Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences

Clinical trials of classical homeopathy: reflections on appropriate research designs

The growing popularity of complementary medicine has been accompanied by a call for controlled clinical studies to examine the efficacy and validity of its various methods. The difficulties encountered in applying the evaluation methods of conventional medicine to complementary medicine are the result of the different paradigms underlying these two methods of medicine, and the differences in the healing process. This paper attempts to bridge the gap between these two approaches and to suggest a possibility to use conventional research methodology in clinical studies of classical homeopathy. Two methods are described. One is the randomization into a placebo or a treatment group after an individual remedy is chosen for each patient. This method requires an experienced homeopath and is reproducible only by the same homeopath in the same population. On the other hand, the expected success rate will be high. Another method is prescribing and treating according to so-called keynotes, a set of symptoms known to respond to a particular remedy that must be present in a patient in order to elicit a reaction from the remedy. This method is more suitable to a conventional design of a clinical study and is reproducible by anyone. Yet the expected success rate is much lower. Some general design issues that may have a particular impact on clinical trials of classical homeopathy are discussed, including the need for sufficiently powered trials to detect relatively small effects, strategies to deal with patient preference and embracing the use of "active-control" pragmatic trial designs.

Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain

BACKGROUND

Physical conditioning programs, variously called work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration/exercise programs, aim to improve work status and function. Previous attempts have been made to evaluate the efficacy of work-oriented back pain management programs, but none have focused exclusively on work or functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of physical conditioning programs with management strategies that do not include physical conditioning programs, for workers with back and neck pain, in reducing time lost from work and increasing functional status.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following databases to 31 May 2000: MEDLINE from 1966, EMBASE from 1980, CINAHL from 1982, Biomedical Collection: I (from 1993), II (from 1995), III (from 1995), IV (from 1995), PsycINFO from 1967, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied adults with work disability related to back or neck pain, who were included in physical conditioning programs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Where data could be pooled, a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. For continuous outcomes, we nominated a saving of 10 sick days as the smallest treatment effect that would be clinically worthwhile. For dichotomous outcomes, we considered that an intervention that affected less than one in 10 people would not be clinically worthwhile.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs were identified in 20 publications. Twenty-three relevant contrasts were investigated. There is evidence that physical conditioning programs that include a cognitive-behavioural approach can reduce the number of sick days lost at 12 months follow-up by an average of 45 days, when compared to general practitioner usual care or advice, for workers with chronic back pain. For work-related outcomes, there is little evidence for or against the efficacy of specific exercises that are not accompanied by a cognitive-behavioural approach, in reducing sick days lost due to back pain, for workers with either acute or chronic back pain.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Physical conditioning programs that include a cognitive-behavioural approach plus intensive physical training (specific to the job or not) that includes aerobic capacity, muscle strength and endurance, and coordination; are in some way work-related; and are given and supervised by a physiotherapist or a multidisciplinary team, seem to be effective in reducing the number of sick days for some workers with chronic back pain, when compared to usual care. However, there is no evidence of their efficacy for acute back pain.

Rasch analysis of the Roland disability questionnaire

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey using patient questionnaires was conducted. OBJECTIVE To assess whether the Roland Disability Questionnaire satisfies the Rasch model including unidimensionality and item separation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Roland Disability Questionnaire, the most widely used patient-assessed measure of health outcome for back pain, has undergone several evaluations for its measurement properties including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. However, there is no published work relating to the underlying dimensionality of the instrument and the extent to which individual items contribute to the construct of physical disability resulting from low back pain.

METHODS

Patients entering a randomized controlled trial of exercise, manipulation, and usual management for back pain completed a questionnaire that included the Roland Disability Questionnaire. The Winsteps program was used to assess whether the Roland Disability Questionnaire fits the Rasch model. Item fit was assessed using the Infit and Outfit statistics.

RESULTS

The Roland Disability Questionnaire was completed by 1008 (90%) of the patients taking part in the trial. Most of the items in the Roland Disability Questionnaire contribute to a single underlying construct. However, four items had poor Outfit statistics, suggesting that they do not contribute sufficiently to the scale hierarchy. Several items positioned around the middle of the hierarchy are not sufficiently distinct in terms of difficulty. There were very few items positioned at the extremes of the hierarchy.

CONCLUSIONS

The Roland Disability Questionnaire largely satisfies the Rasch model for unidimensionality. However, the instrument could be improved through the removal of poorly fitting items and the addition of items at the upper and lower points of the scale hierarchy. The distribution of Roland Disability Questionnaire scores should be carefully considered before statistical testing is undertaken. Rasch transformed scores can be used to deal with deficiencies in the scale hierarchy.

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain among working age adults

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programs are widely applied for chronic low back pain patients. The biopsychosocial approach can also prevent chronicity, by providing rehabilitation for patients who still have pain past the initial acute phase. Nevertheless, multidisciplinary treatment programmes are often laborious and long processes and require good collaboration between the patient, the rehabilitation team and the work place. By using workplace visits and developing close relationships with occupational health care providers, one might expect patients' working ability to improve.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain among working age adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The reviewed studies for this review were electronically identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycLIT, CENTRAL, Medic, the Science Citation Index, reference checking and consulting experts in the rehabilitation field. The original search was planned and performed for the broader area of musculoskeletal disorders. Trials on subacute low back pain were separated afterwards. The literature search was last updated in November 2002 in EMBASE and MEDLINE.

SELECTION CRITERIA

From all references identified in our original search, we selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Trials had to assess the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for working age patients suffering from subacute low back pain (more than four weeks but less than three months). The rehabilitation program was required to be multidisciplinary, i.e., it had to consist of a physician's consultation plus either a psychological, social or vocational intervention, or a combination of these.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four reviewers blinded to journal and author selected trials that met the specified inclusion criteria. Two experts in the field of rehabilitation evaluated the clinical relevance and applicability of the findings of the selected studies for actual clinical use. Two other reviewers blinded to journal and author extracted the data and assessed the main results and the methodological quality of the studies, using standardized forms. Finally, a qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate the level of scientific evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

MAIN RESULTS

After screening 1808 abstracts, and the references of 65 reviews, we found only two relevant studies that satisfied our criteria on subacute low back pain. No more studies were found during the updates. Both studies were considered to be methodologically low quality RCTs. The clinical relevance of included studies was sufficient. There was moderate scientific evidence showing that multidisciplinary rehabilitation, which includes a workplace visit or more comprehensive occupational health care intervention, helps patients to return to work faster, results in fewer sick leaves and alleviates subjective disability.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is moderate evidence of positive effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain and that a workplace visit increases the effectiveness. But because this evidence is based on trials that had some methodological shortcomings, and several expensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes are commonly used for uncomplicated/non-specific subacute low back problems, there is an obvious need for high quality trials in this field.

Systematic review of conservative interventions for subacute low back pain

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of conservative interventions on clinically relevant outcome measures for patients with subacute low back pain. This is particularly important because effective treatment for subacute low back pain will prevent the transition to chronic low back pain, a condition that is largely responsible for the high health care costs of low back pain.

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Methodological quality of each trial was assessed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for pain and disability and risk ratios for return to work.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials were located, evaluating the following interventions: manipulation, back school, exercise, advice, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), hydrotherapy, massage, corset, cognitive behavioural treatment and co-ordination of primary health care. Most studies were of low quality and did not show a statistically significant effect of intervention. For the strict duration of low back pain (six weeks to three months), no evidence of high internal validity was found but when other methodological criteria were considered, evidence was found for the efficacy of advice. Furthermore, there is evidence that when a broader view is taken of the duration of subacute low back pain (seven days to six months), other treatments (e.g. manipulation, exercise, TENS) may be effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review identified a major gap in the evidence for interventions that are currently recommended in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of subacute low back pain. Lack of a uniform definition of subacute low back pain further limited current evidence.

A randomized trial of medical care with and without physical therapy and chiropractic care with and without physical modalities for patients with low back pain: 6-month follow-up outcomes from the UCLA low back pain study

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of medical and chiropractic care for low back pain patients in managed care; to assess the effectiveness of physical therapy among medical patients; and to assess the effectiveness of physical modalities among chiropractic patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Despite the burden that low back pain places on patients, providers, and society, the relative effectiveness of common treatment strategies offered in managed care is unknown.

METHODS

Low back pain patients presenting to a large managed care facility from October 30, 1995, through November 9, 1998, were randomly assigned in a balanced design to medical care with and without physical therapy and to chiropractic care with and without physical modalities. The primary outcome variables are average and most severe low back pain intensity in the past week, assessed with 0 to 10 numerical rating scales, and low back-related disability, assessed with the 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of 1,469 eligible patients, 681 were enrolled; 95.7% were followed through 6 months. The mean changes in low back pain intensity and disability of participants in the medical and chiropractic care-only groups were similar at each follow-up assessment (adjusted mean differences at 6 months for most severe pain, 0.27, 95% confidence interval, -0.32-0.86; average pain, 0.22, -0.25-0.69; and disability, 0.75, -0.29-1.79). Physical therapy yielded somewhat better 6-month disability outcomes than did medical care alone (1.26, 0.20-2.32).

CONCLUSIONS

After 6 months of follow-up, chiropractic care and medical care for low back pain were comparable in their effectiveness. Physical therapy may be marginally more effective than medical care alone for reducing disability in some patients, but the possible benefit is small.

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application

There is now widespread acknowledgement of the absence of a sound evidence base underpinning many of the decisions made in primary care. Randomised controlled trials represent the methodology of choicefor determining efficacy and effectiveness of interventions, yet researchers working in primary care have been reluctant to use intervention studies, favouring observational study designs. Unfamiliarity with the different trial designs now available, and the relative advantages and disadvantages conferred by each, may be one factor contributing to this paradox. In this paper, we consider the principal trial designs available to primary care researchers, discussing the contexts in which a particular design may prove most useful. This information will, we hope, also prove useful to primary care clinicians attempting to interpret trial findings.

Contribution of individual spa therapies in the treatment of chronic pain

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of individual spa therapies administered during a period of 3 weeks on measures of well being and pain in a sample of patients with chronic back pain.

DESIGN

One hundred fifty-three patients with chronic back pain undergoing inpatient spa therapy in Bad Tatzmannsdorf, Austria, participated in the study. According to the prescription of their spa physician, patients underwent two or more of the following treatments: mud packs, carbon dioxide baths, massages, exercise therapies, spinal traction, and electrotherapy. The outcome measures were general pain, back pain, negative mood, and health satisfaction. Regression analyses were conducted to predict the 4 outcome measures at the end of spa therapy and at 6 weeks' follow-up for all therapies applied. The pretreatment outcome measure, age, and sex were controlled for by entering them into the analysis.

RESULTS

Patients showed significant improvements in all 4 outcome measures. The prediction of improvement was generally small: only 1% to 11% of the change of the outcome measures could be explained by the type and number of therapies received. On a short-term basis, mud packs and exercise were found to be associated with a greater improvement in mood, whereas a greater frequency of massage therapy and carbon dioxide baths was associated with a smaller improvement in health satisfaction. On a long-term basis, exercise therapy and spinal traction were associated with a greater reduction in back pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that, in addition to the individual therapies, other factors relating to spa therapy as a whole must contribute to overall treatment outcome. In addition, the results support the efficacy of exercise therapy for chronic back pain.

Pain beliefs and perceived physical disability of patients with chronic low back pain

Cognitive-behavioural therapy and maintenance of exercise have emerged as major tools in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. Patients' beliefs about their problem may influence their uptake of and responses to particular treatment modalities. In particular, we hypothesised that patients' beliefs about the cause and treatment of pain may mediate changes in physical disability following participation in a multidisciplinary pain management programme. A cohort of 84 patients was invited to respond to booklets of self-report questionnaires prior to, immediately after and 3 months following participation in multidisciplinary pain management programmes. Questionnaires addressed subjects' beliefs about the nature and treatment of pain (Pain Beliefs Questionnaire), and their disability (Likert-modified Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire, Physical Functioning scale of the Short Form-36 Health Survey, and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire). Patients with chronic low back pain who more strongly endorsed 'organic' concepts about the nature and treatment of pain reported higher levels of physical disability at baseline, and displayed greater reductions in disability following participation in the pain management programmes. Reductions in reported 'organic' pain beliefs were associated with improvements in reported disability. Endorsement of 'psychological' concepts about the nature and treatment of pain was not associated with disability. These findings support a view that patients' beliefs about the nature and treatment of their pain can change during participation in a multidisciplinary pain management programme based on cognitive-behavioural intervention. Modification of these beliefs may be associated with improvements in patients' perceptions of the level of their disability.

Quality of life and cost of care of back pain patients in Finnish general practice

STUDY DESIGN

A cohort of 114 primary care patients were studied for 1 year before and 1 year after a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the therapy use, societal costs, and quality of life of patients with prolonged back pain. To compare the effects of physiotherapy, bone setting, and light exercise therapy on these measures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Analyses of back pain have mostly focused on the minority of patients who cause high costs and a heavy burden on national economies. The majority with low costs have aroused less interest. The patient's choice of therapy, especially alternative medicine, has seldom been evaluated despite the increasing popularity of alternative therapies.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Social Insurance Institution files, patient records, and questionnaires: the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP).

RESULTS

One year before enrollment a third of the patients had consulted primary care. Half of them had had some therapy: mainly massage, physiotherapy, naprapathy, or bone setting. One third of the direct costs were spent on complementary therapies and another third on rehabilitation. Sick leaves accounted for 55% of the total costs (US$ 1029). The mean total costs slightly increased after the randomized therapies (US$ 1306). The costs of ambulatory care, with the study therapies included, were similar, whereas physiotherapy seemed the cheapest (US$ 621) and bone setting the most expensive (US$ 2072) alternative in view of the total costs. More NHP subscales were improved by physiotherapy and bone setting than by exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

A third of the direct back pain costs were spent on complementary therapies. The use of health care services and absenteeism tended to decrease after a course of physiotherapy. Physiotherapy and bone setting seemed able to improve the quality of life of patients with prolonged back pain.

Early intervention for acute back injury: can we finally develop an evidence-based approach?

OBJECTIVE

Several reviews of the treatment of acute low back pain have been published in the past and have formed the basis of clinical guidelines. However, these lack consistency in some areas and valid data in others. As the literature in this field has continued to expand, the present review was undertaken to establish whether the guidelines in current use are supported by more recently published, scientifically rigorous research, and whether additional consensus regarding treatment of acute low back injury has been forthcoming in recent years.

DESIGN

A review, and critical analysis, of literature relating to the treatment of acute low back pain that has been published since the production of the currently used clinical guidelines. The guidelines have been reviewed to assess whether their recommendations remain supportable.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent research appears to support current clinical guidelines, i.e. exercise may have a positive effect while bed rest is ineffective and may be harmful, simple analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have short-term benefits, and spinal manipulation may be effective in the first four weeks; no evidence was found for traction or back schools. However, we need more randomized controlled trials of treatments shown to be successful with the chronic population, e.g. focused on understanding psychological determinants, and using a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial approach. In the future this may help us to prevent acute low back progressing to the chronic state.

The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001

Low back pain (LBP) poses an economic burden to society, mainly in terms of the large number of work days lost by a small percentage of patients who develop chronic LBP. The object of this review is to gain a better understanding of the societal costs of LBP and to see whether current clinical management follows evidence-based guidelines and is economically attractive, by reviewing studies on LBP with economic implications. To this end, the Medline database was searched between 1996 and 2001 using appropriate keywords, broadly defined. A total of 372 abstracts were screened and paper copies of 73 potentially relevant articles were obtained. It was found that the cost of LBP illness was high and was comparable to other disorders such as headache, heart disease, depression or diabetes, but actual cost estimates varied depending on the costing methodology employed. A small percentage of patients with chronic LBP accounts for a large fraction of the costs. Excessive and inappropriate use of diagnostic or therapeutic services can be documented but varied by region and provider type. Management according to evidence-based guidelines was not necessarily economically attractive. Interventions for acute or chronic LBP failed to show economic benefits, but demonstrated modest clinical benefits, which suggested a weak relationship between clinical and economic outcomes. The conclusion was that common definitions and costing methodologies need to be found to gain a better understanding of the true costs to society and to make studies comparable. A better definition is needed for the type for patient with LBP for whom therapeutic management is most likely to have a long-lasting economic benefit.

Second Prize: The effectiveness of physical modalities among patients with low back pain randomized to chiropractic care: findings from the UCLA low back pain study

BACKGROUND

Although chiropractors often use physical modalities with spinal manipulation, evidence that modalities yield additional benefits over spinal manipulation alone is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to estimate the net effect of physical modalities on low back pain (LBP) outcomes among chiropractic patients in a managed-care setting.

METHODS

Fifty percent of the 681 patients participating in a clinical trial of LBP treatment strategies were randomized to chiropractic care with physical modalities (n = 172) or without physical modalities (n = 169). Subjects were followed for 6 months with assessments at 2, 4, and 6 weeks and at 6 months. The primary outcome variables were average and most severe LBP intensity in the past week, assessed with numerical rating scales (0-10), and low back-related disability, assessed with the 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Almost 60% of the subjects had baseline LBP episodes of more than 3 months' duration. The 6-month follow-up was 96%. The adjusted mean differences between groups in improvements in average and most severe pain and disability were clinically insignificant at all follow-up assessments. Clinically relevant improvements in average pain and disability were more likely in the modalities group at 2 and 6 weeks, but this apparent advantage disappeared at 6 months. Perceived treatment effectiveness was greater in the modalities group.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical modalities used by chiropractors in this managed-care organization did not appear to be effective in the treatment of patients with LBP, although a small short-term benefit for some patients cannot be ruled out.

The effect of maximal exercise on temporal summation of second pain (windup) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome

Exercise activates endogenous opioid and adrenergic systems, but attenuation of experimental pain by exercise has not been shown consistently. In this study, effects of exercise on temporal summation of late pain responses to stimulation of unmyelinated (C) nociceptors were assessed. When a preheated thermode was applied repetitively to glabrous skin of the hand in a series of brief contacts at rates of 0.2 to 0.5 Hz, the perceived intensity of late thermal sensations increased after successive contacts. This summation of pain sensations provides information regarding the status of central opioid and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor systems. For normal subjects, temporal summation of late pain sensations was substantially attenuated when testing began 1.5 or 10 minutes after exercise. Individuals diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) report generalized chronic pain that is increased after exercise. Therefore, we hypothesized that strenuous exercise would increase summation of late pain sensations in this cohort. Patients with FMS and control subjects exerted to similarly high metabolic rates, as shown by physiologic monitoring. Ratings of late pain sensations increased for patients with FMS after exercise, an effect opposite to a decrease in ratings for age/sex-matched control subjects. In contrast to this result for experimentally induced pain, clinical pain ratings were not substantially altered after strenuous exercise by patients with FMS.

Preferences and understanding their effects on health

Preference for a particular intervention may, possibly via complicated pathways, itself confer an outcome advantage which will be subsumed in unblind randomised trials as part of the measured effectiveness of the intervention. Where more attractive interventions are compared with less attractive ones, any difference could therefore be a consequence of attractiveness and not its intrinsic worth. For health promotion interventions this is clearly important, but we cannot tell how important it is for therapeutic interventions without special studies to measure or refute such effects. These are difficult to do and are complex. Until the therapeutic effects of preference itself are more clearly understood, understanding the true therapeutic effects will be compromised, at least in principle.

Exercises and education as secondary prevention for recurrent low back pain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Exercise and education is a common physiotherapy approach in the prevention of low back pain. A Mensendieck exercise programme consisting of exercises and ergonomical education has, in a previous study, been shown to be effective in preventing recurrent low back pain during one-year follow-up. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term effect of the Mensendieck exercise programme on people with recurrent episodes of low back pain who, when entering the study, had finished treatment for their last episode of low back pain.

METHOD

A randomized controlled clinical trial in which 41 women and 36 men were allocated to either a Mensendieck or control group. The Mensendieck subjects received 20 group sessions of exercises and ergonomical education over 13 weeks. The control subjects were not offered any prophylactic therapy, but were free to receive treatment or exercises. Outcome measures were the number of recurrences of low back pain, sick leave, low back function and general functional status.

RESULTS

At three-year follow-up, 11 subjects had been lost to the study. Survival analysis showed a significant reduction (p = 0.02) in subjects experiencing recurrent low back pain in the Mensendieck group compared to the control group. Significant improvements in pain and function scores were reported in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in pain, function or sick leave.

CONCLUSION

A Mensendieck exercise programme seems efficient in reducing recurrent episodes of low back pain at three-year follow-up, but it did not influence sick leave, pain or function scores.

The role of fear-avoidance beliefs in acute low back pain: relationships with current and future disability and work status

Fear-avoidance beliefs have been identified as an important psychosocial variable in patients with chronic disability doe to low back pain. The importance of fear-avoidance beliefs for individuals with acute low back pain has not been explored. Seventy-eight subjects with work-related low back pain of less than 3 weeks'duration were studied. Measurements of pain intensity, physical impairment, disability, nonorganic signs and symptoms, and depression were taken at the initial evaluation. Fear-avoidance beliefs were measured with the work and physical activity subscales of the Fear-avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. Disability and work status were re-assessed after 4 weeks of physical therapy. Patterns of correlation between fear-avoidance beliefs and other concurrently-measured variables were similar to those reported in patients with chronic low back pain. Fear-avoidance beliefs did not explain a significant amount of the variability in initial disability levels after controlling for pain intensity and physical impairment. Fear-avoidance beliefs about work were significant predictors of 4-week disability and work status even after controlling for initial levels of pain intensity, physical impairment, and disability, and the type of therapy received. Fear-avoidance beliefs are present in patients with acute low back pain, and may be an important factor in explaining the transition from acute to chronic conditions. Screening for fear-avoidance beliefs may be useful for identifying patients at risk of prolonged disability and work absence.

Should we give detailed advice and information booklets to patients with back pain? A randomized controlled factorial trial of a self-management booklet and doctor advice to take exercise for back pain

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled factorial trial.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of a booklet and of physician advice to take regular exercise.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Educational booklets are one of the simplest interventions for back pain but have not been shown to alter pain and function. Although there is evidence that advice to mobilize is effective, doctors have also been advised to encourage regular exercise-but there is no evidence that such advice alone improves outcomes.

METHOD

Eight doctors from six practices randomized 311 patients with a new episode of back pain using sealed numbered opaque envelopes to receive a detailed self-management booklet, advice to take regular exercise, both, or neither. All groups were advised to mobilize and to use simple analgesia. Patients were telephoned during the first week after entry into the study, and after 3 weeks to assess a validated numerical pain/function score (0 = no pain normal activities to 100 = extreme pain no normal activities). Patients also returned a postal questionnaire in the first week with the Aberdeen pain and function scale, a knowledge score, and a reliable satisfaction scale (mean score of 4 items: 0 = not satisfied to 100 = extremely satisfied).

RESULTS

Pain/function scores were obtained in 239 (77%) patients. There were interactions between exercise and booklet groups for both pain/function scores and the Aberdeen scale, which are unlikely to have been chance findings (P = 0.009 and P = 0.012, respectively). In comparison with the control group, there were reductions in the pain/function score in the first week with a booklet (-8.7, 95% CI -17.4 to -0.03) or advice to exercise (-7.9; -16.7 to 0.8) but much less effect with both together (-0.08, -9.0 to 8.9). Similarly, the Aberdeen scale was lower in the booklet group (-3.8, -7.7 to 0.07) and in the exercise advice group (-5.3; -9.3 to -1.38) but much less with both combined (-1.9, -5.8 to 2.1). There was no significant difference between groups in pain/function scores by week 3, when 58% reported being back to normal. Satisfaction was increased in booklet (7.9, 1.3 to 14.4) and exercise groups (7.4, 0.8 to 13.9)), and a booklet also increased knowledge (Kruskal-Wallis chi2 27.2, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Doctors can increase satisfaction and moderately improve functional outcomes in the period immediately after the consultation when back pain is worst, by using very simple interventions: either by endorsing a self-management booklet or by giving advice to take exercise. Previous studies suggest that simple advice and the same written information provide reinforcement. This study supports evidence that it may not be helpful to provide a detailed information booklet and advice together, where the amounts or formats of information differ.

How effective is the acute low back pain screening questionnaire for predicting 1-year follow-up in patients with low back pain?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate potential associations between the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire (ALBPSQ), a biopsychosocial screening instrument for identifying patients at risk of chronicity, and relevant variables at 1-year follow-up in a cohort of patients with low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN

A 1-year prospective study was conducted in which patients who had previously received treatment in the Northern Ireland National Health Service (n = 118) were requested to complete a follow-up questionnaire package of pain and functional disability measures and a patient-centered questionnaire of seven variables considered relevant from the patient's perspective.

PATIENTS

Ninety patients (76% response rate) returned the completed questionnaire package.

RESULTS

The ALBPSQ total score and cutoff score of 112 were significantly positively associated with the pain and functional disability questionnaire scores at follow-up but did not significantly discriminate for difference scores on these measures. Although six of the seven patient-centered variables were significantly associated with the screening questionnaire total score, the cutoff score was strongly predictive of only one variable (work loss) and failed to demonstrate high levels of sensitivity for other variables (i.e., medication use, additional treatment, poor exercise participation).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrate that scores on the ALBPSQ were positively correlated with patients' levels of pain and functional disability at 1-year follow-up and correctly classified all patients reporting some degree of work loss but had minimal predictive strength for the other patient-centered variables evaluated.

Preferences and understanding their effects on health

Preference for a particular intervention may, possibly via complicated pathways, itself confer an outcome advantage which will be subsumed in unblind randomised trials as part of the measured effectiveness of the intervention. Where more attractive interventions are compared with less attractive ones, any difference could therefore be a consequence of attractiveness and not its intrinsic worth. For health promotion interventions this is clearly important, but we cannot tell how important it is for therapeutic interventions without special studies to measure or refute such effects. These are difficult to do and are complex. Until the therapeutic effects of preference itself are more clearly understood, understanding the true therapeutic effects will be compromised, at least in principle.

Principles of perioperative pain management in older adults

The consequences of poor planning for pain management during surgery of geriatric patients not only affect the immediate well-being of the patient but also have terrible socioeconomic implications. Delays in rehabilitation, increases in hospital lengths of stay, and increased comorbidity can be expected if interventions for pain management are either inadequate or excessive without appropriate monitoring. During surgery, seniors are likely to suffer from acute and chronic pain that must be addressed aggressively in the postoperative period to ensure a rapid functional recovery. New pain scales have been developed with seniors in mind, and greater testing of older scales in elderly populations have helped to identify measures of pain more suited to frail seniors. This article is designed to help clinicians to strategically implement optimal pain management principles and techniques and, thus, help to fulfill the obligation to relieve pain and suffering in patients in the perioperative period, which will ensure the greatest chance of recovery to optimal independence for patients.

Lessons from a trial of acupuncture and massage for low back pain: patient expectations and treatment effects

STUDY DESIGN

A subanalysis of data derived from a randomized clinical trial was performed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of a patient's expectation for benefit from a specific treatment with improved functional outcome.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Psychosocial factors, ambiguous diagnoses, and lack of a clearly superior treatment have complicated the management of patients with chronic low back pain. The authors hypothesized that patient expectation for benefit from a specific treatment is associated with improved functional outcomes when that treatment is administered.

METHODS

In a randomized trial, 135 patients with chronic low back pain who received acupuncture or massage were studied. Before randomization, study participants were asked to describe their expectations regarding the helpfulness of each treatment on a scale of 0 to 10. The primary outcome was level of function at 10 weeks as measured by the modified Roland Disability scale.

RESULTS

After adjustment for baseline characteristics, improved function was observed for 86% of the participants with higher expectations for the treatment they received, as compared with 68% of those with lower expectations (P = 0.01). Furthermore, patients who expected greater benefit from massage than from acupuncture were more likely to experience better outcomes with massage than with acupuncture, and vice versa (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that patient expectations may influence clinical outcome independently of the treatment itself. In contrast, general optimism about treatment, divorced from a specific treatment, is not strongly associated with outcome. These results may have important implications for clinical trial design and recruitment, and may help to explain the apparent success of some conventional and alternative therapies in trials that do not control for patient expectations. The findings also may be important for therapy choices made in the clinical setting.

Dose-response of physical activity and low back pain, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the evidence for causal relationships between physical activity (PA) and low back pain (LBP), osteoarthritis (OA), and osteoporosis (OP), and for dose-response relations involved.

METHODS

Computer database searches and personal retrieval systems were used to locate relevant literature.

RESULTS

PA can be effective in preventing LBP (Category A) but prolonged, heavy loading can lead to LBP (Category C). Specific exercises have not been found effective in treatment of acute LBP (Category A), but PA can be effective in chronic LBP (Category B), especially for diminishing the effects of deconditioning. No evidence indicates that PA directly prevents OA. Large amounts of intensive PA involving high impacts or torsional loadings or causing injuries increases risk of OA (Category C). Light or moderate PA does not increase the risk of OA (Category C). PA can be effective in the treatment and rehabilitation of OA (Category B). High-intensity loading is osteogenic and possibly useful in prevention of OP (Category A) at the loaded site, but low to moderate loading is not osteogenic (Category D). Static efforts and slow movements are ineffective or less effective than fast application of force (Category B). The types of PA to attain the effects mentioned above are known except in the case of prevention of LBP, but dose-response relationships are poorly known; at best, semiquantitatively on the basis of just a few studies.

CONCLUSION

Given the shown primary and/or secondary preventative effectiveness of PA regarding LBP, OA, and OP, research to elucidate the inadequately known dose-response relations should be given high priority.

Pain management in older adults: prevention and treatment

The release of guidelines in 1998 by the American Geriatrics Society on "The Management of Chronic Pain in Older Persons" was a breakthrough in helping to manage pain in this population. Already advances have fostered a need to update recommendations. This article focuses on the treatment strategies available for seniors that are likely to help to fulfill the obligation to relieve pain and suffering in patients. A review was done of the literature using Medline and other search techniques. New pain scales have been developed with seniors in mind and greater testing of older scales in elderly populations have helped to identify measures of pain more suited to frail seniors. Advances in cyclooxygenase inhibition selectivity, alternative medicine, and progress in the identification of nonopioid pain receptors and the development of products to target them are just a few of changes that have altered the way clinicians think about treating pain. The use of hospice in end-of-life palliative care is a valuable resource for clinicians managing pain at that phase in care as well. Tools are available to prevent and treat pain successfully in seniors. Educating clinicians about available assessment tools, techniques and interventions may be the biggest challenge to comforting the older adult in pain.

Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain

STUDY DESIGN

A longitudinal study using patient questionnaires was performed.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the discriminatory power and responsiveness of the Aberdeen Back Pain Scale (ABPS), the Roland Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and the EuroQol in patients with low back pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A number instruments specific to low back pain have not been compared for measurement properties. The EuroQol is a widely used generic instrument that has not been compared with specific instruments in patients with back pain.

METHODS

A questionnaire incorporating the Aberdeen Back Pain Scale, the Roland Disability Questionnaire, and the EuroQol was completed by patients taking part in a clinical trial of exercise treatments for back pain. Patients completed follow-up questionnaires at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. The discriminatory power of these instruments was assessed against variables relating to activity limitations, medication, and comorbidity. Responsiveness was assessed using standardized response means.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 187 patients taking part in the clinical trial. The Aberdeen instrument was found to be the most powerful at discriminating between different groups of patients on variables relating to activity limitations, medication, and comorbidity. The specific instruments demonstrated good levels of responsiveness, with the Aberdeen instrument producing the largest standardized response means. The Aberdeen instrument was more responsive to the smaller changes experienced by the control group, but was less powerful than the Roland at measuring differences in the levels of change between the two groups of patients at two of the three follow-up assessments in the trial. The EuroQol demonstrated a moderate level of responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The two specific instruments are capable of greater levels of discrimination between groups of patients, and are more responsive over time than the generic EuroQol. The Aberdeen instrument performed most satisfactorily in relation to these criteria, but the Roland instrument was more sensitive to differences between the two groups in the clinical trial. The measurement properties of these two instruments reflect their origin: The Aberdeen instrument is based on clinical questions, whereas the Roland instrument is based on the generic Sickness Impact Profile. Instrument content should be carefullyconsidered when selecting instruments for applications, including clinical trials.

Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap

Health economic evaluations are now more commonly being included in pragmatic randomized trials. However a variety of methods are being used for the presentation and analysis of the resulting cost data, and in many cases the approaches taken are inappropriate. In order to inform health care policy decisions, analysis needs to focus on arithmetic mean costs, since these will reflect the total cost of treating all patients with the disease. Thus, despite the often highly skewed distribution of cost data, standard non-parametric methods or use of normalizing transformations are not appropriate. Although standard parametric methods of comparing arithmetic means may be robust to non-normality for some data sets, this is not guaranteed. While the randomization test can be used to overcome assumptions of normality, its use for comparing means is still restricted by the need for similarly shaped distributions in the two groups. In this paper we show how the non-parametric bootstrap provides a more flexible alternative for comparing arithmetic mean costs between randomized groups, avoiding the assumptions which limit other methods. Details of several bootstrap methods for hypothesis tests and confidence intervals are described and applied to cost data from two randomized trials. The preferred bootstrap approaches are the bootstrap-t or variance stabilized bootstrap-t and the bias corrected and accelerated percentile methods. We conclude that such bootstrap techniques can be recommended either as a check on the robustness of standard parametric methods, or to provide the primary statistical analysis when making inferences about arithmetic means for moderately sized samples of highly skewed data such as costs.

A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavioral program for enhancing back pain self care in a primary care setting

Back pain is a significant health care problem that has been managed unsatisfactorily in primary care settings. Providers typically address medical issues but do not adequately address patient concerns or functional limitations related to back pain. We evaluated a brief intervention for primary care back pain patients designed to provide accurate information about back pain, instill attitudes favorable towards self care, reduce fears and worries, assist patients in developing personalized action plans to manage their back pain, and improve functional outcomes. Patients enrolled in a large health maintenance organization were invited to participate in an educational program to improve back pain self care skills 6-8 weeks after a primary care back pain visit. Patients (n=226) were randomly assigned to a Self Care intervention or to Usual Care, and were assessed at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-months. The intervention involved a two-session Self Care group and an individual meeting and telephone conversation with the group leader, a psychologist experienced in chronic pain management. The intervention was supplemented by educational materials (book and videos) supporting active management of back pain. The control group received usual care supplemented by a book on back pain care. Participants assigned to the Self Care intervention showed significantly greater reductions in back-related worry and fear-avoidance beliefs than the control group. Modest, but statistically significant, effects on pain ratings and interference with activities were also observed.

Recruiting patients to randomized trials in primary care: principles and case study

BACKGROUND

There are many factors affecting recruitment to trials in primary care, and trials are often jeopardized due to the inability to enter sufficient patient numbers. It is generally agreed that the interest in and commitment of GPs to the project are important, and their forgetfulness and time pressures are major factors which mitigate against maximal recruitment.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to focus on maximizing recruitment of patients to a randomized controlled trial of exercise classes for back pain patients.

METHODS

Two distinct methods of recruitment were used. One practice provided a computerized list of names and asked patients' permission, by letter, to be contacted by the researchers. The other 18 practices manually recorded referrals after the consultation by the GP.

RESULTS

Referral rates were slower than expected. Many patients either did not fit the inclusion criteria or excluded themselves due to domestic commitments or work. During 24 months, 1588 patients were referred. A total of 187 patients (12%) met the criteria and could be included in the study. The practice which referred patients through a computerized listing contributed 44% of the patients successfully included in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Recruitment rates depended on the method and rate of GP referrals, the proportion of referrals meeting the entry criteria and the proportion of patients available to attend the exercise classes.

Spine fusion for discogenic low back pain: outcomes in patients treated with or without pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation

Sixty-one randomly selected patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgeries for discogenic low back pain between 1987 and 1994 were retrospectively studied. All patients had failed to respond to preoperative conservative treatments. Forty-two patients received adjunctive therapy with pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation, and 19 patients received no electrical stimulation of any kind. Average follow-up time was 15.6 months postoperatively. Fusion succeeded in 97.6% of the PEMF group and in 52.6% of the unstimulated group (P < .001). The observed agreement between clinical and radiographic outcome was 75%. The use of PEMF stimulation enhances bony bridging in lumbar spinal fusions. Successful fusion underlies a good clinical outcome in patients with discogenic low back pain.