Montelukast, a leukotriene-receptor antagonist, for the treatment of mild asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

New perspectives for asthma treatment: anti-leukotriene drugs

Leukotrienes are synthesized by different cells, including eosinophils, neutrophils, basophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, and mast cells. Cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4) are the most important leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of asthma. Pharmacologically, there are two different ways of blocking the action of leukotrienes: inhibiting their production by blocking 5-lipoxygenase or its activating protein, 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (FLAP), (inhibitors) or by blocking their receptors (antagonists). The available antagonists are, for the moment, directed against the one receptor demonstrated to play a role in asthma symptoms, CysLT1, and they act in a competitive way. The only marketed 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor is zileuton (Zyflo). CysLT1 antagonists, currently on the pharmaceutical market in some countries, are zafirlukast (Accolate), pranlukast (Ultair, Onon), and montelukast (Singulair). Undoubtedly, drugs acting on leukotrienes constitute a new pharmacologic class in the therapeutic armamentarium for the management of asthma. From the pediatric point of view, montelukast is currently the most interesting drug of the group to date because of published trials in patients as young as 6 yr of age. At present, zafirlukast is only approved for use in patients 12 yr of age and older, although we understand that applications are likely to extend the age range into childhood shortly. However, more experience is necessary to establish a definite place for both leukotrienes in the step-by-step asthma treatment. New comparative studies (with sodium cromoglycate and inhaled steroids), which will probably be published in the near future, as well as studies on the use of montelukast in the treatment of children under 6 yr of age will add crucial information to our knowledge, and help to identify an appropriate use in the therapeutic algorithm. Montelukast will not be a substitute for inhaled corticosteroids or beta-agonists, although it may act as a 'sparing drug' (which might help tapering of steroids in some instances). Its role in exercise-induced asthma seems promising. Although its more widespread use could highlight low-frequency adverse effects, its apparent excellent tolerability is an additional advantage for the drug. Patients' preference for a twice-daily dosage over the inhaled medication, resulting in a better compliance, is relatively well established, at least for zafirlukast in adults, and these findings can probably be extended to montelukast, which only requires once-daily dosing in children.

Leukotriene (LT)-receptor antagonist is more effective in asthmatic patients with a low baseline ratio of urinary LTE4 to 2,3-dinor-6-keto-prostaglandin (PG)F1alpha

BACKGROUND

To test the hypothesis that urinary levels of arachidonic acid metabolites may be a predicting factor of the effects of pranlukast, a selective leukotriene (LT) antagonist, on chronic adult asthma, we investigated the relationship between its clinical efficacy and urinary eicosanoid levels.

METHODS

An open, multicenter trial was conducted involving 38 stable moderate and severe asthmatic patients (mean percent predicted FEV1 was 71%). All patients received pranlukast (225 mg twice daily) for 4 weeks after a 2-week run-in period. Urinary levels of LTE4, 11-dehydro-thromboxane (TX) B2, 2,3-dinor-6-keto-prostaglandin (PG) F1alpha, and creatinine were measured in 3-h urine collected on day 1 of the treatment. The responder was defined by an improvement of asthma symptom scores and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).

RESULTS

One patient was excluded because of an adverse effect, nausea. Thirteen out of 37 subjects were responders and 24 were nonresponders. There were no significant differences in patients' backgrounds and urinary arachidonate levels between the two groups. The urinary LTE4 to 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1alpha ratio in the responder was significantly lower (P=0.01) than that in the nonresponder. In all patients, a significant inverse correlation was revealed between the baseline urinary LTE4/2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1alpha ratio and the improvement of PEFR in the morning (r=-0.43, P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggested that the urinary ratio of LTE4 to 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1alpha might be one of the predictive markers of the clinical efficacy of this LT-receptor antagonist in asthmatic subjects.

Therapeutic advances: leukotriene antagonists for the treatment of asthma

Asthma is the most common respiratory disease encountered in clinical practice, affecting both children and adults. It is an important cause of respiratory morbidity and mortality. Recent therapeutic developments have shown that leukotrienes are the most potent and important inflammatory mediators in the pathology of both acute and chronic asthma. They cause increased bronchoconstriction, mucous secretion, and vascular permeability. Studies using compounds that block leukotrienes (receptor antagonists - montelukast and zafirlukast and 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors - zileuton) have demonstrated improved asthma control in patients aged 12 years and older. In this article we assess the therapeutic importance of these new compounds.

Leukotriene-receptor antagonists

Leukotriene-receptor antagonists are the first novel class of antiasthma drugs to become available over the past three decades. They have an unique profile in that they are a hybrid of an anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator drug, and they can be taken as a tablet once or twice daily. The published data with leukotriene-receptor antagonists such as montelukast or zafirlukast show good antiasthmatic activity over a wide spectrum of asthma severity either as monotherapy or with inhaled steroids. Another potential spin-off of leukotriene-receptor antagonists is that they also seem to be effective in treating allergic rhinitis, which commonly coexists in patients with asthma. Here I overview the clinical pharmacology of leukotriene antagonists and appraise the published data from clinical trials, and look at the appropriate position of these agents in asthma management guidelines.

Exercise-induced asthma: diagnosis and treatment for the recreational or elite athlete

Exercise-induced asthma: diagnosis and treatment for the recreational or elite athlete. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 31, No. 1 (Suppl.), pp. S33-S38, 1999. Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) is found in 10-50% of recreational and elite athletes, depending on the population studied. The diagnosis may be made with symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness, etc. with exercise) and with pulmonary function measurements (spirometry or peak flow measurements) before and after exercise. Most patients respond well to pre-exercise treatment with an inhaled quick-acting beta agonist. Some patients require additional therapy such as pre-exercise inhaled cromolyn, daily inhaled steroids, salmeterol, theophylline, leukotriene modifiers, or other agents. An occasional patient presents with the symptoms of EIA but responds poorly to treatment. Further investigation may lead to a totally different diagnosis such as vocal cord dysfunction. For most athletes with EIA, proper diagnosis and treatment will allow them to complete at any level.

Physical activity and asthma

The relationship between asthma and exercise and the resultant disability (ie, the impact on activities of daily living, including physical activity) shows wide interpatient and intrapatient variability, being influenced not only by the disease but additional psychosocial variables. There are a variety of helpful pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures in dealing with simple exercise-induced asthma, and new therapeutic options are being developed. The cardiorespiratory performance characteristics of asthmatic patients are very frequently suboptimal, either because of symptom-limited exercise tolerance or secondary deconditioning consequent upon inactivity. Medically supervised physical training can produce significant beneficial change. Recommendations for rehabilitation of asthmatic patients would include individualized exercise prescription and advice based on objective criteria of exercise capability, with flexibility in the programs offered, in order to cater to the broadest spectrum of patient disability.

Leukotriene modifiers as novel therapeutics in asthma

After years of research, the components of slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis have been identified as the cysteinyl leukotrienes C4, D4, and E4. Leukotrienes are now known to be important mediators of chronic asthma. Leukotrienes cause bronchoconstriction, oedema, and mucus secretion in models of asthma and are produced in excess quantities in asthmatic patients. Leukotriene receptor antagonists and biosynthesis inhibitors have been produced to improve the signs and symptoms of asthma. These agents block laboratory challenges simulating chronic asthma such as exercise, allergen, and aspirin challenge. They also are effective in studies of chronic asthma in a wide variety of patient types demonstrating that leukotrienes are indeed important mediators of asthma. Over the next several years the appropriate place in asthma therapy for these new agents will be defined.

Montelukast once daily inhibits exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind, multicenter, 2-period crossover study. Children (n = 27) with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) > or =70% of the predicted value and a fall in FEV1 > or =20% after exercise on 2 occasions. Patients received montelukast (5-mg chewable tablet) or placebo once daily in the evening for 2 days in crossover fashion (at least 4 days between treatment periods). Standardized exercise challenges were performed 20 to 24 hours after the last dose in each period. End points included area above the postexercise percent fall in FEV1 versus time curve (AAC0-60 min), maximum percent fall in FEV1 from pre-exercise baseline, and time to recovery of FEV1 to within 5% of pre-exercise baseline.

RESULTS

Montelukast significantly reduced AAC0-60 min (265 vs 590% x min for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P < or = .05; approximately 59% protection relative to placebo) and the maximum percent fall (18% vs 26% for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P < or = .05). Montelukast treatment resulted in a shorter time to recovery (18 vs 28 minutes for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P = .079).

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast attenuates EIB at the end of the dosing interval in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma.