Psychological characteristics of infertile couples: can they predict pregnancy and treatment persistence?

The impact of social relations among men and women in fertility treatment on the decision to terminate treatment

STUDY QUESTION

Do social support and social strain from social relations have an impact on the decision to terminate fertility treatment among men and women after 1 year of unsuccessful treatment?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Several functional aspects of social relations show an impact on the probability to terminate treatment; social support from family significantly decreases the probability to terminate and experience of conflicts or problematic communication with the partner significantly increases the probability to terminate treatment.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Fertility patients can experience psychological, physical and economical strain as consequences of infertility and fertility treatment, and previous studies have shown that these pressures increase the probability of deciding to terminate treatment before the treatment options are exhausted. Some studies have indicated that social relations can also have an effect.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study is part of the prospective Infertility Cohort from the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility Research Programme. Baseline data were collected during January 2000-August 2001 among patients recruited at five Danish fertility clinics during their initial visit and follow-up data were collected after 1 year.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The study group (n = 777; 427 women, 350 men) consisted of patients who did not achieve a live birth or an ongoing pregnancy during follow-up. Social support and strain from the patients' partner, family, family-in-law, friends and colleagues were measured at baseline and the decision to terminate treatment while treatment options were not yet exhausted was measured as the outcome at the 1-year follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

At the 1-year follow-up, 23% of the study group had decided to terminate treatment. For women, low levels of family support, specifically with regard to infertility, were associated with the termination of treatment after 1 year [odds ratio (OR) 6.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-16.8] and, for men, low levels of general family support had a similar impact (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.0-7.0). For men, difficulties in communicating with their partner about the infertility increased the probability of terminating the treatment (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.1) and, for women, frequent conflicts with their partner increased the probability of terminating the treatment (OR 12.4, 95% CI 2.9-54.1). For women, conflicts with friends were also a predictor of treatment termination (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.2).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Functional aspects of social relations have an impact on the decision to terminate fertility treatment among men and women. The findings in this study provide new insights into how the close social environment can have implications for men and women going through fertility treatment.

FUNDING

This study has received support from the Danish Health Insurance Fund (J.nr. 11/097-97), the Else and Mogens Wedell-Wedellsborgs Fund, the manager E. Danielsens and Wife's Fund, the merchant L.F. Foghts Fund, the Jacob Madsen and Wife Olga Madsen's Fund, and the Engineer K.A. Rohde and Wife's Fund. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment

BACKGROUND

Chances of achieving parenthood are high for couples who undergo fertility treatment. However, many choose to discontinue before conceiving. A systematic review was conducted to investigate patients' stated reasons for and predictors of discontinuation at five fertility treatment stages.

METHODS

Six databases were systematically searched. Search-terms referred to fertility treatment and discontinuation. Studies reporting on patients' stated reasons for or predictors of treatment discontinuation were included. A list of all reasons for discontinuation presented in each study was made, different categories of reasons were defined and the percentage of selections of each category was calculated. For each predictor, it was noted how many studies investigated it and how many found a positive and/or negative association with discontinuation.

RESULTS

The review included 22 studies that sampled 21 453 patients from eight countries. The most selected reasons for discontinuation were: postponement of treatment (39.18%, postponement of treatment or unknown 19.17%), physical and psychological burden (19.07%, psychological burden 14%, physical burden 6.32%), relational and personal problems (16.67%, personal reasons 9.27%, relational problems 8.83%), treatment rejection (13.23%) and organizational (11.68%) and clinic (7.71%) problems. Some reasons were common across stages (e.g. psychological burden). Others were stage-specific (e.g. treatment rejection during workup). None of the predictors reported were consistently associated with discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Much longitudinal and theory led research is required to explain discontinuation. Meanwhile, treatment burden should be addressed by better care organization and support for patients. Patients should be well informed, have the opportunity to discuss values and worries about treatment and receive advice to decide about continuing treatment.

Tackling burden in ART: an integrated approach for medical staff

Discontinuation is a problem in fertility clinics. Many couples discontinue assisted reproductive technologies (ART) without achieving a live birth for reasons other than poor prognosis or the cost of treatment. Discontinuation has been attributed to the burden of treatment. The causes of burden can be broadly classified according to whether they originate in the patient, clinic or treatment. Interventions to alleviate these burdens include provision of comprehensive educational material, screening to identify highly distressed patients, provision of tailored coping tools and improvements in the clinic environment and medical interventions. Practical interventions to reduce the different causes of burden in ART exist, but further development and evaluation of the efficacy of these interventions requires more precise definition of terms and theory. In this paper, we propose a general integrated approach to cover different perspectives in dealing with burden in ART clinics. We firstly describe the integrated approach and present common sources of burden. We then describe interventions that could help reduce the burden in ART. Our paper is aimed at fertility clinic staff because of their day-to-day involvement with patients. However, this discussion should also be relevant to companies that develop treatments and to psychosocial experts. Reducing the burden of treatment should lead to improved outcomes, namely better quality of life during treatment and lower discontinuation rates.

Stress, distress and outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART): a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A number of studies have investigated the relationship between psychological factors such as stress and distress (measured as anxiety and depression) and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The results, however, are inconsistent, and the strength of any associations remains to be clarified. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the results of studies reporting on the associations between stress, anxiety, and depression and ART outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective studies reporting data on associations between stress or distress in female patients and ART outcome were identified and evaluated by two independent researchers according to an a priori developed codebook. Authors were contacted in cases of insufficient data reporting. Stress was defined as perceived stress, work-related stress, minor life events or major life events, and distress was defined as anxiety or depression.

RESULTS

A total of 31 prospective studies were included. Small, statistically significant, pooled effect sizes were found for stress [ESr, effect size correlation) = -0.08; P = 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.15, -0.01], trait anxiety (ESr = -0.14; P = 0.02, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.03) and state anxiety (ESr = -0.10, P = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.19, -0.01), indicating negative associations with clinical pregnancy rates. A non-significant trend (Esr = -0.11, P = 0.06) was found for an association between depression and clinical pregnancy. For serum pregnancy tests and live birth rates, associations between trait anxiety or state anxiety were not significant. The fail safe number did not exceed the suggested criterion in any analyses, between-study heterogeneity was considerable and the mean age, mean duration of infertility and percentage of first time ART attenders in the study samples were found to moderate several of the associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Small but significant associations were found between stress and distress and reduced pregnancy chances with ART. However, there were a limited number of studies and considerable between-study heterogeneity. Taken together, the influence of stress and distress on ART outcome may appear somewhat limited.

Infertility treatment and fertility-specific distress: A longitudinal analysis of a population-based sample of U.S. women

Because research on infertile women usually uses clinic-based samples of treatment seekers, it is difficult to sort out to what extent distress is the result of the condition of infertility itself and to what extent it is a consequence of the experience of infertility treatment. We use the National Survey of Fertility Barriers, a two-wave national probability sample of U.S. women, to disentangle the effects of infertility and infertility treatment on fertility-specific distress. Using a series of ANOVAs, we examine 266 infertile women who experienced infertility both at Wave 1 and at Wave 2, three years later. We compare eight groups of infertile women based on whether or not they have received treatment and on whether or not they have had a live birth. At Wave 1, infertile women who did not receive treatment and who had no live birth reported lower distress levels than women who received treatment at Wave 1 only, regardless of whether their infertility episode was followed by a live birth. At Wave 2, women who received no treatment have significantly lower fertility-specific distress than women who were treated at Wave 1 or at Waves 1 and 2, regardless of whether there was a subsequent live birth. Furthermore, fertility-specific distress did not increase over time among infertile women who did not receive treatment. The increase infertility-specific distress was significantly higher for women who received treatment at Wave 2 that was not followed by a live birth than for women who received no treatment or for women who received treatment at Wave 1 only. These patterns suggest that infertility treatment is associated with levels of distress over and above those associated with the state of being infertile in and of itself.

The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature

About 10 years ago Greil published a review and critique of the literature on the socio-psychological impact of infertility. He found at the time that most scholars treated infertility as a medical condition with psychological consequences rather than as a socially constructed reality. This article examines research published since the last review. More studies now place infertility within larger social contexts and social scientific frameworks although clinical emphases persist. Methodological problems remain but important improvements are also evident. We identify two vigorous research traditions in the social scientific study of infertility. One tradition uses primarily quantitative techniques to study clinic patients in order to improve service delivery and to assess the need for psychological counselling. The other tradition uses primarily qualitative research to capture the experiences of infertile people in a sociocultural context. We conclude that more attention is now being paid to the ways in which the experience of infertility is shaped by social context. We call for continued progress in the development of a distinctly sociological approach to infertility and for the continued integration of the two research traditions identified here.

A prospective investigation into the reasons why insured United States patients drop out of in vitro fertilization treatment

OBJECTIVE

To determine the primary reason why insured patients drop out of IVF treatment in the United States and to identify methods to decrease such behavior.

DESIGN

Prospective patient survey.

SETTING

Private infertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Women under the age of 40 years, who had insurance coverage for at least three IVF cycles, who did not conceive and who did not return to the clinic for a third treatment cycle.

INTERVENTION(S)

One hundred thirty-two eligible patients received a study packet of questionnaires in the mail.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Subject responses to questionnaire.

RESULT(S)

Forty-seven subjects returned the questionnaire. The most common reason for terminating treatment was stress (39%). Subjects reported that the two main causes of stress were the toll that infertility took on the couples' relationship and being too anxious or depressed to continue. The top-rated suggestions for patient support were written information on how to deal with psychological stress and easy and immediate access to a psychologist or social worker.

CONCLUSION(S)

Patients undergoing IVF in the United States report similar reasons for terminating treatment as patients in Europe and Australia. However, this is the first study to gather patient suggestions for treating the problem.

Infertility-related stress in men and women predicts treatment outcome 1 year later

OBJECTIVE

To examine the separate and joint effects of male and female fertility problem (FP) stress and the source of stress (e.g., personal, social, marital) on treatment outcome.

DESIGN

Prospective, epidemiological cohort design.

SETTING

Fertility clinics in Denmark.

PATIENT(S)

Eight hundred eighteen couples who were about to begin a new course of treatment.

INTERVENTION(S)

An FP stress inventory was administered at the start of treatment, and the treatment outcome was evaluated 12 months later.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Number of treatment cycles in 12-month study period and treatment outcome (i.e., success, no success).

RESULT(S)

Fertility problem stress was associated with a poorer treatment outcome in women (pooled within-groups [WGr] correlation,WGr = .517) and men (WGr = .392) with the effect significantly more pronounced for women (z = 3.19, P<.001). Fertility problem stress arising in the personal and marital domain showed greater associations with treatment outcome than did FP stress from the social domain. Logistic regression indicated that women who reported more marital distress required more treatment cycles to conceive (median 3) than women reporting less marital distress (median 2) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20: Model chi2(3) = 77.21, P<.001).

CONCLUSION(S)

The findings provide evidence that infertility-related stress has direct and indirect effects on treatment outcome.

Counselling--its role in the infertility team

Counselling was made a statutory requirement for clinics providing assisted reproduction services as a result of the concern raised that these treatments would raise uniquely challenging emotional and ethical problems for patients. Before the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, few counsellors specialized in this field and there were no standards for their training or experience. In the intervening years considerable progress has been made in these areas. The research evidence, which informs their practice concerning the impact of infertility and its treatment, has also grown very substantially. There is now a reasonable consensus about the broad nature of the emotional and psychological sequelae, although many unexplored questions remain. In addition, the literature providing evidence for the efficacy and effectiveness of counselling in other areas has developed in both quantity and sophistication. Counsellors are often well-placed to work with patient groups and also with the multidisciplinary assisted conception team itself on the very difficult psychosocial and ethical issues faced in practice. The sophisticated research in these fields has not yet been done in the context of infertility; it is therefore necessary to extrapolate from other fields, especially in mental health practice. This article will argue that there is now ample evidence to support the decisions made by legislators in requiring counselling to be available to patients in assisted conception units. The infertility counselling profession is in a position to begin contributing to the generation of research relevant to this field.

Efficacy of brief couples support groups developed to manage the stress of in vitro fertilization treatment

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of brief couples support groups offered concurrently with in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Couples in IVF treatment were given the option of participating in a biweekly support group at the IVF clinic at Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Tex. At least 1 member of 26 couples participated in the brief couples support groups, and at least 1 member of 19 other couples completed the questionnaires but did not attend the support group sessions and so comprised the control group. Facilitators used cognitive behavioral techniques to help participants process their feelings and cognitions about their infertility. Emotional and cognitive factors were assessed both before and after group attendance by using the Beck Depression Inventory; the Beck Anxiety Inventory; the Life Orientation Test, which assesses optimism and pessimism; the Survey of Personal Views, which measures irrational beliefs; and the Social Provisions Scale, which measures social support.

RESULTS

Women who attended group sessions were significantly less anxious after the IVF treatment than they were before the cycle (P < .001). Men who attended the group sessions were more optimistic than nongroup men or the women at the completion of the IVF cycle (P < .001) but endorsed greater numbers of irrational beliefs (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that the service was relatively inexpensive compared with IVF in the civilian community, the complexity of IVF treatment and the logistic and psychological stress experienced by couples made it hard to form and maintain such groups. Nevertheless, both men and women derived psychological benefit from the group: women reported less anxiety and men greater optimism on completion of the group sessions.

Development of brief stress management support groups for couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment

OBJECTIVE

To develop and assess the efficacy of couples stress management groups offered concurrently with IVF treatment.

DESIGN

Couples in IVF treatment were given the option of participating in a biweekly stress management group.

SETTING

The IVF treatment clinic at Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas.

PATIENT(S)

One or both members of 17 couples participated in the program in one of four group cycles.

INTERVENTION(S)

A cognitive behavioral treatment model was used to help couples process their feelings and cognitions about the impact of infertility on their life and explore their expectations about their future options for becoming parents.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Couples were asked to anonymously evaluate the efficacy of the group after they had completed their IVF cycle.

RESULT(S)

Participants reported that the group helped them deal with the stress of infertility and that they valued the social bonds they formed with other group members.

CONCLUSION(S)

These data suggest that brief focused group therapy, offered while couples are undergoing IVF, is an effective way to help people deal with the stress of infertility treatment.