Heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis: rates, predictors, and the effect of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy

Activation of immune and inflammatory systems in chronic heart failure: novel therapeutic approaches

Despite extensive research and novel treatments, chronic heart failure (CHF) remains a cause of high morbidity and mortality. Mounting evidence suggested that immune activation and inflammation play critical roles in the pathogenesis of CHF. In this review, we examine the current evidence regarding this contemporary pathophysiological mechanism, and evaluate the effects of conventional and novel cardiovascular drugs, such as calcium sensitisers and statins, on the immune and inflammatory mediator's network. Although therapies, which specifically antagonise tumour necrosis factor-alpha have not demonstrated considerable benefit in patients with CHF, there is an increasing evidence to suggest greater value from non-specific anti-inflammatory approaches, including: pentoxifylline, intravenous immunoglobulin, immune modulation therapy, growth hormones, physical training and nutrition regulation. Several innovative therapeutic targets, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activators, Rho-kinase, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, nuclear transcription factor NF-kappaB, recovering or augmenting parasympathetic tone, cardiac resynchronisation therapy, macrophage inhibitors and chemokine receptor antagonists, are briefly discussed in this review. While we have recently demonstrated the potential merits of combining low-dose methotrexate with conventional therapy, through extensively modulating the activated immune and inflammatory mediator's network, there is a need for further rigorous research of this complex network, especially involving current promising therapies which modulate this system. Such evidence has the potential to revolutionise changes for the management of this disorder. Based on the 'heterogeneity' of immune activation and inflammation among different CHF populations, an 'optimised combination treatment' may offer exciting benefits for individual therapy in the future.

Potential Complications Associated with the Use of Biologic Agents for Psoriasis

The biologic agents are effective drugs to treat psoriasis. They provide physicians with additional options for patients who cannot tolerate traditional therapies or for whom traditional therapies are not sufficient. While these new TNF-alpha inhibitors and anti-T-cell agents have potential complications, they are generally safe with proper monitoring. Both physicians and patients should be aware of the risks involved with each medicine so that the correct drug is chosen to suit each patient.

Endothelial progenitor cells in active rheumatoid arthritis: effects of tumour necrosis factor and glucocorticoid therapy

OBJECTIVES

To study the effects of short-term intermediate dose glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), which are known to influence cardiovascular risk, and to elucidate mechanisms potentially responsible for the reduction of EPCs in patients with active RA.

METHODS

EPCs were quantified in 29 patients with active RA by flow cytometry, colony forming unit (CFU) and circulating angiogenic cell (CAC) assays before and after 7 days of intermediate dose GC therapy. CFU from patients with RA and from healthy referents (HR) were cultured in vitro in the absence or presence of dexamethasone (Dex) and/or TNF.

RESULTS

After 1 week of GC therapy, EPC increased from 0.026 (SD 0.003)% to 0.053 (SD 0.010)% (p<0.01), and from 12 (SD 4) to 27 (SD 7) CFU/well (p<0.02); CAC also increased from 7 (SD 2) to 29 (SD 8) cells/high power field (p<0.05). In parallel, disease activity decreased significantly after GC treatment. TNF serum levels also decreased from 36 (SD 10) to 14 (SD 6) pg/ml (p<0.0001). Addition of Dex to the RA CFU led to a significant increase of mean CFU counts, whereas addition of TNF induced a decrease of CFU.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that TNF may be at least partly responsible for the reduction of EPC seen in patients with RA. Intermediate doses of GCs for a short period of time, apart from reducing disease activity, significantly increase circulating EPC.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Atherosclerosis in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the extent of subclinical atherosclerosis by measuring the intima-media wall thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to identify vascular risk factors associated with PsA.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with PsA were compared with 100 allegedly healthy subjects. Carotid duplex scanning was used to measure common carotid artery IMT. Traditional risk factors, such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, smoking, and lipids were checked. Assessment of PsA activity included clinical patterns of involvement, degree of severity, duration of morning stiffness, number of tender and swollen joints, degree of pain and fatigue, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen.

RESULTS

The average IMT (mean +/- standard deviation) for PsA patients was significantly higher compared with controls (0.76 +/- 0.11 versus 0.64 +/- 0.27, respectively, P < 0.00001) for the whole group and after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The PsA subjects had significantly higher levels of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, ESR, CRP, and fibrinogen, and their average IMT significantly correlated with age, BMI, duration of skin and joint disease, spine involvement, ESR, and fibrinogen. IMT did not correlate with the presence of oligo- or polyarthritis but was increased in patients with clinical spinal involvement. IMT was not associated with the degree of severity or the use of different therapies for PsA, including methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor-alpha-blocking agents.

CONCLUSIONS

PsA patients exhibited greater IMT than healthy controls. Increased IMT independently correlated with parameters of disease activity and conventional risk factors of atherosclerosis.

Problems encountered during anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy

Worldwide, over 400,000 patients have been treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists for indications that include rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Since their approval, concerns regarding safety have been raised. There is a risk of re-activation of granulomatous diseases, especially tuberculosis, and measures should be taken for detection and treatment of latent tuberculosis infections. Preliminary data suggest that anti-TNF therapy may be safe in chronic hepatitis C. However, TNF-alpha antagonists have resulted in re-activation of chronic hepatitis B if not given concurrently with antiviral therapy. Solid tumours do not appear to be increased with anti-TNF therapy. Variable rates of increased lymphoma risk have been described with anti-TNF therapy compared with the general population, although no increased risk was found compared with a rheumatoid arthritis population. Large phase II and III trials with TNF-alpha antagonists in advanced heart failure have shown trends towards a worse prognosis, and should therefore be avoided in this population. Both etanercept and infliximab are associated with the formation of autoantibodies, and these autoantibodies are rarely associated with any specific clinical syndrome. Rare cases of aplastic anaemia, pancytopenia, vasculitis and demyelination have been described with anti-TNF therapy. This chapter will discuss the safety profile and adverse events of the three commercially available TNF-alpha antagonists: etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab. The data presented in this review have been collected from published data, individual case reports or series, package inserts, the Food and Drug Administration postmarketing adverse events surveillance system, and abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology and European Congress of Rheumatology meetings for 2005.

Biologic therapies in rheumatology: lessons learned, future directions

During the past decade biologic therapies such as monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins have revolutionized the management of rheumatic disease. By targeting key cytokines and immune cells biologics have provided more specific therapeutic interventions with less immunosuppression. Clinical use, however, has revealed that their theoretical simplicity hides a more complex reality. Efficacy, toxicity and even pharmacodynamic effects can deviate from those predicted, as poignantly illustrated by the catastrophic effects witnessed during the first-into-human administration of TGN1412. This review summarizes lessons gleaned from practical experience and discusses how these can inform future discovery and development of new biologic therapies for rheumatology.

Resistance of rheumatoid arthritis patients to changing therapy: Discordance between disease activity and patients' treatment choices

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, patients' decisions regarding therapy often deviate from expert recommendation. This study was undertaken to investigate patients' acceptance and satisfaction with therapy, willingness to change therapy, and reasons for not changing.

METHODS

Participants (n = 6,135) completed an 11-item questionnaire concerning treatment preferences. Eight questions assessed reasons for not wanting to change therapy. The contribution of individual predictors was determined by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Questionnaire responses showed that 63.8% of the patients would not want to change therapy as long as their condition didn't get worse; 77.3% were satisfied with their medications, while 9.4% were dissatisfied. These assessments were weakly related to RA activity and functional status. Side effects had occurred in 22.4% of the patients during the previous 6 months, and in 65.5% at some period during their lifetime. Predictors of unwillingness to change therapy were satisfaction with RA control, which had an odds ratio (OR) of 6.8 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 5.8-8.0), risk of side effects (OR 4.4 [95% CI 3.8-5.2]), physician opinion (OR 1.9 [95% CI 1.6-2.2]), fear of loss of control (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.6-2.1]), lack of better medications (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2-1.6]), and costs (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1-1.6]). There was little difference in results between patients who were receiving biologic agents and those who were not.

CONCLUSION

There is substantial discrepancy between declared satisfaction with therapy and measured RA activity and functional status. Most RA patients are satisfied with their therapy, even many with abnormal scores. Fear of loss of control of RA and fear of side effects are major patient concerns. Maintenance of current status, rather than future improvement, appears to be a high priority for patients.

Biologic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of malignancy: Analyses from a large US observational study

OBJECTIVE

Induction of malignancy is a major concern when rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is treated with biologic therapy. A meta-analysis of RA biologic clinical trials found a general increased risk of malignancy, but this risk was not found in a large observational study. We undertook this study to assess the risk of malignancy among biologic-treated patients in a large US observational database.

METHODS

We studied incident cases of cancer among 13,001 patients during approximately 49,000 patient-years of observation in the years 1998-2005. Cancer rates were compared with population rates using the US National Cancer Institute SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results) database. Assessment of the risk of biologic therapy utilized conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) as estimates of the relative risk, further adjusted for 6 confounders: age, sex, education level, smoking history, RA severity, and prednisone use.

RESULTS

Biologic exposure was 49%. There were 623 incident cases of nonmelanotic skin cancer and 537 other cancers. The standardized incidence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) compared with SEER data were as follows: all cancers 1.0 (1.0-1.1), breast 0.8 (0.6-0.9), colon 0.5 (0.4-0.6), lung 1.2 (1.0-1.4), lymphoma 1.7 (1.3-2.2). Biologics were associated with an increased risk of nonmelanotic skin cancer (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8) and melanoma (OR 2.3, 95% CI 0.9-5.4). No other malignancy was associated with biologic use; the OR (overall risk) of any cancer was 1.0 (95% CI 0.8-1.2).

CONCLUSION

Biologic therapy is associated with increased risk for skin cancers, but not for solid tumors or lymphoproliferative malignancies. These associations were consistent across different biologic therapies.

The role of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy in Pyoderma gangrenosum associated with inflammatory bowel disease

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an ulcerative neutrophilic dermatosis seen in 1-5% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The pathogenesis of PG remains unclear, but may be related to abnormal T-cell responses and production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, a powerful proinflammatory cytokine. Although their use is not supported by appropriately controlled trials, corticosteroids and systemic immunosuppressants are the classical cornerstones of treatment of PG, against which they have a nonspecific effect. Successful curative or symptomatic treatment of associated disorders may lead to an improvement in PG. A new era for the management of chronic inflammatory disease began with the advent of biotherapies and particularly anti-TNFalpha therapy, which allows for a specific intervention in the immune cascade. Anti-TNFalpha therapy has improved and broadened the therapeutic options for IBD and, therefore, has brought new perspectives to management of the extra-intestinal manifestations of this disorder, including PG. To date, infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab have been used in the treatment of PG. Published data have demonstrated that infliximab is highly effective in the treatment of PG, whether associated with IBD or not. This treatment is generally well tolerated, even as long-term therapy. However, rare and serious complications have been reported. Although infliximab is a costly drug, its use should be considered for patients with PG and particularly with corticosteroid-refractory PG associated with IBD. Additional comparative long-term studies are needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of anti-TNFalpha therapy and define its role in the management of PG, with or without accompanying IBD.

Safety of infliximab and other biologic agents in the inflammatory bowel diseases

In many ways, infliximab has drastically altered expectations for medical therapy in IBD, and it is expected that adalimumab and certolizumab pegol with ultimately have a similar role. Patients initiating such therapy should be made cognizant of the potential risks of serious infection including opportunistic ones, such as TB and histoplasmosis; demyelinating disorders; CHF; and lymphoma. Proper selection of candidates for anti-TNF-alpha therapy is critical in maintaining a proper benefit-to-risk ratio.

The incidence of new onset congestive heart failure and heart failure exacerbation in Veteran’s Affairs patients receiving tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of new onset or worsening congestive heart failure in Veteran's Affairs (VA) patients who have received infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab, and to compare mortality rates in these patients to control populations. We enrolled three groups of patients for this retrospective study: TNF-alpha group (n = 103), a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) control group (n = 100), and a control group without RA (n = 100). All patients at our VA facility who had received at least one dose of the TNF-alpha antagonists were included in the TNF-alpha group. Admissions for CHF did not differ between the three groups: TNF-alpha 7 (6.7%), RA control 8 (8%), non-RA control 7 (7%); P = 0.940. Mortality rates were not significantly different: TNF-alpha 4 (3.8%), RA control 7 (7%), non-RA control 11 (11%); P = 0.147. Our study showed no difference between the three groups in either CHF exacerbation or mortality.

A severe case of chronic infantile neurologic, cutaneous, articular syndrome treated with biologic agents

In this report we describe a case of severe chronic infantile neurologic, cutaneous, articular (CINCA) syndrome with a novel G307V cryopyrin mutation and all of the characteristic clinical and laboratory features of this autoinflammatory disease. There was no clear response to standard therapies, including human interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist (anakinra) and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (etanercept). The patient finally had a partial clinical response (reduction in fever and irritability) and complete laboratory response (improved C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A levels) to humanized anti-IL-6 receptor antibody (MRA), but died from congestive heart failure and interstitial pneumonia 2 months after initiation of therapy. We serially measured the serum cytokine levels and expression of NF-kappaB activation in the patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells before and during consecutive therapies. Pathologic examination of autopsy specimens was also performed. This case illustrates the continued difficulty in management of patients with CINCA syndrome and the complexity of the inflammatory pathways in this disorder.

Fréquence des facteurs de risque et co-morbidités cardiovasculaires chez les patients atteints de maladie rhumatismale

Analysis of national data from the health ministry programme of reduction of the cardiovascular risks (2002-2005) shows a high frequency of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors in the general population. It is of interest to analyse these data in relation to the practice of rheumatology. In addition, the frequency of cardiovascular pathologies is higher in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthropathy. These notions are also very important since these two populations are often treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for a long duration. General knowledge shown in this article concerning the cardiovascular risk factors and co-morbidities in the patients with rheumatic pathologies allows, within the context of a therapeutic decisional strategy in rheumatology, a better estimation of the individual benefit/risk ratio of each prescription and more particularly that of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

InforMatrix: treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using biologicals

This article offers an interactive decision matrix technique (InforMatrix), in which a group of experts in rheumatology determine an order of merit within the various biologicals used for rheumatoid arthritis. In this order of merit, six criteria (efficacy, safety, tolerance, ease of use, applicability and costs) are weighed against each other. Data necessary for this weighing process are derived from both literature, as well as clinical practice experience. This article provides an overview of the most relevant clinical trials on the biologicals, as well as a description of the interactive decision matrix technique. Using this interactive matrix technique makes rational consideration of the treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis possible.

Cardiovascular risk and rheumatoid arthritis: clinical practice guidelines based on published evidence and expert opinion

OBJECTIVE

To develop clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation and management of cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using the evidence-based approach and expert opinion.

METHODS

Recommendations were developed using the evidence-based approach and expert opinion: A scientific committee used a Delphi procedure to select five questions, which formed the basis for developing the recommendations; Evidence providing answers to the five questions was sought in the literature; Based on this evidence, recommendations were developed by a panel of experts.

RESULTS

The recommendations were as follows: 1) In patients with RA, attention should be given to the risk of cardiovascular disease, which is responsible for an excess burden of morbidity and mortality; 2) It must be recognized that RA may be an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Persistent inflammation is an additional risk factor; 3) The cardiovascular risk should be evaluated, and modifiable risk factors should be corrected; 4) In patients with RA requiring glucocorticoid therapy, the need for cardiovascular risk minimization is among the reasons that mandate the use of the minimal effective dose; 5) It should be recognized that methotrexate may protect against cardiovascular mortality in patients with RA; 6) It should be recognized that TNFalpha antagonists remain contraindicated in patients with RA and severe heart failure. TNFalpha antagonists do not seem to worsen moderate heart failure and may protect against cardiovascular mortality; 7) AFSSAPS recommendations about LDL-cholesterol objectives should be followed, with active RA being counted as a cardiovascular risk factor; 8) In patients with RA, statin therapy should be considered only when cholesterol levels are elevated despite appropriate dietary treatment; 9) RA per se does not indicate aspirin for primary prevention. When aspirin is used for secondary prevention, it should be recognized that concomitant treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may decrease the antiplatelet effects and increase the gastrointestinal side effects of aspirin therapy.

Rheumatoid arthritis and the heart

The risk of cardiovascular disease is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in patients with RA is largely unknown, evidence to date indicates that it involves complex interactions between the traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors as well as various medications commonly used for the treatment of RA patients. This review provides an overview of the clinical studies that demonstrate increased risk of coronary heart disease and heart failure in patients with RA and also discusses the potential role of the various risk factors.

Treatment of psoriatic arthritis with etanercept, a tumour necrosis factor antagonist

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic spondylarthritis that occurs in approximately 23% of plaque psoriasis sufferers. Traditional treatments for rheumatoid arthritis have been used as the first therapeutic approach to treat this inflammatory disease, which has both joint and skin manifestations. However, due to the inefficiency of current disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in stopping the progression of the joint disease, biologics have emerged as a hopeful alternative to PsA therapy. Etanercept was the first approved tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitor for reducing the signs and symptoms of PsA, as well as preventing the progression of the disease. Etanercept is a fully human, soluble, dimeric fusion protein that has the ability to bind to two molecules of TNF, thereby rendering them biologically inactive. Two clinical trials have demonstrated that etanercept is generally a safe, efficacious and well-tolerated biologic therapy for the treatment of PsA.

Is there a role for TNF-alpha in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis? Lessons from other chronic inflammatory diseases

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis is the most common cause of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and immune-mediated pulmonary renal syndrome. Now that the acute manifestations of the disease generally can be controlled with immunosuppressive drugs, ANCA-associated vasculitis has become a chronic and relapsing inflammatory disorder. The need to develop safer and more effective treatment has led to great interest in the mediators of chronic inflammation. There are many lessons to be learned from studies of other chronic inflammatory diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The identification of a TNF-alpha-dependent cytokine cascade in the in vitro cultures of synovium in joints of patients with RA led to studies of TNF blockade in experimental models of arthritis and subsequently to clinical trials. These have culminated in the widespread introduction of anti-TNF therapy not only in RA but also in Crohn disease, ankylosing spondylitis, and several other chronic inflammatory disorders. Following a similar investigative pathway, studies that show the importance of TNF production by leukocytes and intrinsic renal cells in glomerulonephritis have been followed by the demonstration of the effectiveness of TNF blockade in several experimental models of glomerulonephritis and vasculitis. In experimental autoimmune vasculitis, improvement in disease was paralleled by a reduction in leukocyte transmigration, as demonstrated by intravital microscopy. The benefit of infliximab (a mAb to TNF) in ANCA-associated vasculitis was recently reported in a prospective open-label study. However, the use of etanercept (a soluble TNF receptor fusion protein) was not found to be of significant benefit in a randomized, controlled trial in patients with Wegener granulomatosis. Therefore, there is a need for further evaluation of the use of anti-TNF antibodies in patients with ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis.

Infliximab for the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic, chronic inflammatory disease characterised predominately by polyarthritis with frequent progression to permanent joint damage and disability. Evidence shows that starting treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy early in the course of disease can slow radiographic progression of RA compared with a more delayed approach. Moreover, in the early stages of RA, treatment with a combination of methotrexate (MTX), a traditional DMARD, and a biologic with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha blocking activity has proven to be more effective than using MTX alone. Among the approved TNF-alpha inhibitors, infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody with high affinity and specificity for its target cytokine. It binds to soluble TNF monomers and trimers, as well as membrane-bound TNF-alpha, forming a stable complex which prevents TNF-alpha from binding to its receptor and triggering a biological response. The combination of MTX and infliximab therapy has shown superior clinical outcomes compared with MTX monotherapy in early RA, as well as greater protection against joint damage and physical disability. Although infliximab therapy has been associated with side effects, including serious infections, this drug can be administered with an acceptable margin of safety for several years by appropriate selection of patients, screening for latent and active tuberculosis, and monitoring of patients for infection and other toxicities. The knowledge of the benefits of infliximab therapy for early RA affords groundwork for developing more effective treatment strategies that can minimise disease progression over the long term.

Infliximab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) had previously been considered as a chronic disease with little therapeutic options. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and regular physiotherapy were the only treatment modalities available for patients with AS. The introduction of biologics into clinical practice has substantially broadened the therapeutic armamentarium in AS patients who are refractory to NSAIDs. Remicade (infliximab; Centocor, Inc., USA), a chimeric monoclonal antibody, targets TNF-alpha, and by inhibition of this proinflammatory cytokine, exerts strong clinical improvement of signs and symptoms of AS. In AS, infliximab 5 mg/kg body weight is usually given as an infusion at weeks 0, 2 and 6, and every 6 - 8 weeks thereafter. An improvement of the disease activity by at least 50% is seen in as many as 50% of AS patients treated with infliximab in addition to NSAIDs. Back pain and also peripheral manifestations, such as enthesitic sites and arthritis, improve, and quality of life significantly increases. In addition, elevated acute phase reactants return to normal or low levels, and active inflammatory lesions of the spine as detected by magnetic resonance imaging substantially regress during treatment with infliximab. Clinical improvement occurs during the first 2 weeks of treatment and the clinical response to infliximab, if given continuously, is sustained and long-lasting as follow-up data of ongoing studies show. The short-term benefit/risk ratio of infliximab is clearly in favour of the drug, and it is estimated that at present up to 30% of patients with active AS are in need of this kind of effective treatment.

Contribution of congestive heart failure and ischemic heart disease to excess mortality in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Although mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is higher than in the general population, the relative contribution of comorbid diseases to this mortality difference is not known. This study was undertaken to evaluate the contribution of congestive heart failure (CHF) and ischemic heart disease (IHD), including myocardial infarction, to the excess mortality in patients with RA, compared with that in individuals without RA.

METHODS

We assembled a population-based inception cohort of individuals living in Rochester, Minnesota, in whom RA (defined according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology [formerly, the American Rheumatism Association]) first developed between 1955 and 1995, and an age- and sex-matched non-RA cohort. All subjects were followed up until either death, migration from the county, or until 2001. Detailed information from the complete medical records was collected. Statistical analyses included the person-years method, cumulative incidence, and Cox regression modeling. Attributable risk analysis techniques were used to estimate the number of RA deaths that would be prevented if the incidence of CHF was the same in patients with RA and non-RA subjects.

RESULTS

The study population included 603 patients with RA and 603 subjects without RA. During followup, there was an excess of 123 deaths among patients with RA (345 RA deaths occurred, although only 222 such deaths were expected). The mortality rates among patients with RA and non-RA subjects were 39.0 and 29.2 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. There was a significantly higher cumulative incidence of CHF (but not IHD) in patients with RA compared with non-RA subjects (37.1% versus 27.7% at 30 years of followup, respectively; P < 0.001). The risk of death associated with either CHF or IHD was not significantly different between patients with RA and non-RA subjects. If the risk of developing CHF was the same in patients with RA and individuals without RA, the overall mortality rate difference between RA and non-RA hypothetically would be reduced from 9.8 to 8.0 excess deaths per 1,000 person-years; that is, 16 (13%) of the 123 excess deaths could be prevented.

CONCLUSION

CHF, rather than IHD, appears to be an important contributor to the excess overall mortality among patients with RA. CHF contributes to this excess mortality primarily through the increased incidence of CHF in RA, rather than increased mortality associated with CHF in patients with RA compared with non-RA subjects. Eliminating the excess risk of CHF in patients with RA could significantly improve their survival.

[A case of recurrent breast cancer with life-threatening multiple lung metastasis markedly responding to CMF as third-line chemotherapy]

A 35-year-old woman with taxane and anthracycline-resistant recurrent breast cancer with multiple lung metastasis and carcinomatous lymphangitis was treated with CMF as third-line chemotherapy. A complete response was achieved,and the toxicities were tolerable. We thought that CMF could be a useful regimen as third-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Disease

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to ascertain whether left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is more common among clinic patients with rheumatoid disease (RD) compared with the general population, and to assess the diagnostic utility of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP).

BACKGROUND

Patients with RD are at increased risk of ischemic heart disease. However, there are few large echocardiographic studies identifying cardiac dysfunction in RD. We hypothesized that LVSD would be more prevalent in RD patients than in the general population.

METHODS

A total of 226 hospital out-patients with RD (65% women) underwent clinical evaluation, electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, and plasma BNP assay (218 patients). Prevalence of LVSD was compared with local population estimates.

RESULTS

Definite LVSD (left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) occurred in 5.3% of the RD group: standardized prevalence ratio, 3.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.65 to 5.59. Median BNP values were higher in patients with LVSD compared with those without: 16.6 pmol/l versus 8.5 pmol/l, p < 0.005, although values between the two groups overlapped. One in nine patients with an abnormal ECG had definite LVSD.

CONCLUSIONS

Definite LVSD was three times more common in RD patients than in the general population. Given the prognostic benefits of treating LVSD, echocardiographic screening of RD patients with an abnormal ECG may be worthwhile.

Adalimumab: a review of side effects

Adalimumab (Humira) is a human monoclonal TNF-alpha antibody that blocks the effects of TNF-alpha. It is administered by subcutaneous injection. It has been approved alone or in combination with methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the EU and US. Approval for its use for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis is expected in the near future. Its side effect profile is favourable when compared with traditional systemic treatments for these diseases. It does not require laboratory monitoring. The most common side effects of adalimumab are injection site reactions. Adalimumab increases the risk of rare serious infections. There is a two-fold risk of serious infections with the use of adalimumab, as reported in the Premier trial. This risk should not be minimised in this way. It should not be used during periods of active infection. Its most notable infectious complication is the reactivation of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis screening should be according to country standards and may or may not include purified protein derivative test or chest X-ray. Deep fungal and other serious and atypical infection can also be promoted by adalimumab. It has been associated infrequently with skin rashes. Rare side effects include: worsening or initiation of congestive heart failure, a lupus-like syndrome, a promotion of lymphoma, medically significant cytopenias, and worsening or initiation of a multiple sclerosis/neurological disease. There has been reported pancytopenia and elevated transamines with the use of adalimumab, which suggest that laboratory monitoring blood counts and liver functions, at least intermittently, are useful. In patients with any of the foregoing problems, its use should be extremely carefully considered. Adalimumab is a useful medication which can be safely used if its side effects are recognised.

Infliximab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by symmetric inflammation of synovial joints, leading to progressive erosion of cartilage and bone. Tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists have set a new therapeutic standard for rheumatoid arthritis. Tumor necrosis factor-α blocking agents, including infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, have demonstrated substantial improvement in signs and symptoms, disability and quality of life, while significantly inhibiting joint damage in early and long-standing rheumatoid arthritis. The focus of this article will be the role of infliximab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Safety analyses of adalimumab (HUMIRA) in global clinical trials and US postmarketing surveillance of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of adalimumab in global clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Safety data for adalimumab treated patients from randomised controlled trials, open label extensions, and two phase IIIb open label trials were analysed. In addition, postmarketing spontaneous reports of adverse events in the United States were collected following Food and Drug Administration approval of adalimumab on 31 December 2002.

RESULTS

As of 15 April 2005, the RA clinical trial safety database analysed covered 10,050 patients, representing 12,506 patient-years (PYs) of adalimumab exposure. The rate of serious infections, 5.1/100 PYs, was comparable to that reported on 31 August 2002 (4.9/100 PYs), and to published reports of RA populations naive to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Following implementation of tuberculosis (TB) screening in clinical trials, the rate of TB decreased. There were 34 cases of TB as of this analysis (0.27/100 PYs). The standardised incidence ratio for lymphoma was 3.19 (95% CI 1.78 to 5.26), consistent with the observed increased incidence in the general RA population. As of 30 June 2005, there were an estimated 78 522 PYs of exposure to adalimumab in the US postmarketing period. Seventeen TB cases were spontaneously reported (0.02/100 PYs) from the US. Rates of other postmarketing events of interest, such as congestive heart failure, systemic lupus erythematosus, opportunistic infections, blood dyscrasias, lymphomas, and demyelinating disease, support observations from clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

Analyses of these data demonstrate that long term adalimumab treatment is generally safe and well tolerated in patients with RA.

Anti-TNF-α agents in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a potentially debilitating disease that may affect small and large peripheral joints, entheses and the axial skeleton. The different clinical manifestations of PsA have been accounted for by various proposals of subdividing the patients into different subgroups. According to the predominant clinical symptoms, most patients can be classified as belonging to the spectrum of spondyloarthritides (SpA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The conventional therapeutic approach comprises non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic and intra-articular corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as sulfasalazine, methotrexate, ciclosporin and leflunomide. Similar to RA, recent trials in PsA have shown excellent results with the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockers etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab, which have positive effects not only on joints, but also on the skin when affected by psoriasis, quality of life, function and slowing of disease progress, as evidenced radiologically. Anti-TNF therapy has been generally safe in clinical trials of PsA. Taken together, there has been definite recent progress in the treatment of PsA, especially for severely affected patients.

Biological treatment in rheumatic diseases: results from a longitudinal surveillance: adverse events

The objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of biologicals in a clinical setting. Data on adverse events (AEs) have been collected over a 5-year period by means of detailed reports sent in to the National Register of Biological Treatment in Finland (ROB-FIN) and validated by information collected by the National Agency for Medicines. Three hundred and eight reports on AEs were filed, concerning a total of 248 patients; this corresponds to 17% of all patients in the ROB-FIN register who started biological treatments. Skin reactions and infections comprised 35 and 28% of the AEs, respectively. Some cases of tuberculosis and other infections, heart failure and demyelinating conditions were seen. Our work demonstrates no unexpected AEs in a Finnish patient cohort consisting of rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthropathy patients, although many of them were treated with combination treatments in common use in Finland. Biological treatment appears safe in the hands of the Finnish rheumatologists.

The nonspecific anti-inflammatory therapy with methotrexate for patients with chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory mediators play an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic heart failure (CHF). Methotrexate (MTX) is used in the treatment of inflammatory-mediated diseases (eg, rheumatoid arthritis) because it modulates the expression of numerous inflammatory cytokines. However, no studies have assessed the effects of MTX on plasma levels of inflammatory mediators in patients with CHF.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind study, 71 patients receiving conventional treatment were randomly allocated to either MTX group (7.5 mg once a week, n = 35) or placebo group (n = 36) with a follow-up of 12 weeks. The effects of MTX on plasma cytokine expression, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, 6-minute walk test distance, and quality of life (QOL) were determined in patients with CHF.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients completed the study. The circulating levels of inflammatory mediators in patients with CHF were markedly elevated compared with healthy controls (P < or = .002). Methotrexate (n = 30) reduced plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (-15.6%, P < .05), interleukin 6 (-21.8%, P < .01), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (-22.6%, P < .01), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (-19.2%, P < .05), and C-reactive protein (-27.2%, P < .01) compared with baseline. Furthermore, interleukin 10 (15.8 %, P < .05) and soluble IL-1 receptor antagonist (36.1%, P < .01) expression was increased, whereas improvements in NYHA classification, 6-minute walk test distance, and QOL were found compared with baseline. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression was lower and soluble IL-1 receptor antagonist expression higher in the MTX than placebo group (n = 32). Furthermore, the left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, and incidence of main adverse cardiac events between the 2 groups were similar.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the addition of MTX to conventional therapy for CHF has significant anti-inflammatory effects and improves NYHA functional class, 6-minute walk test distance, and QOL.

Cardiovascular involvement in rheumatoid arthritis

Cardiovascular (CV) disease morbidity and mortality are increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and much of the excess CV disease morbidity appears to be due to atherosclerosis. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis (ATS) in RA is complex and there is increasing evidence that many factors including novel and traditional cardiovascular risk factors, RA treatments and the RA inflammatory disease process are involved in the development of CV disease in these patients. Of particular interest are the effects of chronic inflammation and immune dysregulation associated with RA. These have been shown to be associated with endothelial dysfunction, which is an early, potentially reversible, functional abnormality of the arterial wall. However, as several CV disease risk factors and drug prescribing are also influenced by RA disease severity it is very difficult to separate out the effects of the inflammatory disease burden on the cardiovascular system in RA.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, biologic agents and cardiovascular risk

The increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients may depend on traditional risk factors but may also be attributable to RA-specific risk factors such as disease-related dyslipidemia, or cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). TNF-alpha is a proinflammatory cytokine that can produce widespread deleterious effects when expressed in large amounts. It is produced in the heart by both cardiac myocytes and resident macrophages under conditions of cardiac stress, and is thought to be responsible for many of the untoward manifestations of cardiac disease. TNF-alpha may play a role in the triggering and perpetuation of atherosclerosis. Treatment with biologic agents directed against TNF-alpha has significant clinical benefits in inflammatory diseases such as RA and may be able to reduce cardiovascular risk. The disappointing results of the recent studies to antagonize TNF-alpha in CVD may have various explanations. However, the effects of TNF-alpha blockers on incident cases of congestive heart failure (CHF) in RA remains controversial. Due to the lack of evidence of a beneficial effect of anti-TNF-alpha agents in treatment of CHF, they should not be used to treat patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure.

How much of the increased incidence of heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis is attributable to traditional cardiovascular risk factors and ischemic heart disease?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the proportion of the risk for the development of heart failure (HF) that is attributable to traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, ischemic heart disease (IHD), and alcohol abuse between subjects with and subjects without rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A population-based inception cohort of RA patients was assembled along with a similar cohort of subjects without RA. All individuals were followed up through their complete medical records, until HF incidence, death, migration, or January 1, 2001. The attributable risk of HF was estimated as the difference between the observed cumulative incidence of HF in each cohort (estimated from multivariable Cox models and adjusted for the competing risk of death) and the predicted cumulative incidence of HF in the absence of risk factors, with results expressed as a percentage of the observed cumulative incidence.

RESULTS

A total of 575 RA subjects and 583 non-RA subjects (mean age 57 years, 73% women) without HF at incidence/index date had a mean followup of 15.1 and 17.0 years, respectively. During that period, 165 RA and 115 non-RA subjects had a first episode of HF, with a cumulative incidence of 36.3% and 20.4%, respectively, at age 80 years. Among non-RA subjects, 77% of the HF at age 80 years was attributable to CV risk factors, IHD, and alcohol abuse combined, whereas among RA subjects, only 54% of the HF at age 80 years was attributable to these factors (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The excess risk of HF among RA patients is not explained by an increased frequency or effect of CV risk factors and IHD.

Therapy of ankylosing spondylitis. Part II: biological therapies in the spondyloarthritides

Therapeutic options for patients with active and severe spondylarthritis (SpA) have been fairly limited in the past decades. There is now accumulating evidence that biological therapy with agents directed against tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is highly efficacious in the spondyloarthritides, especially in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The TNF blocking agents currently available, infliximab (Remicade), etanercept (Enbrel), and adalimumab (Humira), are approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Europe and the USA. In contrast to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have limited efficacy in SpA. No DMARDs are available for AS patients with active spinal disease. Thus, for AS patients whose condition is not sufficiently controlled with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therapy with TNF blockers may be considered as a first-line treatment. For infliximab, a dose of 3-5 mg/kg seems to be required, and intervals between 6 and 12 weeks are necessary to suppress disease activity continually. The standard dosage of etanercept is 2 x 25 mg subcutaneously (s.c.) per week. There are very few studies with adalimumab (standard dose in RA 20-40 mg s.c. every 1-2 weeks) in SpA. Infliximab and etanercept are now both approved for AS in Europe. There is some evidence that both agents also work in other SpA, especially in PsA. Withdrawal of long-term therapy in AS patients led to relapses of disease after several months. Less radiographic progression after 2 years of continuous treatment with infliximab compared to conventional therapy has been suggested in a small study. Serious adverse events on anti-TNF therapy have remained rare. However, severe infections, including tuberculosis, have been reported. These can be largely prevented by appropriate screening. The benefits of anti-TNF therapy in AS seem to outweigh these shortcomings.

Update of tnf-alpha antagonists and cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) antagonists were unexpectedly found to have no beneficial effects in moderate-to-severe heart failure in two large randomized clinical trials. In certain doses, the agents were found to be harmful. These results have important implications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with the disease have an increased risk for developing cardiovascular co-morbidity, including heart failure. Because of the beneficial effect of the TNF-alpha antagonists in the management of RA, these agents have gained widespread use. Rheumatologists and other physicians who provide care for RA are thus likely to encounter candidates for anti-TNF-alpha therapy who have overt or subclinical heart failure. Although data are currently not sufficient to support evidence-based recommendations, it is possible to make reasonable suggestions to guide clinical practice.

Current evidence for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic literature review for the ASAS/EULAR management recommendations in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

To assess available management strategies in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) using a systematic approach, as a part of the development of evidence based recommendations for the management of AS.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify relevant interventions for the management of AS. Evidence for each intervention was categorised by study type, and outcome data for efficacy, adverse effects, and cost effectiveness were abstracted. The effect size, rate ratio, number needed to treat, and incremental cost effectiveness ratio were calculated for each intervention where possible. Results from randomised controlled trials were pooled where appropriate.

RESULTS

Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions considered to be of interest to clinicians involved in the management of AS were identified. Good evidence (level Ib) exists supporting the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and coxibs for symptomatic treatment. Non-pharmacological treatments are also supported for maintaining function in AS. The use of conventional antirheumatoid arthritis drugs is not well supported by high level research evidence. Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (infliximab and etanercept) have level Ib evidence supporting large treatment effects for spinal pain and function in AS over at least 6 months. Level IV evidence supports surgical interventions in specific patients.

CONCLUSION

This extensive literature review forms the evidence base considered in the development of the new ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of AS.

ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence based recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) as a combined effort of the 'ASsessment in AS' international working group and the European League Against Rheumatism.

METHODS

Each of the 22 participants was asked to contribute up to 15 propositions describing key clinical aspects of AS management. A Delphi process was used to select 10 final propositions. A systematic literature search was then performed to obtain scientific evidence for each proposition. Outcome data for efficacy, adverse effects, and cost effectiveness were abstracted. The effect size, relative risk, number needed to treat, and incremental cost effectiveness ratio were calculated. On the basis of the search results, 10 major recommendations for the management of AS were constructed. The strength of recommendation was assessed based on the strength of the literature evidence, risk-benefit trade-off, and clinical expertise.

RESULTS

The final recommendations considered the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (conventional NSAIDs, coxibs, and co-prescription of gastroprotective agents), disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, treatments with biological agents, simple analgesics, local and systemic steroids, non-pharmacological treatment (including education, exercise, and physiotherapy), and surgical interventions. Three general recommendations were also included. Research evidence (categories I-IV) supported 11 interventions in the treatment of AS. Strength of recommendation varied, depending on the category of evidence and expert opinion.

CONCLUSION

Ten key recommendations for the treatment of AS were developed and assessed using a combination of research based evidence and expert consensus. Regular updating will be carried out to keep abreast of new developments in the management of AS.

Myocardial dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis: epidemiology and pathogenesis

Data from population- and clinic-based epidemiologic studies of rheumatoid arthritis patients suggest that individuals with rheumatoid arthritis are at risk for developing clinically evident congestive heart failure. Many established risk factors for congestive heart failure are over-represented in rheumatoid arthritis and likely account for some of the increased risk observed. In particular, data from animal models of cytokine-induced congestive heart failure have implicated the same inflammatory cytokines produced in abundance by rheumatoid synovium as the driving force behind maladaptive processes in the myocardium leading to congestive heart failure. At present, however, the direct effects of inflammatory cytokines (and rheumatoid arthritis therapies) on the myocardia of rheumatoid arthritis patients are incompletely understood.

Rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disease: the role of systemic inflammation and evolving strategies of prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease are increased in the context of rheumatoid arthritis. The purpose of this review is to examine our evolving understanding of the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis and to underscore the importance of tailored prevention of cardiovascular disease in this select population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent reports have highlighted the shared pathobiology of cardiovascular disease and rheumatoid arthritis, both of which represent inflammatory disorders. Several reports have also provided much-needed insight into the deleterious impact that select therapies (including cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitors) may have in terms of the risk of cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis. Although further study is warranted, preliminary investigations also suggest that aggressive anti-inflammatory therapy, including the adjunctive use of statins, may play important cardioprotective roles in rheumatoid arthritis.

SUMMARY

The pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis is complex and involves several intermediate factors, including dyslipidemia, elevations in serum homocysteine, impaired insulin sensitivity, and endothelial dysfunction. Given the burden of cardiovascular disease in this population, it is important that health care providers caring for rheumatoid arthritis patients adopt a treatment course that is both comprehensive and individualized to address specific risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Current concepts in the therapy of the spondyloarthritides

Recent success in the treatment of patients with the more severe forms of spondyloarthritides (SpA) has dramatically changed old paradigms. There is evidence that anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha therapy is highly effective in SpA, especially in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis. Based on recent data on more than 1000 patients with AS and psoriatic arthritis, this treatment seems to be even more effective than in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The currently available anti-TNFalpha agents, infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab, are approved for the treatment of RA in the US and in Europe. TNFalpha blockers may even be considered as a first-line treatment in patients with active AS whose condition is not sufficiently controlled with NSAIDs, as in the case of axial disease. There is preliminary evidence that both agents also work in other SpA, such as undifferentiated SpA. There is hope that ankylosis may be preventable, but it remains to be shown whether patients benefit from long-term anti-TNFalpha therapy and whether radiologic progression and ankylosis can be stopped. Furthermore, it seems that anti-TNFalpha therapy can also improve clinical manifestations of other inflammatory spinal disorders, such as sciatica and back pain caused by disc herniation, or possibly even intermittent inflammatory states of degenerative disc disease. Severe adverse events from treatment with anti-TNFalpha continue to be rare. Tuberculosis can be largely prevented by appropriate screening. As it stands now, the benefits of anti-TNFalpha therapy in AS seem to outweigh the shortcomings.

Disease modification and cardiovascular risk reduction: two sides of the same coin?

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases are associated with a substantial increase in accelerated atherosclerosis, with complex interactions between traditional and disease-related risk factors. Therefore, cardiovascular risk reduction should be considered as integral to the control of disease activity in the care plans of patients with RA, SLE and, arguably any chronic inflammatory disease. Shared care structures, already established for the monitoring of DMARDs, could be adapted to communicate and monitor cardiovascular risk reduction objectives. We review the evidence for the efficacy of a range of therapeutic strategies, the majority of which impact on both disease activity and cardiovascular risk. The algorithm proposed here attempts to distil the latest advice from specialist panels at the National Cholesterol Education Program and the British Hypertension Society, as well as incorporating the existing data on SLE and RA patients. The algorithm is structured to minimize clinic time and resources necessary to stratify patients into groups for ROUTINE, SUBSTANTIAL or INTENSIVE risk management; the associated table summarizes optimal therapeutic objectives in each of these groups. The implication of this algorithm is that management of cardiovascular risk should be much more aggressive than is currently the norm in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases, such as RA and SLE. Long-term studies of such interventions are needed to further clarify the benefits of intensive cardiovascular risk management in these patients.

Etanercept, anticytokines and mania

Cytokines influence multiple psychiatric and medical conditions. Proinflammatory cytokines are associated with depression. The novel treatment of autoimmune diseases with anticytokines presents a unique strategy to understand the role of cytokines in affective disorders. Specifically, because antidepressants can be associated with cycling into manic states, and antidepressants can be associated with resolution of cytokine-induced depression, then, hypothetically, the treatment of a vulnerable patient who has an affective disorder with an anticytokine could also result in cycling. The development of a manic episode is described in a patient with psoriatic arthritis who was treated with etanercept, a tumour necrosis factor-alpha antagonist.

The Benefit/Risk Profile of TNF-Blocking Agents: Findings of a Consensus Panel

OBJECTIVE

To review the benefits and risks associated with the use of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers in various indications (eg, rheumatoid arthritis [RA], Crohn's disease [CD], psoriasis).

METHODS

The members of the consensus panel were selected based on their expertise. Centocor, Inc provided an educational grant to the Center for Health Care Education to facilitate the consensus panel. Peer-reviewed articles discussing clinical studies and clinical experiences with TNF-blockers form the basis of this review. Emerging data that have not been peer-reviewed are also included.

RESULTS

The TNF-blockers infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab are all approved for treatment of RA. All 3 are effective, and there are currently no published data from head-to-head clinical trials to support using 1 agent over another. Preliminary data from small, retrospective studies indicate that switching among agents to overcome inadequate efficacy or poor tolerability is beneficial in some patients. The only TNF-blocker currently approved for the induction and maintenance of remission in CD is infliximab. Preliminary data indicate that etanercept and infliximab are effective in treating psoriasis. Some risks associated with TNF-blockers have become apparent, including congestive heart failure, demyelinating diseases, and systemic lupus erythematosus, but in most cases can be identified and managed. Several of these risks (eg, lymphoma and serious infections) are associated with either the condition per se or the concomitant medication use. Simple screening procedures help manage the risk of tuberculosis infection; however, it is recommended that physicians and patients be alert to the development of any new infection so that appropriate treatment may be initiated promptly. Rare infusion reactions, particularly with infliximab, may also be effectively managed.

CONCLUSION

TNF-blockers are effective and may be safely used for short- and long-term management of RA or CD. TNF-blockers also show efficacy in other emerging indications.

Infliximab treatment for refractory Kawasaki syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha blockade for treatment of patients with Kawasaki syndrome (KS) who fail to become afebrile or who experience persistent arthritis after treatment with intravenous gamma globulin (IVIG) and high-dose aspirin.

STUDY DESIGN

Cases were retrospectively collected from clinicians throughout the United States who had used infliximab, a chimeric murine/human immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to human TNF-alpha-1, for patients with KS who had either persistent arthritis or persistent or recrudescent fever > or =48 hours following infusion of 2 g/kg of IVIG.

RESULTS

Response to therapy with cessation of fever occurred in 13 of 16 patients. C-reactive protein (CRP) level was elevated in all but one patient before infliximab infusion, and the level was lower following infusion in all 10 patients in whom it was re-measured within 48 hours of treatment. There were no infusion reactions to infliximab and no complications attributed to infliximab administration in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The success of TNF-alpha blockade in this small series of patients suggests a central role of TNF-alpha in KS pathogenesis. Controlled, randomized clinical trials are warranted to determine the role of anti-TNF-alpha therapy in KS.

Vascular comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis: potential mechanisms and solutions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarise recent evidence for elevated risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and explore explanatory mechanisms and modalities that may lessen such risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence for elevated CHD risk in RA is convincing. On current estimates, individuals who have had RA for several years have around a twofold higher risk for CHD compared with non-RA persons after taking account of most traditional risk factors. Such excess risk appears to be driven by systemic inflammation both directly via its deleterious effects on blood vessels (endothelial dysfunction inclusive of myocardial microvascular abnormalities) and indirectly by its accentuation of multiple risk pathways including lipid abnormalities. Established therapies that lessen RA disease activity and systemic inflammation will likely lessen CHD risk, although there remains considerable scope for more robust studies employing better measures of vascular disease (e.g., carotid intima-media thickening). Other emerging evidence indicates statins may have dual effects in RA, with a modest disease-modifying effect (requiring confirmation) and significant lipid-lowering action. The latter finding is particularly important because extrapolation of data from all statin endpoint trials suggests that the extent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction may account for most statin clinical benefit.

SUMMARY

Systemic inflammation is the major driver for excess vascular comorbidity in RA. Controlling systemic inflammation should lessen vascular risk but complete, long-term suppression of articular inflammation is rarely achieved. Thus, the use of conventional CHD risk reduction strategies, in particular statins, should be considered in patients with RA with prevalent CHD or at elevated risk.

Rheumatoid disease and the heart: from epidemiology to echocardiography

Rheumatoid disease (RD) is a common chronic inflammatory condition associated with progressive joint destruction. Sufferers of RD experience reduced life expectancy, reflected in the increased standardised mortality rates reported in several studies over the last 50 years. Most studies indicate that the increased mortality affecting this population is mainly due to cardio-vascular disease. Epidemiological data have revealed an increased risk of developing ischaemic heart disease and heart failure in RD. The increased risk of ischaemic heart disease may result from traditional risk factors but data suggest that RD may confer risk independently. Although pericardial involvement, valvopathy and myocarditis are the most well-recognised cardiac manifestations of RD, and constitute a rheumatoid heart disease, these features are relatively benign. The current prevalence of rheumatoid heart disease in the era of early administration of disease-modifying therapy requires evaluation.