Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review

Minimally invasive surgical techniques in adult degenerative spinal deformity: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches have the potential to reduce procedure-related morbidity when compared with traditional approaches. However, the magnitude of radiographic correction and degree of clinical improvement with MIS techniques for adult spinal deformity remain undefined.

QUESTION/PURPOSES

In this systematic review, we sought to determine whether MIS approaches to adult spinal deformity correction (1) improve pain and function; (2) reliably correct deformity and result in fusion; and (3) are safe with respect to surgical and medical complications.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed and Medline databases was performed for published articles from 1950 to August 2013. A total of 1053 papers were identified. Thirteen papers were selected based on prespecified criteria, including a total of 262 patients. Studies with limited short-term followup (mean, 12.1 months; range, 1.5-39 months) were included to capture early complications. All of the papers included in the review constituted Level IV evidence. Patient age ranged from 20 to 86 years with a mean of 65.8 years. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were variable, but all required at minimum a diagnosis of adult degenerative scoliosis.

RESULTS

Four studies demonstrated improvement in leg/back visual analog scale, three demonstrated improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index, one demonstrated improvement in treatment intensity scale, and one improvement in SF-36. Reported fusion rates ranged from 71.4% to 100% 1 year postoperatively, but only two of 13 papers relied consistently on CT scan to assess fusion, and, interestingly, only four of 10 studies reporting radiographic results on deformity correction found the procedures effective in correcting deformity. There were 115 complications reported among the 258 patients (46%), including 37 neurological complications (14%).

CONCLUSIONS

The literature on these techniques is scanty; only two of the 13 studies that met inclusion criteria were considered high quality; CT scans were not generally used to evaluate fusion, deformity correction was inconsistent, and complication rates were high. Future directions for analysis must include comparative trials, longer-term followup, and consistent use of CT scans to assess for fusion to determine the role of MIS techniques for adult spinal deformity.

Does minimally invasive transsacral fixation provide anterior column support in adult scoliosis?

BACKGROUND

Spinal fusion to the sacrum, especially in the setting of deformity and long constructs, is associated with high complication and pseudarthrosis rates. Transsacral discectomy, fusion, and fixation is a minimally invasive spine surgery technique that provides very rigid fixation. To date, this has been minimally studied in the setting of spinal deformity correction.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined (1) the fusion rate of long-segment arthrodeses, (2) heath-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes (VAS pain score, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], SF-36), and (3) the common complications and their frequency in adult patients with scoliosis undergoing transsacral fixation without supplemental pelvic fixation.

METHODS

Between April 2007 and May 2011, 92 patients had fusion of three or more segments extending to the sacrum for spinal deformity. Transsacral L5-S1 fusion without supplemental pelvic fixation was performed in 56 patients. Of these, 46 with complete data points and a minimum of 2 years of followup (mean, 48 months; range, 24-72 months; 18% of patients lost to followup) were included in this study. Nineteen of the 46 (41%) had fusions extending above the thoracolumbar junction, with one patient having fusion into the proximal thoracic spine (T3-S1). General indications for the use of transsacral fixation were situations where the fusion needed to be extended to the sacrum, such as spondylolisthesis, prior laminectomy, stenosis, oblique take-off, and disc degeneration at L5-S1. Contraindications included anatomic variations in the sacrum, vascular anomalies, prior intrapelvic surgery, and rectal fistulas or abscesses. Fusion rates were assessed by full-length radiographs and CT scanning. HRQOL data, including VAS pain score, ODI, and SF-36 scores, were assessed at all pre- and postoperative visits. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were noted.

RESULTS

Forty-one of 46 patients (89%) developed a solid fusion at L5-S1. There were significant improvements in all HRQOL parameters. Eight patients had complications related to the transsacral fusion, including five pseudarthroses and three superficial wound dehiscences. Three patients underwent revision surgery with iliac fixation. There were no bowel injuries, sacral hematomas, or sacral fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Transsacral fixation/fusion may allow for safe lumbosacral fusion without iliac fixation in the setting of long-segment constructs in carefully selected patients. This study was retrospective and suffered from some loss to followup; future prospective trials are called for to compare this technique to other, more established approaches.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is circumferential minimally invasive surgery effective in the treatment of moderate adult idiopathic scoliosis?

BACKGROUND

Outcomes for minimally invasive scoliosis correction surgery have been reported for mild adult scoliosis. Larger curves historically have been treated with open surgical procedures including facet resections or posterior column osteotomies, which have been associated with high-volume blood loss. Further, minimally invasive techniques have been largely reported in the setting of degenerative scoliosis.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We describe the effects of circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) for moderate to severe scoliosis in terms of (1) operative time and blood loss, (2) overall health and disease-specific patient-reported outcomes, (3) deformity correction and fusion rate, and (4) frequency and types of complications.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and January 2012, we performed 50 cMIS adult idiopathic scoliosis corrections in patients with a Cobb angle of greater than 30° but less than 75° who did not have prior thoracolumbar fusion surgery; this series represented all patients we treated surgically during that time meeting those indications. Our general indications for this approach during that period were increasing back pain unresponsive to nonoperative therapy with cosmetic and radiographic worsening of curves. Surgical times and estimated blood loss were recorded. Functional clinical outcomes including VAS pain score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-36 were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients' deformity correction was assessed on pre- and postoperative 36-inch (91-cm) standing films and fusion was assessed on CT scan. Minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 48 months; range, 24-77 months).

RESULTS

Mean blood loss was 613 mL for one-stage surgery and 763 mL for two-stage surgery. Mean operative time was 351 minutes for one-stage surgery and 482 minutes for two-stage surgery. At last followup, mean VAS and ODI scores decreased from 5.7 and 44 preoperatively to 2.9 and 22 (p < 0.001 and 0.03, respectively) and mean SF-36 score increased from 48 preoperatively to 74 (p = 0.026). Mean Cobb angle and sagittal vertical axis decreased from 42° and 51 mm preoperatively to 16° and 27 mm postoperatively (both p < 0.001). An 88% fusion rate was confirmed on CT scan. Perioperative complications occurred in 11 of the 50 patients (22%), with delayed complications needing further surgery in 10 more patients at last followup.

CONCLUSIONS

cMIS provides for good clinical and radiographic outcomes for moderate (30°-75°) adult idiopathic scoliosis. Patients undergoing cMIS should be carefully selected to avoid fixed, rigid deformities and a preoperative sagittal vertical axis of greater than 10 cm; surgeons should consider alternative techniques in those patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Extension of spine fusion to the sacrum following long fusions for deformity correction

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospective database.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term results after extension of previous long spine fusions to the sacrum.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Long spine fusions not involving the sacrum may be complicated by distal degeneration and require subsequent extension to the sacrum. The clinical and radiographical outcomes after such revision remain unknown.

METHODS

Patients who had extension of a long fusion (≥5 levels with a thoracic level at the cranial end) to the sacrum between 2002 and 2007 at a single institution were analyzed. Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society scores and/or radiographical parameters were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks and 1 year, 2, 3, and/or 5 years postoperatively (PO) and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 74 patients with an average age of 49 years (range, 19-76 yr) and average clinical follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 3 mo-10 yr, 82% >2 yr PO). All had degeneration distal to prior fusions and 72% (n = 53) had fixed sagittal imbalance. Sagittal alignment improved at all PO time points from baseline (mean, 78 mm), but worsened between 1 year (mean, 21 mm) and 5 years PO (mean, 44 mm, P = 0.01). Major surgical complications occurred in 30% (n = 22) and there were 17 major reoperations in 15 patients (20%). Significant improvements (P < 0.05) in Oswestry Disability Index and all Scoliosis Research Society domain scores were found at each PO time point with no deterioration from 1 to 5 years PO. Mean outcome scores at 5 years PO were similar in groups with major surgical complications versus without and with major reoperation versus without.

CONCLUSION

Extension of long fusions to the sacrum resulted in significant and sustained improvements in Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society scores and alignment during 5 years PO compared with baseline. Major surgical complications occurred in 30% and reoperations were performed in 20%, but outcome scores after treatment were similar to those without complications or reoperations.

Limitations and ceiling effects with circumferential minimally invasive correction techniques for adult scoliosis: analysis of radiological outcomes over a 7-year experience

Object

Minimally invasive correction of adult scoliosis is a surgical method increasing in popularity. Limited data exist, however, as to how effective these methodologies are in achieving coronal plane and sagittal plane correction in addition to improving spinopelvic parameters. This study serves to quantify how much correction is possible with present circumferential minimally invasive surgical (cMIS) methods.

Methods

Ninety patients were selected from a database of 187 patients who underwent cMIS scoliosis correction. All patients had a Cobb angle greater than 15°, 3 or more levels fused, and availability of preoperative and postoperative 36-inch standing radiographs. The mean duration of follow-up was 37 months. Preoperative and postoperative Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), coronal balance, lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence (PI) were measured. Scatter plots were performed comparing the pre- and postoperative radiological parameters to calculate ceiling effects for SVA correction, Cobb angle correction, and PI-LL mismatch correction.

Results

The mean preoperative SVA value was 60 mm (range 11.5–151 mm); the mean postoperative value was 31 mm (range 0–84 mm). The maximum SVA correction achieved with cMIS techniques in any of the cases was 89 mm. In terms of coronal Cobb angle, a mean correction of 61% was noted, with a mean preoperative value of 35.8° (range 15°–74.7°) and a mean postoperative value of 13.9° (range 0°–32.5°). A ceiling effect for Cobb angle correction was noted at 42°. The ability to correct the PI-LL mismatch to 10° was limited to cases in which the preoperative PI-LL mismatch was 38° or less.

Conclusions

Circumferential MIS techniques as currently used for the treatment of adult scoliosis have limitations in terms of their ability to achieve SVA correction and lumbar lordosis. When the preoperative SVA is greater than 100 mm and a substantial amount of lumbar lordosis is needed, as determined by spinopelvic parameter calculations, surgeons should consider osteotomies or other techniques that may achieve more lordosis.

Cost and value of spinal deformity surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

To assess (1) quality of life in patients with adult scoliosis who underwent nonoperative and/or surgical treatment, and (2) cost-effectiveness of different scoliosis treatment modalities.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recently, there has been an interest in examining quality of life of patients undergoing treatment for adult scoliosis, comparing the value of nonoperative versus operative management. This article reviews the current literature on treatment of adult scoliosis, in the hopes of drawing conclusions for the best approach to these patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched to identify articles. Health-related quality of life measures included Oswestry Disability Index scores, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) instrument scores, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and numerical rating scale for leg and/or back pain. Studies included were those involving patients with adult scoliosis who underwent primary surgery or nonoperative management. The studies that focused on the change in validated outcome scores from the onset of the study to final follow-up were found to be valuable. Studies on predominantly adolescent scoliosis and those that only measured postoperative outcomes scores were excluded.

RESULTS

The SRS-22, Oswestry Disability Index, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and numerical rating scale were found to be validated for measuring quality of life in patients with scoliosis. Thirteen studies were included, which evaluated changes in health-related quality of life outcomes from baseline in surgical and nonsurgical treatment of adult scoliosis. There was a trend toward improved quality of life measures in patients undergoing surgical treatment for adult scoliosis.

CONCLUSION

Adults with painful and disabling scoliosis may benefit from surgical treatment compared with nonsurgical treatment, given the proper indications. Nonsurgical treatment does not seem to be cost-effective and has not shown to have a positive impact on quality of life, although there is a possibility that patients' health may have deteriorated if they did not receive the nonsurgical treatment. Future prospective studies focusing on the cost-effectiveness of adult scoliosis treatment and improvement of quality of life are needed to confirm the assertion of the current retrospective literature that surgery provides better quality of life than nonoperative treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

The Seattle Spine Team Approach to Adult Deformity Surgery: A Systems-Based Approach to Perioperative Care and Subsequent Reduction in Perioperative Complication Rates

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case review pre- and postintervention.

OBJECTIVES

Characterize the effects of the intervention.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Complication rates in adult spinal deformity surgery are unacceptable. System approaches are necessary to increase patient safety. This group reported on the dual-attending surgeon approach, a live multidisciplinary preoperative screening conference, and the intraoperative protocol for the management of coagulopathy. The outcomes were demonstrated by complication rates before and after the institution of this protocol.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients in Group A were managed without the 3-pronged approach. A total of 124 consecutive patients in Group B had a dual-attending surgeon approach, were presented and cleared by a live multidisciplinary preoperative conference, and were managed according to the intraoperative protocol.

RESULTS

Group A had an average age of 62 years (range, 39-84 years). Group B had an average age of 64 years (range, 18-84 years). Most patients in both groups had fusions from 9 to 15 levels. Complication rates in Group B were significantly lower (16% vs. 52%) (p < .001). Group B showed significantly lower return rates to the operating room during the perioperative 90-day period (0.8% vs. 12.5%) (p < .001). Group B also had lower rates of wound infection requiring debridement (1.6% vs. 7.5%), lower rates of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (3.2% vs. 10%), and lower rates of postoperative neurological complications (0.5% vs. 2.5%) (not significant). Group B had significantly lower rates of urinary tract infection requiring antibiotics (9.7% vs. 32.5%) (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggests that a team approach consisting of a dual-attending surgeon approach in the operating room, a live preoperative screening conference, and an intraoperative protocol for managing coagulopathy will significantly reduce perioperative complication rates and enhance patient safety in patients undergoing complex spinal reconstructions for adult spinal deformity.

Complications in spinal deformity surgery in the United Kingdom: 5-year results of the annual British Scoliosis Society National Audit of Morbidity and Mortality

PURPOSE

To provide a 5-year national overview of corrective spinal deformity surgery in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

Since 2008, the British Scoliosis Society has collected predefined data on spinal deformity surgeries carried out by its members. Participating units collect and submit annual anonymised data pertaining to the number of deformity surgeries performed, age groups, aetiology (idiopathic versus non-idiopathic), mortality, deep infections and neurological deficit (complete, incomplete without resolution and incomplete with resolution). Overall aetiology proportions and complication rates were calculated, as well as funnel plots with control limits of individual complication rates by cases performed.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2012, 9,295 corrective spinal deformity procedures were performed. 4,445 (48%) were recorded as idiopathic and 2,917 (31%) as non-idiopathic. There were a total of 339 complications (3.6%). Deep infections occurred in 222 (2.82%), incomplete neurological deficit with resolution in 59 (0.65%), incomplete neurological deficit without resolution in 29 (0.32%), complete neurological deficit in 12 (0.13%) and mortality in 17 (0.19%).

CONCLUSION

The complication rates reported in this study compare well with previously published studies. These reported results will hopefully serve to provide a benchmark for units in the UK providing corrective spinal deformity surgery to allow individual units to compare their complication rates against national averages and to provide national complication figures to aid in the consenting process of patients. Use of a spinal deformity registry, such as the British Spine Registry, is required to ensure ongoing service development and optimal healthcare provision.

Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the mechanisms and the independent risk factors associated with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in patients treated surgically for adult spinal deformity with long fusions to the sacrum.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The occurrence of PJK may be related to preoperative and postoperative sagittal parameters. The mechanisms and risk factors for PJK in adults are not well defined.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent long instrumented fusion surgery (≥6 vertebrae) to the sacrum with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively studied. Risk factors included patient factors, surgical factors, and radiographical parameters such as thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence.

RESULTS

Ninety consecutive patients (mean age, 64.5 yr) met inclusion criteria. Radiographical PJK occurred in 37 of the 90 (41%) patients with a mean follow-up of 2.9 years. The most common mechanism of PJK was fracture at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in 19 (51%) patients. Twelve (13%) patients with PJK were treated surgically with proximal extension of the instrumented fusion. Preoperative TK more than 30°, preoperative proximal junctional angle more than 10°, change in LL more than 30°, and pelvic incidence more than 55° were identified as predictors associated with PJK. Achievement of ideal global sagittal realignment (sagittal vertical axis <50 mm, pelvic tilt <20°, and pelvic incidence-LL <±10°) protected against the development of PJK (19% vs. 45%). A multivariate regression analysis revealed changes in LL more than 30°, and preoperative TK more than 30° were the independent risk factors associated with PJK.

CONCLUSION

Fracture at the UIV was the most common mechanism for PJK. Change in LL more than 30° and pre-existing TK more than 30° were identified as independent risk factors. Optimal postoperative alignment of the spine protects against the development of PJK. A surgical strategy to minimize PJK may include preoperative planning for reconstructions with a goal of optimal postoperative alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Adult degenerative scoliosis treated with XLIF: clinical and radiographical results of a prospective multicenter study with 24-month follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographical results of patients undergoing extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), a minimally disruptive lateral transpsoas retroperitoneal surgical approach for the treatment of degenerative scoliosis (DS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgery for the treatment of DS has been reported to have acceptable results but is traditionally associated with high morbidity and complication rates. A minimally disruptive lateral transpsoas retroperitoneal surgical approach (XLIF) has become popular for the treatment of DS. This is the first prospective, multicenter study to quantify outcomes after XLIF in this patient population.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients with DS who underwent the XLIF procedure with or without supplemental posterior fixation at one or more intervertebral levels were enrolled in this study. Clinical and radiographical results were evaluated up to 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 68 years; 73% of patients were female. A mean of 3.0 (range, 1-6) levels were treated with XLIF per patient. Overall complication rate was low compared with traditional surgical treatment of DS. Significant improvement was seen in all clinical outcome measures at 24 months: Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scale for back pain and leg pain, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey mental and physical component summaries (P < 0.001). Eighty-five percent of patients were satisfied with their outcome and would undergo the procedure again. In patients with hypolordosis, lumbar lordosis was corrected from a mean of 27.7° to 33.6° at 24 months (P < 0.001). Overall Cobb angle was corrected from 20.9° to 15.2°, with the greatest correction observed in patients supplemented with bilateral pedicle screws.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the use of the XLIF procedure in the treatment of DS. XLIF is associated with good clinical and radiographical outcomes, with a substantially lower complication rate than has been reported with traditional surgical procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Do benefits overcome the risks related to surgery for adult scoliosis? A detailed analysis of a consecutive case series

PURPOSE

The surgical approach to adult spine deformities is complex and presents a high incidence of complications.

METHODS

We report here a prospective consecutive case series analysis of 20 patients submitted to posterior correction and instrumented fusion for adult degenerative scoliosis. Clinical outcomes were assessed by self-reported measures. Pre-operative and post-operative complications were analysed during a mean 30-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (55 %) presented pre-operative or post-operative complications. Fifteen different complications occurred, six in the early pre-operative period and nine during follow-up period: ten of these complications occurred in patients who underwent a previous surgery for spine disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical improvement at the final follow-up resulted as statistically significant only for the group of patients exposed to posterior fusion without interbody fusion. The observations reported here have to be considered for a shared decision-making in the management of adult scoliosis.

Long-term 2- to 5-year clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for adult scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

We assess MIS technique's clinical and functional outcomes during a 2- to 5-year period.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Traditional surgical approaches for adult scoliosis are associated with significant blood loss and morbidity, in a population that is often elderly with multiple medical comorbidities. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) represents a newer method of achieving similar long-term outcomes but considerably lower morbidity and complication rates.

METHODS

We reviewed 71 patients who underwent MIS correction of spinal deformity with fusion of 2 or more levels including: degenerative scoliosis (54), idiopathic scoliosis (11), and iatrogenic scoliosis (6). All underwent a combination of 3 MIS techniques: direct lateral interbody fusion (66), axial lumbar interbody fusion (34), and posterior instrumentation (67). Thirty-six patients were staged with direct lateral interbody fusion done first followed by the posterior instrumentation and fusion including axial lumbar interbody fusion done 3 days later.

RESULTS

Mean age was 64 years (20-84 yr). Mean follow-up was 39 months (24-60 mo). Patients with 1-stage same-day surgery had a mean blood loss of 412 mL and a mean surgical time of 291 minutes. Patients with 2-stage surgery had a mean blood loss of 314 mL and surgical time of 183 minutes for direct lateral interbody fusion and 357 mL and 243 minutes, respectively for posterior instrumentation and axial lumbar interbody fusion. Mean hospital stay was 7.6 days (2-26 d). The mean preoperative Cobb angle was 24.7° (8.3°-65°), which corrected to 9.5° (0.6°-28.8°). Mean preoperative Coronal balance was 25.5 mm, which corrected to 11 mm. Mean preoperative sagittal balance was 31.7 mm and corrected to 10.7 mm. The mean preoperative lumbar apical vertebral translation was 24 mm and corrected to 12 mm. Fourteen patients had adverse events requiring intervention: 4 pseudarthrosis, 4 persistent stenosis, 1 osteomyelitis, 1 adjacent segment discitis, 1 late wound infection, 1 proximal junctional kyphosis, 1 screw prominence, 1 idiopathic cerebellar hemorrhage, and 2 wound dehiscence.

CONCLUSION

A combination of 3 novel MIS techniques allows comparable correction of adult spinal deformity, with low pseudarthrosis rates, significantly improved functional outcomes, and excellent clinical and radiological improvement, but considerably lowers morbidity and complication rates at early and long-term follow-up.

Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is increasing awareness of adult degenerative or de novo scoliosis, and its surgical treatment when indicated can be challenging and resource intense. Surgical randomized controlled trials are rare, and observational studies pose limitations because of the heterogeneity of surgical practices, techniques, and patient populations. Pooled analysis of current literature may identify effective treatment strategies and guide future efforts at prospective clinical research. This study aimed to synthesize existing data on the outcomes of surgical intervention for adult degenerative scoliosis.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched using key words and were limited to the English language. Spine surgeons reviewed abstracts and evaluated whether they contained surgically treated cohorts of adults (more than 18 years of age) with degenerative scoliosis. Full-text articles were reviewed in detail and data were abstracted. All meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models and heterogeneity was estimated with I². Random-effects meta-regression models were used to investigate the association of treatment effects with baseline levels of each outcome.

RESULTS

Of 482 articles, 24 (n = 805) met inclusion criteria Available outcomes included Cobb angle correction, coronal and sagittal balance, visual analog scale for pain (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index. Despite significant heterogeneity among studies, random-effects meta-analysis showed significant improvements in Cobb angle (-11.1°; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.86° to -8.40°), coronal balance (7.674 mm; 95% CI, -10.5 to -4.9), VAS (-3.24; 95% CI, -4.5 to -1.98), and Oswestry Disability Index (-27.18%; 95% CI, -34.22 to -20.15) postoperative treatment (p < .001). Meta-regression models showed that preoperative values for Cobb angle, coronal balance, and VAS were significantly associated with surgical treatment effect (p < .05). Changes in sagittal balance did not reach statistical significance although only 6 articles were included.

CONCLUSIONS

Exhaustive literature review yielded 24 studies reporting preoperative and postoperative data regarding the surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. No randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified. Despite heterogeneity, a limited meta-analysis showed significant improvement in Cobb angle, coronal balance, and VAS after surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comparison of Dollars per Quality of Life Improvement Across Health Domains

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center analysis of consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

OBJECTIVE

Assess the value of surgical treatment for ASD across different health domains.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The cost of improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important consideration for resource allocation. There is also growing concern among policy makers regarding the incorporation of patient-specific preferences in the appropriate definition and assessment health care value.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective study of consecutive ASD patients undergoing primary surgery with principal diagnosis code 737.0-737.9 from 2005 through May 2010. Patients less than 18 years of age were excluded. The HRQOL measures were based on the Short Form-36, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire after at least 2 years after surgery. The SRS scores were translated to a 100-point scale. Costs were collected from hospital data on the total costs incurred for the episode of surgical care. Confidence intervals were calculated using nonparametric bootstrap methods.

RESULTS

Baseline and minimum 2-year HR follow-up data were available for 164 patients, with an average follow-up of 3.2 years and a range of 2 to 7.4 years. Patients were predominantly female (14; 88%) and ranged from 18 to 82 years of age at index surgery (average of 51 years of age). The cost-effectiveness (CE) ratios varied across different HRQOL outcomes, ranging from an average cost of $5,658 per 1-point improvement in SRS Self-image to an average cost of $25,918 per 1-point improvement in SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS). Results revealed statistically significant differences (p < .05) in CE ratios across different HRQOL outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically significant differences were found in CE ratios across HRQOL sub-domains. This has important implications in the assessment of patient-specific value of health care services, and illustrates that surgical treatment for ASD may be more cost-effective for some purposes (eg, pain reduction) and less cost-effective for others (eg, improved functional activity).

Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Prospectively enrolled, retrospectively analyzed matched cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the relative merits of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) when performed in long deformity constructs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Interbody fusion is frequently used at the caudal levels of long-segment spinal deformity instrumentation constructs to protect the sacral implants and enhance fusion rates. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding which technique is more efficacious.

METHODS

Forty-two patients who underwent TLIF and 42 patients who underwent ALIF were matched with respect to age, sex, comorbidities, curve magnitude, fusion length, and ALIF/TLIF level. Radiographs and clinical outcomes were compared at minimum 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Age averaged 54.0 years and instrumented vertebrae averaged 13.6. TLIFs had less operative time (481 vs. 595 min, P = 0.0007), but greater blood loss (2011 vs. 1281 mL, P = 0.0002). Overall complications (TLIF, 12/42 vs. ALIF, 15/42) and neurological complications (TLIF, 4/42 vs. ALIF, 3/42) did not differ. One pseudarthrosis occurred at an ALIF level, with none at TLIF levels. Patients who underwent ALIF began with lower SRS scores but showed more improvement (44.4 to 70.7 vs. 58.6 to 70.6, P = 0.0043). ODI scores in both groups improved similarly. Regionally, ALIFs engendered more lordosis than TLIFs at L3-S1 (gain of 6.9° vs. -2.6°, P < 0.0001) but not T12-S1 (gain of 11.5° vs. 7.9°, P = 0.29). Locally, ALIFs created more lordosis at L4-L5 (gain of 5.6° vs. -1.7°, P < 0.0001) and L5-S1 (gain of 2.5° vs. -1.4°, P = 0.022), but not at L3-L4 (gain of 5.3° vs. 4.0°, P = 0.65). Patients who underwent TLIF obtained greater correction of anteroposterior Cobb angles in lumbar (reduction of 22.4° vs. 9.9°, P < 0.0001) and lumbosacral curves (reduction of 10.3° vs. 3.4°, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Spinal deformity surgery used TLIFs rather than ALIFs resulted in shorter operative time with no difference in complication rates. ALIFs provided more segmental lordosis, whereas TLIFs afforded better correction of scoliotic curves.

Outcome instruments to assess scoliosis surgery

PURPOSE

To review and summarize the current knowledge regarding the outcome measures used to evaluate scoliosis surgery.

METHODS

Literature review.

RESULTS

Outcome instruments should be tested to ensure that they have adequate metric characteristics: content and construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness. In the evaluation of scoliosis, generic instruments to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) have been used, such as the SF-36 questionnaire and the EuroQol5D instrument. Nonetheless, it is preferable to use disease-specific instruments for this purpose, such as the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire and the quality of life profile for spinal deformities (QLPSD). More recently, these generic and disease-specific instruments have been complemented with the use of super-specific instruments; i.e., those assessing a single aspect of the condition or specific populations with the condition. The patients' perception of their trunk deformity and body image has received particular attention, and several instruments are available to evaluate these aspects, such as the Walter-Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS), the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ), and the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS). The impacts of brace use can also be measured with specific scales, including the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire (BSSQ) and the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ). The available instruments to evaluate the treatment for non-idiopathic scoliosis have not been sufficiently validated and analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of scoliosis treatment should include the patient's perspective, which can be obtained with the use of patient-reported outcome measures.

Health economic analysis of adult deformity surgery

Given the substantial growth in frequency and expense of spine deformity surgery, and the general economic landscape of the health care system, health economics research has an important role in the literature on adult spinal deformity (ASD). The purpose of this article is to provide an update on the current state of health economics studies in the ASD literature and to introduce areas in which health economics might play some additional role in future research on ASD.

The role of minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of adult spinal deformity

Many surgeons use minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches for treatment of patients with adult degenerative spinal deformity. The feasibility and efficacy of these techniques in the treatment of certain subtypes of degenerative deformities have been reported. In this article, several MIS techniques are discussed and an established 6-level treatment algorithm (MiSLAT) is presented, to help guide spinal surgeons in the use of MIS techniques for the treatment of patients with degenerative deformity. MIS treatment of MiSLAT level I to IV deformities is recommended, whereas level V and VI deformities require more traditional open approaches for adequate deformity correction.

Curve progression after decompression surgery in patients with mild degenerative scoliosis

OBJECT

The authors undertook this study to evaluate curve progression, risk factors for curve progression, and outcomes after decompression surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis with minimal to moderate curvature.

METHODS

Of 852 patients with lumbar canal stenosis treated by posterior decompression surgery, 50 patients had a lumbar curve greater than 10° at final follow-up. These patients were divided into 2 groups according to curve progression during the follow-up period: the P group (11 patients), with a curve progression of more than 5°, and the NP group (39 patients), with a curve progression of 5° or less. The authors compared preoperative parameters in these 2 groups to elucidate risk factors associated with curve progression and other surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

The average lumbar curve progression in the total group of 50 patients was 3.4° ± 3.9° (range -2.0° to 22.0°). In the P group the average curve progression was 8.5°, and in the NP group it was 2.0°. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant association between curve progression and any of the potential risk factors evaluated (including curve magnitude, decompression method, and degenerative intervertebral disc changes). Spur formation, evaluated with the Nathan classification at the concave side of the curve, tended to be greater in the P group, although the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in revision surgery rate, and none of the patients required arthrodesis due to curve progression. Clinical outcomes, evaluated with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and the Scoliosis Research Society 22-question questionnaire, were also similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical outcomes did not deteriorate in the P group. While curve progression after decompression surgery could not be predicted from the preoperative factors considered, spur formation at the concave side of the curve may be a candidate factor. The results of this study indicate that spinal fixation to halt deformity progression is not always necessary if the patient's pathological condition derives mainly from canal stenosis.

Non-neurologic complications following surgery for scoliosis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of non-neurologic complications following surgery for scoliosis and to identify factors that can increase this risk.

METHODS

The demographic data, medical and surgical histories, and prevalence of non-neurologic complications were reviewed in a retrospective cohort of 602 patients, who had undergone corrective surgery for scoliosis between January 2001 and June 2011.

RESULTS

There were 450 patients under 20 years old (U20) and 152 of patients above 20 years old (A20) enrolled in this study. Forty-nine patients in U20 (10.9%) and 18 patients in A20 (11.8%) had post-operative complications. Respiratory complications were most common in U20 (4%) and gastrointestinal complications were most common in A20 (7%). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the prevalence of complications. Logistic regression revealed that factors that correlated with an increased odds for complications were Cobb angle (P = 0.001/P = 0.013, respectively), length of operation time (P = 0.003/P = 0.006, respectively), duration of anesthesia (P < 0.001/P = 0.005, respectively) and transfusion (P = 0.003/P = 0.015, respectively) in U20 and A20. Also, comorbidities (P = 0.021) in U20, and decreased body mass index (P = 0.030), pre-operative forced vital capacity (P = 0.001), forced expired volume in 1s (P = 0.001), increased numbers of vertebrae fused (P = 0.004), blood loss (P = 0.001) in A20 were associated with increased odds for complications.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the prevalence of complication in scoliosis patients by age. The prevalence of complication was dependent on Cobb angle, length of operation time, duration of anesthesia and transfusion of PRBC. Deterioration of preoperative pulmonary function significantly increased risk of post-operative complications in adult patients.

Morbidity and mortality in adult spinal deformity surgery: Norwich Spinal Unit experience

PURPOSE

This study analyses the complications of spinal deformity surgery in adults to highlight pre-disposing factors.

METHODS

The clinical records and imaging were reviewed for 48 consecutive patients, 12 males and 36 females, with a mean age of 64 (31-86), who had surgery for spinal deformity. Mean follow-up time was 36 months (24-60). Patient data recorded were age, diagnosis and co-morbidities; deformity assessment: curve type, sagittal and coronal balance, Cobb angle. Operation details: number of instrumented levels, duration and intra-operative complications.

OUTCOME

complications, re-operations, balance and Cobb angle.

RESULTS

28 patients (58 %) had at least 1, 15 patients (27 %) had 2 and 5 patients (9.5 %) had more than 2 co-morbidities. Average time between 1st presentation and operation was 13 months (1-41). The mean number of levels fused was 10.8 (4-23). In addition to posterior pedicle screw instrumentation, 40 patients had chevron osteotomies and 8 had pedicle substraction osteotomies. Posterior interbody fusions were performed at one level in 17 of which 7 had 2 level fusion. Two patients had combined anterior and posterior approaches. Fusion to the pelvis was performed in 19 patients. There were a total of 27 major and minor complications in 19/48 (39.5 %) patients. Late complications included 5 patients who had revisions for proximal junctional kyphosis, 1 patient had revision for pseudoarthrosis and 4 patients had removal of mal-positioned screws.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with high complication rate in adult spinal deformity surgery are age, co-morbidities and severe sagittal imbalance at the time of presentation.

Early outcomes of minimally invasive anterior longitudinal ligament release for correction of sagittal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity

The object of this study was to evaluate a novel surgical technique in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis and present our early experience with the minimally invasive lateral approach for anterior longitudinal ligament release to provide lumbar lordosis and examine its impact on sagittal balance. Methods. All patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) treated with the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas interbody fusion (MIS LIF) for release of the anterior longitudinal ligament were examined. Patient demographics, clinical data, spinopelvic parameters, and outcome measures were recorded. Results. Seven patients underwent release of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALR) to improve sagittal imbalance. All cases were split into anterior and posterior stages, with mean estimated blood loss of 125 cc and 530 cc, respectively. Average hospital stay was 8.3 days, and mean follow-up time was 9.1 months. Comparing pre- and postoperative 36'' standing X-rays, the authors discovered a mean increase in global lumbar lordosis of 24 degrees, increase in segmental lumbar lordosis of 17 degrees per level of ALL released, decrease in pelvic tilt of 7 degrees, and decrease in sagittal vertical axis of 4.9 cm. At the last followup, there was a mean improvement in VAS and ODI scores of 26.2% and 18.3%. Conclusions. In the authors' early experience, release of the anterior longitudinal ligament using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach may be a feasible alternative in correcting sagittal deformity.

Asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy for rigid degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A prospectively study.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to clarify the safety and efficacy of asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in the treatment of severe adult lumbar deformities prospectively.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Vertebral wedge osteotomy provides good correction of kyphosis but has rarely been applied to degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis.

METHODS

A total of 14 patients who had undergone corrective osteotomy were enrolled. The average age at PSO was 67 years (range, 45-76 yr). The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Patient questionnaires were administered prospectively. Radiographical parameters including sagittal and coronal balance were analyzed.

RESULTS

Average operative time was 310 minutes (range, 254-375 min). Average blood loss was 1090 mL (range, 700-2900 mL).Mean preoperative lumbar lordosis improved from -3° to 42° at the final follow-up, and sagittal balance improved from 12 to 3 cm, respectively. Mean lumbar scoliosis improved from 40° to 12°, and coronal offset improved from 3 to 1 cm, respectively. There was also statistically significant improvement from preoperative to final evaluation in all clinical domains. There were 4 complications: 1 dural tear, 2 hook dislodgements at the cephalad side requiring revision instrumentation, and 1 rod breakage not requiring surgical intervention. Overall, all 14 patients were satisfied with their surgical management and would choose to repeat the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the surgical procedure of asymmetrical PSO is to correct the scoliosis, to restore the lumbar lordosis by way of convex-sided posterolateral wedge osteotomy, and may go a long way toward solving the problems of rigid lumbar degenerative kyphoscoliosis.

Does prior short-segment surgery for adult scoliosis impact perioperative complication rates and clinical outcome among patients undergoing scoliosis correction?

Object

In many adults with scoliosis, symptoms can be principally referable to focal pathology and can be addressed with short-segment procedures, such as decompression with or without fusion. A number of patients subsequently require more extensive scoliosis correction. However, there is a paucity of data on the impact of prior short-segment surgeries on the outcome of subsequent major scoliosis correction, which could be useful in preoperative counseling and surgical decision making. The authors' objective was to assess whether prior focal decompression or short-segment fusion of a limited portion of a larger spinal deformity impacts surgical parameters and clinical outcomes in patients who subsequently require more extensive scoliosis correction surgery.

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort analysis with propensity scoring, based on a prospective multicenter deformity database. Study inclusion criteria included a patient age ≥ 21 years, a primary diagnosis of untreated adult idiopathic or degenerative scoliosis with a Cobb angle ≥ 20°, and available clinical outcome measures at a minimum of 2 years after scoliosis surgery. Patients with prior short-segment surgery (< 5 levels) were propensity matched to patients with no prior surgery based on patient age, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Cobb angle, and sagittal vertical axis.

Results

Thirty matched pairs were identified. Among those patients who had undergone previous spine surgery, 30% received instrumentation, 40% underwent arthrodesis, and the mean number of operated levels was 2.4 ± 0.9 (mean ± SD). As compared with patients with no history of spine surgery, those who did have a history of prior spine surgery trended toward greater blood loss and an increased number of instrumented levels and did not differ significantly in terms of complication rates, duration of surgery, or clinical outcome based on the ODI, Scoliosis Research Society-22r, or 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Score (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Patients with adult scoliosis and a history of short-segment spine surgery who later undergo more extensive scoliosis correction do not appear to have significantly different complication rates or clinical improvements as compared with patients who have not had prior short-segment surgical procedures. These findings should serve as a basis for future prospective study.

Surgery is an Effective and Reasonable Treatment for Degenerative Scoliosis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review to evaluate the role of surgery for treating degenerative scoliosis (DS) in terms of improved function (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) and correction of deformity (Cobb angle); safety outcomes included complication and repeat surgery rates. METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge and Cochrane Library databases was performed. The methodological quality of each study was assessed according to standardized criteria and data were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies including 553 patients with DS met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. The mean ODI score at final follow-up was 36.0 ± 7.8 (304 patients) and the mean decrease in ODI was 23.3 ± 11.3 (302 patients). Mean reduction in curve angle (as a percentage of the original curve) was 48.5 ± 21.0% (527 patients). The overall incidence of complications was 49.0% (171 in 349 patients) and the rate of repeat surgery was 15.3% (61 in 398 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high incidence of complications and reoperations, surgery was an effective and reasonable treatment for DS, providing significant functional improvement and deformity correction.

Major complications in revision adult deformity surgery: risk factors and clinical outcomes with 2- to 7-year follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of major complications, identify risk factors, and assess long-term clinical benefit after revision adult spinal deformity surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No study has analyzed risk factors for major complications in long revision fusion surgery and whether or not occurrence of a major complication affects ultimate clinical outcome.

METHODS

Analysis of consecutive adult patients who underwent multilevel revision surgery for spinal deformity with a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. All complications were classified as either major or minor. Outcome analysis was conducted with the Scoliosis Research Society and Oswestry Disability Index scores.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients (mean age = 53.8 years) were identified with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range: 2-7). Primary diagnoses included idiopathic/de novo scoliosis (107), degenerative (35), trauma (7), neuromuscular scoliosis (6), congenital deformity (5), ankylosing spondylitis (2), tumor (2), Scheuermann kyphosis (1), and rheumatoid arthritis (1). Most common secondary diagnoses that necessitated revision surgery were adjacent segment disease, fixed sagittal imbalance, and pseudarthrosis. Overall, 34.3% of patients developed major complications (19.3% perioperative; 18.7% follow-up). Associated risk factors for perioperative complications were patient- (age > 60 years, medical comorbidities, obesity) and surgery-related (pedicle subtraction osteotomy). Performance of a 3-column osteotomy and postoperative radiographic changes that suggested progressive loss of sagittal correction were recognized as risk factors for follow-up complications. Equivalent outcome scores were reported by patients preoperatively, but those experiencing follow-up complications reported lower scores at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Overall, 34.4% of patients experienced major complications after long revision fusion surgery. Different risk factors were identified for perioperative versus follow-up complications. The occurrence of a follow-up, not but perioperative, major complication seemed to have a negative impact on ultimate clinical outcome.

Comparative analysis of clinical outcome and complications in primary versus revision adult scoliosis surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case comparison study.

OBJECTIVE

We compared clinical outcome and complications in adult patients who underwent primary (P) versus revision (R) scoliosis surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is a paucity of data comparing P versus R adult scoliosis patients with respect to their complication rates and clinical outcome.

METHODS

Assessment of 250 consecutive adult patients who underwent P versus R surgery for idiopathic or de novo scoliosis between 2002 and 2007, with a minimum 2-year follow-up, was performed.

RESULTS

There were 126 patients in the P group and 124 in the R group. Mean age at surgery (P = 51.2 vs. R = 51.6 years, P = 0.79), length of follow-up (P = 3.6 vs. R = 3.6 years, P = 0.94), comorbidities (P = 0.43), and smoking status (P = 0.98) were similar between the 2 groups. Body mass index (P = 25.5 vs. R = 27.4 kg/m, P = 0.01), number of final instrumented levels (P = 10.5 vs. R 12.1 levels, P = 0.00), fusion to the sacrum (P = 61.0% vs. R = 87.1%, P = 0.00), osteotomy (P = 14.3% vs. R = 54.9%, P = 0.00), length of surgery (P = 6.5 vs. R = 8.2 hours, P = 0.00), and estimated blood loss (P = 1072.1 vs. R = 1401.3 mL, P = 0.05) were different. Primary patients had significantly lower overall complications than revision patients (P = 45.2% vs. R = 58.2%, P = 0.042). Primary patients reported significantly higher preoperative and final clinical outcome measures in function, pain, and subscore SRS domains and ODI compared with revision patients (all P < 0.05). Patients older than 60 years of age, however, reported similar SRS and ODI scores between the 2 groups. The extent of surgical benefit patients received, that is, final minus preoperative score, was similar in all categories between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Adult patients undergoing primary scoliosis surgery had significantly lower overall complications compared with revision patients. Primary patients reported higher preoperative and final clinical outcome measures than revision patients, although this difference disappeared in older patients. The benefit of surgery was similar between the 2 groups.

Complications in patients undergoing combined transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation with deformity correction for degenerative scoliosis and spinal stenosis

Background:

Utilization of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) approach for scoliosis offers the patients deformity correction and interbody fusion without the additional morbidity associated with more invasive reconstructive techniques. Published reports on complications associated with these surgical procedures are limited. The purpose of this study was to quantify the intra- and postoperative complications associated with the TLIF surgical approach in patients undergoing surgery for spinal stenosis and degenerative scoliosis correction.

Methods:

This study included patients undergoing TLIF for degenerative scoliosis with neurogenic claudication and painful lumbar degenerative disc disease. The TLIF technique was performed along with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. The average follow-up time was 30 months (range, 15–47).

Results:

A total of 29 patients with an average age of 65.9 years (range, 49–83) were evaluated. TLIFs were performed at 2.2 levels on average (range, 1–4) in addition to 6.0 (range, 4–9) levels of posterolateral instrumented fusion. The preoperative mean lumbar lordosis was 37.6° (range, 16°–55°) compared to 40.5° (range, 26°–59.2°) postoperatively. The preoperative mean coronal Cobb angle was 32.3° (range, 15°–55°) compared to 15.4° (range, 1°–49°) postoperatively. The mean operative time was 528 min (range, 276–906), estimated blood loss was 1091.7 mL (range, 150–2500), and hospitalization time was 8.0 days (range, 3–28). A baseline mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 7.6 (range, 4–10) decreased to 3.6 (range, 0–8) postoperatively. There were a total of 14 (49%) hardware and/or surgical technique related complications, and 8 (28%) patients required additional surgeries. Five (17%) patients developed pseudoarthrosis. The systemic complications (31%) included death (1), cardiopulmonary arrest with resuscitation (1), myocardial infarction (1), pneumonia (5), and pulmonary embolism (1).

Conclusion:

This study suggests that although the TLIF approach is a feasible and effective method to treat degenerative adult scoliosis, it is associated with a high rate of intra- and postoperative complications and a long recovery process.

Adult spine deformity

Adult spinal deformity may occur as the result of a number of conditions and patients may present with a heterogeneous group of symptoms. Multiple etiologies may cause spinal deformity; however, symptoms are associated with progressive and asymmetric degeneration of the spinal elements potentially leading to neural element compression. Symptoms and clinical presentation vary and may be related to progressive deformity, axial back pain, and/or neurologic symptoms. Spinal deformity is becoming more common as adults 55-64 years of age are the fastest growing proportion of the U.S. population. As the percentage of elderly in the United States accelerates, more patients are expected to present with painful spinal conditions, potentially requiring spinal surgery. The decision between operative and nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity is based on the severity and type of the patient's symptoms as well as the magnitude and risk of potential interventions.