Cardiovascular Outcomes of Calcium-Free vs Calcium-Based Phosphate Binders in Patients 65 Years or Older With End-stage Renal Disease Requiring Hemodialysis

Calcium-based phosphate binders and bone mineral density in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Calcium supplements are commonly prescribed to prevent fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Nonetheless, they are generally eschewed in hemodialysis patients because they increase vascular calcification and induce cardiovascular disease. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effect of calcium-based phosphate binders (CBPB) on bone mineral density (BMD) in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Outpatients on dialysis who underwent BMD measurement from January to December 2017, whose data on BMD trends and CBPB administration were recorded over the next 4 years, were enrolled. Patients receiving anti-osteoporotic medications were excluded. The association between the presence and duration of CBPB administration and changes in BMD was evaluated.

RESULTS

The femoral neck's BMD decreased from 0.836 g/cm2 (0.702-0.952) to 0.764 g/cm2 (0.636-0.896) (P < 0.001) in the non-CBPB group (patients who never received CBPB over 4 years, n = 32). The CBPB group (n = 56) exhibited only a minute decrease from 0.833 g/cm2 (0.736-0.965) to 0.824 g/cm2 (0.706-0.939) (P = 0.004). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed better BMD maintenance in the CBPB group [β-coefficient (95% CI): 0.033 (0.001-0.065); P = 0.046] than in the non-CBPB group. Additionally, the prolonged-CBPB administration group showed superior BMD preservation [β-coefficient (95% CI): 0.038 (0.001-0.076); P = 0.042].

CONCLUSION

CBPB administration may be associated with BMD maintenance.

The impact of accessibility to non-calcium-based phosphate binders and calcimimetics on mineral outcomes in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: A 10-year retrospective analysis of real-world data

INTRODUCTION

Hyperphosphatemia and hyperparathyroidism are common in end-stage kidney disease and are associated with poor outcomes. In addition to adequate dialysis, medications are usually required for optimum control of serum phosphate and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. The use of calcium-based phosphate binders (CBPBs) and active vitamin D is associated with an increase in serum calcium and worsening vascular calcification. To overcome these limitations, non-calcium-based phosphate binders (NCBPBs) and calcimimetics have been developed. However, the coverage for these new medications remains limited in several parts of the world due to the lack of patient-level outcome data and cost. The present study examined the differences in mineral outcomes between two main categories of healthcare programs that provided different coverage for medications used to control mineral and bone disorders (MBD). The Social Security/Universal Coverage (SS/UC) program covered only CBPBs and active vitamin D, whereas the Civil Servant/State Enterprise (CS/SE) program provided coverage of CBPBs, active vitamin D, NCBPBs, and calcimimetics.

METHODS

This 10-year retrospective cohort study examined the differences in mineral outcomes between two healthcare programs in maintenance hemodialysis patients. The differences in serum calcium, phosphate, and PTH levels, as well as the aortic arch calcification score, were analyzed according to dialysis vintage by linear mixed-effects regression analyses. The difference in the composite outcome of severe hyperparathyroidism and parathyroidectomy was analyzed by the Cox-proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

714 patients were included in the analyses (full cohort). Of these patients, 563 required at least one type of medication to control MBD (MBD medication subgroup). Serum calcium, phosphate, and the proportions of patients with hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were substantially higher in the SS/UC group compared with the CS/SE group after appropriate adjustments for confounders in both the full cohort and the MBD medication subgroup. These findings were confirmed in propensity-score matched analyses. Higher parathyroid hormone levels and a higher rate of the composite endpoint of severe hyperparathyroidism and parathyroidectomy were also observed in the SS/UC group. A more rapid progression of aortic arch calcification was suggested in the SS/UC group, but between-group changes were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients under the healthcare program that did not cover the use of NCBPBs and calcimimetics showed higher serum calcium and phosphate levels and a more rapid progression of hyperparathyroidism. The difference in the progression of vascular calcification could not be confirmed in the present study.

Association of Sevelamer Initiation with Gastrointestinal Bleeding Hospitalization in Individuals Requiring Hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

Case reports have suggested a causative role between sevelamer use and subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), but no large observational studies have evaluated this association.

METHODS

Using the United States Renal Data System database from 2015 to 2019, we examined the association between initiation of sevelamer (vs. non-sevelamer containing phosphate binders) and GIB hospitalization as well as all-cause mortality among individuals on hemodialysis. We emulated a target trial using Cox regression models and inverse probability of treatment weights to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) across outcomes and subgroups.

RESULTS

Among 21,354 new users of phosphate binders (11,276 sevelamer and 10,078 non-sevelamer) with baseline lab data (calcium, phosphorus, hemoglobin, and albumin), there were 2,811 GIB hospitalizations and 5,920 deaths after a median follow-up of 1.3 years. Compared with the initiation of non-sevelamer binders, sevelamer was not associated with an increased risk of GIB hospitalization (89 vs. 90 events per 1,000 person-years; IPTW-HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.91-1.06) or all-cause mortality (220 vs. 224 events per 1,000 person-years; IPTW-HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.03). Subgroup analyses (such as diabetes and anti-coagulation use) were generally consistent, and there was no association between sevelamer dose and GIB hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Among patients requiring hemodialysis, sevelamer (vs. non-sevelamer) containing phosphate binders was not associated with increased risk of GIB hospitalization.

Handling time-varying treatments in observational studies: A scoping review and recommendations

OBJECTIVE

Time-varying treatments are common in observational studies. However, when assessing treatment effects, the methodological framework has not been systematically established for handling time-varying treatments. This study aimed to examine the current methods for dealing with time-varying treatments in observational studies and developed practical recommendations.

METHODS

We searched PubMed from 2000 to 2021 for methodological articles about time-varying treatments, and qualitatively summarized the current methods for handling time-varying treatments. Subsequently, we developed practical recommendations through interactive internal group discussions and consensus by a panel of external experts.

RESULTS

Of the 36 eligible reports (22 methodological reviews, 10 original studies, 2 tutorials and 2 commentaries), most examined statistical methods for time-varying treatments, and only a few discussed the overarching methodological process. Generally, there were three methodological components to handle time-varying treatments. These included the specification of treatment which may be categorized as three scenarios (i.e., time-independent treatment, static treatment regime, or dynamic treatment regime); definition of treatment status which could involve three approaches (i.e., intention-to-treat, per-protocol, or as-treated approach); and selection of analytic methods. Based on the review results, a methodological workflow and a set of practical recommendations were proposed through two consensus meetings.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus process for assessing treatment effects in observational studies with time-varying treatments. Previous efforts were dedicated to developing statistical methods. Our study proposed a stepwise workflow with practical recommendations to assist the practice.

Abdominal aortic calcification score can predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Purpose: Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) assessed by using standard lateral lumbar radiographs can be graded, and composite summary scores (range, 0-24) have been shown to be highly predictive of subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, few studies have sought to determine the optimal AAC score cutoff values for the prediction of mortality among HD patients.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 408 hemodialysis patients. AAC severity was quantified by the AAC score, which was measured by lateral lumbar radiography with complete follow-up data from January 2015 to December 2021. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to find the cutoff AAC value for the prediction of mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.Results: The cutoff calcification score for the prediction of mortality was 4.5 (sensitivity, 67.3%; specificity, 70.4%). The patients with AAC scores above 4.5 had significantly higher all-cause (log-rank p < 0.001) and cardiovascular (log-rank p < 0.001) mortality rates than those with AAC scores below 4.5. In the multivariate regression analyses, an AAC score above 4.5 was a significant factor associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 2.079, p = 0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 2.610, p < 0.001).Conclusions: AAC is a reliable aortic calcification marker. HD patients with an AAC score > 4.5 have significantly elevated all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared with those with an AAC score ≤ 4.5. AAC was a better predictor than cardiac valve calcification for mortality in HD patients.

Can we reverse arterial stiffness by intervening on CKD-MBD biomarkers?

The increased cardiovascular risk of chronic kidney disease may in part be the consequence of arterial stiffness, a typical feature of kidney failure. Deranged homeostasis of minerals and hormones involved (CKD-MBD), are also strongly associated with this increased risk. It is well established that CKD-MBD is a main driver of vascular calcification, which in turn worsens arterial stiffness. However, there are other contributors to arterial stiffness in CKD than calcification. An overlooked possibility is that CKD-MBD may have detrimental effects on this potentially better modifiable component of arterial stiffness. In this review, the individual contributions of short-term changes in calcium, phosphate, PTH, vitamin D, magnesium, and FGF23 to arterial stiffness, in most studies assessed as pulse wave velocity, is summarized. Indeed, there is evidence from both observational studies and interventional trials that higher calcium concentrations can worsen arterial stiffness. This, however, has not been shown for phosphate, and it seems unlikely that, apart from being a contributor to vascular calcification and having effects on the microcirculation, phosphate has no acute effect on large artery stiffness. Several interventional studies, both by infusing PTH and by abrupt lowering PTH by calcimimetics or surgery, virtually ruled out direct effects on large artery stiffness. A well-designed trial using both active and nutritional vitamin D as intervention found a beneficial effect for the latter. Unfortunately, the study had a baseline imbalance and other studies did not support its finding. Both magnesium and FGF23 do not seem do modify central arterial stiffness.

A Perfluorocarbon-Coated ZrP Cation Exchanger with Excellent Ammonium Selectivity and Chemical Stability: An Oral Sorbent for End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD)

An oral sorbent to remove NH₄⁺ within the small intestine of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients could reduce blood urea levels and diminish their dialysis treatment burden. But current sorbent materials like amorphous zirconium phosphate particles Zr(HPO₄)₂·H₂O (ZrP) lack the selectivity to remove NH₄⁺ in water solution with other competing ions. Our previous work found that a gas-permeable, hydrophobic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coating on ZrP improved the material's selectivity for NH₄⁺. However, a competing ion Ca²⁺ was still removed by PDMS-coated ZrP sorbent, and the permeability of the PDMS coating to Ca²⁺ was increased after low-pH stomach-like condition exposure. An alternative hydrophobic and gas permeable coating has been investigated─perfluorooctyltriethoxysilane (FOTS). The coating was attached in place of PDMS to a tetraethyl orthosilicate-coated ZrP surface. Surface atomic composition analysis and scanning electron microscopy observation verified the successful application of the FOTS coating. Water contact angle analysis validated the FOTS coating was hydrophobic (145.0 ± 3.2°). In vitro competing ion studies indicated the FOTS coating attached to ZrP increased NH₄⁺ removal by 53% versus uncoated ZrP. FOTS offers complete selectivity for NH₄⁺ over Ca²⁺ with similar NH₄⁺ capacity as the previous PDMS coating. Moreover, FOTS-coated ZrP maintained NH₄⁺ removal capacity and selectivity after the acid exposure study, indicating excellent acid resistance while NH₄⁺ selectivity of ZrP-PDMS decreased by 72%. The results suggested that FOTS-coated ZrP is promising as an oral sorbent for ESKD patients.

Lanthanum masquerading as foreign body ingestion in a critically ill patient with end-stage renal disease

PURPOSE

Medication use may affect imaging results. In this case study, we report a case of lanthanum ingestion resulting in imaging consistent with ingested metallic foreign bodies.

SUMMARY

Hyperphosphatemia affects most patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is associated with morbidity and mortality. Lanthanum carbonate reduces daily phosphate absorption and is indicated as a non-calcium-based phosphate binder in patients with ESRD. A 58-year-old man with a medical history of stage 5 chronic kidney disease was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for hyperkalemia and acute respiratory failure after a missed dialysis session. He required vasopressors, intubation, and continuous renal replacement therapy. Admission imaging demonstrated several ingested metallic foreign bodies within the colon. There was consideration of colorectal surgery and gastroenterology consultation. On the initial medication reconciliation, no medications that would have the radiographic appearance of ingested metallic foreign bodies were identified. On further review of prescription data available through the electronic medical record, it was noted that the patient had recently filled a prescription for lanthanum despite its apparent discontinuation on a previous admission. After interviewing the patient's wife, it was confirmed that the patient had continued taking lanthanum and that he was swallowing it whole and not chewing it. No consultations or interventions were performed, and the metallic foreign bodies were no longer present on further imaging after a period of 35 days.

CONCLUSION

Escalation of care was avoided in this patient due to the performance of diligent medication reconciliation and recognition of the impact of lanthanum ingestion on imaging.

Effects of alfacalcidol on cardiovascular outcomes according to alkaline phosphatase levels in the J-DAVID trial

In the Japan Dialysis Active Vitamin D (J-DAVID) trial, oral alfacalcidol numerically, but not significantly, increased the risk of cardiovascular events among patients undergoing hemodialysis. Because the cardiovascular effect of alfacalcidol could be modulated by bone turnover status, this post-hoc analysis of the J-DAVID examined how alkaline phosphatase (ALP), a more precise marker of bone turnover than parathyroid hormone (PTH), modifies the impact of alfacalcidol. The J-DAVID was a 48-month, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing oral alfacalcidol with no vitamin D receptor activators use in terms of cardiovascular events among 976 hemodialysis patients without secondary hyperparathyroidism. This post-hoc analysis included 959 patients with available data on baseline ALP. The median [25–75th percentile] baseline ALP level was 234 [183–296] U/L. In a Cox proportional hazards model, ALP did not significantly modify the effect of alfacalcidol on the rate of cardiovascular events or all-cause death (P for effect modification = 0.54 and 0.74, respectively). The effect of alfacalcidol on time-series changes in calcium, phosphate, and intact PTH were similar across ALP subgroups. In conclusion, oral alfacalcidol did not significantly affect cardiovascular outcomes irrespective of bone turnover status.

Non calcium phosphate binders - Is there any evidence of benefit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Low-level evidence and opinion-based clinical practice guidelines highlight the substantial uncertainty in the practice patterns of hyperphosphatemia management in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This manuscript reviews the evidence for the choice of phosphate binders and its impact on clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Phosphate binders are among the most common medications prescribed for patients on dialysis. Clinical practice guidelines recommend lowering phosphate levels toward normal range and restricting calcium-based binders in all CKD patients. There is substantial gap in the evidence underlying these recommendations with lack of any placebo-controlled, randomized trials showing survival benefits for any class of phosphate-binders. Despite the lack of evidence for specific phosphate target or if lowering phosphate improves survival, use of phosphate binders has remained central strategy in approach to hyperphosphatemia. Use of binders has added to the cost and contributed significant pill burden. Restriction of calcium-based binders to avoid positive calcium balance and consequent vascular calcification risk has a physiological rationale and weight of observational studies.

SUMMARY

There is currently no conclusive evidence that definitively guides the choice of any specific binders for management of hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD. Use of noncalcium-based binders has a theoretical advantage in restricting total calcium intake to decrease the risk of vascular calcification but no proven benefits for mortality.

An update on phosphate binders for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis: a review of safety profiles

INTRODUCTION

Hyperphosphatemia is an inevitable complication for patients undergoing dialysis, as is the resulting need for treatment with phosphate binders. Currently, various phosphate binders are clinically available. In addition to their phosphate-lowering activity, individual phosphate binders have differing safety profiles and off-target actions.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the safety of phosphate binders and issues to be resolved.

EXPERT OPINION

Calcium-based phosphate binders are well tolerated but may increase calcium overload risk. Sevelamer reduces serum cholesterol levels and exerts anti-inflammatory effects. Compared to sevelamer, bixalomer is associated with fewer gastrointestinal symptoms. Aluminum-containing binders, lanthanum carbonate, and sucroferric oxyhydroxide exhibit strong phosphate-lowering activity. Although ferric citrate reduces erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron doses, its use requires monitoring of iron metabolic markers to avoid overload. Occasionally, combined use of multiple phosphate binders can offer the advantages of each phosphate binder while minimizing their drawbacks; thus, this may be desirable according to individual patients' conditions and comorbidities. However, increased pill burden and nonadherence to phosphate binders emerge as new problems. We expect that novel therapeutic strategies will be developed to resolve these issues.

Differentiating the causes of adynamic bone in advanced chronic kidney disease informs osteoporosis treatment

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased fracture risk because of impaired bone quality and quantity. Low bone mineral density predicts fracture risk in all CKD stages, including advanced CKD (CKD G4-5D). Pharmacological therapy improves bone mineral density and reduces fracture risk in moderate CKD. Its efficacy in advanced CKD remains to be determined, although pilot studies suggest a positive effect on bone mineral density. Currently, antiresorptive agents are the most commonly prescribed drugs for the prevention and therapy of osteoporosis. Their use in advanced CKD has been limited by the lack of large clinical trials and fear of causing kidney dysfunction and adynamic bone disease. In recent decades, adynamic bone disease has evolved as the most predominant form of renal osteodystrophy, commonly associated with poor outcomes, including premature mortality and progression of vascular calcification. Evolving evidence indicates that reduction of bone turnover by parathyroidectomy or pharmacological therapies, such as calcimimetics and antiresorptive agents, are not associated with premature mortality or accelerated vascular calcification in CKD. In contrast, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, malnutrition, and diabetes can induce low bone turnover and associate with poor prognosis. Thus, the conditions causing suppression of bone turnover rather than the low bone turnover per se may account for the perceived association with outcomes. Anabolic treatment, in contrast, has been suggested to improve turnover and bone mass in patients with advanced CKD and low bone turnover; however, uncertainty about safety even exceeds that of antiresorptive agents. Here, we critically review the pathophysiological concept of adynamic bone disease and discuss the effect of low bone turnover on the safety and efficacy of anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in advanced CKD.

Evaluation of the cost-utility of phosphate binders as a treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the economic evaluations

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients commonly results in vascular calcification leading to increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Phosphate binders (PBs) are used for hyperphosphatemia and can be calcium-based (CBPBs) or non-calcium-based (NCBPBs), the latter being more expensive than CBPBs. In this study, we used meta-analysis approaches to assess the cost-utility of PBs for hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients.

METHODS

Relevant studies published prior to June 2019 were identified from PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry. Studies were eligible if they included CKD patients with hyperphosphatemia, compared any PBs and reported economic outcomes. Meta-analysis was applied to pool incremental net benefit (INB) across studies stratified by country income.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies encompassing 32 comparisons were eligible. Lanthanum carbonate, a NCBPB, was a more cost-effective option than CBPBs in high-income countries (HICs), with a pooled INB of $3984.4 (599.5-7369.4), especially in pre-dialysis patients and used as a second-line option with INBs of $4860.2 (641.5-9078.8), $4011.0 (533.7-7488.3), respectively. Sevelamer, also a NCBPB, was not more cost-effective as a first-line option compared to CBPBs with a pooled INB of $6045.8 (- 23,453.0 to 35,522.6) and $34,168.9 (- 638.0 to 68,975.7) in HICs and upper middle-income countries, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lanthanum carbonate was significantly more cost-effective than CBPBs as a second-line option for hyperphosphatemia in pre-dialysis patients in HICs. However, the use of sevelamer is not more cost-effective as a first-line option compared to CBPBs.

Effect of Treating Hyperphosphatemia With Lanthanum Carbonate vs Calcium Carbonate on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis: The LANDMARK Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Among patients with hyperphosphatemia undergoing dialysis, it is unclear whether non-calcium-based phosphate binders are more effective than calcium-based binders for reducing cardiovascular events.

Objective

To determine whether lanthanum carbonate reduces cardiovascular events compared with calcium carbonate in patients with hyperphosphatemia at risk of vascular calcification undergoing hemodialysis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Open-label, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial with blinded end point adjudication performed in 2374 patients with chronic kidney disease from 273 hemodialysis facilities in Japan. Eligible patients had hyperphosphatemia and 1 or more risk factors for vascular calcification (ie, ≥65 years, postmenopausal, diabetes). Enrollment occurred from November 2011 to July 2014; follow-up ended June 2018.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive either lanthanum carbonate (n = 1154) or calcium carbonate (n = 1155) and titrated to achieve serum phosphate levels of between 3.5 mg/dL and 6.0 mg/dL.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, unstable angina, transient ischemic attack, or hospitalization for heart failure or ventricular arrhythmia). Secondary outcomes included overall survival, secondary hyperparathyroidism-free survival, hip fracture-free survival, and adverse events.

Results

Among 2309 randomized patients (median age, 69 years; 40.5% women), 1851 (80.2%) completed the trial. After a median follow-up of 3.16 years, cardiovascular events occurred in 147 of 1063 patients in the lanthanum calcium group and 134 of 1072 patients in the calcium carbonate group (incidence rate, 4.80 vs 4.30 per 100 person-years; difference 0.50 per 100 person-years [95% CI, -0.57 to 1.56]; hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95%, CI, 0.88 to 1.41], P = .37). There were no significant differences in all-cause death (difference, 0.43 per 100 person-years [95% CI, -0.63 to 1.49]; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.37]; P = .42) or hip fracture (difference, 0.10 per 100 person-years [95% CI, -0.26 to 0.47]; HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.62 to 2.35]; P = .58). The lanthanum carbonate group had an increased risk of cardiovascular death (difference, 0.61 per 100 person-years [95% CI, 0.02 to 1.21]; HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.01 to 2.27]; P = .045) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (difference, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.49 to 2.19]; HR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.19 to 2.20]; P = .002). Adverse events occurred in 282 (25.7%) in the lanthanum carbonate group and 259 (23.4%) in the calcium carbonate groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients undergoing hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia and at least 1 vascular calcification risk factor, treatment of hyperphosphatemia with lanthanum carbonate compared with calcium carbonate did not result in a significant difference in composite cardiovascular events. However, the event rate was low, and the findings may not apply to patients at higher risk.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01578200; UMIN Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: UMIN000006815.

State-of-the-Art Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients With CKD: An NKF-KDOQI Controversies Perspective

Phosphate binders are among the most common medications prescribed to patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis and are often used in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). In patients with CKD glomerular filtration rate category 3a (G3a) or worse, including those with kidney failure who are receiving dialysis, clinical practice guidelines suggest "lowering elevated phosphate levels towards the normal range" with possible strategies including dietary phosphate restriction or use of binders. Additionally, guidelines suggest restricting the use of oral elemental calcium often contained in phosphate binders. Nutrition guidelines in CKD suggest<800-1,000mg of calcium daily, whereas CKD bone and mineral disorder guidelines do not provide clear targets, but<1,500mg in maintenance dialysis patients has been previously recommended. Many different classes of phosphate binders are now available and clinical trials have not definitively demonstrated the superiority of any class of phosphate binders over another with regard to clinical outcomes. Use of phosphate binders contributes substantially to patients' pill burden and out-of-pocket costs, and many have side effects. This has led to uncertainty regarding the use and best choice of phosphate binders for patients with CKD or kidney failure. In this controversies perspective, we discuss the evidence base around binder use in CKD and kidney failure with a focus on comparisons of available binders.

Nutritional management in patients with chronic kidney disease

The global prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing with the aging of populations worldwide. As kidney function declines, the accumulation of metabolic waste products and excessive electrolytes can significantly impair the health of patients with CKD. As nutritional management of patients with CKD is thought to control uremic symptoms and provide beneficial effects on the progression of kidney dysfunction, the diet of patients with CKD should be an important consideration in their care. Many guidelines recommend limiting protein intake in these patients, as high-protein diets aggravate kidney dysfunction. Excess sodium may be associated with CKD progression and all-cause mortality and, therefore, limiting salt intake is generally recommended. Low potassium is associated with muscle weakness and hypertension, whereas high potassium is associated with cardiac arrhythmia. Therefore, recent guidelines recommend adjusting dietary potassium intake on an individual basis to maintain serum potassium levels within the normal range. Appropriate dietary calcium intake is recommended to maintain calcium balance in patients with CKD G3, G4. Given the many dietary considerations for patients with CKD, effective nutritional management is challenging. Individualized strategies are needed to ensure the best outcome for patients with CKD.

Current Therapy in CKD Patients Can Affect Vitamin K Status

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have a higher risk of cardiovascular (CVD) morbidity and mortality compared to the general population. The links between CKD and CVD are not fully elucidated but encompass both traditional and uremic-related risk factors. The term CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) indicates a systemic disorder characterized by abnormal levels of calcium, phosphate, PTH and FGF-23, along with vitamin D deficiency, decreased bone mineral density or altered bone turnover and vascular calcification. A growing body of evidence shows that CKD patients can be affected by subclinical vitamin K deficiency; this has led to identifying such a condition as a potential therapeutic target given the specific role of Vitamin K in metabolism of several proteins involved in bone and vascular health. In other words, we can hypothesize that vitamin K deficiency is the common pathogenetic link between impaired bone mineralization and vascular calcification. However, some of the most common approaches to CKD, such as (1) low vitamin K intake due to nutritional restrictions, (2) warfarin treatment, (3) VDRA and calcimimetics, and (4) phosphate binders, may instead have the opposite effects on vitamin K metabolism and storage in CKD patients.

Phosphate binders in chronic kidney disease: an updated narrative review of recent data

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is frequently accompanied by hyperphosphatemia. High serum phosphate usually requires dietary measures, adequate dialysis prescription and/or phosphate binders. For this narrative review a PubMed searched was undertaken to identify new publications on phosphate binders that had been published between January 2015 and July 2019. The present review summarizes this most recent information on dietary measures and their problems in treating hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients, overall effects of phosphate binders on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, adherence to phosphate binder therapy as well as new data on specific aspects of the various phosphate binders on the market: calcium-containing phosphate binders, polymeric phosphate binders (sevelamer, bixalomer, colestilan), magnesium-containing phosphate binders, lanthanum carbonate, ferric citrate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, and new compounds in development, in particular drugs targeting intestinal phosphate transporters.

Mineral Bone Abnormalities and Vascular Calcifications

Vascular calcification (VC) is common in chronic kidney disease, increases in prevalence as patients progress to end-stage renal disease, and is significantly associated with mortality. VC is a complex and highly regulated process similar to bone formation whereby hydroxyapatite crystals deposit in the intimal or medial layer of arteries. Mineral bone abnormalities are common in chronic kidney disease; reduction in glomerular filtration rate and changes in vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and fibroblast growth factor 23 result in the dysregulation of phosphorus and calcium metabolism. Cell culture studies, animal models, and observational and clinical studies all suggest this abnormal mineral metabolism plays a role in the initiation and progression of VC in kidney disease. This review will focus on these mineral bone abnormalities and how they may contribute to mechanisms that induce VC in kidney disease.