Clinical Outcomes After Intensifying Antihypertensive Medication Regimens Among Older Adults at Hospital Discharge

Impact of Hospitalizations on Problematic Medication Use Among Community-Dwelling Persons With Dementia

BACKGROUND

Hospitalizations are frequently disruptive for persons with dementia (PWD) in part due to the use of potentially problematic medications for complications such as delirium, pain, and insomnia. We sought to determine the impact of hospitalizations on problematic medication prescribing in the months following hospitalization.

METHODS

We included community-dwelling PWD in the Health and Retirement Study aged ≥66 with a hospitalization from 2008 to 2018. We characterized problematic medications as medications that negatively affect cognition (strongly anticholinergics/sedative-hypnotics), medications from the 2019 Beers criteria, and medications from STOPP-V2. To capture durable changes, we compared problematic medications 4 weeks prehospitalization (baseline) to 4 months posthospitalization period. We used a generalized linear mixed model with Poisson distribution adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity count, prehospital chronic medications, and timepoint.

RESULTS

Among 1 475 PWD, 504 had a qualifying hospitalization (median age 84 (IQR = 79-90), 66% female, 17% Black). There was a small increase in problematic medications from the baseline to posthospitalization timepoint that did not reach statistical significance (adjusted mean 1.28 vs 1.40, difference 0.12 (95% CI -0.03, 0.26), p = .12). Results were consistent across medication domains and certain subgroups. In one prespecified subgroup, individuals on <5 prehospital chronic medications showed a greater increase in posthospital problematic medications compared with those on ≥5 medications (p = .04 for interaction, mean increase from baseline to posthospitalization of 0.25 for those with <5 medications (95% CI 0.05, 0.44) vs. 0.06 (95% CI -0.12, 0.25) for those with ≥5 medications).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalizations had a small, nonstatistically significant effect on longer-term problematic medication use among PWD.

2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from August 2022 to March 2023 to identify clinical studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from the "2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery" have been updated with new evidence consolidated to guide clinicians; clinicians should be advised this guideline supersedes the previously published 2014 guideline. In addition, evidence-based management strategies, including pharmacological therapies, perioperative monitoring, and devices, for cardiovascular disease and associated medical conditions, have been developed.

Complex Patterns of Antihypertensive Treatment Changes in Long-Term Care Residents

OBJECTIVES

Antihypertensive treatment changes are common in long-term care residents, yet data on the frequency and predictors of changes are lacking. We described the patterns of antihypertensive changes and examined the triggering factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 24,870 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing home residents aged ≥65 years with long-term stays (≥180 days) from 2006 to 2019.

METHODS

We obtained data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Based on Bar Code Medication Administration medication data, we defined 2 types of change events in 180 days of admission: deprescribing (reduced number of antihypertensives or dose reduction of ≥30% compared with the previous week and maintained for at least 2 weeks) and intensification (opposite of deprescribing). Mortality was identified within 2 years after admission.

RESULTS

More than 85% of residents were prescribed antihypertensives and 68% of them experienced ≥1 change event during the first 6 months of the nursing home stay. We categorized residents into 10 distinct patterns: no change (27%), 1 deprescribing (11%), multiple deprescribing (5%), 1 intensification (10%), multiple intensification (7%), 1 deprescribing followed by 1 intensification (3%), 1 intensification followed by 1 deprescribing (4%), 3 changes with mixed events (7%), >3 changes with mixed events (10%), and no antihypertensive use (15%). Treatment changes were more frequent in residents with better physical function and/or cognitive function. Potentially triggering factors differed by the type of antihypertensive change: incident high blood pressure and cardiovascular events were associated with intensification, and low blood pressure, weight loss, and falls were associated with deprescribing. Death occurred in 7881 (32%) residents over 2 years. The highest mortality was for those without antihypertensive medication (incidence = 344/1000 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Patterns of medication changes existing in long-term care residents are complex. Future studies should explore the benefits and harms of these antihypertensive treatment changes.

Management of Elevated Blood Pressure in the Hospital-Rethinking Current Practice

This Clinical Insight proposes a new framework for managing asymptomatic blood pressure elevation in the hospital setting.

Impact of changes in antihypertensive medication on treatment intensity at hospital discharge and 30 days afterwards

Introduction

Little is known about the cumulative effect of changes in antihypertensive medications on treatment intensity. This study analyzed how changes in antihypertensive medications affect the intensity of antihypertensive treatment at hospital discharge and 30 days afterwards.

Methods

A prospective observational study of 299 hospitalized adult medical patients with antihypertensive therapy was conducted. The effect of medication changes on treatment intensity was evaluated by the Total Antihypertensive Therapeutic Intensity Score (TIS).

Results

At discharge, antihypertensive medications were changed in 62% of patients (184/299), resulting in a very small median reduction in TIS of -0.16. Treatment intensity was reduced more with increasing number of antihypertensive medications at admission, whereas it increased with elevated inpatient systolic blood pressure. Thirty days after discharge, antihypertensive medications were changed in 37% of patients (88/239) resulting in a median change in TIS of -0.02. Among them, 90% (79/88) had already undergone a change at discharge. The change in treatment intensity after discharge was inversely correlated with a change at discharge.

Discussion

Changes in antihypertensive medication frequently occurred at discharge but had a minimal impact on the intensity of antihypertensive treatment. However, these adjustments exposed patients to further medication changes after discharge, evidencing the need for treatment reassessment in the first month post-discharge.

Which older adults are at highest risk of prescribing cascades? A national study of the gabapentinoid-loop diuretic cascade

BACKGROUND

Prescribing cascades are important contributors to polypharmacy. Little is known about which older adults are at highest risk of experiencing prescribing cascades. We explored which older veterans are at highest risk of the gabapentinoid (including gabapentin and pregabalin)-loop diuretic (LD) cascade, given the dramatic increase in gabapentinoid prescribing in recent years.

METHODS

Using Veterans Affairs and Medicare claims data (2010-2019), we performed a prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) to assess loop diuretic initiation before and after gabapentinoid initiation among older veterans (≥66 years). To identify the cascade, we calculated the adjusted sequence ratio (aSR), which assesses the temporality of LD relative to gabapentinoid initiation. To explore high-risk groups, we used multivariable logistic regression with prescribing order modeled as a binary dependent variable. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs), measuring the extent to which factors are associated with one prescribing order versus another.

RESULTS

Of 151,442 veterans who initiated a gabapentinoid, there were 1,981 patients who initiated a LD within 6 months after initiating a gabapentinoid compared to 1,599 patients who initiated a LD within 6 months before initiating a gabapentinoid. In the gabapentinoid-LD group, the mean age was 73 years, 98% were male, 13% were Black, 5% were Hispanic, and 80% were White. Patients in each group were similar across patient and health utilization factors (standardized mean difference <0.10 for all comparisons). The aSR was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.34), strongly suggesting the cascade's presence. People age ≥85 years were less likely to have the cascade (compared to 66-74 years; aOR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.96), and people taking ≥10 medications were more likely to have the cascade (compared to 0-4 drugs; aOR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults, those who are younger and taking many medications may be at higher risk of the gabapentinoid-LD cascade, contributing to worsening polypharmacy and potential drug-related harms. We did not identify strong predictors of this cascade, suggesting that prescribing cascade prevention efforts should be widespread rather than focused on specific subgroups.

Defining systolic blood pressure normative values in hospitalized pediatric patients: a single center experience

BACKGROUND

Normative blood pressure (BP) values and definition of hypertension (HTN) in children in outpatient setting cannot be reliably used for inpatient therapy initiation. No normative exists to describe HTN in hospitalized pediatric populations. We aimed to study the prevalence of hypertension and produce normative BP values in hospitalized children.

METHODS

Cross sectional observational study of all children hospitalized on acute care floors, ≥2 and <18 years age, at Stanford Children's Hospital, from Jan-01-2014 to Dec-31-2018. Cohort included 7468 hospital encounters with a total of 118,423 automated, oscillometric, BPs measured in the upper extremity during a hospitalization of >24 hours.

RESULTS

Overall prevalence of HTN, defined by outpatient guidelines, was 12-48% in boys and 6-39% in girls, stage 1 systolic HTN in 12-38% of boys and 6-31% of girls, stage 2 systolic HTN in 3-10% of boys and 1-8% of girls. Centile curves were derived demonstrating overall higher BP reading for hospitalized patients compared to the outpatient setting.

CONCLUSION

Higher blood pressures are anticipated during hospitalization. Thresholds provided by the centile curves generated in this study may provide the clinician with some guidance on how to manage hospitalized pediatric patients based on clinical circumstances.

IMPACT

Hospitalized children have higher blood pressures compared to patients in the ambulatory setting, hence outpatient normative blood pressure values cannot be reliably used for inpatient therapy initiation. No normative exists to describe hypertension in hospitalized pediatric populations. The thresholds provided by the centile curves generated in this study may provide the clinician with some guidance on how to manage hospitalized pediatric patients based on clinical circumstances.

Blood Pressure, Readmission, and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized With Acute Kidney Injury

Importance

Acute kidney injury (AKI) complicates 20% to 25% of hospital admissions and is associated with long-term mortality, especially from cardiovascular disease. Lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) following AKI may be associated with lower mortality, but potentially at the cost of higher short-term complications.

Objective

To determine associations of SBP with mortality and hospital readmissions following AKI, and to determine whether time from discharge affects these associations.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study of adults with AKI during a hospitalization in Veteran Healthcare Association (VHA) hospitals was conducted between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients with 1 year or less of data within the VA system prior to admission, severe or end-stage liver disease, stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, metastatic cancer, and no blood pressure values within 30 days of discharge were excluded. Data analysis was conducted from May 2022 to February 2024.

Exposure

SBP was treated as time-dependent (categorized as <120 mm Hg, 120-129 mm Hg, 130-139 mm Hg, 140-149 mm Hg, 150-159 mm Hg, and ≥160 mm Hg [comparator]). Time spent in each SBP category was accumulated over time and represented in 30-day increments.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were time to mortality and time to all-cause hospital readmission. Cox proportional hazards regression was adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values. To evaluate associations over time, hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated at 60 days, 90 days, 120 days, 180 days, 270 days, and 365 days from discharge.

Results

Of 237 409 admissions with AKI, 80 960 (57 242 aged 65 years or older [70.7%]; 77 965 male [96.3%] and 2995 female [3.7%]) were included. The cohort had high rates of diabetes (16 060 patients [20.0%]), congestive heart failure (22 516 patients [28.1%]), and chronic lung disease (27 682 patients [34.2%]), and 1-year mortality was 15.9% (12 876 patients). Overall, patients with SBP between 130 and 139 mm Hg had the most favorable risk level for mortality and readmission. There were clear, time-dependent mediations on associations in all groups. Compared with patients with SBP of 160 mm Hg or greater, the risk of mortality for patients with SBP between 130 and 139 mm Hg decreased between 60 days (adjusted HR, 1.20; 99% CI, 1.00-1.44) and 365 days (adjusted HR, 0.58; 99% CI, 0.45-0.76). SBP less than 120 mm Hg was associated with increased risk of mortality at all time points.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this retrospective cohort study of post-AKI patients, there were important time-dependent mediations of the association of blood pressure with mortality and readmission. These findings may inform timing of post-AKI blood pressure treatment.

Correlates of Spontaneous Blood Pressure Reduction Following Severe Inpatient Hypertension Development

BACKGROUND

Severe hypertension (sHTN) is prevalent in 10% of hospitalized patients and treatment guidelines are lacking. As such, patients who develop sHTN might unnecessarily receive antihypertensive medications which could lead to worse outcomes. Our goal was to investigate correlates of spontaneous blood pressure (BP) reduction to help guide future treatment decisions and avoid harm associated with aggressive BP treatment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults between 2016 and 2020 who developed sHTN, SBP >180 or DBP >110 mm Hg, after admission. Spontaneous BP reduction was defined as a SBP <160 and a DBP <100 mm Hg achieved within 3 h of sHTN in the absence of antihypertensive therapy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify correlates of spontaneous BP reduction.

RESULTS

Of the 12,825 patients who developed sHTN, 44.2% had spontaneous BP reduction. After adjustment, we found that patients most likely to experience a BP drop received steroids before onset of sHTN (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.3 [1.09, 1.56]), had higher potassium levels on admission (OR: 1.2 [1.09, 1.24]) and were more likely to have a history of chronic pulmonary disease (OR: 1.1 [1.01, 1.18]) or cardiac arrythmia (OR: 1.1 [1.01, 1.18]). While numerically different, these differences were not clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that almost half the patients who develop sHTN have spontaneous BP reduction. Conventional clinical and demographic characteristics were not strong predictors of spontaneous BP reduction following sHTN development. More research is needed to confirm our findings and help guide treatment of sHTN.

Degree of Risk Factor Control and Incident Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients With Hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether joint risk factor control could reduce the excess risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 75,293 patients with diagnosed hypertension from the UK Biobank study were included, matched with 256,619 nonhypertensive controls, and followed up until May 31, 2021. Seven risk factors were measured to define joint risk factor control, including blood pressure, body mass index, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin A1c, albuminuria, smoking, and physical activity.

RESULTS

Among hypertensive patients, 14% to 24% lower risks of CVD outcomes were associated with each additional risk factor control. In the Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted hazard ratios for patients with 6 or more risk factor controls compared with patients having 2 or less risk factor controls were 0.49 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.55) for CVD, 0.51 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.57) for coronary heart disease, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.60) for stroke, and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.44) for CVD mortality. The excess risks of CVD outcomes in patients with hypertension were diminished to nonsignificant or even lower compared with controls if achieving 6 or more risk factor controls. Men experienced stronger protective associations of joint risk factor control on risks of CVD than women (P<.001 for interaction).

CONCLUSION

The joint risk factor control is associated with lower risks of CVD, and a high degree of risk factor control may considerably attenuate the excess risk of CVD among patients with hypertension.

Impact of medication intensification on 30-day hospital readmissions in a geriatric trauma population: A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Fall-related injuries are a significant health issue that occur in 25% of older adults and account for a significant number of trauma-related hospitalizations. Although medication intensification may increase the risk of hospital readmissions in non-trauma patients, data on a geriatric trauma population are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of medication intensification on 30-day hospital readmissions in geriatric patients hospitalized for fall-related injuries.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with geriatric who presented to one of three trauma centers within a large, health-system between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. Patients at least 65 years old admitted with a fall-related injury were eligible for inclusion. Patients were grouped according to medication changes at discharge, which included intensified and non-intensified groups. Medication intensification included increased dose(s) or initiation of new agents. The primary outcome was the 30-day hospital readmission rate.

RESULTS

Of the 870 patients included (median [interquartile range, IQR] age, 82 [74-89] years, 522 (60%) female, and 220 (25%) with a previous fall), there were 471 (54%) and 399 (46%) patients in the intensified and non-intensified groups, respectively. The intensified group had a higher 30-day hospital readmission rate (21% intensified vs. 16% non-intensified, p = 0.043; number needed to harm 20) based on an unweighted analysis. According to a weighted propensity score logistic regression, medication intensification was associated with higher 30-day hospital readmissions (24% [95% confidence interval [CI] 19-31%] intensified vs. 15% [95% CI 11-20%] non-intensified, p = 0.018). These results were consistent within competing risk models accounting for death (cause-specific model: hazard ratio [HR] 1.63 [95% CI 1.07-2.49], p = 0.023; Fine-Gray model: HR 1.64 [95% CI 1.07-2.50], p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

In a geriatric trauma population hospitalized after a fall, intensification of medications may pose an increased risk of 30-day hospital readmission.

Antihypertensive treatment in people of very old age with frailty: time for a paradigm shift?

The optimal management of hypertension in individuals aged 80 years or older with frailty remains uncertain due to multiple gaps in evidence. Complex health issues, polypharmacy, and limited physiological reserve make responding to antihypertensive treatments unpredictable. Patients in this age group may have limited life expectancy, so their quality of life should be prioritized when making treatment decisions. Further research is needed to identify which patients would benefit from more relaxed blood pressure targets and which antihypertensive medications are preferable or should be avoided. A paradigm shift is required in attitudes towards treatment, placing equal emphasis on deprescribing and prescribing when optimizing care. This review discusses the current evidence on managing hypertension in individuals aged 80 years or older with frailty, but further research is essential to address the gaps in knowledge and improve the care of this population.

Clinical Outcomes of Intensive Inpatient Blood Pressure Management in Hospitalized Older Adults

Importance

Asymptomatic blood pressure (BP) elevations are common in hospitalized older adults, and widespread heterogeneity in the clinical management of elevated inpatient BPs exists.

Objective

To examine the association of intensive treatment of elevated inpatient BPs with in-hospital clinical outcomes of older adults hospitalized for noncardiac conditions.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study examined Veterans Health Administration data between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, for patients aged 65 years or older hospitalized for noncardiovascular diagnoses and who experienced elevated BPs in the first 48 hours of hospitalization.

Interventions

Intensive BP treatment following the first 48 hours of hospitalization, defined as receipt of intravenous antihypertensives or oral classes not used prior to admission.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite of inpatient mortality, intensive care unit transfer, stroke, acute kidney injury, B-type natriuretic peptide elevation, and troponin elevation. Data were analyzed between October 1, 2021, and January 10, 2023, with propensity score overlap weighting used to adjust for confounding between those who did and did not receive early intensive treatment.

Results

Among 66 140 included patients (mean [SD] age, 74.4 [8.1] years; 97.5% male and 2.6% female; 17.4% Black, 1.7% Hispanic, and 75.9% White), 14 084 (21.3%) received intensive BP treatment in the first 48 hours of hospitalization. Patients who received early intensive treatment vs those who did not continued to receive a greater number of additional antihypertensives during the remainder of their hospitalization (mean additional doses, 6.1 [95% CI, 5.8-6.4] vs 1.6 [95% CI, 1.5-1.8], respectively). Intensive treatment was associated with a greater risk of the primary composite outcome (1220 [8.7%] vs 3570 [6.9%]; weighted odds ratio [OR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.18-1.39), with the highest risk among patients receiving intravenous antihypertensives (weighted OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.65-2.19). Intensively treated patients were more likely to experience each component of the composite outcome except for stroke and mortality. Findings were consistent across subgroups stratified by age, frailty, preadmission BP, early hospitalization BP, and cardiovascular disease history.

Conclusions and Relevance

The study's findings indicate that among hospitalized older adults with elevated BPs, intensive pharmacologic antihypertensive treatment was associated with a greater risk of adverse events. These findings do not support the treatment of elevated inpatient BPs without evidence of end organ damage, and they highlight the need for randomized clinical trials of inpatient BP treatment targets.

The effect of polypharmacy on healthcare services utilization in older adults with comorbidities: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Older adults are more prone to increasing comorbidities and polypharmacy. Polypharmacy is associated with inappropriate prescribing and an increased risk of adverse effects. This study examined the effect of polypharmacy in older adults on healthcare services utilization (HSU). It also explored the impact of different drug classes of polypharmacy including psychotropic, antihypertensive, and antidiabetic polypharmacy on HSU.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. Community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 65 years were selected from the primary care patient cohort database of the ambulatory clinics of the Department of Family Medicine at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Concomitant use of 5 or more prescription medications was considered polypharmacy. Demographics, Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI), and HSU outcomes, including the rate of all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, rate of all-cause hospitalization, rate of ED visits for pneumonia, rate of hospitalization for pneumonia, and mortality were collected. Binomial logistic regression models were used to predict the rates of HSU outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 496 patients were analyzed. Comorbidities were present in all patients, with 22.8% (113) of patients having mild to moderate comorbidity and 77.2% (383) of patients having severe comorbidity. Patients with polypharmacy were more likely to have severe comorbidity compared to patients with no polypharmacy (72.3% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.001). Patients with polypharmacy were more likely to visit the ED for all causes as compared to patients without polypharmacy (40.6% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.05), and had a significantly higher rate of all-cause hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio aOR 1.66, 95 CI = 1.08-2.56, p = 0.022). Patients with psychotropic polypharmacy were more likely to be hospitalized due to pneumonia (crude odds ratio cOR 2.37, 95 CI = 1.03-5.46, p = 0.043), and to visit ED for Pneumonia (cOR 2.31, 95 CI = 1.00-5.31, p = 0.049). The association lost significance after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing prevalence of polypharmacy amongst the geriatric population with comorbidity is associated with an increase in HSU outcomes. As such, frequent medication revisions in a holistic, multi-disciplinary approach are needed.

Rational Prescribing and Deprescribing of Antihypertensive Medications in Older People, a Three-Part Narrative Review, Part 3

What happens when you stop? This is the third of a three-part series on antihypertensive medication use in older people. In the first, we reviewed the importance of better blood pressure (BP) control, even in older people with hypertension. In the second, we discussed the limitations of the evidence favoring intensive therapy for some older people. For older people with advanced frailty or those with a limited life expectancy, medications taken for BP can actually be a source of morbidity. Guidelines encourage clinical judgment and rational prescribing. Sometimes the best action is to stop prescribing. De-prescribing of medical therapy is now considered good practice for a range of medications for suitable patients; should this include antihypertensives? In part three of this three-part series, we will review some of the evidence available thus far, demonstrating de-intensification of antihypertensive medications is not a new idea. We will offer a guide to identifying the most suitable patients for de-prescribing: cognitive impairment, frailty, when circumstances change, or when BP is (too) well-controlled. This is an area of equipoise and needs more research. There is a path forward that we hope to illuminate.

How to Improve Clinical Outcomes and Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in Older People with Cardiovascular Disease: Bridging Evidence Gaps

The geriatric population is greatly impacted by cardiovascular disease. Thus, it becomes essential to 'geriatricise' the cardiologist through the dissemination of geriatric cardiology. In the early days of geriatric cardiology, it was discussed whether it was simply cardiology 'well done'. Today, 40 years later, it seems clear that this is indeed the case. Patients with cardiovascular disease usually have several chronic conditions. Clinical practice guidelines often address a single condition and do not provide sufficient guidance for patients with multimorbidity. There are several evidence gaps regarding these patients. Physicians and members ofthe care team need a multidimensional understanding ofthe patient to better promote the optimisation of care. It is important to understand that ageing is inevitable, heterogeneous and increases vulnerability. Caregivers must know how to assess elderly patients in a multidomain practical way and how to recognise the factors that may have implications on treatment.

Antihypertensive treatment changes and related clinical outcomes in older hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

Hypertension management in older patients represents a challenge, particularly when hospitalized.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate the determinants and related outcomes of antihypertensive drug prescription in a cohort of older hospitalized patients.

METHODS

A total of 5671 patients from REPOSI (a prospective multicentre observational register of older Italian in-patients from internal medicine or geriatric wards) were considered; 4377 (77.2%) were hypertensive. Minimum treatment (MT) for hypertension was defined according to the 2018 ESC guidelines [an angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitor (ACE-I) or an angiotensin-receptor-blocker (ARB) with a calcium-channel-blocker (CCB) and/or a thiazide diuretic; if >80 years old, an ACE-I or ARB or CCB or thiazide diuretic]. Determinants of MT discontinuation at discharge were assessed. Study outcomes were any cause rehospitalization/all cause death, all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization/death, CV death, non-CV death, evaluated according to the presence of MT at discharge.

RESULTS

Hypertensive patients were older than normotensives, with a more impaired functional status, higher burden of comorbidity and polypharmacy. A total of 2233 patients were on MT at admission, 1766 were on MT at discharge. Discontinuation of MT was associated with the presence of comorbidities (lower odds for diabetes, higher odds for chronic kidney disease and dementia). An adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that MT for hypertension at discharge was associated with lower risk of all-cause death, all-cause death/hospitalization, CV death, CV death/hospitalization and non-CV death.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines-suggested MT for hypertension at discharge is associated with a lower risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, changes in antihypertensive treatment still occur in a significant proportion of older hospitalized patients.

Deprescribing Medications Among Older Adults From End of Hospitalization Through Postacute Care: A Shed-MEDS Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Deprescribing is a promising approach to addressing the burden of polypharmacy. Few studies have initiated comprehensive deprescribing in the hospital setting among older patients requiring ongoing care in a postacute care (PAC) facility.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of a patient-centered deprescribing intervention among hospitalized older adults transitioning or being discharged to a PAC facility.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial of the Shed-MEDS (Best Possible Medication History, Evaluate, Deprescribing Recommendations, and Synthesis) deprescribing intervention was conducted between March 2016 and October 2020. Patients who were admitted to an academic medical center and discharged to 1 of 22 PAC facilities affiliated with the medical center were recruited. Patients who were 50 years or older and had 5 or more prehospital medications were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to the intervention group or control group. Patients who were non-English speaking, were unhoused, were long-stay residents of nursing homes, or had less than 6 months of life expectancy were excluded. An intention-to-treat approach was used.

Interventions

The intervention group received the Shed-MEDS intervention, which consisted of a pharmacist- or nurse practitioner-led comprehensive medication review, patient or surrogate-approved deprescribing recommendations, and deprescribing actions that were initiated in the hospital and continued throughout the PAC facility stay. The control group received usual care at the hospital and PAC facility.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the total medication count at hospital discharge and PAC facility discharge, with follow-up assessments during the 90-day period after PAC facility discharge. Secondary outcomes included the total number of potentially inappropriate medications at each time point, the Drug Burden Index, and adverse events.

Results

A total of 372 participants (mean [SD] age, 76.2 [10.7] years; 229 females [62%]) were randomized to the intervention or control groups. Of these participants, 284 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (142 in the intervention group and 142 in the control group). Overall, there was a statistically significant treatment effect, with patients in the intervention group taking a mean of 14% fewer medications at PAC facility discharge (mean ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93; P < .001) and 15% fewer medications at the 90-day follow-up (mean ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92; P < .001) compared with the control group. The intervention additionally reduced patient exposure to potentially inappropriate medications and Drug Burden Index. Adverse drug event rates were similar between the intervention and control groups (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.52-1.30).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this trial showed that the Shed-MEDS patient-centered deprescribing intervention was safe and effective in reducing the total medication burden at PAC facility discharge and 90 days after discharge. Future studies are needed to examine the effect of this intervention on patient-reported and long-term clinical outcomes.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02979353.

Degree of Joint Risk Factor Control and Incident Heart Failure in Hypertensive Patients

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a major complication in patients with hypertension.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the extent to which joint risk factor control could attenuate hypertension-related excess risk of HF.

METHODS

The study included a total of 75,293 participants with diagnosed hypertension from the UK Biobank and matched with 256,619 nonhypertensive control subjects, followed up until May 31, 2021. The degree of joint risk factor control was assessed on the basis of the major cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure, body mass index, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin A1c, albuminuria, smoking, and physical activity. The Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations between the degree of risk factor control and risk of HF.

RESULTS

Among hypertensive patients, joint risk factor control showed an association with a stepwise reduction of incident HF risk. Each additional risk factor control was related to a 20% lower risk, and the optimal risk factor control (controlling ≥6 risk factors) was associated with a 62% lower risk (HR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.31-0.45). In addition, the study found that the hypertension-related excess risk of HF among participants jointly controlling ≥6 risk factors were even lower than in nonhypertensive control subjects (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67-0.94). The protective associations of joint risk factor control and risk of incident HF were broadly stronger among men than women and among medication users than nonusers (P for interaction < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The joint risk factor control is associated with a lower risk of incident HF in an accumulative and sex-specific manner. Optimal risk factor control may eliminate hypertension-related excess risk of HF.

Noncardiac inpatient has acute hypertension: Treat or not?

A retrospective study found more harm than benefit from treating elevated blood pressure in hospitalized noncardiac patients.

A clinical algorithm to determine target blood pressure in the elderly: evidence and limitations from a clinical perspective

As the elderly population is growing rapidly, management of hypertension in South Korea faces major challenges because the proportion of elderly hypertension patients is also increasing. The characteristics of this population are also much more complex than younger patients. Elderly hypertension is characterized by wide variations in (1) fitness or biological age, (2) white-coat effect, (3) poor functional status or frailty, (4) dependency in activities of daily living or institutionalization, (5) orthostatic hypotension, and (6) multiple comorbidities. All of these should be considered when choosing optimal target blood pressure in individual patients. Recent randomized clinical trials have shown that the benefits of intensive blood pressure control for elderly patients is greater than previously thought. For generalization of these results and implementation of the guidelines based on these studies, defining the clinician's role for individualization is critically important. For individualized decisions for target blood pressure (BP) in the elderly with hypertension, four components should first be checked. These consist of (1) the minimum requirement of functional status and capability of activities of daily living, (2) lack of harmful evidence by the target BP, (3) absence of white-coat hypertension, and (4) standing systolic BP ≥ 110 mmHg without orthostatic symptoms. Risk of decreased organ perfusion by arterial stenosis should be screened before starting intensive BP control. When the target BP differs among comorbidities, the lowest target BP should be given preference. After starting intensive BP lowering therapy, tolerability should be monitored, and the titration should be based on the mean level of blood pressure by office supplemented by out-of-office BPs. Applications of the clinical algorithms will be useful to achieve more standardized and simplified applications of target BP in the elderly.

Hypotension Under Antihypertensive Treatment and Incident Hospitalizations of Nursing Home Residents

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hypertension is the most prevalent chronic disease in older adults. Antihypertensive drug use increases with aging. In some studies, hypotension developing under antihypertensive medication use has been indicated as a potential risk factor for morbidity and mortality in older adults. Our objective was to assess the relationship between hypotension under antihypertensive treatment and incident hospitalization of nursing home residents.

METHODS

We detailed blood pressure measurements of the previous 1-year period that were noted regularly at 2-week intervals and studied their mean values. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) thresholds to define low SBP (≤ 110 mm Hg) and DBP (≤ 65 mm Hg) were derived from our previous study. We noted demographics, number of co-morbidities and regular medications, mobility status, and nutritional assessment via the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form.

RESULTS

We included 253 participants (66% male, mean age 75.7 ± 8.7 years). The prevalence of low SBP (≤ 110 mmHg) and low DBP (≤ 65 mmHg) was 34.8% and 15.8%, respectively. Among residents, 4% were bedridden, 15.8% wheelchair bound, 14.5% needing assistance for reduced mobility, and 62.7% were ambulatory. At a median of 15 months of follow-up, hospitalization incidence from any cause was 50.8% (n = 134). Incident hospitalization was more common in the group that had low DBP (odds ratio = 3.06; 95% confidence interval 1.02-9.15; p = 0.04) after adjusting for age, number of comorbidities and medications, mobility status, and nutritional status. Low SBP was not associated with hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The low DBP (≤ 65 mm Hg) during the previous year was associated with incident hospitalization of nursing home residents after adjustment for several factors. These findings indicate that lower DBP may be a causative factor for incident hospitalization. We need further studies to explore whether a correction of diastolic hypotension may decrease the hospitalization risk in this vulnerable population.

Blood Pressure Assessment and Treatment in the Observation Unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and the management of hypertension. Given the paucity of literature regarding the role of the observation unit in the management of hypertension, we will provide our recommendations based on our experience working in an observation unit.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many patients have limited access to primary care, and hypertension diagnosis often relies on office-based measurements. We will describe situations where that is not necessary to make the diagnosis. We will discuss the current non-pharmacologic treatment guidelines, the education of which should be provided to patients both in the emergency department and observation units. We will provide the current recommendations on what anti-hypertension medications can be initiated in the emergency department and observation units. Hypertension is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA. The utility of an observation unit in the diagnosis and management of patients with hypertension is beneficial particularly for those with risk factors for atherosclerotic disease. An observation unit stay provides the opportunity to diagnosis hypertension, initiate lifestyle education and pharmacologic treatment if indicated, and help to arrange appropriate follow-up for ongoing management and treatment in individuals with limited access to care.

Treatment of Hypertension Among Non-Cardiac Hospitalized Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a contemporary perspective and approach for the treatment of hypertension (HTN) among patients hospitalized for non-cardiac reasons.

RECENT FINDINGS

Elevated blood pressure (BP) is a common dilemma encountered by physicians, but guidelines are lacking to assist providers in managing hospitalized patients with elevated BP. Inpatient HTN is common, and management remains challenging given the paucity of data and misperceptions among training and practicing physicians. The outcomes associated with intensifying BP treatment during hospitalization can be harmful, with little to no long-term benefits. Data also suggests that medication intensification at discharge is not associated with improved outpatient BP control. Routine inpatient HTN control in the absence of end-organ damage has not shown to be helpful and may have deleterious effects. Since routine use of intravenous antihypertensives in hospitalized non-cardiac patients has been shown to prolong inpatient stay without benefits, their routine use should be avoided for inpatient HTN control. Future large-scale trials measuring clinical outcomes during prolonged follow-up may help to identify specific circumstances where inpatient HTN control may be beneficial.

Ambulatory diastolic blood pressure: a marker of comorbidity in elderly fit hypertensive individuals?

BACKGROUND

Masked diastolic hypotension is a new blood pressure (BP) pattern detected by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in elderly hypertensives. The aim of this study was to relate ABPM and comorbidity in a cohort of fit elderly subjects attending an outpatient hypertension clinic.

METHODS

Comorbidity was assessed by Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and CHA₂DS₂VASc score. All subjects evaluated with ABPM were aged ≥ 65 years. CCI and CHA₂DS₂VASc score were calculated. Diastolic hypotension was defined as mean ambulatory diastolic BP < 65 mmHg and logistic regression analysis was carried out in order to detect and independent relationship between comorbidity burden and night-time diastolic BP < 65 mmHg.

RESULTS

We studied 174 hypertensive elderly patients aged 72.1 ± 5.2 years, men were 93 (53.4%). Mean CCI was 0.91 ± 1.14 and mean CHA₂DS₂VASc score of 2.68 ± 1.22. Subjects with night-time mean diastolic values < 65 mmHg were higher in females [54.7% vs. 45.3%, P = 0.048; odds ratio (OR) = 1.914, 95% CI: 1.047-3.500]. Logistic regression analysis showed that only CHA₂DS₂VASc score was independently associated with night-time mean diastolic values < 65 mmHg (OR = 1.518, 95% CI: 1.161-1.985; P = 0.002), but CCI was not.

CONCLUSIONS

ABPM and comorbidity evaluation appear associated in elderly fit subjects with masked hypotension. Comorbid women appear to have higher risk for low ambulatory BP.

Severe inpatient hypertension prevalence and blood pressure response to antihypertensive treatment

Severe hypertension (HTN) that develops during hospitalization is more common than admission for HTN; however, it is poorly studied, and treatment guidelines are lacking. Our goal is to characterize hospitalized patients who develop severe HTN and assess blood pressure (BP) response to treatment. This is a multi-hospital retrospective cohort study of adults admitted for reasons other than HTN who developed severe HTN. The authors defined severe inpatient HTN as the first documented BP elevation (systolic BP > 180 or diastolic BP > 110) at least 1 hour after admission. Treatment was defined as receiving antihypertensives (intravenous [IV] or oral) within 6h of BP elevation. As a measure of possible overtreatment, the authors studied the association between treatment and time to mean arterial pressure (MAP) drop ≥ 30% using the Cox proportional hazards model. Among 224 265 hospitalized adults, 10% developed severe HTN of which 40% were treated. Compared to patients who did not develop severe HTN, those who did were older, more commonly women and black, and had more comorbidities. Incident MAP drop ≥ 30% among treated and untreated patients with severe HTN was 2.2 versus 5.7/1000 person-hours. After adjustment, treated versus. untreated patients had lower rates of MAP drop ≥ 30% (hazard rate [HR]: 0.9 [0.8, 0.99]). However, those receiving only IV treatment versus untreated had greater rates of MAP drop ≥ 30% (1.4 [1.2, 1.7]). Overall, the authors found that clinically significant MAP drop is observed among inpatients with severe HTN irrespective of treatment, with greater rates observed among patients treated only with IV antihypertensives. Further research is needed to phenotype inpatients with severe HTN.

Risk factors and prediction nomogram model for 1-year readmission for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with STEMI after PCI

To identify risk factors and develop a risk-prediction nomogram model for 1-year readmission due to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. A total of 526 eligible participants were enrolled, which included 456 non-readmitted and 70 readmitted patients. Multivariate logistical regressions were performed to identify the independent risk factors for readmission, and a prediction nomogram model was developed based on the results of the regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. Female (OR = 2.426; 95% CI: 1.395-4.218), hypertension (OR = 1.898; 95% CI: 1.100-3.275), 3-vessel disease (OR = 2.632; 95% CI: 1.332-5.201), in-hospital Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (OR = 3.143; 95% CI: 1.305-7.574), peak cTnI (OR = 1.003; 95% CI: 1.001-1.004) and baseline NT-proBNP (OR = 1.001; 95% CI: 1.000-1.002) were independent risk factors for readmission (all P < 0.05). The nomogram exhibited good discrimination with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.723, calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test; χ2 = 15.396, P = 0.052), and clinical usefulness. Female gender, hypertension, in-hospital VA, 3-vessel disease, baseline NT-proBNP, and peak cTnI were independent risk factors for readmission. The nomogram helped clinicians to identify the patients at risk of readmission before their hospital discharge, which may help reduce readmission rates.

Hypertension in the hospitalized patient: An update

In-patient hypertension is a common problem seen in the hospital setting. Current evidence-based guidelines define and address management of hypertension in ambulatory care and hypertensive emergencies in the hospital setting. However, they lack guidance for the management of acute asymptomatic/non-emergent hypertension in the hospitalised patient. The risk-benefit of treating inpatient asymptomatic hypertension is largely unknown. In this narrative review, we discuss current evidence-based perspectives to address this clinical entity.

This is not the time to modify a HTN regimen

Intensifying hypertension regimens at discharge increases risk in older patients.

The value of ambulatory blood pressure measurement to detect masked diastolic hypotension in older patients treated for hypertension

OBJECTIVE

assess how many patients with low ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are not identified when relying on office DBP alone, and thus have 'masked diastolic hypotension'.

DESIGN

cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

academic hospital.

SUBJECTS

848 patients treated for hypertension who received ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).

METHODS

cut-off value between on- and off-target systolic blood pressure (SBP): 140 mmHg. Cut-off for low office and/or ambulatory DBP: DBP ≤ 70 mmHg. 'Masked diastolic hypotension' was defined as office DBP > 70 mmHg and mean ambulatory DBP ≤ 70 mmHg.

RESULTS

mean age of the sample was 60 ± 13 years, 50% was female, 37% had diabetes, 42% preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD), mean office blood pressure (BP) was 134/79 mmHg. In all patients (n = 848), low office DBP was present in n = 84(10%), while n = 183(22%) had low ambulatory DBP. In all patients with normal-to-high office DBP (n = 764), n = 122(16%) had 'masked diastolic hypotension'. In this group, ambulatory DBP was 14-19 mmHg lower than office DBP. Patients with low ambulatory DBP were older, had more (cardiovascular) comorbidities, and used more (antihypertensive) drugs. Antihypertensive drugs were lowered or discontinued in 30% of all patients with 'masked diastolic hypotension' due to side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

'masked diastolic hypotension' is common among patients treated for hypertension, particularly in older patients with CVD (e.g. coronary artery disease, diabetes), patient groups in which the European Society of Cardiology/Hypertension guideline advises to prevent low DBP. Although it remains to be examined at which BP levels the harms of low DBP outweigh the benefits of lowering SBP, our observations are aimed to increase awareness among physicians.

Hypertension in the hospitalized patient: An update

In-patient hypertension is a common problem seen in the hospital setting. Current evidence-based guidelines define and address management of hypertension in ambulatory care and hypertensive emergencies in the hospital setting. However, they lack guidance for the management of acute asymptomatic/non-emergent hypertension in the hospitalised patient. The risk-benefit of treating inpatient asymptomatic hypertension is largely unknown. In this narrative review, we discuss current evidence-based perspectives to address this clinical entity.

A Pharmacist and Health Coach-Delivered Mobile Health Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Crossover Study

BACKGROUND

Aggressive management of blood glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol through medication and lifestyle adherence is necessary to minimize the adverse health outcomes of type 2 diabetes. However, numerous psychosocial and environmental barriers to adherence prevent low-income, urban, and ethnic minority populations from achieving their management goals, resulting in diabetes complications. Health coaches working with clinical pharmacists represent a promising strategy for addressing common diabetes management barriers. Mobile health (mHealth) tools may further enhance their ability to support vulnerable minority populations in diabetes management.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an mHealth clinical pharmacist and health coach-delivered intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, primary outcome), blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (secondary outcomes) in African-Americans and Latinos with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A 2-year, randomized controlled crossover study will evaluate the effectiveness of an mHealth diabetes intervention delivered by a health coach and clinical pharmacist team compared with usual care. All patients will receive 1 year of team intervention, including lifestyle and medication support delivered in the home with videoconferencing and text messages. All patients will also receive 1 year of usual care without team intervention and no home visits. The order of the conditions received will be randomized. Our recruitment goal is 220 urban African-American or Latino adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥8%) receiving care from a largely minority-serving, urban academic medical center. The intervention includes the following: health coaches supporting patients through home visits, phone calls, and text messaging and clinical pharmacists supporting patients through videoconferences facilitated by health coaches. Data collection includes physiologic (HbA1c, blood pressure, weight, and lipid profile) and survey measures (medication adherence, diabetes-related behaviors, and quality of life). Data collection during the second year of study will determine the maintenance of any physiological improvement among participants receiving the intervention during the first year.

RESULTS

Participant enrollment began in March 2017. We have recruited 221 patients. Intervention delivery and data collection will continue until November 2021. The results are expected to be published by May 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

This is among the first trials to incorporate health coaches, clinical pharmacists, and mHealth technologies to increase access to diabetes support among urban African-Americans and Latinos to achieve therapeutic goals.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/17170.

Treatment and Outcomes of Inpatient Hypertension Among Adults With Noncardiac Admissions

IMPORTANCE

Despite high prevalence of elevated blood pressure (BP) among medical inpatients, BP management guidelines are lacking for this population. The outcomes associated with intensifying BP treatment in the hospital are poorly studied.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize clinician response to BP in the hospital and at discharge and to compare short- and long-term outcomes associated with antihypertensive treatment intensification.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study took place from January 1 to December 31, 2017, with 1 year of follow-up at 10 hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Hospitals health care system. All adults admitted to a medicine service in 2017 were evaluated for inclusion. Patients with cardiovascular diagnoses were excluded. Demographic and BP characteristics were used for propensity matching.

EXPOSURES

Acute hypertension treatment, defined as administration of an intravenous antihypertensive medication or a new class of an oral antihypertensive treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The association between acute hypertension treatment and subsequent inpatient acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, and stroke was measured. Postdischarge outcomes included stroke and myocardial infarction within 30 days and BP control up to 1 year.

RESULTS

Among 22 834 adults hospitalized for noncardiovascular diagnoses (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [17.9] years; 12 993 women [56.9%]; 15 963 White patients [69.9%]), 17 821 (78%) had at least 1 hypertensive BP recorded during their admission. Of these patients, 5904 (33.1%) were treated. A total of 8692 of 106 097 cases (8.2%) of hypertensive systolic BPs were treated; of these, 5747 (66%) were treated with oral medications. In a propensity-matched sample controlling for patient and BP characteristics, treated patients had higher rates of subsequent acute kidney injury (466 of 4520 [10.3%] vs 357 of 4520 [7.9%]; P < .001) and myocardial injury (53 of 4520 [1.2%] vs 26 of 4520 [0.6%]; P = .003). There was no BP interval in which treated patients had better outcomes than untreated patients. A total of 1645 of 17 821 patients (9%) with hypertension were discharged with an intensified antihypertensive regimen. Medication intensification at discharge was not associated with better BP control in the following year.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, hypertension was common among medical inpatients, but antihypertensive treatment intensification was not. Intensification of therapy without signs of end-organ damage was associated with worse outcomes.

Medication Use Quality and Safety in Older Adults: 2019 Update

Improving the quality of medication use and medication safety are important priorities for prescribers who care for older adults. The objective of this article was to identify four exemplary articles with this focus in 2019. We selected high-quality studies that moved the field of research forward and were not merely replication studies. The chosen articles cover domains related to aspects of suboptimal prescribing and medication safety. The first study used a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries to examine the continuation of medications with limited benefit in patients admitted for cancer and non-cancer diagnoses in hospice (domain: potentially inappropriate medications). The second study, a retrospective cohort study of older adults in Ontario, Canada, assessed the association between prescribing oral anticoagulants in an emergency department relative to not prescribing anticoagulants in the emergency department and their persistence at 6 months (domain: underuse of medications). The third study, a cluster randomized trial in Quebec, Canada, evaluated the effect of conducting electronic medication reconciliation on several outcomes including adverse drug events and medication discrepancies (domain: medication safety). Lastly, the fourth study, a retrospective study using national inpatient and outpatient Veteran Health Administration combined with clinical and Medicare Claims data, examined the effects of intensification of antihypertensive medications on older adults' likelihood for hospital re-admission and other important clinical outcomes (domain: medication safety). Collectively, this review succinctly highlights pertinent topics related to promoting safe use of medications and promotes awareness of optimizing older adults' medication regimens.

Validation of a Health System Measure to Capture Intensive Medication Treatment of Hypertension in the Veterans Health Administration

IMPORTANCE

Blood pressure (BP) targets are the main measure of high-quality hypertension care in health systems. However, BP alone does not reflect intensity of pharmacological treatment, which should be carefully managed in older patients.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate an electronic health record (EHR) data-only algorithm using pharmacy and BP data to capture intensive hypertension care (IHC), defined as 3 or more BP medications and BP less than 120 mm Hg, and to identify conditions associated with greater IHC, either through greater algorithm false-positive IHC, or by contributing clinically to delivering more IHC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study was conducted among 319 randomly selected patients aged 65 years or older receiving IHC from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2013. Data were collected from a total of 3625 primary care visits. Data were analyzed from January 2017 to March 2020.

EXPOSURES

Calibration and measurement of the algorithm for IHC (algorithm IHC).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

For each primary care visit, the reference standard, clinical IHC, was determined by detailed review of free-text clinical notes. The correlation in BP medication count between the EHR-only algorithm vs the reference standard and the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm IHC were calculated. In addition, presence vs absence of contributing conditions acting in combination with hypertension management were measured to examine incidence of IHC associated with contributing conditions, including an acute condition that lowered BP (eg, dehydration), another condition requiring a BP target lower than the standard 140 mm Hg (eg, diabetes), or the patient needing a BP-lowering medication for a nonhypertension condition (eg, β-blocker for atrial fibrillation) resulting in low BP.

RESULTS

Among 319 patients with 3625 visits (mean [SD] age, 75.6 [7.2] years; 3592 [99.1%] men), 911 visits (25.1%) had clinical IHC by the reference standard. The algorithm for determining medication count was highly correlated with the reference standard (r = 0.84). Sensitivity of detecting clinical IHC was 92.2% (95% CI, 89.3%-95.1%), and specificity was 97.2% (95% CI, 96.1%-98.3%), suggesting that clinical IHC can be identified from routinely collected data. Only 75 visits (2.1%) were algorithm IHC false positives, 55 visits (1.5%) involved IHC with contributing conditions, and 125 visits (3.5%) involved either false-positive or IHC with contributing conditions. Among select contributing conditions, congestive heart failure (37 patients [5.2%]) was most associated with a prespecified combined false-positive or IHC with contributing conditions rate higher than 5%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that health system data can be used reliably to estimate IHC.

Prevalence of Diabetes Medication Intensifications in Older Adults Discharged From US Veterans Health Administration Hospitals

Importance

Elevated blood glucose levels are common in hospitalized older adults and may lead clinicians to intensify outpatient diabetes medications at discharge, risking potential overtreatment when patients return home.

Objective

To assess how often hospitalized older adults are discharged with intensified diabetes medications and the likelihood of benefit associated with these intensifications.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study examined patients aged 65 years and older with diabetes not previously requiring insulin. The study included patients who were hospitalized in a Veterans Health Administration hospital for common medical conditions between 2011 and 2013.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Intensification of outpatient diabetes medications, defined as receiving a new or higher-dose medication at discharge than was being taken prior to hospitalization. Mixed-effect logistic regression models were used to control for patient and hospitalization characteristics.

Results

Of 16 178 patients (mean [SD] age, 73 [8] years; 15 895 [98%] men), 8535 (53%) had a preadmission hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level less than 7.0%, and 1044 (6%) had an HbA1c level greater than 9.0%. Overall, 1626 patients (10%) were discharged with intensified diabetes medications including 781 (5%) with new insulins and 557 (3%) with intensified sulfonylureas. Nearly half of patients receiving intensifications (49% [791 of 1626]) were classified as being unlikely to benefit owing to limited life expectancy or already being at goal HbA1c, while 20% (329 of 1626) were classified as having potential to benefit. Both preadmission HbA1c level and inpatient blood glucose recordings were associated with discharge with intensified diabetes medications. Among patients with a preadmission HbA1c level less than 7.0%, the predicted probability of receiving an intensification was 4% (95% CI, 3%-4%) for patients without elevated inpatient blood glucose levels and 21% (95% CI, 15%-26%) for patients with severely elevated inpatient blood glucose levels.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, 1 in 10 older adults with diabetes hospitalized for common medical conditions was discharged with intensified diabetes medications. Nearly half of these individuals were unlikely to benefit owing to limited life expectancy or already being at their HbA1c goal.

Hypertension Management in Nursing Homes: Review of Evidence and Considerations for Care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We sought to summarize recent evidence regarding optimal blood pressure (BP) treatment targets and antihypertensive regimen intensity for nursing home (NH) residents and similar older, complex patients with hypertension.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent trials have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits from more intensive BP targets among ambulatory, less complex older adults, but generalizability to NH residents is questionable. Other trials have demonstrated that de-intensifying antihypertensives in frail, older patients is feasible, with no or modest increases in BP, but most have not assessed effects on patient-centered outcomes. Observational studies with patients more representative of NH residents suggest harms associated with more intensive BP treatment and reduction in fall risk associated with deintensification, but findings and potential for bias vary across studies. Randomized trials and rigorous observational studies examining effects of deintensified BP management on patient-centered outcomes in complex, older populations are needed to inform improved guidelines and treatment for NH residents.

Management of blood pressure in stroke

Objective

In this review and opinion piece, we discuss recent United States (US)-based guidance statements on the management of BP in stroke according to stroke type and stage of stroke.

Methods

We reviewed the most recent guidance statements on BP control from United States (US)-based organizations such as the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC), and articles available to the authors in their personal files.

Results

The key BP target before starting alteplase (t-PA) is < 185/110 mm Hg, and the maintenance BP after tPA administration is < 180/105 mm Hg. For IPH patients with systolic BP between 150 and 220 mm Hg and no contraindication to acute BP reduction therapy, acute lowering to 140 mm Hg systolic BP is safe. For persons with small vessel or lacunar cerebral ischemia, a reasonable BP lowering target is < 130 mm Hg systolic. For primary stroke prevention, the target BP for those with hypertension is < 140/90 mm Hg and self-measured BP is recommended to assist in BP control. Recent study and guidance suggest a BP target of <130/80 mm Hg for both primary and recurrent stroke prevention. BP control is reasonable for the prevention of cognitive decline or dementia.

Conclusions

BP targets for the proper management of stroke vary by chronological stage of stroke and by stroke subtype. Furthermore, consideration should be given to control of BP variability, especially in the acute phases of stroke, as it may play a role in conferring longer term outcomes.

•

Stroke is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and is well suited for prevention and acute treatment with proper BP management.

•

BP targets in acute ischemic stroke vary whether intravenous alteplase is administered or an endovascular intervention is implemented or not.

•

In acute intraparenchymal hemorrhage of the brain (IPH), it is reasonable to lower BP to a systolic level of 140–150 or up to 160 mm Hg.

•

For both first and recurrent stroke prevention it is reasonable to aim for a BP target of <130/80 mm Hg based on the recent data.

•

The revised BP target has been lowered to <130/80 mm Hg for prevention of major cardiovascular outcomes including stroke.

•

Intensive BP control potentially preserves cognition, brain health, and brain structural integrity.

•

Blood pressure variability is a new target for study in the acute treatment and prevention of stroke.