classic stromal-epithelial patterns associated with microinvasion (ie, individual cells, cell clusters, and simple papillae). Neither size of the largest contiguous aggregate nor extent of stromal involvement correlated with outcome. Classic microinvasion disproportionately occurred in patients presenting during pregnancy (P<0.0001), and was not associated with adverse outcome in that setting, but follow-up was limited. Based on the cumulative outcome data, the presence of stromal-epithelial patterns of invasion distinct from classic destructive invasion in otherwise typical S-LMP stratifies patients at long-term risk for disease progression, but does not warrant a diagnosis of carcinoma or a change in current management schemes. Maintaining classification as a serous tumor of low malignant potential (serous borderline tumor) with stromal invasion seems appropriate even in the presence of diffuse stromal involvement or discrete aggregates measuring greater than 3 (or 5) mm. As the stromal-epithelial alteration featuring micropapillae may represent a comparatively higher-risk lesion with a clinical course analogous to that of low-grade serous carcinoma, pathologists should identify this specific stromal-epithelial pattern in the diagnostic report until sufficient data is acquired to form more definitive conclusions regarding its prognosis.

Tissue array analysis of expression microarray candidates identifies markers associated with tumor grade and outcome in serous epithelial ovarian cancer

Molecular profiling is a powerful approach to identify potential clinical markers for diagnosis and prognosis as well as providing a better understanding of the biology of epithelial ovarian cancer. On the basis of the analysis of HuFL expression data, we have previously identified genes that distinguish low malignant potential and invasive serous epithelial ovarian tumors. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry to monitor a subset of differently expressed candidates (Ahr, Paep, Madh3, Ran, Met, Mek1, Ccne1, Ccd20, Cks1 and Cas). A tissue array composed of 244 serous tumors of different grades (0-3) and stages (I-IV) was used in this analysis. All markers assayed presented differential protein expression between serous tumors of low and high grade. Significant differences in Ccne1 and Ran expression were observed in a comparison of low malignant potential and grade 1 tumor samples (p<0.01). In addition, irrespective of the grade, Ccne1, Ran, Cdc20 and Cks1 showed significant differences of expression in association with the clinical stage of disease. While high level of Ccne1 have previously been associated with poor outcomes, here we found that high level of either Ran or Cdc20 appear to be more tightly associated with a poor prognosis (p<0.001, 0.03, respectively). The application of these biomarkers in both the initial diagnosis and prognostic attributes of patients with epithelial ovarian tumors should prove to be useful in patient management.