Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease that leads to right heart failure and premature death. Endothelin receptor antagonists have shown efficacy in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and the reference sections of retrieved articles. The searches are current as of 4 November 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials and quasi-randomised trials involving participants with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two of five review authors selected studies, extracted data and assessed study quality according to established criteria. We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were exercise capacity (six-minute walk distance, 6MWD), World Health Organization (WHO) or New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, Borg dyspnoea scores and dyspnoea-fatigue ratings, and mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 randomised controlled trials involving a total of 3322 participants. Most trials were of relatively short duration (12 weeks to six months). Sixteen trials were placebo-controlled, and of these nine investigated a non-selective ERA and seven a selective ERA.   We evaluated two comparisons in the review: ERA versus placebo and ERA versus phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor. The abstract focuses on the placebo-controlled trials only and presents the pooled results of selective and non-selective ERAs. After treatment, participants receiving ERAs could probably walk on average 25.06 m (95% confidence interval (CI) 17.13 to 32.99 m; 2739 participants; 14 studies; I2 = 34%, moderate-certainty evidence) further than those receiving placebo in a 6MWD. Endothelin receptor antagonists probably improved more participants' WHO functional class (odds ratio (OR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.70; participants = 3060; studies = 15; I2 = 5%, moderate-certainty evidence) and probably lowered the odds of functional class deterioration (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.72; participants = 2347; studies = 13; I2 = 40%, moderate-certainty evidence) compared with placebo. There may be a reduction in mortality with ERAs (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.58, 1.07; 2889 participants; 12 studies; I2 = 0%, low-certainty evidence), and pooled data suggest that ERAs probably improve cardiopulmonary haemodynamics and may reduce Borg dyspnoea score in symptomatic patients. Hepatic toxicity was not common, but may be increased by ERA treatment from 37 to 67 (95% CI 34 to 130) per 1000 over 25 weeks of treatment (OR 1.88, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.90; moderate-certainty evidence). Although ERAs were well tolerated in this population, several cases of irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan have been reported, which led the licence holder for sitaxsentan to withdraw the product from all markets worldwide.  As planned, we performed subgroup analyses comparing selective and non-selective ERAs, and with the exception of mean pulmonary artery pressure, did not detect any clear subgroup differences for any outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For people with pulmonary arterial hypertension with WHO functional class II and III, endothelin receptor antagonists probably increase exercise capacity, improve WHO functional class, prevent WHO functional class deterioration, result in favourable changes in cardiopulmonary haemodynamic variables compared with placebo. However, they are less effective in reducing dyspnoea and mortality. The efficacy data were strongest in those with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension. The irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan and its withdrawal from global markets emphasise the importance of hepatic monitoring in people treated with ERAs. The question of the effects of ERAs on pulmonary arterial hypertension has now likely been answered.. The combined use of ERAs and phosphodiesterase inhibitors may provide more benefit in pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, this needs to be confirmed in future studies.

The limits of oral therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension management

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a devastating disease in which remodeling of the small pulmonary arteries leads to a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and right-sided heart failure. Over the past decade, new treatments for PAH, such as the use of ERAs, PDE-5 inhibitors and prostacyclin analogs, have brought about dramatic improvements in clinical outcomes. Epoprostenol infusion therapy has been shown to improve hemodynamics, functional status, and survival, and it remains the gold standard for treatment of patients with severe PAH. Many agents, approved for PAH are always delivered in pill form. Although oral therapy occupies an important position, it has some drawbacks and limitations in PAH management. For patients in World Health Organization functional class IV and with severe right heart failure, there are few data on the long-term survival of patients treated with oral medications. Further research, exploration, and clinical experience with oral therapy in severe PAH and combination therapy will redefine its position in PAH management.

Transition from prostacyclin analogue infusion to oral therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a 5-year follow-up

Transition from prostacyclin analogue infusion to oral therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is possible with acceptable short- and midterm results. However, there is a paucity of data on long-term outcomes after successful transition. Using a predefined protocol, transition to oral therapy was attempted in 22 patients with clinically stable PAH. Clinical and hemodynamic data were retrospectively collected at baseline as well as during and after transition. Parameters for successful versus nonsuccessful transition were also evaluated. All patients had severe PAH at baseline and showed clinical and hemodynamic improvement with prostacyclin analogue infusion. Initial oral agents used for transition were bosentan (63.6%), sildenafil (31.8%), and tadalafil (4.5%). Combination therapy was used in 68% of the patients. Successful transition was achieved in 11 patients (50%) with a mean transition duration of 16 months. After successful transition, clinical and hemodynamic parameters remained stable at midterm (mean, 18 months) and long-term (mean, 60 months) follow-up. Compared with the successful transition group, patients who experienced failure were older, had a higher frequency of idiopathic PAH, and had worse hemodynamic parameters during treatment with prostacyclin analogue alone, as well as during the transition period. In conclusion, successful transition from prostacyclin analogue infusion to oral therapy can be achieved in a significant proportion of patients with clinically stable PAH. After an initial successful transition, patients were able to maintain clinical and hemodynamic stability at the mid- and long-term follow-up.

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease, which leads to right heart failure and premature death. Recent evidence suggests that endothelin receptor antagonists may be promising drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference section of retrieved articles. Searches are current as of January 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials involving patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Five review authors independently selected studies, assessed study quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 randomised controlled trials involving 1471 patients. All the trials were of relatively short duration (12 weeks to six months). After treatment, patients treated with endothelin receptor antagonists could walk on average 33.71 metres (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.90 to 42.52 metres) further than those treated with placebo in a six-minute walk test. Endothelin receptor antagonists improved more patients' World Health Organization/New York Heart Association (WHO/NYHA) functional class status than placebo (odds ratio (OR) 1.60; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.14), and reduced the odds of functional class deterioration compared with placebo (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42). There was a reduction in mortality that did not reach statistical significance on endothelin receptor antagonists (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24), and limited data suggest that endothelin receptor antagonists improve the Borg dyspnoea score and cardiopulmonary haemodynamics in symptomatic patients. Hepatic toxicity was not common, and endothelin receptor antagonists were well tolerated in this population. However, several cases of irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan have been reported that led to license holder for sitaxsentan to withdraw the product from all markets worldwide.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Endothelin receptor antagonists can increase exercise capacity, improve WHO/NYHA functional class, prevent WHO/NYHA functional class deterioration, reduce dyspnoea and improve cardiopulmonary haemodynamic variables in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with WHO/NYHA functional class II and III. However, there was only a trend towards endothelin receptor antagonists reducing mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Efficacy data are strongest in those with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension. The irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan and its withdrawal from global markets emphasise the importance of hepatic monitoring in patients treated with endothelin receptor antagonists.

Long-term efficacy of bosentan in inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Background. Inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is associated with a poor survival.Objectives. To evaluate the long-term response to a dual endothelin receptor antagonist in patients with inoperable CTEPH.Methods. All consecutive 18 patients (mean age 63+/-14 years) treated with bosentan for symptomatic inoperable CTEPH were included. Efficacy was evaluated by the log value of serum levels of N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (log NTpro BNP), New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA), and the six-minute walk test (6-MWT). All follow-up data (median 31 months) were compared with baseline and divided into: short-term (<12 months), mid-term (between 12 and 24 months), and long-term follow-up (>24 months).Results. At baseline, 15 patients were in NYHA class III and three in NYHA class IV, mean log NT-pro BNP level was 7.2+/-1.4 log pg/ml, and mean 6-MWT distance was 404+/-125 m. During short-term follow-up (n=18), the NYHA class improved (p=0.001), 6-MWT distance increased by 33 m (p=0.03), and log NT-pro BNP decreased to 6.9+/-1.4 log pg/ml (p=0.007). During mid-term follow-up (n=17), the NYHA class improved (p<0.001), the mean 6-MWT distance increased by 41 m (p=0.01), and log NT-pro BNP was 6.9+/-1.4 log pg/ml (p=0.31). During late followup (n=14) the NYHA class was still improved (p=0.03), the 6-MWT distance decreased by 9 m (p=0.73), and log NT-pro BNP was 7.1+/-1.5 log pg/ml (p=0.91). The overall four year survival rate was 88%.

CONCLUSION

Bosentan seems to be effective during long-term treatment in patients with inoperable CTEPH. (Neth Heart J 2009;17:329-33.).

Sildenafil and bosentan improve arterial oxygenation during acute hypoxic exercise: a controlled laboratory trial

OBJECTIVES

Sildenafil and, recently, bosentan have been reported to increase arterial saturation and exercise capacity at altitude. The mechanisms behind this are still poorly defined but may be related to attenuation of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) and improved gas exchange. This study was designed to examine and compare the effect of sildenafil and bosentan on pulmonary gas exchange during acute hypoxic exercise in a controlled laboratory setting.

METHODS

Sixteen athletic university students (8 males, 8 females) were examined during exercise in a hypoxic chamber (11% oxygen) before and after the administration of either sildenafil (n=10) or bosentan (n=6). Respiratory and metabolic measurements were taken at rest and during increasing exercise intensity (up to 90% of their individual maximal oxygen uptake [VO(2)max]) in concert with arterial blood gas sampling.

RESULTS

Both drugs resulted in small, but significant increases in arterial PO(2) (2-3 Torr) and O(2) saturation (3-4%) at rest and during hypoxic exercise, in both men and women. No significant changes in arterial PCO(2) or ventilation were seen at rest or during exercise in hypoxia; however, heart rate (both at rest and during exercise) was increased with both sildenafil and bosentan in both men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that sildenafil and bosentan equally improve arterial oxygenation in acute hypoxia in both men and women, which could account for improved physical performance at altitude.

An integrative review of systematic reviews related to the management of breathlessness in respiratory illnesses

BACKGROUND

Breathlessness is a debilitating and distressing symptom in a wide variety of diseases and still a difficult symptom to manage. An integrative review of systematic reviews of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in non-malignant disease was undertaken to identify the current state of clinical understanding of the management of breathlessness and highlight promising interventions that merit further investigation.

METHODS

Systematic reviews were identified via electronic databases between July 2007 and September 2009. Reviews were included within the study if they reported research on adult participants using either a measure of breathlessness or some other measure of respiratory symptoms.

RESULTS

In total 219 systematic reviews were identified and 153 included within the final review, of these 59 addressed non-pharmacological interventions and 94 addressed pharmacological interventions. The reviews covered in excess of 2000 trials. The majority of systematic reviews were conducted on interventions for asthma and COPD, and mainly focussed upon a small number of pharmacological interventions such as corticosteroids and bronchodilators, including beta-agonists. In contrast, other conditions involving breathlessness have received little or no attention and studies continue to focus upon pharmacological approaches. Moreover, although there are a number of non-pharmacological studies that have shown some promise, particularly for COPD, their conclusions are limited by a lack of good quality evidence from RCTs, small sample sizes and limited replication.

CONCLUSIONS

More research should focus in the future on the management of breathlessness in respiratory diseases other than asthma and COPD. In addition, pharmacological treatments do not completely manage breathlessness and have an added burden of side effects. It is therefore important to focus more research on promising non-pharmacological interventions.

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease, which leads to right heart failure and premature death. Recent evidence suggests that endothelin receptor antagonists may be promising drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference section of retrieved articles. Searches are current as of Februray 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised controlled trials involving patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Five review authors independently selected studies, assessed study quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Five new studies have been added to this updated review, which now includes 11 randomised controlled trials involving 1457 patients. All the trials were of relatively short duration (12 weeks to 6 months). After treatment, patients treated with endothelin receptor antagonists could walk on average 33.7 metres (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.9 to 42.5 metres) further than those treated with placebo in a 6 minute walk test. Endothelin receptor antagonists improved more patients' World Health Organization/New York Heart Association (WHO/NYHA) functional class status than placebo (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 2.1), and reduced the odds of functional class deterioration compared to placebo (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42 ). There was a trend for endothelin receptor antagonists to reduce mortality (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.21 to 1.09), and limited data suggest that endothelin receptor antagonists improve Borg dyspnoea score and cardiopulmonary haemodynamics in symptomatic patients. Hepatic toxicity was not common, and endothelin receptor antagonists were well tolerated in this population.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Endothelin receptor antagonists can increase exercise capacity, improve WHO/NYHA functional class, prevent WHO/NYHA functional class deterioration, reduce dyspnoea and improve cardiopulmonary haemodynamic variables in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with WHO/NYHA functional class II and III. However, there was only a trend towards endothelin receptor antagonists reducing mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Efficacy data are strongest in those with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension.

Treatment of pediatric pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension was once thought to be a rare condition and only managed in specialized centers. Now however, with the advent of echocardiography, it is found in many clinical scenarios, in the neonate with chronic lung disease, in the acute setting in the intensive care unit, in connective tissue disease and in cardiology pre- and postoperatively. We have a better understanding of the pathological process and have a range of medication which is starting to be able to palliate this previously fatal condition. This review describes the areas that are known in this condition and those that are less familiar. The basic physiology behind pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary vascular disease is explained. The histopathologic process and the various diagnostic tools are described and are followed by the current and future therapy at our disposal.

Endothelin receptor antagonist therapy in congenital heart disease with shunt-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: a qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND

Congenital heart disease (CHD) with systemic-topulmonary shunting is associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). There are similar clinical and pathophysiological features between CHD with shunt-associated PAH and idiopathic PAH. Endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs) are oral medications that improve pulmonary hemodynamics, symptoms and functional capacity in many PAH patients. However, the role of ERAs in CHD with shunt-associated PAH is unclear.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were searched for articles published from 1966 through September 2006, as well as bibliographies of all retrieved papers. All published English-language studies of adult CHD patients with shunt-associated PAH treated with ERAs were reviewed for clinical, functional and hemodynamic outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten studies of 174 adult CHD subjects with shunt-associated PAH were identified. Other than one placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, all studies were open-label, uncontrolled observational trials. Subjects were treated with the ERA bosentan for a mean (+/- SD) of 9+/-7 months. Nine studies reported improved World Health Organization (WHO) modification of the New York Heart Association functional class, with 95 of 164 subjects (58%) improving by at least one functional class. The 6 min walk distance improved in all eight studies in which it was assessed. Bosentan was generally well tolerated; 2.3% of subjects withdrew because of elevated liver enzymes. Two patients with WHO functional class IV PAH died during bosentan therapy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of CHD patients with shunt-associated PAH with the ERA bosentan is associated with an improvement in functional class and objectively measured exercise capacity. The consistency of the uncontrolled data and the positive results of a single randomized clinical trial suggest a role for ERA therapy in CHD patients with shunt-associated PAH. Caution is suggested when considering bosentan therapy for CHD patients with WHO functional class IV PAH.

Ambrisentan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Ambrisentan is an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) that was recently approved for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Endothelin (ET) is a potent vasoconstrictor with mitogenic, hypertrophic and pro-inflammatory properties that is upregulated in pulmonary hypertensive diseases. The biologic effects of ET are mediated by 2 cell surface receptors termed ET_A and ET_B. ET_A mediates the vasoconstrictor effect of ET on vascular smooth muscle, whereas ET_B is expressed primarily on vascular endothelial cells where it induces nitric oxide synthesis and acts to clear ET from the circulation. Ambrisentan is the first ET_A selective ERA approved for use in the US. Recently published clinical trials in patients with PAH demonstrate improvement in functional capacity and pulmonary hemodynamics similar to other ET_A selective and non-selective ERAs. Its once daily dosing and lower incidence of serum aminotransferase elevation offer potential advantages over other ERAs, but further experience with this agent is needed to fully understand its long-term efficacy and safety. This review discusses the endothelin family of proteins and receptors and their role in the pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertensive diseases. It also examines the development process, safety profile and clinical trials that have resulted in ambrisentan being approved for treatment of PAH.

Ambrisentan

Elevated endothelin (ET)-1 levels are strongly correlated with the pathogenesis and prognosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Ambrisentan is an orally active, highly selective ETA receptor antagonist with >4000-fold higher selectivity over the ETB receptor. In two large, well designed, 12-week, placebo-controlled, phase III trials (ARIES-1, n = 202 and ARIES-2, n = 192) in patients with PAH (WHO group I), ambrisentan 2.5-10 mg once daily significantly increased 6-minute walk distance by 31-59 m from baseline (primary outcome measure) versus placebo. The incidence of clinical worsening (secondary outcome measure) was significantly delayed for the combined ambrisentan 5 mg once daily groups versus the combined placebo groups from ARIES-1 and -2. At week 12, WHO functional class distribution was significantly improved with once-daily ambrisentan 5 mg, and Borg dyspnoea scores were significantly improved with ambrisentan 2.5-10 mg versus placebo in combined data from the ARIES-1 and -2 trials. The beneficial effects of ambrisentan on exercise capacity, WHO functional class and Borg dyspnoea scores seen at 12 weeks were maintained at 48 weeks in the ARIES-E phase III extension trial (n = 361). One-year survival rates with ambrisentan were 95-97%. Treatment with ambrisentan for up to 2.8 years was generally well tolerated in clinical trials.

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a rare model of endothelial dysfunction

Veno-occlusive disease is among the most serious complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. While hepatic veno-occlusive disease occurs more commonly, the pulmonary variant remains quite rare and often goes unrecognized antemortem. Endothelial damage may represent the pathophysiologic foundation of these clinical syndromes. Recent advances in the treatment of hepatic veno-occlusive disease may have application to its pulmonary counterpart.

Gastrointestinal manifestations of dermatologic disorders

The skin and the gastrointestinal tract may be affected concurrently by the same diseases. Pathogenetically, these conditions may be primarily dermatologic diseases involving the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or systemic diseases involving the skin, GI tract, and liver simultaneously. The correct diagnosis of such conditions relies on the ability of the gastroenterologist to recognize the underlying dermatologic disorder. The goal of this clinical review article is to increase gastroenterologists' awareness and understanding of some of these conditions. Case vignettes are presented and the relevant literature reviewed for epidermolysis bullosa, mastocytosis, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, and melanoma. This review focuses on increasing gastroenterologists' ability to recognize, diagnose, comprehend, and manage patients with these dermatologic conditions who have GI manifestations. Advances in molecular genetics that provide insight into the underlying pathophysiology and histopathology of these lesions are highlighted.