Aggressive Radiation-Induced Cavernous Sinus Meningioma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

Radiation-induced meningiomas are the most common radiation-induced neoplasms. They exhibit a distinct aggressive clinical behavior as rapid growth, recurrences, multiplicity, and malignant progression are common features.1-4 Atypical histological findings and aberrant cytogenetics are increasingly identified.5-7 Radical resection of aggressive radiation-induced meningiomas is the best treatment option and would offer the best chance for control of the disease. Wide bone and dural margins should be pursued in the resection. Parasellar extension creates significant surgical challenges. Cavernous sinus exploration through the multidirectional axis provided by the cranioorbital zygomatic approach allows radical resection of the tumor, cranial nerve decompression, and carotid artery preservation and control.8-11 This article describes a cavernous sinus radiation-induced meningioma after radiation for Cushing disease. It demonstrates the details of the extra- and intradural exploration and dissection of the neurovascular structures in the cavernous sinus, with proximal and distal control of the carotid artery. However, even after radical resection, recurrence is a common finding in this malignant behavioral radiation-induced tumor. Patient consented for surgery. Image at 9:41 comes from the Science Museum Group, United Kingdom. Refer to the Wellcome blog post (archive). This image is licensed under the CC-BY 4.0 International license.

Genomic landscape of intracranial meningiomas

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial neoplasms in adults. Current histopathological grading schemes do not consistently predict their natural history. Classic cytogenetic studies have disclosed a progressive course of chromosomal aberrations, especially in high-grade meningiomas. Furthermore, the recent application of unbiased next-generation sequencing approaches has implicated several novel genes whose mutations underlie a substantial percentage of meningiomas. These insights may serve to craft a molecular taxonomy for meningiomas and highlight putative therapeutic targets in a new era of rational biology-informed precision medicine.

The role of dicentric chromosome formation and secondary centromere deletion in the evolution of myeloid malignancy

Dicentric chromosomes have been identified as instigators of the genome instability associated with cancer, but this instability is often resolved by one of a number of different secondary events. These include centromere inactivation, inversion, and intercentromeric deletion. Deletion or excision of one of the centromeres may be a significant occurrence in myeloid malignancy and other malignancies but has not previously been widely recognized, and our reports are the first describing centromere deletion in cancer cells. We review what is known about dicentric chromosomes and the mechanisms by which they can undergo stabilization in both constitutional and cancer genomes. The failure to identify centromere deletion in cancer cells until recently can be partly explained by the standard approaches to routine diagnostic cancer genome analysis, which do not identify centromeres in the context of chromosome organization. This hitherto hidden group of primary dicentric, secondary monocentric chromosomes, together with other unrecognized dicentric chromosomes, points to a greater role for dicentric chromosomes in cancer initiation and progression than is generally acknowledged. We present a model that predicts and explains a significant role for dicentric chromosomes in the formation of unbalanced translocations in malignancy.

Centromere fission, not telomere erosion, triggers chromosomal instability in human carcinomas

The majority of sporadic carcinomas suffer from a kind of genetic instability in which chromosome number changes occur together with segmental defects. This means that changes involving intact chromosomes accompany breakage-induced alterations. Whereas the causes of aneuploidy are described in detail, the origins of chromosome breakage in sporadic carcinomas remain disputed. The three main pathways of chromosomal instability (CIN) proposed until now (random breakage, telomere fusion and centromere fission) are largely based on animal models and in vitro experiments, and recent studies revealed several discrepancies between animal models and human cancer. Here, we discuss how the experimental systems translate to human carcinomas and compare the theoretical breakage products to data from patient material and cancer cell lines. The majority of chromosomal defects in human carcinomas comprises pericentromeric breaks that are captured by healthy telomeres, and only a minor proportion of chromosome fusions can be attributed to telomere erosion or random breakage. Centromere fission, not telomere erosion, is therefore the most probably trigger of CIN and early carcinogenesis. Similar centromere–telomere fusions might drive a subset of congenital defects and evolutionary chromosome changes.

Oral solitary fibrous tumor: a cytogenetic analysis of tumor cells in culture with literature review

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is an uncommon spindle-cell neoplasm of mesenchymal origin. Because the pathogenetic background of SFT is still controversial, cytogenetic analysis could help in tumor diagnosis and prognosis. In this study, cultured SFT cells from a lower lip lesion that presented characteristic immunopositivity for CD34, vimentin, CD99, and BCL2 showed a unique cytogenetic finding: 46,XX,inv(2)(p21q35),t(3;12)(q25;q15). To our knowledge, this is the third report of cytogenetic result of a case involving the oral cavity. The SFT cells in culture that maintained their immunohistochemical expression of diagnostic molecules, showed unique chromosomal changes previously unreported when compared with already documented ones. Our data suggest that the complicated pathogenetic nature of SFT is possibly tumor- or organ-related.

'Putting our heads together': insights into genomic conservation between human and canine intracranial tumors

Numerous attributes render the domestic dog a highly pertinent model for cancer-associated gene discovery. We performed microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 60 spontaneous canine intracranial tumors to examine the degree to which dog and human patients exhibit aberrations of ancestrally related chromosome regions, consistent with a shared pathogenesis. Canine gliomas and meningiomas both demonstrated chromosome copy number aberrations (CNAs) that share evolutionarily conserved synteny with those previously reported in their human counterpart. Interestingly, however, genomic imbalances orthologous to some of the hallmark aberrations of human intracranial tumors, including chromosome 22/NF2 deletions in meningiomas and chromosome 1p/19q deletions in oligodendrogliomas, were not major events in the dog. Furthermore, and perhaps most significantly, we identified highly recurrent CNAs in canine intracranial tumors for which the human orthologue has been reported previously at low frequency but which have not, thus far, been associated intimately with the pathogenesis of the tumor. The presence of orthologous CNAs in canine and human intracranial cancers is strongly suggestive of their biological significance in tumor development and/or progression. Moreover, the limited genetic heterogenity within purebred dog populations, coupled with the contrasting organization of the dog and human karyotypes, offers tremendous opportunities for refining evolutionarily conserved regions of tumor-associated genomic imbalance that may harbor novel candidate genes involved in their pathogenesis. A comparative approach to the study of canine and human intracranial tumors may therefore provide new insights into their genetic etiology, towards development of more sophisticated molecular subclassification and tailored therapies in both species.

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization of mapped BAC DNA clones to screen for chromosome 14 copy number abnormalities in meningiomas

Chromosome 14 loss in meningiomas are associated with more aggressive tumour behaviour. To date, no studies have been reported in which the entire chromosome 14q of meningioma tumour cells has been studied by high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH). Here, we used a high-resolution a-CGH to define the exact localization and extent of numerical changes of chromosome 14 in meningioma patients. An array containing 807 bacterial artificial chromosome clones specific for chromosome 14q (average resolution of approximately 130 Kb) was constructed and applied to the study of 25 meningiomas in parallel to the confirmatory interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) analyses. Overall, abnormalities of chromosome 14q were detected in 10/25 cases (40%). Interestingly, in seven of these cases, loss of chromosome 14q32.3 was detected by iFISH and confirmed to correspond to monosomy 14 by a-CGH. In contrast, discrepant results were found between iFISH and a-CGH in the other three altered cases. In one patient, a diploid background was observed by iFISH, while monosomy 14 was identified by a-CGH. In the remaining two cases, which showed gains of the IGH gene by iFISH, a-CGH did not detected copy number changes in one case showing a tetraploid karyotype, while in the other tumour, varying genetic imbalances along the long arm of chromosome 14 were detected. In summary, here, we report for the first time, the high-resolution a-CGH profiles of chromosome 14q in meningiomas, confirming that monosomy 14 is the most frequent alteration associated with this chromosome; other numerical abnormalities being only sporadically detected.

De novo versus transformed atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: comparisons of clinical course, cytogenetics, cytokinetics, and outcome

OBJECTIVE

The clinical course of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas is heterogeneous. As malignant gliomas, aggressive meningiomas may arise de novo or transform from a benign tumor. This study aims to compare differences in clinical behavior, cytogenetics, cytokinetics, receptor status, and outcome between de novo malignant meningiomas and meningiomas that progressed to malignancy.

METHODS

Data from 36 patients with atypical or anaplastic meningiomas were selected for retrospective analysis and divided into two subgroups: 1) de novo atypical or anaplastic tumors and 2) tumors that progressed from a lower grade. We analyzed data concerning patients' sex, age, tumor location, number of operations, status of hormone receptors, proliferative indices, cytogenetic findings, additional therapy, and survival. For meningiomas with progression, we calculated the interval between initial diagnosis and tumor progression.

RESULTS

For atypical meningiomas, the subgroups had significant differences in status of progesterone receptors, proliferative indices, cytogenetics, and patients' outcome. The anaplastic group had similar differences, but they did not reach statistical significance because of the small numbers. There was a loss of part or monosomy of chromosome 10 and an increased monosomy or derivative chromosome 1 combined with monosomy of chromosome 14. These phenomena occurred mainly in patients with malignant transformation who had a worse outcome.

CONCLUSION

De novo malignant meningiomas and meningiomas with malignant transformation may represent distinct subgroups of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas.

[Cytogenetic alterations in meningioma tumors and their impact on disease outcome]

In recent years important advances have been achieved in the understanding of the genetic abnormalities present in meningioma tumors and its association with the ontogeny and progression of these tumor. Accordingly, while the presence of monosomy 22/22q-, associated with mutation of the NF2, BAM22, RRP22, GAR22, MN1, SMARCB1, CLH22 and/or LARGE genes, is associated with neoplasic transformation, other alterations such us monosomy 14, del(1p), different chromosomal abnormalities localized at 9p, 10q and 17q and complex karyotypes are frequently related to tumor progression. From the clinical point of view, currently available information about the impact of the different cytogenetic abnormalities on disease behavior and patient outcome is still scanty; nevertheless, the presence of gains of chromosome 22 in the context of a hyperdiploid karyotype, as well as del(1p) and monosomy 14 have been associated with a statistically significantly shorter recurrence-free survival, this later abnormality showing an independent prognostic value.

Progesterone and estrogen receptors: opposing prognostic indicators in meningiomas

OBJECT

The preponderance of progesterone receptors (PRs) and the scarcity of estrogen receptors (ERs) in meningiomas are well known. The expression of PRs may relate to tumor grade and recurrence. Cytogenetic abnormalities are associated with aggressive behavior, recurrence, and progression. In this study, the authors focus on the prognostic implications of hormone receptors in meningiomas to help determine the clinical and biological aggressiveness of tumors and their correlations with cytogenetic abnormalities.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-nine patients with meningiomas were separated into three groups. Group 1 (PR-positive group) comprised patients whose meningiomas displayed expression of PRs alone. Group 2 (receptor-negative group) included patients whose lesions did not have receptors for either progesterone or estrogen. Group 3 (ER-positive group) included patients whose tumors displayed expression of ERs. Clinical and histological findings, proliferative indices, tumor recurrence, and cytogenetic findings were analyzed by performing the Fisher exact test. Compared with the receptor-negative (Group 2) and ER-positive (Group 3) groups, the PR-positive group (Group 1) had a statistically significant lower proliferative index and a smaller number of patients in whom there were aggressive histopathological findings or changes in karyotype. In Groups 1, 2, and 3, the percentages of cases with aggressive histopathological findings were 10, 31, and 33%, respectively; the percentages of cases with chromosomal abnormalities were 50, 84, and 86%, respectively; and the percentages of cases in which there initially was no residual tumor but recurrence was documented were 5, 30, and 27%, respectively. A statistically significant increase in the involvement of chromosomes 14 and 22 was identified in receptor-negative and ER-positive de novo meningiomas, when compared with the PR-positive group. Abnormalities on chromosome 19 were statistically significantly higher in receptor-negative meningiomas than in PR-positive tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of the PR alone in meningiomas signals a favorable clinical and biological outcome. A lack of receptors or the presence of ERs in meningiomas correlates with an accumulation of qualitative and quantitative karyotype abnormalities, a higher proportional involvement of chromosomes 14 and 22 in de novo tumors, and an increasing potential for aggressive clinical behavior, progression, and recurrence of these lesions. Sex hormone receptor status should routinely be studied for its prognostic value, especially in female patients, and should be taken into account in tumor grading. The initial receptor status of a tumor may change in progression or recurrence of tumor.

Previously unidentified complex cytogenetic changes found in a pediatric case of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPNP) is a rare tumor with low malignant potential found in adolescent girls and young women. The pathogenesis of SPNP remains uncertain and its management is controversial. Genetic changes associated with SPNP have seldom been reported. We describe here the cytogenetic investigation of a case of SPNP in a 13-year-old girl whose tumor cells revealed two unrelated clones: one clone characterized by complex karyotypic changes, including breakpoints in two common fragile sites at chromosome 2, band q33, and chromosome 4, band q31, and the second clone defined by partial monosomy for chromosome X. Loss of heterozygosity for HRAS was also identified by array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH). These cumulative changes seem insufficient for activation of cell transformation, but could possibly play a role in priming the cell for future mutagenic events.

Molecular cytogenetic analysis in the study of brain tumors: findings and applications

Classic cytogenetics has evolved from black and white to technicolor images of chromosomes as a result of advances in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, and is now called molecular cytogenetics. Improvements in the quality and diversity of probes suitable for FISH, coupled with advances in computerized image analysis, now permit the genome or tissue of interest to be analyzed in detail on a glass slide. It is evident that the growing list of options for cytogenetic analysis has improved the understanding of chromosomal changes in disease initiation, progression, and response to treatment. The contributions of classic and molecular cytogenetics to the study of brain tumors have provided scientists and clinicians alike with new avenues for investigation. In this review the authors summarize the contributions of molecular cytogenetics to the study of brain tumors, encompassing the findings of classic cytogenetics, interphase- and metaphase-based FISH studies, spectral karyotyping, and metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization. In addition, this review also details the role of molecular cytogenetic techniques in other aspects of understanding the pathogenesis of brain tumors, including xenograft, cancer stem cell, and telomere length studies.

Evidence for telomeric fusions as a mechanism for recurring structural aberrations of chromosome 11 in giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a benign but often aggressive tumor with a tendency toward local recurrence. Telomeric associations (tas) or telomeric fusions are common cytogenetic findings that have been implicated in the initiation of chromosome instability and tumorigenesis. We performed cytogenetic studies on 5 cases of GCTB to further characterize chromosome aberrations in these tumors. Four of the 5 cases showed abnormal karyotypes with clonal telomeric fusions involving chromosome 11. In 3 cases, the telomeric fusions of 11pter were apparently the precursor lesions to the progression of sub-clones with structural chromosome aberrations of 11p. Two tumors demonstrated a similar pattern of progression resulting in whole arm losses of 11p, including sub-clones with both whole-arm unbalanced translocations and whole-arm deletions. A third tumor with clonal tas of 11pter showed 2 additional subclones, one with ring chromosome 11 and the other with an extra copy of 1q. To our knowledge, the 2 cases with del(11)(p11) represent the first report of a recurring structural chromosome aberration in GCTB. These findings support the concept that telomeric instability is responsible for a large degree of intratumor heterogeneity and serves as a precursor lesion to subsequent clonal structural aberrations of chromosome 11 in GCTB.

Chromosomal instability in meningiomas

Approximately 60% of sporadic meningiomas are caused by inactivation of the NF2 tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 22. No causative gene is known for the remaining 40%. Cytogenetic analysis shows that meningiomas caused by inactivation of the NF2 gene can be divided into tumors that show monosomy 22 as the sole abnormality and tumors with a more complex karyotype. Meningiomas not caused by the NF2 gene usually have a diploid karyotype. Here we report that, besides the clonal chromosomal aberrations, the chromosome numbers in many meningiomas varied from one metaphase spread to the other, a feature that is indicative of chromosomal instability. Unexpectedly and regardless of genotype, a subgroup of tumors was observed with an average number of 44.9 chromosomes and little variation in the number of chromosomes per metaphase spread. In addition, a second subgroup was recognized with a hyperdiploid number of chromosomes (average 48.5) and considerable variation in numbers per metaphase. However, this numerical instability resulted in a clonal karyotype with chromosomal gains and losses in addition to loss of chromosome 22 only in meningiomas caused by inactivation of the NF2 gene. In cultured cells of all tumor groups, bi- and multinucleated cells were seen, as well as anaphase bridges, residual chromatid strings, multiple spindle poles, and unseparated chromatids, suggesting defects in the mitotic apparatus or kinetochore. Thus, we conclude that even a benign and slow-growing tumor like a meningioma displays chromosomal instability.

Intratumoral patterns of clonal evolution in meningiomas as defined by multicolor interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): is there a relationship between histopathologically benign and atypical/anaplastic lesions?

Meningiomas are cytogenetically heterogeneous tumors in which chromosome gains and losses frequently occur. Based on the intertumoral cytogenetic heterogeneity of meningiomas, hypothetical models of clonal evolution have been proposed in these tumors which have never been confirmed at the intratumoral cell level. The aim of this study was to establish the intratumoral patterns of clonal evolution associated with chromosomal instability in individual patients as a way to establish tumor progression pathways in meningiomas and their relationship with tumor histopathology and behavior. A total of 125 meningioma patients were analyzed at diagnosis. In all cases, multicolor interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) studies were performed on fresh tumor samples for the detection of quantitative abnormalities for 11 different chromosomes. In addition, overall tumor cell DNA content was measured in parallel by flow cytometry. iFISH studies were also performed in parallel on tissue sections in a subset of 30 patients. FISH studies showed that 56 (45%) of the 125 cases analyzed had a single tumor cell clone, all these cases corresponding to histologically benign grade I tumors. In the remaining cases (55%) more than one tumor cell clone was identified: two in 45 cases (36%), three in 19 (15%), and four or more clones in five cases (4%). Overall, flow cytometric analysis of cell DNA contents showed the presence of DNA aneuploidy in 44 of these cases (35%), 30% corresponding to DNA hyperdiploid and 5% to hypodiploid cases; from the DNA aneuploid cases, 35 (28%) showed two clones and 9 (7%) had three or more clones. A high degree of correlation (r >/= 0.89; P < 0.001) was found between FISH and flow cytometry as regards the overall quantitative DNA changes detected with both techniques, the former being more sensitive. Among the cases with chromosome abnormalities, the earliest tumor cell clone observed was frequently characterized by the loss of one or more chromosomes (64% of all meningiomas); loss of either a single chromosome 22 or, less frequently, of a sex chromosome (X or Y) and del (1p) was commonly found as the single initial cytogenetic aberration (30%, 5%, and 5% of the cases, respectively). Interestingly, an isolated loss of chromosome 22 was only found as the initial abnormality in one out of 14 atypical/anaplastic meningiomas, while the same cytogenetic pattern was present in the ancestral tumor cell clone of 32% of the benign tumors. Cytogenetic patterns based on chromosome gains were found in the ancestral tumor cell clone in 4% of the patients, 2% corresponding to tetraploid tumors. Overall, cytogenetic evolution of the earliest tumor cell clones was frequently associated with tetraploidization (31%). Our results show that meningiomas are genetically heterogeneous tumors that display different patterns of numerical chromosome changes, with the presence of more than one tumor cell clone detected in almost half of the cases including all atypical/anaplastic cases. Interestingly, the pathways of intratumoral clonal evolution observed in the benign tumors were different from those observed in atypical/anaplastic meningiomas, suggesting that the latter tumors might not always represent a more advanced stage of histologically benign meningiomas.

Chromosomal instability in oral cancer cells

Chromosomal instability is a common feature of human tumors, including oral cancer. Although a tumor karyotype may remain quite stable over time, chromosomal instability can lead to 'variations on a theme' of a clonal cell population, often with each cell within a tumor possessing a different karyotype. Thus, chromosomal instability appears to be an important acquired feature of tumor cells, since propagation of such a diverse cell population may facilitate evasion of standard therapies. There are several sources of chromosomal instability, although the primary causes appear to be defects in chromosomal segregation, telomere stability, cell-cycle checkpoint regulation, and the repair of DNA damage. Our understanding of the biological basis of chromosomal instability in cancer cells is increasing rapidly, and we are finding that the seemingly unrelated origins of this phenomenon may actually be related through the complex network of cellular signaling pathways. Here, we review the general causes of chromosomal instability in human tumors. Specifically, we address the state of our knowledge regarding chromosomal instability in oral cancer, and discuss various mechanisms that enhance the ability of cancer cells within a tumor to express heterogeneous karyotypes. In addition, we discuss the clinical relevance of factors associated with chromosomal instability as they relate to tumor prognosis and therapy.

Radiation-induced meningiomas: clinical, pathological, cytokinetic, and cytogenetic characteristics

Object. Radiation-induced meningiomas are known to occur after high- and low-dose cranial radiation therapy. The goal of this study was to discern the distinguishing findings and characteristics of radiation-induced meningiomas.

Methods. The records of 16 patients (seven men and nine women) who fulfilled the criteria for radiation-induced meningiomas were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, histopathological, cytokinetic, and cytogenetic findings as well as the patients' outcome were analyzed.

The mean age of the patients was 38.8 years and the mean tumor latency was 26.5 years. Five patients had multiple meningiomas in the irradiated field. The recurrence rate was 100% after the initial resection; 62% of patients had a second recurrence and 17% had a third recurrence. Thirty-eight percent of patients had atypical or malignant histopathological findings. The presence of progesterone receptors and low proliferation indices in these patients did not correlate with benign tumor behavior. Cytogenetic analysis showed multiple clonal aberrations in all tumors studied. The most frequent aberrations were found on chromosomes 1p, 6q, and 22. Derivative, lost, or additional chromosome 1p was found in 89% of cases and loss or deletion on chromosome 6 was found in 67%.

Conclusions. The age of patients at presentation with meningioma and the latency period of radiation-induced meningiomas are dose related. These tumors are more aggressive and are certain to recur, have a higher histopathological grade, and are associated with complex cytogenetic aberrations particularly involving 1p and 6q.

Association of loss of 1p and alterations of chromosome 14 in meningioma progression

Meningiomas are usually benign tumors; however, they can recur after surgical resection and occasionally show histologic progression to a higher grade II and III malignancy. The second most frequently reported genetic abnormality after 22q loss is deletion of 1p, although alterations in 9q, 10q, and 14q are also implicated in meningioma progression. Fourteen tumors comprising six benign, four atypical, and four malignant meningiomas were examined by means of cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. All tumors showed losses in different regions of 1p, with 1p11, 1p13, 1p21, 1p22, 1p32, and 1q21 breakpoints; eight tumors also presented alterations of chromosome 14. Five of the six cases with deletions on 1p and normal chromosome 14 were grade I, and two were recurrent. All but one of the eight cases with simultaneous 1p deletion and alterations of chromosome 14 were grade II (3 cases) and grade III (4 cases); all the grade III cases were recurrent. These results support the possible association between changes in 1p and chromosome 14 with the evolution of aggressive meningiomas through tumor progression.

New classification scheme for the prognostic stratification of meningioma on the basis of chromosome 14 abnormalities, patient age, and tumor histopathology

PURPOSE

Meningiomas are usually considered benign tumors. However, relapses occur in 10% to 20% of all patients, including both histopathologically aggressive and benign tumors. This study explored the value of numerical abnormalities for 10 different chromosomes in meningiomas for predicting relapse-free survival (RFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study prospectively analyzed the frequency of numerical abnormalities of chromosomes 1, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22, X, and Y in 70 meningioma patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization and their relationship with disease characteristics at diagnosis and patients' outcome.

RESULTS

Results showed the presence of numerical abnormalities for one or more chromosomes in most patients (77%). Chromosome 22 in the whole series and chromosome Y in males were those more frequently altered, followed by chromosomes 1, 14, and X in females. Patients with abnormalities of chromosomes 1, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, the sex chromosomes, and gains of chromosome 22 were associated with adverse prognostic features, more frequent relapses, and shorter RFS. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor grade together with chromosome 14 status and age were the best combination of independent variables for predicting RFS. According to these variables, all patients with a score of two or more than two adverse prognostic factors had experienced relapse at 5 years, whereas none of those with a score of zero had experienced relapse 10 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

In addition to age and histologic grade, abnormalities of chromosome 14 contribute to a better prognostic stratification of meningioma patients at diagnosis. Additional prospective studies in larger series of patients, also including larger numbers of patients who experienced relapse, are necessary to confirm the utility of the proposed predictive model.

Telomeric fusion as a mechanism for the loss of 1p in meningioma

Characteristic cytogenetic aberrations are found in the various histopathological designations of meningioma. These aberrations range from the loss of 22q in histologically benign tumors to complex hypodiploid karyotypes in atypical and malignant tumors. This progression is characterized by increasing chromosome loss and instability, with a critical step being the loss of 1p. We report a detailed cytogenetic investigation of chromosome aberrations in a series of 88 meningiomas using Giemsa banding and multicolor spectral karyotyping (SKY). Clonal chromosome aberrations were identified in 46 (52%) tumors by G banding. Thirty-five tumors showing complex chromosome aberrations not fully characterized by G banding were subsequently reanalyzed by SKY. The SKY technique refined the G-band findings in 18 (51%) of the tumors on which it was applied. The most common features of cytogenetic progression in the complex karyotypes were chromosome arm-specific losses relating to the formation of deletions and dicentric chromosomes involving 1p. Part or all of 1p was lost in 19 tumors. Five tumors showed evidence for the loss of 1p in a progressive step-wise series of telomeric fusions involving the formation of unstable intermediates. Five recurring dicentric chromosomes were identified, including dic (1;11)(p11;p11), dic(1;12)(p12 approximately p13;p11), dic(1;22)(p11;q12 approximately q13), dic(7;19)(p11;p11), and dic(19;22)(p11 approximately p13;q11 approximately q13). These findings provide evidence that telomeric fusions play a role in the formation of clonal deletions, dicentrics, and unbalanced translocations of 1p. The loss of 1p has possible diagnostic and prognostic implications in the management of meningioma.

Translocation (16;20)(p11.2;q13). sole cytogenetic abnormality in a unicameral bone cyst

We report the results of cytogenetic analysis of a case of unicameral bone cyst with a t(16;20(p11.2;q13) present as the sole abnormality. To our knowledge, this is only the second report of a cytogenetically characterized tumor of this type.

Incidence of numerical chromosome aberrations in meningioma tumors as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization using 10 chromosome-specific probes

OBJECTIVE

Although information on the cytogenetic characteristics of meningioma tumors has accumulated progressively over the past few decades, information on the genetic heterogeneity of meningiomas is still scanty. The aim of the present study was to analyze by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) the incidence of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes 1, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22, X, and Y in a group of 70 consecutive meningioma tumors. Another goal was to establish the potential associations among the altered chromosomes, as a way to assess both intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity.

METHODS

For the purpose of the study, 70 patients diagnosed with meningioma were analyzed. Interphase FISH for the detection of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes 1, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22, X, and Y was applied to fresh tumor samples from each of the patients studied.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of numerical abnormalities was 76%. Chromosome Y in males and chromosome 22 in the whole series were the most common abnormalities (46% and 61%, respectively). Despite the finding that monosomy of chromosome 22/22q(-) deletions are the most frequent individual abnormality (53%), we have observed that chromosome gains are significantly more common than chromosome losses (60% versus 40%). Chromosome gains corresponded to abnormalities of chromosomes 1 (27%), 9 (25%), 10 (23%), 11 (22%), 14 (33%), 15 (22%), 17 (23%), and X in females (35%) and males (23%) whereas chromosome losses apart from chromosome 22 frequently involved chromosomes 14 (19%), X in males (23%), and Y in males (32%). Although an association was found among most gained chromosomes on one side and chromosome losses on the other side, different association patterns were observed. Furthermore, in the latter group, monosomy 22/22q(-) was associated with monosomy X in females and monosomy 14/14q(-) was associated with nulisomy Y in males. In addition, chromosome losses usually involved a large proportion of the tumor cells whereas chromosome gains were restricted to small tumor cell clones, including tetraploid cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that meningiomas are genetically heterogeneous tumors that display different patterns of numerical chromosome changes, as assessed by interphase FISH.

Translocation (1;19)(q21;q13.3) is a recurrent reciprocal translocation in meningioma

Benign meningiomas are characterized by a normal karyotype or loss of all or part of chromosome 22. Histologically higher grade tumors are typically characterized by a pattern of increasing chromosome loss and instability. This characteristic pattern of unbalanced chromosome aberrations is punctuated in the literature by several intriguing reports of a reciprocal t(1;19)(q21;q13.3) as the sole cytogenetic aberration. We report a third case showing the t(1;19)(q21;q13.3) with additional unstable secondary aberrations of a dic(18;22)(p11;p11) and telomeric fusions.

Derivative (1;18)(q10;q10): a recurrent and novel unbalanced translocation involving 1q in myeloid disorders

We report two cases of hematological malignancies, comprising a case of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) that rapidly evolved into acute myeloid leukemia, and a case of myeloproliferative disorder (MPD), in which der(1;18)(q10;q10) was found as the sole acquired karyotypic abnormality. This observation indicates that the unbalanced translocation is a recurrent aberration in myeloid disorders. To the best of our knowledge, centromeric fusion between long arms of chromosomes 1 and 18, leading to a normal chromosome 18 substituted with a der(1;18) chromosome, is novel and has not been described in cancer. Mechanistically, either trisomy 1q or monosomy 18p that results from the translocation may potentially contribute to leukemogenesis. Finally, chromosomes with large constitutive heterochromatin bands such as chromosome 1 may be at risk of centromeric instability and be predisposed to centromeric fusion with other chromosomes.

Chromosome 1p and 14q FISH analysis in clinicopathologic subsets of meningioma: diagnostic and prognostic implications

The second most frequently reported genetic abnormalities in meningiomas after 22q loss are deletions of 1p and 14q. To assess the potential diagnostic and prognostic utility of these chromosomal alterations, we studied 180 well-characterized meningiomas using dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with DNA probes localized to 1p32, 1p36, 14q13, and 14q32. Our cohort consisted of 77 benign (grade I), 74 atypical (grade II), and 29 anaplastic (grade III) meningiomas. Benign and atypical meningiomas were further stratified into subsets of recurring (despite gross total resection) vs non-recurring (at least 10 yr of follow-up) and mitotically active vs brain invasive subsets, respectively. Losses of 1p and 14q losses were identified in 23% and 31% of benign, 56% and 57% of atypical, and 75% and 67% of anaplastic meningiomas, respectively (p < 0.001 for 1p; p = 0.004 for 14q). Combined 1p/14q deletions were encountered in 7% benign. 39% atypical, and 63% anaplastic meningiomas (p < 0.001). Benign non-recurring meningiomas were less likely to harbor 14q deletions than recurring examples (17% vs 50%, p = 0.013). There was a trend for anaplastic meningiomas with 14q deletions and atypical meningiomas with combined 1p/14q deletions to have poorer overall survivals, though neither reached statistical significance. We conclude that 1p and 14q deletions are highly associated with increasing histologic grade and play an important role in meningioma tumor progression. Furthermore, 14q FISH analysis may aid in assessing recurrence risk in histologically benign meningiomas.