Systemic anti-infective periodontal therapy. A systematic review

Proportion of antibiotic resistance in subgingival plaque samples from Mexican subjects

AIM

To determine the proportion of bacteria resistant to amoxicillin and doxycycline in subgingival plaque samples from Mexican subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two subgingival plaque samples were taken from 20 Mexican subjects. Samples were dispersed, diluted and plated on non-antibiotic agar plates and on plates containing 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 microg/ml of either amoxicillin or doxycycline. The proportion of resistant bacteria was calculated based on the total number of colony-forming units present in the non-antibiotic containing plates.

RESULTS

On average, 0.4-13.4% and 0.9-20.4% of the total cultivable subgingival microbiota was resistant to the concentrations tested of amoxicillin and doxycycline, respectively. The differences between antibiotics were statistically significant for the 0.5, 2 and 4 mug/ml concentrations (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon's test).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed that a relatively small proportion of the total cultivable subgingival microbiota from Mexican subjects was resistant to amoxicillin and doxycycline.

Clinical and microbiological effects of different antimicrobials on generalized aggressive periodontitis

AIM

To evaluate and compare the effects of adjunctive metronidazole plus amoxicillin, doxycycline and metronidazole on clinical and microbiological parameters in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-three patients participated in this randomized clinical trial divided into four groups. Six weeks after scaling and root planning (SRP), groups 1-3 received adjunctive metronidazole, plus amoxicillin, doxycycline and metronidazole respectively, and group 4 acted as controls. Clinical recordings concerning probing depth, probing attachment level and bleeding on probing were performed at baseline, 6 weeks after SRP and 6 months from baseline. Subgingival samples were analysed using the 'checkerboard' DNA-DNA hybridization for Porphyromonas gingivalis, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythia and Treponema denticola.

RESULTS

All treatments resulted in improvement of clinical parameters (ANOVA p > 0.05). Systemic administration of metronidazole plus amoxicillin or metronidazole resulted in statistically significant greater reduction of the proportion of sites > 6 mm than SRP (z-test, p < 0.05). These antimicrobials yielded a significant effect on levels of important periodontal pathogens for 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive metronidazole plus amoxicillin or metronidazole alone (when A.actinomycetemcomitans is not involved) is effective in deep pockets of aggressive periodontitis patients.

The Effect of Patient-Centered Plaque Control and Periodontal Maintenance Therapy on Adverse Outcomes of Periodontitis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate systematic reviews that addressed the effectiveness of periodontal maintenance therapy for the management of patients with periodontitis. Recent surveys of dental care patterns suggest a marked increase in preventive and maintenance periodontal care in populations that retain the dentition for an increasingly longer lifetime. A considerable body of clinical investigation concludes that a multitherapy periodontal maintenance approach is effective in improving periodontal outcomes in patients treated for periodontitis. Individual components of such maintenance therapy were assessed, including the effects of an oral examination, personal oral hygiene instructions, supragingival scaling and polishing, subgingival scaling and root planing, adjunctive procedures, and maintenance frequency. There is much controversy about improvement in oral health that may accrue from the placebo effect of an examination and the maintenance ritual. Improved plaque control by the patient in anticipation of a forthcoming examination alone might be reflected in decreased measurements for plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation but the role of placebo effects on periodontitis remains unclear. There are insufficient randomized controlled trials to reach conclusions regarding the individual beneficial effects of repeated oral hygiene instructions or routine scaling/polishing on the recurrence of periodontitis. While subgingival root planing seems an effective component of periodontal maintenance, neither clinical investigations nor randomly controlled trial evidence have established an ideal maintenance frequency based on individual patient risk for periodontitis. The adjunctive beneficial effects of both locally and systemically administered antimicrobial agents were statistically significant for some formulations, and may be particularly useful clinically in patients who are resistant to mechanical therapy. We conclude that few clinical or randomized controlled studies have evaluated the individual benefit or required frequency of the periodontal maintenance ritual for patients who are relatively resistant or susceptible to periodontitis.

Clarithromycin reduces recurrent cardiovascular events in subjects without periodontitis

Inflammation leading to acute coronary syndrome may be triggered by bacteria causing periodontal infection. We investigated if recurrence of cardiovascular events in unstable coronary patients are associated with periodontitis or microbiological/serological markers of it. Periodontitis-related parameters of 141 patients with acute non-Q-wave infarction or unstable angina pectoris, who participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study with clarithromycin for 3 months, were adjusted to the occurrence of a recurrent cardiovascular event during a follow-up period (average 519 days). In the age group under 65 years the patients with periodontitis had a univariate odds ratios (OR) 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of 5.0 (1.02-24.55) for a recurrent cardiovascular event in comparison with patients without periodontitis. Dental status correlated positively with serum lipopolysaccharide concentrations and combined IgG antibody response to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis. The end point frequency did not differ between clarithromycin and placebo groups in bacterium-positive, seropositive, or periodontitis patients. Fewer end points in clarithromycin group were seen in bacterium-negative, seronegative, edentulous, and non-periodontitis patients. Periodontitis and edentulousness are associated with recurrent cardiovascular events, especially in younger patients. Long-term clarithromycin therapy seems to be beneficial in prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events in non-periodontitis but not in periodontitis patients.

Periodontal diseases

The periodontal diseases are highly prevalent and can affect up to 90% of the worldwide population. Gingivitis, the mildest form of periodontal disease, is caused by the bacterial biofilm (dental plaque) that accumulates on teeth adjacent to the gingiva (gums). However, gingivitis does not affect the underlying supporting structures of the teeth and is reversible. Periodontitis results in loss of connective tissue and bone support and is a major cause of tooth loss in adults. In addition to pathogenic microorganisms in the biofilm, genetic and environmental factors, especially tobacco use, contribute to the cause of these diseases. Genetic, dermatological, haematological, granulomatous, immunosuppressive, and neoplastic disorders can also have periodontal manifestations. Common forms of periodontal disease have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, cardiovascular disease, stroke, pulmonary disease, and diabetes, but the causal relations have not been established. Prevention and treatment are aimed at controlling the bacterial biofilm and other risk factors, arresting progressive disease, and restoring lost tooth support.

Clindamycin in dentistry: More than just effective prophylaxis for endocarditis?

Clindamycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with activity against aerobic, anaerobic, and beta-lactamase-producing pathogens. This antibiotic has been used for many years as prophylactic treatment during dental procedures to prevent endocarditis. However, the spectrum and susceptibility of the bacteria species involved in dental infections indicate that clindamycin would also be an effective treatment option for these conditions. In addition to its antiinfective properties, clindamycin has high oral absorption, significant tissue penetration, including penetration into bone, and stimulatory effects on the host immune system. This review discusses the microbiologic and clinical evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of clindamycin for the successful management of dental infections.

Adjunctive benefits of systemic amoxicillin and metronidazole in non-surgical treatment of generalized aggressive periodontitis: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the adjunctive clinical effect of the administration of systemic amoxicillin and metronidazole in the non-surgical treatment of generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP).

METHODS

Forty-one systemically healthy subjects with GAP were included in this 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Patients received a course of full-mouth non-surgical periodontal treatment delivered over a 24 h period using machine-driven and hand instruments. Test subjects received an adjunctive course of systemic antibiotic consisting of 500 mg amoxicillin and 500 mg metronidazole three times a day for 7 days. Clinical parameters were collected at baseline, and at 2 and 6 months post-treatment.

RESULTS

In both the test and the placebo groups, all clinical parameters improved at 2 and 6 months. In deep pockets (> or =7 mm), the test treatment resulted in an additional 1.4 mm (95% confidence interval 0.8, 2.0 mm) in full-mouth probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction and 1 mm (0.7, 1.3 mm) of life cumulative attachment loss (LCAL) gain at 6 months. In moderate pockets (4-6 mm), the adjunctive benefit was smaller in magnitude: PPD reduction was 0.4 mm (0.1, 0.7 mm) and LCAL gain was 0.5 mm (0.2, 0.8 mm). In addition, the 6-month data showed LCAL gains > or =2 mm at 25% of sites in test patients compared with 16% in placebo (p=0.028). Similarly, PPD reductions of 2 mm or more were observed in 30% of sites in test and 21% of sites in placebo patients. Seventy-four percent of pockets with PPD > or =5 mm at baseline were 4 mm or shallower at 6 months in the test group. This compared with 54% in the placebo group (p=0.008). Disease progression at 6 months was observed at 1.5% of test and 3.3% of sites in test and placebo, respectively (p=0.072).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that a 7-day adjunctive course of systemic metronidazole and amoxicillin significantly improved the short-term clinical outcomes of full-mouth non-surgical periodontal debridement in subjects with GAP.

Rifaximin, a Peculiar Rifamycin Derivative: Established and Potential Clinical Use Outside the Gastrointestinal Tract

Rifaximin is a poorly absorbed semisynthetic rifamycin derivative with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, both aerobes and anaerobes. Although originally developed for the treatment of infectious diarrhea, the appreciation of the pathogenic role of gut bacteria in several organic and functional gastrointestinal diseases has increasingly broadened its clinical use. The availability of a topical formulation (a cream containing 5% of the drug) and the lack of transcutaneous absorption pointed out in both animal and human studies has allowed its topical use in skin infections. Furthermore, since the spectrum of antibacterial action of rifaximin includes many organisms (e.g. Bacteroides bivius-disiens, Gardnerella vaginalis, Haemophilus ducreyi) causing genital infections, including Trichomonas vaginalis and Chlamydia trachomatis, its local application in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV) has been attempted. Finally, since periodontal disease, caused by plaque (an aggregate of various bacteria), can be considered a 'local' infection, intrapocket rifaximin was tried in the treatment of periodontal infections. While the efficacy in pyogenic infections of the skin has been confirmed by several investigations, which showed an improvement of both subjective and objective parameters significantly better than that of the reference drug (i.e. chlortetracycline or oxytetracycline), the usefulness of rifaximin in BV and periodontal disease needs to be further studied in well-designed clinical trials.

Systemic antibiotics in periodontics

This position paper addresses the role of systemic antibiotics in the treatment of periodontal disease. Topical antibiotic therapy is not discussed here. The paper was prepared by the Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. The document consists of three sections: 1) concept of antibiotic periodontal therapy; 2) efficacy of antibiotic periodontal therapy; and 3) practical aspects of antibiotic periodontal therapy. The conclusions drawn in this paper represent the position of the American Academy of Periodontology and are intended for the information of the dental profession.

Clinical Response of Azithromycin as an Adjunct to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Smokers

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic therapy can be used in very specific periodontal treatment situations such as in refractory cases of periodontal disease found to be more prevalent in smokers. This study was designed to determine the efficacy of azithromycin (AZM) when combined with scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic periodontitis in smokers.

METHODS

Thirty-one subjects were enrolled into a 6-month randomized, single-masked trial to evaluate clinical, microbial (using benzoyl- DL-arginine naphthylamine [BANA] assay), and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) pyridinoline cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) levels in response to SRP alone or SRP + AZM. At baseline, patients who smoked > or =1 pack per day of cigarettes who presented with at least five sites with probing depths (PD) of > or =5 mm with bleeding on probing (BOP) were randomized into the test or control groups. At baseline and 3 and 6 months, clinical measurements (probing depth [PD], clinical attachment loss [CAL], and bleeding on probing [BOP]) were performed. GCF bone marker assessment (Ctelopeptide [ICTP] as well as BANA test analyses) were performed at baseline, 14 days, and 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that both groups displayed clinical improvements in PD and CAL that were sustained for 6 months. Using a subject-based analysis, patients treated with SRP + AZM showed enhanced reductions in PD and gains in CAL at moderate (4 to 6 mm) and deep sites (>6 mm) (P <0.05). Furthermore, SRP + AZM resulted in greater reductions in BANA levels compared to SRP alone (P <0.05) while rebounds in BANA levels were noted in control group at the 6-month evaluation. No statistically significant differences between groups on mean BOP and ICTP levels during the course of the study were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of AZM in combination with SRP improves the efficacy of non-surgical periodontal therapy in reducing probing depth and improving attachment levels in smokers with moderate to advanced attachment loss.

Translating findings of systematic reviews into consensus statements on periodontal therapy

BACKGROUND

The greatest value of the biomedical literature lies not in individual studies, but in the best available evidence within the entire body of evidence. In many fields, including dentistry, systematic reviews, or SRs, have become the preferred method of analyzing and interpreting large amounts of data toward developing clinical practice guidelines.

METHODS

The American Academy of Periodontology, or AAP, formulated clinically relevant, focused questions and developed a protocol for SRs. Reviewers systematically searched online databases and print journals and contacted authors, journal editors and industry experts. For each included study, the reviewers determined the level of evidence and summarized the findings. Centralized management of biostatistics provided consistency. At a structured conference, the reviews were the basis for development of consensus reports that included implications for practice and research.

RESULTS

The SRs provided comprehensive analyses of the best available clinically relevant evidence in key areas of periodontal practice. The reviews also identified knowledge gaps and suggested direction for future studies. The conference focused on translating the findings from the SRs into general consensus statements that described scientific and clinical assessments and implications for research and practice.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Consensus statements based on SRs are important linchpins of modern dentistry. They aid in the development of appropriate treatment protocols for specific clinical circumstances. These protocols, in turn, help ensure the integration of clinically relevant scientific evidence with the expertise of individual clinicians, along with the unique characteristics, needs and wants of individual patients.

Microbial Identification in the Management of Periodontal Diseases. A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Our understanding of the complexity of the oral microbiota continues to improve as new technologies, such as the analysis of 16S rRNA bacterial genes, are utilized. Despite the difficult of cataloguing all microorganisms and determining their pathogenic potential, some species, mostly members of the resident oral microbiota, have been identified as likely periodontal pathogens. However, for microbial diagnosis to be of value, it needs to affect disease diagnosis and/or treatment planning as well as result in superior treatment outcomes and/or provide an economic benefit to the patient.

RATIONALE

The purposes of this systematic review were to determine if microbial identification influences periodontal patient management and whether treatment outcomes are better compared to patients whose treatment plans are developed without this information.

FOCUSED QUESTION

In patients with periodontal diseases, does microbial identification influence patient management compared to treatment prescribed without this information?

SEARCH PROTOCOL

The MEDLINE database was searched for clinical studies in English from 1991 through 2002 by 2 investigators. Hand searches were performed on the Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Periodontology, Journal of Periodontal Research, Oral Microbiology and Immunology, and Periodontology 2000. In addition, directors of diagnostic laboratories were contacted about unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Articles in which bacterial identification influenced patient treatment were preferred as were those reporting longitudinal data demonstrating a direct relationship between the presence or absence of certain bacteria and subsequent alterations in clinical variables. Because of the limited number of studies, all articles, including case reports, were considered.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Review articles without original data were excluded, although references were examined for possible inclusion. Articles reporting data showing associations between certain microorganisms and disease or health that did not affect treatment were excluded. Clinical trials testing antibacterial agents for their ability to enhance mechanical debridement were not included since bacterial identification had little effect on drug selection or experimental group assignment. Articles dealing with implants rather than natural teeth were omitted. DATA ANALYSIS AND COLLECTION: The heterogeneity of the published data precludes any meaningful pooling of data or meta-analysis. The pertinent literature, including relevant variables of plaque, gingivitis, and bleeding on probing scores; probing depth; clinical attachment level; number of lost teeth; and microbial changes; and patient-centered outcomes including decrease in morbidity, reduced need for surgery, and duration and cost of treatment are summarized.

MAIN RESULTS

1. There was a lack of articles with a high evidence rating; most pertinent articles were either case reports or case series without controls. 2. Because reports were heterogeneous regarding study design, patient selection, and data collection, meta-analysis was not feasible and results are summarized in tabular format. 3. This report is based on a total of 24 studies, representing a total patient population of approximately 835. 4. Thirteen studies reported on microbiological identification as an aid in treatment planning. 5. Eleven studies reported a differential clinical response depending on the detection or lack of detection of specific organisms.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

1. The published material suggests that microbiological monitoring may be useful in management of selected patients who do not respond to standard therapy. 2. Some practitioners consider microbial identification a valuable adjunct to managing patients with certain forms of periodontitis, although there is a lack of strong evidence to this effect. 3. Additional research is needed to address this issue.

The Use of the Evidence-Based Approach in a Periodontal Therapy Contemporary Science Workshop

BACKGROUND

When appropriately evaluated and carefully managed, the integration of emerging technology into practice can improve health and enhance the quality of life. Since the last American Academy of Periodontology Workshop in 1996, great technological advances in the areas of data access, retrieval, and management have been made. The World Wide Web has "exploded" with great possibilities for gathering data from many sources. Evaluation methods such as meta-analysis and modeling have likewise improved, permitting a more objective and useful assessment of the retrieved information. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how the evidence-based (EB) approach was used to plan and implement a consensus conference on periodontal therapy, the Workshop on Contemporary Science in Clinical Periodontics.

RATIONALE

The methodologies and philosophies associated with the EB approach provided the ideal framework for assessing the applicability of the newest clinical research to patient therapy.

METHODS

Evidence-based systematic reviews on 15 topics associated with contemporary clinical periodontal practice were conducted prior to the Workshop. High standards of scientific rigor and scholarly ideals were stressed throughout the process. At the highly structured conference the reviews served as the basis for development of consensus reports that include implications for practice and research. MATERIAL COVERED: 1. The rationale, design, and implementation of a conference on contemporary clinical periodontics using an evidence-based approach. 2. Data management, clinical versus statistical significance, and the challenges of technology transfer and dissemination. 3. The benefits and limitations of using the EB approach in a consensus conference.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus statements resulting from the conference should serve to augment clinical decision-making, research priorities, education, and reimbursement. The evidence-based approach removed much of the subjectivity traditionally associated with classical reviews of the literature and allowed participants to focus on substantive issues.