201
|
Graves KD, Vegella P, Poggi EA, Peshkin BN, Tong A, Isaacs C, Finch C, Kelly S, Taylor KL, Luta G, Schwartz MD. Long-term psychosocial outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: differences across affected status and risk-reducing surgery choice. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012; 21:445-55. [PMID: 22328347 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have documented the short-term impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) testing; however, little research has examined the long-term impact of testing. We conducted the first long-term prospective study of psychosocial outcomes in a U.S. sample of women who had BRCA1/2 testing. METHODS Participants were 464 women who underwent genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations. Prior to testing, we measured sociodemographics, clinical variables, and cancer specific and general distress. At long-term follow-up (Median = 5.0 years; Range = 3.4-9.1 years), we assessed cancer-specific and genetic testing distress, perceived stress, and perceived cancer risk. We evaluated the impact of BRCA1/2 test result and risk-reducing surgery on long-term psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS Among participants who had been affected with breast or ovarian cancer, BRCA1/2 carriers reported higher genetic testing distress (β = 0.41, P < 0.0001), uncertainty (β = 0.18, P < 0.0001), and perceived stress (β = 0.17, P = 0.005) compared with women who received negative (i.e., uninformative) results. Among women unaffected with breast/ovarian cancer, BRCA1/2 carriers reported higher genetic testing distress (β = 0.39, P < 0.0001) and lower positive testing experiences (β = 0.25, P = 0.008) than women with negative results. Receipt of risk-reducing surgery was associated with lower perceived cancer risk (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In this first prospective long-term study in a U.S. sample, we found modestly increased distress in BRCA1/2 carriers compared with women who received uninformative or negative test results. Despite this modest increase in distress, we found no evidence of clinically significant dysfunction. IMPACT Although a positive BRCA1/2 result remains salient among carriers years after testing, testing does not seem to impact long-term psychologic dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristi D Graves
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Control Program, Breast Cancer Program, Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Familial Cancer Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia 20007, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
202
|
Manchanda R, Burnell M, Abdelraheim A, Johnson M, Sharma A, Benjamin E, Brunell C, Saridogan E, Gessler S, Oram D, Side L, Rosenthal AN, Jacobs I, Menon U. Factors influencing uptake and timing of risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at risk of familial ovarian cancer: a competing risk time to event analysis. BJOG 2012; 119:527-36. [PMID: 22260402 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03257.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors affecting uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) over time in women at high-risk of familial ovarian cancer. DESIGN Prospective observational cohort. SETTING Tertiary high-risk familial gynaecological cancer clinic. POPULATION/SAMPLE New clinic attendees between March 2004 and November 2009, fulfilling the high-risk criteria for the UK Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study. METHODS Risk management options discussed included RRSO and ovarian surveillance. Outcome data were analysed from a bespoke database. The competing risk method was used to model the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of RRSO over time, and the sub-hazard ratio (SHR) was used to assess the strength of the association of variables of interest with RRSO. Gray's test was used to evaluate the difference in CIF between two groups and multivariable competing risk regression analysis was used to model the cumulative probabilities of covariates on the CIF. RESULTS Of 1133 eligible women, 265 (21.4%) opted for RRSO and 868 (69.9%) chose screening. Women undergoing RRSO were older (49 years, interquartile range 12.2 years) than those preferring screening (43.4 years, interquartile range 11.9 years) (P < 0.0005). The CIF for RRSO at 5 years was 0.55 (95% CI 0.45-0.64) for BRCA1/2 carriers and 0.22 (95% CI 0.19-0.26) for women of unknown mutation status (P < 0.0001); 0.42 (95% CI 0.36-0.47) for postmenopausal women (P < 0.0001); 0.29 (95% CI 0.25-0.33) for parity ≥1 (P = 0.009) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.39-0.55) for a personal history of breast cancer (P < 0.0001). Variables of significance from the regression analysis were: a BRCA1/2 mutation (SHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.7-3.14), postmenopausal status (SHR 2.16, 95% CI 1.62-2.87)) and a personal history of breast cancer (SHR 1.5, 95% CI 1.09-2.06). CONCLUSIONS Decision-making is a complex process and women opt for surgery many years after initial risk assessment. BRCA carriers, postmenopausal women and women who had breast cancer are significantly more likely to opt for preventative surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, EGA Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
203
|
Schwartz MD, Isaacs C, Graves KD, Poggi E, Peshkin BN, Gell C, Finch C, Kelly S, Taylor KL, Perley L. Long-term outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: risk reduction and surveillance. Cancer 2012; 118:510-7. [PMID: 21717445 PMCID: PMC3286617 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2011] [Accepted: 04/25/2011] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing to benefit public health, mutation carriers must initiate appropriate risk management strategies. There has been little research examining the long-term use and prospective predictors of the full range of risk management behaviors among women who have undergone BRCA1/2 testing. We evaluated long-term uptake and predictors of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM), risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO), chemoprevention, and cancer screening among women at a mean of 5.3 years after testing. METHODS The study participants comprised 465 women who underwent BRCA1/2 testing. Prior to genetic counseling, we measured family/personal cancer history, sociodemographics, perceived risk, cancer-specific distress, and general distress. We contacted patients at a mean of 5.3 years after testing to measure use of RRM, RRBSO, chemoprevention, and breast and ovarian cancer screening. RESULTS Among participants with intact breasts and/or ovaries at the time of testing, BRCA1/2 carriers were significantly more likely to obtain RRM (37%) and RRBSO (65%) compared with women who received uninformative (RRM, 6.8%; RRBSO, 13.3%) or negative (RRM, 0%; RRBSO, 1.9%) results. Among carriers, precounseling anxiety was associated with subsequent uptake of RRM. RRO was predicted by age. Carriers were also more likely have used breast cancer chemoprevention and have undergone magnetic resonance imaging screening. CONCLUSION This prospective evaluation of the uptake and predictors of long-term management outcomes provides a clearer picture of decision making in this population. At a mean of 5.3 years after testing, more than 80% of carriers had obtained RRM, RRBSO, or both, suggesting that BRCA1/2 testing is likely to have a favorable effect on breast and ovarian cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc D Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Control Program, Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Familial Cancer Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
204
|
Metcalfe KA, Mian N, Enmore M, Poll A, Llacuachaqui M, Nanda S, Sun P, Hughes KS, Narod SA. Long-term follow-up of Jewish women with a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation who underwent population genetic screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 133:735-40. [PMID: 22240989 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1941-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2011] [Accepted: 12/22/2011] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
There are two mutations in BRCA1 and one in BRCA2, which are present in up to 2.5% of Jewish women. Population genetic testing for Jewish women has been proposed; however, it is unclear how this would impact the uptake of cancer prevention options and psychosocial functioning in women with a positive result. Two thousand and eighty unselected Jewish women were tested for the Jewish BRCA mutations, and 1.1% were positive. Cancer-related distress was measured before testing, and at 1 and 2 years post-testing. Information on uptake of cancer risk reduction options was collected at 2 years. Breast and ovarian cancer risks were estimated using BRCAPRO. Within 2 years of receiving a positive result, 11.1% of women had prophylactic mastectomy, and 89.5% had a prophylactic oophorectomy. The mean breast cancer risk was estimated to be 37.2% at time of testing, compared to 20.9% at 2 years post-testing. The mean ovarian cancer risk was estimated to be 24.5% at time of testing, compared to 7.5% at 2 years following testing. Distress decreased between 1 and 2 years for women with prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy (P = 0.02), and for women with prophylactic oophorectomy only (P = 0.04) but not for those with neither surgery. The majority of Jewish women with a BRCA mutation identified through a population screening elected prophylactic oophorectomy, but a few had a prophylactic mastectomy. Uptake of either surgery resulted in decreased distress. Provision of population BRCA testing resulted in reduced risks of breast and ovarian cancers in women with a mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A Metcalfe
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
205
|
Kurian AW, Munoz DF, Rust P, Schackmann EA, Smith M, Clarke L, Mills MA, Plevritis SK. Online tool to guide decisions for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:497-506. [PMID: 22231042 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.38.6060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations must choose between prophylactic surgeries and screening to manage their high risks of breast and ovarian cancer, comparing options in terms of cancer incidence, survival, and quality of life. A clinical decision tool could guide these complex choices. METHODS We built a Monte Carlo model for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, simulating breast screening with annual mammography plus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from ages 25 to 69 years and prophylactic mastectomy (PM) and/or prophylactic oophorectomy (PO) at various ages. Modeled outcomes were cancer incidence, tumor features that shape treatment recommendations, overall survival, and cause-specific mortality. We adapted the model into an online tool to support shared decision making. RESULTS We compared strategies on cancer incidence and survival to age 70 years; for example, PO plus PM at age 25 years optimizes both outcomes (incidence, 4% to 11%; survival, 80% to 83%), whereas PO at age 40 years plus MRI screening offers less effective prevention, yet similar survival (incidence, 36% to 57%; survival, 74% to 80%). To characterize patients' treatment and survivorship experiences, we reported the tumor features and treatments associated with risk-reducing interventions; for example, in most BRCA2 mutation carriers (81%), MRI screening diagnoses stage I, hormone receptor-positive breast cancers, which may not require chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Cancer risk-reducing options for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers vary in their impact on cancer incidence, recommended treatments, quality of life, and survival. To guide decisions informed by multiple health outcomes, we provide an online tool for joint use by patients with their physicians (http://brcatool.stanford.edu).
Collapse
|
206
|
Kumar NB, Vadaparampil ST, Mahajan N, Lilienfeld HS, Lee JH, Laronga C, Hakam A, Hein JJ, Egan KM, Arun B, Pal T. Metformin- A Promising Agent for Chemoprevention in BRCA1 Carriers. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 1. [PMID: 26097796 PMCID: PMC4474476 DOI: 10.4172/2161-1041.1000104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nagi B Kumar
- Departments of Cancer Epidemiology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas ; Oncological Sciences University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa Florida
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Health Outcomes and Behavior, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas ; Oncological Sciences University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa Florida
| | - Nupam Mahajan
- Molecular Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas ; Oncological Sciences University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa Florida
| | - Howard S Lilienfeld
- Breast Cancer, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas ; Oncological Sciences University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa Florida
| | - Ji-Hyun Lee
- Departments of Cancer Epidemiology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas ; Breast Cancer, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christine Laronga
- Breast Cancer, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas ; Oncological Sciences University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa Florida
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Pathology, at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute ; Oncological Sciences University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa Florida
| | - John J Hein
- Departments of Cancer Epidemiology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas ; Oncological Sciences University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa Florida
| | - Kathleen M Egan
- Departments of Cancer Epidemiology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas ; Oncological Sciences University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa Florida
| | - Banu Arun
- Breast Medical Oncology and Clinical Cancer Prevention, and Co-Director of Clinical Cancer Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tuya Pal
- Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas ; Oncological Sciences University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa Florida
| |
Collapse
|
207
|
Psychometric testing of the decisional conflict scale: genetic testing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Nurs Res 2011; 60:368-77. [PMID: 22048556 DOI: 10.1097/nnr.0b013e3182337dad] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is attributed mostly to mutations in the Breast Cancer 1 and Breast Cancer 2 genes (BRCA1/2). Mutation carriers of BRCA1/2 genes have significantly higher risk for developing breast cancer compared with the general population (55%-85% vs. 12%) and for developing ovarian cancer (20%-60% vs. 1.5%). The availability of genetic testing enables mutation carriers to make informed decisions about managing their cancer risk (e.g., risk-reducing surgery). However, uptake of testing for HBOC among high-risk individuals is low, indicating the need to better understand and measure the decisional conflict associated with this process. OBJECTIVE : The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the modified Decisional Conflict Scale for use in decisions associated with genetic testing for HBOC. METHODS : This cross-sectional cohort study, recruited women who pursued genetic testing for HBOC in two genetic risk assessment clinics affiliated with a large comprehensive cancer center and one of their female relatives who did not pursue testing. The final sample consisted of 342 women who completed all 16 items of the Decisional Conflict Scale. The psychometric properties of the scale were assessed using tests of reliability and validity, including face, content, construct, contrast, convergent, divergent, and predictive validity. RESULTS : Factor analysis using principal axis factoring with oblimin rotation elicited a three-factor structure: (a) Lack of Knowledge About the Decision (α = .97), (b) Lack of Autonomy in Decision Making (α = .94), and (c) Lack of Confidence in Decision Making (α = .87). These factors explained 82% of the variance in decisional conflict about genetic testing. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .96. DISCUSSION : The instrument is an important tool for researchers and healthcare providers working with women at risk for HBOC who are deciding whether genetic testing is the right choice for them.
Collapse
|
208
|
Sidon L, Ingham S, Clancy T, Clayton R, Clarke A, Jones EA, Lalloo F, Evans DGR. Uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: evidence for lower uptake in women affected by breast cancer and older women. Br J Cancer 2011; 106:775-9. [PMID: 22187038 PMCID: PMC3322942 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bilateral risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (BRRSO) is the only effective way of reducing mortality from ovarian cancer. This study investigates uptake of BRRSO in 700 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers from Greater Manchester. METHODS Dates of last follow-up and BRRSO were obtained, and the following variables were investigated: ovarian cancer risk/gene, age and breast cancer history. The date of the genetic mutation report was the initiation for Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS The uptake of BRRSO in BRCA1 mutation carriers was 54.5% (standard error 3.6%) at 5 years post testing compared with 45.5% (standard error 3.2%) in BRCA2 mutation carriers (P=0.045). The 40-59 years category showed the greatest uptake for BRRSO and uptake was significantly lower in the over 60 s (P<0.0001). Of the unaffected BRCA1 mutation carriers, 65% (standard error 5.1%) opted for surgery at 5 years post-testing compared with 41.1% (standard error 5.1%) in affected BRCA1 mutation carriers (P=0.045). CONCLUSION The uptake of BRRSO is lower in women previously affected by breast cancer and in older women. As there is no efficient method for early detection of ovarian cancer, uptake should ideally be greater. Counselling should be offered to ensure BRCA1/2 mutation carriers make an informed decision about managing their ovarian cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Sidon
- Department of Genetic Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
209
|
Quality of life and health status after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in women who carry a BRCA mutation: A review. Maturitas 2011; 70:261-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2011] [Accepted: 08/01/2011] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
210
|
Finch A, Metcalfe KA, Chiang J, Elit L, McLaughlin J, Springate C, Esplen MJ, Demsky R, Murphy J, Rosen B, Narod SA. The impact of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy on quality of life and psychological distress in women with a BRCA mutation. Psychooncology 2011; 22:212-9. [PMID: 21913283 DOI: 10.1002/pon.2041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2011] [Revised: 06/28/2011] [Accepted: 06/30/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to measure the impact of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy on health-related quality of life and psychological distress in women. METHODS Women who underwent prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy between August 20, 2003 and June 26, 2008 because of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were invited to participate. Participants completed three questionnaires (SF-12(®) Health Survey, Brief Symptom Inventory and the Impact of Events Scale) before prophylactic surgery and again 1 year after surgery. Measures of health-related quality of life, of general psychological distress and of ovarian cancer worry before and after surgery were compared. RESULTS Few women who underwent salpingo-oophorectomy experienced a worsening in physical or mental health functioning after salpingo-oophorectomy. On average, women experienced less ovarian cancer-specific worry after surgery; 34.3% experienced moderate to severe ovarian cancer-specific distress before surgery, compared with 18.6% after surgery. CONCLUSIONS For most women, physical and mental health-related quality of life did not deteriorate after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy, and they were less worried about ovarian cancer. A subset of women continued to experience moderate to severe cancer-specific distress. Identification of these women is important in order to provide continued counseling and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Finch
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
211
|
Croshaw RL, Marshall ML, Williams TL, Erb KM, Julian TB. Prophylactic and Therapeutic Breast Conservation in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers. Int J Breast Cancer 2011; 2011:481563. [PMID: 22295226 PMCID: PMC3262559 DOI: 10.4061/2011/481563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2010] [Revised: 04/12/2011] [Accepted: 05/11/2011] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for sporadic breast cancer has been widely accepted by surgeons and patients alike. While BCT is associated with a higher risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), it has not been shown to decrease overall survival (OS) in comparison with mastectomy. Many women with a BRCA1/2 mutation opt for mastectomy instead of breast-conserving measures at the time of a breast cancer diagnosis. In some cases, this is due to fear of aggressive disease, but to date, there have been no studies offering strong evidence that breast conservation should not be offered to these women. BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer has not been found to be more aggressive or resistant to treatment than comparable sporadic tumors, and no study has shown an actual survival advantage for mastectomy in appropriately treated affected mutation carriers. This paper reviews the available literature for breast conservation and surgical decision making in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randal L Croshaw
- Allegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212-4746, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
212
|
Katapodi MC, Northouse L, Pierce P, Milliron KJ, Liu G, Merajver SD. Differences Between Women Who Pursued Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Their At-Risk Relatives Who Did Not. Oncol Nurs Forum 2011; 38:572-81. [DOI: 10.1188/11.onf.572-581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
213
|
Clinical Considerations of BRCA1- and BRCA2-Mutation Carriers: A Review. Int J Surg Oncol 2011; 2011:374012. [PMID: 22312502 PMCID: PMC3263675 DOI: 10.1155/2011/374012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2011] [Accepted: 06/16/2011] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals who carry an inherited mutation in the breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA2 genes have a significant risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer over the course of their lifetime. As a result, there are important considerations for the clinician in the counseling, followup and management of mutation carriers. This review outlines salient aspects in the approach to patients at high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer, including criteria for genetic testing, screening guidelines, surgical prophylaxis, and chemoprevention.
Collapse
|
214
|
Surveillance of survivors: Follow-up after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 122:339-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2011] [Revised: 03/31/2011] [Accepted: 04/02/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
215
|
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in Swedish women at high risk of breast cancer: a national survey. Ann Surg 2011; 253:1147-54. [PMID: 21587115 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e318214b55a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE This study attempted a national inventory of all bilateral prophylactic mastectomies performed in Sweden between 1995 and 2005 in high-risk women without a previous breast malignancy. The primary aim was to investigate the breast cancer incidence after surgery. Secondary aims were to describe the preoperative risk assessment, operation techniques, complications, histopathological findings, and regional differences. METHODS Geneticists, oncologists and surgeons performing prophylactic breast surgery were asked to identify all women eligible for inclusion in their region. The medical records were reviewed in each region and the data were analyzed centrally. The BOADICEA risk assessment model was used to calculate the number of expected/prevented breast cancers during the follow-up period. RESULTS A total of 223 women operated on in 8 hospitals were identified. During a mean follow-up of 6.6 years, no primary breast cancer was observed compared with 12 expected cases. However, 1 woman succumbed 9 years post mastectomy to widespread adenocarcinoma of uncertain origin. Median age at operation was 40 years. A total of 58% were BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. All but 3 women underwent breast reconstruction, 208 with implants and 12 with autologous tissue. Four small, unifocal, invasive cancers and 4 ductal carcinoma in situ were found in the mastectomy specimens. The incidence of nonbreast related complications was low (3%). Implant loss due to infection/necrosis occurred in 21 women (10%) but a majority received a new implant later. In total, 64% of the women underwent at least 1unanticipated secondary operation. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is safe and efficacious in reducing future breast cancer in asymptomatic women at high risk. Unanticipated reoperations are common. Given the small number of patients centralization seems justified.
Collapse
|
216
|
Poly(ADP-Ribose) Inhibition: Exploring a New Approach to Breast Cancer Prevention in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2011. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-011-0049-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
217
|
Silver K, Kukulka G, Gorniewicz J, Rayman K, Sharp R. Genetic susceptibility testing for beryllium: worker knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes. Am J Ind Med 2011; 54:521-32. [PMID: 21557280 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2011] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to gain insight into workers' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes on the subject of testing for genetic susceptibility to beryllium. METHODS Five focus groups were held with 30 current and former beryllium workers and nine family members. Audio recordings were transcribed and assessed by hierarchical coding using an inductive approach. RESULTS Some workers were unclear about the distinction between genotoxicity and heritability. A key finding is that they perceived the benefits of a positive test result to be related to enhanced autonomous decision-making. The major concern cited by participants was potential abuse of genetic information by employers. Complete financial separation of a prospective testing entity from the employer was seen as crucial. CONCLUSIONS A window of opportunity exists to create regional partnerships for translational research on genetic susceptibility testing. Such partnerships would involve labor, management, public health scientists, primary care professionals, and other stakeholders. They would be critical to identifying testing strategies that maximize worker autonomy along with the public health advantages of genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Silver
- Department of Environmental Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
218
|
Carroll PA, Nolan C, Clarke R, Farrell M, Gleeson N, Boyle T, Dunne B, Daly PA, Kennedy MJ, Connolly EM. Surgical management of an Irish cohort of BRCA-mutation carriers. Breast 2011; 20:419-23. [PMID: 21570850 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2010] [Revised: 04/03/2011] [Accepted: 04/10/2011] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Little information is available regarding the management of BRCA-related breast cancer in Ireland. A cancer genetics programme was initiated in 1992 at our institution to provide counselling and expert management for those with cancers resulting from inherited predisposition. We examined a cohort of BRCA mutation-carriers treated at a single institution over 16 years. A total of 107 women from 57 families were found to be carriers of mutations in BRCA1/2. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was the most common prophylactic surgery performed. Overall survival between BRCA-related and sporadic breast cancer was equivalent. This is the first publication on surgical management of BRCA-mutation carriers in Ireland. It is imperative that those considered likely to harbour a mutation are referred early to a dedicated clinic so that appropriate counselling, testing and subsequent management to reduce the risk of dying from cancer can be undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Carroll
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
219
|
Kwong A, Wong CHN, Shea C, Suen DTK, Choi CLY. Choice of management of southern Chinese BRCA mutation carriers. World J Surg 2011; 34:1416-26. [PMID: 20182723 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0477-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mutations in the BRCA genes confer greater risk of developing breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer. Families carrying the mutation can have intensive surveillance and take preventative measures. This is the first report on the uptake of such interventions in Chinese mutation carriers residing in Asia. METHODS Breast and ovarian cancer index patients and family members referred for genetic counselling and testing who are found to carry the BRCA mutations were included in this multicenter study. RESULTS A total of 31 patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer were found to carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Forty-one tested family members also carried the mutations. Of the females, 85.7% of the index patients opted for breast surveillance and 23.8% for prophylactic mastectomy. Of the family members, 82.4% chose breast surveillance and 17.7% had prophylactic mastectomy. The majority of index patients and family members preferred ovarian surveillance (84 and 82.4%). Amongst the index patients, 32% decided for prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy; 17.6% of the family members who did not have history of ovarian cancer decided to have prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy. All male index patients agreed to breast and prostate surveillance, including breast clinical examination and PSA monitoring. For those male family members found to be BRCA mutation carriers, 56.3% agreed to have breast surveillance and 66.7% agreed to have prostate surveillance. No index patient or family member agreed to any form of chemoprevention. CONCLUSIONS Chinese BRCA mutation carriers have a higher uptake of cancer surveillance than prophylactic surgery and have a lack of interest in the use of chemoprevention drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ava Kwong
- Division of Breast Surgery, The University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
220
|
Warner E. Impact of MRI surveillance and breast cancer detection in young women with BRCA mutations. Ann Oncol 2011; 22 Suppl 1:i44-9. [PMID: 21285150 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Based on several observational studies that have yielded consistent results, the combination of annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plus mammography is now the standard of care for screening women with BRCA mutations who decline risk-reducing mastectomy. However, many of these women will develop breast cancer at a young age and, while most of these cancers will be very early stage, oncologists need to be aware of the unique issues faced by women in this age group due to the diagnosis and treatment. Fear of death, loss of fertility, premature menopause, relationship stress, career disruption and financial losses are only some of the problems that are either unique to young women or much more pronounced in this age group. Urgent referral to a fertility specialist of any woman who has not yet completed her family should be made as soon as the possible need for systemic treatment is recognized. The oncologist should also have a low threshold for referring young women to professionals experienced in navigating young women and their families through the psychosocial trauma of a breast cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Warner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
221
|
Paradiso A, Formenti S. Hereditary breast cancer: clinical features and risk reduction strategies. Ann Oncol 2011; 22 Suppl 1:i31-6. [PMID: 21285148 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Risk-reduction interventions for BRCA-related breast cancer are relevant not only for clinical decisions in breast cancer patients but also for healthy subjects who are potential candidates to undergo similar interventions. The literature on the impact of different surgical options and adjuvant systemic approaches aimed towards risk reduction for ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer recurrences is briefly reviewed. Breast-conserving surgery is associated with a higher probability of local recurrence, but is counterbalanced by effectiveness of chemotherapy in reducing this risk. Consistent support for the hypothesis that antiestrogens are effective in reducing contralateral breast cancer risks is available from the literature. On the other hand, data on chemoprevention approaches for healthy subjects are too preliminary to draw any conclusions. Studies including conventional and newer hormonal drugs are needed to demonstrate the benefit of chemoprevention approaches. These may also deepen our knowledge on possible differences in the likelihood of clinical benefit to be expected among BRCA1- and BRCA2-altered tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Paradiso
- Scientific Direction, National Cancer Center, Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
222
|
Manchanda R, Abdelraheim A, Johnson M, Rosenthal AN, Benjamin E, Brunell C, Burnell M, Side L, Gessler S, Saridogan E, Oram D, Jacobs I, Menon U. Outcome of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA carriers and women of unknown mutation status. BJOG 2011; 118:814-24. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02920.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
223
|
Fakkert IE, Jansen L, Meijer K, Kok T, Oosterwijk JC, Mourits MJE, de Bock GH. Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers after risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 129:157-64. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1423-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2011] [Accepted: 02/21/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
224
|
Skytte AB, Crüger D, Gerster M, Laenkholm AV, Lang C, Brøndum-Nielsen K, Andersen MK, Sunde L, Kølvraa S, Gerdes AM. Breast cancer after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. Clin Genet 2011; 79:431-7. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01604.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
225
|
Greene MH, Mai PL, Schwartz PE. Does bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian retention warrant consideration as a temporary bridge to risk-reducing bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:19.e1-6. [PMID: 20619389 PMCID: PMC3138129 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2010] [Revised: 04/09/2010] [Accepted: 05/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the most definitive surgical intervention for ovarian cancer risk reduction among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. For women who have completed child-bearing but who are not ready for RRSO, bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian retention (BSOR) might serve as a temporary measure while definitive risk-reducing surgery is being contemplated. Here we summarize recent insights into the pathogenesis of hereditary ovarian cancer that might provide a basis for consideration of the proposed BSOR management strategy and outline the evidence for and against this potential risk-reducing intervention. Based on the evidence, we suggest that there may be sufficient merit in this proposed intervention to consider evaluating it formally, perhaps through an intergroup-based clinical trial. In the meanwhile, we believe that BSOR should be considered an investigational risk management option of unproven clinical usefulness, particularly because delay in bilateral oophorectomy theoretically could reduce the protective effect against breast cancer that has been documented in women who have undergone RRSO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark H Greene
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Clinical Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
226
|
Rijnsburger AJ, Obdeijn IM, Kaas R, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Boetes C, Loo CE, Wasser MN, Bergers E, Kok T, Muller SH, Peterse H, Tollenaar RA, Hoogerbrugge N, Meijer S, Bartels CC, Seynaeve C, Hooning MJ, Kriege M, Schmitz PIM, Oosterwijk JC, de Koning HJ, Rutgers EJ, Klijn JG. BRCA1-Associated Breast Cancers Present Differently From BRCA2-Associated and Familial Cases: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:5265-73. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.2294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The Dutch MRI Screening Study on early detection of hereditary breast cancer started in 1999. We evaluated the long-term results including separate analyses of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and first results on survival. Patients and Methods Women with higher than 15% cumulative lifetime risk (CLTR) of breast cancer were screened with biannual clinical breast examination and annual mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Participants were divided into subgroups: carriers of a gene mutation (50% to 85% CLTR) and two familial groups with high (30% to 50% CLTR) or moderate risk (15% to 30% CLTR). Results Our update contains 2,157 eligible women including 599 mutation carriers (median follow-up of 4.9 years from entry) with 97 primary breast cancers detected (median follow-up of 5.0 years from diagnosis). MRI sensitivity was superior to that of mammography for invasive cancer (77.4% v 35.5%; P < .00005), but not for ductal carcinoma in situ. Results in the BRCA1 group were worse compared to the BRCA2, the high-, and the moderate-risk groups, respectively, for mammography sensitivity (25.0% v 61.5%, 45.5%, 46.7%), tumor size at diagnosis ≤ 1 cm (21.4% v 61.5%, 40.9%, 63.6%), proportion of DCIS (6.5% v 18.8%, 14.8%, 31.3%) and interval cancers (32.3% v 6.3%, 3.7%, 6.3%), and age at diagnosis younger than 30 years (9.7% v 0%). Cumulative distant metastasis-free and overall survival at 6 years in all 42 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with invasive breast cancer were 83.9% (95% CI, 64.1% to 93.3%) and 92.7% (95% CI, 79.0% to 97.6%), respectively, and 100% in the familial groups (n = 43). Conclusion Screening results were somewhat worse in BRCA1 mutation carriers, but 6-year survival was high in all risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana J. Rijnsburger
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Inge-Marie Obdeijn
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Reinoutje Kaas
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Madeleine M.A. Tilanus-Linthorst
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Carla Boetes
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Claudette E. Loo
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Martin N.J.M. Wasser
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth Bergers
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Theo Kok
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sara H. Muller
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Peterse
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Rob A.E.M. Tollenaar
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sybren Meijer
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Carina C.M. Bartels
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline Seynaeve
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje J. Hooning
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mieke Kriege
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Paul I. M. Schmitz
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan C. Oosterwijk
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Harry J. de Koning
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Emiel J.T. Rutgers
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan G.M. Klijn
- From the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam; Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Radboud University Medical Center and Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nijmegen; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and the Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
227
|
Abstract
After the discovery of the breast cancer–associated genes BRCA1 in 1994 and BRCA2 in 1995, genetic testing was introduced into clinical practice in North America and Europe[...]
Collapse
|
228
|
Pichert G, Jacobs C, Jacobs I, Menon U, Manchanda R, Johnson M, Hamed H, Firth C, Evison M, Tutt A, de Silva L, Langman C, Izatt L. Novel one-stop multidisciplinary follow-up clinic significantly improves cancer risk management in BRCA1/2 carriers. Fam Cancer 2010; 9:313-9. [PMID: 20300867 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-010-9333-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to measure the impact of a multidisciplinary one-stop follow-up clinic (MDOSC) on breast and ovarian surveillance, risk reducing surgery and enrolment in clinical trials in BRCA1/2 carriers. All BRCA1/2 carriers in our region were invited and chose which specialists to see in our MDOSC offering best practice using clinical protocols based on national guidelines and published data. Uptake was evaluated over 24 months recording numbers of individuals undergoing breast and ovarian surveillance, risk reducing surgery, newly diagnosed cancers, their method of detection and participation in clinical trials. 172 (60%) of invited BRCA1/2 carriers chose to attend the MDOSC. Breast surveillance was initiated in 88% and screening frequency altered in 14% of women to comply with national guidelines. Risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was chosen by 47% of women and an additional 39% were considering it. The rate of failure to remove fallopian tubes fell from 15 to 3% of procedures (P < 0.01) and peritoneal washings and serial sectioning of tubes and ovaries rose from 25% and 14% before, to 67% (P < 0.001) and 63% (P < 0.001) procedures, respectively, after initiation of our MDOSC. 24% of women considered and 18% decided to undergo risk reducing mastectomy during the follow-up period. Participation in clinical trials increased significantly from 51 to 229 enrolments (P < 0.001). Our novel MDOSC designed to devise an individually tailored cancer risk management strategy had a high uptake amongst our BRCA1/2 carriers. Attendance resulted in improved breast and ovarian cancer risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pichert
- Clinical Genetics Department, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Guys Hospital, 7th Floor Borough Wing, Great Maze Pond Road, SE1 9RT, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
229
|
Time to prophylactic surgery in BRCA1/2 carriers depends on psychological and other characteristics. Genet Med 2010; 12:801-7. [DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e3181f48d1c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
230
|
Mammographic surveillance in women younger than 50 years who have a family history of breast cancer: tumour characteristics and projected effect on mortality in the prospective, single-arm, FH01 study. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:1127-34. [PMID: 21093374 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70263-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence supports a reduction in mortality from breast cancer with mammographic screening in the general population of women aged 40-49 years, but the effect of family history is not clear. We aimed to establish whether screening affects the disease stage and projected mortality of women younger than 50 years who have a clinically significant family history of breast cancer. METHODS In the single-arm FH01 study, women at intermediate familial risk who were younger than 50 years were enrolled from 76 centres in the UK, and received yearly mammography. Women with BRCA mutations were not explicitly excluded, but would be rare in this group. To compare the FH01 cohort with women not receiving screening, two external comparison groups were used: the control group of the UK Age Trial (106,971 women aged 40-42 years at recruitment, from the general population [ie, average risk], followed up for 10 years), and a Dutch study of women with a family history of breast cancer (cancer cases aged 25-77 years, diagnosed 1980-2004). Study endpoints were size, node status, and histological grade of invasive tumours, and estimated mortality calculated from the Nottingham prognostic index (NPI) score, and adjusted for differences in underlying risk between the FH01 cohort and the control group of the UK Age Trial. This study is registered with the National Research Register, number N0484114809. FINDINGS 6710 women were enrolled between Jan 16, 2003, and Feb 28, 2007, and received yearly mammography for a mean of 4 years (SD 2) up until Nov 30, 2009; surveillance and reporting of cancers is still underway. 136 women were diagnosed with breast cancer: 105 (77%) at screening, 28 (21%) symptomatically in the interval between screening events, and three (2%) symptomatically after failing to attend their latest mammogram. Invasive tumours in the FH01 study were significantly smaller (p=0·0094), less likely to be node positive (p=0·0083), and of more favourable grade (p=0·0072) than were those in the control group of the UK Age Trial, and were significantly less likely to be node positive than were tumours in the Dutch study (p=0·012). Mean NPI score was significantly lower in the FH01 cohort than in the control group of the UK Age Trial (p=0·00079) or the Dutch study (p<0·0001). After adjustment for underlying risk, predicted 10-year mortality was significantly lower in the FH01 cohort (1·10%) than in the control group of the UK Age Trial (1·38%), with relative risk of 0·80 (95% CI 0·66-0·96; p=0·022). INTERPRETATION Yearly mammography in women with a medium familial risk of breast cancer is likely to be effective in prevention of deaths from breast cancer.
Collapse
|
231
|
Narod SA. BRCA mutations in the management of breast cancer: the state of the art. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010; 7:702-7. [DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
232
|
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, a novel class of drugs that target tumors with DNA repair defects, have received tremendous enthusiasm. Early preclinical studies identified BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors to be highly sensitive to PARP inhibitors as a result of homologous recombination defect. Based on this premise, PARP inhibitors have been tested in early phase clinical trials as a single agent in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers and in combination with chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients. For high-risk populations, use of PARP inhibition as a prevention agent has been postulated, but no robust preclinical or clinical studies exist yet. We review the preclinical and clinical studies in treatment of breast cancer and rationale for use of PARP inhibitors as a prevention agent for high-risk populations. Of significance, PARP inhibitors vary significantly in mechanism of action, dosing intervals, and toxicities, which are highlighted in this review.
Collapse
|
233
|
Miller SM, Roussi P, Daly MB, Scarpato J. New strategies in ovarian cancer: uptake and experience of women at high risk of ovarian cancer who are considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16:5094-106. [PMID: 20829330 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-2953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Here, we review factors associated with uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy by women at increased hereditary risk for ovarian cancer, as well as quality of life issues following surgery. Forty-one research studies identified through PubMed and PsychInfo met inclusion criteria. Older age, having had children, a family history of ovarian cancer, a personal history of breast cancer, prophylactic mastectomy, and BRCA1/2 mutation carrier status increase the likelihood of undergoing surgery. Psychosocial variables predictive of surgery uptake include greater perceived risk of ovarian cancer and cancer-related anxiety. Most women report satisfaction with their decision to undergo surgery and both lower perceived ovarian cancer risk and less cancer-related anxiety as benefits. Hormonal deprivation is the main disadvantage reported, particularly by premenopausal women who are not on hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). The evidence is mixed about satisfaction with the level of information provided prior to surgery, although generally, women report receiving insufficient information about the pros and cons of HRT. These findings indicate that when designing decision aids, demographic, medical history, and psychosocial variables need to be addressed in order to facilitate quality decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne M Miller
- Psychosocial and Biobehavioral Medicine Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, Pennsylvania 19012, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
234
|
Kwon JS, Gutierrez-Barrera AM, Young D, Sun CC, Daniels MS, Lu KH, Arun B. Expanding the criteria for BRCA mutation testing in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:4214-20. [PMID: 20733129 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.0719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Every year approximately 25% of women diagnosed with breast cancer are younger than 50 years of age, and almost 10% of them have a BRCA mutation. Not all potential carriers are identified by existing criteria for BRCA testing. We estimated the costs and benefits of different BRCA testing criteria for women with breast cancer younger than 50 years. METHODS We developed a Markov Monte Carlo simulation to compare six criteria for BRCA mutation testing: (1) no testing (reference); (2) medullary breast cancer in patients younger than 50 years; (3) any breast cancer in patients younger than 40 years; (4) triple negative (TN) breast cancer in patients younger than 40 years; (5) TN breast cancer in patients younger than 50 years; (6) any breast cancer in patients younger than 50 years. Net health benefits were life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy, and primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The model estimated the number of new breast and ovarian cancer cases. RESULTS BRCA mutation testing for all women with breast cancer who were younger than 50 years could prevent the highest number of breast and ovarian cancer cases, but with unfavorable ICERs. Testing women with TN breast cancers who were younger than 50 years was cost-effective with an ICER of $8,027 per year of life gained ($9,084 per quality-adjusted life-year), and could reduce subsequent breast and ovarian cancer risks by 23% and 41%, respectively, compared with the reference strategy. CONCLUSION Testing women with TN breast cancers who were younger than 50 years for BRCA mutations is a cost-effective strategy and should be adopted into current guidelines for genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice S Kwon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia and British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
235
|
Manders P, Pijpe A, Hooning MJ, Kluijt I, Vasen HFA, Hoogerbrugge N, van Asperen CJ, Meijers-Heijboer H, Ausems MGEM, van Os TA, Gomez-Garcia EB, Brohet RM, van Leeuwen FE, Rookus MA. Body weight and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 126:193-202. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1120-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2010] [Accepted: 08/07/2010] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
236
|
Hamilton RJ, Kahwati LC, Kinsinger LS. Knowledge and use of finasteride for the prevention of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19:2164-71. [PMID: 20699373 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The knowledge about and use of chemopreventive agents for prostate cancer by physicians has not been described. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) showed that finasteride was effective in reducing the incidence of prostate cancer. We examined the influence of the PCPT on finasteride prescribing within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHODS We assessed trends on monthly new and total prescriptions for finasteride filled within the VHA from January 2000 to December 2005. Additionally, all VHA urologists and a random sample of VHA primary care physicians (PCP) were surveyed about their use of finasteride. RESULTS The number of men starting finasteride grew over the study period. Publication of the PCPT was not significantly associated with any change in this pattern (P = 0.45). Fifty-seven percent of urologists and 40% of PCPs endorsed prescribing finasteride more frequently in 2006 than 5 years prior. However, among those who reported changing prescribing patterns, fewer than 2% reported being influenced by the PCPT. Sixty-four percent of urologists and 80% of PCPs never prescribe finasteride for prostate cancer chemoprevention; 55% of urologists cited concerns of inducing high-grade tumors, whereas 52% of PCPs did not know it could be used for chemoprevention. CONCLUSIONS The number of men starting finasteride in the VHA increased over time, but the change did not seem to be due to increased use of finasteride for chemoprevention. Publication of the PCPT seemed to have little influence over the study period. IMPACT Physicians may not readily accept the use of chemopreventive agents for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department ofSurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
237
|
Howard AF, Bottorff JL, Balneaves LG, Kim-Sing C. Women's constructions of the 'right time' to consider decisions about risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing oophorectomy. BMC Womens Health 2010; 10:24. [PMID: 20687957 PMCID: PMC2927493 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-10-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2010] [Accepted: 08/05/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women who are notified they carry a BRCA1/2 mutation are presented with surgical options to reduce their risk of breast and ovarian cancer, including risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing oophorectomy (RRO). Growing evidence suggests that a sub-group of women do not make decisions about RRM and RRO immediately following genetic testing, but rather, consider these decisions years later. Women's perspectives on the timing of these decisions are not well understood. Accordingly, the purpose of this research was to describe how women construct the 'right time' to consider decisions about RRM and RRO. METHODS In-depth interviews were conducted with 22 BRCA1/2 carrier women and analyzed using qualitative, constant comparative methods. RESULTS The time that lapsed between receipt of genetic test results and receipt of RRM or RRO ranged from three months to nine years. The findings highlighted the importance of considering decisions about RRM and RRO one at a time. The women constructed the 'right time' to consider these decisions to be when: (1) decisions fit into their lives, (2) they had enough time to think about decisions, (3) they were ready emotionally to deal with the decisions and the consequences, (4) all the issues and conflicts were sorted out, (5) there were better options available, and (6) the health care system was ready for them. CONCLUSIONS These findings offer novel insights relevant to health care professionals who provide decision support to women considering RRM and RRO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fuchsia Howard
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joan L Bottorff
- Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Canada
| | | | - Charmaine Kim-Sing
- British Columbia Cancer Agency & Faculty of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
238
|
Comparative effectiveness of screening and prevention strategies among BRCA1/2-affected mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 125:837-47. [PMID: 20644999 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1043-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2010] [Accepted: 07/02/2010] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Comparative effectiveness research has become an integral part of health care planning in most developed countries. In a simulated cohort of women, aged 30-65, who tested positive for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, we compared outcomes of mammography with and without MRI, prophylactic oophorectomy with and without mastectomy, mastectomy alone, and chemoprevention. METHODS Using Treeage 9.02 software, we developed Markov models with 25,000 Monte Carlo simulations and conducted probabilistic sensitivity analysis. We based mutation penetrance rates, breast and ovarian cancer incidence, and mortality rates, and costs in terms of 2009 dollars, on published studies and data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End RESULTS (SEER) Program and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. We used preference ratings obtained from mutation carriers and controls to adjust survival for quality of life (QALYs). RESULTS For BRCA1 mutation carriers, prophylactic oophorectomy at $1,741 per QALY, was more cost effective than both surgeries and dominated all other interventions. For BRCA2 carriers, prophylactic oophorectomy, at $4,587 per QALY, was more cost effective than both surgeries. Without quality adjustment, both mastectomy and BSO surgeries dominated all other interventions. In all simulations, preventive surgeries or chemoprevention dominated or were more cost effective than screening because screening modalities were costly. CONCLUSION Our analysis suggested that among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, prophylactic surgery would dominate or be cost effective compared to chemoprevention and screening. Annual screening with MRI and mammography was the most effective strategy because it was associated with the longest quality-adjusted survival, but it was also very expensive.
Collapse
|
239
|
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations across race and ethnicity: distribution and clinical implications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 22:72-8. [PMID: 19841585 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0b013e328332dca3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize evidence on the prevalence and spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 BRCA1/2 mutations across racial and ethnic groups and discuss implications for clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS The prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations is comparable among breast cancer patients of African, Asian, white, and Hispanic descent: approximately 1-4% per gene. Among ovarian cancer patients in North America, BRCA1/2 mutations are present in 13-15%. Between racial/ethnic groups, there are important differences in the spectrum of BRCA1 compared with BRCA2 mutations, in BRCA1/2 variants of uncertain significance, and in the accuracy of clinical models that predict BRCA1/2 mutation carriage. SUMMARY Given the significant prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations across race/ethnicity, there is a need to expand and customize genetic counseling, genetic testing, and follow-up care for members of all racial/ethnic groups.
Collapse
|
240
|
Klitzman R, Chung W. The process of deciding about prophylactic surgery for breast and ovarian cancer: Patient questions, uncertainties, and communication. Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A:52-66. [PMID: 20014126 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Many, women who have, or are at risk for, BRCA, 1/2 mutations or breast cancer decline prophylactic surgery, but questions remain as to how they make and experience these decisions. Our methods consisted of interviewing 32 women for 2 hr each; 19 were tested, 20 were symptomatic. Our results showed that these surgical options forced women to confront questions, involving stresses and uncertainties, regarding: implications of test results, prognoses with and without surgery, and effects of surgery (e.g., on self-image). Given these dilemmas, many women turned to doctors who then ranged in what and how they communicated about these issues, and how strongly they offered input. Some patients felt disappointed at provider non-directiveness, while others found providers too directive. Patients turned to family members and friends, who also ranged in how and what they communicated, and whether they agreed with the patient and/or each other. Many women turned to patient communities, but then had to decide how involved to be, and what information to provide or accept. These data suggest that providers and others may need to be more aware of the series of questions, involving stresses and uncertainties, that these women face, and the complex roles providers themselves may play. These data highlight needs for physicians to be able to address these issues flexibly, gauging patient preferences for information and paternalism (vs. autonomy). These data suggest areas for future research: for example, on how providers decide whether, what and how to communicate about these issues, and how these choices shape treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Klitzman
- College of Physicians and Surgeons and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, Unit 15, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
241
|
Skytte AB, Gerdes AM, Andersen MK, Sunde L, Brøndum-Nielsen K, Waldstrøm M, Kølvraa S, Crüger D. Risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in unaffected BRCA mutation carriers: uptake and timing. Clin Genet 2010; 77:342-9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01329.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
242
|
Klijn JGM. Early diagnosis of hereditary breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging: what is realistic? J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:1441-5. [PMID: 20177020 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.26.3467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
243
|
Current World Literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 22:87-93. [DOI: 10.1097/gco.0b013e328335462f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
244
|
Antill YC, Mitchell G, Johnson SA, Devereux L, Milner A, Di Iulio J, Lindeman GJ, Kirk J, Phillips KA, Campbell IG. Gene Methylation in Breast Ductal Fluid from BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19:265-74. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
245
|
Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Plevritis SK. Survival analysis of cancer risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2009; 28:222-31. [PMID: 19996031 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.22.7991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with BRCA1/2 mutations inherit high risks of breast and ovarian cancer; options to reduce cancer mortality include prophylactic surgery or breast screening, but their efficacy has never been empirically compared. We used decision analysis to simulate risk-reducing strategies in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and to compare resulting survival probability and causes of death. METHODS We developed a Monte Carlo model of breast screening with annual mammography plus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from ages 25 to 69 years, prophylactic mastectomy (PM) at various ages, and/or prophylactic oophorectomy (PO) at ages 40 or 50 years in 25-year-old BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. RESULTS With no intervention, survival probability by age 70 is 53% for BRCA1 and 71% for BRCA2 mutation carriers. The most effective single intervention for BRCA1 mutation carriers is PO at age 40, yielding a 15% absolute survival gain; for BRCA2 mutation carriers, the most effective single intervention is PM, yielding a 7% survival gain if performed at age 40 years. The combination of PM and PO at age 40 improves survival more than any single intervention, yielding 24% survival gain for BRCA1 and 11% for BRCA2 mutation carriers. PM at age 25 instead of age 40 offers minimal incremental benefit (1% to 2%); substituting screening for PM yields a similarly minimal decrement in survival (2% to 3%). CONCLUSION Although PM at age 25 plus PO at age 40 years maximizes survival probability, substituting mammography plus MRI screening for PM seems to offer comparable survival. These results may guide women with BRCA1/2 mutations in their choices between prophylactic surgery and breast screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison W Kurian
- Departments of Medicine, Health Research and Policy, and Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
246
|
|
247
|
Evans DGR, Lalloo F, Ashcroft L, Shenton A, Clancy T, Baildam AD, Brain A, Hopwood P, Howell A. Uptake of risk-reducing surgery in unaffected women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer is risk, age, and time dependent. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009; 18:2318-24. [PMID: 19661091 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The uptake of risk-reducing surgery in women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer is highly variable between countries and centers within countries. We have investigated the rate, timing, and age of uptake of surgery in the northwest of England to report the results after up to 7 years in a Regional Genetics center. METHODS Uptake was documented in 211 known unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers from 509 families and in 3,515 women at >25% lifetime risk of breast cancer without known mutations. RESULTS Of the 211 mutation carriers, 40% opted for bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) and 45% underwent bilateral risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (BRRSPO). Uptake of BRRM was significantly related to lifetime risk and age but continued over several years. In women not known to carry a BRCA mutation, 6.4% of women at 40% to 45% lifetime risk, 2.5% of women at 33% to 39% lifetime risk, and 1.8% of women at 25% to 32% lifetime risk underwent BRRM (P < 0.005). BRRSPO uptake was greater in BRCA1 (52%) than BRCA2 (28%) carriers but in both groups tended to occur within the first 2 years after gene test (except in the youngest age group) and in women between the ages of 35 and 45. CONCLUSION To truly assess the uptake of risk-reducing surgery, longer-term follow-up is necessary particularly in younger women who are likely to delay BRRSPO. Careful risk counseling does seem to influence women's decisions for surgery, although the effect is not immediate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Gareth R Evans
- Regional Genetic Service, The University of Manchester, St.Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
248
|
Kwon JS, Daniels MS, Sun CC, Lu KH. Preventing future cancers by testing women with ovarian cancer for BRCA mutations. J Clin Oncol 2009; 28:675-82. [PMID: 19841329 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.21.4684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with ovarian cancer have a 10% probability of carrying a BRCA mutation. If a mutation is identified, unaffected family members can undergo genetic testing and cancer risk-reducing strategies. We estimated the net health benefits and cost-effectiveness of different criteria for BRCA mutation testing in women with ovarian cancer, and the downstream benefits for their first-degree relatives (FDRs). METHODS We developed a Markov Monte Carlo simulation model to compare four criteria for BRCA testing in women with ovarian cancer: no testing (reference); only if personal history of breast cancer, family history of breast/ovarian cancer, or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry; only if invasive serous cancer; any invasive nonmucinous epithelial cancer. Net health benefit was life expectancy for FDRs and primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The model estimated the number of future breast and ovarian cancer cases in FDRs. RESULTS BRCA testing based on personal/family history and ancestry could prevent future cases in FDRs with an ICER of $32,018 per year of life (LY) gained compared with the reference strategy. BRCA testing based on serous or any nonmucinous epithelial ovarian cancer could prevent more cancer cases, but at ICERs of $128,465 and $148,363 per LY gained, respectively. CONCLUSION BRCA testing of women with ovarian cancer based on personal/family history of cancer or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry is a cost-effective strategy to prevent future breast and ovarian cancers among FDRs. More inclusive testing strategies prevent additional cancer cases but at significant cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice S Kwon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
249
|
Howard AF, Balneaves LG, Bottorff JL. Women's decision making about risk-reducing strategies in the context of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review. J Genet Couns 2009; 18:578-97. [PMID: 19802692 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9245-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2009] [Accepted: 07/09/2009] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Women who have a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have up to an 87% lifetime risk of breast cancer and up to a 40% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer prevention and early detection strategies are often considered by these women to address this heightened risk. Risk-reducing strategies include risk-reducing mastectomy and oophorectomy, breast and ovarian cancer screening, and chemoprevention. This systematic literature review summarizes the factors and contexts that influence decision making related to cancer risk-reducing strategies among women at high-risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. In the 43 published research articles reviewed, three main types of factors are identified that influence high-risk women's decisions about risk-reducing strategies: a) medical and physical factors, b) psychological factors and c) social context factors. How these factors operate in women's lives over time remains unknown, and would best be elucidated through prospective, longitudinal research, as well as qualitative research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fuchsia Howard
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, 302-6190 Agronomy Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
250
|
Stefanek ME, Andrykowski MA, Lerman C, Manne S, Glanz K. Behavioral Oncology and the War on Cancer: Partnering with Biomedicine. Cancer Res 2009; 69:7151-6. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-4005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|