1
|
Rashid Z, Munir MM, Woldesenbet S, Khalil M, Katayama E, Khan MMM, Endo Y, Altaf A, Tsai S, Dillhoff M, Pawlik TM. Association of preoperative cholangitis with outcomes and expenditures among patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:1137-1144. [PMID: 38762337 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to characterize the association of preoperative acute cholangitis (PAC) with surgical outcomes and healthcare costs. METHODS Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between 2013 and 2021 were identified using 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files. PAC was defined as the occurrence of at least 1 episode of acute cholangitis within the year preceding surgery. Multivariable regression analyses were used to compare postoperative outcomes and costs relative to PAC. RESULTS Among 23,455 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent PD, 2,217 patients (9.5%) had at least 1 episode of PAC. Most patients (n = 14,729 [62.8%]) underwent PD for a malignant indication. On multivariable analyses, PAC was associated with elevated odds of surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29), sepsis (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.37), extended length of stay (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26), and readmission within 90 days (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.26). Patients with a history of PAC before PD had a reduced likelihood of achieving a postoperative textbook outcome (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.92) along with 87.8% and 18.4% higher associated preoperative and postoperative healthcare costs, respectively (all P < .001). Overall costs increased substantially among patients with more than 1 PAC episode ($59,893 [95% CI, $57,827-$61,959] for no episode vs $77,922 [95% CI, $73,854-$81,990] for 1 episode vs $101,205 [95% CI, $94,871-$107,539] for multiple episodes). CONCLUSION Approximately 1 in 10 patients undergoing PD experienced an antecedent PAC episode, which was associated with adverse surgical outcomes and greater healthcare expenditures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zayed Rashid
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Selamawit Woldesenbet
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Mujtaba Khalil
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Erryk Katayama
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi Khan
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Abdullah Altaf
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Susan Tsai
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herbach EL, Curran M, Roberson ML, Carnahan RM, McDowell BD, Wang K, Lizarraga I, Nash SH, Charlton M. Guideline-concordant breast cancer care by patient race and ethnicity accounting for individual-, facility- and area-level characteristics: a SEER-Medicare study. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:1017-1031. [PMID: 38546924 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01859-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine racial-ethnic variation in adherence to established quality metrics (NCCN guidelines and ASCO quality metrics) for breast cancer, accounting for individual-, facility-, and area-level factors. METHODS Data from women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at 66+ years of age from 2000 to 2017 were examined using SEER-Medicare. Associations between race and ethnicity and guideline-concordant diagnostics, locoregional treatment, systemic therapy, documented stage, and oncologist encounters were estimated using multilevel logistic regression models to account for clustering within facilities or counties. RESULTS Black and American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) women had consistently lower odds of guideline-recommended care than non-Hispanic White (NHW) women (Diagnostic workup: ORBlack 0.83 (0.79-0.88), ORAIAN 0.66 (0.54-0.81); known stage: ORBlack 0.87 (0.80-0.94), ORAIAN 0.63 (0.47-0.85); seeing an oncologist: ORBlack 0.75 (0.71-0.79), ORAIAN 0.60 (0.47-0.72); locoregional treatment: ORBlack 0.80 (0.76-0.84), ORAIAN 0.84 (0.68-1.02); systemic therapies: ORBlack 0.90 (0.83-0.98), ORAIAN 0.66 (0.48-0.91)). Commission on Cancer accreditation and facility volume were significantly associated with higher odds of guideline-concordant diagnostics, stage, oncologist visits, and systemic therapy. Black residential segregation was associated with significantly lower odds of guideline-concordant locoregional treatment and systemic therapy. Rurality and area SES were associated with significantly lower odds of guideline-concordant diagnostics and oncologist visits. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to examine guideline-concordance across the continuum of breast cancer care from diagnosis to treatment initiation. Disparities were present from the diagnostic phase and persisted throughout the clinical course. Facility and area characteristics may facilitate or pose barriers to guideline-adherent treatment and warrant future investigation as mediators of racial-ethnic disparities in breast cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L Herbach
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Michaela Curran
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mya L Roberson
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ryan M Carnahan
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Bradley D McDowell
- University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Ingrid Lizarraga
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Sarah H Nash
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mary Charlton
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Herbach EL, Nash SH, Lizarraga IM, Carnahan RM, Wang K, Ogilvie AC, Curran M, Charlton ME. Patterns of Evidence-Based Care for the Diagnosis, Staging, and First-line Treatment of Breast Cancer by Race-Ethnicity: A SEER-Medicare Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1312-1322. [PMID: 37436422 PMCID: PMC10592343 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial and ethnic disparities in guideline-recommended breast cancer treatment are well documented, however studies including diagnostic and staging procedures necessary to determine treatment indications are lacking. The purpose of this study was to characterize patterns in delivery of evidence-based services for the diagnosis, clinical workup, and first-line treatment of breast cancer by race-ethnicity. METHODS SEER-Medicare data were used to identify women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2000 and 2017 at age 66 or older (n = 2,15,605). Evidence-based services included diagnostic procedures (diagnostic mammography and breast biopsy), clinical workup (stage and grade determination, lymph node biopsy, and HR and HER2 status determination), and treatment initiation (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and HER2-targeted therapy). Poisson regression was used to estimate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each service. RESULTS Black and American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) women had significantly lower rates of evidence-based care across the continuum from diagnostics through first-line treatment compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. AIAN women had the lowest rates of HER2-targeted therapy and hormone therapy initiation. While Black women also had lower initiation of HER2-targeted therapy than NHW, differences in hormone therapy were not observed. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest patterns along the continuum of care from diagnostic procedures to treatment initiation may differ across race-ethnicity groups. IMPACT Efforts to improve delivery of guideline-concordant treatment and mitigate racial-ethnic disparities in healthcare and survival should include procedures performed as part of the diagnosis, clinical workup, and staging processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L Herbach
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Sarah H Nash
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Ingrid M Lizarraga
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Ryan M Carnahan
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Amy C Ogilvie
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Michaela Curran
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Mary E Charlton
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doose M, Verhoeven D, Sanchez JI, McGee-Avila JK, Chollette V, Weaver SJ. Clinical Multiteam System Composition and Complexity Among Newly Diagnosed Early-Stage Breast, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A SEER-Medicare Analysis. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e33-e42. [PMID: 36473151 PMCID: PMC10166428 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Sixty percent of adults have multiple chronic conditions at cancer diagnosis. These patients may require a multidisciplinary clinical team-of-teams, or a multiteam system (MTS), of high-complexity involving multiple specialists and primary care, who, ideally, coordinate clinical responsibilities, share information, and align clinical decisions to ensure comprehensive care needs are managed. However, insights examining MTS composition and complexity among individuals with cancer and comorbidities at diagnosis using US population-level data are limited. METHODS Using SEER-Medicare data (2006-2016), we identified newly diagnosed patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer who had a codiagnosis of cardiopulmonary disease and/or diabetes (n = 75,201). Zaccaro's theory-based classification of MTSs was used to categorize clinical MTS complexity in the 4 months following cancer diagnosis: high-complexity (≥ 4 clinicians from ≥ 2 specialties) and low-complexity (1-3 clinicians from 1-2 specialties). We describe the proportions of patients with different MTS compositions and quantify the incidence of high-complexity MTS care by patient groups. RESULTS The most common MTS composition was oncology with primary care (37%). Half (50.3%) received high-complexity MTS care. The incidence of high-complexity MTS care for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients with cancer was 6.7% (95% CI, -8.0 to -5.3) and 4.7% (95% CI, -6.3 to -3.0) lower than non-Hispanic White patients with cancer; 13.1% (95% CI, -14.1 to -12.2) lower for rural residents compared with urban; 10.4% (95% CI, -11.2 to -9.5) lower for dual Medicaid-Medicare beneficiaries compared with Medicare-only; and 16.6% (95% CI, -17.5 to -15.8) lower for colorectal compared with breast cancer. CONCLUSION Incidence differences of high-complexity MTS care were observed among cancer patients with multiple chronic conditions from underserved populations. The results highlight the need to further understand the effects of and mechanisms through which care team composition, complexity, and functioning affect care quality and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Doose
- Division of Clinical and Health Services Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD
| | - Dana Verhoeven
- Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Janeth I Sanchez
- Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Jennifer K McGee-Avila
- Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
- Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Veronica Chollette
- Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Sallie J Weaver
- Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Balan N, Braschi C, Kirkland P, Kaji AH, Chen KT. The Impact of Primary Care Physicians on the Surgical Presentation and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in Vulnerable Populations. Am Surg 2022; 88:2596-2601. [PMID: 35703089 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221109474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple socioeconomic and clinical factors have been implicated in the health disparities that exist amongst vulnerable populations with colorectal cancer. Efforts have been directed toward addressing these factors to improve outcomes. We evaluate the impact of primary care physicians (PCP) on the surgical presentation and outcomes of colorectal cancer at a safety-net hospital. METHODS A retrospective chart review of 331 patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2020 at a single-institution urban county medical center. RESULTS The cohort was predominantly male (59%) and Hispanic (52.1%). Thirty-two percent of patients had a PCP at time of diagnosis. Patients with PCPs compared to those without PCPs had significantly lower rates of acute presentation (perforation or obstruction) (17.0 vs 38.1%, P < .001), higher rates of surgical resection (83.0 vs 70.7%, P = .016), and were less likely to have metastatic disease at presentation (20.4 vs 33.5%, P = .02). Overall, having a PCP also improved probability of survival (HR 1.36, P < .04). CONCLUSION Having a PCP at the time of colorectal cancer diagnosis is associated with improved outcomes in a safety-net population, with significant differences in surgical presentation and resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Balan
- Department of Surgery, 21640Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Caitlyn Braschi
- Department of Surgery, 21640Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Kirkland
- Department of Surgery, 21640Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Amy H Kaji
- Department of Emergency Medicine, 21640Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn T Chen
- Department of Surgery, 21640Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Murphy KA, Daumit GL, McGinty EE, Stone EM, Kennedy-Hendricks A. Predictors of cancer screening among Black and White Maryland Medicaid enrollees with serious mental illness. Psychooncology 2021; 30:2092-2098. [PMID: 34541733 PMCID: PMC8665102 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is the second leading cause of death for people with serious mental illness (SMI), such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. People with SMI receive cancer screenings at lower rates than the general population. AIMS We sought to identify factors associated with cancer screening in a publicly insured population with SMI and stratified by race, a factor itself linked with differential rates of cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used Maryland Medicaid administrative claims data (2010-2018) to examine screening rates for cervical cancer (N = 40,622), breast cancer (N = 9818), colorectal cancer (N = 19,306), and prostate cancer (N = 4887) among eligible Black and white enrollees with SMI. We examined individual-level socio-demographic and clinical factors, including co-occurring substance use disorder, medical comorbidities, psychiatric diagnosis, obstetric-gynecologic and primary care utilization, as well as county-level characteristics, including metropolitan status, mean household income, and primary care workforce capacity. Generalized estimating equations with a logit link were used to examine the characteristics associated with cancer screening. RESULTS Compared with white enrollees, Black enrollees were more likely to receive screening for cervical cancer (AOR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.15-1.22), breast cancer (AOR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.19-1.36), and colorectal cancer (AOR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), while similar rates were observed for prostate cancer screening (AOR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.96-1.18). Primary care utilization and longer Medicaid enrollment were positively associated with cancer screening while co-occurring substance use disorder was negatively associated with cancer screening. CONCLUSION Improving cancer screening rates among populations with SMI should focus on facilitating continuous insurance coverage and access to primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karly A. Murphy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
| | - Gail L. Daumit
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| | - Emma E. McGinty
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| | - Elizabeth M. Stone
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alyabsi M, Meza J, Islam KMM, Soliman A, Watanabe-Galloway S. Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake: Differences Between Rural and Urban Privately-Insured Population. Front Public Health 2020; 8:532950. [PMID: 33330301 PMCID: PMC7710856 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.532950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Earlier studies investigated rural-urban colorectal cancer (CRC) screening disparities among older adults or used surveys. The objective was to compare screening uptake between rural and urban individuals 50–64 years of age using private health insurance. Data were analyzed from 58,774 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska beneficiaries. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between rural-urban and CRC screening use. Results indicate that rural individuals were 56% more likely to use the Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) compared with urban residents, but rural females were 68% less likely to use FOBT. Individuals with few Primary Care Physician (PCP) visits and rural-women are the least to receive screening. To enhance CRC screening, a policy should be devised for the training and placement of female PCP in rural areas. In particular, multilevel interventions, including education, more resources, and policies to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening, are needed. Further research is warranted to investigate barriers to CRC screening in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mesnad Alyabsi
- Population Health Research Section, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jane Meza
- Department of Biostatistics, Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - K M Monirul Islam
- Department of Epidemiology, Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Amr Soliman
- Community Health and Social Medicine, City University of New York School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway
- Department of Epidemiology, Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McDermott JD, Eguchi M, Morgan R, Amini A, Goddard JA, Borrayo EA, Karam SD. Elderly Black Non-Hispanic Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer Have the Worst Survival Outcomes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 19:57-67. [PMID: 32987364 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this population study, we compared head and neck cancer (HNC) prognosis and risk factors in 2 underserved minority groups (Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic patients) with those in other racial/ethnicity groups. METHODS In this SEER-Medicare database study in patients with HNC diagnosed in 2006 through 2015, we evaluated cancer-specific survival (CSS) between different racial/ethnic cohorts as the main outcome. Patient demographics, tumor factors, socioeconomic status, and treatments were analyzed in relation to the primary outcomes between racial/ethnic groups. RESULTS Black non-Hispanic patients had significantly worse CSS than all other racial/ethnic groups, including Hispanic patients, in unadjusted univariate analysis (Black non-Hispanic patients: hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.33-1.65; Hispanic patients: hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.99-1.28). To investigate the association of several variables with CSS, data were stratified for multivariate analysis using forward Cox regression. This identified socioeconomic status, cancer stage, and receipt of treatment as predictive factors for the survival differences. Black non-Hispanic patients were most likely to present at a later stage (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.38-1.90) and to receive less treatment (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.81). Unmarried status, high poverty areas, increased emergency department visits, and receipt of healthcare at non-NCI/nonteaching hospitals also significantly impacted stage and treatment. CONCLUSIONS Black non-Hispanic patients have a worse HNC prognosis than patients in all other racial/ethnic groups, including Hispanic patients. Modifiable risk factors include access to nonemergent care and prevention measures, such as tobacco cessation; presence of social support; communication barriers; and access to tertiary centers for appropriate treatment of their cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan Eguchi
- Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, and
| | - Rustain Morgan
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, California; and
| | | | | | - Sana D Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McGee-Avila JK, Doose M, Nova J, Kumar R, Stroup AM, Tsui J. Patterns of HIV testing among women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer in the New Jersey Medicaid Program. Cancer Causes Control 2020; 31:931-941. [PMID: 32803402 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-020-01333-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Practice-based guidelines recommend HIV testing during initial invasive cervical cancer (ICC) workup. Determinants of HIV testing during diagnosis of AIDS-defining cancers in vulnerable populations, where risk for HIV infection is higher, are under-explored. METHODS We examine factors associated with patterns of HIV testing among Medicaid enrollees diagnosed with ICC. Using linked data from the New Jersey State Cancer Registry and New Jersey Medicaid claims and enrollment files, we evaluated HIV testing among 242 ICC cases diagnosed from 2012 to 2014 in ages 21-64 at (a) any point during Medicaid enrollment (2011-2014) and (b) during cancer workup 6 months pre ICC diagnosis to 6 months post ICC diagnosis. Logistic regression models identified factors associated with HIV testing. RESULTS Overall, 13% of women had a claim for HIV testing during ICC workup. Two-thirds (68%) of women did not have a claim for HIV testing (non-receipt of HIV testing) while enrolled in Medicaid. Hispanic/NH-API/Other women had lower odds of non-receipt of HIV testing compared with NH-Whites (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.17-0.94). Higher odds of non-receipt of HIV testing were observed among cases with no STI testing (OR: 4.92; 95% CI 2.27-10.67) and < 1 year of Medicaid enrollment (OR: 3.07; 95% CI 1.14- 8.26) after adjusting for other factors. CONCLUSIONS Few women had HIV testing claims during ICC workup. Opportunities for optimal ICC care are informed by knowledge of HIV status. Further research should explore if lack of HIV testing claims during ICC workup is an accurate indicator of ICC care, and if so, to assess testing barriers during workup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K McGee-Avila
- School of Nursing, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA
- François-Xavier Bagnoud Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Michelle Doose
- School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jose Nova
- Center for State Health Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Rizie Kumar
- Department of Sociology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Antoinette M Stroup
- School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- New Jersey State Cancer Registry, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Jennifer Tsui
- School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
- Center for State Health Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Erickson SM, Outland B, Joy S, Rockwern B, Serchen J, Mire RD, Goldman JM. Envisioning a Better U.S. Health Care System for All: Health Care Delivery and Payment System Reforms. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172:S33-S49. [PMID: 31958802 DOI: 10.7326/m19-2407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The American College of Physicians (ACP) has long advocated for universal access to high-quality health care in the United States. Yet, it is essential that the U.S. health system goes beyond ensuring coverage, efficient delivery systems, and affordability. Fundamental restructuring of payment policies and delivery systems is required to achieve a health care system that puts patients' interests first and supports physicians and their care teams to deliver high-value, patient- and family-centered care. The ACP calls for reform of U.S. payment, delivery, and information technology systems to achieve this vision. The ACP's recommendations include increased investment in primary care; alignment of financial incentives to achieve better patient outcomes, lower costs, reduce inequities in health care, and facilitate team-based care; freeing patients and physicians of inefficient administrative and billing tasks and documentation requirements; and development of health information technologies that enhance the patient-physician relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shari M Erickson
- American College of Physicians, Washington, DC (S.M.E., B.O., S.J., B.R., J.S.)
| | - Brian Outland
- American College of Physicians, Washington, DC (S.M.E., B.O., S.J., B.R., J.S.)
| | - Suzanne Joy
- American College of Physicians, Washington, DC (S.M.E., B.O., S.J., B.R., J.S.)
| | - Brooke Rockwern
- American College of Physicians, Washington, DC (S.M.E., B.O., S.J., B.R., J.S.)
| | - Josh Serchen
- American College of Physicians, Washington, DC (S.M.E., B.O., S.J., B.R., J.S.)
| | - Ryan D Mire
- Heritage Medical Associates, Nashville, Tennessee (R.D.M.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gorey KM, Bartfay E, Kanjeekal SM, Wright FC, Hamm C, Luginaah IN, Zou G, Holowaty EJ, Richter NL, Balagurusamy MK. Palliative chemotherapy among people living in poverty with metastasised colon cancer: facilitation by primary care and health insurance. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019; 9:e24. [PMID: 27554266 PMCID: PMC5357141 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2015] [Revised: 07/17/2016] [Accepted: 08/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many Americans with metastasised colon cancer do not receive indicated palliative chemotherapy. We examined the effects of health insurance and physician supplies on such chemotherapy in California. METHODS We analysed registry data for 1199 people with metastasised colon cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 and followed for 1 year. We obtained data on health insurance, census tract-based socioeconomic status and county-level physician supplies. Poor neighbourhoods were oversampled and the criterion was receipt of chemotherapy. Effects were described with rate ratios (RR) and tested with logistic regression models. RESULTS Palliative chemotherapy was received by less than half of the participants (45%). Facilitating effects of primary care (RR=1.23) and health insurance (RR=1.14) as well as an impeding effect of specialised care (RR=0.86) were observed. Primary care physician (PCP) supply took precedence. Adjusting for poverty, PCP supply was the only significant and strong predictor of chemotherapy (OR=1.62, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.56). The threshold for this primary care advantage was realised in communities with 8.5 or more PCPs per 10 000 inhabitants. Only 10% of participants lived in such well-supplied communities. CONCLUSIONS This study's observations of facilitating effects of primary care and health insurance on palliative chemotherapy for metastasised colon cancer clearly suggested a way to maximise Affordable Care Act (ACA) protections. Strengthening America's system of primary care will probably be the best way to ensure that the ACA's full benefits are realised. Such would go a long way towards facilitating access to palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Gorey
- School of Social Work, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emma Bartfay
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sindu M Kanjeekal
- Department of Oncology, Windsor Regional Cancer Center and Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frances C Wright
- Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Departments of Surgery and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caroline Hamm
- Department of Oncology, Windsor Regional Cancer Center and Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Isaac N Luginaah
- Department of Geography, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Guangyong Zou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric J Holowaty
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy L Richter
- School of Social Work, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
GPs' perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients: an exploratory qualitative study from a Dutch context. BJGP Open 2019; 3:bjgpopen18X101631. [PMID: 31049411 PMCID: PMC6480863 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In the Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme, individuals receive a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to do at home. After a positive FIT result, a follow-up colonoscopy is recommended to identify CRC or advanced adenomas (AA). GPs may influence their patients’ decisions on adherence to follow-up by colonoscopy. Aim To explore GPs’ perspectives on the CRC screening programme and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients to follow up with the recommended colonoscopy. Design & setting Semi-structured interviews among GPs in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Method GPs were approached using purposive sampling. Analysis was performed on 11 interviews using open coding and constant comparison. Results All interviewed GPs would recommend FIT-positive patients without obvious contraindications to adhere to a follow-up colonoscopy. If patients were likely to be distressed by a positive FIT result, most GPs described using reassurance strategies emphasising a low cancer probability. Most GPs stressed the probability of false-positive FIT results. Some described taking a positive screening result in CRC screening less seriously than one in breast cancer screening. Most GPs underestimated CRC and AA probabilities after a positive FIT result. When told the actual probabilities, some stated that this knowledge might change the way they would inform patients. Conclusion These results imply that some of the interviewed GPs have too low a perception of the risk associated with a positive FIT result, which might influence their patients’ decision-making. Simply informing GPs about the actual rates of CRC and AA found in the screening programme might improve this risk perception.
Collapse
|
13
|
Tsui J, DeLia D, Stroup AM, Nova J, Kulkarni A, Ferrante JM, Cantor JC. Association of Medicaid enrollee characteristics and primary care utilization with cancer outcomes for the period spanning Medicaid expansion in New Jersey. Cancer 2018; 125:1330-1340. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Tsui
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey
- School of Public Health Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey Piscataway New Jersey
| | - Derek DeLia
- MedStar Health Research Institute Hyattsville Maryland
| | - Antoinette M. Stroup
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey
- School of Public Health Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey Piscataway New Jersey
- New Jersey State Cancer Registry New Jersey Department of Health Trenton New Jersey
| | - Jose Nova
- Center for State Health Policy Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey
| | - Aishwarya Kulkarni
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey
- New Jersey State Cancer Registry New Jersey Department of Health Trenton New Jersey
| | - Jeanne M. Ferrante
- Department of Family Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey
| | - Joel C. Cantor
- Center for State Health Policy Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Glass DP, Kanter MH, Jacobsen SJ, Minardi PM. The impact of improving access to primary care. J Eval Clin Pract 2017; 23:1451-1458. [PMID: 28984018 PMCID: PMC5765488 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To measure the size and timing of changes in utilization and costs for employees and dependents who had major access barriers to primary care removed, across an 8-year period (2007 to 2014). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Retrospective observational study examining patterns of utilization and costs before and after the implementation of a worksite medical office in 2010. The worksite office offered convenient primary care services with no travel from work, essentially guaranteed same day access, and no co-pay. Trends in visit rates and costs were compared for an intervention fixed cohort group (employees and dependents) at the employer (n = 1211) with a control fixed cohort group (n = 542 162) for 6 types of visits (primary, urgent, emergency, inpatient, specialty, and other outpatient). Difference-in-differences methods assessed the significance of between-group changes in utilization and costs. RESULTS The worksite medical office intervention group had an increase in primary care visits relative to the control group (+43% vs +4%, P < 0.001). This was accompanied by a reduction in urgent care visits by the intervention group compared with the control group (-43% vs -5%, P < 0.001). There were no differences in the other types of visits, and the total visit costs for the intervention group increased 5.7% versus 2.7% for the control group (P = 0.008). A sub-group analysis of the intervention group (comparing dependents to employees) found that that the dependents achieved a reduction in costs of 2.7% (P < 0.001) across the study period. CONCLUSIONS The potential for long-term reduction in utilization and costs with better access to primary care is significant, but not easily nor automatically achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Glass
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Michael H Kanter
- The Permanente Federation and Associate Dean of the Medical School, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Steven J Jacobsen
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, CA, USA
| | - Paul M Minardi
- Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brousselle A, Breton M, Benhadj L, Tremblay D, Provost S, Roberge D, Pineault R, Tousignant P. Explaining time elapsed prior to cancer diagnosis: patients' perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:448. [PMID: 28659143 PMCID: PMC5490154 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2390-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer is the leading cause of death in Canada. Early cancer diagnosis could improve patients’ prognosis and quality of life. This study aimed to analyze the factors influencing elapsed time between the first help-seeking trigger and cancer diagnosis with respect to the three most common and deadliest cancer types: lung, breast, and colorectal. Methods This paper presents the qualitative component of a larger project based on a sequential explanatory design. Twenty-two patients diagnosed were interviewed, between 2011 to 2013, in oncology clinics of four hospitals in the two most populous regions in Quebec (Canada). Transcripts were analyzed using the Model of Pathways to Treatment. Results Pre-diagnosis elapsed time and phases are difficult to appraise precisely and vary according to cancer sites and symptoms specificity. This observation makes the Model of Pathways to Treatment challenging to use to analyze patients’ experiences. Analyses identified factors contributing to elapsed time that are linked to type of cancer, to patients, and to health system organization. Conclusions This research allowed us to identify avenues for reducing the intervals between first symptoms and cancer diagnosis. The existence of inequities in access to diagnostic services, even in a universal healthcare system, was highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Brousselle
- Département des Sciences de la Santé Communautaire, Centre de recherche - Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles LeMoyne bureau 200, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Mylaine Breton
- Département des Sciences de la Santé Communautaire, Centre de recherche - Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles LeMoyne bureau 200, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Dominique Tremblay
- École des Sciences Infirmières, Centre de recherche - Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sylvie Provost
- Direction de Santé Publique de Montréal, Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Danièle Roberge
- Département des Sciences de la Santé Communautaire, Centre de recherche - Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles LeMoyne bureau 200, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Raynald Pineault
- Direction de Santé Publique de Montréal, Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Institut National de Santé Publique, Montreal, Canada
| | - Pierre Tousignant
- Direction de Santé Publique de Montréal, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Institut National de Santé Publique, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dawson G, Crane M, Lyons C, Burnham A, Bowman T, Perez D, Travaglia J. General practitioners' perceptions of population based bowel screening and their influence on practice: a qualitative study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2017; 18:36. [PMID: 28298185 PMCID: PMC5353863 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-017-0610-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Background Although largely preventable, Australia has one of the highest rates of bowel cancer in the world. General Practitioners (GPs) have an important role to play in prevention and early detection of bowel cancer, however in Australia this is yet to be optimised and participation remains low. This study sought to understand how GPs’ perceptions of bowel screening influence their attitudes to, and promotion of the faecal occult blood test (FOBT), to identify opportunities to enhance their role. Methods Interviews were conducted with 31 GPs from metropolitan and regional New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Discussions canvassed GPs’ perceptions of their role in bowel screening and the national screening program; perceptions of screening tests; practices regarding discussing screening with patients; and views on opportunities to enhance their role. Transcripts were coded using Nvivo and thematically analysed. Results The study revealed GPs’ perceptions of screening did not always align with broader public health definitions of ‘population screening’. While many GPs reportedly understood the purpose of population screening, notions of the role of asymptomatic screening for bowel cancer prevention were more limited. Descriptions of screening centred on two major uses: the use of a screening ‘process’ to identify individual patients at higher risk; and the use of screening ‘tools’, including the FOBT, to aid diagnosis. While the FOBT was perceived as useful for identifying patients requiring follow up, GPs expressed concerns about its reliability. Colonoscopy by comparison, was considered by many as the gold standard for both screening and diagnosis. This perception reflects a conceptualisation of the screening process and associated tools as an individualised method for risk assessment and diagnosis, rather than a public health strategy for prevention of bowel cancer. Conclusion The results show that GPs’ perceptions of screening do not always align with broader public health definitions of ‘population screening’. Furthermore, the way GPs understood screening was shown to impact their clinical practice, influencing their preferences for, and use of ‘screening’ tools such as FOBT. The findings suggest emphasising the preventative opportunity of FOBT screening would be beneficial, as would formally engaging GPs in the promotion of bowel screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greer Dawson
- Sax Institute, Level 13, Building 10, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, Australia, 2007. .,School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Samuels Building, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2052.
| | - Melanie Crane
- Prevention Research Collaboration, The Charles Perkins Centre, Level 6, The Hub, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2006
| | - Claudine Lyons
- NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, 52 Martin Place, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2000
| | - Anna Burnham
- Cancer Institute NSW, Australian Technology Park, Level 9, 8 Central Avenue, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2015
| | - Tara Bowman
- Cancer Institute NSW, Australian Technology Park, Level 9, 8 Central Avenue, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2015
| | - Donna Perez
- Cancer Institute NSW, Australian Technology Park, Level 9, 8 Central Avenue, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2015
| | - Joanne Travaglia
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Level 7, 235 Jones Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2007
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rust G, Zhang S, Yu Z, Caplan L, Jain S, Ayer T, McRoy L, Levine RS. Counties eliminating racial disparities in colorectal cancer mortality. Cancer 2016; 122:1735-48. [PMID: 26969874 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Revised: 12/31/2015] [Accepted: 01/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rates are declining, racial-ethnic disparities in CRC mortality nationally are widening. Herein, the authors attempted to identify county-level variations in this pattern, and to characterize counties with improving disparity trends. METHODS The authors examined 20-year trends in US county-level black-white disparities in CRC age-adjusted mortality rates during the study period between 1989 and 2010. Using a mixed linear model, counties were grouped into mutually exclusive patterns of black-white racial disparity trends in age-adjusted CRC mortality across 20 three-year rolling average data points. County-level characteristics from census data and from the Area Health Resources File were normalized and entered into a principal component analysis. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to test the relation between these factors (clusters of related contextual variables) and the disparity trend pattern group for each county. RESULTS Counties were grouped into 4 disparity trend pattern groups: 1) persistent disparity (parallel black and white trend lines); 2) diverging (widening disparity); 3) sustained equality; and 4) converging (moving from disparate outcomes toward equality). The initial principal component analysis clustered the 82 independent variables into a smaller number of components, 6 of which explained 47% of the county-level variation in disparity trend patterns. CONCLUSIONS County-level variation in social determinants, health care workforce, and health systems all were found to contribute to variations in cancer mortality disparity trend patterns from 1990 through 2010. Counties sustaining equality over time or moving from disparities to equality in cancer mortality suggest that disparities are not inevitable, and provide hope that more communities can achieve optimal and equitable cancer outcomes for all. Cancer 2016;122:1735-48. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Rust
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL.,Department of Community Health And Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Shun Zhang
- Statistics and Methodology Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Zhongyuan Yu
- School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey
| | - Lee Caplan
- Deparment of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sanjay Jain
- Department of Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Turgay Ayer
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Luceta McRoy
- School of Business and Management, Southern Adventist University, Collegedale, Tennessee
| | - Robert S Levine
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gorey KM, Kanjeekal SM, Wright FC, Hamm C, Luginaah IN, Bartfay E, Zou G, Holowaty EJ, Richter NL. Colon cancer care and survival: income and insurance are more predictive in the USA, community primary care physician supply more so in Canada. Int J Equity Health 2015; 14:109. [PMID: 26511360 PMCID: PMC4625439 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-015-0246-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2015] [Accepted: 10/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our research group advanced a health insurance theory to explain Canada's cancer care advantages over America. The late Barbara Starfield theorized that Canada's greater primary care-orientation also plays a critically protective role. We tested the resultant Starfield-Gorey theory by examining the effects of poverty, health insurance and physician supplies, primary care and specialists, on colon cancer care in Ontario and California. METHODS We analyzed registry data for people with non-metastasized colon cancer from Ontario (n = 2,060) and California (n = 4,574) diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 and followed to 2010. We obtained census tract-based socioeconomic data from population censuses and data on county-level physician supplies from national repositories: primary care physicians, gastroenterologists and other specialists. High poverty neighborhoods were oversampled and the criterion was 10 year survival. Hypotheses were explored with standardized rate ratios (RR) and tested with logistic regression models. RESULTS Significant inverse associations of poverty (RR = 0.79) and inadequate health insurance (RR = 0.80) with survival were observed in the California, while they were non-significant or non-existent in Ontario. The direct associations of primary care physician (RRs of 1.32 versus 1.11) and gastroenterologist (RRs of 1.56 versus 1.15) supplies with survival were both stronger in Ontario than California. The supply of primary care physicians took precedence. Probably mediated through the initial course of treatment, it largely explained the Canadian advantage. CONCLUSIONS Poverty and health insurance were more predictive in the USA, community physician supplies more so in Canada. Canada's primary care protections were greatest among the most socioeconomically vulnerable. The protective effects of Canadian health care prior to enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) clearly suggested the following. Notwithstanding the importance of insuring all, strengthening America's system of primary care will probably be the best way to ensure that the ACA's full benefits are realized. Finally, Canada's strong primary care system ought to be maintained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Gorey
- School of Social Work, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4, Canada.
| | - Sindu M Kanjeekal
- Department of Oncology, Windsor Regional Cancer Center and Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Frances C Wright
- Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center and cross appointed Departments of Surgery and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Caroline Hamm
- Department of Oncology, Windsor Regional Cancer Center and Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Isaac N Luginaah
- Department of Geography, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Emma Bartfay
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Guangyong Zou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Eric J Holowaty
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Nancy L Richter
- School of Social Work, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Enard KR, Nevarez L, Hernandez M, Hovick SR, Moguel MR, Hajek RA, Blinka CE, Jones LA, Torres-Vigil I. Patient navigation to increase colorectal cancer screening among Latino Medicare enrollees: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Causes Control 2015; 26:1351-9. [PMID: 26109462 PMCID: PMC5215648 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-015-0620-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2014] [Accepted: 06/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Latino Medicare enrollees report suboptimal rates of colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) despite Medicare policies designed to improve CRCS access for older persons. Patient navigation (PN) may address many underlying barriers to CRCS, yet little is known about the effectiveness of PN to increase CRCS adherence among Latino Medicare enrollees. METHODS Using a randomized controlled trial study design, we evaluated tailored PN delivered outside of primary care settings as an intervention to increase CRCS adherence in this population. Intervention participants (n = 135) received tailored PN services which included education, counseling, and logistical support administered in their language of choice. Comparison participants (n = 168) received mailed cancer education materials. We compared CRCS rates between interventions and used multivariable logistic regression to assess the odds of CRCS adherence for PN versus comparison groups after adjusting for covariates of interest. RESULTS More navigated than non-navigated participants became CRCS adherent during the study period (43.7 vs. 32.1%, p = 0.04). The odds of CRCS adherence were significantly higher for PN relative to comparison participants before and after adjusting for covariates (unadjusted OR 1.64, p = 0.04; adjusted OR 1.82, p = 0.02). Higher CRCS adherence rates were observed primarily in the uptake of endoscopic screening methods. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that PN delivered outside of the primary care environment is modestly effective in increasing CRCS adherence among Latino Medicare enrollees. This intervention strategy should be further evaluated as a complement to primary care-based PN and other care coordination strategies to increase adherence with CRCS and other evidence-based screenings among older Latinos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K R Enard
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Ave, Room 380, Saint Louis, MO, 63104, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Adams KF, Johnson EA, Chubak J, Kamineni A, Doubeni CA, Buist DSM, Williams AE, Weinmann S, Doria-Rose VP, Rutter CM. Development of an Algorithm to Classify Colonoscopy Indication from Coded Health Care Data. EGEMS 2015; 3:1171. [PMID: 26290883 PMCID: PMC4537082 DOI: 10.13063/2327-9214.1171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Electronic health data are potentially valuable resources for evaluating colonoscopy screening utilization and effectiveness. The ability to distinguish screening colonoscopies from exams performed for other purposes is critical for research that examines factors related to screening uptake and adherence, and the impact of screening on patient outcomes, but distinguishing between these indications in secondary health data proves challenging. The objective of this study is to develop a new and more accurate algorithm for identification of screening colonoscopies using electronic health data. Methods: Data from a case-control study of colorectal cancer with adjudicated colonoscopy indication was used to develop logistic regression-based algorithms. The proposed algorithms predict the probability that a colonoscopy was indicated for screening, with variables selected for inclusion in the models using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Results: The algorithms had excellent classification accuracy in internal validation. The primary, restricted model had AUC= 0.94, sensitivity=0.91, and specificity=0.82. The secondary, extended model had AUC=0.96, sensitivity=0.88, and specificity=0.90. Discussion: The LASSO approach enabled estimation of parsimonious algorithms that identified screening colonoscopies with high accuracy in our study population. External validation is needed to replicate these results and to explore the performance of these algorithms in other settings.
Collapse
|
21
|
Sankaranarayanan J, Qiu F, Watanabe-Galloway S. A registry study of the association of patient's residence and age with colorectal cancer survival. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014; 14:301-13. [PMID: 24625041 DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2014.891441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Because of limited literature from rural states of the United States like Nebraska, we evaluated the association of patient's age, Office of Management and Budget residence-county categories (rural-nonmetro, micropolitan-nonmetro, urban), and significant interactions between confounding-variables with colorectal cancer (CRC) survival. This retrospective 1998-2003 study of 6561 CRC patients from the Nebraska Cancer Registry showed median patient survival in colon and rectal cancer in urban, rural and micropolitan counties were 33, 36, and 46 months and 41, 47, 49 months, respectively. In Cox proportional-hazards analyses, after adjusting for significant demographics (age, race, marital status in colon cancer; age, insurance status in rectal cancer), cancer stage, surgery and radiation treatments; 1) no-chemotherapy urban colon cancer patients had significantly shorter survival (rural vs urban; adjusted hazard ratio, HR: 0.78 or urban vs rural HR: 1.28; micropolitan vs urban, HR: 0.78) and 2) no-surgery urban (vs rural, HR: 1.49); micropolitan (vs rural, HR: 2.01) rectal cancer patients had significantly shorter survival. Colon cancer (≥65 years) and rectal cancer (≥75 years) elderly each versus patients aged 19-64 years old had significantly shorter survival (all p < 0.01). The association of patients' age and treatment/residence-county interactions with CRC survival warrant decision-makers' attention.
Collapse
|
22
|
Nadash P. A transitional care model for low-income older adults does not reduce readmission rates or emergency department visits during care transitions. Evid Based Nurs 2014; 17:98. [PMID: 23999194 DOI: 10.1136/eb-2013-101508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Nadash
- Department of Gerontology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Byun JY, Yoon SJ, Oh IH, Kim YA, Seo HY, Lee YH. Economic burden of colorectal cancer in Korea. J Prev Med Public Health 2014; 47:84-93. [PMID: 24744825 PMCID: PMC3988286 DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.2014.47.2.84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2012] [Accepted: 01/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The incidence and survival rate of colorectal cancer in Korea are increasing because of improved screening, treatment technologies, and lifestyle changes. In this aging population, increases in economic cost result. This study was conducted to estimate the economic burden of colorectal cancer utilizing claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. METHODS Economic burdens of colorectal cancer were estimated using prevalence data and patients were defined as those who received ambulatory treatment from medical institutions or who had been hospitalized due to colorectal cancer under the International Classification of Disease 10th revision codes from C18-C21. The economic burdens of colorectal cancer were calculated as direct costs and indirect costs. RESULTS The prevalence rate (per 100 000 people) of those who were treated for colorectal cancer during 2010 was 165.48. The economic burdens of colorectal cancer in 2010 were 3 trillion and 100 billion Korean won (KRW), respectively. Direct costs included 1 trillion and 960 billion KRW (62.85%), respectively and indirect costs were 1 trillion and 160 billion (37.15%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Colorectal cancer has a large economic burden. Efforts should be made to reduce the economic burden of the disease through primary and secondary prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju-Young Byun
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Jun Yoon
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In-Hwan Oh
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Ae Kim
- Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Young Seo
- Graduate School of Public Health, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yo-Han Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Roetzheim RG, Lee JH, Ferrante JM, Gonzalez EC, Chen R, Fisher KJ, Love-Jackson K, McCarthy EP. The influence of dermatologist and primary care physician visits on melanoma outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Board Fam Med 2013; 26:637-47. [PMID: 24204060 PMCID: PMC4671079 DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.06.130042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ambulatory visits to dermatologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) may improve melanoma outcomes through early detection. We sought to measure the effect of dermatologist and PCP visits on melanoma stage at diagnosis and mortality. METHODS We used data from the database linking Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) and Medicare data (1994 to 2005) to examine patterns of dermatologist and PCP ambulatory visits before diagnosis for 18,884 Medicare beneficiaries with invasive melanoma or unknown stage at diagnosis. Visits were assessed during the 2-year time interval before the month of diagnosis. We examined whether dermatologist and PCP visits were associated with diagnosis of thinner melanomas (defined as local stage tumors having Breslow thickness <1 mm) and lower melanoma mortality. RESULTS Medicare beneficiaries visiting both a dermatologist and PCP before diagnosis had greater odds of diagnosis of a thin melanoma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.41) and lower melanoma mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.76) compared with those without such visits. The mortality findings were attenuated once stage at diagnosis was adjusted for in the multivariable model. CONCLUSION Improved melanoma outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries may depend on adequate access and use of dermatologist and PCP services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard G Roetzheim
- the Department of Family Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL; the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ; the Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Trenton, NJ; and the Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ferrante JM, Lee JH, McCarthy EP, Fisher KJ, Chen R, Gonzalez EC, Love-Jackson K, Roetzheim RG. Primary care utilization and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159:437-446. [PMID: 24081284 PMCID: PMC4605549 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-7-201310010-00003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Utilization of primary care may decrease colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and death through greater receipt of CRC screening tests. OBJECTIVE To examine the association of primary care utilization with CRC incidence, CRC deaths, and all-cause mortality. DESIGN Population-based, case-control study. SETTING Medicare program. PARTICIPANTS Persons aged 67 to 85 years diagnosed with CRC between 1994 and 2005 in U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) regions matched with control patients (n = 205,804 for CRC incidence, 54,160 for CRC mortality, and 121,070 for all-cause mortality). MEASUREMENTS Primary care visits in the 4- to 27-month period before CRC diagnosis, CRC incidence, CRC mortality, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS Compared with persons having 0 or 1 primary care visit, persons with 5 to 10 visits had lower CRC incidence (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.94 [95% CI, 0.91 to 0.96]) and mortality (adjusted OR, 0.78 [CI, 0.75 to 0.82]) and lower all-cause mortality (adjusted OR, 0.79 [CI, 0.76 to 0.82]). Associations were stronger in patients with late-stage CRC diagnosis, distal lesions, and diagnosis in more recent years when there was greater Medicare screening coverage. Ever receipt of CRC screening and polypectomy mediated the association of primary care utilization with CRC incidence. LIMITATION This study used administrative data, which made it difficult to identify potential confounders and prevented examination of the content of primary care visits. CONCLUSION Medicare beneficiaries with higher utilization of primary care have lower CRC incidence and mortality and lower overall mortality. Increasing and promoting access to primary care in the United States for Medicare beneficiaries may help decrease the national burden of CRC. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ren Chen
- University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fisher KJ, Lee JH, Ferrante JM, McCarthy EP, Gonzalez EC, Chen R, Love-Jackson K, Roetzheim RG. The effects of primary care on breast cancer mortality and incidence among Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer 2013; 119:2964-72. [PMID: 23677482 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2013] [Revised: 04/05/2013] [Accepted: 04/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care physician (PCP) services may have an impact on breast cancer mortality and incidence, possibly through greater use of screening mammography. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective, 1:1 matching case-control study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked database to examine use of PCP services and their association with breast cancer mortality and incidence. SEER cases representing the 3 outcomes of interest (breast cancer mortality, all-cause mortality among women diagnosed with breast cancer, and breast cancer incidence) were matched to unaffected controls from the 5% Medicare random sample. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine associations between physician visits and breast cancer outcomes while controlling for other covariates. RESULTS Women who had 2 or more PCP visits during the 24-month assessment interval had lower odds of breast cancer mortality, all-cause mortality, and late-stage breast cancer diagnosis compared with women who had no PCP visits or 1 PCP visit while adjusting for other covariates, including mammography and non-PCP visits. Women who had 5 to 10 PCP visits had 0.69 times the odds of breast cancer mortality (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.75), 0.83 times the odds of death from any cause having been diagnosed with breast cancer (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.87), and 0.67 times the odds of a late-stage breast cancer diagnosis (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.73) compared with those who had no PCP visits or 1 PCP visit. CONCLUSIONS The current findings suggest that PCPs play an important role in reducing breast cancer mortality among the Medicare population. Further research is needed to better understand the impact of primary care on breast cancer and other cancers that are amendable to prevention or early detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate J Fisher
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mosen DM, Feldstein AC, Perrin N, Rosales AG, Smith DH, Liles EG, Schneider JL, Myers RE, Elston-Lafata J. More comprehensive discussion of CRC screening associated with higher screening. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE 2013; 19:265-271. [PMID: 23725359 PMCID: PMC3891849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Examine association of comprehensiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening discussion by primary care physicians (PCPs) with completion of CRC screening. STUDY DESIGN Observational study in Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a group-model health maintenance organization. METHODS A total of 883 participants overdue for CRC screening received an automated telephone call (ATC) between April and June 2009 encouraging CRC screening. Between January and March 2010, participants completed a survey on PCPs' discussion of CRC screening and patient beliefs regarding screening. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE receipt of CRC screening (assessed by electronic medical record [EMR], 9 months after ATC). Primary independent variable: comprehensiveness of CRC screening discussion by PCPs (7-item scale). Secondary independent variables: perceived benefits of screening (4-item scale assessing respondents' agreement with benefits of timely screening) and primary care utilization (EMR; 9 months after ATC). The independent association of variables with CRC screening was assessed with logistic regression. RESULTS Average scores for comprehensiveness of CRC discussion and perceived benefits were 0.4 (range 0-1) and 4.0 (range 1-5), respectively. A total of 28.2% (n = 249) completed screening, 84% of whom had survey assessments after their screening date. Of screeners, 95.2% completed the fecal immunochemical test. More comprehensive discussion of CRC screening was associated with increased screening (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-2.21). Higher perceived benefits (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.13-1.90) and 1 or more PCP visits (OR = 5.82, 95% CI = 3.87-8.74) were also associated with increased screening. CONCLUSIONS More comprehensive discussion of CRC screening was independently associated with increased CRC screening. Primary care utilization was even more strongly associated with CRC screening, irrespective of discussion of CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. Mosen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Adrianne C. Feldstein
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
- Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nancy Perrin
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - David H. Smith
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Elizabeth G. Liles
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
- Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Ronald E. Myers
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer Elston-Lafata
- Department of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Goldsbury D, Harris M, Pascoe S, Barton M, Olver I, Spigelman A, Beilby J, Veitch C, Weller D, O'Connell DL. The varying role of the GP in the pathway between colonoscopy and surgery for colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2013; 3:bmjopen-2012-002325. [PMID: 23471608 PMCID: PMC3612745 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe general practitioner (GP) involvement in the treatment referral pathway for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. DESIGN A retrospective cohort analysis of linked data. SETTING A population-based sample of CRC patients diagnosed from August 2004 to December 2007 in New South Wales, Australia, using the 45 and Up Study, cancer registry diagnosis records, inpatient hospital records and Medicare claims records. PARTICIPANTS 407 CRC patients who had a colonoscopy followed by surgery. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Patterns of GP consultations between colonoscopy and surgery (ie, between diagnosis and treatment). We investigated whether consulting a GP presurgery was associated with time to surgery, postsurgical GP consultations or rectal cancer cases having surgery in a centre with radiotherapy facilities. RESULTS Of the 407 patients, 43% (n=175) had at least one GP consultation between colonoscopy and surgery. The median time from colonoscopy to surgery was 27 days for those with an intervening GP consultation and 15 days for those without the consultation. 55% (n=223) had a GP consultation up to 30 days postsurgery; it was more common in cases of patients who consulted a GP presurgery than for those who did not (65% and 47%, respectively, adjusted OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.50 to 4.89, p=0.001). Of the 142 rectal cancer cases, 23% (n=33) had their surgery in a centre with radiotherapy facilities, with no difference between those who did and did not consult a GP presurgery (21% and 25% respectively, adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.63, p=0.76). CONCLUSIONS Consulting a GP between colonoscopy and surgery was associated with a longer interval between diagnosis and treatment, and with further GP consultations postsurgery, but for rectal cancer cases it was not associated with treatment in a centre with radiotherapy facilities. GPs might require a more defined and systematic approach to CRC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Goldsbury
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Harris
- UNSW Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shane Pascoe
- UNSW Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Barton
- Liverpool Health Service, Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allan Spigelman
- UNSW St Vincent's Clinical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justin Beilby
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Craig Veitch
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Weller
- Centre for Population Health Services, University of Edinburgh,Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Dianne L O'Connell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review concerns quality assurance for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, especially colonoscopy and will emphasize research and guidelines published since January 2011. Important articles from previous years have been included for background. RECENT FINDINGS Critical lapses in endoscope processing and administration of intravenous sedation alerted us to the infection risk of endoscopy. Increases in cost of colonoscopy, evidence for overuse and studies demonstrating missed cancers have led some to question the value of endoscopy. Despite these setbacks, the National Polyp Study (NPS) consortium published their long-term follow-up of the original NPS patients and confirmed that colonoscopy with polyp removal can reduce the risk of colorectal cancer for an extended period. In this article, we will focus on ways to improve the value of outpatient colonoscopy. SUMMARY The United States national quality improvement agenda recently became organized into a more coordinated effort spearheaded by several public and private entities. They comprise the infrastructure by which performance measures are developed and implemented as accountability standards. Understanding wherein a gastroenterology (GI) practice fits into this infrastructure and learning ways we can improve our endoscopic practice is important for physicians who provide this vital service to patients. This article will provide a roadmap for developing a quality assurance program for endoscopic practice.
Collapse
|
30
|
Roetzheim RG, Ferrante JM, Lee JH, Chen R, Love-Jackson KM, Gonzalez EC, Fisher KJ, McCarthy EP. Influence of primary care on breast cancer outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10:401-11. [PMID: 22966103 PMCID: PMC3438207 DOI: 10.1370/afm.1398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to explore the association between primary care and breast cancer outcomes. METHODS Using a retrospective cohort study of 105,105 female Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of breast cancer in SEER registries during the years 1994-2005, we examined the total number of office visits to primary care physicians and non-primary care physicians in a 24-month period before cancer diagnosis. For women with invasive cancers, we examined the odds of diagnosis of late-stage disease, according to the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) (stages III and IV vs stages I and II), and survival (breast cancer specific and all cause) using logistic regression and proportional hazards models, respectively. We also explored whether including noninvasive cancers, such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), would alter results and whether prior mammography was a potential mediator of associations. RESULTS Primary care physician visits were associated with improved breast cancer outcomes, including greater use of mammography, reduced odds of late-stage diagnosis, and lower breast cancer and overall mortality. Prior mammography (and resultant earlier stage diagnosis) mediated these associations in part, but not completely. Similar results were seen for non-primary care physician visits. Results were similar when women with DCIS were included in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer had better outcomes if they made greater use of a primary care physician's ambulatory services. These findings suggest adequate primary medical care may be an important factor in achieving optimal breast cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard G Roetzheim
- Department of Family Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|